[Fink-users] wtf_1.7-2 on 10.4 unstable

[Robert T Wyatt]

Hi all,

Do you think this will be a fink patch fix or or wtf source fix? --rtw

bash-3.00$ sudo wtfup
Downloading latest wtf acronyms
  % Total% Received % Xferd  Average Speed   TimeTime Time 
 Current
 Dload  Upload   Total   SpentLeft 
 Speed
100  63450  63450 0   6747  0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 
29239

Backing up installed acronyms to /tmp/acronyms.bak
merging with installed acronyms
Installing updated acronyms
The following new acronyms were found:
diff: `-0' option is obsolete; use `-U 0'
diff: Try `diff --help' for more information.
Done.
bash-3.00$

* My operating system:
ProductName:Mac OS X
ProductVersion: 10.4.1
BuildVersion:   8B15

* My gcc version: powerpc-apple-darwin8-gcc-4.0.0 (GCC) 4.0.0 20041026 
(Apple Computer, Inc. build 4061)


* My fink version:
Package manager version: 0.24.7
Distribution version: 0.8.0.rsync



---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] Problem with kxmleditor

[Alexander K. Hansen]

On Jun 20, 2005, at 4:13 PM, arouner wrote:Hello,I installed kxmleditor via fink today, but when I tried to launch it with"kxmleditor &" I had the following result:$kxmleditor &[1] 1127$ dyld: kxmleditor Undefined symbols:/sw/lib/libkdefx.4.dylib undefined reference to _sqrtf expected to bedefined in /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib[1]+  Trace/BPT trap          kxmleditorThanks in advance,AndrewA. Andrew RounerE-MAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]What OS are you running?  If it's Tiger, have you updated kdebase3(-ssl)-shlibs?In any case you may want to try rebuilding it. --Alexander HansenFink Documentarian[Day Job] Levitated Dipole Experimenthttp://psfcwww2.psfc.mit.edu/ldx/ 

Re: [Fink-users] Slightly different libgnome error

[Martin Costabel]

Bart Silverstrim wrote:
[]
[]
LC_ALL=C ../intltool-merge -s -u -c ../po/.intltool-merge-cache ../po 
desktop_gnome_accessibility_keyboard.schemas.in 
desktop_gnome_accessibility_keyboard.schemas

make[2]: *** [desktop_gnome_accessibility_keyboard.schemas] Bus error


Intltool-merge has an unfortunate tendency to throw bus errors as 
witnessed by several messages on the lists in the past few months. Since 
it is a perl script, it is actually perl that has the bus error. You can 
look in ~/Library/Logs/CrashReporter for perl.crash.log. The recipes on 
the lists by people who have had this problem and said to have gotten 
rid of it have a certain voodooesque quality, like installing a 
different perl package and reinstalling intltool. I suspect it could be 
a prebinding problem. Try to run


sudo /sw/var/lib/fink/prebound/update-package-prebinding.pl -f

and see if it changes anything.

--
Martin



---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

[Fink-users] Problem with kxmleditor

[arouner]

Hello,

I installed kxmleditor via fink today, but when I tried to launch it with
"kxmleditor &" I had the following result:

$kxmleditor &
[1] 1127
$ dyld: kxmleditor Undefined symbols:
/sw/lib/libkdefx.4.dylib undefined reference to _sqrtf expected to be
defined in /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib

[1]+  Trace/BPT trap  kxmleditor


Thanks in advance,

Andrew

A. Andrew Rouner
E-MAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] libgnome2-2.10.0-1 failed configure step

[Viv Kendon]

On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Matthew Sachs wrote:


On Jun 20, 2005, at 12:26, Viv Kendon wrote:

Cool, thanks, that one now builds too.  But meanwhile a new fort77 came 
through, and that does not:


There was a problem with my patch file.  I've fixed it, try selfupdate.


It now installs just fine, many thanks.
-- Viv

Dr Viv Kendon   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quantum Information   tel: 0113 343 3897
Physics & Astronomy  University of Leeds
 http://quantum.leeds.ac.uk/~viv


---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

[Fink-users] a solution to SelfUpdate.pm "uninitialized value" error

[Frankie]

I signed up for this list intending to ask for help, but
 a few minutes later I figured it out. Here it is:

If someone tries to run fink selfupdate but gets this...
 "Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at
/sw/lib/perl5/Fink/SelfUpdate.pm line ***"
 (where *** may vary, I got stuck at line 661)

...the problem may be that their /sw directory tree is owned
 by the user rather than root. The error stopped after I did
 sudo chown -R root:admin /sw

-F.


---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] libgnome2-2.10.0-1 failed configure step

[Matthew Sachs]

On Jun 20, 2005, at 12:26, Viv Kendon wrote:


I just uploaded new .info for that one. Thanks for catching it (I
won't have access to fort77 on my test machine for a few days:(



Cool, thanks, that one now builds too.  But meanwhile a new fort77  
came through, and that does not:


There was a problem with my patch file.  I've fixed it, try selfupdate.


---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] libgnome2-2.10.0-1 failed configure step

[Viv Kendon]

On Sun, 19 Jun 2005, Daniel Macks wrote:


On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 08:33:46PM +0100, Viv Kendon wrote:

On Sat, 18 Jun 2005, Daniel Macks wrote:


There's a bug in ./configure or libtool that causes a fork-bomb with
fort77.


Failed: phase compiling: libgnomeui2-2.6.1.1-11 failed


I just uploaded new .info for that one. Thanks for catching it (I
won't have access to fort77 on my test machine for a few days:(


Cool, thanks, that one now builds too.  But meanwhile a new 
fort77 came through, and that does not:


Setting up fink-buildlock-fort77-1.18-17 (2005.06.20-20.06.18) ...
gzip -dc /sw/src/fort77-1.18.tar.gz | /sw/bin/tar -xf -  --no-same-owner --no-same-permissions 
sed 's||/sw|g' < /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/languages/fort77.patch | patch -p1

patching file fort77
patching file tests/fort77
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] 
Apply anyway? [n] 
Skipping patch.

3 out of 3 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file tests/fort77.rej
### execution of sed failed, exit code 1
Removing build lock...
dpkg -r fink-buildlock-fort77-1.18-17
(Reading database ... 84132 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing fink-buildlock-fort77-1.18-17 ...
Failed: phase patching: fort77-1.18-17 failed

Have added maintainer to Cc...
-- Viv

Dr Viv Kendon   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quantum Information   tel: 0113 343 3897
Physics & Astronomy  University of Leeds
 http://quantum.leeds.ac.uk/~viv


---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] No debconf_1.4.42.tar.gz on earth? can not find debconf 1.4.42

[Daniel Macks]

On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 09:44:20AM -0400, Chris Zubrzycki wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> On Jun 20, 2005, at 6:30 AM, Christoph Ewering wrote:
> 
> >Hello!
> >
> >Since one week fink wants to install debconf 1.4.42, but it can not  
> >download it from any server. I just looked at http://ftp.debian.org/ 
> >debian/pool/main/d/debconf/  and http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ 
> >pool/main/d/debconf/ by my self and there is no version 1.4.42.
> 
> It's on the master mirror, put it there myself.

So fix the Source URL in the .info. No reason to send users on a wild
goose chase through a pool of servers known not to have the file.

dan

-- 
Daniel Macks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks



---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] Broke msmtp-ssl

[Scott Webster]

> 
> All right, thank you for the information. I do not know however
> whether I'll use debfoster again soon, because although I could
> solve my problem quite easily after all, this game me a fright! :)
> 

Unfortunately it seems that all the tools like this (debfoster,
deborphan...) are not foolproof and can lead to unfortunately cases
like this.  Probably the reason is that some of the installed packages
don't have the correct dependencies or something.  I think that these
programs have to be used very carefully... you should probably look at
their suggestions and then do some investigation to make sure that the
proposed changes are safe.

I also like to have a relatively "clean" system, but usually keeping
unneeded packages causes no problems, so it's safer to leave things
installed if in doubt.

Scott


---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] Problem with selfupdate

[David R. Morrison]

On Jun 17, 2005, at 6:34 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:


Micha Mutschler wrote:
[]


 mlib.c: In function 'buffer_write':
 mlib.c:179: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of  
'sprintf' differ

in signedness
 mlib.c:192: error: invalid lvalue in assignment


[]


 Failed: phase compiling: dpkg-1.10.21-216 failed



This is a case where upgrading to Xcode-2.1 might help. I am seeing:

mlib.c:192: warning: target of assignment not really an lvalue;  
this will be a hard error in the future


In this case, the future is perhaps already past.

OTOH, the debian folks have seen this error, too, and found a  
simple fix; maybe it should applied in Fink's dpkg also? http:// 
lists.debian.org/debian-dpkg/2004/12/msg00016.html



This patch has been added in dpkg-1.10.21-217, which should hopefully  
resolve this problem.


  -- Dave



---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

[Fink-users] Slightly different libgnome error

[Bart Silverstrim]

I saw someone was having problems with fort77 installed at the same 
time.  I don't think that's the problem I'm running into 
though...fort77 is not listed as installed.


Latest 10.3 with patches
fink --version yields:
Package manager version: 0.24.7
Distribution version: 0.7.2.rsync

Copyright (c) 2001 Christoph Pfisterer
Copyright (c) 2001-2005 The Fink Package Manager Team
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
GNU General Public License for more details.


(much snippage)
libpopt.0.dylib
creating gnome-open
Making all in monikers
/bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile gcc-3.3 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. 
-I.. -DORBIT2=1 -I/sw/include -I/sw/include/glib-2.0 
-I/sw/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/sw/include/orbit-2.0 
-I/sw/include/gconf/2 -I/sw/include/bonobo-activation-2.0 
-I/sw/include/libbonobo-2.0 -I/sw/include/gnome-vfs-2.0 
-I/sw/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/include   -DG_LOG_DOMAIN=\"libgnome\" 
-DVERSION=\"2.10.0\"  -no-cpp-precomp -I/sw/include  -O3 -funroll-loops 
-fstrict-aliasing -c -o bonobo-config-bag.lo `test -f 
'bonobo-config-bag.c' || echo './'`bonobo-config-bag.c

mkdir .libs
 gcc-3.3 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -DORBIT2=1 -I/sw/include 
-I/sw/include/glib-2.0 -I/sw/lib/glib-2.0/include 
-I/sw/include/orbit-2.0 -I/sw/include/gconf/2 
-I/sw/include/bonobo-activation-2.0 -I/sw/include/libbonobo-2.0 
-I/sw/include/gnome-vfs-2.0 -I/sw/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/include 
-DG_LOG_DOMAIN=\"libgnome\" -DVERSION=\"2.10.0\" -no-cpp-precomp 
-I/sw/include -O3 -funroll-loops -fstrict-aliasing -c 
bonobo-config-bag.c  -fno-common -DPIC -o .libs/bonobo-config-bag.o
 gcc-3.3 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -DORBIT2=1 -I/sw/include 
-I/sw/include/glib-2.0 -I/sw/lib/glib-2.0/include 
-I/sw/include/orbit-2.0 -I/sw/include/gconf/2 
-I/sw/include/bonobo-activation-2.0 -I/sw/include/libbonobo-2.0 
-I/sw/include/gnome-vfs-2.0 -I/sw/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/include 
-DG_LOG_DOMAIN=\"libgnome\" -DVERSION=\"2.10.0\" -no-cpp-precomp 
-I/sw/include -O3 -funroll-loops -fstrict-aliasing -c 
bonobo-config-bag.c -o bonobo-config-bag.o >/dev/null 2>&1
/bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile gcc-3.3 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. 
-I.. -DORBIT2=1 -I/sw/include -I/sw/include/glib-2.0 
-I/sw/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/sw/include/orbit-2.0 
-I/sw/include/gconf/2 -I/sw/include/bonobo-activation-2.0 
-I/sw/include/libbonobo-2.0 -I/sw/include/gnome-vfs-2.0 
-I/sw/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/include   -DG_LOG_DOMAIN=\"libgnome\" 
-DVERSION=\"2.10.0\"  -no-cpp-precomp -I/sw/include  -O3 -funroll-loops 
-fstrict-aliasing -c -o bonobo-moniker-config.lo `test -f 
'bonobo-moniker-config.c' || echo './'`bonobo-moniker-config.c
 gcc-3.3 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -DORBIT2=1 -I/sw/include 
-I/sw/include/glib-2.0 -I/sw/lib/glib-2.0/include 
-I/sw/include/orbit-2.0 -I/sw/include/gconf/2 
-I/sw/include/bonobo-activation-2.0 -I/sw/include/libbonobo-2.0 
-I/sw/include/gnome-vfs-2.0 -I/sw/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/include 
-DG_LOG_DOMAIN=\"libgnome\" -DVERSION=\"2.10.0\" -no-cpp-precomp 
-I/sw/include -O3 -funroll-loops -fstrict-aliasing -c 
bonobo-moniker-config.c  -fno-common -DPIC -o 
.libs/bonobo-moniker-config.o
 gcc-3.3 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -DORBIT2=1 -I/sw/include 
-I/sw/include/glib-2.0 -I/sw/lib/glib-2.0/include 
-I/sw/include/orbit-2.0 -I/sw/include/gconf/2 
-I/sw/include/bonobo-activation-2.0 -I/sw/include/libbonobo-2.0 
-I/sw/include/gnome-vfs-2.0 -I/sw/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/include 
-DG_LOG_DOMAIN=\"libgnome\" -DVERSION=\"2.10.0\" -no-cpp-precomp 
-I/sw/include -O3 -funroll-loops -fstrict-aliasing -c 
bonobo-moniker-config.c -o bonobo-moniker-config.o >/dev/null 2>&1
/bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile gcc-3.3 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. 
-I.. -DORBIT2=1 -I/sw/include -I/sw/include/glib-2.0 
-I/sw/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/sw/include/orbit-2.0 
-I/sw/include/gconf/2 -I/sw/include/bonobo-activation-2.0 
-I/sw/include/libbonobo-2.0 -I/sw/include/gnome-vfs-2.0 
-I/sw/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/include   -DG_LOG_DOMAIN=\"libgnome\" 
-DVERSION=\"2.10.0\"  -no-cpp-precomp -I/sw/include  -O3 -funroll-loops 
-fstrict-aliasing -c -o bonobo-moniker-conf-indirect.lo `test -f 
'bonobo-moniker-conf-indirect.c' || echo 
'./'`bonobo-moniker-conf-indirect.c
 gcc-3.3 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -DORBIT2=1 -I/sw/include 
-I/sw/include/glib-2.0 -I/sw/lib/glib-2.0/include 
-I/sw/include/orbit-2.0 -I/sw/include/gconf/2 
-I/sw/include/bonobo-activation-2.0 -I/sw/include/libbonobo-2.0 
-I/sw/include/gnome-vfs-2.0 -I/sw/lib/gnome-vfs-2.0/include 
-DG_LOG_DOMAIN=\"libgnome\" -DVERSION=\"2.10.0\" -no-cpp-precomp 
-I/sw/include -O3 -funroll-loops -fstrict-aliasing -c 
bonobo-moniker-conf-indirect.c  -fno-common -DPIC -o 
.libs/bonobo-moniker-conf-indirect.o
 gcc-3.3 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -DORBIT2=1 -I/sw/include 
-I/sw/include/glib-2.0 -I/sw/lib/glib-2.0/include 
-I/sw/include/orbit-2.0 -I/sw/include/gconf/2 
-I/sw/include/bonobo-activati

Re: [Fink-users] No debconf_1.4.42.tar.gz on earth? can not find debconf 1.4.42

[Chris Zubrzycki]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


On Jun 20, 2005, at 6:30 AM, Christoph Ewering wrote:


Hello!

Since one week fink wants to install debconf 1.4.42, but it can not  
download it from any server. I just looked at http://ftp.debian.org/ 
debian/pool/main/d/debconf/  and http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ 
pool/main/d/debconf/ by my self and there is no version 1.4.42.

It's on the master mirror, put it there myself.


- -chris zubrzycki
- - --
PGP public key: http://homepage.mac.com/beren/publickey.txt
ID: 0xA2ABC070
Fingerprint: 26B0 BA6B A409 FA83 42B3  1688 FBF9 8232 A2AB C070

Security Is A Series Of Well-Defined Steps...

chmod -R 0 / ; and smile :)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin)
Comment: Please sign reply-http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkK2yDcACgkQ+/mCMqKrwHDgQACfTX1v3fPfIdymyCuJQfNxeLZD
nz0AoMJxX8a9yFUQEDaqsnJRGQOqz37m
=CCfO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] Broke msmtp-ssl

[Clemence Magnien]

On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 08:31:15PM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> []
> >/bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc  -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE
> >-I/sw/include  -I/sw/include  -L/sw/lib -o libgc.la   pkcs5.lo 
> >gc-libgcrypt.lo -L/sw/lib -lgcrypt -L/sw/lib -lgpg-error  -lz
> >grep: c: No such file or directory
> >sed: /sw/lib/libpth.la: No such file or directory
> >libtool: link: `/sw/lib/libpth.la' is not a valid libtool archive
> []
> >Failed: phase compiling: gnutls-1.2.4-1 failed
> 
> Try another selfupdate. Two days ago, gnutls got a build dependency on 
> pth which makes sure that /sw_unstable/lib/libgcrypt.la is always 
> present when you build gnutls.

Okay, I did a selfupdate and 'fink install gnutls' worked fine.

Thanks,
Clemence




---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] Broke msmtp-ssl

[Clemence Magnien]

On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 09:33:25AM -0400, Richard Cobbe wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 02:28:59PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > a few days ago I saw someone on the list advise the use of debfoster
> > for removing packages that had been installed as dependencies of no
> > longer present packages, and I decided to give it a try, and it broke
> > msmtp-ssl (I can no longer use it nor rebuild it).
> 
> Yes, I think that was me.  Sorry my suggestion led to trouble for you.

Don't apologize, it's not your fault, and there was no harm done
(just a big fright for me before I understood how to set things
right).

> 
> > First, debfoster seems to have removed (at least) one package
> > needed for msmtp, because when I try to send an e-mail I get
> > the following error message:
> > dyld: msmtp can't open library: /sw/lib/libgsasl.7.dylib  (No such file or
> > +directory, errno = 2)
> > 
> > (indeed I remember debfoster proposing me to remove packages with
> > gsasl9 in their names, and I accepted)
> 
> That sounds like msmtp-ssl is missing a dependency or two.  (I vaguely
> recall experiencing this myself, several months back.)  Send an email to
> the msmtp-ssl maintainer letting them know about this.

OK, thanks for the tip, I contacted the maintainer.

> > Additionally, I would like to know if there are any special
> > precautions to take when using debfoster? Did I do something
> > wrong when using it? (I just launched the command 'debfoster'
> > and answered yes or no when it prompted me to keep or remove
> > packages)
> 
> No, that's pretty much how you use it.  In general, no precautions are
> necessary beyond those that you should generally take when performing
> system administration tasks.

All right, thank you for the information. I do not know however
whether I'll use debfoster again soon, because although I could
solve my problem quite easily after all, this game me a fright! :)

Cheers,
Clemence




---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

[Fink-users] Problem compiling tetex...

[Antonio Di Ferdinando]

Hi,let's summarize: I was going to install Octave on my system. I started to install it and, at a certain point, I had an error where it couldn't find "tex". Somebody suggested me to install tetex-base. I was installing it right now and, after a hour of installation or so, I had this error:/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-apple-darwin8/4.0.0/../../../libm.dylib(scandir.So) definition of _scandir/usr/bin/ld: Undefined symbols:_maxrugnumcollect2: ld returned 1 exit statusmake[2]: *** [aleph] Error 1make[1]: *** [all] Error 1make: *** [all] Error 1### execution of make failed, exit code 2Failed: compiling tetex-3.0-1 failedSomebody could help me to understand why it fails to compile? I'm on a Tiger system, with gcc 4.Thanks in advance.Antonio.

Re: [Fink-users] gtk+2-2.6.7-2 compile fails

[Michèle Garoche]

Le 20 juin 2005 à 12:04, Claus Atzenbeck a écrit :


On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Claus Atzenbeck wrote:



Hopefully you did not fink selfupdate after rebuilding gtk+2.



I don't remember whether I did a selfupdate since building gtk+2.



I just realized that according to the file date, I did a selfupdate  
this

morning:

$ ls -l /sw/fink/10.4-transitional/unstable/main/finkinfo/gnome/gtk 
+2.patch
-rw-r--r--1 root admin9988 Jun 20 08:01 /sw/fink/ 
10.4-transitional/unstable/main/finkinfo/gnome/gtk+2.patc
Actually, it seems that Xcode2 or 2.1 installed, that's the new  
version which makes things compiled.



Cheers,
Michèle





---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

[Fink-users] No debconf_1.4.42.tar.gz on earth? can not find debconf 1.4.42

[Christoph Ewering]

Hello!

Since one week fink wants to install debconf 1.4.42, but it can not  
download it from any server. I just looked at http://ftp.debian.org/ 
debian/pool/main/d/debconf/  and http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/ 
main/d/debconf/ by my self and there is no version 1.4.42.


Bye,
Christoph



---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] gtk+2-2.6.7-2 compile fails

[Claus Atzenbeck]

On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Michèle Garoche wrote:

> Could you see if in your tree gtk+2.patch has something like this at the end:
> +#ifdef HAVE_STDINT_H
> +#include 
> +#endif
> +
> #include "xdgmimecache.h"
> #include "xdgmimeint.h"

Yes. This is the end of
/sw/fink/10.4-transitional/unstable/main/finkinfo/gnome/gtk+2.patch:


+#ifdef HAVE_STDINT_H
+#include 
+#endif
+
 #include "xdgmimecache.h"
 #include "xdgmimeint.h"


> Hopefully you did not fink selfupdate after rebuilding gtk+2.

I don't remember whether I did a selfupdate since building gtk+2.

Hope this helps...
Claus

Re: [Fink-users] gtk+2-2.6.7-2 compile fails

[Claus Atzenbeck]

On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Claus Atzenbeck wrote:

> > Hopefully you did not fink selfupdate after rebuilding gtk+2.
>
> I don't remember whether I did a selfupdate since building gtk+2.

I just realized that according to the file date, I did a selfupdate this
morning:

$ ls -l /sw/fink/10.4-transitional/unstable/main/finkinfo/gnome/gtk+2.patch
-rw-r--r--1 root admin9988 Jun 20 08:01 
/sw/fink/10.4-transitional/unstable/main/finkinfo/gnome/gtk+2.patc

Claus


---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Bulk] Re: [Fink-users] gtk+2-2.6.7-2 compile fails

[Kevin Horton]

On 20 Jun 2005, at 5:12, Michèle Garoche wrote:Le 20 juin 2005 à 04:03, Kevin Horton a écrit :I'm running unstable fink on Tiger, undated a few minutes ago.gtk+2-2.6.7-2 will not compile.  It fails as:[snip]==% fink --versionPackage manager version: 0.24.7Distribution version: 0.8.0.rsync% sw_versProductName:    Mac OS XProductVersion: 10.4.1BuildVersion:   8B15Which Xcode version? I'm using Xcode 2.I selfupdated again a few minutes ago, and the new version has built OK. Kevin HortonOttawa, Canada 

Re: [Fink-users] gtk+2-2.6.7-2 compile fails

[Michèle Garoche]

Le 20 juin 2005 à 10:22, Claus Atzenbeck a écrit :


On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Michèle Garoche wrote:



Le 20 juin 2005 à 04:03, Kevin Horton a écrit :



I'm running unstable fink on Tiger, undated a few minutes ago.

gtk+2-2.6.7-2 will not compile.  It fails as:


[snip]
Kevin, Daniel has just uploaded a new version of gtk+2. See if it  
works now

for you and report please (also if it works :).



I had the same problems yesterday. However, after upgrading to  
Xcode 2.1,

gtk+ compiled without problems.
Could you see if in your tree gtk+2.patch has something like this at  
the end:

+#ifdef HAVE_STDINT_H
+#include 
+#endif
+
#include "xdgmimecache.h"
#include "xdgmimeint.h"

Hopefully you did not fink selfupdate after rebuilding gtk+2.

Cheers,
Michèle





---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users

Re: [Fink-users] gtk+2-2.6.7-2 compile fails

[Michèle Garoche]

Le 20 juin 2005 à 04:03, Kevin Horton a écrit :I'm running unstable fink on Tiger, undated a few minutes ago.gtk+2-2.6.7-2 will not compile.  It fails as:[snip]==% fink --versionPackage manager version: 0.24.7Distribution version: 0.8.0.rsync% sw_versProductName:    Mac OS XProductVersion: 10.4.1BuildVersion:   8B15Which Xcode version? Cheers,Michèle 

Re: [Fink-users] gtk+2-2.6.7-2 compile fails

[Claus Atzenbeck]

On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Michèle Garoche wrote:

> Le 20 juin 2005 à 04:03, Kevin Horton a écrit :
>
> > I'm running unstable fink on Tiger, undated a few minutes ago.
> >
> > gtk+2-2.6.7-2 will not compile.  It fails as:
> [snip]
> Kevin, Daniel has just uploaded a new version of gtk+2. See if it works now
> for you and report please (also if it works :).

I had the same problems yesterday. However, after upgrading to Xcode 2.1,
gtk+ compiled without problems.

Greetings,
Claus

Re: [Fink-users] gtk+2-2.6.7-2 compile fails

[Michèle Garoche]

Le 20 juin 2005 à 04:03, Kevin Horton a écrit :


I'm running unstable fink on Tiger, undated a few minutes ago.

gtk+2-2.6.7-2 will not compile.  It fails as:

[snip]
Kevin, Daniel has just uploaded a new version of gtk+2. See if it  
works now for you and report please (also if it works :).


Cheers,
Michèle





---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=click
___
Fink-users mailing list
Fink-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-users