RE: [flexcoders] Re: transient properties of an object using RemoteClass
I believe so, first time I see it myself, never seen anything like this for
Flex 2.
Dimitrios Gianninas
RIA Developer and Team Lead
Optimal Payments Inc.
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
simonjpalmer
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 10:48 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: transient properties of an object using RemoteClass
Wait... this is 3, I am on 2...
I can't find a reference to this in Flex 2, is it a new feature of 3?
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com ,
ben.clinkinbeard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://livedocs.adobe.com/labs/flex/3/html/wwhelp/wwhimpl/common/html/wwhelp.htm?context=LiveDocs_Book_Partsfile=metadata_066_15.html
http://livedocs.adobe.com/labs/flex/3/html/wwhelp/wwhimpl/common/html/wwhelp.htm?context=LiveDocs_Book_Partsfile=metadata_066_15.html
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com ,
simonjpalmer simonjpalmer@
wrote:
I have a situation where I have a deliberate mismatch between my AS3
and Java objects.
I have a Java object
package com.java
class X
{
private String name;
public String getName(){return name;}
public void setName(String name){this.name=name;}
}
and an ActionScript object
package com.as3
{
[Managed]
[RemoteClass(alias=com.java.X)]
public class X
{
private var name:String;
private var age:Number;
}
}
this all works great and my X.name gets transported back and forth
reliably, however when data is transmitted from client to server I get
a warning message from the framework on the server which says...
Ignoring set property age for type com.as3.X as a setter could not be
found.
This means that the age property was transmitted unnecessarily. Not a
problem for a primitive like a Number, but a real problem if age
contained an array of objects.
What I think I need is something like the transient keyword in Java
object persistence which causes a property not to be considered for
persistence, or in this case transmission.
Does any such thing exist, or is there another way of doing this?
Thanks
--
WARNING
---
This electronic message and its attachments may contain confidential,
proprietary or legally privileged information, which is solely for the use of
the intended recipient. No privilege or other rights are waived by any
unintended transmission or unauthorized retransmission of this message. If you
are not the intended recipient of this message, or if you have received it in
error, you should immediately stop reading this message and delete it and all
attachments from your system. The reading, distribution, copying or other use
of this message or its attachments by unintended recipients is unauthorized and
may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
sender.
AVIS IMPORTANT
--
Ce message électronique et ses pièces jointes peuvent contenir des
renseignements confidentiels, exclusifs ou légalement privilégiés destinés au
seul usage du destinataire visé. L'expéditeur original ne renonce à aucun
privilège ou à aucun autre droit si le présent message a été transmis
involontairement ou s'il est retransmis sans son autorisation. Si vous n'êtes
pas le destinataire visé du présent message ou si vous l'avez reçu par erreur,
veuillez cesser immédiatement de le lire et le supprimer, ainsi que toutes ses
pièces jointes, de votre système. La lecture, la distribution, la copie ou
tout autre usage du présent message ou de ses pièces jointes par des personnes
autres que le destinataire visé ne sont pas autorisés et pourraient être
illégaux. Si vous avez reçu ce courrier électronique par erreur, veuillez en
aviser l'expéditeur.
[flexcoders] Re: transient properties of an object using RemoteClass
Wait... this is 3, I am on 2...
I can't find a reference to this in Flex 2, is it a new feature of 3?
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, ben.clinkinbeard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://livedocs.adobe.com/labs/flex/3/html/wwhelp/wwhimpl/common/html/wwhelp.htm?context=LiveDocs_Book_Partsfile=metadata_066_15.html
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, simonjpalmer simonjpalmer@
wrote:
I have a situation where I have a deliberate mismatch between my AS3
and Java objects.
I have a Java object
package com.java
class X
{
private String name;
public String getName(){return name;}
public void setName(String name){this.name=name;}
}
and an ActionScript object
package com.as3
{
[Managed]
[RemoteClass(alias=com.java.X)]
public class X
{
private var name:String;
private var age:Number;
}
}
this all works great and my X.name gets transported back and forth
reliably, however when data is transmitted from client to server I get
a warning message from the framework on the server which says...
Ignoring set property age for type com.as3.X as a setter could not be
found.
This means that the age property was transmitted unnecessarily. Not a
problem for a primitive like a Number, but a real problem if age
contained an array of objects.
What I think I need is something like the transient keyword in Java
object persistence which causes a property not to be considered for
persistence, or in this case transmission.
Does any such thing exist, or is there another way of doing this?
Thanks
[flexcoders] Re: transient properties of an object using RemoteClass
Nah, looks like it was just undocumented in 2:
http://nondocs.blogspot.com/2007/04/metadatatransient.html
http://www.darronschall.com/weblog/archives/000271.cfm
HTH,
Ben
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, simonjpalmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Wait... this is 3, I am on 2...
I can't find a reference to this in Flex 2, is it a new feature of 3?
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, ben.clinkinbeard
ben.clinkinbeard@ wrote:
http://livedocs.adobe.com/labs/flex/3/html/wwhelp/wwhimpl/common/html/wwhelp.htm?context=LiveDocs_Book_Partsfile=metadata_066_15.html
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, simonjpalmer simonjpalmer@
wrote:
I have a situation where I have a deliberate mismatch between my AS3
and Java objects.
I have a Java object
package com.java
class X
{
private String name;
public String getName(){return name;}
public void setName(String name){this.name=name;}
}
and an ActionScript object
package com.as3
{
[Managed]
[RemoteClass(alias=com.java.X)]
public class X
{
private var name:String;
private var age:Number;
}
}
this all works great and my X.name gets transported back and forth
reliably, however when data is transmitted from client to server
I get
a warning message from the framework on the server which says...
Ignoring set property age for type com.as3.X as a setter could
not be
found.
This means that the age property was transmitted unnecessarily.
Not a
problem for a primitive like a Number, but a real problem if age
contained an array of objects.
What I think I need is something like the transient keyword in
Java
object persistence which causes a property not to be considered for
persistence, or in this case transmission.
Does any such thing exist, or is there another way of doing this?
Thanks
[flexcoders] Re: transient properties of an object using RemoteClass
Thanks!
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, ben.clinkinbeard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://livedocs.adobe.com/labs/flex/3/html/wwhelp/wwhimpl/common/html/wwhelp.htm?context=LiveDocs_Book_Partsfile=metadata_066_15.html
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, simonjpalmer simonjpalmer@
wrote:
I have a situation where I have a deliberate mismatch between my AS3
and Java objects.
I have a Java object
package com.java
class X
{
private String name;
public String getName(){return name;}
public void setName(String name){this.name=name;}
}
and an ActionScript object
package com.as3
{
[Managed]
[RemoteClass(alias=com.java.X)]
public class X
{
private var name:String;
private var age:Number;
}
}
this all works great and my X.name gets transported back and forth
reliably, however when data is transmitted from client to server I get
a warning message from the framework on the server which says...
Ignoring set property age for type com.as3.X as a setter could not be
found.
This means that the age property was transmitted unnecessarily. Not a
problem for a primitive like a Number, but a real problem if age
contained an array of objects.
What I think I need is something like the transient keyword in Java
object persistence which causes a property not to be considered for
persistence, or in this case transmission.
Does any such thing exist, or is there another way of doing this?
Thanks
[flexcoders] Re: transient properties of an object using RemoteClass
The FB2 syntax hilighter ignores it, but I can confirm that it exists
and works in Flex 2. Makes you wonder why it wasn't in the docs...
Thanks for your help. This just cut my packet size by about 75% and
simplified my client code significantly.
I'm a very happy man.
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, ben.clinkinbeard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nah, looks like it was just undocumented in 2:
http://nondocs.blogspot.com/2007/04/metadatatransient.html
http://www.darronschall.com/weblog/archives/000271.cfm
HTH,
Ben
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, simonjpalmer simonjpalmer@
wrote:
Wait... this is 3, I am on 2...
I can't find a reference to this in Flex 2, is it a new feature of 3?
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, ben.clinkinbeard
ben.clinkinbeard@ wrote:
http://livedocs.adobe.com/labs/flex/3/html/wwhelp/wwhimpl/common/html/wwhelp.htm?context=LiveDocs_Book_Partsfile=metadata_066_15.html
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, simonjpalmer simonjpalmer@
wrote:
I have a situation where I have a deliberate mismatch between
my AS3
and Java objects.
I have a Java object
package com.java
class X
{
private String name;
public String getName(){return name;}
public void setName(String name){this.name=name;}
}
and an ActionScript object
package com.as3
{
[Managed]
[RemoteClass(alias=com.java.X)]
public class X
{
private var name:String;
private var age:Number;
}
}
this all works great and my X.name gets transported back and forth
reliably, however when data is transmitted from client to server
I get
a warning message from the framework on the server which says...
Ignoring set property age for type com.as3.X as a setter could
not be
found.
This means that the age property was transmitted unnecessarily.
Not a
problem for a primitive like a Number, but a real problem if age
contained an array of objects.
What I think I need is something like the transient keyword in
Java
object persistence which causes a property not to be
considered for
persistence, or in this case transmission.
Does any such thing exist, or is there another way of doing
this?
Thanks
[flexcoders] Re: transient properties of an object using RemoteClass
http://livedocs.adobe.com/labs/flex/3/html/wwhelp/wwhimpl/common/html/wwhelp.htm?context=LiveDocs_Book_Partsfile=metadata_066_15.html
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, simonjpalmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have a situation where I have a deliberate mismatch between my AS3
and Java objects.
I have a Java object
package com.java
class X
{
private String name;
public String getName(){return name;}
public void setName(String name){this.name=name;}
}
and an ActionScript object
package com.as3
{
[Managed]
[RemoteClass(alias=com.java.X)]
public class X
{
private var name:String;
private var age:Number;
}
}
this all works great and my X.name gets transported back and forth
reliably, however when data is transmitted from client to server I get
a warning message from the framework on the server which says...
Ignoring set property age for type com.as3.X as a setter could not be
found.
This means that the age property was transmitted unnecessarily. Not a
problem for a primitive like a Number, but a real problem if age
contained an array of objects.
What I think I need is something like the transient keyword in Java
object persistence which causes a property not to be considered for
persistence, or in this case transmission.
Does any such thing exist, or is there another way of doing this?
Thanks
