Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 80, Issue 8
I have had no contact with them either by phone or otherwise. http://equipe-flightgear.forumactif.com/t899p30-pour-une-meilleur-integration-des-travaux-de-la-paf-dans-flightgear#15971 In English the last line is let me know when you're ready and I call him http://equipe-flightgear.forumactif.com/t899p45-pour-une-meilleur-integration-des-travaux-de-la-paf-dans-flightgear#16025 In English the second line is I've just talked during a long time with Emmanuel (more than one hour !!!) leaves IRC very quickly when I arrive ??? hmmm someone can explain me ? Emilian ? James ? Christian ? Gijs ? Jean ? David ? Anders ? Have I left IRC because helijah was connected on IRC ? I never removed the header indicating the authors Some example : Original file created by PAF team : https://gitorious.org/paf/fgdata/blobs/master/Aircraft/DR400-jsbSim/Dialogs/checklist/checklists-text.xml File currently on GIT repo : http://mapserver.flightgear.org/git/?p=fgdata;a=blob;f=Aircraft/DR400/Dialogs/checklist/checklists-text.xml;h=a60d0954b08d8a7e71a802c191e71c96a15f55e6;hb=HEAD Original file created by PAF team : https://gitorious.org/paf/fgdata/blobs/master/Aircraft/DR400-jsbSim/Models/Interior/Handle/handle.xml File currently on GIT repo : http://mapserver.flightgear.org/git/?p=fgdata;a=blob;f=Aircraft/DR400/Models/Interior/Handle/handle.xml;h=d9aa7be75d5a201ab32e384d4ab7c7587150cabf;hb=HEAD Original file created by PAF team : https://gitorious.org/paf/fgdata/blobs/master/Aircraft/DR400-jsbSim/Models/Interior/Panel/Parts/fuel-valve/fuel-valve.xml File currently on GIT repo : http://mapserver.flightgear.org/git/?p=fgdata;a=blob;f=Aircraft/DR400/Models/Interior/Panel/Parts/fuel-valve/fuel-valve.xml;h=d162e7bef1bda983df51f7949afbc3e244b129cc;hb=HEAD Original file created by PAF team : https://gitorious.org/paf/fgdata/blobs/master/Aircraft/DR400-jsbSim/Nasal/dr400.nas File currently on GIT repo : http://mapserver.flightgear.org/git/?p=fgdata;a=blob;f=Aircraft/DR400/Nasal/dr400.nas;h=c27fa190acac2ecbda8de3539a81fd57c0e30063;hb=HEAD Original file created by PAF team : https://gitorious.org/paf/fgdata/blobs/master/Aircraft/DR400-jsbSim/Nasal/electrical.nas File currently on GIT repo : http://mapserver.flightgear.org/git/?p=fgdata;a=blob;f=Aircraft/DR400/Nasal/electrical.nas;h=195a5ad1a6a31076ca8a0c66563a8b4687de6a30;hb=HEAD Should I continue ? In the 3 first examples this is missing : !-- # DR400-jsbSim by PAF team # April 2012 : Modified by PAF team # http://equipe-flightgear.forumactif.com ##-- In the 2 last examples the header copyright has been changed : the destinated project of my contribution is now DR400 and the forum URL of PAF team is removed from dr400.nas / replaced by my personal website URL ( ??? ) from electrical.nas Firstly my contribution was originaly written for the DR400-jsbSim project (Imagine that profightsim change the header of the file from This file is part of FlightGear by This file is part of proflightsim... here is exactly the same) Secondly I don't understand why my personal website URL is in these files ! My personal life has nothing to do with these file. I use my website for personal and professional use and I've never wanted to see this URL in these files. Currently the GIT repo is not GPL compliant at all... Now I leave you conclude and make what is necessary in order to stop all of these. Cheers, Clément -- LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] mismatching SimGear version 2.9.0 instead of 2.10.0
-Original Message- From: mer...@centrum.cz Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 7:08 AM To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Flightgear-devel] mismatching SimGear version 2.9.0 instead of 2.10.0 Hi, can someone please help me fix this problem? ./download_and_compile.sh FGFS UPDATE ... -- found SimGear version: 2.9.0 (needed 2.10.0) CMake Error at CMakeModules/FindSimGear.cmake:112 (message): You have installed a mismatching SimGear version 2.9.0 instead of 2.10.0 as required by FlightGear. When using multiple SimGear installations, please use 'SIMGEAR_DIR' to select the SimGear library location to be used. Call Stack (most recent call first): CMakeLists.txt:234 (find_package) -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! make: *** [cmake_check_build_system] Error 1 Thanks Martin M. -- First run Cmake on simgear and compile/install. Then you can repeat this with flightgear. The important part is the cmake with simgear, as this is the step which puts the new version number into the code. Alan -- LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] (JSBsim) body accelerations
Hi, On Wednesday, December 19, 2012 15:48:40 James Turner wrote: // accels, set that to zero for now. // Angular accelerations are missing from the interface anyway, // linear accelerations are screwed up at least for JSBSim. // motionInfo.linearAccel = SG_FEET_TO_METER*SGVec3f(ifce.get_U_dot_body(), ifce.get_V_dot_body(), ifce.get_W_dot_body()); The JSBSim values aren't screwed up, I think, just including other non-inertial terms which YASim does not. Since it's the inertial accelerations I want to sense in the instruments, that's why I will tweak the JSBSim-FGFS interface and not YASim. Well, to streamline the interfacing this might be a good idea. For the motion onfo part, I can well think of removing the accelerations from the motion info. Over time, it turned out that the velocities are sufficient to transfer. I am currently not sure if the multiplayer code currently makes use of my latest thoughts about this kind of interpolations, but I would think that we can just remove the accelerations from fgfs internal multiplayer code. The multiplayer udp packet needs to stay as is. Just pack zeros there ... Greetings Mathias -- LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgdata Commit c8a69dffd49a298e01c0e0e1320f4a1d49a0bca4
Hangars are discussed in the wiki article actually ( http://wiki.flightgear.org/FlightGear_Git:_splitting_fgdata#Per-aircraft_project ) . That's why I pointed to it. Lots of ideas that show up on the mailinglist have been discussed in the past and the outcome of those discussions is mentioned at the wiki. First reading the wiki before sharing your own (good) ideas or opinions saves everyone's time, not at the least yours ;-) Your question about James' system is a good one. I'm interested in that too! Gijs -- LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] mismatching SimGear version 2.9.0 instead of2.10.0
Hi. I did ./download_and_compile.sh SIMGEAR UPDATE ./download_and_compile.sh -u ALL fgfs/install/fgfs/fgdata$ git remote update And tried to run fgfs, but got another error. $ ./run_fgfs.sh Base package check failed: Version 2.9.0 found at: /media/mermar/9f01f77f-1876-42cc-9f40-3d048bcd3b3c/fgfs/install/fgfs/fgdata Version 2.10.0 is required. Please upgrade/downgrade base package and set the path to your fgdata with --fg-root=path_to_your_fgdata Uff, why is switching to the new version so difficult? Pleas, what to do now? Martin M. __ Od: Alan Teeder ajtee...@v-twin.org.uk Komu: FlightGear developers discussions flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Datum: 22.12.2012 09:35 Předmět: Re: [Flightgear-devel] mismatching SimGear version 2.9.0 instead of2.10.0 -Original Message- From: mer...@centrum.cz Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 7:08 AM To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Flightgear-devel] mismatching SimGear version 2.9.0 instead of 2.10.0 Hi, can someone please help me fix this problem? ./download_and_compile.sh FGFS UPDATE ... -- found SimGear version: 2.9.0 (needed 2.10.0) CMake Error at CMakeModules/FindSimGear.cmake:112 (message): You have installed a mismatching SimGear version 2.9.0 instead of 2.10.0 as required by FlightGear. When using multiple SimGear installations, please use 'SIMGEAR_DIR' to select the SimGear library location to be used. Call Stack (most recent call first): CMakeLists.txt:234 (find_package) -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! make: *** [cmake_check_build_system] Error 1 Thanks Martin M. -- First run Cmake on simgear and compile/install. Then you can repeat this with flightgear. The important part is the cmake with simgear, as this is the step which puts the new version number into the code. Alan -- LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel -- LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] mismatching SimGear version 2.9.0 instead of2.10.0
Hi Martin, De : mer...@centrum.cz mer...@centrum.cz Envoyé le : Samedi 22 décembre 2012 10h26 Version 2.9.0 found at: /media/mermar/9f01f77f-1876-42cc-9f40-3d048bcd3b3c/fgfs/install/fgfs/fgdata Version 2.10.0 is required. The file named version in your fgdata directory should contain 2.10.0, and it seems it contains 2.9.0. Looks like your fgdata is not updated, or that your configuration points to a old version file. I just did a git pull on my side, and it did the trick. Olivier -- LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgdata Commit c8a69dffd49a298e01c0e0e1320f4a1d49a0bca4
On 22 Dec 2012, at 08:34, Gijs de Rooy gijsr...@hotmail.com wrote: Hangars are discussed in the wiki article actually ( http://wiki.flightgear.org/FlightGear_Git:_splitting_fgdata#Per-aircraft_project ) . That's why I pointed to it. Lots of ideas that show up on the mailinglist have been discussed in the past and the outcome of those discussions is mentioned at the wiki. First reading the wiki before sharing your own (good) ideas or opinions saves everyone's time, not at the least yours ;-) Your question about James' system is a good one. I'm interested in that too! It's been on the back burner but now the NavCache is mostly stable, and Thomas is taking care of the replacement GUI work, I can return to it. Actually I made some odd progress - libSvn has become a problem to support on the Mac, so I extended the HTTP code to become a read-only WebDAV client. It already works (can download from terra sync repository) and it's faster to update, and uses less diskspace (since it can assume the local files are Unmodified). But the initial checkout is currently much slower than libSvn, which I need to fix. But, it will also work for aircraft! So any WebDav or SVN server can be an aircraft hangar, and update automatically. And we already support multiple aircraft dirs, so there is not much work, to combine everything, I hope. The metadata will then simply be the -set.xml files and thumbnail images, extracted into a single file at the root of each 'hangar' repository. BTW I will also upstate my wiki page with my post 2.10 plans since I agree it's useful to share. Personally I think the wiki is better for such data, especially if we can add a category for 'developer plans'. James Gijs -- LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel -- LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] mismatching SimGear version 2.9.0 insteadof2.10.0
Hello. Thanks, after git pulll in fgdata directory, I can run fgfs using ./run_fgfs.sh But no matter what I do with View - Rendering Options (tried almost all combinations), I'v got wrong output. See screenshot http://postimage.org/image/7lgchpfs5/ The same output with two different graphic cards. RV630 [Radeon HD 3600 Series] Cape Verde PRO [Radeon HD 7700 Series] The same output in current Git version and 2.6 version. I'm running 64 bit Ubuntu 12.10 (with Gnome 3) and radeon driver. Any hint how to get usefull output (as in version 2.4)? Thanks Martin M. __ Od: Olivier acom...@yahoo.com Komu: FlightGear developers discussions flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Datum: 22.12.2012 10:38 Předmět: Re: [Flightgear-devel] mismatching SimGear version 2.9.0 insteadof2.10.0 Hi Martin, De : mer...@centrum.cz mer...@centrum.cz Envoyé le : Samedi 22 décembre 2012 10h26 Version 2.9.0 found at: /media/mermar/9f01f77f-1876-42cc-9f40-3d048bcd3b3c/fgfs/install/fgfs/fgdata Version 2.10.0 is required. The file named version in your fgdata directory should contain 2.10.0, and it seems it contains 2.9.0. Looks like your fgdata is not updated, or that your configuration points to a old version file. I just did a git pull on my side, and it did the trick. Olivier -- -- LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d -- ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel -- LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Iceland textures
Sorry for the late reply. I missed your answer, while i was traveling. I habe no problem with editing code and help finding the ati bug, but it will have to wait until i am back from family x-mas. Oliver Am 15.12.2012 08:53 schrieb Renk Thorsten thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi: - no errors on the console - latest drivers for the ati card (tested with all ati drivers from 2012 for win7 64bit) - the artifacts show up if the landmass shader is over 3 (counting from left / starting with 0) - the artefacts show up if the transition shader is over 1 / at 2 only the airport grass is showing the artefacts - the Atmospheric Scattering seems to work as far i can tell and shows no artefacts, water looks good too. - did not try change the shaders while using Atmospheric Scattering before the iceland commit, only used the default values. Hope that helps. Not really. Your card/driver doesn't like *something* of the procedural texturing although the shader compiles fine (you don't get the artefacts when you're running terrain-haze.vert/frag, you do get them whenever you run terrain-haze-detailed.vert/frag). It may be the overlay textures, it may be that the noise function generates values outside the [0..1] range by some weird numerical problem... Does it happen for all landclasses (for instance, agriculture doesn't have overlay textures or bump-mapping) - so in theory some landclasses would never see overlay texture or noise function issues. Does it depend on the values of the dust, snow, vegetation or wetness sliders in any way? Otherwise... if it doesn't throw an error, and if I can't reproduce it and we don't see any dependencies, I am a bit at a loss how to debug it. You could either see if there's any previous version which runs fine (in which case we can debug based on what has changed) or we can try to disable all procedural blocks, and then you have to uncomment them one by one and see when the problem occurs. Let me know if you're interested in the latter option (but it means you have to start editing around in the shader code yourself). * Thorsten -- LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel -- LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgdata Commitc8a69dffd49a298e01c0e0e1320f4a1d49a0bca4
-Original Message- From: HB-GRAL Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 10:31 PM To: FlightGear developers discussions Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgdata Commitc8a69dffd49a298e01c0e0e1320f4a1d49a0bca4 Am 21.12.12 11:49, schrieb Gijs de Rooy: Please see http://wiki.flightgear.org/FlightGear_Git:_splitting_fgdata and feel free to add thoughts/ideas there. A mailing list is not a good place for documenting things. Cheers, Gijs Hi Gijs The problem is that a wiki is not a good place to discuss such things because some people consult this list more frequently than a wiki page. Anyway, when I read this wiki I fear such pages ends up sometimes as cemetery of good ideas which started here and moved over to nowhere ... I´m with Yves on that. The wiki is pretty much stagnant, and seems, to me, to be mainly the ideas of one person. It does not seem like a discussion. There have been several threads on the forum from would be users who are unable to get a working copy of fgdata, which must mean that many mire have just given and gone away. Anyway, here is my suggestion. Firstly populate fgdata with a bare minimum of aircraft . A starting point is those packed in the regular release. Secondly include within flightgear/fgdata a database of other aircraft. This database should be searchable by keyword(s). Fgrun and similar programs will also need access to this database. Maintain the various aircraft in smaller repositories, no more than (say) 50 in each. The allocation to each repo is unimportant as selection is done by the keywords. It may be more convenient to have one aircraft per repo, to avoid difficulties in extracting just one - this depends if SVN, CVS , GIT, HTML, or some combination is used. Add new aircraft repos as the number of aircraft increases. Keywords could be the obvious (military, civil, helicopter, training, transport, vintage, spaceship etc) but could also include fdm, status, author and rating. This system is also adaptable to referring to non GPL private hangars. Alan -- LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 80, Issue 8
On Sat, 22 Dec 2012, Clement de l'Hamaide wrote: I have had no contact with them either by phone or otherwise. I don't know whether or not either party has a legitimate gripe. What I DO know is that it doesn't have a damn thing to do with the purpose of this mailing list. I would strongly request you take your drama to the forums. It has no place here. g. -- Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007 http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind. http://www.diy-cockpits.org/coll - Go Collimated or Go Home. Some people collect things for a hobby. Geeks collect hobbies. ScarletDME - The red hot Data Management Environment A Multi-Value database for the masses, not the classes. http://www.scarletdme.org - Get it _today_! -- LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 80, Issue 8
I would strongly request you take your drama to the forums. It has no place here. Better take the drame to your own forum... This all just leads away from the issue raised by Emilian: the DR400 document that Emanuel uploaded contains a copyright notice that is not compatible with the GPL. The author of the document agreed to release it under the GPL (as can be read at the forum), but the current copyright notice in the document says otherwise. So, either the document should be removed from Git, or its copyright notice should be modified so it corresponds to the GPL. Gijs -- LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 80, Issue 8
On Sat, 22 Dec 2012, Gijs de Rooy wrote: I would strongly request you take your drama to the forums. It has no place here. Better take the drame to your own forum... That makes no sense at all. I'll write it off to a collision between your writing and my understanding. :) This all just leads away from the issue raised by Emilian: the DR400 document that Emanuel uploaded contains a copyright notice that is not compatible with the GPL. The author of the document agreed to release it under the GPL (as can be read at the forum), but the current copyright notice in the document says otherwise. Regardless, this crap doesn't belong on the developer list. This is flightgear-devel, not flightgear-people-whine-about-file-header-changes. g. -- Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007 http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind. http://www.diy-cockpits.org/coll - Go Collimated or Go Home. Some people collect things for a hobby. Geeks collect hobbies. ScarletDME - The red hot Data Management Environment A Multi-Value database for the masses, not the classes. http://www.scarletdme.org - Get it _today_! -- LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 80, Issue 8
Better take the drame to your own forum... That makes no sense at all. I'll write it off to a collision between your writing and my understanding. :) With your forum I meant Emmanuel's forum. Didn't mean Gene's forum :-) Sorry for being unclear. -- LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 80, Issue 8
On Sat, 22 Dec 2012, Gijs de Rooy wrote: Better take the drame to your own forum... That makes no sense at all. I'll write it off to a collision between your writing and my understanding. :) With your forum I meant Emmanuel's forum. Didn't mean Gene's forum :-) Sorry for being unclear. No problem. Nothing like two people, separated by a common language. :) g. -- Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007 http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind. http://www.diy-cockpits.org/coll - Go Collimated or Go Home. Some people collect things for a hobby. Geeks collect hobbies. ScarletDME - The red hot Data Management Environment A Multi-Value database for the masses, not the classes. http://www.scarletdme.org - Get it _today_! -- LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 80, Issue 8
You mean you speak Dutch? :) Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 11:47:19 -0800 From: ge...@deltasoft.com To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 80, Issue 8 On Sat, 22 Dec 2012, Gijs de Rooy wrote: Better take the drame to your own forum... That makes no sense at all. I'll write it off to a collision between your writing and my understanding. :) With your forum I meant Emmanuel's forum. Didn't mean Gene's forum :-) Sorry for being unclear. No problem. Nothing like two people, separated by a common language. :) g. -- Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007 http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind. http://www.diy-cockpits.org/coll - Go Collimated or Go Home. Some people collect things for a hobby. Geeks collect hobbies. ScarletDME - The red hot Data Management Environment A Multi-Value database for the masses, not the classes. http://www.scarletdme.org - Get it _today_! -- LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel -- LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
[Flightgear-devel] Questions to MP Protocol
Dear List, I am looking for someone with whom I can discuss some detail questions about FGs MP protocol. I have written an application that communicates with running FG instances. I can receive all messages, but sometimes my messages seem to be lost. My understanding is this: Chat messages are sent inside the position update packages. At first I have sent them only once, but now I send them at least 10 times for at least 3 seconds. This code is there to prevent UDP drops. But it did not help. Is there a hidden bug in my sending logic or do I something completely wrong? Wolfram signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 80, Issue 8
Double, most of the time J Vivian From: TDO Brandano [mailto:tdo_brand...@hotmail.com] Sent: 22 December 2012 20:51 To: Flightgear Devel List Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 80, Issue 8 You mean you speak Dutch? :) Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 11:47:19 -0800 From: ge...@deltasoft.com To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 80, Issue 8 On Sat, 22 Dec 2012, Gijs de Rooy wrote: Better take the drame to your own forum... That makes no sense at all. I'll write it off to a collision between your writing and my understanding. :) With your forum I meant Emmanuel's forum. Didn't mean Gene's forum :-) Sorry for being unclear. No problem. Nothing like two people, separated by a common language. :) g. -- Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007 http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind. http://www.diy-cockpits.org/coll - Go Collimated or Go Home. Some people collect things for a hobby. Geeks collect hobbies. ScarletDME - The red hot Data Management Environment A Multi-Value database for the masses, not the classes. http://www.scarletdme.org - Get it _today_! -- LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel -- LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
