[fluent-nhib] Re: Signing our assemblies
That's a good call. On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Luis Abreu wrote: > +1 for signing and adding the allow partial calllers attribute so that > non-signed dlls can still call use the assembly. > > > > > > > > *From:* fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com [mailto: > fluent-nhibern...@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Andrew Stewart > *Sent:* terça-feira, 13 de Janeiro de 2009 20:09 > *To:* fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* [fluent-nhib] Re: Signing our assemblies > > > > I think signing is a good idea, it just makes playing with other code > easier, imho. > > > > Andy > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:58 PM, James Gregory > wrote: > > Nobody seemed to have any opinions on it, so it's been left alone > currently. The key is still distributed with the project, so you're welcome > to sign it yourself until we make a decision. > > > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Ralph Balck wrote: > > > I dont know if you guys have gone ahead with this or not, but im all > for signing. > > > On Dec 21 2008, 4:51 pm, "James Gregory" > wrote: > > > Guys, > > I'm just combing through the Issues list and one that stood out as a very > easy > > fix concerns signing the assemblies. We already have a snk, however I > > thought I'd ask what everyone thought about it. Should we be signing our > > assemblies? > > > > I'm not really aware of the implications of signing, I realise you need > it > > for the GAC, and you can't use unsigned assemblies from within a signed > one. > > They all sound like good reasons to sign ours; however, are there any > > reasons we shouldn't be signing? > > > > James > > > > > > > > > -- > = > I-nnovate Software - Bespoke Software Development, uk wirral. > http://www.i-nnovate.net > > > > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Fluent NHibernate" group. To post to this group, send email to fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to fluent-nhibernate+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[fluent-nhib] Re: Signing our assemblies
+1 for signing and adding the allow partial calllers attribute so that non-signed dlls can still call use the assembly. From: fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com [mailto:fluent-nhibern...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Stewart Sent: terça-feira, 13 de Janeiro de 2009 20:09 To: fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com Subject: [fluent-nhib] Re: Signing our assemblies I think signing is a good idea, it just makes playing with other code easier, imho. Andy On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:58 PM, James Gregory wrote: Nobody seemed to have any opinions on it, so it's been left alone currently. The key is still distributed with the project, so you're welcome to sign it yourself until we make a decision. On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Ralph Balck wrote: I dont know if you guys have gone ahead with this or not, but im all for signing. On Dec 21 2008, 4:51 pm, "James Gregory" wrote: > Guys, > I'm just combing through the Issues list and one that stood out as a very easy > fix concerns signing the assemblies. We already have a snk, however I > thought I'd ask what everyone thought about it. Should we be signing our > assemblies? > > I'm not really aware of the implications of signing, I realise you need it > for the GAC, and you can't use unsigned assemblies from within a signed one. > They all sound like good reasons to sign ours; however, are there any > reasons we shouldn't be signing? > > James -- = I-nnovate Software - Bespoke Software Development, uk wirral. http://www.i-nnovate.net --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Fluent NHibernate" group. To post to this group, send email to fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to fluent-nhibernate+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[fluent-nhib] Re: Signing our assemblies
I think signing is a good idea, it just makes playing with other code easier, imho. Andy On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:58 PM, James Gregory wrote: > Nobody seemed to have any opinions on it, so it's been left alone > currently. The key is still distributed with the project, so you're welcome > to sign it yourself until we make a decision. > > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Ralph Balck wrote: > >> >> I dont know if you guys have gone ahead with this or not, but im all >> for signing. >> >> >> On Dec 21 2008, 4:51 pm, "James Gregory" >> wrote: >> > Guys, >> > I'm just combing through the Issues list and one that stood out as a >> very easy >> > fix concerns signing the assemblies. We already have a snk, however I >> > thought I'd ask what everyone thought about it. Should we be signing our >> > assemblies? >> > >> > I'm not really aware of the implications of signing, I realise you need >> it >> > for the GAC, and you can't use unsigned assemblies from within a signed >> one. >> > They all sound like good reasons to sign ours; however, are there any >> > reasons we shouldn't be signing? >> > >> > James >> >> > > > > -- = I-nnovate Software - Bespoke Software Development, uk wirral. http://www.i-nnovate.net --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Fluent NHibernate" group. To post to this group, send email to fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to fluent-nhibernate+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[fluent-nhib] Re: Signing our assemblies
Nobody seemed to have any opinions on it, so it's been left alone currently. The key is still distributed with the project, so you're welcome to sign it yourself until we make a decision. On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Ralph Balck wrote: > > I dont know if you guys have gone ahead with this or not, but im all > for signing. > > > On Dec 21 2008, 4:51 pm, "James Gregory" > wrote: > > Guys, > > I'm just combing through the Issues list and one that stood out as a very > easy > > fix concerns signing the assemblies. We already have a snk, however I > > thought I'd ask what everyone thought about it. Should we be signing our > > assemblies? > > > > I'm not really aware of the implications of signing, I realise you need > it > > for the GAC, and you can't use unsigned assemblies from within a signed > one. > > They all sound like good reasons to sign ours; however, are there any > > reasons we shouldn't be signing? > > > > James > > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Fluent NHibernate" group. To post to this group, send email to fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to fluent-nhibernate+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[fluent-nhib] Re: Signing our assemblies
I dont know if you guys have gone ahead with this or not, but im all for signing. On Dec 21 2008, 4:51 pm, "James Gregory" wrote: > Guys, > I'm just combing through the Issues list and one that stood out as a very easy > fix concerns signing the assemblies. We already have a snk, however I > thought I'd ask what everyone thought about it. Should we be signing our > assemblies? > > I'm not really aware of the implications of signing, I realise you need it > for the GAC, and you can't use unsigned assemblies from within a signed one. > They all sound like good reasons to sign ours; however, are there any > reasons we shouldn't be signing? > > James --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Fluent NHibernate" group. To post to this group, send email to fluent-nhibernate@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to fluent-nhibernate+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---