Re: FLUXLIST: FLUXLIST BOX #2?
I second and third Josh's and Melissa's ideas about a second box for/of the fluxlist. I am also happy to help out in any way needed along with contributing. It seems to me that there are two aspects that would be nice to work into this project: 1. a collection of scores since there have been several nice ones posted to the list, so this could be a compilation of those already posted as well as new ones; 2. More along the lines of Melissa's idea of a box of multiples or the like (that is what you were thinking wasn't it Melissa?) I have more ideas, but let's see what others think. . . . Owen
FLUXLIST: H.N.Y
Thinking about the day, the year ahead, the year behind -- it's been pretty durn good! Happy New Year to all you FluxlistFolk, and here's to some projects and scripts and ideas and good art! Melissa McCarthy Hours: whimsical or by appointment >>>Adult, maybe; grown-up, never!<<< [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
Re: FLUXLIST: FLUXLIST BOX #2?
I second the thought of a Second Fluxlist Box the first one was great, and I'm getting into doing multiples. So I'd participate, but can't offer to do more. Anyone else? Melissa McCarthy Hours: whimsical or by appointment >>>Adult, maybe; grown-up, never!<<< [EMAIL PROTECTED] The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*.
FLUXLIST: FLUXLIST BOX #2?
Friends, Is it not time to start thinking of a second FluxList Box? I treasure the first one and I love showing it to visitors. While recently thinking of the Fluxus for Dummies book that will never get finished, I thought that a FluxList box is a project I could tend to completion. Who is in it with me? Should we have the same parameters as last time? I have not began to look for boxes. I would prefer that the theme of the box be kept free (i.e. open to any interpretation), but I would like to suggest two titles: a) Box #2: FluxList for Dummies b) FluxList Box for Peace However, everything is open for debate. -Josh Ronsen in Austin, Texas Need a new email address that people can remember Check out the new EudoraMail at http://www.eudoramail.com
FLUXLIST: spirit of fluxus
www.slonet.org/~tsulaiti/fluxus.html Please note: fluxus definition Handwritten note by GM. Squeak, squeak. http://www.xcu.com/webdesign_3/projekt2/mlaur/Maciunas/George_Maciunas1.jpg Do learn to type SHIT. -- http://fastmail.fm - Access all of your messages and folders wherever you are
Re: FLUXLIST: make that THREE and FOUR
On Wed, 01 Jan 2003 18:14:10 -0700, "Carol Starr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > thank you allen for having the courage to through the bull out of > the > barn. The only bullSHIT in the barn is you. Nor is allen "courageous". If he were, he'd not be censoring the list. And certainly not (us) but others who have been involved in FLUXUS rather before him, if we are not mistaken. Shu, but we cannot imagine it is comfortable for those who attempt to make careers out of currently fashionable corpse of FLUXUS. Lest it's forgotten, the major figuras of FLUXUS were involved in it in the 60s, 70s. Typical academic "feeding" after founder's death, as well as attempts to rewrite history, after all of the originals start dying out. It would be so comfortable if all figuras pre-1980s when FLUXUS happened are removed n'est pas? This is not courage. This is cheap egotistical + standard academic shark politics. FAR REMOVED from ART. > now lets all have a very creative and happy 2003. You are not capable of creativity, dear. Self-important drivel? Yes. None of the stuff on this list touches GM, Nam Jun Paik, Flynt, Cage, Beuys, La Monte Young, Karpow (sp?)--truly + genuinely intelligent, good + exceptional individuals. It's a shame to see academicism destroy yet another "corpse" after the acting figures are dead. > xxx Hyenas. PS. We are not speaking for nor involved with Eric Andersen. The above is recived + transmitted via other manner. > allen bukoff wrote: > > > Open the windows, let some stale air out, let some fresh air in. > > > > I swear I don't know what has gotten into me...abusing power like this. > > > > Maybe 2003 is a time to renew Fluxlist. > > > > Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 16:04:12 -0800 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Majordomo results: remove eric anderson & st auby tamas > > > > xx remove FLUXLIST [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Succeeded. > > > > xx remove FLUXLIST [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Succeeded. > > > -- http://fastmail.fm - Access your email from home and the web
Re: FLUXLIST: make that THREE and FOUR
thank you allen for having the courage to through the bull out of the barn. now lets all have a very creative and happy 2003. cheers, carol :) xxx allen bukoff wrote: > Open the windows, let some stale air out, let some fresh air in. > > I swear I don't know what has gotten into me...abusing power like this. > > Maybe 2003 is a time to renew Fluxlist. > > Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 16:04:12 -0800 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Majordomo results: remove eric anderson & st auby tamas > > xx remove FLUXLIST [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Succeeded. > > xx remove FLUXLIST [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Succeeded. >
[no subject]
O. Excuse us--but we must have been mistaken. This is not a FLUXUS list. It is a pacifier for a few ignorant maniacs who cannot control themselves. New air? Yes, we are always for "new air". But new air means overcoming old, murderous ape impulses and programmatic knee-jerks. And that requires real (art)work. Not passive-aggressive dictatorial idiocy. -- http://fastmail.fm - Send your email first class
[no subject]
From: allen bukoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: welcome welcome to fluxlist what is your purpose in joining? .Our intent is obvious to those who can see. what do you hope to get out of fluxlist subscription? .Hope does not function in order to "get things out of." allen bukoff one of severall fluxlist list administrators/owners .owner = dictatorial ape is this FLUXLIST or a list to act as pacifiers for the egos of a few marginal figures? Tell us allen, dear, how does it work? Several idiots project their own negativity + egos onto us, and we must either swallow crap and play along with their egos, or are censored? FLUXLIST is a simpleton gathering, or an art list? It does not matter how many times you "unsubscribe" us. You're attempting scapegoat murder in order to pacify the murderous impulses of a few simpletons. We are quite sure that this is not "mutual support" but idiocy. -- http://fastmail.fm - And now for something completely different...
FLUXLIST: make that THREE and FOUR
Open the windows, let some stale air out, let some fresh air in. I swear I don't know what has gotten into me...abusing power like this. Maybe 2003 is a time to renew Fluxlist. Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 16:04:12 -0800 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Majordomo results: remove eric anderson & st auby tamas xx remove FLUXLIST [EMAIL PROTECTED] Succeeded. xx remove FLUXLIST [EMAIL PROTECTED] Succeeded.
Re: FLUXLIST: make that TWO (twice)
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 15:23:32 -0800 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Majordomo results: remove [EMAIL PROTECTED] xx remove FLUXLIST [EMAIL PROTECTED] Succeeded.
FLUXLIST: Disgrace
It ia time this buckoff gives up his ownership platitudes and steps down as listowner. He is genuine antiflux. > >From: allen bukoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: FLUXLIST: (II) a few thoughts (addendum) > >Mime-Version: 1.0 > >X-Loop-Detect: 1 > >Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Precedence: bulk > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >X-URL: http://www.fluxus.org/FLUXLIST > > > > >HAS ANYONE EVER BEEN KICKED OFF/BANNED FROM FLUXLIST? Yes. One person. > > > >Make that two.
FLUXLIST: make that ONE
ciao, is this a list about FLUXUS or aboout "pacifying" crybabies carol.meryl.etc. and justified "censorship" + herd mentality? `, . ` `k a r e i'? ' D42
Re: FLUXLIST: Re: painful art
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Bertrand Clavez wrote: > > > Escaping work : that's a nice "reason" to make "art" isn't it? > > Well then. How about everybody start making art only. > I've heard about something called Fluxus which is said to have been trying > to consider working "normally" as an artform (but what can "working > normally" be meaning?...) Certainly. And the "idea" is not new. Without disrespect for Fluxus, it has been implemented, spoken about, etc. by many others before. But we respect FLUXUS for maintaining the notion (or attempting to) (which is not evidenced by this list).
Re: FLUXLIST: Re: painful art
> Escaping work : that's a nice "reason" to make "art" isn't it? > Well then. How about everybody start making art only. I've heard about something called Fluxus which is said to have been trying to consider working "normally" as an artform (but what can "working normally" be meaning?...)
Re: FLUXLIST: greetings
I want to wish every one of you a very Happy New Year. Peace and blessings on you all. carol xxx
FLUXLIST: (II) a few thoughts (addendum)
>HAS ANYONE EVER BEEN KICKED OFF/BANNED FROM FLUXLIST? Yes. One person. Make that two. Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 08:57:55 -0800 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Majordomo results: remove [EMAIL PROTECTED] xx removed FLUXLIST "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Succeeded. Happy New Year.
Re: FLUXLIST: all FLUXLIST-digests
/"\ \ / X ASCII ribbon campaign* all HTML messages go straight to / \ against HTML mail /dev/null
Re: FLUXLIST: (I) a few thoughts about moderation, ownership & the originsof FLUXLIST
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, John Blower wrote: > >One always concurs with justified violence : the trait of the herd. > >kk > > > [Yawn...] Boredom is a self-inflicted knee-jerk. What was written was precise + accurate. No amount of "yawning" or other passive-aggressive knee-jerking would alter its value-idity. Tak. Nor would ita lter that you're avoiding responsibility for your own behavior. The very "first" to scream about "offenders". Add yourself to the list.
Re: FLUXLIST: (I) a few thoughts about moderation, ownership & the originsof FLUXLIST
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, meryl wrote: > Wasn't there a prize presenter on the old "Let's Make a Deal" game show > called Carol Meryl? Or maybe it was Carol Maryl, but is was certainly > something like that. > > Coincidence or what? No, babycheeks. Avoid attempting to "sidestep" + "slight" what was writtena bout you with "clever" jokes. The above is simply meaningless evasiveness. Abrogation of responsibility for one's own behavior.
Re: FLUXLIST: (I) a few thoughts about moderation, ownership & the originsof FLUXLIST
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, meryl wrote: > Ahh, yer mother wears army boots. No babycheeks. We are not the wishful projections inside your brain. Ultra-idiotic "clever" but meaningless posturing. What was written about you was precis + accurate. And we would "suggest" that you don't insult your own mother, because that is exactly what you're doing.
Re: FLUXLIST: GOOD WORK
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Crispin Webb wrote: > NEGATIVITY may be the only thing that will get our > attention. BITE someone and they are sure to react. Too bad the above is a meaningless "cliche". However the "languij" obsessed-ape fancies any nonsense that floats out of its mouth and spreads around 'wise". Introduction of "right" "languij+diets" might destroy entire populations safer than Auschwitz, naturralich.
FLUXLIST: Happy New Year
A Happy and Peaceful 2003 to you all XXX Roger
