Re: Long licence

[Jeremias Maerki]

I know. Everyone here at Apache feels the same but AFAIK this is not
possible. In today's world lawyers still seem to be more important than
software developers. :-) It would be so cool, if IDEs would have the
ability to hide a licence at the beginning of a file.

Anyway, I can't give you a definitive answer. I'd ask on community@.

Thanks for your help changing the licences.

On 21.02.2003 06:07:32 Peter B. West wrote:
> Can we put the copyright notice at the end of the files?  It's a PITA 
> haaving it at the beginning.  I'll change the FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design files.



Jeremias Maerki


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Problem with fop

[Isabel Fuentes]

Dear sir/madam of xml.apache.org,
 
 I'm writing to you in order to know if you could help me 
with the following problem:
 
 I'm working with fop-0,20.1 version to create a pdf 
document using xml and xslt, but when I install the application into a computer 
with Windows XP, the following message error appears:
 
  "Error creating process, Denied access."
 
 With Windows NT or Windows 2000, the operation runs without any 
problem and the pdf document is created successfully.
 
 I'd really appreciate any help.
 
 Yours faithfully,
 
Isabel

Re: Problem with fop

[Jochen . Maes]

hi Isabelle,


I'm not from Apache but i work on XP with FOP.
Are you running Xp Home or XP Pro
Are you running the process as a normal user, or as a superuser (i think
the XP word is computer administrator)?

i had the problem when i used the application as a normal user, but as
computer administor i can work with FOP without any troubles...

If you're a normal user you might wan't to check if you can use the JVM

i hope this gives you more options and helps you out.

Don't hesitate to  ask more questions...


greetings

Jochen Maes
ICT Development


KBC Securities (kbcsecurities.com)
Havenlaan 12 Avenue du Port SIF 8683
B-1080 Brussels
Belgium

 Tel:  +32 2 429 96 81  

 GSM:  +32 496 57 90 99 

 E-mail :  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 





This message and any attachments hereto are for the named person's use
only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged
information. You may not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose,
distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the
intended recipient. If you have received this e-mail message without being
the intended recipient, please notify KBC Securities promptly and delete
this e-mail. Any views expressed in this message are those of the
individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender
is authorised to state them to be the views of KBC Securities. KBC
Securities reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through
its networks and any messages addressed to, received or sent by KBC
Securities or its employees are deemed to be professional in nature. The
sender or recipient of any messages to or of KBC Securities agrees that
those may be read by other employees of KBC Securities than the stated
recipient or sender in order to ensure the continuity of work-related
activities and allow supervision thereof. KBC Securities does not accept
liability for the correct and complete transmission of the information, nor
for any delay or interruption of the transmission, nor for damages arising
from the use of, or reliance on, the information.


   

"Isabel

Fuentes" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   Subject: Problem with fop 

   

21/02/2003 

09:43  

Please 

respond to 

fop-dev

   

   





Dear sir/madam of xml.apache.org,

 I'm writing to you in order to know if you could help me with the
following problem:

 I'm working with fop-0,20.1 version to create a pdf document using xml and
xslt, but when I install the application into a computer with Windows XP,
the following message error appears:


  "Error creating process, Denied access."


 With Windows NT or Windows 2000, the operation runs without any problem
and the pdf document is created successfully.

 I'd really appreciate any help.

 Yours faithfully,

Isabel




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Problem with fop

[Jeremias Maerki]

I'm working with FOP on Windows XP and have absolutely no problems. I
suggest you contact your Domain administrator to sort out security
restrictions on your machine. This problem, anyway, has nothing to do
with FOP directly.

By the way, you should consider upgrading your FOP version. (not that
this would solve your immediate problem)

On 21.02.2003 09:43:47 Isabel Fuentes wrote:
>  I'm writing to you in order to know if you could help me with the following problem:
> 
>  I'm working with fop-0,20.1 version to create a pdf document using xml and xslt, 
>but when I install the application into a computer with Windows XP, the following 
>message error appears:
> 
> 
>   "Error creating process, Denied access."
> 
> 
>  With Windows NT or Windows 2000, the operation runs without any problem and the pdf 
>document is created successfully.


Jeremias Maerki


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Problem with fop

[Isabel Fuentes]

Hi,

I'm running the process as administrator, the XP Pro.

What version FOP are you running? I`ve upgrading the FOP version to
fop-20.3, the following message error appears:
"[ERROR]  'master-reference' for 'fo:page-sequence' matches no
'simple-page-master' or 'page-sequence-master' ".
I've changed 'masters-name' by 'masters-reference'.

Thanks


- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 9:45 AM
Subject: Re: Problem with fop


>
> hi Isabelle,
>
>
> I'm not from Apache but i work on XP with FOP.
> Are you running Xp Home or XP Pro
> Are you running the process as a normal user, or as a superuser (i think
> the XP word is computer administrator)?
>
> i had the problem when i used the application as a normal user, but as
> computer administor i can work with FOP without any troubles...
>
> If you're a normal user you might wan't to check if you can use the JVM
>
> i hope this gives you more options and helps you out.
>
> Don't hesitate to  ask more questions...
>
>
> greetings
>
> Jochen Maes
> ICT Development
>
>
> KBC Securities (kbcsecurities.com)
> Havenlaan 12 Avenue du Port SIF 8683
> B-1080 Brussels
> Belgium
>
>  Tel:  +32 2 429 96 81
>
>  GSM:  +32 496 57 90 99
>
>  E-mail :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
> This message and any attachments hereto are for the named person's use
> only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged
> information. You may not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose,
> distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the
> intended recipient. If you have received this e-mail message without being
> the intended recipient, please notify KBC Securities promptly and delete
> this e-mail. Any views expressed in this message are those of the
> individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the
sender
> is authorised to state them to be the views of KBC Securities. KBC
> Securities reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through
> its networks and any messages addressed to, received or sent by KBC
> Securities or its employees are deemed to be professional in nature. The
> sender or recipient of any messages to or of KBC Securities agrees that
> those may be read by other employees of KBC Securities than the stated
> recipient or sender in order to ensure the continuity of work-related
> activities and allow supervision thereof. KBC Securities does not accept
> liability for the correct and complete transmission of the information,
nor
> for any delay or interruption of the transmission, nor for damages arising
> from the use of, or reliance on, the information.
>
>
>
> "Isabel
> Fuentes" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  vasoft.es>   Subject: Problem with fop
>
> 21/02/2003
> 09:43
> Please

> respond to
> fop-dev
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear sir/madam of xml.apache.org,
>
>  I'm writing to you in order to know if you could help me with the
> following problem:
>
>  I'm working with fop-0,20.1 version to create a pdf document using xml
and
> xslt, but when I install the application into a computer with Windows XP,
> the following message error appears:
>
>
>   "Error creating process, Denied access."
>
>
>  With Windows NT or Windows 2000, the operation runs without any problem
> and the pdf document is created successfully.
>
>  I'd really appreciate any help.
>
>  Yours faithfully,
>
> Isabel
>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Problem with fop

[Jeremias Maerki]

0.20.3 is still a pretty old version. Download 0.20.4 or 0.20.5rc2. And
please read the release notes under http://xml.apache.org/fop/relnotes.html.

On 21.02.2003 11:52:17 Isabel Fuentes wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm running the process as administrator, the XP Pro.
> 
> What version FOP are you running? I`ve upgrading the FOP version to
> fop-20.3, the following message error appears:
> "[ERROR]  'master-reference' for 'fo:page-sequence' matches no
> 'simple-page-master' or 'page-sequence-master' ".
> I've changed 'masters-name' by 'masters-reference'.


Jeremias Maerki


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17277] New: - Multiple fo:page-sequence generates blank page between

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17277

Multiple fo:page-sequence generates blank page between

   Summary: Multiple fo:page-sequence generates blank page between
   Product: Fop
   Version: 0.20.5
  Platform: Other
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
  Severity: Normal
  Priority: Other
 Component: page-master/layout
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Just try tthe FO attached afterwards. It should produce 3 pages but is producing
5. Tested on 0.20.5rc2. Also here is the debug (look at the "[INFO] [2 (blank)]"
message.

The debug:
C:\develop\fop-0.20.5rc>fop -d gcomalbh.fo -pcl gcomalbh.pcl
[DEBUG] Input mode:
[DEBUG] FO
[DEBUG] fo input file: gcomalbh.fo
[DEBUG] Output mode:
[DEBUG] pcl
[DEBUG] output file: gcomalbh.pcl
[DEBUG] OPTIONS
[DEBUG] no user configuration file is used [default]
[DEBUG] debug mode on
[DEBUG] dump configuration
[DEBUG] quiet mode on
[INFO] Using org.apache.xerces.parsers.SAXParser as SAX2 Parser
[INFO] base directory: file:/C:/develop/fop-0.20.5rc/
[INFO] FOP 0.20.5rc
[INFO] Using org.apache.xerces.parsers.SAXParser as SAX2 Parser
[INFO] building formatting object tree
[INFO] setting up fonts
[INFO] rendering areas to PCL
[INFO] [1]
[WARNING] Horizontal position out of bounds.
[DEBUG] Last page-sequence produced 1 pages.
[INFO] [2 (blank)]
[INFO] [1]
[WARNING] Horizontal position out of bounds.
[DEBUG] Last page-sequence produced 1 pages.
[INFO] [2 (blank)]
[INFO] [1]
[WARNING] Horizontal position out of bounds.
[DEBUG] Last page-sequence produced 1 pages.
[INFO] Parsing of document complete, stopping renderer
[INFO] writing out PCL
[DEBUG] Initial heap size: 880Kb
[DEBUG] Current heap size: 945Kb
[DEBUG] Total memory used: 65Kb
[DEBUG]   Memory use is indicative; no GC was performed
[DEBUG]   These figures should not be used comparatively
[DEBUG] Total time used: 450ms
[DEBUG] Pages rendered: 5
[DEBUG] Avg render time: 90ms/page


The FO:



http://xml.apache.org/xalan";
xmlns:fo="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format";>

















Page  Sequence 1


BODY Sequence 1





Page  Sequence 2


BODY Sequence 2





Page  Sequence 3


BODY  Sequence 3




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17277] - Multiple fo:page-sequence generates blank page between

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17277

Multiple fo:page-sequence generates blank page between

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-02-21 12:20 ---
This is not a bug. Be aware that the default for force-page-count on fo:page-
sequence is "auto" which is responsible for this result. Please consult the 
specification. If you don't want that behaviour, I suggest you set force-page-
count to "no-force".

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Licence issues in hyphenation patterns

[Dirk-Willem van Gulik]

On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, J.Pietschmann wrote:

> > I am donating the hyphenation file to the ASF, and although it would be
> > nice to keep the copyright, I think that would hamper future enhancements,
> > or not?

> As long as you don't choose to revoke the license for all
> future and past versions (rather than forking or whatever),
> there wouldn't be a problem. This was recently extensively

If you guys want to play it safe; which I strongly suggest you do - then
work with the pmc to do document this in a simple 'grant'.

I've attached a copy.

You simply fill this out out and simply fax/snail it to the ASF. The
correct address is at: http://www.apache.org/foundation/contact.html

As the description in exhibit A you put something like:

'name of the file(s) (plain, tar or zip)'
'description of what is in them'
md5 checksum

or if you feel very heroic you could put them on CD and mail that by snail
mail. But md5's are fine too. You can also reference a message on a
mailing list:

Exhibit A

The code as contained in the message of Friday, 21 February 2003,
00:12:05 +0100, with message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> as
send by Peter Poo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to the mailing list
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with an md5=12890341289037123489

Note that committers doing their own code imports do not have to do
'grant's - as their code is already covered by a blanket statement they've
made when they became a committer. This is when we accept stuff from a
third party.

Dw

License Agreement


This License Agreement is entered into as of the ___ day of
, __ by ___ ("Licensor"),
in favor of The Apache Software Foundation, a Delaware nonstock
membership corporation (the "Foundation").

WHEREAS, Licensor owns or has sufficient rights to contribute the
software source code and other related intellectual property as
itemized on Exhibit A ("Software") under the terms of this agreement
to the Foundation for use within Foundation software development
projects ("Projects").

NOW, THEREFORE, FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt
and legal sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties
hereto, intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:

1. Subject to the terms and conditions of this License, Licensor
hereby grants to the Foundation:

  a) a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free, irrevocable
 copyright license to reproduce, prepare derivative works of,
 publicly display, publicly perform, distribute and sublicense,
 internally and externally, the Software and such derivative
 works, in source code and object code form; and,

  b) a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free, irrevocable
 patent license under Licensed Patents to make, use, sell,
 offer to sell, import and otherwise transfer the Software
 in source code and object code form. "Licensed Patents" mean
 patent claims owned by Licensor which are necessarily
 infringed by the use or sale of the Software alone.

2. Licensor represents that, to Licensor's knowledge, Licensor is
legally entitled to grant the above license. Licensor agrees to notify
the Foundation of any facts or circumstances of which Licensor becomes
aware and which makes or would make Licensor's representations in this
License Agreement inaccurate in any respect.

3. This Software is provided AS-IS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS
OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION,
ANY WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY
OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  NEITHER THE LICENSOR NOR ITS
SUPPLIERS WILL BE LIABLE TO THE FOUNDATION OR ITS LICENSEES FOR ANY
DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
DAMAGES (INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION LOST PROFITS), HOWEVER CAUSED
AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY,
OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF
THE USE OR DISTRIBUTION OF THE WORK OR THE EXERCISE OF ANY RIGHTS
GRANTED HEREUNDER, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.

This License Agreement is the entire agreement of the parties
with respect to its subject matter, and may only be amended by a
writing signed by each party. This License Agreement may be
executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be
considered an original.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Licensor has executed this License Agreement
as of the date first written above.


LICENSOR:


Signed By: _

Print Name: 

Title: _

Representing: __



Exhibit A

List of software and other intellectual property covered by this agreement:





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Long licence

[Dirk-Willem van Gulik]

On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Jeremias Maerki wrote:

> software developers. :-) It would be so cool, if IDEs would have the
> ability to hide a licence at the beginning of a file.

I;ve seen some clever pragma's/markers which let emacs do this.

DW


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Long licence

[Arved Sandstrom]

Dirk, you may have seen my post on members, about this. The whole length of
license issue.

I find it odd that it's OK to suggest tools (IDEs/editors, etc) to hide a
license. When the argument presented to the board was presumably that the
long license is legally required.

I'd like to find out what lawyer thought a long license is needed with every
file. Because I question that finding.

Arved

> -Original Message-
> From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: February 21, 2003 8:43 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Long licence
>
> On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>
> > software developers. :-) It would be so cool, if IDEs would have the
> > ability to hide a licence at the beginning of a file.
>
> I;ve seen some clever pragma's/markers which let emacs do this.
>
> DW


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Problem with fop

[Isabel Fuentes]

Hi,

I've download fop-0.20.5rc2. and I've read the release notes but I've a
problem again.
If I execute fop.bat from command line it works fine, however if I do it
from Internet Explorer 6 SP 1 I get the following error message: "Error
creating process Denied Access"

- Original Message -
From: "Jeremias Maerki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 12:11 PM
Subject: Re: Problem with fop


> 0.20.3 is still a pretty old version. Download 0.20.4 or 0.20.5rc2. And
> please read the release notes under
http://xml.apache.org/fop/relnotes.html.
>
> On 21.02.2003 11:52:17 Isabel Fuentes wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm running the process as administrator, the XP Pro.
> >
> > What version FOP are you running? I`ve upgrading the FOP version to
> > fop-20.3, the following message error appears:
> > "[ERROR]  'master-reference' for 'fo:page-sequence' matches no
> > 'simple-page-master' or 'page-sequence-master' ".
> > I've changed 'masters-name' by 'masters-reference'.
>
>
> Jeremias Maerki
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Long licence

[Jeremias Maerki]

Arved,

I don't see what's bad about it. The licence stays in every file as
necessary, the IDE should just as a service to the developer hide the
licence because it's not relevant to normal development tasks.

On 21.02.2003 14:01:34 Arved Sandstrom wrote:
> I find it odd that it's OK to suggest tools (IDEs/editors, etc) to hide a
> license. When the argument presented to the board was presumably that the
> long license is legally required.


Jeremias Maerki


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Problem with fop

[Jochen . Maes]

what do you mean with doing it from the internet explorer?

You mean from a servlet? or after browsing your local drives in internet
explorer?


Jochen Maes
ICT Development


KBC Securities (kbcsecurities.com)
Havenlaan 12 Avenue du Port SIF 8683
B-1080 Brussels
Belgium

 Tel:  +32 2 429 96 81  

 GSM:  +32 496 57 90 99 

 E-mail :  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 





This message and any attachments hereto are for the named person's use
only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged
information. You may not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose,
distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the
intended recipient. If you have received this e-mail message without being
the intended recipient, please notify KBC Securities promptly and delete
this e-mail. Any views expressed in this message are those of the
individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender
is authorised to state them to be the views of KBC Securities. KBC
Securities reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through
its networks and any messages addressed to, received or sent by KBC
Securities or its employees are deemed to be professional in nature. The
sender or recipient of any messages to or of KBC Securities agrees that
those may be read by other employees of KBC Securities than the stated
recipient or sender in order to ensure the continuity of work-related
activities and allow supervision thereof. KBC Securities does not accept
liability for the correct and complete transmission of the information, nor
for any delay or interruption of the transmission, nor for damages arising
from the use of, or reliance on, the information.


   

"Isabel

Fuentes" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   Subject: Re: Problem with fop 

   

21/02/2003 

14:16  

Please 

respond to 

fop-dev

   

   





Hi,

I've download fop-0.20.5rc2. and I've read the release notes but I've a
problem again.
If I execute fop.bat from command line it works fine, however if I do it
from Internet Explorer 6 SP 1 I get the following error message: "Error
creating process Denied Access"

- Original Message -
From: "Jeremias Maerki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 12:11 PM
Subject: Re: Problem with fop


> 0.20.3 is still a pretty old version. Download 0.20.4 or 0.20.5rc2. And
> please read the release notes under
http://xml.apache.org/fop/relnotes.html.
>
> On 21.02.2003 11:52:17 Isabel Fuentes wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm running the process as administrator, the XP Pro.
> >
> > What version FOP are you running? I`ve upgrading the FOP version to
> > fop-20.3, the following message error appears:
> > "[ERROR]  'master-reference' for 'fo:page-sequence' matches no
> > 'simple-page-master' or 'page-sequence-master' ".
> > I've changed 'masters-name' by 'masters-reference'.
>
>
> Jeremias Maerki
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Problem with fop

[Jeremias Maerki]

Oh, there's some interesting bit of information: How exactly do you call
fop.bat from Internet Explorer? Strikes me as an odd thing to do? What
are you trying to accomplish? Or are you using a servlet and Acrobat
Reader has a problem starting up inside Internet Explorer?


On 21.02.2003 14:16:11 Isabel Fuentes wrote:
> I've download fop-0.20.5rc2. and I've read the release notes but I've a
> problem again.
> If I execute fop.bat from command line it works fine, however if I do it
> from Internet Explorer 6 SP 1 I get the following error message: "Error
> creating process Denied Access"


Jeremias Maerki


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Problem with fop

[Jochen . Maes]

sorry didn't see this one before..

I run fop-20.3 without any problem...

greetings...



Jochen Maes
ICT Development


KBC Securities (kbcsecurities.com)
Havenlaan 12 Avenue du Port SIF 8683
B-1080 Brussels
Belgium

 Tel:  +32 2 429 96 81  

 GSM:  +32 496 57 90 99 

 E-mail :  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 





This message and any attachments hereto are for the named person's use
only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged
information. You may not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose,
distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the
intended recipient. If you have received this e-mail message without being
the intended recipient, please notify KBC Securities promptly and delete
this e-mail. Any views expressed in this message are those of the
individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender
is authorised to state them to be the views of KBC Securities. KBC
Securities reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through
its networks and any messages addressed to, received or sent by KBC
Securities or its employees are deemed to be professional in nature. The
sender or recipient of any messages to or of KBC Securities agrees that
those may be read by other employees of KBC Securities than the stated
recipient or sender in order to ensure the continuity of work-related
activities and allow supervision thereof. KBC Securities does not accept
liability for the correct and complete transmission of the information, nor
for any delay or interruption of the transmission, nor for damages arising
from the use of, or reliance on, the information.


   

"Isabel

Fuentes" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   Subject: Re: Problem with fop 

   

21/02/2003 

11:52  

Please 

respond to 

fop-dev

   

   





Hi,

I'm running the process as administrator, the XP Pro.

What version FOP are you running? I`ve upgrading the FOP version to
fop-20.3, the following message error appears:
"[ERROR]  'master-reference' for 'fo:page-sequence' matches no
'simple-page-master' or 'page-sequence-master' ".
I've changed 'masters-name' by 'masters-reference'.

Thanks


- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 9:45 AM
Subject: Re: Problem with fop


>
> hi Isabelle,
>
>
> I'm not from Apache but i work on XP with FOP.
> Are you running Xp Home or XP Pro
> Are you running the process as a normal user, or as a superuser (i think
> the XP word is computer administrator)?
>
> i had the problem when i used the application as a normal user, but as
> computer administor i can work with FOP without any troubles...
>
> If you're a normal user you might wan't to check if you can use the JVM
>
> i hope this gives you more options and helps you out.
>
> Don't hesitate to  ask more questions...
>
>
> greetings
>
> Jochen Maes
> ICT Development
>
>
> KBC Securities (kbcsecurities.com)
> Havenlaan 12 Avenue du Port SIF 8683
> B-1080 Brussels
> Belgium
>
>  Tel:  +32 2 429 96 81
>
>  GSM:  +32 496 57 90 99
>
>  E-mail :  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
> This message and any attachments hereto are for the named person's use
> only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged
> information. You may not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose,
> distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the
> intended recipient. If you have received this e-mail message without
being
> the intended recipient, please notify KBC Securities prompt

Re: Problem with fop

[Isabel Fuentes]

I've a web application developed in ASP, XML and XSL thecnology and I
execute fop.bat from ASP file.



- Original Message -
From: "Jeremias Maerki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 2:21 PM
Subject: Re: Problem with fop


> Oh, there's some interesting bit of information: How exactly do you call
> fop.bat from Internet Explorer? Strikes me as an odd thing to do? What
> are you trying to accomplish? Or are you using a servlet and Acrobat
> Reader has a problem starting up inside Internet Explorer?
>
>
> On 21.02.2003 14:16:11 Isabel Fuentes wrote:
> > I've download fop-0.20.5rc2. and I've read the release notes but I've a
> > problem again.
> > If I execute fop.bat from command line it works fine, however if I do it
> > from Internet Explorer 6 SP 1 I get the following error message: "Error
> > creating process Denied Access"
>
>
> Jeremias Maerki
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Problem with fop

[Jochen . Maes]

Ok

Isabelle, There is a property in the IIS5.0 manager that lets you geve
access to certain actions (run scripts execute all etc).
Make sure this is set to run all...

Furthermore, i would strongly recommend using a servlet. It isn't difficult
to set up (nice examples) and it will make your life lots easier...

I know sometimes it is simply not possible but if it is, go for that.

I'm most willing to help in case you need java support

greetings

Jochen Maes
ICT Development


KBC Securities (kbcsecurities.com)
Havenlaan 12 Avenue du Port SIF 8683
B-1080 Brussels
Belgium

 Tel:  +32 2 429 96 81  

 GSM:  +32 496 57 90 99 

 E-mail :  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 





This message and any attachments hereto are for the named person's use
only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged
information. You may not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose,
distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the
intended recipient. If you have received this e-mail message without being
the intended recipient, please notify KBC Securities promptly and delete
this e-mail. Any views expressed in this message are those of the
individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender
is authorised to state them to be the views of KBC Securities. KBC
Securities reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through
its networks and any messages addressed to, received or sent by KBC
Securities or its employees are deemed to be professional in nature. The
sender or recipient of any messages to or of KBC Securities agrees that
those may be read by other employees of KBC Securities than the stated
recipient or sender in order to ensure the continuity of work-related
activities and allow supervision thereof. KBC Securities does not accept
liability for the correct and complete transmission of the information, nor
for any delay or interruption of the transmission, nor for damages arising
from the use of, or reliance on, the information.


   

"Isabel

Fuentes" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

   Subject: Re: Problem with fop 

   

21/02/2003 

14:33  

Please 

respond to 

fop-dev

   

   





I've a web application developed in ASP, XML and XSL thecnology and I
execute fop.bat from ASP file.



- Original Message -
From: "Jeremias Maerki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 2:21 PM
Subject: Re: Problem with fop


> Oh, there's some interesting bit of information: How exactly do you call
> fop.bat from Internet Explorer? Strikes me as an odd thing to do? What
> are you trying to accomplish? Or are you using a servlet and Acrobat
> Reader has a problem starting up inside Internet Explorer?
>
>
> On 21.02.2003 14:16:11 Isabel Fuentes wrote:
> > I've download fop-0.20.5rc2. and I've read the release notes but I've a
> > problem again.
> > If I execute fop.bat from command line it works fine, however if I do
it
> > from Internet Explorer 6 SP 1 I get the following error message: "Error
> > creating process Denied Access"
>
>
> Jeremias Maerki
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For

RE: Long licence

[Arved Sandstrom]

Jeremias, a deliberate decision was taken to frown on condensed licenses or
references. That tell me that there is a legal requirement for the license
to be "in your face". So to speak.

In any case, the board was presented (I assume) with a legal opinion to that
effect. Which, although IANAL, I dispute.

If it so happens that I am wrong (it's been known; I was last wrong on
October 14th, 1995), I am sure that someone will so inform me. But I am
checking with some local IP lawyers to see what the deal is.

My point being that legally there is no distinction between developers
working with OSS, and any other users. And in fact the distinction ought not
be made, as many of the same developers _are_ users of the codebase. So it
is OK to hide the licensing? I think not.

I dislike a long boilerplate license. There are two ways to get rid of it -
one is to use technological techniques to ignore it. I don't like that. FOP
for example has many hundreds of source files...tack in a screen of legal
stuff with each one and note that people with dialup just got presented with
some extra download time. Significant extra download time.

I intend to clarify this issue on the ASF members list. I have problems with
this decision.

Arved

> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: February 21, 2003 9:19 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Long licence
>
>
> Arved,
>
> I don't see what's bad about it. The licence stays in every file as
> necessary, the IDE should just as a service to the developer hide the
> licence because it's not relevant to normal development tasks.
>
> On 21.02.2003 14:01:34 Arved Sandstrom wrote:
> > I find it odd that it's OK to suggest tools (IDEs/editors, etc)
> to hide a
> > license. When the argument presented to the board was
> presumably that the
> > long license is legally required.
>
>
> Jeremias Maerki
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3898] - fails if id is in block with break-before="page"

[bugzilla]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3898

 fails if id is in block with break-before="page"





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-02-21 16:50 ---
I'm not getting the LAST citation in a node set when break-before="page".   
If I remove this attribute, I get all citations.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Long licence

[Dirk-Willem van Gulik]

On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Arved Sandstrom wrote:

> I'd like to find out what lawyer thought a long license is needed with every
> file. Because I question that finding.

Question the board@ (again) for a black/white answer - or work with
licensing@ for a more interactive reply.

But Bear in mind that the current 'license' is more than just strictly a
license; it contains elements of copyright, waiver and an agreement.

Bear in mind that the answer to vague questions like that carry very
significant price tags; and are very depended on the exact question; which
itself by its very nature is inexact.

Also bear in mind that there are very, very few layers who actually have
studied open-source licenses in sufficient dept; and that most answers
from case-law are about proprietary and protectionist stances; and often
very US specific; and may be very dated.

Also bear in mind that the answer differs from jurisdiction to
jurisdiction; and from how litagationous/defensive the side you want to
err on is.

Finally bear in mind that the board propably does not want to ask
expensive questions now with respect to the current license; as the new
license is not far off - and the new license has taken into account this
desire to include by reference.

Dw.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Licence issues in hyphenation patterns

[J.Pietschmann]

Jeremias Maerki wrote:

The important part for us is that the LPPL is not viral, with
the exception of the filename prohibition. In particular it
allows distributing derived work (read: binary FOP distributions)
without the code.


Yes, but see point 4, for example. That will be difficult for the
compiled hyphenation patterns.


We can place a LICENSE file mentioning the exceptions and providing
the required pointers (if necessary) into the binary distribution.
The point was that the LPPL does not infect the whole distribution
summarily.

J.Pietschmann


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

XMLReader...

[Swapan Golla]

I am trying to convert an svg document into pdf using
. It doesn't seem to work
properly on weblogic server. It gives the following
error:

[ERROR] Could not load external SVG: SAX2 driver class
weblogic.xml.jaxp.RegistryXMLReader loaded but cannot
be instantiated
 (no empty public constructor?)
[ERROR] Error while creating area : No ImageReader for
this type of image 
(http:///xxx//image.svg)

Is there a way I can instruct the SVG transcoder API
to use a specific xmlreader than the one used by
weblogic ? 


Thanks in advance,
Swapan.

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Licence issues in hyphenation patterns

[Peter B. West]

Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 20.02.2003 23:58:48 J.Pietschmann wrote:


BTW we should track down and delete all binary distribution
containing the compiled hyph file from the three GPL sources.
The source distributions are not an immediate risk and can be
kept. Who has access to the distro repository?


Good thought!
As long as we are still able to recover complete historical binary 
distributions.  If a problem arises over a past distribution, we are far 
better off if we can refer to the actual distribution, even if that is 
no longer available for general distribution.

--
Peter B. West  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/
"Lord, to whom shall we go?"
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]