RE: Problem with conditionnal page sequences
Hi Simon, You're confusing several things I think. First you're not only using XSL-FO but also XSLT, seen to your xsl:if statements. Furthermore you try to print tags in stead of elements. Printing only a start tag or an end tag is not possible in XSLT. When you do something like: xsl:if test=SOUSTHEME != following-sibling::FICHE[1]/SOUSTHEME !-- First I close the current sequence -- /fo:flow -- /fo:page-sequence snip/ /xsl:if You're XML is not wellformed anymore and no XML-Parser will accept it. It doesn't even reach the XSLT-parser or FO-parser. That's why you get the following error from the XML-Parser (probably Xerces). [Fatal Error] XMLToFO_CD.xsl:1295:3: The element type xsl:if must be terminated by the matching end-tag /xsl:if. XSL-Fo has the concept of conditional page masters http://www.dpawson.co.uk/xsl/sect3/pagelayout.html#d10268e184, but I wonder if this is what you need. Why do you need a new page master sequence for you're SvG. Why can't you include it in the new one. Maybe on a new page or something like that. Cheers, Agnes - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Misaligned text columns
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to set a document in two columns using fop (0.20.5). Unfortunately, when the two columns do not have exactly the same amount of material, the baselines of the first lines of the two columns do not align. They can be as much as 1.5 lines off. I cant think of a workaround in the general sense. You could try placing your content into a table, starting a new row for each paragraph and using keep-together=always on the rows. That way the top of each column would always start with a new paragraph and the baseline alignment may be improved. Another technique is to try to guess when a column has been filled and place break-after=column at appropriate places in the XSL-FO during XSLT processing. Very messy I know... fop does not seem to have implemented .minimum and .maximum (or .conditionality or .precedence) in space-before and space-after, so the vertical spaces in the columns are constant rather than mutable. This seems to be at least part of the problem; leastwise, mucking about with 'stretch' and 'shrink' values doesn't seem to help.. Neither does giving a value to display-align in the region-body make any difference. display-align is only implemented in block-containers and table cells. I'm rather mystified, since my reading of the XSL spec and Pawson's book gives me no clue how I could achieve this effect if I wanted to. They wouldnt give you any pointers to solve this problem, because they are written in general XSL-FO terms, with a fully compliant XSL-FO formatter in mind. In other words they are not written specifically for FOP users. Chris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fo:leader pattern=dots
Hello! I am using fo:leader with pattern=dots the fo code is like this fo:leader leader-pattern=dots rule-thickness=2pt leader-length=100% start-indent=10pt/ When I generate a PDF the rule is shown in PDF with dotted pattern. However when I print the PDF the rule is NOT AT ALL printed. This does not happen if I use leader-pattern=rule. I am using fop version 0.20.5 and I am embedding custom fonts with FOP. Any clues why this is happening? Abhi __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PCL is ok, PS is wrong orientation
Title: PCL is ok, PS is wrong orientation I have some server side Java code that does some FOP transformations (fop 0.20.5) and prints the resulting output to a printer. When I perform the transforation going to a PDF or PCL file, everything comes out fine. (The stylesheets I am using defines the page to be landscape). I get a landscape page with all my data on there. I couldn't get the PCL to print from our development Linux machine, however, so I switched from PCL to PostScript rendering. Now it tries to print the page in Portrait, cutting off the right side of the output. At first I thought it was the Java Print Service API or the print driver, but I downloaded a PostScript viewer to look at the rendered output, and fop is doing this. Here's a sample of my page definition if that's the culprit: fo:simple-page-master master-name=A4 page-width=297mm page-height=210mm margin-top=0.5in margin-bottom=0.0in margin-left=0.5in margin-right=0.5in Thanks for any insight! Robb
RE: leader pattern=dots
-Original Message- From: Abhijit Junnare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello! I am using fo:leader with pattern=dots the fo code is like this fo:leader leader-pattern=dots rule-thickness=2pt leader-length=100% start-indent=10pt/ When I generate a PDF the rule is shown in PDF with dotted pattern. However when I print the PDF the rule is NOT AT ALL printed. Strange... so it does show up in Acrobat, but not when you print it from there? (seems more like Acrobat-weirdness) This does not happen if I use leader-pattern=rule. snip / Any clues why this is happening? The only thing that comes to mind, is to try and use 'leader-pattern-width' for dots, instead of 'rule-thickness'... although I'm not at all sure whether this is the cause of the strange behaviour (you never know --maybe some tiny difference in PDF code when rendered?) Cheers, Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: leader pattern=dots
Tried with 'leader-pattern-width' but still it shows up in acrobat but will NOT PRINT when printed. seems very strange to me too. any more things come to anyones mind? When I generate a PDF the rule is shown in PDF with dotted pattern. However when I print the PDF the rule is NOT AT ALL printed. Strange... so it does show up in Acrobat, but not when you print it from there? (seems more like Acrobat-weirdness) This does not happen if I use leader-pattern=rule. snip / Any clues why this is happening? The only thing that comes to mind, is to try and use 'leader-pattern-width' for dots, instead of 'rule-thickness'... although I'm not at all sure whether this is the cause of the strange behaviour (you never know --maybe some tiny difference in PDF code when rendered?) Cheers, Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: leader pattern=dots
As I recall, there were problems getting fo:leader output to show anything besides rule under -awt -print. PDF correctly outputs/displays 'dots' and other types, but AWT does not. I checked in the fop-user archives (this has been discussed before), but I had trouble finding the thread, sorry. Perhaps someone else can shed more light on this, and provide the thread. Clay On Feb 11, 2004, at 11:39 AM, Abhijit Junnare wrote: Tried with 'leader-pattern-width' but still it shows up in acrobat but will NOT PRINT when printed. seems very strange to me too. any more things come to anyones mind? When I generate a PDF the rule is shown in PDF with dotted pattern. However when I print the PDF the rule is NOT AT ALL printed. Strange... so it does show up in Acrobat, but not when you print it from there? (seems more like Acrobat-weirdness) This does not happen if I use leader-pattern=rule. snip / Any clues why this is happening? The only thing that comes to mind, is to try and use 'leader-pattern-width' for dots, instead of 'rule-thickness'... although I'm not at all sure whether this is the cause of the strange behaviour (you never know --maybe some tiny difference in PDF code when rendered?) Cheers, Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PCL is ok, PS is wrong orientation
Title: PCL is ok, PS is wrong orientation By changing the definition of the printer in Linux we got PCL to print, so this is a moot point. Thanks anyways! --Robb -Original Message-From: Nicholson, Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 11:38 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: PCL is ok, PS is wrong orientation I have some server side Java code that does some FOP transformations (fop 0.20.5) and prints the resulting output to a printer. When I perform the transforation going to a PDF or PCL file, everything comes out fine. (The stylesheets I am using defines the page to be landscape). I get a landscape page with all my data on there. I couldn't get the PCL to print from our development Linux machine, however, so I switched from PCL to PostScript rendering. Now it tries to print the page in Portrait, cutting off the right side of the output. At first I thought it was the Java Print Service API or the print driver, but I downloaded a PostScript viewer to look at the rendered output, and fop is doing this. Here's a sample of my page definition if that's the culprit: fo:simple-page-master master-name="A4" page-width="297mm" page-height="210mm" margin-top="0.5in" margin-bottom="0.0in" margin-left="0.5in" margin-right="0.5in" Thanks for any insight! Robb
Re: PCL is ok, PS is wrong orientation
Good to hear. Anyway, if you still want this information, here's a couple of workarounds: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25882 On 11.02.2004 22:50:20 Nicholson, Robb wrote: By changing the definition of the printer in Linux we got PCL to print, so this is a moot point. Thanks anyways! --Robb -Original Message- From: Nicholson, Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 11:38 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: PCL is ok, PS is wrong orientation I have some server side Java code that does some FOP transformations (fop 0.20.5) and prints the resulting output to a printer. When I perform the transforation going to a PDF or PCL file, everything comes out fine. (The stylesheets I am using defines the page to be landscape). I get a landscape page with all my data on there. I couldn't get the PCL to print from our development Linux machine, however, so I switched from PCL to PostScript rendering. Now it tries to print the page in Portrait, cutting off the right side of the output. At first I thought it was the Java Print Service API or the print driver, but I downloaded a PostScript viewer to look at the rendered output, and fop is doing this. Here's a sample of my page definition if that's the culprit: fo:simple-page-master master-name=A4 page-width=297mm page-height=210mm margin-top=0.5in margin-bottom=0.0in margin-left=0.5in margin-right=0.5in Jeremias Maerki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
