Re: Absolute positioning

2007-03-15 Thread Chris Bowditch

Andreas L Delmelle wrote:


On Mar 15, 2007, at 02:28, Daniel Noll wrote:

Hi Daniel,

I see from the compliance page that absolute positioning is  
implemented. However in practice I have an FO file which uses  
absolute positioning and it seems like it doesn't take effect at all.


I culled all the containing elements from my FO output just in case  
they were to blame somehow, and the issue still occurred.  Here's  the 
block (apologies in advance for the way this is going to break):


 fo:block margin-left=0pt margin-right=0pt id=SlideObj  
font-size=16.0px unicode-bidi=embed visibility=hidden
   fo:external-graphic content-height=scale-to-fit content- 
width=scale-to-fit scaling=uniform src=url(file:/C:/Users/ 
Daniel/Desktop/testppt_files/slide0001_background.jpg) absolute- 
position=absolute height=100.0% width=100.0% left=0.0%  
top=0.0%/



Just a quick FYI:
don't expect the 'absolute-position' on fo:external-graphic and  
fo:inline to have *any* effect at all. The Common Absolute Position  
properties apply to neither of those FOs.


Just to add to what Andreas has told you: absolute-position does apply 
to block-container. So you can absolutely position block containers but 
not blocks, inlines or external-graphics. I also noticed that you are 
using percentages for width/height/left/top. That may work. I personally 
have only ever used absolutely positioned BC with units specified in mm. 
Also, note the subtle difference in meaning between 
absolute-position=absolute and absolute-position=fixed. IIRC, the 
fixed setting must be used to position the BC relative to the top left 
 of the page.


Chris




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Problem with font-weight 'bold' for custom font

2007-03-15 Thread Benjamin Schupp

Hi everybody,

switching to the fop-0.93 engine, i am facing problems with the pdf-rendering 
for font-weight=bold for my custom font 'NewsGothic'. The font is found by the 
engine, but is rendered only a bit wider, not bold. I am using the following 
configuration:

fop version=1.0
 base./base
 font-baseD:/fonts//font-base
 renderers
   renderer mime=application/pdf
 filterList
   valueflate/value
 /filterList
 fonts
   font metrics-url=NewsGothicLT.xml kerning=yes 
embed-file=lte50112.ttf
 font-triplet name=NewsGothic style=normal weight=normal /
   /font
   font metrics-url=NewsGothicLTBold.xml kerning=yes 
embed-file=lte50114.ttf
 font-triplet name=NewsGothic style=normal weight=bold /
   /font
 /fonts
   /renderer
 /renderers
/fop

The engine is running on a windows system with a j2re1.4.2_11.
Any help is highly appreciated!

Best regards,
Ben


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Problem with font-weight 'bold' for custom font

2007-03-15 Thread Manuel Mall
On Thursday 15 March 2007 20:16, Benjamin Schupp wrote:
 Hi everybody,

 switching to the fop-0.93 engine, i am facing problems with the
 pdf-rendering for font-weight=bold for my custom font 'NewsGothic'.
 The font is found by the engine, but is rendered only a bit wider,
 not bold. I am using the following configuration:

 fop version=1.0
   base./base
   font-baseD:/fonts//font-base
   renderers
 renderer mime=application/pdf
   filterList
 valueflate/value
   /filterList
   fonts
 font metrics-url=NewsGothicLT.xml kerning=yes
 embed-file=lte50112.ttf font-triplet name=NewsGothic
 style=normal weight=normal / /font
 font metrics-url=NewsGothicLTBold.xml kerning=yes
 embed-file=lte50114.ttf font-triplet name=NewsGothic
 style=normal weight=bold / /font
   /fonts
 /renderer
   /renderers
 /fop

 The engine is running on a windows system with a j2re1.4.2_11.
 Any help is highly appreciated!

Ben,

does what is rendered actually match the glyphs as defined in the font, 
that is does it match what a basic font viewer would show (not what for 
example MS Word would make out of it)?

The reason for the question is that (some) word processors can generate 
bold fonts from normal fonts by rendering the same glyph multiple times 
with a slight offset. FOP does not do that. It embeds the font 
unchanged and without any additional rendering instructions into the 
PDF (assuming you generate PDF).

 Best regards,
 Ben


Manuel

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



fop 0.20.5 and chinese pdf

2007-03-15 Thread mahmoudi ould abdel vetah

hello,

I'm using fop with cocoon and i publish pdf in two languages (french,
english). Now i want to add chinese content to my publications. so my
questions are :

- can i publish pdf with chinese caracters with fop 0.20.5?
- wich font i have to use in order to have chinese caracters (i know how to
configure new font with userconfig.xml)?

thanks for your help.

ps: i don't want to upgrade to new fop versions now (using fop embedded in
cocoon).


Re: Problem with font-weight 'bold' for custom font

2007-03-15 Thread Benjamin Schupp

Hi Manuel,

for some reason it now suddenly works ok!? thanx for your help anyways! 


Best regards,
Ben


Manuel Mall wrote:

On Thursday 15 March 2007 20:16, Benjamin Schupp wrote:

Hi everybody,

switching to the fop-0.93 engine, i am facing problems with the
pdf-rendering for font-weight=bold for my custom font 'NewsGothic'.
The font is found by the engine, but is rendered only a bit wider,
not bold. I am using the following configuration:

fop version=1.0
  base./base
  font-baseD:/fonts//font-base
  renderers
renderer mime=application/pdf
  filterList
valueflate/value
  /filterList
  fonts
font metrics-url=NewsGothicLT.xml kerning=yes
embed-file=lte50112.ttf font-triplet name=NewsGothic
style=normal weight=normal / /font
font metrics-url=NewsGothicLTBold.xml kerning=yes
embed-file=lte50114.ttf font-triplet name=NewsGothic
style=normal weight=bold / /font
  /fonts
/renderer
  /renderers
/fop

The engine is running on a windows system with a j2re1.4.2_11.
Any help is highly appreciated!


Ben,

does what is rendered actually match the glyphs as defined in the font, 
that is does it match what a basic font viewer would show (not what for 
example MS Word would make out of it)?


The reason for the question is that (some) word processors can generate 
bold fonts from normal fonts by rendering the same glyph multiple times 
with a slight offset. FOP does not do that. It embeds the font 
unchanged and without any additional rendering instructions into the 
PDF (assuming you generate PDF).



Best regards,
Ben



Manuel

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



linefeed-treatment=preserve and orphans/windows do not work as expected

2007-03-15 Thread Abel Braaksma

Hi Fop-users!

I believe this is a bug (perhaps I should better post it to fop-dev?). 
Personally, I do not need this feature, I tend to avoid 
linefeed-treatment altogether, I consider them evil ;)


The orphans and windows control is ignored completely when 
linefeed-treatment is set to preserve, even the default setting of 2 
is ignored, leaving one line on the next page instead of the expected 
two. To illustrate this behavior, here's a little 2inch square page:


fo:root xmlns:fo=http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format;
   fo:layout-master-set
   fo:simple-page-master
   master-name=test-page-master page-width=2in
   page-height=2in
   fo:region-body margin=0.35in/
   /fo:simple-page-master
   /fo:layout-master-set
   fo:page-sequence
   master-reference=test-page-master
   fo:flow flow-name=xsl-region-body
   fo:block widows=2 orphans=2
linefeed-treatment=preserveNeque
   porro quisquam
   est qui dolorem
   ipsum quia
   dolor sit amet,
   consectetur,
   adipisci velit.../fo:block
   /fo:flow
   /fo:page-sequence
/fo:root


The last line, adipisci velit... is placed on its own on the next 
page. Expected are the last two lines (even when widows/orhpans were not 
set).


I tested with FOP 0.93.

Cheers,
-- Abel

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: linefeed-treatment=preserve and orphans/windows do not work as expected

2007-03-15 Thread a_l . delmelle
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: Abel Braaksma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Hi Abel,

I believe this is a bug (perhaps I should better post it to fop-dev?).
Personally, I do not need this feature, I tend to avoid
linefeed-treatment altogether, I consider them evil ;)

It depends... if you ever find yourself in a position where you need to include 
blocks of source-code in your documents, you'll be very happy such a feature 
exists. :)

Another plus, as I recently indicated in another post: if your document 
contains a hundred fo:blocks consisting of a single word, merging all the 
blocks and using preserved linefeeds between the words is much better for the 
memory footprint than using separate blocks. This is especially true when one 
uses empty blocks to emulate a newline.


The orphans and windows control is ignored completely when
linefeed-treatment is set to preserve, even the default setting of 2
is ignored, leaving one line on the next page instead of the expected
two. To illustrate this behavior, here's a little 2inch square page:

That seems to be a bug indeed. Best reported through Bugzilla...

Anyway, thanks for bringing this to our attention.


Cheers,

Andreas




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: fop 0.20.5 and chinese pdf

2007-03-15 Thread Jeff Vannest
Arial Unicode MS font should work. Someone else will need to answer the
version question.

Jeff




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: fop 0.20.5 and chinese pdf

2007-03-15 Thread mahmoudi ould abdel vetah

thank you for your reply,

i used this font but i unfortunately get my pdf with # caracters...and my
pdf weight was something like 20Mo! (because this font is embedded in the
pdf, i think)

is there other font that i can try? or it's a limitation of my fop version (
0.20.5)?

thanks.


2007/3/15, Jeff Vannest [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


Arial Unicode MS font should work. Someone else will need to answer the
version question.

Jeff




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: fop 0.20.5 and chinese pdf

2007-03-15 Thread Markus Schütz

Hi,

it is definitely possible with FOP 0.20.5 - at least I succeeded in 
publishing Chinese documents (running FOP from the command line).

Besides Arial Unicode MS, SIMHEI and SIMSUN should work.
You will have to use the usual FOP tools to convert the TTF files into 
XML metric files required by FOP.


I cannot tell you whether it still works inside cocoon (I never tried to 
do that), but neither do I know any reason why it should fail.


Kind regards,
Markus

mahmoudi ould abdel vetah escribió:

hello,
 
I'm using fop with cocoon and i publish pdf in two languages (french, 
english). Now i want to add chinese content to my publications. so my 
questions are :
 
- can i publish pdf with chinese caracters with fop 0.20.5?
- wich font i have to use in order to have chinese caracters (i know 
how to configure new font with userconfig.xml)?
 
thanks for your help.
 
ps: i don't want to upgrade to new fop versions now (using fop 
embedded in cocoon).



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



'border-collapse=collapse' support in fop-0.93

2007-03-15 Thread Benjamin Schupp

Hi everybody,

I am facing a problem with the 'border-collapse=collapse' property on fo:tables 
- it seems to be ignored. Is it supported in the current 0.93 release at all? I 
could not find any definite answers.

The example in the 'fop-0.93-bin-jdk1.4.zip' distribution as triggered below 
gives the same warning messages as i am getting:
fop -fo examples/fo/tables/borders.fo -pdf borders.pdf

--- snip ---
Warning(1165/71): fo:table-column, In the separate border model 
(border-collapse=separate), borders are not applicable to fo:table-column, 
but a non-zero value for border was found.
--- snip ---

Regards,
Ben


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: 'border-collapse=collapse' support in fop-0.93

2007-03-15 Thread Abel Braaksma

Benjamin Schupp wrote:
I am facing a problem with the 'border-collapse=collapse' property on 
fo:tables - it seems to be ignored. Is it supported in the current 
0.93 release at all? I could not find any definite answers.


On the compliance page it is stated as collapsed table model is not yet 
completed:

http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/compliance.html#fo-property-border-collapse

Unfortunately, the implementation is far from trivial...

-- Abel Braaksma

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: 'border-collapse=collapse' support in fop-0.93

2007-03-15 Thread Chris Bowditch

Benjamin Schupp wrote:


Hi everybody,

I am facing a problem with the 'border-collapse=collapse' property on 
fo:tables - it seems to be ignored. Is it supported in the current 0.93 
release at all? I could not find any definite answers.


Neither FOP 0.93 nor the Trunk version currently support 
border-collapse=collapse. Sorry


snip/

Chris




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: 'border-collapse=collapse' support in fop-0.93

2007-03-15 Thread Benjamin Schupp

OK. Thanx for your help.
-- Ben


Abel Braaksma wrote:

Benjamin Schupp wrote:
I am facing a problem with the 'border-collapse=collapse' property on 
fo:tables - it seems to be ignored. Is it supported in the current 
0.93 release at all? I could not find any definite answers.


On the compliance page it is stated as collapsed table model is not yet 
completed:
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/compliance.html#fo-property-border-collapse 



Unfortunately, the implementation is far from trivial...

-- Abel Braaksma

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: fop 0.20.5 and chinese pdf

2007-03-15 Thread mahmoudi ould abdel vetah

tkanks,

i tried simsun and arial Uni with no result. i will try the other fonts that
you mentioned and i will be backon the same server i publish word
documents (using html!) with chinese caracters by using simsun with no pb.

is it normal that the xml generated from the arial TTF weights 8KO while the
weight of the ttf file is 23MO?

thanks




2007/3/15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:



I publish Chinese docs in 0.20.3 using the MSSONG font.  Works great - the
only downside is you need to embed the font in the PDF to get it to work and
that results in a larger PDF file.




  *Markus Schütz [EMAIL PROTECTED]*

03/15/2007 11:22 AM   Please respond to
fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org

   To
fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org  cc
  Subject
Re: fop 0.20.5 and chinese pdf




Hi,

it is definitely possible with FOP 0.20.5 - at least I succeeded in
publishing Chinese documents (running FOP from the command line).
Besides Arial Unicode MS, SIMHEI and SIMSUN should work.
You will have to use the usual FOP tools to convert the TTF files into
XML metric files required by FOP.

I cannot tell you whether it still works inside cocoon (I never tried to
do that), but neither do I know any reason why it should fail.

Kind regards,
Markus

mahmoudi ould abdel vetah escribió:
 hello,

 I'm using fop with cocoon and i publish pdf in two languages (french,
 english). Now i want to add chinese content to my publications. so my
 questions are :

 - can i publish pdf with chinese caracters with fop 0.20.5?
 - wich font i have to use in order to have chinese caracters (i know
 how to configure new font with userconfig.xml)?

 thanks for your help.

 ps: i don't want to upgrade to new fop versions now (using fop
 embedded in cocoon).


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





Re: fop 0.20.5 and chinese pdf

2007-03-15 Thread Markus Schütz
I guess you still have the problem that your fonts are not correctly 
embedded.
For convenience, you can throw the TTFs and XML font files in the same 
folder where you have your userconfig.xml file.
Also, make sure that the paths to all the font files in your userconfig 
file are correct!
Did you try to run FOP from the command line? Maybe that helps you to 
figure out what the problem actually is.


Well, 23 MB sound a bit much, on the other hand, version 0.20.5 and its 
predecessors are not famous for effective PDF compression. Since you 
want to publish your documents using Cocoon, I suppose you want them 
on-the-fly, with no postprocessing. Saving the PDF file with Adobe 
Acrobat will definitely let off  air, but maybe this is not an option.


Kind regards,
Markus

mahmoudi ould abdel vetah escribió:

tkanks,
 
i tried simsun and arial Uni with no result. i will try the other 
fonts that you mentioned and i will be backon the same server i 
publish word documents (using html!) with chinese caracters by using 
simsun with no pb.
 
is it normal that the xml generated from the arial TTF weights 8KO 
while the weight of the ttf file is 23MO?
 
thanks
 
 



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: fop 0.20.5 and chinese pdf

2007-03-15 Thread Kai Mütz
mahmoudi ould abdel vetah  wrote:
 tkanks,

 i tried simsun and arial Uni with no result. i will try the other
 fonts that you mentioned and i will be backon the same server i
 publish word documents (using html!) with chinese caracters by using
 simsun with no pb.

 is it normal that the xml generated from the arial TTF weights 8KO
 while the weight of the ttf file is 23MO?

The XML metric file I generated with fop 0.93 has 707KB. Perhaps the metric
file was not generated correctly.

Kai


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



page numbering in fo/pdf output (FOP 0.93)

2007-03-15 Thread Hinrich Aue
Hello everybody,

 

I've noticed that you can change page numbering in a PDF in the following
way:

 

In out PDF generated with FOP (from docbook of course) the page number
displayer in adobe reader looks like this:

 

1 of 100

 

for page 1. Even though page 1 is numbered I (roman)

due to this in our document the first page numbered Arabic is

 

20 of 100

 

Though the page number _on_ the page is 1.

 

But you can make it look like this:

 

II (2 of 100)

 

And

 

1 (20 if 100)

 

Is this possible in docbook/fop? 

 

Thanks,

Hinrich

 



Re: fop 0.20.5 and chinese pdf

2007-03-15 Thread Jeff Vannest
Yes, embedding is really the only way to go, and yes, the file will be PDF
smaller because only the glyphs that are used are embedded, not all glyphs
in the font.

Jeff




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: fop 0.20.5 and chinese pdf

2007-03-15 Thread mahmoudi ould abdel vetah

thanks,

Markus, the command line is a good idea, i will try this.

Kai, what was the weight of your ttf file? (23MO or more?). i'm agree with
you that it's possible that my xml file was wrongly generated!

thanks



2007/3/15, Kai Mütz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


mahmoudi ould abdel vetah  wrote:
 tkanks,

 i tried simsun and arial Uni with no result. i will try the other
 fonts that you mentioned and i will be backon the same server i
 publish word documents (using html!) with chinese caracters by using
 simsun with no pb.

 is it normal that the xml generated from the arial TTF weights 8KO
 while the weight of the ttf file is 23MO?

The XML metric file I generated with fop 0.93 has 707KB. Perhaps the
metric
file was not generated correctly.

Kai


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: fop 0.20.5 and chinese pdf

2007-03-15 Thread Kai Mütz
mahmoudi ould abdel vetah  wrote:
 thanks,
 
 Markus, the command line is a good idea, i will try this.
 
 Kai, what was the weight of your ttf file? (23MO or more?). i'm agree
 with you that it's possible that my xml file was wrongly generated! 

23MB

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



command line question [newbie]

2007-03-15 Thread Braumüller , Hans
Hi friends,

I have following command line problem on windows system:

Because FOP 0.20.5  cannot handle passing parameter, i am trying doing the 
fo.file with xalan.
As second step passing the output file to fop:

 xalan   -PARAM docName finance -IN fw-forms.xml -XSL pdf38.xsl  -OUT temp.fop
 fop   -fo temp.fop -pdf finance-doc.pdf   

But i am getting: Missing argument for option: -OUT

Why?

Thanks

Hans Braumüller
Ist http://kunstserie.com Netzkunst?























 




--
Besuchen Sie Hanse Orga vom 27. - 28.03.2007 beim
Internationalen SAP-Kongress für Versicherungen
Payment Factory in SAP®: Zahlungsverkehr mit dem ipcNavigator® 
Moneta® fuer SAP®: Integriertes Finanzmanagement in SAP 
AutoBank® fuer SAP®: Kontoauszugsverarbeitung (FI/FS-CD) 
Sie finden uns in der 1. Etage / Stand-Nr. 14!
--
NEU: Registrieren Sie sich jetzt fuer den Hanse Orga Newsletter! 

 
Hanse Orga AG, Oldesloer Strasse 63, 22457 Hamburg, Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 
80900, Steuer-Nr. 054 850 02946, Ust-ID-Nr. DE 118662733
Aufsichtsratvorsitzender Fritz Horst Melsheimer; Vorstandsvorsitzender 
Hans-Herbert Lindemann; Vorstand Sven Lindemann; Vorstand Stephan Benkendorf

Diese E-Mail enthaelt vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschuetzte 
Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail 
irrtuemlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und 
vernichten Sie diese E-Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte 
Weitergabe dieser E-Mail ist nicht gestattet.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Changing the font global?

2007-03-15 Thread Thomas Zastrow

Hi there,

if I have a block with no font-family-attribute, FOP uses a serife-font. 
Is it possible to change this document-wide  to another font?


Thank you!

Best,

Tom


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE : Changing the font global?

2007-03-15 Thread Demers, Christian
You can set font globaly by setting it at on page-sequence diretly

Example:fo:page-sequence master-reference=document
font-size=8pt font-family=arial,serif

Regards,

Christian

-Message d'origine-
De : Thomas Zastrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Envoyé : jeudi, mars 15, 2007 15:24
À : fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Objet : Changing the font global?


Hi there,

if I have a block with no font-family-attribute, FOP uses a serife-font.
Is it possible to change this document-wide  to another font?

Thank you!

Best,

Tom


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  _  

Ce message est confidentiel, à l'usage exclusif du destinataire
ci-dessus et son contenu ne représente en aucun cas un engagement de la
part de AXA, sauf en cas de stipulation expresse et par écrit de la part
de AXA. Toute publication, utilisation ou diffusion, même partielle,
doit être autorisée préalablement. Si vous n'êtes pas destinataire de ce
message, merci d'en avertir immédiatement l'expéditeur.

This e-mail message is confidential, for the exclusive use of the
addressee and its contents shall not constitute a commitment by AXA,
except as otherwise specifically provided in writing by AXA. Any
unauthorized disclosure, use or dissemination, either whole or partial,
is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of the message,
please notify the sender immediately.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: RE : Changing the font global?

2007-03-15 Thread Thomas Zastrow

Demers, Christian schrieb:

You can set font globaly by setting it at on page-sequence diretly

Example:fo:page-sequence master-reference=document
font-size=8pt font-family=arial,serif

  

Christian, thank you very much! Works perfect!

Best,

Tom


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: command line question [newbie]

2007-03-15 Thread Dudley, Mark
Try putting the -OUT before the -IN 

-Original Message-
From: Braumüller, Hans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 12:15 PM
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: command line question [newbie]

Hi friends,

I have following command line problem on windows system:

Because FOP 0.20.5  cannot handle passing parameter, i am trying doing the 
fo.file with xalan.
As second step passing the output file to fop:

 xalan   -PARAM docName finance -IN fw-forms.xml -XSL pdf38.xsl  -OUT temp.fop
 fop   -fo temp.fop -pdf finance-doc.pdf   

But i am getting: Missing argument for option: -OUT

Why?

Thanks

Hans Braumüller
Ist http://kunstserie.com Netzkunst?























 




--
Besuchen Sie Hanse Orga vom 27. - 28.03.2007 beim Internationalen SAP-Kongress 
für Versicherungen Payment Factory in SAP®: Zahlungsverkehr mit dem 
ipcNavigator® Moneta® fuer SAP®: Integriertes Finanzmanagement in SAP AutoBank® 
fuer SAP®: Kontoauszugsverarbeitung (FI/FS-CD) Sie finden uns in der 1. Etage / 
Stand-Nr. 14!
--
NEU: Registrieren Sie sich jetzt fuer den Hanse Orga Newsletter! 

 
Hanse Orga AG, Oldesloer Strasse 63, 22457 Hamburg, Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 
80900, Steuer-Nr. 054 850 02946, Ust-ID-Nr. DE 118662733 
Aufsichtsratvorsitzender Fritz Horst Melsheimer; Vorstandsvorsitzender 
Hans-Herbert Lindemann; Vorstand Sven Lindemann; Vorstand Stephan Benkendorf

Diese E-Mail enthaelt vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschuetzte 
Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail 
irrtuemlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und 
vernichten Sie diese E-Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte 
Weitergabe dieser E-Mail ist nicht gestattet.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Absolute positioning

2007-03-15 Thread Daniel Noll
- Original Message - 
From: Chris Bowditch [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 9:02 PM
Subject: Re: Absolute positioning



Andreas L Delmelle wrote:


On Mar 15, 2007, at 02:28, Daniel Noll wrote:

Hi Daniel,

I see from the compliance page that absolute positioning is 
implemented. However in practice I have an FO file which uses  absolute 
positioning and it seems like it doesn't take effect at all.


I culled all the containing elements from my FO output just in case 
they were to blame somehow, and the issue still occurred.  Here's  the 
block (apologies in advance for the way this is going to break):


 fo:block margin-left=0pt margin-right=0pt id=SlideObj 
font-size=16.0px unicode-bidi=embed visibility=hidden
   fo:external-graphic content-height=scale-to-fit content- 
width=scale-to-fit scaling=uniform src=url(file:/C:/Users/ 
Daniel/Desktop/testppt_files/slide0001_background.jpg) absolute- 
position=absolute height=100.0% width=100.0% left=0.0% 
top=0.0%/



Just a quick FYI:
don't expect the 'absolute-position' on fo:external-graphic and 
fo:inline to have *any* effect at all. The Common Absolute Position 
properties apply to neither of those FOs.


Just to add to what Andreas has told you: absolute-position does apply to 
block-container. So you can absolutely position block containers but not 
blocks, inlines or external-graphics. I also noticed that you are using 
percentages for width/height/left/top. That may work. I personally have 
only ever used absolutely positioned BC with units specified in mm. Also, 
note the subtle difference in meaning between absolute-position=absolute 
and absolute-position=fixed. IIRC, the fixed setting must be used to 
position the BC relative to the top left of the page.



Well in actual fact, it isn't me using percentages or fo:inline, as it's 
coming out of someone else's library. :-)


The best I can hope to do is contain things in blocks if they can't handle 
the absolute positioning themselves, by using XSLT.


Problem is that even if I take the example above and wrap 
fo:block-container and fo:block around the inlines, it still doesn't 
work as expected.  But I imagine the transform I've already done here has 
somewhat improved the validity of the FO output.


Daniel Noll

Nuix Pty Ltd
Suite 79, 89 Jones St, Ultimo NSW 2007, AustraliaPh: +61 2 9280 0699
Web: http://nuix.com/   Fax: +61 2 9212 6902

This message is intended only for the named recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying,
distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this
message or attachment is strictly prohibited.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]