Re: ipfw delete 100-300
03.08.2015, 17:14, Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au: On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 17:38:18 +0800, Julian Elischer wrote: my reading of the code I can see that 'ipfw delete 100-300' doesn't work (well I know it doesn't work, but I had thought it was a bug), Now I see that its just 'not supported' I implemented the kernel range deletion, but converted userland part as-is. Should work on HEAD now (r286232). It may be my imagination but (distant) past? I was surprised too; ISTR having used that before too, but I may misremember remembering .. I also had a feeling that this syntax should work (maybe because it silently accepted ranged queries) but I couldn't find any presence of real ranged deletion support in SVN. On 9.3 with rules 100-1000 in 100's, 'ipfw delete 600-800' deletes only 600 .. without complaint, returning 0 if 600 existed. NG for scripts. cheers, Ian ___ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ipfw-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ipfw-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ipfw delete 100-300
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 17:38:18 +0800, Julian Elischer wrote: my reading of the code I can see that 'ipfw delete 100-300' doesn't work (well I know it doesn't work, but I had thought it was a bug), Now I see that its just 'not supported' It may be my imagination but (distant) past? I was surprised too; ISTR having used that before too, but I may misremember remembering .. On 9.3 with rules 100-1000 in 100's, 'ipfw delete 600-800' deletes only 600 .. without complaint, returning 0 if 600 existed. NG for scripts. cheers, Ian ___ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ipfw-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ipfw delete 100-300
On 8/3/15 10:50 PM, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote: 03.08.2015, 17:14, Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au: On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 17:38:18 +0800, Julian Elischer wrote: my reading of the code I can see that 'ipfw delete 100-300' doesn't work (well I know it doesn't work, but I had thought it was a bug), Now I see that its just 'not supported' I implemented the kernel range deletion, but converted userland part as-is. Should work on HEAD now (r286232). great! Pitty I'm stuck working on 8.0 :-) maybe I can back-port it. It may be my imagination but (distant) past? I was surprised too; ISTR having used that before too, but I may misremember remembering .. I also had a feeling that this syntax should work (maybe because it silently accepted ranged queries) but I couldn't find any presence of real ranged deletion support in SVN. On 9.3 with rules 100-1000 in 100's, 'ipfw delete 600-800' deletes only 600 .. without complaint, returning 0 if 600 existed. NG for scripts. cheers, Ian ___ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ipfw-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ipfw-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ipfw-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
