Re: sudo 1.6.9 Last login problem
Currently when I run sudo I'm getting a "Last login" line output
before every command,
pam_lastlog(8) makes the message. If you don't need it, comment out
'session include system' line in ${LOCALBASE}/etc/pam.d/sudo.
--
Makoto `MAR' Matsushita
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
port NetXMS
Hi, all. please appreciate my first port NetXMS http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/114495 NetXMS is new and rapidly developing monitoring system, released under GPL2 license. It can be used for monitoring entire IT infrastructure, starting with SNMP-capable hardware (like switches and routers) and ending with applications on your servers. NetXMS is an extremely reliable and powerful monitoring system, enabling you to improve your network availability and service levels. /Ermakov Vladimir ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
How to include new dirs in @INC
I'm working on a port upgrade, and I'm copying some perl modules to %%SITE_PERL%%/mach/newdir. Unfortunately, the scripts won't run because the perl modules aren't included in @INC. How do I update @INC to include the new path? (I have USE_PERL= yes in the Makefile.) Is there a script I have to run? Is there an ldconfig for perl? Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/
Re: Unusual sudo / w behaviour - 0 users?
On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 16:48 -0400, Tom McLaughlin wrote: > On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 19:45 +1000, Paul Fraser wrote: > > Hi Tom (and ports list by CC), > > > > After an upgrade to sudo v1.6.9 on my 6-STABLE workstation, I've > > noticed some interesting behaviour with regards to interaction between > > sudo and w. > > > > Check the output below for an example. > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ sudo -V > > Sudo version 1.6.9 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ w > > 7:42PM up 8 days, 7:46, 1 user, load averages: 0.11, 0.10, 0.15 > > USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT > > pfraser p0 core-server01 7:38PM - w > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ sudo -s > > Last login: Sun Jul 22 19:36:22 on ttyp1 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# w > > 7:42PM up 8 days, 7:46, 0 users, load averages: 0.10, 0.09, 0.15 > > USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# > > > > Note there is now no active session listed? If I then drop out of the > > sudo session, the problem persists. > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# exit > > exit > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ w > > 7:44PM up 8 days, 7:47, 0 users, load averages: 0.27, 0.15, 0.17 > > USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ > > > > I'm afraid I'm not familiar enough with the inner workings of all the > > related systems and can't be of much more assistance (at least > > initially), but I'm quite welcome to perform any testing you require. > > You may just need to hold my hand a little bit! > > > > I'm not sure if this is a sudo bug or a -STABLE bug. I can only > reproduce this on -STABLE with sudo 1.6.9. -CURRENT with 1.6.9 and > 1.6.8p12 works fine and -STABLE with sudo 1.6.8p12 works fine. I did a > little more experimenting and saw this behavior below. > > -STABLE: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] tom]$ last > tom ttyp2bofh Sun Jul 22 16:16 still logged in > ... > [EMAIL PROTECTED] tom]$ sudo -s > # last | head -n 5 > root ttyp2 Sun Jul 22 16:16 - 16:16 (00:00) > tom ttyp2bofh Sun Jul 22 16:16 - 16:16 (00:00) > ... > # ^D > [EMAIL PROTECTED] tom]$ last > root ttyp2 Sun Jul 22 16:16 - 16:16 (00:00) > tom ttyp2bofh Sun Jul 22 16:16 - 16:16 (00:00) > > > -CURRENT: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] tom]$ last > tom ttyp1bofh Sun Jul 22 16:18 still logged in > ... > [EMAIL PROTECTED] tom]$ sudo -s > # last | head -n 6 > tom ttyp1bofh Sun Jul 22 16:18 still logged in > ... > # ^D > [EMAIL PROTECTED] tom]$ last > tom ttyp1bofh Sun Jul 22 16:18 still logged in > > > I'm going to do a little more digging and figure out if this is caused > by a behavior difference in sudo or FreeBSD. > > tom Yeah, I was totally wrong above. The issue is caused by pam_lastlog. I forgot I had commented out the session line in the pam file on my -CURRENT box to shutup the login message everytime I ran a command via sudo. It's not an issue on my CentOS box so it appears to be an issue with our pam_lastlog. I'm going to ask on freebsd-security@ tom -- | tmclaugh at sdf.lonestar.org tmclaugh at FreeBSD.org | | FreeBSD http://www.FreeBSD.org | ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: sudo 1.6.9 segfault
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 10:12 +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote: > On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 13:19:35 -0400 > Tom McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 16:39 +0600, yarodin wrote: > > > Jul 21 15:12:01 home sudo:admin : TTY=unknown ; PWD=/home/admin ; > > > USER=root ; COMMAND=/sbin/ipfw > > > Jul 21 15:12:36 home kernel: pid 42226 (sudo), uid 0: exited on signal 11 > > > > I need a little more information. > > > > sudoers: > > tom LOCAL = NOPASSWD: /sbin/ipfw > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] tom]$ sudo ipfw > > Last login: Sat Jul 21 13:09:52 on ttyp0 > > usage: ipfw [options] > > do "ipfw -h" or see ipfw manpage for details > > > > What options are you using in the port? What does your sudoers look > > like? Also, I'm curious why TTY would show up as unknown in the log. > > > > tom > > > > Hi, > I can reproduce the sigfault with .1.6.9., but not with 1.6.8.12. > 1.6.9 does NOT sigfault when run from a shell, but it does if called from a > menu or launcher in XFCE. For example, i have sudo configured to allow me to > run sudo wireshark without password. > > from an shell (in Terminal, actually), sudo wireshark works fine. > From the launcher or menu option which executes 'sudo wireshark' , i get a > sigfault. > > I tried to trace the call with > ktrace -f /tmp/SUDOKTRACE -d sudo wireshark > > but i only get up to the loading of ld-elf ... > > If you have any tests to suggest, let me know. > B I've just committed the fix for this. You should be fine after you update. tom -- | tmclaugh at sdf.lonestar.org tmclaugh at FreeBSD.org | | FreeBSD http://www.FreeBSD.org | ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: sudo 1.6.9 segfault
On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 09:09 +0600, yarodin wrote:
> В сообщении от Saturday 21 July 2007 23:19:35 вы написали:
> > On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 16:39 +0600, yarodin wrote:
> > > Jul 21 15:12:01 home sudo:admin : TTY=unknown ; PWD=/home/admin ;
> > > USER=root ; COMMAND=/sbin/ipfw
> > > Jul 21 15:12:36 home kernel: pid 42226 (sudo), uid 0: exited on signal 11
> >
> > I need a little more information.
> >
> > sudoers:
> > tom LOCAL = NOPASSWD: /sbin/ipfw
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] tom]$ sudo ipfw
> > Last login: Sat Jul 21 13:09:52 on ttyp0
> > usage: ipfw [options]
> > do "ipfw -h" or see ipfw manpage for details
> >
> > What options are you using in the port? What does your sudoers look
> > like? Also, I'm curious why TTY would show up as unknown in the log.
> >
> > tom
>
> Subject: Re: 1.6.9 crash on freebsd 6-stable
> From: "Todd C. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: 21/07/07 21:14
>
> Thanks for the stack trace. I believe the problem is that the
> pam_sm_close_session function in pam_lastlog.c does not check that
>
> pam_get_item(pamh, PAM_TTY, (const void **)&tty);
>
> succeeded before using the tty variable. In the case of kdesu there
> is probably no tty so that variable is being used uninitialized.
> This is really a FreeBSD bug; there is a check in pam_sm_open_session
> that is missing in the pam_sm_close_session code.
>
> I've included two diffs. One is a work-around for sudo, the other
> a fix for the FreeBSD issue. If you could file a bug with FreeBSD
> and include the fix I'd appreciate it.
>
> - todd
>
Awesome. I'll commit the sudo patch shortly. I have just one other
issues to look at which I'm almost done with figuring out. I'll also
file a PR for libpam.
tom
> Index: lib/libpam/modules/pam_lastlog/pam_lastlog.c
> ===
> RCS file: /home/cvs/freebsd/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_lastlog/pam_lastlog.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.21
> diff -u -r1.21 pam_lastlog.c
> --- lib/libpam/modules/pam_lastlog/pam_lastlog.c11 Aug 2006
> 17:03:33 - 1.21
> +++ lib/libpam/modules/pam_lastlog/pam_lastlog.c21 Jul 2007
> 15:11:39 -
> @@ -177,9 +177,12 @@
> pam_sm_close_session(pam_handle_t *pamh __unused, int flags __unused,
> int argc __unused, const char *argv[] __unused)
> {
> + int pam_err;
> const void *tty;
>
> -pam_get_item(pamh, PAM_TTY, (const void **)&tty);
> + pam_err = pam_get_item(pamh, PAM_TTY, (const void **)&tty);
> + if (pam_err != PAM_SUCCESS)
> + goto err;
> if (strncmp(tty, _PATH_DEV, strlen(_PATH_DEV)) == 0)
> tty = (const char *)tty + strlen(_PATH_DEV);
> if (*(const char *)tty == '\0')
> @@ -189,6 +192,10 @@
> __func__, (const char *)tty);
> logwtmp(tty, "", "");
> return (PAM_SUCCESS);
> +err:
> + if (openpam_get_option(pamh, "no_fail"))
> + return (PAM_SUCCESS);
> + return (pam_err);
> }
>
> PAM_MODULE_ENTRY("pam_lastlog");
>
> ===
> --- auth/pam.c.orig Tue Jun 12 07:41:12 2007
> +++ auth/pam.c Sat Jul 21 22:31:43 2007
> @@ -94,7 +94,9 @@
> log_error(USE_ERRNO|NO_EXIT|NO_MAIL, "unable to initialize PAM");
> return(AUTH_FATAL);
> }
> -if (strcmp(user_tty, "unknown"))
> +if (strcmp(user_tty, "unknown") == 0)
> +(void) pam_set_item(pamh, PAM_TTY, "");
> +else
> (void) pam_set_item(pamh, PAM_TTY, user_tty);
>
> return(AUTH_SUCCESS);
--
| tmclaugh at sdf.lonestar.org tmclaugh at FreeBSD.org |
| FreeBSD http://www.FreeBSD.org |
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: FreeBSD Port: samba-3.0.25a_1,1
Hi, Mads! On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 04:54:57PM +0200, Mads L?nsethagen wrote: > Hi! > > I've noticed a bug in this recent version of Samba which forced me to > downgrade to version 3.0.24,1. It has something to do with > fusefs-unionfs, but I don't know how. I suspect, this is the sign of the same error we have with other non-UFS file systems in Samba3. See, for example: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4715 There are also similar ports/109160, ports/113158 and few others. So, the problem known, although there is no real cure for it right now... With regards, Timur Bakeyev. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: sudo 1.6.9 segfault
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 13:19:35 -0400
Tom McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 16:39 +0600, yarodin wrote:
> > Jul 21 15:12:01 home sudo:admin : TTY=unknown ; PWD=/home/admin ;
> > USER=root ; COMMAND=/sbin/ipfw
> > Jul 21 15:12:36 home kernel: pid 42226 (sudo), uid 0: exited on signal 11
>
> I need a little more information.
>
> sudoers:
> tom LOCAL = NOPASSWD: /sbin/ipfw
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] tom]$ sudo ipfw
> Last login: Sat Jul 21 13:09:52 on ttyp0
> usage: ipfw [options]
> do "ipfw -h" or see ipfw manpage for details
>
> What options are you using in the port? What does your sudoers look
> like? Also, I'm curious why TTY would show up as unknown in the log.
>
> tom
>
Hi,
I can reproduce the sigfault with .1.6.9., but not with 1.6.8.12.
1.6.9 does NOT sigfault when run from a shell, but it does if called from a
menu or launcher in XFCE. For example, i have sudo configured to allow me to
run sudo wireshark without password.
from an shell (in Terminal, actually), sudo wireshark works fine.
From the launcher or menu option which executes 'sudo wireshark' , i get a
sigfault.
I tried to trace the call with
ktrace -f /tmp/SUDOKTRACE -d sudo wireshark
but i only get up to the loading of ld-elf ...
If you have any tests to suggest, let me know.
B
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
"Always do right. This will gratify some and astonish the rest."
Mark Twain
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet.
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been
Warned.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Eclipse Aptana (Was Re: eclipse 3.3.0)
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 07:56:49 -0700
David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes Aptana provides full support for rails developments and integrates really
> well with subversion. If you use Ruby on Rails and Ajax on Rails as part of
> Ruby development tools I would recomend Aptana without hesitation. IMHO I do
> not feel there is a stonger or more fully feature IDE for an IDE.
Thanks David,
great - but do you know if it provides anything other than the combination of
the RDT, subclipse and WST plugins?
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that
take our breath away.
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet.
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been
Warned.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: geography category adoption
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 09:20:01PM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Edwin Groothuis p??e v ne 22. 07. 2007 v 23:32 +1000:
> > On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 12:57:07AM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > > Virtual category "geography" was created some time ago. Is anybody
> > > willing to scan the tree and add some ports to that category?
> >
> > ports/64304 is marked as suspended.
> >
> > Mark it as open, throw it back in the pool and let the sharks feast
> > on it!
>
> I don't see how `suspended' status on that PR is preventing people from
> adding ports to the category.
The status of the port ("suspended", not "analyzed" or "patched")
plus the comments in the PR ("This is probably still a good idea,
if we can find someone willing to write the patch and help do the
testing.") doesn't really make me go like "This *is* already
implemented, let's see if I can add it to the ports mentioned in
it".
But the sharks have feasted, nothing to worry about anymore.
Edwin
--
Edwin Groothuis |Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Unusual sudo / w behaviour - 0 users?
On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 19:45 +1000, Paul Fraser wrote: > Hi Tom (and ports list by CC), > > After an upgrade to sudo v1.6.9 on my 6-STABLE workstation, I've > noticed some interesting behaviour with regards to interaction between > sudo and w. > > Check the output below for an example. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ sudo -V > Sudo version 1.6.9 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ w > 7:42PM up 8 days, 7:46, 1 user, load averages: 0.11, 0.10, 0.15 > USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT > pfraser p0 core-server01 7:38PM - w > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ sudo -s > Last login: Sun Jul 22 19:36:22 on ttyp1 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# w > 7:42PM up 8 days, 7:46, 0 users, load averages: 0.10, 0.09, 0.15 > USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# > > Note there is now no active session listed? If I then drop out of the > sudo session, the problem persists. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# exit > exit > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ w > 7:44PM up 8 days, 7:47, 0 users, load averages: 0.27, 0.15, 0.17 > USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ > > I'm afraid I'm not familiar enough with the inner workings of all the > related systems and can't be of much more assistance (at least > initially), but I'm quite welcome to perform any testing you require. > You may just need to hold my hand a little bit! > I'm not sure if this is a sudo bug or a -STABLE bug. I can only reproduce this on -STABLE with sudo 1.6.9. -CURRENT with 1.6.9 and 1.6.8p12 works fine and -STABLE with sudo 1.6.8p12 works fine. I did a little more experimenting and saw this behavior below. -STABLE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tom]$ last tom ttyp2bofh Sun Jul 22 16:16 still logged in ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] tom]$ sudo -s # last | head -n 5 root ttyp2 Sun Jul 22 16:16 - 16:16 (00:00) tom ttyp2bofh Sun Jul 22 16:16 - 16:16 (00:00) ... # ^D [EMAIL PROTECTED] tom]$ last root ttyp2 Sun Jul 22 16:16 - 16:16 (00:00) tom ttyp2bofh Sun Jul 22 16:16 - 16:16 (00:00) -CURRENT: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tom]$ last tom ttyp1bofh Sun Jul 22 16:18 still logged in ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] tom]$ sudo -s # last | head -n 6 tom ttyp1bofh Sun Jul 22 16:18 still logged in ... # ^D [EMAIL PROTECTED] tom]$ last tom ttyp1bofh Sun Jul 22 16:18 still logged in I'm going to do a little more digging and figure out if this is caused by a behavior difference in sudo or FreeBSD. tom -- | tmclaugh at sdf.lonestar.org tmclaugh at FreeBSD.org | | FreeBSD http://www.FreeBSD.org | ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Unfetchable distfiles in recent openoffice ports
Hello, I can't get any source tarball for ooorg-2.x. The OOo_OOF680_m18_source.tar.bz2 seems to be very uncommon, I couldn't find that tarball on any mirror. Is there a known solution? Best regards, -Harry ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: mulberry mail crashes when using PGP under AMD64 ... ?
+-Le 21/07/07 18:53 -0300, Marc G. Fournier a dit : | | Running latest -STABLE of FreeBSD on an 64bit Dual Core, mulberry mail | seems to run okay until such a point in time as I try to PGP Sign/Encrypt | an email and send it out, then it 'Seg Faults' ... | | gpg appears to run fine from the command line, using gpg --list-keys ... | | Anyone running Mulberry + 6-STABLE + AMD64 kernel successfully? Hum, I've had some kind of the same problem on i386, and, hum, I don't recall what solution I finally found, but I think it was a FreeBSD/linux locale conflict. -- Mathieu Arnold pgpRmh3HE7mBo.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: geography category adoption
Pav Lucistnik wrote: Edwin Groothuis píše v ne 22. 07. 2007 v 23:32 +1000: On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 12:57:07AM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote: Virtual category "geography" was created some time ago. Is anybody willing to scan the tree and add some ports to that category? ports/64304 is marked as suspended. Mark it as open, throw it back in the pool and let the sharks feast on it! I don't see how `suspended' status on that PR is preventing people from adding ports to the category. Sharks - go! I just committed 58 ports to this category. We've come to an agreement that GPS, Weather, GIS, and GeoIP related ports should belong here, let me know if I missed any. -Frank ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: geography category adoption
Edwin Groothuis píše v ne 22. 07. 2007 v 23:32 +1000: > On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 12:57:07AM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > Virtual category "geography" was created some time ago. Is anybody > > willing to scan the tree and add some ports to that category? > > ports/64304 is marked as suspended. > > Mark it as open, throw it back in the pool and let the sharks feast > on it! I don't see how `suspended' status on that PR is preventing people from adding ports to the category. Sharks - go! -- Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> How will you recognize experienced hacker from beginner? Beginner thinks that kilobyte have 1000 bytes. Experienced hacker thinks one kilometer have 1024 meters. signature.asc Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy
Re: geography category adoption
Norberto Meijome píše v ne 22. 07. 2007 v 23:26 +1000: > On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 00:57:07 +0200 > Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Virtual category "geography" was created some time ago. Is anybody > > willing to scan the tree and add some ports to that category? > > Hi Pav, > where can I find some description of what is expected to be found in this > 'geography' category? > > if anything related to geo > net/GeoIP makes sense in net and also in geography (relates to matching IP to > country) > > only related to GIS ? It's virtual category, so GeoIP stays in net, but can grow geography as a secondary category. I think GeoIP is a good candidate. I think GIS, GPS related, localization services like GeoIP, maps, etc.. -- Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> God is real unless declared integer. signature.asc Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy
Re: emacs upgrade question
--- Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2007-Jul-21 10:34:36 -0700, Brian Gruber > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Now I'm ready to upgrade to emacs 22. What's the > >correct procedure for this? I'm guessing perhaps > it's > >to set the var in make.conf to emacs22 and then do > >'portupgrade -fr emacs'. > > You no longer have 'emacs' installed. I would > suggest removing > 'EMACS_PORT_NAME' (which defaults to emacs22 and > causes problems > with some ports if set) and using: > # portupgrade -f -o editors/emacs emacs21 > i'm sorry, but this appears to be just wrong. The package name (which is what is being specified as the last argument) is still emacs: $ portupgrade -nfo editors/emacs emacs21 ---> Session started at: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 12:43:21 -0400 ** No such installed package: emacs21 ** None has been installed or upgraded. ---> Session ended at: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 12:43:21 -0400 (consumed 00:00:00) $ portupgrade -no editors/emacs emacs ---> Session started at: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 12:43:44 -0400 ---> Upgrade of editors/emacs started at: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 12:43:47 -0400 ---> Upgrading 'emacs-21.3_10' to 'emacs-22.1' (editors/emacs) OK? [no] ---> Upgrade of editors/emacs ended at: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 12:43:47 -0400 (consumed 00:00:00) ---> ** Upgrade tasks 1: 1 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 0 failed ---> Listing the results (+:done / -:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) + editors/emacs (emacs-21.3_10) ---> Packages processed: 1 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 0 failed ---> Session ended at: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 12:43:47 -0400 (consumed 00:00:02) So I ask again, what is the correct way to upgrade to emacs22 when I've already followed the instructions in UPGRADING to keep emacs21? My current guess is: 1) set EMACS_PORT_NAME=emacs22 in make.conf 2) portupgrade -fro editors/emacs emacs /brian Building a website is a piece of cake. Yahoo! Small Business gives you all the tools to get online. http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/webhosting ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Sockets port
I've started using net/Socket, which is at version (1.8.7) and found a serious bug wrt OpenSSL (even when not using it). I've now switched to net/Socket-devel, which is at 1.9.9, and this bug is solved. However, from the master site, I see this libray is now at 2.1.7. Any plan to import it? bye & Thanks av. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Keeping ports and packages synchronized
Hi everyone, I'm trying to find a way to keep the ports tree synchronized with the latest packages in order to minimize version mismatches and to allow easy mixing between them. So far I've been using a hack that does a listing of the packages-6-stable directory on the freebsd ftp, and uses the mtime of the most recent file (excluding CHECKSUM.MD5) for doing a csup checkout. Unfortunately, this seems to work seldomly. Is anyone aware of a better way to accomplish this? Thank you Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story. Play Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games. http://sims.yahoo.com/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Eclipse Aptana (Was Re: eclipse 3.3.0)
On Sunday 22 July 2007 06:35:55 Norberto Meijome wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 11:44:22 -0700
>
> David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am running Version: 3.2.2 with aptana mainly for Ruby, Ruby on Rails
> > and Ajax on Rails programming and it is working fine
>
> Hi David,
> I took a look @ Aptana a few days ago and I am wondering whether it (the
> Eclipse plugin Download ) provides anything other than the Ruby Development
> tools (RTD) + Web Standard Tools (WST).
>
> I have those tools already installed..and I can't seem to find any gross
> differences just by checking the screenshots in their site.
>
> thanks, and apologies for the change of topic in the middle of the thread.
> B
>
> _
> {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
>
Yes Aptana provides full support for rails developments and integrates really
well with subversion. If you use Ruby on Rails and Ajax on Rails as part of
Ruby development tools I would recomend Aptana without hesitation. IMHO I do
not feel there is a stonger or more fully feature IDE for an IDE.
The Aptana/subversion installation takes a little bit of hassle but I feel it
is well worth while.
David
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
INDEX now builds successfully on 5.x
___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Eclipse Aptana (Was Re: eclipse 3.3.0)
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 11:44:22 -0700
David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am running Version: 3.2.2 with aptana mainly for Ruby, Ruby on Rails and
> Ajax on Rails programming and it is working fine
Hi David,
I took a look @ Aptana a few days ago and I am wondering whether it (the
Eclipse plugin Download ) provides anything other than the Ruby Development
tools (RTD) + Web Standard Tools (WST).
I have those tools already installed..and I can't seem to find any gross
differences just by checking the screenshots in their site.
thanks, and apologies for the change of topic in the middle of the thread.
B
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind
who gets the credit."
Robert Woodruff
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet.
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been
Warned.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: geography category adoption
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 12:57:07AM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Virtual category "geography" was created some time ago. Is anybody > willing to scan the tree and add some ports to that category? ports/64304 is marked as suspended. Mark it as open, throw it back in the pool and let the sharks feast on it! Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis |Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]| Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: geography category adoption
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 00:57:07 +0200
Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Virtual category "geography" was created some time ago. Is anybody
> willing to scan the tree and add some ports to that category?
Hi Pav,
where can I find some description of what is expected to be found in this
'geography' category?
if anything related to geo
net/GeoIP makes sense in net and also in geography (relates to matching IP to
country)
only related to GIS ?
thx :)
B
_
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
There are no stupid questions, but there are a LOT of inquisitive idiots.
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet.
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been
Warned.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
INDEX build failed for 5.x
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-5 - please wait..pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found Done. make_index: htdig-3.2.0.b6_2: no entry for /usr/ports Committers on the hook: barner clement pav sobomax vd Most recent CVS update was: U dns/maradns/Makefile U mail/fetchmail/Makefile U mail/fetchmail/files/fetchmail.in U www/newsbeuter/Makefile U www/rsstail/Makefile ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: emacs upgrade question
On 2007-Jul-21 10:34:36 -0700, Brian Gruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Now I'm ready to upgrade to emacs 22. What's the >correct procedure for this? I'm guessing perhaps it's >to set the var in make.conf to emacs22 and then do >'portupgrade -fr emacs'. You no longer have 'emacs' installed. I would suggest removing 'EMACS_PORT_NAME' (which defaults to emacs22 and causes problems with some ports if set) and using: # portupgrade -f -o editors/emacs emacs21 -- Peter Jeremy pgprQ6WpkbjoN.pgp Description: PGP signature
INDEX build failed for 5.x
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-5 - please wait..pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found Done. make_index: htdig-3.2.0.b6_2: no entry for /usr/ports Committers on the hook: clement sobomax vd Most recent CVS update was: U Mk/bsd.apache.mk U misc/libpri/Makefile U misc/libpri/distinfo U misc/libpri/files/patch-Makefile U misc/ossp-uuid/Makefile U misc/ossp-uuid/distinfo U misc/zaptel/Makefile U misc/zaptel/files/patch-ztcfg::Makefile U net/asterisk/Makefile U net/asterisk/distinfo U net/asterisk/pkg-plist U net/asterisk/files/asterisk.sh.in U net/asterisk/files/patch-Makefile U net/asterisk/files/patch-configure U www/apache22/Makefile U www/apache22/pkg-plist U www/apache22/files/htcacheclean.sh.in U www/apache22/files/patch-support:Makefile.in ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: TeXLive for Net/FreeBSD
Hi, On 21/07/07, Nikola Lecic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If the base (your texmf-minimal) remains unchanged (as it was at the time of TL2007 release) -- it will maybe need some patches for the files outside xetexdir/, but nothing too difficult. XeTeX also requires texmf-full. So this means that no massive complications must occur. What do you think? In theory. However this is the theory I had when I started out porting texlive. It took a whole lot longer than I thought. But then I didn't have any BSD documentation, so I had to work out the wrong ways to do things myself :P -- Best Regards Edd --- http://students.dec.bournemouth.ac.uk/ebarrett ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Unusual sudo / w behaviour - 0 users?
On 7/22/07, Paul Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Tom (and ports list by CC), After an upgrade to sudo v1.6.9 on my 6-STABLE workstation, I've noticed some interesting behaviour with regards to interaction between sudo and w. Sorry to respond so shortly afterwards (especially to myself!), but I've also confirmed this behaviour on a FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p6 box with sudo v1.6.9. Quite an interesting little bug with potentially dangerous implications, since a user could hide from the "real" administrator if (s)he were to compromise the box and at least temporarily escalate themselves. -- Regards, Paul Fraser // Independent Technical Consultant // Ph: +61 405 341 905 // furyc0de.net This correspondence and any related attachments are confidential. Distribution, reproduction, or release (public domain or otherwise) without the author's prior written consent is STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. Failure to distribute any of the aforementioned without this footer (intact and unmodified) is also STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. Failure to abide by these terms and conditions can result in legal action. If you have received this correspondance in error, or believe any of these terms have been breached, you are requested to contact the author immediately and take steps to destroy all copies in your possession. PGP KeyID: 0x64E635B1 Keyserver: pgp.mit.edu:11371 Key fingerprint: CDA3 0797 68B9 0EC1 D4D3 A7B9 D7D7 4924 64E6 35B1 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Unusual sudo / w behaviour - 0 users?
Hi Tom (and ports list by CC), After an upgrade to sudo v1.6.9 on my 6-STABLE workstation, I've noticed some interesting behaviour with regards to interaction between sudo and w. Check the output below for an example. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ sudo -V Sudo version 1.6.9 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ w 7:42PM up 8 days, 7:46, 1 user, load averages: 0.11, 0.10, 0.15 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT pfraser p0 core-server01 7:38PM - w [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ sudo -s Last login: Sun Jul 22 19:36:22 on ttyp1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# w 7:42PM up 8 days, 7:46, 0 users, load averages: 0.10, 0.09, 0.15 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# Note there is now no active session listed? If I then drop out of the sudo session, the problem persists. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# exit exit [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ w 7:44PM up 8 days, 7:47, 0 users, load averages: 0.27, 0.15, 0.17 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ I'm afraid I'm not familiar enough with the inner workings of all the related systems and can't be of much more assistance (at least initially), but I'm quite welcome to perform any testing you require. You may just need to hold my hand a little bit! -- Regards, Paul Fraser // Independent Technical Consultant // Ph: +61 405 341 905 // furyc0de.net This correspondence and any related attachments are confidential. Distribution, reproduction, or release (public domain or otherwise) without the author's prior written consent is STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. Failure to distribute any of the aforementioned without this footer (intact and unmodified) is also STRICTLY FORBIDDEN. Failure to abide by these terms and conditions can result in legal action. If you have received this correspondance in error, or believe any of these terms have been breached, you are requested to contact the author immediately and take steps to destroy all copies in your possession. PGP KeyID: 0x64E635B1 Keyserver: pgp.mit.edu:11371 Key fingerprint: CDA3 0797 68B9 0EC1 D4D3 A7B9 D7D7 4924 64E6 35B1 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
