On Friday 17 April 2009 14:09:51 Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Oleg Ginzburg wrote:
> > And i forget to say for one else problem with {archivers,mis}/deco:
> > both of them produced one binary file in /usr/local/bin/deco.
> >
> > cd /usr/ports/archivers/deco
> > make install
> > ...
> > (i have deco archivers)
> > pkg_add -r deco
> >
> > (deco/NC-clone replace /usr/local/bin/deco)
> >
> > pkg_which /usr/local/bin/deco
> > [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 718 packages
> > found (-1 +1) (...). done]
> > deco-3.9_4 deco-1.6
> >
> > pkg_delete -f deco-3.9\*
>
> Can you open a PR for this problem? I think it is really bad. If two
> ports are installing same files, then there must be set CONFLICTS in
> Makefile.
Ok.
>
> The next thing is that I think there should not be the two ports with
> the same name.
IMHO, soon or later, problems like that will be surface is frequency . More
so, a package numbers is increase day by day. May be location like
/usr/local/bin/* most certainly controlling by some stuff through
analyzing/scanning pkg-plist files for stop potential collision?
>
> Miroslav Lachman
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
