npviewer and ELF binary type 0 not known

[David Demelier]

Hello,

I had a power failure and a lot of fsck issues after. I don't know if my 
system is having corrupt files but I can't use flash player anymore :


markand@Groseille ~ $ nspluginwrapper -v -a -i
Auto-install plugins from /home/markand/.mozilla/plugins
Looking for plugins in /home/markand/.mozilla/plugins
ELF binary type "0" not known.
/usr/local/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin: 1: Syntax error: 
"(" unexpected


markand@Groseille ~ $ nspluginwrapper -v -i 
/usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-f10-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so

ELF binary type "0" not known.
/usr/local/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin: 1: Syntax error: 
"(" unexpected
nspluginwrapper: no appropriate viewer found for 
/usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-f10-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so


Even reinstalling nspluginwrapper or linux-10-flashplugin does not solve ..

Cheers,

--
David Demelier
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

how to tune the system for the heavy traffic?

[李森]

hi all:
 my freebsd is  7.3-RELEASE FreeBSD.
 i fount it lose packages slightly,

ping test:
23 packets transmitted, 22 packets received, 4.3% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.073/0.521/1.952/0.521 ms

  netstat 1:

   there is a lot of input error in netstat 1 result:

% netstat 1
input(Total)   output
   packets  errs  bytespackets  errs  bytes colls
 27839  33361807953  31722 06226471 0
 29596  21221903013  34289 06729220 0
 24747  22511600582  17843 03094079 0
 15358 01004995  15942 03810051 0
  4743 0 337459  11260 02147868 0
  9534 0 629656   3890 0 411055 0
 15024 01019820  22629 09454034 0
 25099   1911654160  22364 05319211 0
 13175   358 874315  18197 06062716 0
 25506  17851651455  33867 0   10503736 0
 33319  30292137120  31391 06423544 0
 29830   5971915300  33235 06198883 0


My question is how to tune the system for the heave traffic?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: f77 in FreeBSD 8.2

[Mehmet Erol Sanliturk]

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Eduardo Viruena Silva <
eduardo.viru...@esfm.ipn.mx> wrote:

> On Tue, April 5, 2011 7:44 pm, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Eduardo Viruena Silva <
> > eduardo.viru...@esfm.ipn.mx> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Hello, FreeBSD gurus,
> >>
> >> I have noticed that the Fortran Compiler f77 that used to be
> >> in freebsd sources is not longer there in version 8.2-stable,
> >> now it's in the obsolete software list.
> >>
> >> Nevertheless, it has some directories in the sources:
> >>
> >> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f77
> >> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f77/Makefile
> >> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f771
> >> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f771/Makefile
> >> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f77doc
> >> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f77doc/Makefile
> >>
> >>
> >> How can I install that compiler?
> >>
> >> The one in the ports does not work as fine as the the one in
> >> the sources.
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks in advace,
> >>
> >> Eduardo.
> >>
> >> PS. Please answer to my e-mail address, I'm not subscribed to
> >> the list.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > My answer is NOT related directly to your question , please forgive me .
> >
> >
> > I am using G95 ( from www.g95.org which is in the packages of FreeBSD )
> in
> > Windows and Linux , and I like it very much because it generates very
> good
> > code , especially if the stack traces are enabled in command line , on
> run
> > time errors it is giving nearly exact source line of the error point with
> > a
> > list of called subroutines chain  . Since the G95 is generated from the
> > same
> > sources for the FreeBSD , I think there is no difference between platform
> > related compilers .
> >
> > Another point is ( if your source files have .FOR extension , it is using
> > Fortran 77 , if it is .F90 , it is using the Fortran 95 ( be careful
> about
> > cases of letters ) . For such points , please read its manual . If any
> > Fortran 77 source file has .F90 extension , it will produce a lot of
> > errors
> > because Fortran 77 is fixed line format based , Fortran 90 or 95 is free
> > line format based .
> >
> > Thank you very much .
> >
> >
> > Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
> >
>
> Thanks Mehmet.
>
> I'd better start promoting the use of g95.
>
> Some people in the list say that f77 users must move on in their lives
> and leave f77 behind.
>
>
> 
>
> Something curious is happening, g95 does not seem to find its library
> libg95.
>
> I have to write explicitly:
>
>g95 foo.for -o foo  -L/usr/local/lib
>
> to compile the program foo.
>
> /etc/rc.d/ldconfig restart does not fix the problem.
> Any ideas?
>
>
> Thanks for answering,
>
> Eduardo.
>
>


The command line is important for g95 . Therefore , please write a complete
command line for compilation . Since these are multi-platform software AND
different platforms are NOT equivalent in their directory structure , I
think , these facts are not very important points .


My approach is to use a batch file in Windows and a shell script in Linux to
compile programs  :

For example : g95-cte.sh ( cte : compile to executable , there is another
cts : compile to syntax  )


g95 -ftrace=full -o $1 $1.FOR


( -ftrace=full means , generate code to produce call chain trace on run-time
error . )
To compile  a program , use it as follows ( use your extension as it is :
.for or .FOR , FreeBSD is case-sensitive ) :


g95-cte.sh hello


Move g95-cte.sh after making it executable into a directory which it is in
the $PATH , then it will be possible to use g95-cte.sh from any directory .

For specially required directories , add their names into its command line
with suitable prefixes .


In the following page ,
http://www.g95.org/downloads.shtml


there are binaries for FreeBSD . Since they are specific to platforms , they
MAY NOT require specification of libraries , but , again , these are NOT
important , specify them in shell script command line only one time ,
then use it continuously .

Thank you very much .


Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Thunderbird segfaults if UID > 0

[Kevin Kinsey]

Hello,

I've had trouble since upgrading mail/thunderbird from 2.X
to 3.1.9 --- as a non-root user, it segfaults.

As root, I have no issues.

I've tried:

1. Googling
2. "mv .mozilla .mozilla-old && thunderbird"
3.  sudo chmod 777 /dev/null && thunderbird
(and similar stuff with /dev/fd/* and
the symlinks stdin, stdout and stderr.

I'm kind of stumped at this point.  Here's the
last part of a ktrace:

 54137 sh   RET   read 872/0x368
 54137 sh   CALL  stat(0x283034d0,0xbfbfe638)
 54137 sh   NAMI  "/usr/local/lib/thunderbird/run-mozilla.sh"
 54137 sh   STRU  struct stat {dev=87, ino=6053072, mode=-rwxrwxrwx 
, nlink=1, uid=0, gid=0, rdev=24241760, atime=1302052597, 
stime=1301719584, ctime=1302044479, birthtime=1301719584, size=10461, 
blksize=4096, blocks=24, flags=0x0 }
 54137 sh   RET   stat 0
 54137 sh   CALL  eaccess(0x283034d0,X_OK)
 54137 sh   NAMI  "/usr/local/lib/thunderbird/run-mozilla.sh"
 54137 sh   RET   eaccess 0
 54137 sh   CALL  geteuid
 54137 sh   RET   geteuid 1001/0x3e9
 54137 sh   CALL  fork
 54137 sh   RET   fork 54141/0xd37d
 54137 sh   CALL  getpgrp
 54137 sh   RET   getpgrp 54137/0xd379
 54137 sh   CALL  wait4(0x,0xbfbfe778,WUNTRACED,0)
 54137 sh   RET   wait4 54141/0xd37d
 54137 sh   CALL  exit(0x8b)
  

Anyone got a clue what I've done?

Thanks,

Kevin Kinsey
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: remaining goal.. .

[Gary Kline]

On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 07:21:13PM -0400, Daniel Staal wrote:
> --As of April 5, 2011 11:05:19 AM -0700, Gary Kline is alleged to have said:
> 
> > It is a Alix 601 board with 1G of CF flash.  But according to my
> > hardware friend, it will take a CF burner of some kind.
> 
> --As for the rest, it is mine.
> 
> I'm going to assume you mean the Alix 6e1, which is the closest I
> can find in their numbering system.


6E1, yes.  Sorry; it was last December.  My friend was going to drop
by , but cancelled and was back in school before he remembered.

> 
> It's got a standard CF adaptor.  (*All* the Alix's do.)  If there's
> a card in it, pull it off and insert into any CF reader, and it
> should work fine. (USB-based ones typically sell for $20, including
> SD, XD, MMC, Memorystick, and probably a few others as well.  Check
> Best Buy, or your local computer hardware store, or possibly a
> camera store.)  Then follow Arthur's advice. The CF card may be a
> little awkward to pull off.
> 
> If the card that's in there is some special card that needs some
> exotic burner...  When you are at the computer store spend another
> $5 or so and get yourself a new card.
> 


I asked the pfSense forum if I had enough memory and they said
yes.  Wghat I've got should be fine assuming that everything is
put together correctly.  My physical disabilities limit what i
can do myself--that's the catch; it is why I have to ask favors.

I'll save your mail just in case my friend gets off-track for
some reason.  Shouldn't.  It is how he is putting himself thru
college this time.  ---What I want is to be drawing as few watts
as _possible_.  Especially since I have two tower cases going
24*7.  Plus the firewall Beast.  :: be nice to get down to some
min footprint and get that much further into the green-zone!

-g


> Daniel T. Staal
> 
> ---
> This email copyright the author.  Unless otherwise noted, you
> are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use
> the contents for non-commercial purposes.  This copyright will
> expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years,
> whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of
> local copyright law.
> ---

-- 
 Gary Kline  kl...@thought.org  http://www.thought.org  Public Service Unix
   Journey Toward the Dawn, E-Book: http://www.thought.org
  The 7.98a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: f77 in FreeBSD 8.2

[Eduardo Viruena Silva]

On Tue, April 5, 2011 7:44 pm, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Eduardo Viruena Silva <
> eduardo.viru...@esfm.ipn.mx> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello, FreeBSD gurus,
>>
>> I have noticed that the Fortran Compiler f77 that used to be
>> in freebsd sources is not longer there in version 8.2-stable,
>> now it's in the obsolete software list.
>>
>> Nevertheless, it has some directories in the sources:
>>
>> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f77
>> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f77/Makefile
>> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f771
>> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f771/Makefile
>> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f77doc
>> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f77doc/Makefile
>>
>>
>> How can I install that compiler?
>>
>> The one in the ports does not work as fine as the the one in
>> the sources.
>>
>>
>> Thanks in advace,
>>
>> Eduardo.
>>
>> PS. Please answer to my e-mail address, I'm not subscribed to
>> the list.
>>
>>
>>
>
> My answer is NOT related directly to your question , please forgive me .
>
>
> I am using G95 ( from www.g95.org which is in the packages of FreeBSD ) in
> Windows and Linux , and I like it very much because it generates very good
> code , especially if the stack traces are enabled in command line , on run
> time errors it is giving nearly exact source line of the error point with
> a
> list of called subroutines chain  . Since the G95 is generated from the
> same
> sources for the FreeBSD , I think there is no difference between platform
> related compilers .
>
> Another point is ( if your source files have .FOR extension , it is using
> Fortran 77 , if it is .F90 , it is using the Fortran 95 ( be careful about
> cases of letters ) . For such points , please read its manual . If any
> Fortran 77 source file has .F90 extension , it will produce a lot of
> errors
> because Fortran 77 is fixed line format based , Fortran 90 or 95 is free
> line format based .
>
> Thank you very much .
>
>
> Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
>

Thanks Mehmet.

I'd better start promoting the use of g95.

Some people in the list say that f77 users must move on in their lives
and leave f77 behind.




Something curious is happening, g95 does not seem to find its library
libg95.

I have to write explicitly:

g95 foo.for -o foo  -L/usr/local/lib

to compile the program foo.

/etc/rc.d/ldconfig restart does not fix the problem.
Any ideas?


Thanks for answering,

 Eduardo.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: f77 in FreeBSD 8.2

[Mehmet Erol Sanliturk]

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Eduardo Viruena Silva <
eduardo.viru...@esfm.ipn.mx> wrote:

>
> Hello, FreeBSD gurus,
>
> I have noticed that the Fortran Compiler f77 that used to be
> in freebsd sources is not longer there in version 8.2-stable,
> now it's in the obsolete software list.
>
> Nevertheless, it has some directories in the sources:
>
> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f77
> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f77/Makefile
> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f771
> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f771/Makefile
> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f77doc
> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f77doc/Makefile
>
>
> How can I install that compiler?
>
> The one in the ports does not work as fine as the the one in
> the sources.
>
>
> Thanks in advace,
>
> Eduardo.
>
> PS. Please answer to my e-mail address, I'm not subscribed to
> the list.
>
>
>

My answer is NOT related directly to your question , please forgive me .


I am using G95 ( from www.g95.org which is in the packages of FreeBSD ) in
Windows and Linux , and I like it very much because it generates very good
code , especially if the stack traces are enabled in command line , on run
time errors it is giving nearly exact source line of the error point with a
list of called subroutines chain  . Since the G95 is generated from the same
sources for the FreeBSD , I think there is no difference between platform
related compilers .

Another point is ( if your source files have .FOR extension , it is using
Fortran 77 , if it is .F90 , it is using the Fortran 95 ( be careful about
cases of letters ) . For such points , please read its manual . If any
Fortran 77 source file has .F90 extension , it will produce a lot of errors
because Fortran 77 is fixed line format based , Fortran 90 or 95 is free
line format based .

Thank you very much .


Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

f77 in FreeBSD 8.2

[Eduardo Viruena Silva]

Hello, FreeBSD gurus,

I have noticed that the Fortran Compiler f77 that used to be
in freebsd sources is not longer there in version 8.2-stable,
now it's in the obsolete software list.

Nevertheless, it has some directories in the sources:

/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f77
/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f77/Makefile
/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f771
/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f771/Makefile
/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f77doc
/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f77doc/Makefile


How can I install that compiler?

The one in the ports does not work as fine as the the one in
the sources.


Thanks in advace,

 Eduardo.

PS. Please answer to my e-mail address, I'm not subscribed to
the list.


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: remaining goal.. .

[Daniel Staal]

--As of April 5, 2011 11:05:19 AM -0700, Gary Kline is alleged to have said:


It is a Alix 601 board with 1G of CF flash.  But according to my
hardware friend, it will take a CF burner of some kind.


--As for the rest, it is mine.

I'm going to assume you mean the Alix 6e1, which is the closest I can find 
in their numbering system.


It's got a standard CF adaptor.  (*All* the Alix's do.)  If there's a card 
in it, pull it off and insert into any CF reader, and it should work fine. 
(USB-based ones typically sell for $20, including SD, XD, MMC, Memorystick, 
and probably a few others as well.  Check Best Buy, or your local computer 
hardware store, or possibly a camera store.)  Then follow Arthur's advice. 
The CF card may be a little awkward to pull off.


If the card that's in there is some special card that needs some exotic 
burner...  When you are at the computer store spend another $5 or so and 
get yourself a new card.


Daniel T. Staal

---
This email copyright the author.  Unless otherwise noted, you
are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use
the contents for non-commercial purposes.  This copyright will
expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years,
whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of
local copyright law.
---
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Mentioning of geom in the handbook's RAID chapter.

[Michael Powell]

Leon Meßner wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I recently searched google for "FreeBSD software raid" because i wanted
> to compare the advice google gives me for creating a software raid in
> linux and freebsd. First hit here was the link to the handbook page
> (18.4). This page still is only talking about ccd and vinum. I know
> there is a whole chapter about geom but why is there no mentioning about
> that in the Storage.RAID part of the Handbook ?
> 

This is mostly pure conjecture on my part, but I think it is most likely a 
separation between "old" and "new". The Handbook is maintained and 
contributed to in an ad-hoc manner over long periods of time by  ever 
changing volunteers and I think there is a conservative approach to 
reorganizing or changing something someone else had contributed previously.  
The volunteer who wrote the GEOM chapter simply may not wish to alter what 
someone else contributed.

Although not perfect, I still think the Handbook is one of the best examples 
of documentation around.

-Mike



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Mentioning of geom in the handbook's RAID chapter.

[Leon Meßner]

Hi,

I recently searched google for "FreeBSD software raid" because i wanted
to compare the advice google gives me for creating a software raid in
linux and freebsd. First hit here was the link to the handbook page
(18.4). This page still is only talking about ccd and vinum. I know
there is a whole chapter about geom but why is there no mentioning about
that in the Storage.RAID part of the Handbook ?

Sincerly,
Leon
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Help with pam_abl package

[Dimitri Yioulos]

On Tuesday 05 April 2011 12:22:54 pm Phusion 
wrote:
> I'm having a problem with the pam_abl package.
> I've already emailed the programs author, but
> didn't get a reply back. I'm having trouble
> setting up a rule to exclude to users. One user
> is the root user while the other is a local
> account. I've tried multiple things, but they
> don't seem to work. The rules seem to only not
> include the root user.
>
> This does exclude the root user, but not the
> localacct user.
>
> #debug
> user_db=/var/db/pam_abl/users.db
> user_rule=!root|!localacct:5/60d
>
> This next one doesn't seem to work either.
>
> #debug
> user_db=/var/db/pam_abl/users.db
> user_rule=!root:5/60d !localacct:5/60d
>
> Please advise.
>
> Phusion
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freeb
>sd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


You might want to try the following (from the 
pam_abl documentation):


Multiple rules can be provided separated by spaces 
like this

*:10/1h root:5/1h,10/1d

in which case all rules that match a particular 
user and service will be checked. The user or 
host will be blocked if any of the rule triggers 
matches. The sense of the user matching can be 
inverted by placing a '!' in front of the rule so 
that

!root:20/1d

is a rule which would match for all users apart 
from root. It is important to treat root as a 
special case in the user_rule otherwise excessive 
attempts to authenticate as root will result in 
the root account being locked out even for valid 
holders of root credentials.


HTH.

Dimitri

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

RaLink RT2760 + RT2720

[Dan Gavin]

Hello,

I have purchased this wireless card:

http://www.monoprice.com/products/product.asp?c_id=105&cp_id=10501&cs_id=1050103&p_id=5338&seq=1&format=3#specification

It seems that it is not being detected by 8.2-RELEASE.

I have tried the RT2870 and RT2860 drivers with the card from:

http://repo.or.cz/w/ralink_drivers.git

This has resulted in little success.  Here is a snippet of  pciconf -lvcb:

none2@pci0:3:1:0:   class=0x028000 card=0x30621814 chip=0x30621814 
rev=0x00 hdr=0x00

vendor = 'Ralink Technology, Corp.'
class  = network
bar   [10] = type Memory, range 32, base 0xe200, size 65536, 
enabled

cap 01[40] = powerspec 3  supports D0 D3  current D0

If anyone could be of assistance it would be greatly appreciated.  My 
ultimate goal is to use this as an AP.


Thanks,

Dan
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Fuse > 2.7.4?

[Joe Auty]

Hello,

What is the status of the fusefs-libs port? I'd like to try the newer
s3fs builds with FUSE, but they require 2.8.4 or higher. I was unable to
get FUSE 2.8.5 to build with the current patches included in the port.
Are these patches still necessary?


-- 
Joe Auty, NetMusician
NetMusician helps musicians, bands and artists create beautiful,
professional, custom designed, career-essential websites that are easy
to maintain and to integrate with popular social networks.
www.netmusician.org 
j...@netmusician.org 

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Place to install library of shell functions

[Chris Rees]

2011/4/5 Jerry McAllister :
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 05:23:47PM +0200, Michael Grünewald wrote:
>
>> Dear FreeBSD users,
>>
>>
>> today I come to you with what seems to be somehow pedantic question:
>> where is the best place to install libraries of shell functions.
>>
>> I read hier(4) carefully and it seems the correct place for this would
>> be somewhere under `/usr/local/share':
>>
>>                 share/    architecture-independent files
>
> I would go with /usr/local/lib.
>

I'd rather agree with the OP; shell functions are arch-independent,
and are DATADIR suited IMO.

Chris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: remaining goal.. .

[Gary Kline]

On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 11:42:33AM +0100, Arthur Chance wrote:
> On 04/05/11 00:39, Gary Kline wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 03:39:19PM -0700, David Brodbeck wrote:
> >>On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Gary Kline  wrote:
> >>>simply that i'm looking for somebody  who know how to transfer 
> >>> pfsense
> >>>from a standalone system to this kit.
> >>
> >>I would suggest using Diagnostics/Backup/restore on the current system
> >>to save a copy of the configuration in a .xml file.
> >
> > Done.  in fact i have two copies.
> >
> >>Then install pfSense on the new machine by whatever means are
> >>available -- I think the current two options are bootable CD-R and
> >>bootable USB stick, but there may be others for embedded systems  --
> >>I'm not familiar with those.
> >
> >
> > That is axactly my problem.  This is a tiny 4watt kit type
> > deal, all solid state with with memory that requires some
> > special kind of burner.  [I have the latest pfSense tarball
> > and my .xml restore/update file.  ... so, software side, i'm
> > all set.]
> 
> I use pfSense, but my system (based on an Alix 2D3 board) has a
> compact flash drive, so I simply dd the disk image onto the CF card
> on my normal FBSD box, and plug it into the Alix, which is the usual
> way of deploying embedded pfSense. What hardware are you using? Does
> it have any CF or SD card capability, or maybe a USB port?


It is a Alix 601 board with 1G of CF flash.  But according to my
hardware friend, it will take a CF burner of some kind.  I'm
sure the kit has the right ports and I have the right sized
pfSense image  for me , it's messing with plugging things
together and figuring out which cables go where.  That's where
i'm in the dark. ...be nice if i could do without theis
"burner"... 
> 

-- 
 Gary Kline  kl...@thought.org  http://www.thought.org  Public Service Unix
   Journey Toward the Dawn, E-Book: http://www.thought.org
  The 7.98a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Place to install library of shell functions

[Jerry]

On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 12:09:40 -0400
mikel king  articulated:

> For the bash library (http://jafdip.com/?p=537) we
> choose /usr/local/lib. This just seems to be the most logical place
> for this sort of thing.

Interestingly enough, WOT gives that URL a poor rating.

http://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/jafdip.com

-- 
Jerry ✌
freebsd.u...@seibercom.net

Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Help with pam_abl package

[Phusion]

I'm having a problem with the pam_abl package. I've already emailed
the programs author, but didn't get a reply back. I'm having trouble
setting up a rule to exclude to users. One user is the root user while
the other is a local account. I've tried multiple things, but they
don't seem to work. The rules seem to only not include the root user.

This does exclude the root user, but not the localacct user.

#debug
user_db=/var/db/pam_abl/users.db
user_rule=!root|!localacct:5/60d

This next one doesn't seem to work either.

#debug
user_db=/var/db/pam_abl/users.db
user_rule=!root:5/60d !localacct:5/60d

Please advise.

Phusion
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Place to install library of shell functions

[mikel king]

On Apr 5, 2011, at 11:23 AM, Michael Grünewald wrote:

> Dear FreeBSD users,
> 
> 
> today I come to you with what seems to be somehow pedantic question:  where 
> is the best place to install libraries of shell functions.
> 
> I read hier(4) carefully and it seems the correct place for this would be 
> somewhere under `/usr/local/share':
> 
>share/architecture-independent files
> 
> 
> On the base systems, many macros (make templates and groff macros) are 
> actually installed under /usr/share.  However, the only library of shell 
> functions I am aware of is `/etc/rc.subr', that landed on this funny 
> location, probably to be pretty sure that this library is on the same 
> filesystem as the scripts under /etc/rc.d.
> 
> Several of the ports install shell scripts under `/usr/local/lib' that 
> hier(4) devotes to  ``shared and archive ar(1)-type libraries''.  These shell 
> scripts are:
> 
> > find /usr/local/lib -name '*.sh'
> /usr/local/lib/tk8.5/tkConfig.sh
> /usr/local/lib/seamonkey/run-mozilla.sh
> /usr/local/lib/libxul/run-mozilla.sh
> /usr/local/lib/rpm/convertrpmrc.sh
> /usr/local/lib/rpm/find-lang.sh
> /usr/local/lib/rpm/getpo.sh
> /usr/local/lib/rpm/u_pkg.sh
> /usr/local/lib/rpm/vpkg-provides.sh
> /usr/local/lib/rpm/vpkg-provides2.sh
> /usr/local/lib/firefox/run-mozilla.sh
> /usr/local/lib/tcl8.5/tclConfig.sh
> /usr/local/lib/thunderbird/run-mozilla.sh
> /usr/local/lib/llvm-gcc-2.8/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd8.2/4.2.1/install-tools/fixinc.sh
> 
> Two files (the `/usr/local/lib/tcl8.5/tclConfig.sh' one and the `s/tcl/tk/g' 
> one) are actually shell script libraries (defining a bunch of variables), and 
> all the others are ancillary scripts, that would maybe better fit in 
> `/usr/local/libexec'.
> 
> So, practical experience does not really second my a priori that these files 
> sould go under the `share' hierarchy and I would like to have your opinion on 
> this question.
> -- 
> Best Regards,
> Michael

For the bash library (http://jafdip.com/?p=537) we choose /usr/local/lib. This 
just seems to be the most logical place for this sort of thing.

Regards,
Mikel King
BSD News Network
http://bsdnews.net
skype: mikel.king
http://twitter.com/mikelking



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Place to install library of shell functions

[Dan Nelson]

In the last episode (Apr 05), Michael Grünewald said:
> today I come to you with what seems to be somehow pedantic question: where
> is the best place to install libraries of shell functions.
> 
> I read hier(4) carefully and it seems the correct place for this would 
> be somewhere under `/usr/local/share':
> 
>  share/architecture-independent files
> 
> On the base systems, many macros (make templates and groff macros) are
> actually installed under /usr/share.  However, the only library of shell
> functions I am aware of is `/etc/rc.subr', that landed on this funny
> location, probably to be pretty sure that this library is on the same
> filesystem as the scripts under /etc/rc.d.
>
> Several of the ports install shell scripts under `/usr/local/lib' that
> hier(4) devotes to ``shared and archive ar(1)-type libraries''.  These
> shell scripts are:

The zsh port installs all its helper scripts and functions into
/usr/local/share/zsh , and the portupgrade and portmaster ports insert their
zsh autocompletion functions into /usr/local/share/zsh/site-functions. 
Seems to work great.  Ports that install scripts into /usr/local/lib
probably either don't have separate script and lib install paths in their
makefile (tcl probably), or their scripts aren't meant to be called directly
(firefox).

-- 
Dan Nelson
dnel...@allantgroup.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Place to install library of shell functions

[Polytropon]

On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:23:47 +0200, Michael Grünewald 
 wrote:
> Dear FreeBSD users,
> 
> 
> today I come to you with what seems to be somehow pedantic question:  
> where is the best place to install libraries of shell functions.

Depends. Are you interested in shell functions you install
from a port / package, or your own shell functions?



> I read hier(4) carefully and it seems the correct place for this would 
> be somewhere under `/usr/local/share':
> 
>  share/architecture-independent files

This structure usually serves the purpose of /usr/share,
but for software installed by ports or packages, as the
/usr/local/ subtree "duplicates" the system's structures
in many cases.



> On the base systems, many macros (make templates and groff macros) are 
> actually installed under /usr/share.  However, the only library of shell 
> functions I am aware of is `/etc/rc.subr', that landed on this funny 
> location, probably to be pretty sure that this library is on the same 
> filesystem as the scripts under /etc/rc.d.

I guess that's the intention behind this decision. You'll
see that many things on FreeBSD are determined by a well-
intended thought, rather than an arbitrary "Oh, why don't
we just put it ... *throw a dice* ... here?"



> Several of the ports install shell scripts under `/usr/local/lib' that 
> hier(4) devotes to  ``shared and archive ar(1)-type libraries''.  These 
> shell scripts are:
> 
>  > find /usr/local/lib -name '*.sh'
> /usr/local/lib/tk8.5/tkConfig.sh
> /usr/local/lib/seamonkey/run-mozilla.sh
> /usr/local/lib/libxul/run-mozilla.sh
> /usr/local/lib/rpm/convertrpmrc.sh
> /usr/local/lib/rpm/find-lang.sh
> /usr/local/lib/rpm/getpo.sh
> /usr/local/lib/rpm/u_pkg.sh
> /usr/local/lib/rpm/vpkg-provides.sh
> /usr/local/lib/rpm/vpkg-provides2.sh
> /usr/local/lib/firefox/run-mozilla.sh
> /usr/local/lib/tcl8.5/tclConfig.sh
> /usr/local/lib/thunderbird/run-mozilla.sh
> /usr/local/lib/llvm-gcc-2.8/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd8.2/4.2.1/install-tools/fixinc.sh
> 
> Two files (the `/usr/local/lib/tcl8.5/tclConfig.sh' one and the 
> `s/tcl/tk/g' one) are actually shell script libraries (defining a bunch 
> of variables), and all the others are ancillary scripts, that would 
> maybe better fit in `/usr/local/libexec'.

It depends on where the respective port maintainer want to
have them.



> So, practical experience does not really second my a priori that these 
> files sould go under the `share' hierarchy and I would like to have your 
> opinion on this question.

Many software is ported from Linux, so their structures,
or sometimes the lack of, is applied.

For example, I put _my_ stuff that is NOT managed by ports and
definitely does NOT belong to the system into an /opt subtree,
a Solaris-ism I'm "abusing": /opt/bin is in $PATH, so anything
system-wide executable is located there, and /opt/share
does contain non-executable shell scripts (e. g. those with
helper functionalities) or files with settings (that are
sourced by something else) - things that usually are not
called directly.




-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Place to install library of shell functions

[Jerry McAllister]

On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 05:23:47PM +0200, Michael Grünewald wrote:

> Dear FreeBSD users,
> 
> 
> today I come to you with what seems to be somehow pedantic question:  
> where is the best place to install libraries of shell functions.
> 
> I read hier(4) carefully and it seems the correct place for this would 
> be somewhere under `/usr/local/share':
> 
> share/architecture-independent files

I would go with /usr/local/lib.

jerry


> 
> On the base systems, many macros (make templates and groff macros) are 
> actually installed under /usr/share.  However, the only library of shell 
> functions I am aware of is `/etc/rc.subr', that landed on this funny 
> location, probably to be pretty sure that this library is on the same 
> filesystem as the scripts under /etc/rc.d.
> 
> Several of the ports install shell scripts under `/usr/local/lib' that 
> hier(4) devotes to  ``shared and archive ar(1)-type libraries''.  These 
> shell scripts are:
> 
> > find /usr/local/lib -name '*.sh'
> /usr/local/lib/tk8.5/tkConfig.sh
> /usr/local/lib/seamonkey/run-mozilla.sh
> /usr/local/lib/libxul/run-mozilla.sh
> /usr/local/lib/rpm/convertrpmrc.sh
> /usr/local/lib/rpm/find-lang.sh
> /usr/local/lib/rpm/getpo.sh
> /usr/local/lib/rpm/u_pkg.sh
> /usr/local/lib/rpm/vpkg-provides.sh
> /usr/local/lib/rpm/vpkg-provides2.sh
> /usr/local/lib/firefox/run-mozilla.sh
> /usr/local/lib/tcl8.5/tclConfig.sh
> /usr/local/lib/thunderbird/run-mozilla.sh
> /usr/local/lib/llvm-gcc-2.8/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd8.2/4.2.1/install-tools/fixinc.sh
> 
> Two files (the `/usr/local/lib/tcl8.5/tclConfig.sh' one and the 
> `s/tcl/tk/g' one) are actually shell script libraries (defining a bunch 
> of variables), and all the others are ancillary scripts, that would 
> maybe better fit in `/usr/local/libexec'.
> 
> So, practical experience does not really second my a priori that these 
> files sould go under the `share' hierarchy and I would like to have your 
> opinion on this question.
> -- 
> Best Regards,
> Michael
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Place to install library of shell functions

[Michael Grünewald]

Dear FreeBSD users,


today I come to you with what seems to be somehow pedantic question:  
where is the best place to install libraries of shell functions.


I read hier(4) carefully and it seems the correct place for this would 
be somewhere under `/usr/local/share':


share/architecture-independent files


On the base systems, many macros (make templates and groff macros) are 
actually installed under /usr/share.  However, the only library of shell 
functions I am aware of is `/etc/rc.subr', that landed on this funny 
location, probably to be pretty sure that this library is on the same 
filesystem as the scripts under /etc/rc.d.


Several of the ports install shell scripts under `/usr/local/lib' that 
hier(4) devotes to  ``shared and archive ar(1)-type libraries''.  These 
shell scripts are:


> find /usr/local/lib -name '*.sh'
/usr/local/lib/tk8.5/tkConfig.sh
/usr/local/lib/seamonkey/run-mozilla.sh
/usr/local/lib/libxul/run-mozilla.sh
/usr/local/lib/rpm/convertrpmrc.sh
/usr/local/lib/rpm/find-lang.sh
/usr/local/lib/rpm/getpo.sh
/usr/local/lib/rpm/u_pkg.sh
/usr/local/lib/rpm/vpkg-provides.sh
/usr/local/lib/rpm/vpkg-provides2.sh
/usr/local/lib/firefox/run-mozilla.sh
/usr/local/lib/tcl8.5/tclConfig.sh
/usr/local/lib/thunderbird/run-mozilla.sh
/usr/local/lib/llvm-gcc-2.8/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd8.2/4.2.1/install-tools/fixinc.sh

Two files (the `/usr/local/lib/tcl8.5/tclConfig.sh' one and the 
`s/tcl/tk/g' one) are actually shell script libraries (defining a bunch 
of variables), and all the others are ancillary scripts, that would 
maybe better fit in `/usr/local/libexec'.


So, practical experience does not really second my a priori that these 
files sould go under the `share' hierarchy and I would like to have your 
opinion on this question.

--
Best Regards,
Michael
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: dhcpd in vmware

[Kevin Wilcox]

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 08:29, xinyou yan  wrote:

> the dhcpd can't start in vmware :
>
> Here is my /usr/local/etc/hpcdd.conf

Is the file named hpcdd.conf or is that a typo?

> subnet 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
> range 192.168.4.129 192.168.4.254;
> option routers 192.168.4.1;
> }

That *should* throw an error due to the netmask. If you're just using
the 192.168.4.129 - 254 addresses I would change it to

subnet 192.168.4.0 netmask 255.255.255.0

Otherwise the netmask of 255.255.255.0 will lead dhcpd to think it
should be offering for 192.168.0.1 - 192.168.0.254.

> when i use  /usr/local/etc/isc-dhcpd start
>
> it shows :
>   Please do not under any circumstances send requests for
>   failed to start dhcpd

Does it give any other errors?

kmw
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

dhcpd in vmware

[xinyou yan]

the dhcpd can't start in vmware :

Here is my /usr/local/etc/hpcdd.conf

option domain-name "ikfb.org";
option domain-name-servers 192.168.4.100;
option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
default-lease-time 3600;
max-lease-time 86400;
ddns-update-style none;

subnet 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
  range 192.168.4.129 192.168.4.254;
  option routers 192.168.4.1;
}

host ikfb3.org{
   hardware ethernet 00:0C:29:1B:E2:82;
   fixed-address 192.168.4.128;
}




ifkb3.org  ikfb4.org   in  one vmware team .
They both connect to lan1 in the team.

when i use  /usr/local/etc/isc-dhcpd start

it shows :
   Please do not under any circumstances send requests for
   failed to start dhcpd


How can i offer the dhcp to the ikfb3.org.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: remaining goal.. .

[Arthur Chance]

On 04/05/11 00:39, Gary Kline wrote:

On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 03:39:19PM -0700, David Brodbeck wrote:

On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Gary Kline  wrote:

simply that i'm looking for somebody  who know how to transfer pfsense
from a standalone system to this kit.


I would suggest using Diagnostics/Backup/restore on the current system
to save a copy of the configuration in a .xml file.


Done.  in fact i have two copies.


Then install pfSense on the new machine by whatever means are
available -- I think the current two options are bootable CD-R and
bootable USB stick, but there may be others for embedded systems  --
I'm not familiar with those.



That is axactly my problem.  This is a tiny 4watt kit type
deal, all solid state with with memory that requires some
special kind of burner.  [I have the latest pfSense tarball
and my .xml restore/update file.  ... so, software side, i'm
all set.]


I use pfSense, but my system (based on an Alix 2D3 board) has a compact 
flash drive, so I simply dd the disk image onto the CF card on my normal 
FBSD box, and plug it into the Alix, which is the usual way of deploying 
embedded pfSense. What hardware are you using? Does it have any CF or SD 
card capability, or maybe a USB port?


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: ipdivert.ko

[Ian Smith]

In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 357, Issue 3, Message: 8
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 00:58:50 +0930 Sebastian Ramadan  wrote:

 > I wish to cause ipdivert.ko to load at boot time. Currently, ipfw.ko loads
 > correctly at boot time with ipfw_load="YES" in /boot/loader.conf, but
 > ipdivert.ko does not load at boot time with ipdivert_load="YES". I'm able to
 > load it using kldload, though. dmesg doesn't seem to be giving any clues as
 > to why ipdivert won't load... What am I doing wrong?
 > 
 > Regards, Sebastian Ramadan.
 > My uname -a, /boot/loader.conf, kldstat and a successful load of ipdivert
 > using kldload after boot time:
 > domU-12-31-39-02-15-3A# uname -a
 > FreeBSD domU-12-31-39-02-15-3A 8.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE #13: Mon Feb
 > 21 20:13:46 UTC 2011
 > r...@chch.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/i386/usr/src/sys/XEN
 > i386
 > domU-12-31-39-02-15-3A# cat /boot/loader.conf
 > ipfw_load="YES"
 > ipdivert_load="YES"
 > domU-12-31-39-02-15-3A# kldstat
 > Id Refs AddressSize Name
 >  18 0xc000 4000 kernel
 >  21 0xc2bb3000 1ext2fs.ko
 >  31 0xc2d1f000 11000ipfw.ko
 >  41 0xc2d3 d000 libalias.ko

Hmm, I'm a bit curious as to why libalias.ko was loaded.  You don't 
have 'firewall_nat_enable="YES"' in rc.conf, do you?

Anyway, loader.conf isn't the way to go for loading ipfw or ipdivert 
(presumably for use by natd?) these days.

Instead you want these in /etc/rc.conf:

ipfw_enable="YES"
natd_enable="YES"

plus any required ipfw_ and natd_ variables (see /etc/defaults/rc.conf)

Then /etc/rc.d/ipfw will load ipfw.ko, and if natd_enable is set, will 
invoke /etc/rc.d/natd, which loads ipdivert.ko at the right time.

 > domU-12-31-39-02-15-3A# uname -a
 > FreeBSD domU-12-31-39-02-15-3A 8.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE #13: Mon Feb
 > 21 20:13:46 UTC 2011
 > r...@chch.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/i386/usr/src/sys/XEN
 > i386
 > domU-12-31-39-02-15-3A# kldload ipdivert
 > domU-12-31-39-02-15-3A# kldstat
 > Id Refs AddressSize Name
 >  1   10 0xc000 4000 kernel
 >  21 0xc2bb3000 1ext2fs.ko
 >  32 0xc2d1f000 11000ipfw.ko
 >  41 0xc2d3 d000 libalias.ko
 >  51 0xc3cc7000 4000 ipdivert.ko
 > 
 > My dmesg:
 > domU-12-31-39-02-15-3A# dmesg
 > Copyright (c) 1992-2011 The FreeBSD Project.
 > Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
 > The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
 > FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation.
 > FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE #13: Mon Feb 21 20:13:46 UTC 2011
 > r...@chch.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/i386/usr/src/sys/XEN i386

[..]

 > start_init: trying /sbin/init
 > ipfw2 (+ipv6) initialized, divert loadable, nat loadable, rule-based
 > forwarding disabled, default to deny, logging disabled
 > ipfw0: bpf attached

There are a number of outstanding PRs regarding module loading by natd 
and (if used) firewall_nat, and the use of these by /etc/rc.firewall.  

If enabling natd in rc.conf instead doesn't fix your issue, write to me 
privately and I'll put you onto some patches - but unless you're also 
(or instead) using kernel NAT (ipfirewall_nat - which needs to load 
libalias.ko) then the above settings should do you.

cheers, Ian
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"