Re: help me please
from Vinicio Santiago Altamirano Mendez : > please can u tell me how to remapping tftp with a remapping file or exist > another form?. > i see that in tftp manual no exist the -m option > how to do remapping on tftp on mac os x 10.6 pleas > thanks. Is this question for FreeBSD or Mac OS X? This emailing list is for FreeBSD, as the email address suggests. Tom ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: UFS Crash and directories now missing
On 05/11/2012 05:18 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: I appreciate the time you put into this. It was no problem at all:-) had fun comparing. Now that I'm free and have more time I went over the 3rd edition table of contents and found a few instances that mentions FreeBSD. In chapter "Adding a Disk" describes the FFS, shows a freebsd fstab example file and teaches how to add a disk in FreeBSD,etc. I Continued glancing at the contents and it appears the rest of the book is pretty much on subjects that apply to all UNIX OS. the fourth edition text has for some reason basically traded FreeBSD for AIX -- which makes little sense to me. I found a site that it kinda shows that this is was happened, AIX replaced FreeBSD:-( mid way through the site shows the 4th edition only focuses on redhat, opensuse, rhel, solaris, HPUX and IBM AIX. http://www.admin.com/ I ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
lots httpd processes with lockf
I recently updated from FreeBSD7 to FreeBSD9. The server runs (and has always run) apache-2.2. When I do a 'top' I see around 30 entries that all look like this: 32016 www 1 200 321M 40744K lockf 1 0:13 0.00% httpd When I do a ps and grep for www, I get back ~62 entries that look like this: www81139 0.0 0.9 324456 36784 ?? I 7:50AM 0:03.49 /usr/local/sbin/httpd -DNOHTTPACCEPT My hardware is; hw.machine: amd64 hw.model: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPUQ9550 @ 2.83GHz hw.ncpu: 4 hw.machine_arch: amd64 Is it normal to see that many httpd process and lockf entries? Or do I have something incorrectly configured. I don't know if this started happening after 9.X, it might have been doing this before. Ron ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
help me please
please can u tell me how to remapping tftp with a remapping file or exist another form?. i see that in tftp manual no exist the -m option how to do remapping on tftp on mac os x 10.6 pleas thanks. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: UFS Crash and directories now missing
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:11:48PM -0700, Edward M wrote: > >So far I think I found a few that may make a difference. > According to the "table of contents" in the 4th edition in the > chapter called "Booting and shuting down it >only shows entries for: red hat, HP-UX, AIX, SUSE,Ubuntu. However > in the third edition, show entries for FreeBSD's Booting and shuting > down process. >And another example is in the 4th edition the chapter called > "Adding new users", only mentions how to add users for: > SUSE, Redhat Solaris HP-UX and AIX. However in the 3rd edition, > explains how to add users on FreeBSD and > how FreeBSD's master.passwd file, login.conf. work,etc The > third edition's chapter called > "Drivers and the kernel" shows how to build a freebsd kernel, > create a BSD config file, tuning the freebsd kernel, add freebsd > device drivers,etc. > I was not able to find those entries in the the 4th editions > "Drivers and the kernel. chapter.the 3rd editions TCP/IP > chapter shows network config for freebsd. >However in the table of contents of the 4th edition does not. > I'm searching for a website that contains the 3rd edition table of > contents so one can compare between > the two editions for better judgement. > unfortunate, those were a few examples i have time to point > out. I think may make a great difference. Okay, thanks. You've provided a pretty good representative selection, I think. I guess there are two problems: the third edition index is woefully incomplete, and the fourth edition text has for some reason basically traded FreeBSD for AIX -- which makes little sense to me. I appreciate the time you put into this. -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: question on SYN_SENT
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri May 11 17:19:29 2012 > From: "Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC" > Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 16:15:48 -0600 > To: Chuck Swiger > Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List > Subject: Re: question on SYN_SENT > > > On May 11, 2012, at 4:08 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote: > > > On May 11, 2012, at 2:09 PM, Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC wrote: > >> it is my understanding that SYN_SENT is when MY SIDE sends out a reques > >> t and is awaiting a reply? > > > > That's right. > > > >> One of the jails we run for a customer had hundreds (if not thousands) o > >> f attempts to connect from the 147. address you see below. Correction. As Chuck pointed out it is your box attempting to connect *TO* that address. > >> It was exha > >> usting resources so that new tcp connections could not be made until som > >> e closed. > > > > You have/had your jail opening connections to the webserver at IP 147.237 > > .76.155, not that IP trying to connect to you. > > > >> I added that address to a "pf" block statement to stop it but now we get > >> a rolling connections in a "netstat -a" as show below (host. being a ge > >> neric name used in place of actual host on our side). I am wondering i > >> f this shows something on our side trying to connect out? That is what > >> it appears to me to be, which does not make sense. > >> > >> > >> tcp4 0 0 host.52562 147.237.76.155.httpSYN_SENT > >> tcp4 0 0 host.52561 147.237.76.155.httpSYN_SENT > > > > Yes, your side is trying to connect out. > > Unless you know better, it seems reasonable to gather that it's doing a D > > oS attack against: > > Hi Chuck! > > Thanks. I am investigating as this side should not be going out at all, bu > t the SYN_SENT made me think it was. > 'Should not' does not mean 'is not'. and unfortunately, it -is- attempting to "go out". There are at least a couple of possible explanations, none of them "good". 1) the jail is attempting a DoS (or participating in DDoS) against an Israeli _government_ network/machine. 2) the jail is 'owned' by a botnet, and is trying to 'phone home' for instructions. The webserver on the IP address listed has -extremely- 'suspicious' content, to wit; html> body> script> document.cookie='fff=ee0333b9fff_ee0333b9; path=/'; window.location.href=window.location.href; /script> /body> /html> ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: question on SYN_SENT
On May 11, 2012, at 2:09 PM, Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC wrote:
> it is my understanding that SYN_SENT is when MY SIDE sends out a request and
> is awaiting a reply?
That's right.
> One of the jails we run for a customer had hundreds (if not thousands) of
> attempts to connect from the 147. address you see below. It was exhausting
> resources so that new tcp connections could not be made until some closed.
You have/had your jail opening connections to the webserver at IP
147.237.76.155, not that IP trying to connect to you.
> I added that address to a "pf" block statement to stop it but now we get a
> rolling connections in a "netstat -a" as show below (host. being a generic
> name used in place of actual host on our side). I am wondering if this
> shows something on our side trying to connect out? That is what it appears
> to me to be, which does not make sense.
>
>
> tcp4 0 0 host.52562 147.237.76.155.httpSYN_SENT
> tcp4 0 0 host.52561 147.237.76.155.httpSYN_SENT
Yes, your side is trying to connect out.
Unless you know better, it seems reasonable to gather that it's doing a DoS
attack against:
% whois 147.237.76.155
[ ... ]
inetnum: 147.237.0.0 - 147.237.255.255
netname: IL-GOVT-NET
descr:Israeli Government Network
country: IL
admin-c: AT979-RIPE
tech-c: TT441-RIPE
status: ASSIGNED PI
mnt-by: GOV-IL-DNS
mnt-lower:GOV-IL-DNS
mnt-routes: AS8867-MNT { ANY }
mnt-routes: AS9116-MNT { 147.237.232.0/24^24-24 }
source: RIPE # Filtered
person: Admin Tehila
address:Israel Ministry Of Finance
address:1 Netanel Lorech st
address:Jerusalem Israel
phone: +972 2 6664666
fax-no: +972 2 6664650
remarks:For ABUSE and security issues please contact
remarks:email: ab...@tehila.gov.il
remarks:or contact CERT.gov.il at rep...@cert.gov.il
nic-hdl:AT979-RIPE
source: RIPE # Filtered
Regards,
--
-Chuck
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: question on SYN_SENT
On May 11, 2012, at 4:08 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On May 11, 2012, at 2:09 PM, Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC wrote:
>> it is my understanding that SYN_SENT is when MY SIDE sends out a request and
>> is awaiting a reply?
>
> That's right.
>
>> One of the jails we run for a customer had hundreds (if not thousands) of
>> attempts to connect from the 147. address you see below. It was exhausting
>> resources so that new tcp connections could not be made until some closed.
>
> You have/had your jail opening connections to the webserver at IP
> 147.237.76.155, not that IP trying to connect to you.
>
>> I added that address to a "pf" block statement to stop it but now we get a
>> rolling connections in a "netstat -a" as show below (host. being a generic
>> name used in place of actual host on our side). I am wondering if this
>> shows something on our side trying to connect out? That is what it appears
>> to me to be, which does not make sense.
>>
>>
>> tcp4 0 0 host.52562 147.237.76.155.httpSYN_SENT
>> tcp4 0 0 host.52561 147.237.76.155.httpSYN_SENT
>
> Yes, your side is trying to connect out.
> Unless you know better, it seems reasonable to gather that it's doing a DoS
> attack against:
Hi Chuck!
Thanks. I am investigating as this side should not be going out at all, but
the SYN_SENT made me think it was.
Thanks
Chad
>
> % whois 147.237.76.155
> [ ... ]
> inetnum: 147.237.0.0 - 147.237.255.255
> netname: IL-GOVT-NET
> descr:Israeli Government Network
> country: IL
> admin-c: AT979-RIPE
> tech-c: TT441-RIPE
> status: ASSIGNED PI
> mnt-by: GOV-IL-DNS
> mnt-lower:GOV-IL-DNS
> mnt-routes: AS8867-MNT { ANY }
> mnt-routes: AS9116-MNT { 147.237.232.0/24^24-24 }
> source: RIPE # Filtered
>
> person: Admin Tehila
> address:Israel Ministry Of Finance
> address:1 Netanel Lorech st
> address:Jerusalem Israel
> phone: +972 2 6664666
> fax-no: +972 2 6664650
> remarks:For ABUSE and security issues please contact
> remarks:email: ab...@tehila.gov.il
> remarks:or contact CERT.gov.il at rep...@cert.gov.il
> nic-hdl:AT979-RIPE
> source: RIPE # Filtered
>
> Regards,
> --
> -Chuck
>
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
question on SYN_SENT
it is my understanding that SYN_SENT is when MY SIDE sends out a request and is awaiting a reply? One of the jails we run for a customer had hundreds (if not thousands) of attempts to connect from the 147. address you see below. It was exhausting resources so that new tcp connections could not be made until some closed. I added that address to a "pf" block statement to stop it but now we get a rolling connections in a "netstat -a" as show below (host. being a generic name used in place of actual host on our side). I am wondering if this shows something on our side trying to connect out? That is what it appears to me to be, which does not make sense. tcp4 0 0 host.52562 147.237.76.155.httpSYN_SENT tcp4 0 0 host.52561 147.237.76.155.httpSYN_SENT tcp4 0 0 host.52560 147.237.76.155.httpSYN_SENT tcp4 0 0 host.52559 147.237.76.155.httpSYN_SENT tcp4 0 0 host.52558 147.237.76.155.httpSYN_SENT tcp4 0 0 host.52557 147.237.76.155.httpSYN_SENT tcp4 0 0 host.52556 147.237.76.155.httpSYN_SENT tcp4 0 0 host.52555 147.237.76.155.httpSYN_SENT tcp4 0 0 host.52554 147.237.76.155.httpSYN_SENT tcp4 0 0 host.52553 147.237.76.155.httpSYN_SENT tcp4 0 0 host.52552 147.237.76.155.httpSYN_SENT tcp4 0 0 host.52551 147.237.76.155.httpSYN_SENT tcp4 0 0 host.52550 147.237.76.155.httpSYN_SENT thanks Chad ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: UFS Crash and directories now missing
On 05/11/2012 12:11 PM, Edward M wrote: So far I think I found a few that may make a difference. According to the "table of contents" in the 4th edition in the chapter called "Booting and shuting down it only shows entries for: red hat, HP-UX, AIX, SUSE,Ubuntu. However in the third edition, show entries for FreeBSD's Booting and shuting down process. And another example is in the 4th edition the chapter called "Adding new users", only mentions how to add users for: SUSE, Redhat Solaris HP-UX and AIX. However in the 3rd edition, explains how to add users on FreeBSD and how FreeBSD's master.passwd file, login.conf. work,etc The third edition's chapter called "Drivers and the kernel" shows how to build a freebsd kernel, create a BSD config file, tuning the freebsd kernel, add freebsd device drivers,etc. I was not able to find those entries in the the 4th editions "Drivers and the kernel. chapter.the 3rd editions TCP/IP chapter shows network config for freebsd. However in the table of contents of the 4th edition does not. I'm searching for a website that contains the 3rd edition table of contents so one can compare between the two editions for better judgement. unfortunate, those were a few examples i have time to point out. I think may make a great difference. I apologized, if my email came out looking strange with chopped up/ uneven sentences,etc. I have to check into that:-( ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: UFS Crash and directories now missing
On 05/11/2012 10:47 AM, Chad Perrin wrote: Is there something else I should try to find in the index or table of contents that would be in the third edition but not the fourth? Can you give me some examples of the sorts of things you'd expect to find in the table of contents that is lacking in the fourth edition but present in the third? Hi,:-) So far I think I found a few that may make a difference. According to the "table of contents" in the 4th edition in the chapter called "Booting and shuting down it only shows entries for: red hat, HP-UX, AIX, SUSE,Ubuntu. However in the third edition, show entries for FreeBSD's Booting and shuting down process. And another example is in the 4th edition the chapter called "Adding new users", only mentions how to add users for: SUSE, Redhat Solaris HP-UX and AIX. However in the 3rd edition, explains how to add users on FreeBSD and how FreeBSD's master.passwd file, login.conf. work,etc The third edition's chapter called "Drivers and the kernel" shows how to build a freebsd kernel, create a BSD config file, tuning the freebsd kernel, add freebsd device drivers,etc. I was not able to find those entries in the the 4th editions "Drivers and the kernel. chapter.the 3rd editions TCP/IP chapter shows network config for freebsd. However in the table of contents of the 4th edition does not. I'm searching for a website that contains the 3rd edition table of contents so one can compare between the two editions for better judgement. unfortunate, those were a few examples i have time to point out. I think may make a great difference. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: UFS Crash and directories now missing
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 06:29:05PM -0700, Edward M wrote: > On 05/10/2012 03:45 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote: > >Regarding Nemeth's I am undecided between the 4th (Unix& Linux) or > >the 3rd. Please advise. > > i purchased the third edition because I took a look in the 4th > the table of contents > and it appears anything FreeBSD related was remove and it > only focuses on: Solaris > Linux( red hat ubuntu) and AIX. However third edition mentions BSDs >From the index of my copy of the third edition, I see these entries: 4.4BSD 2 . . . BSD (Berkeley UNIX) 2 . . . FreeBSD 4 >From the index of my copy of the fourth edition, I see these entries: BSD Printing 1054-1065 see also printing architecture 1054-1055 configuration 1059-1065 lpc command 1057-1059 lpd daemon 1056 lpq command 1056-1057 lpr command 1056 lprm command 1057 printcap file 1059-1065 PRINTER environment variable 1054 BSD UNIX 8, 12, 1268-1273 . . . FreeBSD 8 . . . NetBSD 8 . . . OpenBSD 8 Page 8 of the fourth edition mentions various BSD Unix systems in the section "Friction Between UNIX and Linux". Page 12's mention of BSD Unix in the fourth edition appears to correspond to page 3's un-indexed mention of FreeBSD in the third edition (specifically FreeBSD 3.4), in reference to the example Unix OSes they chose to use when discussing various OSes, though FreeBSD is not mentioned specifically in the fourth edition on that page and BSD Unix is largely referred to in a historical context. This appears to be a legitimate case of BSD Unix being phased out of part of the text as a relevant OS, but it is not a section that actually says anything of specific technical value. Pages 1268-1273 in the fourth edition correspond to the bulk of the section "A Brief History of System Administration" in the back of the book. The third edition's equivalent is the end of page 2 and a little over half of page 3, "The Sordid History of UNIX". The fourth edition's index mentions "jail, chroot" which, when investigated in the text, has nothing at all to do with FreeBSD jails; it's just about chroot. The third edition also contains information about chroot, but does not mention it under the J section of the index. It looks to me like the fourth edition probably presents quite a bit more historical information particular to BSD Unix systems than the third edition, judging by the index. In the table of contents, I see that the third edition has a section set aside for BSD printing, despite lack of mention in the index. It looks like the table of contents section for "BSD and AIX printing" in the fourth edition (the first edition to include coverage of AIX, apparently) goes into a fair bit more detail about what's in the equivalent section. It looks to me, at a glance, like the fourth edition probably kept all of the BSD Unix related stuff from the third, probably updated slightly but not expanded outside of historical information. While a failure to expand technical information on BSD Unix systems would result in a reduction of the percentage of the book that covers BSD Unix technical matters, given the growth in size between third and fourth editions, the quantity of technical information about BSD Unix systems does not appear to have shrunk at all, from what I've seen. Of course, I might easily have overlooked something. Is there something else I should try to find in the index or table of contents that would be in the third edition but not the fourth? Can you give me some examples of the sorts of things you'd expect to find in the table of contents that is lacking in the fourth edition but present in the third? -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Firefox will not start
2012-05-11 12:48, fake fake skrev: $firefox returns this: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/firefox/libmozsqlite3.so: Undefined symbol "posix_fallocate" It seems failed to link, but how to solve this? System Information FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE amd64 Reinstall sqlite3. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Problem with SSL ans "net/sendemail"
Error message: invalid SSL_version specified at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.2/IO/Socket/SSL.pm line 308 This is generated by the "sendEmail" program. The "net/sendemail" port compiled with SSL support. make showconfig ===> The following configuration options are available for sendEmail-1.56: SSL=on "Enable SSL support" This was working fine until today. This all started after a reboot of the system. ssh -V OpenSSH_5.4p1_hpn13v11 FreeBSD-20100308, OpenSSL 0.9.8q 2 Dec 2010 openssl version OpenSSL 1.0.1a 19 Apr 2012 It appears I have two different versions of OpenSSL installed. I deliberately installed the newer version and placed this in the "/etc/make.conf" file: WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes I have no idea what happened or how to correct this problem. I tried rebuilding Perl and the two ports listed in the "sendemail" port and the "sendemail" port itself without a satisfactory result. By the way, I noticed that "OpenSSH 6.0" was released April 22, 2012. Are there any plans to get that into the ports system, or better yet, replace the aging base system? -- Carmel ✌ carmel...@hotmail.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Firefox will not start
$firefox returns this: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/firefox/libmozsqlite3.so: Undefined symbol "posix_fallocate" It seems failed to link, but how to solve this? System Information FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE amd64 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: UFS Crash and directories now missing
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Polytropon wrote:
> On Wed, 9 May 2012 09:30:37 -0400, Alejandro Imass wrote:
>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Erich Dollansky
>> wrote:
>> >> For your recommendation above, what are the advantages or differences
>> >> of slicing the disk versus partitioning on a single slice?
>> >>
>> > it could be a misunderstanding. What is a partition? What is a slice. I
>> > have to look always into the handbook. Anyway, as long the OS see
>> > different units which have to be mounted independent of each other, it all
>> > does not matter what is what.
>> >
>>
>> I meant in Unix terms of course. Slice is slice (partition in other
>> OS) and partition a thru h
>>
>> The question is if it has any advantage of using a slice to mount the
>> basejail in RO as opposed to doing the same thing on a partition.
>
> The answer is: It it not possible. :-)
>
> You cannot mount a slice.
>
> Given the BSD terminology: A slice _has_ to contain partitions.
> You cannot format a slice, you can only format partitions. A
> formatted partition carries a UFS file system. (However, it's
> possible to omit the slice, and partition the whole disk instead,
> this is called "dedicated mode"). A third method is formatting
> the whole disk ("the 'c' device"), in that case the 'c' is omitted.
>
> The _only_ time you can mount a slice is when it is used in its
> common meaning, being a "DOS primary partition"; in this case,
> a FAT or NTFS file system will be placed directly into a slice,
> as those do not support any (BSD-style) partitioning.
>
> /dev/ad0 -> the disk
> /dev/ad0s1 -> 1st slice
> /dev/ad0s1a -> 1st partition on 1st slice
> THIS is something you can mount.
> -or-
> /dev/ad0a -> 1st partition on disk ("dedicated")
> THIS can also be mounted.
> -or-
> /dev/ad0 -> the whole disk (equals /dev/ad0c)
> Even THIS can be mounted.
>
> In case I'm misunderstanding your question, could you alter the
> expression?
>
Thanks. The question was more advantages of a single slice + single
partition versus a slice and multiple partitions, for mounting the
EzJail basejail in RO mode.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: UFS Crash and directories now missing
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Edward M wrote: > On 05/10/2012 03:45 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote: >> >> Regarding Nemeth's I am undecided between the 4th (Unix& Linux) or >> the 3rd. Please advise. > > > i purchased the third edition because I took a look in the 4th the table > of contents > and it appears anything FreeBSD related was remove and it only > focuses on: Solaris > Linux( red hat ubuntu) and AIX. However third edition mentions BSDs > Yep, agreed. 3rd edition it is. Thanks, -- Alejandro Imass ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
newfs on a SSD
After years of waiting for a decent price on one of these I finally got one. The questions is, which options should I use on a SSD that will be / on my system. I see that newfs supports TRIM, so that will be turned on, but should I use journaling? gjournal? softupdates? soft updates journaling? I'm confused :) -- chs, ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
