RE: (starbucks) "ssid = tmobile" and 5.x (hit-n-miss)
Hello Bill, H. that's odd. I guess the WiFi card works perfectly elsewhere? -- Jonathan -- Jonathan M. Slivko - [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Linux: The Choice for the GNU Generation" - http://www.linux.org/ - Don't fear the penguin. .^. /V\ /( )\ ^^-^^ He's here to help. -Original Message- From: Bill Schoolcraft [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 12:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: 'Bill Schoolcraft'; 'bsd' Subject: RE: (starbucks) "ssid = tmobile" and 5.x (hit-n-miss) At Thu, 16 Jun 2005 it looks like Jonathan M. Slivko composed: > Hello, > > Have you tried watching the wifi session in debug mode and see if it's > erroring somewhere? (i.e. their WiFi network doesn't like your laptop since > it's running *BSD, I know that my starbucks connection doesn't like my > laptop sometimes). It could also be that the WiFi network is scanning for > the WiFi client on the machine, and when it doesn't find it - it won't allow > it to log on. > > -- Jonathan Thanks Jonathan, No, I have not tried wifi in debug mode, will have to find how to do so and try it. I do tail /var/log/messages and in some cases actually see the connection get created to the AP, it's then that I launch my browser and all is well. If I launch my browser prior to seeing the ack from the AP I seem to mess the parade up. I have found that if I wait till I'm in "X" and have a root xterm going "then" insert my card I can watch the full ballet between the nic and the AP and have my browser ready to launch. Then all is well. -- Bill Schoolcraft PO Box 210076 San Francisco, CA 94121 "UNIX, A Way of Life." http://billschoolcraft.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: (starbucks) "ssid = tmobile" and 5.x (hit-n-miss)
Hello, Have you tried watching the wifi session in debug mode and see if it's erroring somewhere? (i.e. their WiFi network doesn't like your laptop since it's running *BSD, I know that my starbucks connection doesn't like my laptop sometimes). It could also be that the WiFi network is scanning for the WiFi client on the machine, and when it doesn't find it - it won't allow it to log on. -- Jonathan -- Jonathan M. Slivko - [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Linux: The Choice for the GNU Generation" - http://www.linux.org/ - Don't fear the penguin. .^. /V\ /( )\ ^^-^^ He's here to help. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Schoolcraft Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 8:07 PM To: bsd Subject: (starbucks) "ssid = tmobile" and 5.x (hit-n-miss) Hello Family, Well sometimes I wish I had all the answers... I need some advice. When I proudly bring my FreeBSD-5.x laptop(s) into Starbucks, I have my "wi0" set for "DHCP" in /etc/rc.conf and I never have consistant handshakes with the server, same coffee shop, same everything. Sometimes I'm so pressed for time that I can't go through all the "ifconfig wi0 ..." commands and I just have to reboot into godammmed windows and it friggin works. FUCKING HUMILIATING. (sorry for the adj.) Does anyone have any supplimental arguments to /etc/rc.conf to get me onto my account at Starbucks? I firmly believe one cannot: "Save Face And Ass At Same Time" hence my email. Thank You :) Yahoo! Sports Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: Logging via Serial Port
Jeff, Sounds like you need to read about getty and friends :) -- Jonathan -- Jonathan M. Slivko - [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Linux: The Choice for the GNU Generation" - http://www.linux.org/ - Don't fear the penguin. .^. /V\ /( )\ ^^-^^ He's here to help. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Tollison Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 10:10 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Logging via Serial Port Hi, I have a phone system that I need to log information from to a FreeBSD box via a serial cable. What would be the best way to "listen" to the serial port and write those messages to a log file? I have looked in the archives and googled, but still no luck. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks -- Jeff Tollison jptollison at gmail dot com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: mplayer doesn't want to be built
Did you try a cvsup and see if maybe there's a newer package, or a fix to this? -- Jonathan Simeon Nifos wrote: trying to install mplayer from the latest port MPlayer-1.0pre7.tar.bz2 I come across the following: # make -DWITH_GTK1 install N - O - T - E Take a careful look into the Makefile in order to learn how to tune mplayer towards you personal preferences! For example, make WITH_GTK1 builds MPlayer with GTK1-GUI support. If you want to use the GUI, you can either install /usr/ports/multimedia/mplayer-skins or download official skin collections from http://www.mplayerhq.hu/homepage/dload.html ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ===> Extracting for mplayer-gtk-esound-0.99.7_2 => Checksum OK for MPlayer-1.0pre7.tar.bz2. ===> Patching for mplayer-gtk-esound-0.99.7_2 ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for mplayer-gtk-esound-0.99.7_2 2 out of 2 hunks failed--saving rejects to libmpcodecs/ve_x264.c.rej => Patch patch-libmpcodecs-ve_x264.c failed to apply cleanly. => Patch(es) patch-TOOLS-cpuinfo.c patch-ad patch-ae patch-bswap.h patch-cpudetect.h patch-libao2-ao_arts.c patch-libavcodec-bswap.h patch-libdha-Makefile patch -libfaad2-common.h applied cleanly. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/multimedia/mplayer. Is there anything I can do? Thanks in advance! Simeon! __ Yahoo! Mail Mobile Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- Jonathan M. Slivko - [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Linux: The Choice for the GNU Generation" - http://www.linux.org/ - Don't fear the penguin. .^. /V\ /( )\ ^^-^^ He's here to help. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Top only showing one active CPU on HTT system
Yes, it is. -- Jonathan Kris Kennaway wrote: On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 02:24:59PM -0400, Jonathan M. Slivko wrote: Hmmm I just tried that on my system thats supposedly an HT P4 but it didn't work after recompiling the kernel as well as setting that sysctl call. Make sure your kernel is compiled with SMP support and your BIOS enables HTT. Kris -- Jonathan M. Slivko - [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Linux: The Choice for the GNU Generation" - http://www.linux.org/ - Don't fear the penguin. .^. /V\ /( )\ ^^-^^ He's here to help. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Top only showing one active CPU on HTT system
Hmmm I just tried that on my system thats supposedly an HT P4 but it didn't work after recompiling the kernel as well as setting that sysctl call. Kirk Strauser wrote: On Tuesday 24 May 2005 12:13, Jonathan M. Slivko wrote: Where did you actually set that, in /etc/sysctl.conf? Yep. -- Jonathan M. Slivko - [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Linux: The Choice for the GNU Generation" - http://www.linux.org/ - Don't fear the penguin. .^. /V\ /( )\ ^^-^^ He's here to help. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Top only showing one active CPU on HTT system
Where did you actually set that, in /etc/sysctl.conf? Kirk Strauser wrote: On Tuesday 24 May 2005 10:59, Tim Kellers wrote: The acpi_load="YES" in /boot/loader.conf might do the trick. Actually, it turns out that I have to set machdep.hyperthreading_allowed=1 for HTT to work now. Speaking of which, is that tunable documented anywhere besides the HTT security PR? It's not in the 5.4-STABLE /usr/src/UPDATING or anyplace else I've looked, so I was more than a bit surprised to find that such an important default was changed without much notice. I imagine a lot of people read the PR much as I did: "blah, blah, theoretical, doesn't affect me, next message"... -- Jonathan M. Slivko - [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Linux: The Choice for the GNU Generation" - http://www.linux.org/ - Don't fear the penguin. .^. /V\ /( )\ ^^-^^ He's here to help. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: 3Ware SATA RAID 8000 - Supported on 5.3-R?
OK, I added that. (it was actually already in /etc/defaults/rc.conf)
-- Jonathan
Franco Bruno Borghesi wrote:
If it fails it's because there are certain inconsistencies that need
user confirmation before they are corrected.
You can add
fsck_y_enable="YES"
to your /etc/rc.conf so if default fsck fails, fsck -y is run. Check the
fsck man page before doing so.
Anyway, I don't understand why fsck is run on every reboot. If you just
try a "reboot" or a "shutdown -r now" command in your console, will fsck
run next time the system boots? It should'n happen. I don't understand
why your file systems get uncleanly umounted.
About freebsd 5.3, I've been using 3ware 7500-4LP (in raid 5) for the
last 3 months, and I have not had such (nor any other) problems with twe
driver.
Hope it helps.
2005/5/24, Jonathan M. Slivko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>:
Whether I run fsck manually or if I run it automagically at boot via rc
(which happens every reboot), it fails. As I'm not at console, I can't
tell whether the same things happen if the box is physically taken
down.
and fsck'd in single user mode. The better part of the question is,
could this be the RAID card throwing out false errors due to not having
complete support for 5.3-R?, as it says that it only supports the 4.x
series.
-- Jonathan
Franco Bruno Borghesi wrote:
> Your fstab is OK.
>
> I don't exactly understand the problem. When you boot fsck will run
> automatically if the system did not correctly shut down. This is
done
> *before* disks are mounted rw, so there's no way you will see the
"(NO
> WRITE)" message.
>
> If system was not correctly shut down, fsck will run, and it
*will* (and
> should) slow down system boot process.
>
> So, is it the problem that fsck is running *every* time you boot?
Or is
> it that you get this "(NO WRITE)" message when you run it manually?
>
>
> 2005/5/24, Jonathan M. Slivko < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED](~)% cat /etc/fstab
> #
DeviceMountpoint FStype Options Dump
> Pass#
> /dev/twed0s1b
> noneswapsw 0 0
> /dev/twed0s1a / ufs
> rw 1 1
> /dev/twed0s1g /home ufs
rw,userquota,groupquota
> 2 2
> /dev/twed0s1d /tmpufs
> rw 2 2
> /dev/twed0s1e /usrufs
> rw 2 2
> /dev/twed0s1f /varufs
> rw 2 2
> /dev/acd0 /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto
> 0 0
> none /proc
> procfs rw 0 0
> [EMAIL PROTECTED](~)%
>
>
> Franco Bruno Borghesi wrote:
> > Could you post your /etc/fstab?
> >
> > 2005/5/24, Jonathan M. Slivko < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> >:
> >
> >>Yes, this is actually the autoboot fsck thats breaking,
the one
> that is
> >>called from /etc/rc (via /etc/rc.d/). I can physically
take the
> box down
> >>and do an offline fsck of it and that works fine, it's
just when
> it's in
> >>multi-user mode thats the problem.
> >>
> >>-- Jonathan
> >>
> >>Franco Bruno Borghesi wrote:
> >>
> >>>For fsck to work (to actually correct any problems you
may have),
> >>>partitions should be umounted first. Are you sure you
have umounted
> >>>/dev/twed before running fsck?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>2005/5/24, Jonathan M. Slivko < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> >>>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>>:
> >>>
> >>
Re: Top only showing one active CPU on HTT system
Actually, I have a similar issue on a Pentium 4 box that's supposedly HT: CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz (2410.53-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1 Features=0xbfebfbff By the fact that HTT is there in the features, I'm assuming that HT support is actually present. Though when I compile my kernel with SMP support, it doesn't show up. I've had the box checked in the BIOS for HT settings, but apparently there are none. Any ideas? Kirk Strauser wrote: I'm running a 5.4-STABLE system (updated as of May 16). My kernel is basically GENERIC with a few small tweaks, like commenting out extraneous "cpu" lines and adding "options SMP". My problem is that although dmesg shows every sign of having launched both logical CPUs: $ dmesg | grep -i cpu CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz (2392.05-MHz 686-class CPU) Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 cpu0: on acpi0 cpu1: on acpi0 SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! ... running "top" only shows "0" in the CPU column for every task. I don't see anything out of place in sysctl: $ sysctl -a | grep -i hlt machdep.cpu_idle_hlt: 1 machdep.hlt_cpus: 2 machdep.hlt_logical_cpus: 0 and /boot/loader.conf is all but empty. Honestly, I don't really know how long this has been going on. top used to show both 0 and 1 in the C column and I'm not exactly sure when it stopped. Any ideas? -- Jonathan M. Slivko - [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Linux: The Choice for the GNU Generation" - http://www.linux.org/ - Don't fear the penguin. .^. /V\ /( )\ ^^-^^ He's here to help. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: 3Ware SATA RAID 8000 - Supported on 5.3-R?
You can see the file that my box is choking on in /etc/rc.d/fsck. -- Jonathan Franco Bruno Borghesi wrote: Your fstab is OK. I don't exactly understand the problem. When you boot fsck will run automatically if the system did not correctly shut down. This is done *before* disks are mounted rw, so there's no way you will see the "(NO WRITE)" message. If system was not correctly shut down, fsck will run, and it *will* (and should) slow down system boot process. So, is it the problem that fsck is running *every* time you boot? Or is it that you get this "(NO WRITE)" message when you run it manually? 2005/5/24, Jonathan M. Slivko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [EMAIL PROTECTED](~)% cat /etc/fstab # Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump Pass# /dev/twed0s1b none swap sw 0 0 /dev/twed0s1a / ufs rw 1 1 /dev/twed0s1g /home ufs rw,userquota,groupquota 2 2 /dev/twed0s1d /tmp ufs rw 2 2 /dev/twed0s1e /usr ufs rw 2 2 /dev/twed0s1f /var ufs rw 2 2 /dev/acd0 /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto 0 0 none /proc procfs rw 0 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED](~)% Franco Bruno Borghesi wrote: Could you post your /etc/fstab? 2005/5/24, Jonathan M. Slivko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Yes, this is actually the autoboot fsck thats breaking, the one that is called from /etc/rc (via /etc/rc.d/). I can physically take the box down and do an offline fsck of it and that works fine, it's just when it's in multi-user mode thats the problem. -- Jonathan Franco Bruno Borghesi wrote: For fsck to work (to actually correct any problems you may have), partitions should be umounted first. Are you sure you have umounted /dev/twed before running fsck? 2005/5/24, Jonathan M. Slivko <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>: Hello, I have an interesting question, I have a Pentium 4 2.4Ghz (No HT Enabled), 2x80GB SATA Hard Drives in RAID 1. The box boots, works, etc. However, whenever you try and do an fsck -y, it says: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (~)% fsck -y ** /dev/twed0s1a (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on / ** Root file system ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups 2821 files, 31805 used, 474682 free (322 frags, 59295 blocks, 0.1% fragmentation) ** /dev/twed0s1g (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on /home ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups 82057 files, 557735 used, 12912399 free (2343 frags, 1613757 blocks, 0.0% fragmentation) ** /dev/twed0s1d (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on /tmp ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups 30 files, 1787 used, 504700 free (20 frags, 63085 blocks, 0.0% fragmentation) ** /dev/twed0s1e (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on /usr ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups 251160 files, 1318908 used, 13912410 free (73346 frags, 1729883 blocks, 0.5% fragmentation) ** /dev/twed0s1f (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on /var ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups 4424 files, 63321 used, 7042830 free (2462 frags, 880046 blocks, 0.0% fragmentation) The drives are Seagate SATA's (7200RPM) with a 3Ware SATA RAID Controller (8006-2LP) using the twe kernel driver. The drives themselves allow data to be read to/written from them, but fsck will not work (and is hanging things on boot). Anyone got any ideas? I looked at www.3ware.com <http://www.3ware.com>< http://www.3ware.com> <http://www.3ware.com> earlier and it says that the 8006-2LP's support FreeBSD 4.x, but not 5.x - could this be a result of that, seeing as otherwise the drives/RAID work fine (AFAIK, it could not be and I'm just not sure how to test it). TIA, -- Jonathan ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to " [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" -- Jonathan M. Slivko - [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Linux: The Choice for the GNU Generation" - http://www.linux.org/ - Don't fear the penguin. .^. /V\ /( )\ ^^-^^ He's here to help. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to " [EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- Jonathan M. Slivko - [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Linux: The Choice for the GNU Generation" - http://www.linux.org/
Re: 3Ware SATA RAID 8000 - Supported on 5.3-R?
Whether I run fsck manually or if I run it automagically at boot via rc
(which happens every reboot), it fails. As I'm not at console, I can't
tell whether the same things happen if the box is physically taken down.
and fsck'd in single user mode. The better part of the question is,
could this be the RAID card throwing out false errors due to not having
complete support for 5.3-R?, as it says that it only supports the 4.x
series.
-- Jonathan
Franco Bruno Borghesi wrote:
Your fstab is OK.
I don't exactly understand the problem. When you boot fsck will run
automatically if the system did not correctly shut down. This is done
*before* disks are mounted rw, so there's no way you will see the "(NO
WRITE)" message.
If system was not correctly shut down, fsck will run, and it *will* (and
should) slow down system boot process.
So, is it the problem that fsck is running *every* time you boot? Or is
it that you get this "(NO WRITE)" message when you run it manually?
2005/5/24, Jonathan M. Slivko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>:
[EMAIL PROTECTED](~)% cat /etc/fstab
# DeviceMountpoint FStype Options Dump
Pass#
/dev/twed0s1b
noneswapsw 0 0
/dev/twed0s1a / ufs
rw 1 1
/dev/twed0s1g /home ufs rw,userquota,groupquota
2 2
/dev/twed0s1d /tmpufs
rw 2 2
/dev/twed0s1e /usrufs
rw 2 2
/dev/twed0s1f /varufs
rw 2 2
/dev/acd0 /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto
0 0
none/proc
procfs rw 0 0
[EMAIL PROTECTED](~)%
Franco Bruno Borghesi wrote:
> Could you post your /etc/fstab?
>
> 2005/5/24, Jonathan M. Slivko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >:
>
>>Yes, this is actually the autoboot fsck thats breaking, the one
that is
>>called from /etc/rc (via /etc/rc.d/). I can physically take the
box down
>>and do an offline fsck of it and that works fine, it's just when
it's in
>>multi-user mode thats the problem.
>>
>>-- Jonathan
>>
>>Franco Bruno Borghesi wrote:
>>
>>>For fsck to work (to actually correct any problems you may have),
>>>partitions should be umounted first. Are you sure you have umounted
>>>/dev/twed before running fsck?
>>>
>>>
>>>2005/5/24, Jonathan M. Slivko < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>><mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>:
>>>
>>>Hello,
>>>
>>>I have an interesting question, I have a Pentium 4 2.4Ghz (No HT
>>>Enabled),
>>>2x80GB SATA Hard Drives in RAID 1. The box boots, works, etc.
However,
>>>whenever you try and do an fsck -y, it says:
>>>
>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (~)% fsck -y
>>>** /dev/twed0s1a (NO WRITE)
>>>** Last Mounted on /
>>>** Root file system
>>>** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
>>>** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames
>>>** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity
>>>** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts
>>>** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups
>>>2821 files, 31805 used, 474682 free (322 frags, 59295 blocks, 0.1%
>>>fragmentation)
>>>
>>>** /dev/twed0s1g (NO WRITE)
>>>** Last Mounted on /home
>>>** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
>>>** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames
>>>** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity
>>>** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts
>>>** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups
>>>82057 files, 557735 used, 12912399 free (2343 frags, 1613757
blocks,
>>>0.0%
>>>fragmentation)
>>>
>>>** /dev/twed0s1d (NO WRITE)
>>>** Last Mounted on /tmp
>>>** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
>>>** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames
>>>** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity
>>>** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts
>>>** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups
>>>30 files, 1787 used, 504700 free (20 frags, 63085 blocks, 0.0%
>>>fragmentation)
>>>
>>>** /dev/twed0s1e (NO WRITE)
>>>** Last Mounted on /usr
>>&g
Re: 3Ware SATA RAID 8000 - Supported on 5.3-R?
[EMAIL PROTECTED](~)% cat /etc/fstab # DeviceMountpoint FStype Options Dump Pass# /dev/twed0s1b noneswapsw 0 0 /dev/twed0s1a / ufs rw 1 1 /dev/twed0s1g /home ufs rw,userquota,groupquota 2 2 /dev/twed0s1d /tmpufs rw 2 2 /dev/twed0s1e /usrufs rw 2 2 /dev/twed0s1f /varufs rw 2 2 /dev/acd0 /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto 0 0 none/proc procfs rw 0 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED](~)% Franco Bruno Borghesi wrote: Could you post your /etc/fstab? 2005/5/24, Jonathan M. Slivko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Yes, this is actually the autoboot fsck thats breaking, the one that is called from /etc/rc (via /etc/rc.d/). I can physically take the box down and do an offline fsck of it and that works fine, it's just when it's in multi-user mode thats the problem. -- Jonathan Franco Bruno Borghesi wrote: For fsck to work (to actually correct any problems you may have), partitions should be umounted first. Are you sure you have umounted /dev/twed before running fsck? 2005/5/24, Jonathan M. Slivko <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>: Hello, I have an interesting question, I have a Pentium 4 2.4Ghz (No HT Enabled), 2x80GB SATA Hard Drives in RAID 1. The box boots, works, etc. However, whenever you try and do an fsck -y, it says: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (~)% fsck -y ** /dev/twed0s1a (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on / ** Root file system ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups 2821 files, 31805 used, 474682 free (322 frags, 59295 blocks, 0.1% fragmentation) ** /dev/twed0s1g (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on /home ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups 82057 files, 557735 used, 12912399 free (2343 frags, 1613757 blocks, 0.0% fragmentation) ** /dev/twed0s1d (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on /tmp ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups 30 files, 1787 used, 504700 free (20 frags, 63085 blocks, 0.0% fragmentation) ** /dev/twed0s1e (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on /usr ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups 251160 files, 1318908 used, 13912410 free (73346 frags, 1729883 blocks, 0.5% fragmentation) ** /dev/twed0s1f (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on /var ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups 4424 files, 63321 used, 7042830 free (2462 frags, 880046 blocks, 0.0% fragmentation) The drives are Seagate SATA's (7200RPM) with a 3Ware SATA RAID Controller (8006-2LP) using the twe kernel driver. The drives themselves allow data to be read to/written from them, but fsck will not work (and is hanging things on boot). Anyone got any ideas? I looked at www.3ware.com <http://www.3ware.com> <http://www.3ware.com> earlier and it says that the 8006-2LP's support FreeBSD 4.x, but not 5.x - could this be a result of that, seeing as otherwise the drives/RAID work fine (AFAIK, it could not be and I'm just not sure how to test it). TIA, -- Jonathan ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to " [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" -- Jonathan M. Slivko - [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Linux: The Choice for the GNU Generation" - http://www.linux.org/ - Don't fear the penguin. .^. /V\ /( )\ ^^-^^ He's here to help. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- Jonathan M. Slivko - [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Linux: The Choice for the GNU Generation" - http://www.linux.org/ - Don't fear the penguin. .^. /V\ /( )\ ^^-^^ He's here to help. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: 3Ware SATA RAID 8000 - Supported on 5.3-R?
Yes, this is actually the autoboot fsck thats breaking, the one that is called from /etc/rc (via /etc/rc.d/). I can physically take the box down and do an offline fsck of it and that works fine, it's just when it's in multi-user mode thats the problem. -- Jonathan Franco Bruno Borghesi wrote: For fsck to work (to actually correct any problems you may have), partitions should be umounted first. Are you sure you have umounted /dev/twed before running fsck? 2005/5/24, Jonathan M. Slivko <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>: Hello, I have an interesting question, I have a Pentium 4 2.4Ghz (No HT Enabled), 2x80GB SATA Hard Drives in RAID 1. The box boots, works, etc. However, whenever you try and do an fsck -y, it says: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (~)% fsck -y ** /dev/twed0s1a (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on / ** Root file system ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups 2821 files, 31805 used, 474682 free (322 frags, 59295 blocks, 0.1% fragmentation) ** /dev/twed0s1g (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on /home ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups 82057 files, 557735 used, 12912399 free (2343 frags, 1613757 blocks, 0.0% fragmentation) ** /dev/twed0s1d (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on /tmp ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups 30 files, 1787 used, 504700 free (20 frags, 63085 blocks, 0.0% fragmentation) ** /dev/twed0s1e (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on /usr ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups 251160 files, 1318908 used, 13912410 free (73346 frags, 1729883 blocks, 0.5% fragmentation) ** /dev/twed0s1f (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on /var ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups 4424 files, 63321 used, 7042830 free (2462 frags, 880046 blocks, 0.0% fragmentation) The drives are Seagate SATA's (7200RPM) with a 3Ware SATA RAID Controller (8006-2LP) using the twe kernel driver. The drives themselves allow data to be read to/written from them, but fsck will not work (and is hanging things on boot). Anyone got any ideas? I looked at www.3ware.com <http://www.3ware.com> earlier and it says that the 8006-2LP's support FreeBSD 4.x, but not 5.x - could this be a result of that, seeing as otherwise the drives/RAID work fine (AFAIK, it could not be and I'm just not sure how to test it). TIA, -- Jonathan ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to " [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" -- Jonathan M. Slivko - [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Linux: The Choice for the GNU Generation" - http://www.linux.org/ - Don't fear the penguin. .^. /V\ /( )\ ^^-^^ He's here to help. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
3Ware SATA RAID 8000 - Supported on 5.3-R?
Hello, I have an interesting question, I have a Pentium 4 2.4Ghz (No HT Enabled), 2x80GB SATA Hard Drives in RAID 1. The box boots, works, etc. However, whenever you try and do an fsck -y, it says: [EMAIL PROTECTED](~)% fsck -y ** /dev/twed0s1a (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on / ** Root file system ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups 2821 files, 31805 used, 474682 free (322 frags, 59295 blocks, 0.1% fragmentation) ** /dev/twed0s1g (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on /home ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups 82057 files, 557735 used, 12912399 free (2343 frags, 1613757 blocks, 0.0% fragmentation) ** /dev/twed0s1d (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on /tmp ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups 30 files, 1787 used, 504700 free (20 frags, 63085 blocks, 0.0% fragmentation) ** /dev/twed0s1e (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on /usr ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups 251160 files, 1318908 used, 13912410 free (73346 frags, 1729883 blocks, 0.5% fragmentation) ** /dev/twed0s1f (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on /var ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups 4424 files, 63321 used, 7042830 free (2462 frags, 880046 blocks, 0.0% fragmentation) The drives are Seagate SATA's (7200RPM) with a 3Ware SATA RAID Controller (8006-2LP) using the twe kernel driver. The drives themselves allow data to be read to/written from them, but fsck will not work (and is hanging things on boot). Anyone got any ideas? I looked at www.3ware.com earlier and it says that the 8006-2LP's support FreeBSD 4.x, but not 5.x - could this be a result of that, seeing as otherwise the drives/RAID work fine (AFAIK, it could not be and I'm just not sure how to test it). TIA, -- Jonathan ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: downloading entire directories
Hmmm could you possibly try rsync? Also, I believe that ncftp has a recursive (-R) option in it that would allow you to download all of the files in a given directory structure. I'm not sure if thats what your looking for. HTH, -- Jonathan On Fri, May 20, 2005 5:10 pm, Eugene Hercun said: > I was wondering if ftp is able to download entire directories. I've > read through the man page and didn't really find anything specific to > downloading a selected directory. There was a note however, saying to > use tar to tar a directory and then download that tar file. The > problem is I do not have remote access to this particular ftp server. > The only alternative that I could think of using is wget. Although I > would prefer to use ftp. > Thank you. > This is for a perl script to basically check an ftp server every day, > download what's new, and add the new items to a database to not > download the same items again the next day. > > Eugene > ___ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: HD problems after power outage
With all the events of September 11th, one would think we'd have learned about backups by now :) -- Jonathan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Seaman Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 5:09 PM To: backdoc Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: HD problems after power outage On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 03:36:21PM -0600, backdoc wrote: > I lost power at my house for a moment this morning which is causing > some problems with my second hard drive. [ fsck tale of woe...] > I try to rerun fsck, but this pattern only repeats. Is there a way to > fix this?? Or, am I toast? Toasted to a nice golden brown on both sides. You've had a head crash on that second drive, which has created a scratch right across a number of disk sectors. Time to chuck that disk in the bin and restore your backups[1] onto a new one. Cheers, Matthew [1] You *do* have backups, don't you? -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: 3ware Serial ATA 8506-8
Did you compile a custom 2.4.23 kernel with it? -- Jonathan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Tancsa Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 3:10 PM To: Jonathan M. Slivko Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 3ware Serial ATA 8506-8 At 03:07 PM 04/01/2004, Jonathan M. Slivko wrote: >If it's anything like 3Ware's support for RedHat 9, then I don't want >it (since custom kernels choke on the 3Ware driver on boot) :) Strange, I have had good results with the 3ware on LINUX as well. The driver for FreeBSD for the most part seems still based on the original by [EMAIL PROTECTED] and continued on by Paul Saab ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). There are also additional tools released that are handy for rebuilding hot-spares. ---Mike ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: 3ware Serial ATA 8506-8
If it's anything like 3Ware's support for RedHat 9, then I don't want it (since custom kernels choke on the 3Ware driver on boot) :) -- Jonathan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Tancsa Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 3:00 PM To: jr315 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 3ware Serial ATA 8506-8 It should. I am using a 8006-2 right now in the lab. 3ware has also launched official support for FreeBSD on their webpage. ---Mike On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 07:08:01 -0800 (PST), in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions you wrote: > > >Does Anyone Know if 3Ware SATA 8506-8 Raid Controller Works with >FreeBSD 4.9 Release??? > >__ >Do you Yahoo!? >Find out what made the Top Yahoo! Searches of 2003 >http://search.yahoo.com/top2003 >___ >[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: hard drive test
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David, You can try and run distributed.net on it for awhile - that should give it a pretty good workout. - -- Jonathan === Jonathan M. Slivko ISP/Marketing PeeringSolutions, LLC === PeeringSolutions, LLC 90 Morningside Drive, Suite 4H New York, NY 10027 vox: 646.245.7286 fax: 212.663.1109 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] info: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.peeringsolutions.ca/ TAC: http://my.peeringsolutions.ca/ === - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Bear Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 10:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: hard drive test i just installed 4.9-rel. after having the system on for about two hours I got a console message that device ad0 had timed out. then the system froze. after a reboot (power off then on) the systems has been working fine. The HD is standard seagate barracuda ATA drive (30 gig). I am using an ata100 cable. now I'm nervous. don't know why the drive would have had the error. Are there any freebsd utils that I can use to test the drive? - -- David Bear phone: 480-965-8257 fax:480-965-9189 College of Public Programs/ASU Wilson Hall 232 Tempe, AZ 85287-0803 "Beware the IP portfolio, everyone will be suspect of trespassing" ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 8.0.3 iQA/AwUBP/JDNU96BXDwEhNnEQJCMgCeLggG/3qIX/rKQBRnr8DaNR1BMQIAoMgv lofYDFEN8+sbKxHzyepCZ0Gt =3MQA -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Most likely what you are seeing is FearBSD.ORG or something similar to FreeBSD.org, because there are a few copycat domains owned by various shell companies. Unless you are talking about Freenode, which has a lot of FreeBSD developers and so on, so they may be chatting from the FreeBSD cluster. - -- Jonathan === Jonathan M. Slivko ISP/Marketing PeeringSolutions, LLC === PeeringSolutions, LLC 90 Morningside Drive, Suite 4H New York, NY 10027 vox: 646.245.7286 fax: 212.663.1109 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] info: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.peeringsolutions.ca/ === - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of sARah Sent: Friday, December 26, 2003 12:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: hey, i'd like to ask.. how do i make the ip's for Mirc cuz i've bEen noticing that quite a number of the chatters using the ip from freebsd.com.. hope u can tell me how to do it? thanks ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 8.0.3 iQA/AwUBP+xF7HsJYQ6bkgdREQKwhwCgl/NLbXr9ywlUj/QDQNc1IsNqLTQAnR3o vGO2RW/SNfcOW+0ZdXjqGean =awX0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: hurry and help with installing ports through http proxy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Start up /stand/sysinstall, go to Post-Install, Options and then set your network settings there. - -- Jonathan === Jonathan M. Slivko ISP/Marketing PeeringSolutions, LLC === PeeringSolutions, LLC 90 Morningside Drive, Suite 4H New York, NY 10027 vox: 646.245.7286 fax: 212.663.1109 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] info: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.peeringsolutions.ca/ === - -Original Message- From: Dino Vliet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 3:39 PM To: Jonathan M. Slivko Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: hurry and help with installing ports through http proxy No I'm not! Do you know how to what to edit (eg where to put the line prxyserver:port) in order to let the ports being fetched through that proxyserver and port? - --- "Jonathan M. Slivko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > You are aware that you can install ports from a > remote location via > SSH, right? :) > > - -- Jonathan > > === > Jonathan M. Slivko > ISP/Marketing > PeeringSolutions, LLC > === > PeeringSolutions, LLC > 90 Morningside Drive, Suite 4H > New York, NY 10027 > vox: 646.245.7286 > fax: 212.663.1109 > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > info: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > web: http://www.peeringsolutions.ca/ > === > > - -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Dino Vliet > Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 3:31 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: hurry and help with installing ports > through http proxy > > Hi there, > > I just finished installing freebsd 4.9. > In sysinstall I had to give my proxy adress and it > went smooth. > > But now when I try to do a make install clean > at a port I get this error message telling me it > can't > connect to the sources (ftp servers) > > I think I have to tell to the ports program it has > to > use my proxy address. > The question is, > where do I have to do this? > > Please hurry because otherwise the campus will > close..:-) > > Brgds > > > __ > Do you Yahoo!? > New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. > http://photos.yahoo.com/ > ___ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: PGP 8.0.3 > > iQA/AwUBP+Ng0096BXDwEhNnEQJmnQCcDV1WjH7RDAiBPuchsDFmO5vDXRYAoJQB > Zk18U5zQu4WodgcycwUSllJX > =DX6U > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > __ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 8.0.3 iQA/AwUBP+NjUE96BXDwEhNnEQLVMwCgq+WOALrkDGXQANnXhoPlkQx8DzcAn2a9 jn0knMRXOY1HESb5C8WJKfIc =HKEa -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
