Re: What logs etc do I need to checkfrequently?

2003-12-29 Thread Jerry McAllister
> 
> As you with good memories know, I lost 3000 pictures of my first sons
> first year this month. I did have a RAID-5 system with fresh disks,
> however, shit happens and I have a feeling that this could have been
> avoided if I read my log files better.
> 

As has been mentioned, if you have critical or irreplaceable data, back 
it up.If your partitions are too large for any backup system you
can use, then make a scheme for breaking the data in to more manageable
sized partitions - use more partitions and even more slices and disk
devices if needed.   Those huge raid partitions are nice for some
things, but have their drawbacks.   

You can get backup devices - LTO and high end DLT that hold up to 160
or more uncompressed, so that is a good single sized partition.  They
are expensive, but not compared to losing your data.

Also, you are supposed to be able to use more than one tape in a backup.
I don't know how well that works in FreeBSD dump/restore.  I don't have
a big enough disk under FreeBSD to make it go to more than one tape yet.
But, I have successfully dumped partitions that needed up to 10 DAT tapes
before on other UNIX systems.  

jerry

> So basically, 
> 
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: What logs etc do I need to checkfrequently?

2003-12-28 Thread Chuck Swiger
Joachim Dagerot wrote:
[ ... ]
I realise you are right. The thing is that this is a home system and I
have (had!) around 230 GB of data that was non-replicable. I am not
aware of a deasent backup system that can handle that amount of data.
There are three main alternatives:

1) hard drives -- get another HD or two and back up all data from your main 
filesystem daily via cron (perhaps locally, perhaps to a second machine); very 
cheap but iffy reliability...more of a "hot spare" solution than a true backup 
solution, but reasonably effective.

2) DVD burner -- cheap, limited media capacity but you can burn 20-odd DVD's 
(modulo achieved compression ratio) in a sane amount of time

3) tape-- main candidates are probably sDLT (up to 320GB per tape capacity) or 
maybe Ultrium (LTO?)...expensive (~ $3000+), best reliability by far, and best 
support for incremental backups to conserve media costs

--
-Chuck
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: What logs etc do I need to checkfrequently?

2003-12-28 Thread Scott W
Chuck Swiger wrote:

Joachim Dagerot wrote:

As you with good memories know, I lost 3000 pictures of my first sons
first year this month. I did have a RAID-5 system with fresh disks,
however, shit happens and I have a feeling that this could have been
avoided if I read my log files better.


I'm sorry that you lost data.

While you may have been able to notice the problem with the RAID-5 array 
in time to do something, what you ought to do to avoid losing more data 
sometime in the future involves making good backups-- not poring over 
the system log files, not configuring RAID.

So basically,
a) I get a mail each time my a cron-event fires, this happens every 30
min so the mailbox are quite loaded, not very funny going through.


If you can, change the cron task to not generate output unless there is 
a problem that you should know about.  Failing that, append "> /dev/null 
2>&1" to the line in your crontab, which will discard the output, 
meaning you won't get mail from cron.

a1) Is it possible to only get a mail with critical information, where
and what do I need to do to achieve this?


My comments above should help you reduce the amount of junk mail you get 
from cron.

b1) Where will information about ongoing disk-problems appear?  How can
I see that there is a flaky disk in a non-rebooted system?


/var/log/messages.  The system will complain quite noticably in the face 
of hardware errors, and should log one or more lines for every bad 
sector it runs into.

On the other hand, depending on the hard drive to fail gradually is 
risky: hard drives can fail catestrophically without giving significant 
warning. Some failure modes-- stiction in particular-- can sometimes be 
worked around on a temporary basis long enough to recover data without 
heroic measures (ie, paying a data recovery company a few grand).

It's important to realize that while RAID modes which provide 
fault-tolerance do improve availability (ie, they can save your data if 
a drive goes), RAID is not a substitute for backups.  In particular, 
RAID-5 or RAID-1 doesn't help a bit if someone deletes or overwrites a 
file

In addition to the questions above, is there something else I need to
tune/install/setup/configurare to get a very reliable system that
report critical data to me but where non-critical data is filtered
out?


/etc/syslog.conf defines the configuration of system logging, and it is 
worth reviewing that to understand what is being logged and where.

Just to add my .02c here- all of the above is excellent advise, and I 
think someone else already mentioned logcheck, which can be useful for 
other thins as well (port scanning, Nimda attacks (which are STILL out 
there), and others)I guess my only disagreement here is about RAID 
or disk vs tape backups.  At this point, it's generally more inexpensive 
 to buy a secondary disk, or even a RAID setup. than to go with tape. 
Tape itself isn't a guaranteed medium by any means...meaning there have 
been times I've gone to backup from tape to then find out it was a less 
than full backup or data was corrupted on the tape.  I won't even get 
into tape drive issues where you write data on one unit and a different 
tape drive won't read the same tapes, other than to say it happens.

If you've got data that doesn't change often (ie like your pictures), 
and only grows, you've got a few options:

1.  Set up a RAID-5 array.  IMPORTANT- designate at least one hot spare!
If your main use is for backup, you can go with an older SCSI solution, 
but if so, I _highly_ recommend using a RAID enclosure (with backplane, 
not a 'homemade' cabled setup- older SCSI (scsi2, UW, etc) is pretty 
picky about cable length, and using an external cabled enclosure can 
cause read or write errors and other issues (dropping a drive offline). 
 Fiber channel or older scsi hardware RAID solutions can be had on eBay 
for pennies on the dollar right now..  Note that I'm talking about 
hardware RAID here...software RAID is slower (generally), and IMHO just 
not as reliable...yet.

You can use the setup as a 'live data logical drive,' and if you're 
overly paranoid, do a scheduled tar archive (or other means of backup, 
but with tar you can add the incrementals to your archive) to the 
drives, or to an alternate drive, as well.

2.  Buy a secondary IDE disk, sized at least 2x the size of your data to 
allow for growth.  Do NOT use this drive for anything other than backup, 
eg mount the drive as /backup and only use it for (cronned) data dumps. 
 You'll only be writing and reading to the drive occasionally, and as 
such, you should have a reasonably decent length of time the drive will 
work for, meaning it's likely to get replaced during upgrades years from 
now before the drive itself fails.  Large IDE disks are getting insanely 
inexpensive...

DLT drives in the 15gb(uncompressed) range are < $100, but as usual, 
become progressively more expensive as you go larger in size, woth a 
40gb running ~$300

Re: What logs etc do I need to checkfrequently?

2003-12-27 Thread Chuck Swiger
Joachim Dagerot wrote:
As you with good memories know, I lost 3000 pictures of my first sons
first year this month. I did have a RAID-5 system with fresh disks,
however, shit happens and I have a feeling that this could have been
avoided if I read my log files better.
I'm sorry that you lost data.

While you may have been able to notice the problem with the RAID-5 array in 
time to do something, what you ought to do to avoid losing more data sometime 
in the future involves making good backups-- not poring over the system log 
files, not configuring RAID.

So basically, 

a) I get a mail each time my a cron-event fires, this happens every 30
min so the mailbox are quite loaded, not very funny going through.
If you can, change the cron task to not generate output unless there is a 
problem that you should know about.  Failing that, append "> /dev/null 2>&1" 
to the line in your crontab, which will discard the output, meaning you won't 
get mail from cron.

a1) Is it possible to only get a mail with critical information, where
and what do I need to do to achieve this?
My comments above should help you reduce the amount of junk mail you get from 
cron.

b1) Where will information about ongoing disk-problems appear?  How can
I see that there is a flaky disk in a non-rebooted system?
/var/log/messages.  The system will complain quite noticably in the face of 
hardware errors, and should log one or more lines for every bad sector it runs 
into.

On the other hand, depending on the hard drive to fail gradually is risky: 
hard drives can fail catestrophically without giving significant warning. 
Some failure modes-- stiction in particular-- can sometimes be worked around 
on a temporary basis long enough to recover data without heroic measures (ie, 
paying a data recovery company a few grand).

It's important to realize that while RAID modes which provide fault-tolerance 
do improve availability (ie, they can save your data if a drive goes), RAID is 
not a substitute for backups.  In particular, RAID-5 or RAID-1 doesn't help a 
bit if someone deletes or overwrites a file

In addition to the questions above, is there something else I need to
tune/install/setup/configurare to get a very reliable system that
report critical data to me but where non-critical data is filtered
out?
/etc/syslog.conf defines the configuration of system logging, and it is worth 
reviewing that to understand what is being logged and where.

--
-Chuck
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: What logs etc do I need to checkfrequently?

2003-12-27 Thread MikeM
On 12/27/2003 at 7:40 PM Joachim Dagerot wrote:

|As you with good memories know, I lost 3000 pictures of my first sons
|first year this month. I did have a RAID-5 system with fresh disks,
|however, shit happens and I have a feeling that this could have been
|avoided if I read my log files better.
|
|So basically, 
|
|a) I get a mail each time my a cron-event fires, this happens every 30
|min so the mailbox are quite loaded, not very funny going through.
|
|b) The file messages contained information that my raid-system was
|about to blow, I didn't see this because I never read that file. Also
|it appears to only log information after a reboot.
|The vinum history file seems to only hold information about the vinum
|setup, not the health of the volumes.
|
|Questions:
|
|a1) Is it possible to only get a mail with critical information, where
|and what do I need to do to achieve this?

/usr/ports/security/logcheck





___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


What logs etc do I need to checkfrequently?

2003-12-27 Thread Joachim Dagerot
As you with good memories know, I lost 3000 pictures of my first sons
first year this month. I did have a RAID-5 system with fresh disks,
however, shit happens and I have a feeling that this could have been
avoided if I read my log files better.

So basically, 

a) I get a mail each time my a cron-event fires, this happens every 30
min so the mailbox are quite loaded, not very funny going through.

b) The file messages contained information that my raid-system was
about to blow, I didn't see this because I never read that file. Also
it appears to only log information after a reboot.
The vinum history file seems to only hold information about the vinum
setup, not the health of the volumes.

Questions:

a1) Is it possible to only get a mail with critical information, where
and what do I need to do to achieve this?

b1) Where will information about ongoing disk-problems appear? How can
I see that there is a flaky disk in a non-rebooted system?


In addition to the questions above, is there something else I need to
tune/install/setup/configurare to get a very reliable system that
report critical data to me but where non-critical data is filtered
out?

Thank in advance, my FreeBSD setup is getting more and more mature
now, only thanks to this list.

Regards,
Joachim
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"