Re: Port devel/pear
On 14 Aug 2002, Simon Dick wrote: > On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 08:19, Eugene wrote: > > Evgueni V. Gavrilov([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2002.08.14 13:37:14 +: > > > Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:37:14 +0700 > > > From: "Evgueni V. Gavrilov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020813 > > > X-Accept-Language: ru, en > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: Port devel/pear > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >Port devel/pear is now forbidden by the reason "This module is now part > > > >of mod_php4 as of 4.1.0". But, as I noticed, mod_php4 port doesn't > > > >install pear. > > > > > > > >How can I install port devel/pear? > > > perl -pi -e 's/^FORBIDDEN.*//' Makefile > > > > > > > It is clear that remove FORBIDDEN line is enough, but I guess people want > > to have a legal way to install pear. > > Strange how all the mod_php4 installs I've done since 4.0.6 at least > have included pear, you may want to actually look to make sure you don't > have it. the latest php4 distribution comes with a reduced set of PEAR ... as is very evident when you try and install/run horde with it :( The PEAR port is required if you want to do anything with Horde ... To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Sonic DP83916 NIC
Hello all, maybe my question is somewhat off-topic, but anyway... I have a very old (10 years old!) ISA Ethernet NIC, made by Tulip Computers using National Sonic DP83916 (SONIC-16) chipset. My colleague was going to drop it away as some kind of crap, but I'd like to put it into use. The only problem I don't know what driver to use, LINT didn't help, and I have some bad feeling that this NIC isn't supported by FreeBSD at all. Any help? Rhett __ Do You Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs http://www.hotjobs.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
RE: uname reports 4.6-STABLE not 4.6.2-STABLE?
Ah, yes. *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_4 Thanks for the explanation/reminder Brooks. --Morgan > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brooks Davis > Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 7:03 PM > To: Morgan Davis > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: uname reports 4.6-STABLE not 4.6.2-STABLE? > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 06:58:49PM -0700, Morgan Davis wrote: > > Is it normal for uname to not report the tertiary version number in the > > STABLE branch? It's been so long since we had a three digit release > > revision I can't recall. > > > > In the event it is normal, is there a way to determine the .2 > > maintenance level? Even /usr/src/UPDATING doesn't seem to have a line > > in there about the 4.6.2 RELEASE date. > > 4.6.2 is a snapshot of RELENG_4_6, the 4.6 security fix branch, not a > snapshot of RELENG_4, the 4.x branch so if you track RELENG_4, you won't > ever run 4.6.2. > > -- Brooks > > -- > Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. > PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
syscons & LCDs...
Hi, all-- Assuming a RELENG-4.6 system with the following kernel options: options VESA options SC_PIXEL_MODE ...how can you best optimize the syscons display for a LCD with a native resolution of 1280x1024? Here's an excerpt of 'vidcontrol -i': fb0: vga0, type:VESA VGA (5), flags:0x700ff initial mode:24, current mode:258, BIOS mode:3 frame buffer window:0xa, buffer size:0x40 window size:0x1, origin:0x0 display start address (0, 0), scan line width:100 reserved:0x0 mode# flags typesize font window linear buffer -- 0 (0x000) 0x0001 T 40x25 8x8 0xb8000 32k 32k 0x 32k 1 (0x001) 0x0001 T 40x25 8x8 0xb8000 32k 32k 0x 32k 2 (0x002) 0x0001 T 80x25 8x8 0xb8000 32k 32k 0x 32k 3 (0x003) 0x0001 T 80x25 8x8 0xb8000 32k 32k 0x 32k [ ... ] 24 (0x018) 0x0001 T 80x25 8x16 0xb8000 32k 32k 0x 32k [ ... ] 256 (0x100) 0x000f G 640x400x8 1 8x16 0xa 64k 64k 0xfc00 4096k 257 (0x101) 0x000f G 640x480x8 1 8x16 0xa 64k 64k 0xfc00 4096k 258 (0x102) 0x000b G 800x600x4 4 8x16 0xa 64k 64k 0x 4096k 259 (0x103) 0x000f G 800x600x8 1 8x16 0xa 64k 64k 0xfc00 4096k 260 (0x104) 0x000b G 1024x768x4 48x16 0xa 64k 64k 0x 4096k 261 (0x105) 0x000f G 1024x768x8 18x16 0xa 64k 64k 0xfc00 4096k 262 (0x106) 0x000b G 1280x1024x4 4 8x16 0xa 64k 64k 0x 4096k 263 (0x107) 0x000f G 1280x1024x8 1 8x16 0xa 64k 64k 0xfc00 4096k [ ... ] 331 (0x14b) 0x000f G 720x480x16 18x16 0xa 64k 64k 0xfc00 4096k 332 (0x14c) 0x000f G 720x576x16 18x16 0xa 64k 64k 0xfc00 4096k I've gotten as far as using 800x600, as that interpolates better than the 720x480 resolution it seemed to default to (80x25, I guess). I'd really prefer to drive it at the native resolution instead, however...aka mode 263. If my best bet is to install X11, I guess I'll bite the bullet and do so, but I'd really prefer to use text-based consoles if I still can. -Chuck PS: If the hardware details help, the LCD is a ViewSonic VX900, and here's "dmesg": Copyright (c) 1992-2002 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.6.2-RELEASE #7: Fri Aug 16 20:57:43 EDT 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SEC Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Pentium II/Pentium II Xeon/Celeron (300.01-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x634 Stepping = 4 Features=0x80f9ff real memory = 201326592 (196608K bytes) avail memory = 192036864 (187536K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc03ae000. VESA: v3.0, 4096k memory, flags:0x1, mode table:0xc0345482 (122) VESA: STB Velocity 128 (RIVA 128) Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled md0: Malloc disk Using $PIR table, 8 entries at 0xc00fdf40 npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at 0.0 irq 11 [ ... ] vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa-0xb on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> I can swap in another video card if it would make a difference. (It's been hot here in NYC, and the RIVA 128 doesn't even need a heatsink.) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: uname reports 4.6-STABLE not 4.6.2-STABLE?
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 06:58:49PM -0700, Morgan Davis wrote: > Is it normal for uname to not report the tertiary version number in the > STABLE branch? It's been so long since we had a three digit release > revision I can't recall. > > In the event it is normal, is there a way to determine the .2 > maintenance level? Even /usr/src/UPDATING doesn't seem to have a line > in there about the 4.6.2 RELEASE date. 4.6.2 is a snapshot of RELENG_4_6, the 4.6 security fix branch, not a snapshot of RELENG_4, the 4.x branch so if you track RELENG_4, you won't ever run 4.6.2. -- Brooks -- Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 msg48785/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
uname reports 4.6-STABLE not 4.6.2-STABLE?
Just made/installed world after a cvsup yesterday. Is it normal for uname to not report the tertiary version number in the STABLE branch? It's been so long since we had a three digit release revision I can't recall. In the event it is normal, is there a way to determine the .2 maintenance level? Even /usr/src/UPDATING doesn't seem to have a line in there about the 4.6.2 RELEASE date. --Morgan Davis To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: "filesystem is full" during installation of 4.6.2-REL
Yeah, after all it's pretty simple. The "Restart" thing in sysinstall is a gross hack and doesn't really work. You should have mentionned the restart issue in the beginning though, it would have clarified a lot of things. :) Maybe you could open a pr about this? A. On Fri Aug 16, 2002 at 10:40:37PM +0100, Andrew Boothman wrote: > Antoine Beaupre wrote: > > >FWIW, I've had such problems with restarted sysinstalls. In fact, a > >lot of the recent uses I had of sysinstall ended up with such an error. > > > >I think it is due to sysinstall not correctly mounting the configured > >file systems. The behavior is quite erratic and i haven't been able to > >pinpoint the exact problem but restarting the install, reformating the > >partitions works usually ok. > > It looks like this is exactly what was happening. > > Everytime I tried to install, the DNS lookup on ftp.uk.freebsd.org would > timeout the first time round (a seperate problem), and I needed to > restart the installation each time. After going through the whole > process several times, the DNS lookup worked first time round and the > installation went without issue. > > It looks like sysinstall does get confused when asked to restart an > installation. > > Many thanks to all who helped out. > > Andrew. > -- Imagination is more important than knowledge - Albert Einstein msg48781/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Compiling gnome2, gconf-editor compile error
On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, sammy!!! wrote: > I get the following error when trying to compile gnome2, specifically > gconf-editor: > > In file included from gconf-bookmarks.c:25: > /usr/X11R6/include/gtk-2.0/gtk/gtkimage.h:85: syntax error before > `GdkPixbufAnimationIter' > > Anyone know what's I need to update on my system? You have some old directories lingering about in /usr/X11R6/include and/or /usr/local/include. If you send me the ls -l output of those directories, I can tell you which ones to remove. Joe > > sammy! > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: Installing on ATI video card laptop
On Tuesday 13 August 2002 05:37 pm, Chris BeHanna wrote: | On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Andrea Monaldi wrote: | > Hi All, | > | > I am trying to install 4.6 release on a Compaq laptop | > with an ATI Rage Mobility video card. | > | > It seems there's no driver at all for the ATI familiy. | > Is it true? | | No, it's not true. Works great for me on an HP OmniBook 4150B. | I'm using XFree86 4.2, FYI. And on my Dell as well. But it *is* true that X -configure doesn't work. I recommend checking the "Linux for Laptops" page and finding somebody with the same machine and getting an XF86Config from there. I send you mine if you want, but it's only right if you have a 1400x1050 display. And I have an ATI RAGE Mobility 128, too, which uses a different driver (mg?) from the usual one (ati?). I'm being lazy and going on memory here. -- Brian, the man from Babble-On . . . . [EMAIL PROTECTED] (personal) http://www.babbleon.org http://www.eff.org http://www.programming-freedom.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Compiling gnome2, gconf-editor compile error
I get the following error when trying to compile gnome2, specifically gconf-editor: In file included from gconf-bookmarks.c:25: /usr/X11R6/include/gtk-2.0/gtk/gtkimage.h:85: syntax error before `GdkPixbufAnimationIter' Anyone know what's I need to update on my system? sammy! To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: ppp stable 4.6.2
I have had no problems, can you be more specific? sammy On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, Kliment Andreev wrote: > Hi, > > I had a problem running DSL, PPPoE with 4.6-stable. I know that something > was changed in PPP files from 4.5. Is it fixed in 4.6.2-stable? > > Thank you, > Kliment Andreev > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: 4.6.2-RELEASE and KRB5
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 01:36:17PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > You'll have to merge the following revision manually. Or should I be merging > it onto RELENG_4_6? REs? This is approved for RELENG_4_6. Can you send us an errata entry? Thanks. - Murray To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: "filesystem is full" during installation of 4.6.2-REL
Antoine Beaupre wrote: > FWIW, I've had such problems with restarted sysinstalls. In fact, a > lot of the recent uses I had of sysinstall ended up with such an error. > > I think it is due to sysinstall not correctly mounting the configured > file systems. The behavior is quite erratic and i haven't been able to > pinpoint the exact problem but restarting the install, reformating the > partitions works usually ok. It looks like this is exactly what was happening. Everytime I tried to install, the DNS lookup on ftp.uk.freebsd.org would timeout the first time round (a seperate problem), and I needed to restart the installation each time. After going through the whole process several times, the DNS lookup worked first time round and the installation went without issue. It looks like sysinstall does get confused when asked to restart an installation. Many thanks to all who helped out. Andrew. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Re: "filesystem is full" during installation of 4.6.2-REL
On Friday, August 16, 2002, at 01:40 PM, Andrew Boothman wrote: > Scott M. Nolde wrote: > >> Andrew Boothman([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2002.08.16 03:12:25 + >> >>> However, during an FTP install from ftp.uk.freebsd.org when it >>> reaches 'chunk 4' the system displays a message saying "Write failure >>> on transfer (wrote -1 bytes of 240260 bytes)" and "/: write failed, >>> filesystem is full" >>> >>> VTY1 shows : >>> . >>> . >>> bin/ls >>> bin/mkdev >>> bin/mv >>> pid 72 (cpio), uid 0 on /: filesystem is full >>> /stand/cpio: write error: No space left on drive >>> /stand/gunzip: failed fwrite >>> >>> A quick /stand/df on VTY4 shows 101% capacity on /dev/md0c mounted >>> on / but just 1% capacity on /dev/ad0s1a mounted on /mnt. I've never >>> delved this far into a sysinstall installation before, but it sounds >>> like it is failing on unpacking files into a memory disk? What could >>> have caused this problem >>> >> md0c is a memory disk and you're not actually writing to your hard >> drive, >> which would be ad0 or ad1. >> > Hmmm. Thats exactly what I thought. What does sysinstall use the memory > disk for? To uncompress the MFSROOT floppy, which contains the sysinstall script. In other words, sysinstall and friends are not ran straight from the floppy, but from a filesystem installed in the RAM of your machine (or so to speak), to which the kernel copies sysinstall before running it. > Is this the same memory disk contained on the mfsroot floppy? Yes. The memory disk contains the uncompressed mfsroot.gz file. > In which case why is it trying to unpack more files there? Probably because he wasn't able to mount your disk on /mnt, so /mnt ends up being on md0c instead of ad0a. A. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
