Re: Problems with auditd -- resolved
Robert Watson wrote: Dear all, I've just comitted a fix to syscalls.master and regenerated the remaining system call files, which should correct the auditctl: Invalid Argument error being returned by auditd. In short order, this fix should be on the cvsup mirrors -- please let me know if it resolves the problem you were experiencing. Hi, After installing and running auditd I don't see any log files for auditd: daemon# ls -l /var/audit/ total 0 -r--r- 1 root audit 0 Sep 18 14:23 20060918052316.20060918060339 -r--r- 1 root audit 0 Sep 18 15:03 20060918060339.not_terminated I have custom /etc/security/audit_control and audit_user files. daemon# more /etc/security/audit_control # # $P4: //depot/projects/trustedbsd/openbsm/etc/audit_control#3 $ # $FreeBSD: src/contrib/openbsm/etc/audit_control,v 1.2.2.1 2006/09/02 10:46:00 rwatson Exp $ # dir:/var/audit flags:all minfree:20 naflags:lo # # $P4: //depot/projects/trustedbsd/openbsm/etc/audit_user#3 $ # $FreeBSD: src/contrib/openbsm/etc/audit_user,v 1.2.2.1 2006/09/02 10:46:00 rwatson Exp $ # #root:lo:no root:all:no I'm bit confused here I thought auditd should log all activities, but I don't see any log files. Am I doing something wrong here or my understanding regarding auditd is wrong? thanks in advance, Ganbold Thanks, Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ath0 weak connectivity
Hi, Has anyone experienced problems with ath0 giving bad connectivity on 6.1-STABLE? My wireless card reported as Atheros 5212 rapidly loses connectivity if I move it more than 2-3 meters away from the access point, but the same notebook connects well from under windows. I tried both kernel with both old device ath_rate_sample and ath_rate_onoe, tried to play with AP's settings, changed transmit rate and beacon interval, nothing helps. One interesting thing though is that ifconfig ath0 scan reports my station as configured to 119ms beacon interval, while it is set to 100ms actually. Anything else I can try? -- Sincerely, Dmitry Karasik ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problems with auditd -- resolved
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006, Ganbold wrote: # # $P4: //depot/projects/trustedbsd/openbsm/etc/audit_user#3 $ # $FreeBSD: src/contrib/openbsm/etc/audit_user,v 1.2.2.1 2006/09/02 10:46:00 rwatson Exp $ # #root:lo:no root:all:no I'm bit confused here I thought auditd should log all activities, but I don't see any log files. Am I doing something wrong here or my understanding regarding auditd is wrong? Your configuration looks right to me, and should be generating a ridiculous number of audit records. Could you try rebooting and logging in again? audit_user entries take effect only as of login, similar to /etc/group settings, etc. How are you logging into the system? On my local RELENG_6 system, with the recent auditctl(2) fix, I'm using the following global settings to audit programs run by authenticated users: dir:/var/audit flags:lo,+ex minfree:20 naflags:lo It seems to be working properly. User space login/logout auditing won't work in RELENG_6 until the MFC of Christian's recent tweaks to pipe preselection, which will occurr in a few days (and hence should appear in BETA2). Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problems with auditd -- resolved
Robert Watson wrote: On Mon, 18 Sep 2006, Ganbold wrote: # # $P4: //depot/projects/trustedbsd/openbsm/etc/audit_user#3 $ # $FreeBSD: src/contrib/openbsm/etc/audit_user,v 1.2.2.1 2006/09/02 10:46:00 rwatson Exp $ # #root:lo:no root:all:no I'm bit confused here I thought auditd should log all activities, but I don't see any log files. Am I doing something wrong here or my understanding regarding auditd is wrong? Your configuration looks right to me, and should be generating a ridiculous number of audit records. Could you try rebooting and logging in again? audit_user entries take effect only as of login, similar to /etc/group settings, etc. How are you logging into the system? This is my desktop system and I updated today to latest RELENG_6. daemon# uname -an FreeBSD daemon.micom.mng.net 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #6: Mon Sep 18 12:56:04 ULAST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GDAEMON i386 I tried to restart several times auditd using /etc/rc.d/auditd script. daemon# /etc/rc.d/auditd restart Trigger sent. Starting auditd. daemon# /etc/rc.d/auditd restart Trigger sent. auditd already running? (pid=2065). daemon# /etc/rc.d/auditd restart Error sending trigger: Operation not supported by device Starting auditd. daemon# /etc/rc.d/auditd restart Trigger sent. auditd already running? (pid=2095). daemon# /etc/rc.d/auditd restart Error sending trigger: Operation not supported by device Starting auditd. daemon# /etc/rc.d/auditd restart Trigger sent. Starting auditd. daemon# ps ax | grep audit 10 ?? DL 0:00.00 [audit_worker] 2141 ?? Ss 0:00.01 /usr/sbin/auditd 2143 p3 RV 0:00.00 grep audit (csh) daemon# ps ax | grep audit 10 ?? DL 0:00.00 [audit_worker] 2141 ?? Ss 0:00.01 /usr/sbin/auditd Strange, there are still no logs in /var/audit dir :( Even tried to use your config, no success. However when I logged on to my desktop from console to itself (ssh -l tsgan localhost) it starts logging. But why it is not logging when I'm on console? On my local RELENG_6 system, with the recent auditctl(2) fix, I'm using the following global settings to audit programs run by authenticated users: dir:/var/audit flags:lo,+ex minfree:20 naflags:lo It seems to be working properly. User space login/logout auditing won't work in RELENG_6 until the MFC of Christian's recent tweaks to pipe preselection, which will occurr in a few days (and hence should appear in BETA2). I see. thanks, Ganbold Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problems with auditd -- resolved
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006, Ganbold wrote: Strange, there are still no logs in /var/audit dir :( Even tried to use your config, no success. However when I logged on to my desktop from console to itself (ssh -l tsgan localhost) it starts logging. But why it is not logging when I'm on console? Are you using xdm/kdm/gdm/etc or /usr/bin/login? I'm not sure that the various GUI login managers associated with X11 ship with BSM support compiled in by default, although given that they also run on Solaris, it is likely they support it. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ARRRRGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?!
Michael Abbott wrote: Roland Smith wrote: Martin Nilsson wrote: Hans Lambermont wrote: .. or just stop calling it STABLE and call it RELENG_6 instead That's a good idea, IMHO. When I started with FreeBSD I found the difference between the branch names and cvs tags confusing. Let me second that. I hadn't realised that STABLE==RELENG_n (where n is the current version number) until very recently, and I've seen the STABLE isn't stable thing crop up over and over again over the last few years, both on mailing lists and IRC. Actually, FreeBSD has three types of branches: - current a.k.a. HEAD - X-stable a.k.a. RELENG_X - X.Y security branch a.k.a. RELENG_X_Y I think it would be better to rename the 2nd one RELENG (instead of STABLE), because that's exactly what it is: the release-engineering branch from which the releases are derived. The term STABLE would be much better suitable for the 3rd type of branches which are currently called security branches. Thus we would have: - current - releng - stable Then the names match exactly what the branches are: current is the current head of experimental development, releng is the release engineering branch, and stable is the stable branch for people who want to track only security fixes and the most critical stuff. Such appropriate naming would certainly prevent a lot of confusion. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing Dienstleistungen mit Schwerpunkt FreeBSD: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. The last good thing written in C was Franz Schubert's Symphony number 9. -- Erwin Dieterich ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problems with auditd -- resolved
Robert Watson wrote: On Mon, 18 Sep 2006, Ganbold wrote: Strange, there are still no logs in /var/audit dir :( Even tried to use your config, no success. However when I logged on to my desktop from console to itself (ssh -l tsgan localhost) it starts logging. But why it is not logging when I'm on console? Are you using xdm/kdm/gdm/etc or /usr/bin/login? I'm not sure that the various GUI login managers associated with X11 ship with BSM support compiled in by default, although given that they also run on Solaris, it is likely they support it. Ok, I'm using gnome and gnome-terminal, and it is not logging. Probably gnome-terminal is not compiled with BSM support. Auditd logs when I go to console using ctrl+alt+f2 combination from X. Thanks for clarifying this. Ganbold Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ARRRRGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?!
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006, Oliver Fromme wrote: [...] Then the names match exactly what the branches are: current is the current head of experimental development, releng is the release engineering branch, and stable is the stable branch for people who want to track only security fixes and the most critical stuff. Which is pretty well what OpenLDAP does; over there, HEAD is bleeding edge, RELEASE is the latest version, and STABLE is, well, stable as understood by most humans... See http://www.openldap.org/software/download/ -- Dave ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problems with auditd -- resolved
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006, Ganbold wrote: Robert Watson wrote: On Mon, 18 Sep 2006, Ganbold wrote: Strange, there are still no logs in /var/audit dir :( Even tried to use your config, no success. However when I logged on to my desktop from console to itself (ssh -l tsgan localhost) it starts logging. But why it is not logging when I'm on console? Are you using xdm/kdm/gdm/etc or /usr/bin/login? I'm not sure that the various GUI login managers associated with X11 ship with BSM support compiled in by default, although given that they also run on Solaris, it is likely they support it. Ok, I'm using gnome and gnome-terminal, and it is not logging. Probably gnome-terminal is not compiled with BSM support. Auditd logs when I go to console using ctrl+alt+f2 combination from X. Thanks for clarifying this. Basically, at login, the audit subsystem determins what new audit properties are required for the login session and assigns them to the process, which consists of both the audit identifier associated with the user, and the preselection mask. Events associated with non-authenticated sessions (which is what gdm logins will count as) should still get audited using the properties for the global naflags setting, so if you want to audit events associated with gdm you can set naflags to include more events. This will also be what audits things like web server activity, so it may result in significant numbers of events being audited as part of that also. We will need to add audit extensions to new login mechanisms, such as xdm/kdm/gdm, or enable them if already present but not enabled on FreeBSD by default. OpenSSH, for example, already included BSM support due to Solaris and Mac OS X BSM, so we just enabled it by switching a flag in the compile (and also fixed a bug in it!). We should probably talk to the maintainers of these ports about investigating creating or enabling BSM support. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Q] multisync irmc/irmc_bluetooth plugins
2006/9/18, Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 10:55:24PM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote: Plus, Multisync is dead in water, project abandoned... Not completely true. Multisync in its current form is abandoned, but a new version based on the OpenSync framework (http://www.opensync.org/) is in the works. Thanks, will check it. -- Dennis Melentyev ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Too dumb to mount as non privileged user
Hello, using a 6.2-PRERELEASE I am not able to let a normal user mount a cdrom. I have tried the following: o vfs.usermount=1 to sysctl.conf o added group usermounters o added user to usermounters o own acd0 root:usermounters to devfs.conf o perm acd0 0660 to devfs.conf o created directory with ownership of non privileged user o reboot Trying to mount as user to the users own directory yields 'operation not permitted' error. So I changed the ownerships to 0666 but this didn't help either. I doublechecked sysctl, groups and ownerships. Can please anybody give me a hint? TIA Norbert ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Too dumb to mount as non privileged user
On Monday 18 September 2006 15:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I changed the ownerships to 0666 but this didn't help either. I doublechecked sysctl, groups and ownerships. Can please anybody give me a hint? IIRC the mount point directory must be owned by the user attempting the mount. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Too dumb to mount as non privileged user
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, using a 6.2-PRERELEASE I am not able to let a normal user mount a cdrom. I have tried the following: o vfs.usermount=1 to sysctl.conf o added group usermounters o added user to usermounters o own acd0 root:usermounters to devfs.conf o perm acd0 0660 to devfs.conf o created directory with ownership of non privileged user o reboot Trying to mount as user to the users own directory yields 'operation not permitted' error. So I changed the ownerships to 0666 but this didn't help either. I doublechecked sysctl, groups and ownerships. Can please anybody give me a hint? Make sure the cd9660 kernel module is loaded before you mount a CD as user. The first time you mount a CD the module is loaded but a user is not allowed to load a kernel module. You may want to load the module during boot time by putting a corresponding entry in /boot/loader.conf --jona ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cron+nsswitch+winbind = wierd thing
Recently I had rebooted my server after a long uptime and after reboot cron didn't run any jobs. This is what I found in its log (time, host and pid are stripped): NSSWITCH(nss_method_lookup): winbind, group, setgrent, not found NSSWITCH(nss_method_lookup): winbind, group, getgrent_r, not found NSSWITCH(nss_method_lookup): winbind, group, endgrent, not found NSSWITCH(nss_method_lookup): winbind, passwd, endpwent, not found I have winbind for passwd and group in my nsswitch.conf, of course, and everything else except for cron worked properly. E.g. I could run 'pw showgroup -a' and it returned both local and windows groups. After I restarted cron and it started to work normally again. I suspect that cron couldn't find nss_winbind.so for some reason (which is in /usr/local/lib). I thought that this might have been because cron was started before rc.d/ldconfig ran and added /usr/local/lib, but according to dmesg cron was started after ldconfig. So I am out of ideas now. -- Andriy Gapon ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Too dumb to mount as non privileged user
Jona Joachim wrote: Make sure the cd9660 kernel module is loaded before you mount a CD as user. The first time you mount a CD the module is loaded but a user is not allowed to load a kernel module. You may want to load the module during boot time by putting a corresponding entry in /boot/loader.conf --jona Thanks, that's it! Norbert ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ath0 weak connectivity
I have had similar problems with the driver. The signal quality in Windows is higher. But there are other problems. For example, when I start Limewire I have to wait for about 3 minutes before it loads. I am sure this is a problem with ath interface. On 9/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Send freebsd-stable mailing list submissions to freebsd-stable@freebsd.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of freebsd-stable digest... Today's Topics: 1. Re: Problems with auditd -- resolved (Cristiano Deana) 2. Re: Attention Julian Stacey (Wilko Bulte) 3. [Q] multisync irmc/irmc_bluetooth plugins (Dennis Melentyev) 4. Re: Polling and em0 (Eugene Kazarinov) 5. Re: Attention Julian Stacey (Julian H. Stacey) 6. Re: Polling and em0 (Robert Watson) 7. Re: agh! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's gmirror code?! (Jo Rhett) 8. Re: Attention Julian Stacey (Jase Thew) 9. Re: [Q] multisync irmc/irmc_bluetooth plugins (Pav Lucistnik) 10. Re: [Q] multisync irmc/irmc_bluetooth plugins (Henrik Brix Andersen) 11. Re: RELENG_6 power button ignored after halt if ACPI enabled (Mark Kirkwood) 12. Re: bge watchdog timeouts still happening (Ronald Klop) 13. Re: Problems with auditd -- resolved (Ganbold) 14. ath0 weak connectivity (Dmitry Karasik) 15. Re: Problems with auditd -- resolved (Robert Watson) 16. Re: Problems with auditd -- resolved (Ganbold) 17. Re: Problems with auditd -- resolved (Robert Watson) 18. Re: AGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?! (Oliver Fromme) 19. Re: Problems with auditd -- resolved (Ganbold) 20. Re: AGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?! (Dave Horsfall) 21. Re: Problems with auditd -- resolved (Robert Watson) 22. Re: [Q] multisync irmc/irmc_bluetooth plugins (Dennis Melentyev) 23. Too dumb to mount as non privileged user ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 24. Re: Too dumb to mount as non privileged user (George Potapov) 25. Re: Too dumb to mount as non privileged user (Jona Joachim) -- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 17:08:25 +0200 From: Cristiano Deana [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Problems with auditd -- resolved To: Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Joerg Pernfuss [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ganbold [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed 2006/9/17, Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I've just comitted a fix to syscalls.master and regenerated the remaining system call files, which should correct the auditctl: Invalid Argument error being returned by auditd. In short order, this fix should be on the cvsup mirrors -- please let me know if it resolves the problem you were experiencing. auditd up and running, tnx Robert. I will submit more information. -- Cris, member of G.U.F.I Italian FreeBSD User Group http://www.gufi.org/ -- Message: 2 Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 17:48:36 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Attention Julian Stacey To: Maxim Konovalov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Julian H. Stacey [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 12:49:43PM +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote.. On Sun, 17 Sep 2006, 02:31-0600, Scott Long wrote: Julian H. Stacey wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] lol, that's the stupidest thing I've heard all week. Inflamatory. Refered to postmaster. Julian, meet Kris. Kris has been the head of the FreeBSD ports team for a large number of years. He's also written and presented several papers on FreeBSD performance, among many other hobbies and interests. He's a pretty laid back and fun guy, with a sharp sense of humor. Kris, meet Julian. Julian has been a FreeBSD user, contributor, and advocate since before there was such a such a thing as 'FreeBSD', or even 'http' for that matter. I've never met him in person, but based on the many years worth of emails I've seen from him, he seems like a pretty decent and smart fellow. Julian, meet Paul Saab. Paul was a key FreeBSD developer for many years at Yahoo. He's worked on many areas of the FreeBSD codebase, and has been instrumental in gaining and coordinating support for FreeBSD from many corporate vendors. He also runs mu.org as a hobby and as an informal hosting service for many FreeBSD developers, including Kris. He might also one day
Re: ARRRRGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?!
Oliver Fromme wrote: Michael Abbott wrote: Roland Smith wrote: Martin Nilsson wrote: Hans Lambermont wrote: .. or just stop calling it STABLE and call it RELENG_6 instead That's a good idea, IMHO. When I started with FreeBSD I found the difference between the branch names and cvs tags confusing. Let me second that. I hadn't realised that STABLE==RELENG_n (where n is the current version number) until very recently, and I've seen the STABLE isn't stable thing crop up over and over again over the last few years, both on mailing lists and IRC. Actually, FreeBSD has three types of branches: - current a.k.a. HEAD - X-stable a.k.a. RELENG_X - X.Y security branch a.k.a. RELENG_X_Y I think it would be better to rename the 2nd one RELENG (instead of STABLE), because that's exactly what it is: the release-engineering branch from which the releases are derived. The term STABLE would be much better suitable for the 3rd type of branches which are currently called security branches. Thus we would have: - current - releng - stable Then the names match exactly what the branches are: current is the current head of experimental development, releng is the release engineering branch, and stable is the stable branch for people who want to track only security fixes and the most critical stuff. Such appropriate naming would certainly prevent a lot of confusion. Best regards Oliver I agree! My $.02 Steve -- They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. (Ben Franklin) The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases. (Thomas Jefferson) ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problems with auditd -- resolved
2006/9/18, Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'm bit confused here I thought auditd should log all activities, but I don't see any log files. Am I doing something wrong here or my understanding regarding auditd is wrong? Your configuration looks right to me, and should be generating a ridiculous number of audit records. just try few minutes with fw. works for me. tnx Robert Co. -- Cris, member of G.U.F.I Italian FreeBSD User Group http://www.gufi.org/ ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DNS query performance
Hello Mike, Although it sounds silly, could you try recompiling 6.1 and 7.0 with a non-SMP kernel and see how they perform? That would at least tell us if it's a general performance problem in 6.x and 7.x, or if SMP is somehow hurting performance in this case. I have this numbers spread over my e-mails. Just putting they together: OS q/s --- --- FreeBSD 6.1 SMP 14953 FreeBSD 6.1 UP 15516 FreeBSD 7.x SMP 15323 FreeBSD 7.x UP 16200 FreeBSD 4.11 SMP34977 FreeBSD 4.11 UP 33926 I think is a general problem in 6.x and 7.x. UP kernel is always a little bit better, but I can't see big changes tweaking from SMP to UP. On the other hand, with the same hardware, 4.11 is twice better in performance. -- Att., Marcelo Gardini ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Polling and em0
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006, Eugene Kazarinov wrote: EK dell1# cat /dev/zero | dd bs=1m | nc dell2 3000 EK ^C0+18456 records in EK 0+18455 records out EK 1209466880 bytes transferred in 12.459299 secs (97,073,429 bytes/sec) EK EK EK Do you meen that from 6.2 I dont need polling for fastest performance? We had opposite experience, at least in situation when 1 Gbps RELENG_6 router have to route a LOT of small packets from a few thousands of residential ethernet customers... We have bge instead of em though. Maybe it's time to experiment further now. Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mod_php4 unavaible
hi list I've updated php4 this morning, and my web site using lost php module. the php4 is unavailble on my system. /usr/ports/www/mod_php4 has been removed, and I don't know how to get it workind, some ideas? ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_php4 unavaible
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi list I've updated php4 this morning, and my web site using lost php module. the php4 is unavailble on my system. /usr/ports/www/mod_php4 has been removed, and I don't know how to get it workind, From /usr/ports/UPDATING 20060506: AFFECTS: users of PHP AUTHOR: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The old PHP slave ports (phpN-cli, phpN-cgi and mod_phpN) were removed in favour of unified PHP ports that allow building any combination of PHP SAPIs (cli, cgi and apache module). The PHP CGI binary was renamed to php-cgi, so you should update the path in your script. To simplify the update process, *only* for this release a 'php' compatibility symlink to php-cgi will be created if you don't select the CLI SAPI. Before the upgrade you *should* run 'make config' in lang/php4 or lang/php5 to configure the SAPIs you want to install. As a consequence the default binary packages include the CLI and the FastCGI SAPIs. Dominic some ideas? ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_php4 unavaible
On 18/09/2006 15.39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi list I've updated php4 this morning, and my web site using lost php module. the php4 is unavailble on my system. /usr/ports/www/mod_php4 has been removed, and I don't know how to get it workind, some ideas? from /usr/ports/UPDATING: 20060506: AFFECTS: users of PHP AUTHOR: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The old PHP slave ports (phpN-cli, phpN-cgi and mod_phpN) were removed in favour of unified PHP ports that allow building any combination of PHP SAPIs (cli, cgi and apache module). The PHP CGI binary was renamed to php-cgi, so you should update the path in your script. To simplify the update process, *only* for this release a 'php' compatibility symlink to php-cgi will be created if you don't select the CLI SAPI. Before the upgrade you *should* run 'make config' in lang/php4 or lang/php5 to configure the SAPIs you want to install. As a consequence the default binary packages include the CLI and the FastCGI SAPIs. -- Luca Morettoni luca(AT)morettoni(DOT)net - http://morettoni.net GUFI staff/core member luca(AT)gufi(DOT)org - http://gufi.org AIP/ITCS member #2589 | FreeSBIE developer luca(AT)FreeSBIE(DOT)org Thawte notary (15 points) - http://www.thawte.com ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_php4 unavaible
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi list I've updated php4 this morning, and my web site using lost php module. the php4 is unavailble on my system. /usr/ports/www/mod_php4 has been removed, and I don't know how to get it workind, some ideas? As far as I know, php builds own modules called usually libphp(version number).so and places it in $PREFIX$/$MODULES$ dir of your apache. Did you used --with-apxs=... option while building? ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_php4 unavaible
Hi! I've updated php4 this morning, and my web site using lost php module. the php4 is unavailble on my system. /usr/ports/www/mod_php4 has been removed, and I don't know how to get it workind, See /usr/ports/lang/php4 HTH, Patrick M. Hausen Leiter Netzwerke und Sicherheit -- punkt.de GmbH Internet - Dienstleistungen - Beratung Vorholzstr. 25Tel. 0721 9109 -0 Fax: -100 76137 Karlsruhe http://punkt.de ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_php4 unavaible
On Sep 18, 2006, at 9:39 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi list I've updated php4 this morning, and my web site using lost php module. the php4 is unavailble on my system. /usr/ports/www/ mod_php4 has been removed, and I don't know how to get it workind, some ideas? The php4 module isn't build by default anymore. Reinstall php4: make reinstall -DWITH_APACHE -jav ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: network performance problem
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Ingo wrote: I`ve some problems with the network performance on my Soekris NET 4801. (Freebsd 6.1 release-p3) When I start netio on the soekris and do a netio localhost, I get about 8.4 MB/sec, and when I start with netio 192.168.0.11(it´s localhost address) I get only ~2.3 MB/sec. That´s what top says when I do: What does route get 192.168.0.11 return? What happens if you force the localhost MTU from whatever the default is (most likely 16k) to the same as the ethernet interface? Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge localhost CPU states: 2.3% user, 0.0% nice, 72.5% system, 25.2% interrupt, 0.0% idle 192.168.0.11 CPU states: 1.2% user, 0.0% nice, 46.3% system, 52.5% interrupt, 0.0% idle As you can see, the interrupt load is more than doubled when I use the Ip address, and I´ve no idea why. Here are some other throughput results of the soekris: openbsd# ftp 192.16.8.0.20 2.0 MB/sec openbsd# iperf localhost 1.4 Mbit/sec openbsd# iperf 192.168.0.11(it´s localhost address) 1.4 Mbit/sec openbsd# netperf localhost 70MB/sec openbsd# netperf 192.168.0.11(it´s localhost address) 70MB/sec freebsd# ftp 192.168.0.20 2.3 MB/sec Freebsd# iperf localhost 45 Mbit/sec Freebsd# iperf 192.168.0.11 (it´s localhost address) 19 Mbit/sec Freebsd# netperf localhost 67 Mbit/sec Freebsd# netperf 192.168.0.11 (it´s localhost address) 19 Mbit/sec What causes the difference between localhost and the ip address on Freebsd? On Openbsd there is no diffenerce at all. Greetings -- Erstellt mit Operas revolutionärem E-Mail-Modul: http://www.opera.com/mail/ ___ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_php4 unavaible
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi list I've updated php4 this morning, and my web site using lost php module. the php4 is unavailble on my system. /usr/ports/www/mod_php4 has been removed, and I don't know how to get it workind, some ideas? ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can compile apache module from /usr/ports/lang/php4. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_php4 unavaible
Patrick M. Hausen wrote: Hi! I've updated php4 this morning, and my web site using lost php module. the php4 is unavailble on my system. /usr/ports/www/mod_php4 has been removed, and I don't know how to get it workind, See /usr/ports/lang/php4 HTH, Patrick M. Hausen Leiter Netzwerke und Sicherheit I'll post in the right list next time, and tell whether it's ok after checks. -- Richard VENNE www.dental-on-line.com Phone: 01 43 27 94 24 fax: 01 43 27 66 85 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_php4 unavaible [resolved]
Patrick M. Hausen wrote: Hi! I've updated php4 this morning, and my web site using lost php module. the php4 is unavailble on my system. /usr/ports/www/mod_php4 has been removed, and I don't know how to get it workind, See /usr/ports/lang/php4 HTH, Patrick M. Hausen Leiter Netzwerke und Sicherheit sudo make deinstall sudo make reinstall -DWITH_APACHE sudo libtool --finish /usr/ports/lang/php4/work/php-4.4.4/libs sudo /usr/local/etc/rc.d/030.apache2.sh reload works well thanks for all -- Richard VENNE www.dental-on-line.com Phone: 01 43 27 94 24 fax: 01 43 27 66 85 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ath0 weak connectivity
Dmitry Karasik wrote: Hi, Has anyone experienced problems with ath0 giving bad connectivity on 6.1-STABLE? My wireless card reported as Atheros 5212 rapidly loses connectivity if I move it more than 2-3 meters away from the access point, but the same notebook connects well from under windows. I tried both kernel with both old device ath_rate_sample and ath_rate_onoe, tried to play with AP's settings, changed transmit rate and beacon interval, nothing helps. One interesting thing though is that ifconfig ath0 scan reports my station as configured to 119ms beacon interval, while it is set to 100ms actually. Anything else I can try? ifconfig ath0 scan doesn't report your local configuration, it triggers a scan and reports the scan results. If your local station thinks the beacon internal is 119ms when it's really 100ms then something is very confused but it's unlikely to cause bad connectivity (unless you're operating the station in power save mode which isn't currently possible). I do not understand what bad connectivity means. If you provide information like the mac+phy revs for the card, hal version, and statistics from programs like athstats then it might be possible to identify what's wrong. Otherwise look at turning on debugging at the net80211 layer with wlandebug. Both athstats and wlandebug are found in src/tools/tools (under net80211 and ath respectively). Sam ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ath0 weak connectivity
Radu Adrian Zdrinca wrote: I have had similar problems with the driver. The signal quality in Windows is higher. But there are other problems. For example, when I start Limewire I have to wait for about 3 minutes before it loads. I am sure this is a problem with ath interface. How do you know the signal quality in Windows is higher? I know nothing about Limewire and cannot say why you think problems with it are related to ath. Regardless, read my response to the original poster; I can't offer advise w/o meaningful information. Sam ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
aac0 command timeouts
Today one of my admins noticed the following errors on a 6.0-REL-p4 system (Sun X4100) with an Adaptec 2230SLP RAID card: aac0: COMMAND 0x80841700 TIMEOUT AFTER 36 SECONDS aac0: COMMAND 0x80846160 TIMEOUT AFTER 36 SECONDS aac0: COMMAND 0x80843370 TIMEOUT AFTER 36 SECONDS aac0: COMMAND 0x80841700 TIMEOUT AFTER 56 SECONDS aac0: COMMAND 0x80846160 TIMEOUT AFTER 56 SECONDS aac0: COMMAND 0x80843370 TIMEOUT AFTER 56 SECONDS They were all logged at the same timestamp in /var/log/messages. The card is hooked up to a Dell 14-disk hot-swap array with U320 drives and backplane. I poked around and found some references to this on the mailing lists for FreeBSD 4.x and 5.1, with references to should be fixed in 5.2, but that seemed to be relating to the system locking up at boot. I don't have that problem. Some messages also indicate that it could be a firmware issue and updating firmware solved it for them. This worries me since this system was built new last January so should have recent firmware in the drives. Is this still a problem for other folks? Also, what utilities can I use on FreeBSD 6 to probe the drives for firmware. I know with the LSI controllers the LSI command line utilities give you this info, but the Adaptec aaccli program doesn't have a way to find this out. Also what strategy do people use for updating the firmware on drives hooked up to RAID cards? The last time I tried this the updating program (dos boot CD) was unable to see the physical drives past the card.
Re: ath0 weak connectivity
Radu Adrian Zdrinca wrote: I have had similar problems with the driver. The signal quality in Windows is higher. But there are other problems. For example, when I start Limewire I have to wait for about 3 minutes before it loads. I am sure this is a problem with ath interface. If I recall correctly, Limewire is java-based p2p app and java on Linux and FreeBSD requires a bit more resources than on Windows (according to SUN's recommendations i read the last time). I guess this is due to different strategies for memory management in the implementation of Java VM. It depends on what machines you are running java - on slower ones, or such with less memory, the time for loading java vm, and the time for allocation of memory for bigger apps may vary quite a lot, but 3 minutes looks like more problem of slow dns resolving, if many peers are connecting to you, etc.. I suppose this is not related to problems with driver, but anything is possible, just better testing and more investigations can prove that.. Cheers, Emil ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: network performance problem
Hi, heres the output of route get 192.168.0.11: localhost# route get 192.168.0.11 route to: 192.168.0.11 destination: 192.168.0.0 mask: 255.255.255.0 interface: sis0 flags: UP,DONE,CLONING recvpipe sendpipe ssthresh rtt,msecrttvar hopcount mtu expire 0 0 0 0 0 0 1500 -69 I set the lo0 interface as you recommended from 16384 to 1500. Now I have the same thoughput as with the IP (~2.3MB/s). Shouldn´t FreeBSD recognize, that it is it´s local address, like openbsd does? Greetings Am 18.09.2006, 15:52 Uhr, schrieb Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Ingo wrote: I`ve some problems with the network performance on my Soekris NET 4801. (Freebsd 6.1 release-p3) When I start netio on the soekris and do a netio localhost, I get about 8.4 MB/sec, and when I start with netio 192.168.0.11(it´s localhost address) I get only ~2.3 MB/sec. That´s what top says when I do: What does route get 192.168.0.11 return? What happens if you force the localhost MTU from whatever the default is (most likely 16k) to the same as the ethernet interface? Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge localhost CPU states: 2.3% user, 0.0% nice, 72.5% system, 25.2% interrupt, 0.0% idle 192.168.0.11 CPU states: 1.2% user, 0.0% nice, 46.3% system, 52.5% interrupt, 0.0% idle As you can see, the interrupt load is more than doubled when I use the Ip address, and I´ve no idea why. Here are some other throughput results of the soekris: openbsd# ftp 192.16.8.0.20 2.0 MB/sec openbsd# iperf localhost 1.4 Mbit/sec openbsd# iperf 192.168.0.11(it´s localhost address) 1.4 Mbit/sec openbsd# netperf localhost 70MB/sec openbsd# netperf 192.168.0.11(it´s localhost address) 70MB/sec freebsd# ftp 192.168.0.20 2.3 MB/sec Freebsd# iperf localhost 45 Mbit/sec Freebsd# iperf 192.168.0.11 (it´s localhost address) 19 Mbit/sec Freebsd# netperf localhost 67 Mbit/sec Freebsd# netperf 192.168.0.11 (it´s localhost address) 19 Mbit/sec What causes the difference between localhost and the ip address on Freebsd? On Openbsd there is no diffenerce at all. Greetings -- Erstellt mit Operas revolutionärem E-Mail-Modul: http://www.opera.com/mail/ ___ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: network performance problem
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006, Ingo wrote: heres the output of route get 192.168.0.11: localhost# route get 192.168.0.11 route to: 192.168.0.11 destination: 192.168.0.0 mask: 255.255.255.0 interface: sis0 flags: UP,DONE,CLONING recvpipe sendpipe ssthresh rtt,msecrttvar hopcount mtu expire 0 0 0 0 0 0 1500 -69 I set the lo0 interface as you recommended from 16384 to 1500. Now I have the same thoughput as with the IP (~2.3MB/s). Shouldn´t FreeBSD recognize, that it is it´s local address, like openbsd does? What MTU does OpenBSD use on its loopback interface as compared to the network interface? Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge Greetings Am 18.09.2006, 15:52 Uhr, schrieb Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Ingo wrote: I`ve some problems with the network performance on my Soekris NET 4801. (Freebsd 6.1 release-p3) When I start netio on the soekris and do a netio localhost, I get about 8.4 MB/sec, and when I start with netio 192.168.0.11(it´s localhost address) I get only ~2.3 MB/sec. That´s what top says when I do: What does route get 192.168.0.11 return? What happens if you force the localhost MTU from whatever the default is (most likely 16k) to the same as the ethernet interface? Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge localhost CPU states: 2.3% user, 0.0% nice, 72.5% system, 25.2% interrupt, 0.0% idle 192.168.0.11 CPU states: 1.2% user, 0.0% nice, 46.3% system, 52.5% interrupt, 0.0% idle As you can see, the interrupt load is more than doubled when I use the Ip address, and I´ve no idea why. Here are some other throughput results of the soekris: openbsd# ftp 192.16.8.0.20 2.0 MB/sec openbsd# iperf localhost 1.4 Mbit/sec openbsd# iperf 192.168.0.11(it´s localhost address) 1.4 Mbit/sec openbsd# netperf localhost 70MB/sec openbsd# netperf 192.168.0.11(it´s localhost address) 70MB/sec freebsd# ftp 192.168.0.20 2.3 MB/sec Freebsd# iperf localhost 45 Mbit/sec Freebsd# iperf 192.168.0.11 (it´s localhost address) 19 Mbit/sec Freebsd# netperf localhost 67 Mbit/sec Freebsd# netperf 192.168.0.11 (it´s localhost address) 19 Mbit/sec What causes the difference between localhost and the ip address on Freebsd? On Openbsd there is no diffenerce at all. Greetings -- Erstellt mit Operas revolutionärem E-Mail-Modul: http://www.opera.com/mail/ ___ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: network performance problem
OpenBSD uses on sis0 MTU=1500 and lo0= MTU=33224 Am 18.09.2006, 20:56 Uhr, schrieb Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Mon, 18 Sep 2006, Ingo wrote: heres the output of route get 192.168.0.11: localhost# route get 192.168.0.11 route to: 192.168.0.11 destination: 192.168.0.0 mask: 255.255.255.0 interface: sis0 flags: UP,DONE,CLONING recvpipe sendpipe ssthresh rtt,msecrttvar hopcount mtu expire 0 0 0 0 0 0 1500 -69 I set the lo0 interface as you recommended from 16384 to 1500. Now I have the same thoughput as with the IP (~2.3MB/s). Shouldn´t FreeBSD recognize, that it is it´s local address, like openbsd does? What MTU does OpenBSD use on its loopback interface as compared to the network interface? Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge Greetings Am 18.09.2006, 15:52 Uhr, schrieb Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Ingo wrote: I`ve some problems with the network performance on my Soekris NET 4801. (Freebsd 6.1 release-p3) When I start netio on the soekris and do a netio localhost, I get about 8.4 MB/sec, and when I start with netio 192.168.0.11(it´s localhost address) I get only ~2.3 MB/sec. That´s what top says when I do: What does route get 192.168.0.11 return? What happens if you force the localhost MTU from whatever the default is (most likely 16k) to the same as the ethernet interface? Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge localhost CPU states: 2.3% user, 0.0% nice, 72.5% system, 25.2% interrupt, 0.0% idle 192.168.0.11 CPU states: 1.2% user, 0.0% nice, 46.3% system, 52.5% interrupt, 0.0% idle As you can see, the interrupt load is more than doubled when I use the Ip address, and I´ve no idea why. Here are some other throughput results of the soekris: openbsd# ftp 192.16.8.0.20 2.0 MB/sec openbsd# iperf localhost 1.4 Mbit/sec openbsd# iperf 192.168.0.11(it´s localhost address) 1.4 Mbit/sec openbsd# netperf localhost 70MB/sec openbsd# netperf 192.168.0.11(it´s localhost address) 70MB/sec freebsd# ftp 192.168.0.20 2.3 MB/sec Freebsd# iperf localhost 45 Mbit/sec Freebsd# iperf 192.168.0.11 (it´s localhost address) 19 Mbit/sec Freebsd# netperf localhost 67 Mbit/sec Freebsd# netperf 192.168.0.11 (it´s localhost address) 19 Mbit/sec What causes the difference between localhost and the ip address on Freebsd? On Openbsd there is no diffenerce at all. Greetings -- Erstellt mit Operas revolutionärem E-Mail-Modul: http://www.opera.com/mail/ ___ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
isc-dhcpd and jails bound to an aliased ip
Attempting to run isc-dhcpd (using USE_SOCKETS) inside a jail bound to an aliased ip does not appear to work. The process never seems to recieve any broadcast traffic; however, it does see unicast traffic as would be expected. I'm not sure how to debug this since one cannot run tcpdump in the jail to see what traffic is getting there obviously. It works fine if I change the jail to bind to the primary ip on the interface. Not surprisingly, it also works fine if I run it outside of a jail using BPF. Changing the broadcast addresses on the aliases does not seem to change anything. It is just that the kernel will not deliver broadcasts to jails on ip aliases as I suspect? Yes, I now I have a zombied jail in the jls listing. There are no processes with a JID of 2 running, and I'm reluctant to reboot the machine because it's in production. If I have to run the jail on the primary ip address, that's okay. I would just prefer to have it running in a seperate jail and still have ssh running on the standard port (less confusing to users). Relevant configuration: em0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500 options=bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU inet6 fe80::213:72ff:fe4b:70e7%em0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet 136.168.1.5 netmask 0x broadcast 136.168.255.255 inet 136.168.1.8 netmask 0x broadcast 136.168.1.8 inet 136.168.1.91 netmask 0x broadcast 136.168.1.91 ether 00:13:72:4b:70:e7 media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX full-duplex) status: active # global jail knobs jail_enable=YES jail_list=ns1 netstat jail_set_hostname_allow=NO # ns1 jail jail_ns1_rootdir=/usr/jail/ns1 jail_ns1_hostname=ns1.csub.edu jail_ns1_ip=136.168.1.91 jail_ns1_exec_start=/bin/sh /etc/rc jail_ns1_devfs_enable=YES jail_ns1_mount_enable=YES # netstat jail jail_netstat_rootdir=/usr/jail/netstat jail_netstat_hostname=netstat.csub.edu jail_netstat_ip=136.168.1.8 jail_netstat_exec_start=/bin/sh /etc/rc jail_netstat_devfs_enable=YES jail_netstat_mount_enable=YES JID IP Address Hostname Path 8 136.168.1.91ns1.csub.edu /usr/jail/ns1 4 136.168.1.8 netstat.csub.edu /usr/jail/netstat 2 136.168.1.91ns1.csub.edu /usr/jail/ns1 Thanks, -- Russell A. Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Analyst CSUB Network Services ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RELENG_6 Livelock
On Sunday 17 September 2006 02:05, Frode Nordahl wrote: On 17. sep. 2006, at 04.42, John Baldwin wrote: On Saturday 16 September 2006 16:55, Frode Nordahl wrote: On 16. sep. 2006, at 22.22, Frode Nordahl wrote: On 16. sep. 2006, at 22.09, John Baldwin wrote: On Saturday 16 September 2006 07:02, Frode Nordahl wrote: Hello, FreeBSD localhost.localdomain 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2- PRERELEASE #1: Wed Sep 13 00:10:04 CEST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/ usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PT i386 After running some stress tests for 3 days, I wanted to remove some large directories. Do you have a coredump? I assume you do from your debug output. Can you download http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/gdb/gdb6, fire up kgdb, and once in kgdb, do 'source /path/to/gdb6' and then run 'ps' and reply with the output from that? I am sorry, I have not. I tried to call doadump, but there was no dumpdevice configured :-( Somehow I have convinced myself that this was turned on by default now, so I have not enabled it explicitly in rc.conf. Is there any way to tell DDB what dumpdevice to use directly? I will configure a dumpdevice and try really hard to make it happen again. I was able to reproduce the livelock again, and this time I had the system armed with dumpon :-) Here is the output you requested: (kgdb) ps pid ppid pgrp uid state wmesg wchancmd 2535 2499 2535 0 R+ CPU 0 rm 2534 2499 2534 0 L+ *Giant0xc6704580 rm 2533 2499 2533 0 L+ *Giant0xc6704580 rm 2532 2499 2532 0 R+ rm 2531 2499 2531 0 L+ *Giant0xc6704580 rm 2499 2496 2499 0 Ss+ ttyin0xc655d810 bash 2496 784 2496 0 Rs sshd Ok, do 'lockchain 2534' in kgdb (with gdb6 sourced) and let me see the output from that. (kgdb) lockchain 2534 thread 100038 (pid 2534, rm) blocked on lock 0xc09e6800 Giant thread 100091 (pid 2535, rm) running on CPU 0 Ok, do 'proc 2535' followed by 'where' -- John Baldwin ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ath0 weak connectivity
I'm sorry that I don't have freebsd on my system to do more testing but I'm pretty sure it's the ath0 interface that's causing the issue. When the interface is down limewire starts normally but when it's up it takes about 3 minutes to load. I have tried upgrading to stable but it's still the same issue. I will try to reinstall to do some more testing. On 9/18/06, Emil Stoyanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Radu Adrian Zdrinca wrote: I have had similar problems with the driver. The signal quality in Windows is higher. But there are other problems. For example, when I start Limewire I have to wait for about 3 minutes before it loads. I am sure this is a problem with ath interface. If I recall correctly, Limewire is java-based p2p app and java on Linux and FreeBSD requires a bit more resources than on Windows (according to SUN's recommendations i read the last time). I guess this is due to different strategies for memory management in the implementation of Java VM. It depends on what machines you are running java - on slower ones, or such with less memory, the time for loading java vm, and the time for allocation of memory for bigger apps may vary quite a lot, but 3 minutes looks like more problem of slow dns resolving, if many peers are connecting to you, etc.. I suppose this is not related to problems with driver, but anything is possible, just better testing and more investigations can prove that.. Cheers, Emil ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: RELENG_6 Livelock
On 18. sep. 2006, at 22.14, John Baldwin wrote:
On Sunday 17 September 2006 02:05, Frode Nordahl wrote:
On 17. sep. 2006, at 04.42, John Baldwin wrote:
On Saturday 16 September 2006 16:55, Frode Nordahl wrote:
On 16. sep. 2006, at 22.22, Frode Nordahl wrote:
On 16. sep. 2006, at 22.09, John Baldwin wrote:
On Saturday 16 September 2006 07:02, Frode Nordahl wrote:
Hello,
FreeBSD localhost.localdomain 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-
PRERELEASE
#1: Wed Sep 13 00:10:04 CEST 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/
usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PT i386
After running some stress tests for 3 days, I wanted to remove
some
large directories.
Do you have a coredump? I assume you do from your debug
output. Can
you download http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/gdb/gdb6, fire up kgdb,
and
once in kgdb, do 'source /path/to/gdb6' and then run 'ps' and
reply
with the output from that?
I am sorry, I have not. I tried to call doadump, but there was no
dumpdevice configured :-(
Somehow I have convinced myself that this was turned on by default
now, so I have not enabled it explicitly in rc.conf. Is there any
way to tell DDB what dumpdevice to use directly?
I will configure a dumpdevice and try really hard to make it
happen
again.
I was able to reproduce the livelock again, and this time I had the
system armed with dumpon :-)
Here is the output you requested:
(kgdb) ps
pid ppid pgrp uid state wmesg wchancmd
2535 2499 2535 0 R+ CPU 0 rm
2534 2499 2534 0 L+ *Giant0xc6704580 rm
2533 2499 2533 0 L+ *Giant0xc6704580 rm
2532 2499 2532 0 R+ rm
2531 2499 2531 0 L+ *Giant0xc6704580 rm
2499 2496 2499 0 Ss+ ttyin0xc655d810 bash
2496 784 2496 0 Rs sshd
Ok, do 'lockchain 2534' in kgdb (with gdb6 sourced) and let me
see the
output from that.
(kgdb) lockchain 2534
thread 100038 (pid 2534, rm) blocked on lock 0xc09e6800 Giant
thread 100091 (pid 2535, rm) running on CPU 0
Ok, do 'proc 2535' followed by 'where'
(kgdb) proc 2535
(kgdb) where
#0 doadump () at pcpu.h:165
#1 0xc04733bb in db_fncall (dummy1=1016, dummy2=0, dummy3=-319658232,
dummy4=0xecf2670c @g??) at /usr/src/sys/ddb/db_command.c:492
#2 0xc04731c0 in db_command (last_cmdp=0xc09cb624, cmd_table=0x0,
aux_cmd_tablep=0xc092a838, aux_cmd_tablep_end=0xc092a854)
at /usr/src/sys/ddb/db_command.c:350
#3 0xc0473288 in db_command_loop () at /usr/src/sys/ddb/db_command.c:
458
#4 0xc0474e95 in db_trap (type=3, code=0) at /usr/src/sys/ddb/
db_main.c:221
#5 0xc0696203 in kdb_trap (type=3, code=0, tf=0xecf2684c)
at /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_kdb.c:473
#6 0xc089140c in trap (frame=
{tf_fs = -319684600, tf_es = -1066860504, tf_ds = -1064304600,
tf_edi = 249, tf_esi = -967491584, tf_ebp = -319657844, tf_isp =
-319657864, tf_ebx = -963122944, tf_edx = 0, tf_ecx = -1056878592,
tf_eax = 34, tf_trapno = 3, tf_err = 0, tf_eip = -1066836089, tf_cs =
32, tf_eflags = 130, tf_esp = -319657816, tf_ss = -1064914410}) at /
usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:594
#7 0xc087f49a in calltrap () at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:139
#8 0xc0695f87 in kdb_enter (msg=0x22 Address 0x22 out of bounds)
at cpufunc.h:60
#9 0xc086b216 in siointr1 (com=0xc6554000) at /usr/src/sys/dev/sio/
sio.c:1522
#10 0xc086aff4 in siointr (arg=0xc6554000) at /usr/src/sys/dev/sio/
sio.c:1391
#11 0xc0883491 in intr_execute_handlers (isrc=0xc63854c4,
iframe=0xecf268f8)
at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/intr_machdep.c:233
---Type return to continue, or q return to quit---
#12 0xc0885852 in lapic_handle_intr (frame=
{if_vec = 56, if_fs = 8, if_es = 40, if_ds = 40, if_edi = 36,
if_esi = -961899520, if_ebp = -319657648, if_ebx = -873832448, if_edx
= 100875, if_ecx = 3111, if_eax = 40, if_eip = -1065518606, if_cs =
32, if_eflags = 643, if_esp = 40, if_ss = 40}) at /usr/src/sys/i386/
i386/local_apic.c:606
#13 0xc087f853 in Xapic_isr1 () at apic_vector.s:110
#14 0xc07d79f2 in ufsdirhash_adjfree (dh=0xc6aa9400, offset=1593184,
diff=-16)
at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_dirhash.c:917
#15 0xc07d6478 in ufsdirhash_build (ip=0xc8b3018c)
at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_dirhash.c:246
#16 0xc07d84b1 in ufs_lookup (ap=0xecf26a7c)
at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_lookup.c:192
#17 0xc08a28b8 in VOP_CACHEDLOOKUP_APV (vop=0x28, a=0x18a0b) at
vnode_if.c:150
#18 0xc06c985e in vfs_cache_lookup (ap=0x28) at vnode_if.h:82
#19 0xc08a2847 in VOP_LOOKUP_APV (vop=0xc09b5840, a=0xecf26b18)
at vnode_if.c:99
#20 0xc06cde31 in lookup (ndp=0xecf26ba0) at vnode_if.h:56
#21 0xc06cd6d2 in namei (ndp=0xecf26ba0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/
vfs_lookup.c:211
#22 0xc06dbe93 in kern_lstat (td=0xc697e900,
path=0x18a0b Address 0x18a0b out of bounds, pathseg=100875,
sbp=0xecf26c74) at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c:2147
#23 0xc06dbe2f in lstat (td=0xc697e900, uap=0xecf26d04)
at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c:2130
---Type return to
ufs - fsck_ffs problem
Hola, I'm running 6.1, and experiening some problems with my RAID array. Using a 3ware escalade, some corruption to the file system has occurred during a power outage. The raw hardware of the filesystem is fine -- at least as far as the 3ware device is concerned. At any rate, I issued: fsho# fsck_ffs -n -b 160 /dev/da0c Alternate super block location: 160 ** /dev/da0c ** Last Mounted on ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes fsck_ffs: cannot alloc 2641372856 bytes for inoinfo I found some code by Einstein: http://www.atm.tut.fi/list-archive/freebsd-stable-2005/msg04212.html which seems to get past the problem. But, I'm certainly concerned about the sanctity of my data, and have committed no suggested changes by the program, as witnessed below: Alternate super block location: 160 ** /dev/da0c (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes UNKNOWN FILE TYPE I=2 CLEAR? no PARTIALLY ALLOCATED INODE I=62 CLEAR? no PARTIALLY ALLOCATED INODE I=75 CLEAR? no PARTIALLY ALLOCATED INODE I=110 CLEAR? no 512903222015925405 BAD I=129 2363463046329258390 BAD I=129 -4878472826699975618 BAD I=129 -3101413049108763758 BAD I=129 -4942707920151290579 BAD I=129 8570194651996646049 BAD I=129 2315016788075931432 BAD I=129 -1520079671300232671 BAD I=129 -8795335986215733707 BAD I=129 -4534688454961916277 BAD I=129 5406555421949755135 BAD I=129 EXCESSIVE BAD BLKS I=129 CONTINUE? yes PARTIALLY TRUNCATED INODE I=130 SALVAGE? no . and this will go on forever, finding billions of problems. I'm at a loss. The file system cannot be that corrupt. Any advice? ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
