Cisco NAS and server side ip pool management

2009-02-13 Thread Sebastian Krieger

Hi,

for many hours now I am trying to configure a Cisco router as a NAS to 
authenticate dialup users against freeradius and provide the ip address 
dynamically from a server based ip pool.


The authentication part works fine and the ip address also gets selected 
from the pool and sent as Framed-IP-Address back to the NAS. The only 
thing is that the ip address seems not to be catched up by the NAS and 
provided to the dialup user. I test the dialup connection from a Windows 
XP machine with an ISDN card and there it always ends in an error 
message that the NAS didn't provide the IP information.


It is absolutely no problem to use a static ip pool on the Cisco router 
instead of a server based ip pool management.


Can someone please send me a working configuration example for a Cisco 
IOS based NAS?


Thanks
Sebastian
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: Cisco NAS and server side ip pool management

2009-02-13 Thread Thoralf Freitag
aaa new-model
aaa authentication login default local
aaa authentication ppp default group radius local
aaa accounting network default start-stop group radius
aaa authorization network default group radius


radius-server host ip of radius auth-port authorization-port acct-port 
accounting-port non-standard key secret


A local ip pool is not used, if your radius sends a FRAMED_IP-ADRESS. 
There is no difference if it is configured or not. Radius wins.
--
Thoralf Freitag
Manager Health Services System Administration

Phone:  +49 (0) 30 68905-4611
Cellular:+49 (0) 151 1631-4611
Fax:+49 (0) 30 68905-2940
Mail:  thoralf.frei...@biotronik.com



From:
Sebastian Krieger s...@ts.tsimail.de
To:
freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
Date:
13.02.09 16:56
Subject:
Cisco NAS and server side ip pool management
Sent by:
freeradius-users-bounces+thoralf.freitag=biotronik@lists.freeradius.org



Hi,

for many hours now I am trying to configure a Cisco router as a NAS to 
authenticate dialup users against freeradius and provide the ip address 
dynamically from a server based ip pool.

The authentication part works fine and the ip address also gets selected 
from the pool and sent as Framed-IP-Address back to the NAS. The only 
thing is that the ip address seems not to be catched up by the NAS and 
provided to the dialup user. I test the dialup connection from a Windows 
XP machine with an ISDN card and there it always ends in an error 
message that the NAS didn't provide the IP information.

It is absolutely no problem to use a static ip pool on the Cisco router 
instead of a server based ip pool management.

Can someone please send me a working configuration example for a Cisco 
IOS based NAS?

Thanks
Sebastian
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See 
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html





www.biotronik.com




BIOTRONIK GmbH  Co. KG
Woermannkehre 1, 12359 Berlin, Germany
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin, Registergericht: Berlin HRA 6501

Vertreten durch ihre Komplementärin:
BIOTRONIK Mess- und Therapiegeräte GmbH
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin, Registergericht: Berlin HRB 2918
Geschäftsführer: Dr. Max Schaldach, Christoph Böhmer, Dr. Werner Braun, 
Dr. Lothar Krings


This email and the information it contains including attachments are 
confidential and meant only for use by the intended recipient(s); 
disclosure or copying is strictly prohibited. If you are not addressed, 
but in the possession of this email, please notify the sender immediately 
and delete the document.

-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

server side ip pool management problem

2007-04-03 Thread ahissi jean-françois
ahissi jean-françois a écrit :
 Hello,

 I need help!

 I have a freeradius server 1.1.3 with mysql 4.1.11 backend
 and we manage ip address pools with the NAS (Redback SMS), it works fine.

 Now we need to have subscribers groups with particular ip address  
 pools  for
 each group.

 I don't how to configure it with the NAS so i want to manage this with 
 freeradius
 but i don't exactly know how to configure it with users file because i 
 think that i can't use
 at the same time mysql database and users file.

 thanks for your help!



- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE : RE : RE : IP Pool management and Re-authentication

2007-03-22 Thread Thibault Le Meur

 
  Thibault Le Meur wrote:
   I've patched the radiusplugin to add Framed-IP-Address to
  the re-auth
   request but rlm_ippool still allocates a new IP Address
  (I'm using FR
   1.1.4).
  
Ok.  It seems like rlm_ippool should be updated to look for
  Framed-IP-Address in the request.
  
That would be very useful, and would solve the problem
  you're seeing.
  
Alan DeKok.
 
 Do you mean updated (to 1.1.5) or patched ?

Never mind I found the answer by looking at the code from rlm_ippool.c.

Currently, when an Access-Request arrives, rlm_ippool:
* looks in the pool for an 'active' entry (flagged as active) with the
key=NAS-IP/NAS-port
* If no entry is found
  == rlm_ippool allocates an @IP from the pool
* If an active entry is found
  == it is considered as a stale entry and is marked as not active
(active=0)
  == then a new IP is allocated

If rlm_ippool is 'updated' to take Framed-IP-Address into account what
shoudl be the behaviour ?

A simple patch would consist of doing nothing at Post-Auth time if the
request contains a Framed-IP-Address.

A more complex patch should handle several different cases and decide what
to do. For instance:
* when Access-Request is received, look for an active entry in the pool with
the search key NAS-IP/NAS-port
* If no entry is found
  * If there is No Framed-IP-Address attribute in the Request
== allocate a new @IP from the pool
  * If there is a Framed-IP-Address attribute in the Request
* If the Framed-IP-Address belongs to the IP-range of the pool (but it
is not assigned to this NAS-IP/NAS-port)
== then issue a warning log (especially if this IP is allocated to an
active entry for another NAS-IP/NAS-port)
== do not allocate a new @IP ??? (Or should we enforce a new IP,
without beeing sure the NAS will be able to use it ?)
* If the Framed-IP-Address doesn't belong to the IP-range of the pool
== do not allocate a new @IP
* If an entry is found (there is already an allocated @IP for this
NAS-IP/NAS-port)
  * If there is a Framed-IP-Address attribute in the Request
* If this Framed-IP-Address is the same as the allocated IP from the
entry found
  == then do nothing (no stale marking, no new @IP allocation)
* If this Framed-IP-Address is NOT the same as the allocated IP from the
entry found
  == then mark the current entry as staled (active=0)
  == report an error in the log because something went wrong
(especially if the Framed-IP-Address received is allocated to another
NAS-IP/NAS-port entry in the pool)
  == do not allocate a new @IP
  * If there is No Framed-IP-Address attribute in the Request
  == then mark the current entry as staled (active=0)
  == allocate a new @IP

What do you think ?

Is it already done in current developpement tree ?

Regards,
Thibault Le Meur



- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Solution: IP Pool management and Re-authentication

2007-03-22 Thread Thibault Le Meur
 Thibault Le Meur wrote:
  I've patched the radiusplugin to add Framed-IP-Address to 
 the re-auth 
  request but rlm_ippool still allocates a new IP Address 
 (I'm using FR 
  1.1.4).
 
   Ok.  It seems like rlm_ippool should be updated to look for 
 Framed-IP-Address in the request.
 
   That would be very useful, and would solve the problem 
 you're seeing.
 
   Alan DeKok.

For those interested in an interim solution, here is a workaround:

1- make sure your NAS sends a Framed-IP-Address attribute in the
Access-Request when a re-authentication is performed (that is to say for
openvpn, use a patched version of radiusplugin)

2- Setup 2 Post-Auth-Types in the post-auth section:

Post-Auth-Type postauth.ovpn {
Ovpn_Main_Pool
reply_log
}

Post-Auth-Type postauth.ovpn.reauth {
reply_log
}

3- in the users file (for instance) dispatch incomming Access-Requests based
on the presence of the Framed-IP-Address attribute:

DEFAULT Framed-IP-Address !* Any, Huntgroup-Name == srvs-vpn-ovpn,
Post-Auth-type := postauth.ovpn
Fall-Through = no

DEFAULT Framed-IP-Address =* Any, Huntgroup-Name == srvs-vpn-ovpn,
Post-Auth-type := postauth.ovpn.reauth
Fall-Through = no


Thanks Alan for your help,

Regards,
Thibault



- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE : IP Pool management and Re-authentication

2007-03-21 Thread Thibault Le Meur
Hi Alan,

   I'd like to patch the openvpn-radiusplugin so that an extra
  attribute
   is sent in the Access-Accept packets so that FR will be able to
   differentiate Initial and Renegociation Access-Accept 
 requests and 
   only assign new IP address from the pool on Initial Access-Accept 
   requests.
  
I think you mean Access-Request packet.
 
 Sorry for the mistake, I meant Access-Request of course
 
   If it doesn't have
  a Framed-IP-Address attribute, FreeRADIUS can allocate  send 
  one in an Access-Accept.
   If openvpn re-authenticates a 
  session with an existing IP address, it should send 
  Framed-IP-Address in the Access-Request.
 
 I get you right, my patch may be as easy as to make 
 radiusplugin add the Framed-IP-Address attribute in the 
 Access-Request packet with the already assigned IP Address 
 when it is a renegotiation.

I've patched the radiusplugin to add Framed-IP-Address to the re-auth
request but rlm_ippool still allocates a new IP Address (I'm using FR
1.1.4).

I can see this in radiusd -X:
modcall: entering group postauth.ovpn for request 3
rlm_ippool: Searching for an entry for nas/port: 192.168.1.1/1
rlm_ippool: Found a stale entry for ip/port: 10.1.1.1/1
rlm_ippool: num: 0
rlm_ippool: Searching for an entry for nas/port: 192.168.1.1/1
rlm_ippool: Allocating ip to nas/port: 192.168.1.1/1
rlm_ippool: num: 1
rlm_ippool: Allocated ip 10.1.1.2 to client on nas 192.168.1.1,port 1
  modcall[post-auth]: module Ovpn_Main_Pool returns ok for request 3

Where:
* 192.168.1.1 is the NAS IP Address
* 10.1.1.1 is the IP address allocated at connection time
* 10.1.1.2 is the IP address allocated at re-authentication time

Maybe I didn't understand you well: 
* Is rlm_ippool supposed to return NOOP if a Framed-IP-Address attribute is
present in the Request ?
OR
* is it up to me to bypass the rlm_ippool (by setting another
Post-Auth-Type) when a Re-Auth Request is performed (that is to say when a
Framed-IP-Address attribute is present in the Request) ?

Thanks in advance,
Thibault


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: RE : IP Pool management and Re-authentication

2007-03-21 Thread Alan DeKok
Thibault Le Meur wrote:
 I've patched the radiusplugin to add Framed-IP-Address to the re-auth
 request but rlm_ippool still allocates a new IP Address (I'm using FR
 1.1.4).

  Ok.  It seems like rlm_ippool should be updated to look for
Framed-IP-Address in the request.

  That would be very useful, and would solve the problem you're seeing.

  Alan DeKok.
--
  http://deployingradius.com   - The web site of the book
  http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog
- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE : RE : IP Pool management and Re-authentication

2007-03-21 Thread Thibault Le Meur

 Thibault Le Meur wrote:
  I've patched the radiusplugin to add Framed-IP-Address to 
 the re-auth 
  request but rlm_ippool still allocates a new IP Address 
 (I'm using FR 
  1.1.4).
 
   Ok.  It seems like rlm_ippool should be updated to look for 
 Framed-IP-Address in the request.
 
   That would be very useful, and would solve the problem 
 you're seeing.
 
   Alan DeKok.

Do you mean updated (to 1.1.5) or patched ?

I made a quick diff between rlm_ippool.c from 1.1.4 and 1.1.5 and I can't
see any difference so I think the problem I'm seeing is still present in
1.1.5.

Regards,
Thibault


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: RE : RE : IP Pool management and Re-authentication

2007-03-21 Thread Jan Mulders

I've been using OpenVPN + Ralf's Radiusplugin for several months and
recently moved away from server-side IP assignment. However, while I did use
it, I found that in my configuration FreeRADIUS only assigned new IPs when
the accounting for that user had stopped (ie, if it recieved a STOP packet).
This meant, that once I'd crashed the openvpn server 3 times with users on
it :-) there were many IP's who were 'lost' - their sessions had never
ended, hence the IP was never returned to the pool.

I was doing renegotiation every 20 minutes if I remember correctly, and the
freeradius replied with the same IP for the user time and time again. Hence,
I'm beginning to wonder if it's configuration-specific, because I didn't
have any problems.

Hope this helps,

Jan

On 21/03/07, Thibault Le Meur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 Thibault Le Meur wrote:
  I've patched the radiusplugin to add Framed-IP-Address to
 the re-auth
  request but rlm_ippool still allocates a new IP Address
 (I'm using FR
  1.1.4).

   Ok.  It seems like rlm_ippool should be updated to look for
 Framed-IP-Address in the request.

   That would be very useful, and would solve the problem
 you're seeing.

   Alan DeKok.

Do you mean updated (to 1.1.5) or patched ?

I made a quick diff between rlm_ippool.c from 1.1.4 and 1.1.5 and I can't
see any difference so I think the problem I'm seeing is still present in
1.1.5.

Regards,
Thibault


-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

RE : IP Pool management and Re-authentication

2007-03-21 Thread Thibault Le Meur


quote
I've been using OpenVPN + Ralf's Radiusplugin for several months and
recently moved away from server-side IP assignment. However, while I did use
it, I found that in my configuration FreeRADIUS only assigned new IPs when
the accounting for that user had stopped (ie, if it recieved a STOP packet).
/quote

Curious this is not what I see here ??
What is/was your FR server version ?

Anyway, Alan said that a 'good nas' should send the Framed-IP-Address in the
Access-Request if it has been already assigned one: this wasn't done by
radiusplugin, thus I think I'll keep the pacth.

quote
 This meant, that once I'd crashed the openvpn server 3 times with users on
it :-) there were many IP's who were 'lost' - their sessions had never
ended, hence the IP was never returned to the pool. 
/quote

Sure, this is also true for my others NAS (pppd based), but they are quite
robust (I hope openvpn is/will be as robust ;-)).

quote
I was doing renegotiation every 20 minutes if I remember correctly, and the
freeradius replied with the same IP for the user time and time again.
/quote

Interesting, what could explain that mine allocate new IP addresses each
time ?

Should rlm_ippool allocate the same IP for a NAS-IP/NAS-port couple if the
entry isn't cleaned from the pool ?

(Anyway, I think it's better to have FR not re-send Framed-IP-Address since
it would cause an unsuseful write to the client-config file from the
radiusplugin.)

quote
 Hence, I'm beginning to wonder if it's configuration-specific, because I
didn't have any problems. 
/quote

I can trust you, but I don't know where to search for a setup mistake.

Does someone has an idea ?

Thanks in advance,
Thibault



- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


IP Pool management and Re-authentication

2007-03-20 Thread Thibault Le Meur
Hi,

I'm using a system (openvpn) with 'radiusplugin' to let FR authenticate
users and manage IP Pools.

Openvpn sometimes needs to renegotiate the connections and thus sends
authentication requests while the connection is still active (with an
already assigned IP address): this causes FR to assign a new IP address from
the pool (which seems normal since FR has no way to know this is a
renegotiation).

I'd like to patch the openvpn-radiusplugin so that an extra attribute is
sent in the Access-Accept packets so that FR will be able to differentiate
Initial and Renegociation Access-Accept requests and only assign new IP
address from the pool on Initial Access-Accept requests.

Do you know a standard Radius attribute that could be used for this ?
As far as you know, are there other NASes using such a quirk ? Does this
make sense ?

Thanks in advance,
Thibault



- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: IP Pool management and Re-authentication

2007-03-20 Thread Alan DeKok
Thibault Le Meur wrote:
 Openvpn sometimes needs to renegotiate the connections and thus sends
 authentication requests while the connection is still active (with an
 already assigned IP address): this causes FR to assign a new IP address from
 the pool (which seems normal since FR has no way to know this is a
 renegotiation).

  So why isn't the radiusplugin telling FreeRADIUS what the old IP
address was?

 I'd like to patch the openvpn-radiusplugin so that an extra attribute is
 sent in the Access-Accept packets so that FR will be able to differentiate
 Initial and Renegociation Access-Accept requests and only assign new IP
 address from the pool on Initial Access-Accept requests.

  I think you mean Access-Request packet.  If it doesn't have a
Framed-IP-Address attribute, FreeRADIUS can allocate  send one in an
Access-Accept.  If openvpn re-authenticates a session with an existing
IP address, it should send Framed-IP-Address in the Access-Request.

 Do you know a standard Radius attribute that could be used for this ?
 As far as you know, are there other NASes using such a quirk ? Does this
 make sense ?

  It makes sense.

  Alan DeKok.
--
  http://deployingradius.com   - The web site of the book
  http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog
- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE : IP Pool management and Re-authentication

2007-03-20 Thread Thibault Le Meur
Thanks for your reply,

 Thibault Le Meur wrote:
  Openvpn sometimes needs to renegotiate the connections and 
 thus sends 
  authentication requests while the connection is still 
 active (with an 
  already assigned IP address): this causes FR to assign a new IP 
  address from the pool (which seems normal since FR has no 
 way to know 
  this is a renegotiation).
 
   So why isn't the radiusplugin telling FreeRADIUS what the 
 old IP address was?

Because It's still beta ;-), I can fix this

  I'd like to patch the openvpn-radiusplugin so that an extra 
 attribute 
  is sent in the Access-Accept packets so that FR will be able to 
  differentiate Initial and Renegociation Access-Accept requests and 
  only assign new IP address from the pool on Initial Access-Accept 
  requests.
 
   I think you mean Access-Request packet.

Sorry for the mistake, I meant Access-Request of course

  If it doesn't have 
 a Framed-IP-Address attribute, FreeRADIUS can allocate  send 
 one in an Access-Accept.
  If openvpn re-authenticates a 
 session with an existing IP address, it should send 
 Framed-IP-Address in the Access-Request.

I get you right, my patch may be as easy as to make radiusplugin add the
Framed-IP-Address attribute in the Access-Request packet with the already
assigned IP Address when it is a renegotiation.

Thanks a lot Alan.

Regards,
Thibault


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


[Fwd: IP Pool management]

2006-07-21 Thread darshak
 Original Message 
Subject: IP Pool management
From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:Fri, July 21, 2006 10:16 am
To:  freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
--

Hi,
I am new to radius.
I want to understand functionality of IP Pool management and 802.1x,means
EAP,EAP-MD5,LEAP .

How can I customize the same using free radius ?


Thanxs to all
Darshak



- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE: Ip pool management

2005-03-03 Thread Sébastien Cantos
Yes you are right. Luaching the server in debug mode told me that Pool-name
is a check item and that it should be on the first line. The problem is that
it is complaining:
rlm_ippool: could not find Pool-Name attribute 

For my *newbie* understanding, if the Pool-name is a check item it should be
in the request I get from my clients. I'm true ? 
If yes, I can't modify the I got from the NAS (it's not mine). So is there a
way to use ippool without this check item ? 
Thanks for your help. 

Regards,
--
Sebastien Cantos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network / System Manager
Neopost DIVA 

 -Message d'origine-
 De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la 
 part de Alan DeKok
 Envoyé : mercredi 2 mars 2005 18:50
 À : freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
 Objet : Re: Ip pool management 
 
 Sébastien Cantos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I've followed instructions in radiusd.conf :
  My users file looks like this:
  DEFAULT Service-Type == Framed-User
  Pool-Name := osiris-pool,
 
   You did not follow the instructions in radiusd.conf.  The
 Pool-Name attribute should go on the first line.
 
   If you had run the server in debugging mode, the server would have
 told you this.
 
   Alan DeKok.
 
 
 - 
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See 
 http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
 


-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: Ip pool management

2005-03-03 Thread Alan DeKok
Sébastien Cantos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The problem is  that it is complaining:
 rlm_ippool: could not find Pool-Name attribute

  The *module* is printing that message because the Pool-Name
attribute is not found in the list of check items.

 For my *newbie* understanding, if the Pool-name is a check item it
 should be in the request I get from my clients.

  No.  Nothing in the server documentation would lead you to that
conclusion.  The documentation would lead you to the *correct*
conclusion, which is that the check items are not the request items.

  Alan DeKok.

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE: Ip pool management

2005-03-03 Thread Sébastien Cantos
Ok it works with :

DEFAULT Service-Type == Framed-User, Pool-Name := main_pool
Framed-Protocol = PPP,
Framed-MTU = 576

Thanks a lot for your help.

Kind Regards,
--
Sebastien Cantos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network / System Manager
Neopost DIVA 

 -Message d'origine-
 De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la 
 part de Alan DeKok
 Envoyé : jeudi 3 mars 2005 17:41
 À : freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
 Objet : Re: Ip pool management 
 
 Sébastien Cantos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  The problem is  that it is complaining:
  rlm_ippool: could not find Pool-Name attribute
 
   The *module* is printing that message because the Pool-Name
 attribute is not found in the list of check items.
 
  For my *newbie* understanding, if the Pool-name is a check item it
  should be in the request I get from my clients.
 
   No.  Nothing in the server documentation would lead you to that
 conclusion.  The documentation would lead you to the *correct*
 conclusion, which is that the check items are not the 
 request items.
 
   Alan DeKok.
 
 - 
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See 
 http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
 


-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE: Ip pool management

2005-03-02 Thread Sébastien Cantos
Hi,

I've followed instructions in radiusd.conf :
My users file looks like this:
DEFAULT Service-Type == Framed-User
Pool-Name := osiris-pool,
Framed-Protocol = PPP,
Framed-MTU = 576

And in my radiusd.conf I've:
post-auth {
#  Get an address from the IP Pool.
#   main_pool
osiris-pool
...
}

modules { 
...
ippool osiris-pool {
range-start = 192.168.52.1
range-stop = 192.168.52.254
netmask = 255.255.255.0
cache-size = 800
session-db = ${raddbdir}/db.ippool
ip-index = ${raddbdir}/db.ipindex
}
}

I get this error :
rlm_ippool: could not find Pool-Name attribute 

And my client doesn't get back the IP. 

I surely miss something  Could someone help me please ?

Regards,
--
Sebastien Cantos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network / System Manager
Neopost DIVA 

 -Message d'origine-
 De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la 
 part de Alan DeKok
 Envoyé : mardi 1 mars 2005 18:50
 À : freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
 Objet : Re: Ip pool management 
 
 Sébastien Cantos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I would like to configure my radius to give the first 
 available IP in the
  subnet 192.168.52.0/24 without carrying about the NAS modem number. 
  Is there a way to configure this ? 
 
   Read radiusd.conf.  Look for ippool
 
   Alan DeKok.
 
 - 
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See 
 http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
 


-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: Ip pool management

2005-03-02 Thread Alan DeKok
Sébastien Cantos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I've followed instructions in radiusd.conf :
 My users file looks like this:
 DEFAULT Service-Type == Framed-User
 Pool-Name := osiris-pool,

  You did not follow the instructions in radiusd.conf.  The
Pool-Name attribute should go on the first line.

  If you had run the server in debugging mode, the server would have
told you this.

  Alan DeKok.


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


IP Pool management into MySQL

2005-03-02 Thread David Manchado
Hello,

I'm working in a failover scenario where a NAS has two freeradius servers 
configured and in case of fail of the current radius active it will forward 
the querys to the backup radius. This is working fine with no problem.

The problem is that if I'm using DHCP I have to manage the pool in the NAS 
because freeradius stores the status of the pool locally. Is there a way to 
move ip pool mgmt into MySQL so in case of failure of the active, the backup 
radius can get the status of the pool?

Thanks in advance. Regards

-- 
David Manchado

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Ip pool management

2005-03-01 Thread Sébastien Cantos
Hi,

I've something like this in my user file:
DEFAULT Service-Type == Framed-User
Framed-Protocol = PPP,
Framed-MTU = 576,
Framed-IP-Address = 192.168.52.1+,
Framed-IP-Netmask = 255.255.255.0

I've noticed that the IP on the client side depends on the NAS modem number.
For example if modem is number 1 the IP is 192.168.52.1, is modem is number
10, ip is 192.168.52.10. 
I would like to configure my radius to give the first available IP in the
subnet 192.168.52.0/24 without carrying about the NAS modem number. 
Is there a way to configure this ? 


Regards,
--
Sebastien Cantos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network / System Manager
Neopost DIVA


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: Ip pool management

2005-03-01 Thread Alan DeKok
Sébastien Cantos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I would like to configure my radius to give the first available IP in the
 subnet 192.168.52.0/24 without carrying about the NAS modem number. 
 Is there a way to configure this ? 

  Read radiusd.conf.  Look for ippool

  Alan DeKok.

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html