[Freesurfer] creating roi
dear all, i want to get ROI in the naive space (for example STG) using freesurfer,i check the email list and find that command mri_extract_label may help, so i try it as follow, mri_extract_label aparc+aseg.mgz 1030 outli.mgz but i do not get the ROI i expect. do anyone know how can i get the ROI in naive space ？by other commands?by other software? many thanks~ qjli -- best wishes -- CCM计算医学中心 www.ccm.org.cn 中国科学院自动化研究所 Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences -- ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
[Freesurfer] comparing FS version 4.0 and FS versione 5.2
Hi all, I'm performing a follow-up longitudinal study in a group of patients. I have 2 brain MRIs per patient (T0 and T1 after 4 years). I'd like to know if I can analyse the T0 MRI with FS version 4.0 and compare these results with T1 MRI analyzed with FS version 5.2. Thanks, Irene Mattisi University Hospital of Padova, Italy. ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Re: [Freesurfer] creating roi
can you tell us what is wrong with the output? And are you trying to create a volume or surface ROI? What do you want to do with the ROI? On Fri, 13 May 2011, [UTF-8] ??? wrote: dear all, i want to get ROI in the naive space (for example STG) using freesurfer,i check the email list and find that command mri_extract_label may help, so i try it as follow, mri_extract_label aparc+aseg.mgz 1030 outli.mgz but i do not get the ROI i expect. do anyone know how can i get the ROI in naive space £¿by other commands?by other software? many thanks~ qjli ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Re: [Freesurfer] comparing FS version 4.0 and FS versione 5.2
Hi Irene sorry, no, that would be a biased analysis as there are differences (BTW: I assume you mean 5.1 - there is no 5.2 yet. Or 5.1 for that matter, although it is *almost* ready) cheers Bruce On Fri, 13 May 2011, irene@libero.it wrote: Hi all, I'm performing a follow-up longitudinal study in a group of patients. I have 2 brain MRIs per patient (T0 and T1 after 4 years). I'd like to know if I can analyse the T0 MRI with FS version 4.0 and compare these results with T1 MRI analyzed with FS version 5.2. Thanks, Irene Mattisi University Hospital of Padova, Italy. ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Re: [Freesurfer] comparing FS version 4.0 and FS versione 5.2
Hi Irene, I would of course also suggest to run the longitudinal stream ( see wiki) to improve results. Be aware that after 4 years you probably have all kinds of problems with your data (acquisition parameters, different calibration, different scanner software versions or even different hardware). This can change grey white contrast and other things significantly. In that case you can't really estimate and control that effect with only a single time point on either side and you might endup seeing anything in your results. Martin On May 13, 2011, at 6:02 AM, irene@libero.it irene@libero.it wrote: Hi all, I'm performing a follow-up longitudinal study in a group of patients. I have 2 brain MRIs per patient (T0 and T1 after 4 years). I'd like to know if I can analyse the T0 MRI with FS version 4.0 and compare these results with T1 MRI analyzed with FS version 5.2. Thanks, Irene Mattisi University Hospital of Padova, Italy. ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Re: [Freesurfer] display results on fsaverage / calculate area
Hi, No no, to take the average of the areas is not the same as take the average of the coordinates, because the areas depend quadratically on linear distances. An average of the areas would not necessarily represent a surface at the middle, most likely representing an (invisible) surface that would be closer to the white in some places and closer to the pial in others, depending on local folding. Hope this helps! yes - that helps and clarifies things. Thank you all for your help and patience, Boris On 2011-05-12, at 11:57 PM, Anderson Winkler wrote: Hi Boris, For now I am taking the geometric average between pial and white surface coordinates. Is that the right way to do it, or is there a more precise way? To obtain a surface that lies in the geometric middle between white and pial surfaces, it is correct to take the average of the coordinates. This surface is not guaranteed to coincide with any biologically meaningful cortical layer, but it has advantages over pial or white for not over/under-representing gyri or sulci. Also: If I decided to represent the stuff on the mid-surface, would it then also make sense to also take the average of pial.avg.area.mgh white.avg.area.mgh as the area estimation at each vertex? No no, to take the average of the areas is not the same as take the average of the coordinates, because the areas depend quadratically on linear distances. An average of the areas would not necessarily represent a surface at the middle, most likely representing an (invisible) surface that would be closer to the white in some places and closer to the pial in others, depending on local folding. Hope this helps! All the best, Anderson ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
[Freesurfer] Cerebellum segmentation, auto vs manual reference?
Hi, I've found some volume differences in the cerebellum between two groups I've been studying. I used freesurfer v4.5 to do the segmentation. I am looking for a reference to justify the use of Freesurfer and to say that it compares well with manual tracing of the cerebellum but I'm struggling to find a paper with that data. Can anyone comment or point me in the right direction? The Fischl et al 2002 Neuron paper has a comparison of most subcortical regions but doesn't include the cerebellum and other papers I've seen by Makris et al 03' and 05' looks to employ a more involved and detailed approach for the cerebellum rather than only running Freesurfer's recon-all process. Many Thanks John This message may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient please inform the sender that you have received the message in error before deleting it. Please do not disclose, copy or distribute information in this e-mail or take any action in reliance on its contents: to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your co-operation. NHSmail is the secure email and directory service available for all NHS staff in England and Scotland NHSmail is approved for exchanging patient data and other sensitive information with NHSmail and GSi recipients NHSmail provides an email address for your career in the NHS and can be accessed anywhere For more information and to find out how you can switch, visit www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/nhsmail ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
[Freesurfer] Segmentation Fault
Hi all, We are trying to run individual analyses on several subjects, and we keep getting a 'Segmentation Fault.' We have run other subjects with the same command a while ago, and the command worked fine at that time. Do you have any idea what would be causing this error? The output is included below: Command: selxavg3-sess -analysis mandyrh3 -fwhm -s PBMCT15 Subjects Dir: /cluster/manoach/milton/subjects FreeSurfer v. Stable 5 Session: /autofs/cluster/manoach/milton/subjects/PBMCT15 Fri May 13 12:21:58 EDT 2011 Run: 012 Fri May 13 12:21:58 EDT 2011 Update not needed Fri May 13 12:21:58 EDT 2011 register-sess completed PBMCT15 MC - mc-sess -fstem f -fmcstem fmcpr -s PBMCT15 -d /autofs/cluster/manoach/milton/subjects -fsd bold -rlf task -per-run -nolog -update Logfile is /dev/null --- /autofs/cluster/manoach/milton/subjects/PBMCT15 RunList: 012 --- ** --- --- Motion Correcting Run 012 --- --- ** --- sess = PBMCT15 Fri May 13 12:21:58 EDT 2011 mc-afni2 --i 012/f.nii --t 012/template.nii --o 012/fmcpr.nii.gz --mcdat 012/fmcpr.mcdat /autofs/cluster/manoach/milton/subjects/PBMCT15/bold mri_info --nframes --o /tmp/mriinfo.3377 012/template.nii log file is 012/fmcpr.nii.gz.mclog mcdat file is 012/fmcpr.mcdat tmp dir is 012/tmp.mc-afni2.3377 #@# /autofs/cluster/manoach/milton/subjects/PBMCT15/bold mri_convert 012/template.nii 012/tmp.mc-afni2.3377/tempvol.nii.gz --nskip 0 --ndrop 0 -odt float mri_convert 012/template.nii 012/tmp.mc-afni2.3377/tempvol.nii.gz --nskip 0 --ndrop 0 -odt float nskip = 0 ndrop = 0 $Id: mri_convert.c,v 1.179.2.1 2011/03/22 16:37:02 nicks Exp $ reading from 012/template.nii... TR=3000.00, TE=0.00, TI=0.00, flip angle=0.00 i_ras = (-0.998297, -0.0395807, 0.0428535) j_ras = (0.0411249, -0.998513, 0.0357732) k_ras = (0.0413739, 0.0374746, 0.998441) changing data type from short to float (noscale = 0)... writing to 012/tmp.mc-afni2.3377/tempvol.nii.gz... #@# /autofs/cluster/manoach/milton/subjects/PBMCT15/bold mri_convert 012/f.nii 012/tmp.mc-afni2.3377/invol.nii.gz -odt float mri_convert 012/f.nii 012/tmp.mc-afni2.3377/invol.nii.gz -odt float Segmentation fault Thanks! Best, Chindhuri Selvadurai Psychiatric Neuroimaging, Manoach Lab Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, MGH Phone: (617)726-0307 ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Re: [Freesurfer] Temporal lobe tracing abnomality uncorrected by control points
Hi Ammar, if you adjust control points you should be running autorecon2-cp not -wm. cheers Bruce On Fri, 13 May 2011, Moiyadi, Ammar wrote: Hi I attached the log file for this subject. I tried adjusting control points and performing autorecon2-wm in repeated iterations. It helped a little but I still am missing a large chunk of both gray and white temporal matter. I'm not sure how many iterations it will take to get a complete tracing but it doesn't seem to be helping as much as the initial few runs. Ammar Moiyadi, BS Professional Research Assistant Psychiatry, School of Medicine 303-724-5490 From: Bruce Fischl [fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 6:01 PM To: Moiyadi, Ammar Subject: RE: [Freesurfer] Temporal lobe tracing abnomality uncorrected by control points can you send us the recon-all.log file for that subject? And make sure to cc the list on your replies so others can help! Bruce On Tue, 10 May 2011, Moiyadi, Ammar wrote: Hi Bruce - The image is of the brainmask.mgz file. I have attached another image showing the wm.mgz file - you're right, the wm regions where I placed the control groups is very dark if not absent. I still don't understand why the proper gray matter boundaries were not obtained however. I did run autorecon2-wm after adding the control points but I will run it again just in case. Thanks for your help, Ammar From: Bruce Fischl [fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 2:34 PM To: Moiyadi, Ammar Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Temporal lobe tracing abnomality uncorrected by control points what image are you displaying in this png? If it is one of the brain*.mgz then your control points aren't working as the wm is still very dark where you place them. Did you run autorecon2-wm after putting the control points in? On Tue, 10 May 2011, Moiyadi, Ammar wrote: Dear Freesurfers, Freesurfer's autorecon is having trouble tracing both gray and white matter boundaries in the temporal region of one of my subjects (even after I added control points for the white matter). I have attached a png screen shot of this abnormality and was wondering if anyone has any ideas to correct this since I have never seen such a large tracing error before. Your input is much appreciated! Ammar The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Re: [Freesurfer] Pial surface error
Hi Mario, I'm not sure what an N4 correction is, but the Freesurfer team helped me to solve the problem. Here are their instructions: Sometimes when the skullstrip is wrong, it affects the surfaces even if the wm parcellation is correct. I ran -skullstrip with the watershed parameter of 30, and then reran the subject with -autorecon2 -autorecon3. You can find info how how to run watershed here: http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/SkullStripFix http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/SkullStripFixI hope this helps! I can send over our full conversation if this doesn't give you the information you need. Allie On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Mario Ortega mario.ort...@gmail.comwrote: HI Allie, I am having this exact issue, and I was able to fix only a few of them, Did the Freesurfer team ever give you a reliable fix? I used an N4 correction before the entire FS process. -Mario On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Allie Rosen rosen.al...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, Do you want me to email you in a few days about this? Allie On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Khoa Nguyen k...@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduwrote: Got it. I'll look at it and get back to you. On Tue, 19 Apr 2011, Allie Rosen wrote: Hi, http://dl.dropbox.com/u/14127241/C42.tar.gz Here is the link to the subject. I hope this works!! Allie On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Khoa Nguyen k...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: Another way you can try is upload it to your google doc account and send me the link. Someone did that before. On Tue, 19 Apr 2011, Allie Rosen wrote: Hi, No, I'm not from the centre. I'm working on putting the files in Dropbox and sending you a link to them, because apparently I don't have ftp access. Allie On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Khoa Nguyen k...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: Are you from the center? If so you can just cd into /space/outgoing and copy your file there. If not, you can follow the instructions in the box at the top using a terminal. On Tue, 19 Apr 2011, Allie Rosen wrote: Hi, I'm really sorry, but I don't understand those instructions. Do I login to the freesurfer website? Or do I login through a terminal somehow? Do I type the stuff in the boxes into the terminal? Thanks, Allie On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Khoa Nguyen k...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: Hi Allie, You can compress the subject dir and upload it following the instructions here http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FtpFileExchange On Tue, 19 Apr 2011, Allie Rosen wrote: Hi Khoa, How do I upload subjects? Thanks, Allie On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Khoa Nguyen k...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: Hi Allie, Can you upload the subject? I'll take a look and see if I can figure out what's wrong. -Khoa On Tue, 19 Apr 2011, Allie Rosen wrote: Hi, This (recon-all after wm.mgz and brainmask.mgz edits) didn't work. The part that wasn't included in the pial or white matter surfaces is still not included. The intensities in the white matter regions are no different than in white matter regions that were included in the white matter. Any other suggestions? Thanks, Allie On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Allie Rosen rosen.al...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bruce, I am running recon-all tonight using wm voxels that I manually added (I also edited brainmask.mgz to add missing grey matter). To me it doesn't really look like a case of the white matter not having a high enough intensity. It simply looks like the whole lobe was ignored, regardless of intensity. But I'll check tomorrow to see if the intensity is low. Thanks, Allie On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduwrote: What is the intensity of the white matter in the regions you drew in? A couple of control points might help if it is less than 110 On Apr 18, 2011, at 12:36 PM, Allie Rosen rosen.al...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Sita, Thanks for all the responses! I've actually had the same problem for multiple subjects. I'm using version 5.0.0. I'll try fixing the cerebellum as well. I've attached pictures of where I am adding wm voxels. They aren't really in the same places as in the online tutorials. Could you take a quick look to see if they're in the right place? Thanks, Allie On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Sita Kakunoori s...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu s...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote: Hi Allie, pial surface which looks like this can only be corrected by correcting the wm.mgz. Also I would suggest to try and fix the cerebellum and see if it corrects the surfaces as well. Since part of the cerebellum is stripped off, it's probably affecting the segmentation as well but I could be wrong. what version of freesurfer are you using. Sita. On Mon, 18 Apr 2011, Allie Rosen wrote: Hi Sita, Can I still add
Re: [Freesurfer] Cerebellum segmentation, auto vs manual reference?
You might want to take at look at the following article. Bigler ED, Abildskov TJ, Wilde EA, et al. Diffuse damage in pediatric traumatic brain injury: a comparison of automated versus operator-controlled quantification methods. Neuroimage 2010;50:1017-26. Cerebellar GM volumes were similar between analysis methods, whereas cerebellar WM volumes differed (likely due to differing boundary inclusion/exclusion criteria and challenges for image quantification due to the numerous folia of the cerebellum). Hope this helps. Tricia Merkley --- On Fri, 5/13/11, McLean John (NHS Greater Glasgow Clyde) johnmcl...@nhs.net wrote: From: McLean John (NHS Greater Glasgow Clyde) johnmcl...@nhs.net Subject: [Freesurfer] Cerebellum segmentation, auto vs manual reference? To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Date: Friday, May 13, 2011, 7:01 AM Hi, I’ve found some volume differences in the cerebellum between two groups I’ve been studying. I used freesurfer v4.5 to do the segmentation. I am looking for a reference to justify the use of Freesurfer and to say that it compares well with manual tracing of the cerebellum but I’m struggling to find a paper with that data. Can anyone comment or point me in the right direction? The Fischl et al 2002 Neuron paper has a comparison of most subcortical regions but doesn’t include the cerebellum and other papers I’ve seen by Makris et al 03’ and 05’ looks to employ a more involved and detailed approach for the cerebellum rather than only running Freesurfer’s recon-all process. Many Thanks John This message may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient please inform the sender that you have received the message in error before deleting it. Please do not disclose, copy or distribute information in this e-mail or take any action in reliance on its contents: to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your co-operation. NHSmail is the secure email and directory service available for all NHS staff in England and Scotland NHSmail is approved for exchanging patient data and other sensitive information with NHSmail and GSi recipients NHSmail provides an email address for your career in the NHS and can be accessed anywhere For more information and to find out how you can switch, visit www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/nhsmail -Inline Attachment Follows- ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Re: [Freesurfer] creating roi
I want to do some parcellation on the temporal lobe,so i think I should create a volume ROI. there is no error in freesufer,but I dont know whether freesurfer can do this and how?Atlas-based way to get ROI is OK,but it is not precise enough. Can you give me some suggestions? thanks~ On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Bruce Fischl fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduwrote: can you tell us what is wrong with the output? And are you trying to create a volume or surface ROI? What do you want to do with the ROI? On Fri, 13 May 2011, [UTF-8] ??? wrote: dear all, i want to get ROI in the naive space (for example STG) using freesurfer,i check the email list and find that command mri_extract_label may help, so i try it as follow, mri_extract_label aparc+aseg.mgz 1030 outli.mgz but i do not get the ROI i expect. do anyone know how can i get the ROI in naive space ？by other commands?by other software? many thanks~ qjli ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. -- best wishes -- CCM计算医学中心 www.ccm.org.cn 中国科学院自动化研究所 Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences -- ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
