[FRIAM] the entirety of the quantum condition exists within a subset of Newtonian mechanics... The Quantum Condition and an Elastic Limit, free full text, 2014 Frank Znidarsic PE: Rich Murray 2015.02.
the entirety of the quantum condition exists within a subset of Newtonian mechanics... The Quantum Condition and an Elastic Limit, free full text, 2014 Frank Znidarsic PE: Rich Murray 2015.02.05 http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2015/02/the-entirety-of-quantum-condition.html This author suggests that this extension analysis may demonstrate that the entirety of the quantum condition exists within a subset of Newtonian mechanics. http://benthamopen.com/CHEM/VOLUME/1/ http://benthamopen.com/FULLTEXT/CHEM-1-21 Open Chemistry Journal ISSN: 1874-8422 ― Volume 1, 2014 The Quantum Condition and an Elastic Limit Frank Znidarsic P.E. Registered Professional Engineer, State of Pennsylvania Abstract Charles-Augustin de Coulomb introduced his equations over two centuries ago. These equations quantified the force and the energy of interacting electrical charges. The electrical permittivity of free space was factored into Coulomb’s equations. A century later James Clear Maxwell showed that the velocity of light emerged as a consequence this permittivity. These constructs were a crowning achievement of classical physics. In spite of these accomplishments, the philosophy of classical Newtonian physics offered no causative explanation for the quantum condition. Planck’s empirical constant was interjected, ad-hoc, into a description of atomic scale phenomena. Coulomb’s equation was re-factored into the terms of an elastic constant and a wave number. Like Coulomb’s formulation, the new formulation quantified the force and the energy produced by the interaction of electrical charges. The Compton frequency of the electron, the energy levels of the atoms, the energy of the photon, the speed of the atomic electrons, and Planck’s constant, spontaneously emerged from the reformulation. The emergence of these quantities, from a classical analysis, extended the realm of classical physics into a domain that was considered to be exclusively that of the quantum. Keywords: Atomic radii, photoelectric effect, Planck’s constant, the quantum condition. Article Information Identifiers and Pagination: Year: 2014 Volume: 1 First Page: 21 Last Page: 26 Publisher Id: CHEM-1-21 DOI: 10.2174/1874842201401010021 Article History: Received Date: 26/06/2014 Revision Received Date: 28/07/2014 Acceptance Date: 02/09/2014 Electronic publication date: 28/11/2014 Collection year: 2014 © Frank Znidarsic P.E.; Licensee Bentham Open. Open-Access License: This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited. * Address correspondence to this author at 481 Boyer St, Johnstown Pa 15906, USA; Tel: 814 505 4638; E-mail: fznidar...@aol.com 1. INTRODUCTION One school of thought holds that the universe is constructed of continuous stuff. Newton’s laws of motion and Einstein’s theory of Special and General Relativity operate upon this continuum. Coulomb’s equation describes the continuous nature of the electrical field. Maxwell employed Coulomb’s equation and described the wavelike properties of light. Another school of thought holds that the universe is constructed of particle like things. These things were quantified with Planck’s empirical constant. Einstein used Planck’s constant and introduced the particle of light. Niels Bohr showed that an atom’s electrons reside in discrete particle like energy levels [1] The philosophy of quantum mechanics precisely describes the lumpiness of the quantum realm. This philosophy could not explain why the quantum realm was lumpy. Max Planck searched for a classical principle that would establish the state of the quantum. It has been over a century since Planck’s quest and no classical principle was discovered. The Copenhagen Interpretation of quantum physics was introduced in order to offer some explanation [2-4]. This interpretation describes a probability based reality. The everyday classical realm, of our experience, is only a subset of this mysterious reality. The classically wired human mind cannot intuitively grasp the condition of the quantum reality. This quandary has become the accepted norm. Znidarsic refactored Coulomb’s equation into the terms of an elastic constant Ke and a displacement Rc. The elasticity of the electron, like that of a rubber band, is greatest as it just begins to expand. It diminishes, from that maximum, with displacement. The Compton frequency, of the electron, emerges as this elasticity acts upon the mass of the electron. In general, the wave like properties of stuff emerge as a condition of this elastic constant. It was assumed that the electron has a classical limit to its elasticity. An electron expels the field of another through a process of elastic failure. The displacement, of the elastic discontinuity,
Re: [FRIAM] Google's Graveyard
Yep! Eat my Wheaties every morning. [sign me] Of The Silent Generation Nicholas S. Thompson Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology Clark University http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/ -Original Message- From: Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of glen Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 9:21 AM To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Google's Graveyard On 02/04/2015 04:18 PM, Owen Densmore wrote: Love this tweet: I'm really glad Google is so performance based in its product strategy. It's a far cry from wasteful and obsolete old school practices that pour lots of resources into a narrow channel, artificially maintaining zombie products. It seems akin to evolution, actually. The master has failed more times than the beginner has even tried. It also seems to reflect a new sense of the C2B relationship. The rejection of brand loyalty was a hallmark of GenX. Then the millenials made it fundamental to their ethos, even defining character by it. (Anyone wearing, say, a Coca-Cola branded product must be a tool... unless the irony is obvious... like a tattooed stick-boy wearing a CAT cap.) These days, anyone who openly or obviously _relies_ on a corporate product is (culturally, at least) an anachronism. This is the heart of the reactionary criticism of, say, Occupy protesters relying so much on Apple products. -- ⇒⇐ glen e. p. ropella I spend 'em as fast as they come FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
Re: [FRIAM] Google's Graveyard
On 02/04/2015 04:18 PM, Owen Densmore wrote: Love this tweet: I'm really glad Google is so performance based in its product strategy. It's a far cry from wasteful and obsolete old school practices that pour lots of resources into a narrow channel, artificially maintaining zombie products. It seems akin to evolution, actually. The master has failed more times than the beginner has even tried. It also seems to reflect a new sense of the C2B relationship. The rejection of brand loyalty was a hallmark of GenX. Then the millenials made it fundamental to their ethos, even defining character by it. (Anyone wearing, say, a Coca-Cola branded product must be a tool... unless the irony is obvious... like a tattooed stick-boy wearing a CAT cap.) These days, anyone who openly or obviously _relies_ on a corporate product is (culturally, at least) an anachronism. This is the heart of the reactionary criticism of, say, Occupy protesters relying so much on Apple products. -- ⇒⇐ glen e. p. ropella I spend 'em as fast as they come FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
Re: [FRIAM] Google's Graveyard
The desktop thingy was OK, and Wave looked promising, but really the only one I cared about was Sidewiki. -Arlo James Barnes FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
Re: [FRIAM] Google's Graveyard
It's only fair to say the google ecology is converging to some degree and is pretty useful. I did find the fail of their RSS reader problematic. OTOH: I find myself unwilling to rely on several of their products, preferring others that I think will last. Dropbox, for example for sync'ed storage rather than Google Drive. I guess I find Google schizophrenic. Apple has a similar issue, but based on failures of the past rather than simply dropping services. My guess iCloud will work, after the failures of their prior attempts. But I won't rely on it. -- Owen On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Nick Thompson nickthomp...@earthlink.net wrote: Yep! Eat my Wheaties every morning. [sign me] Of The Silent Generation Nicholas S. Thompson Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology Clark University http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/ -Original Message- From: Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of glen Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 9:21 AM To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Google's Graveyard On 02/04/2015 04:18 PM, Owen Densmore wrote: Love this tweet: I'm really glad Google is so performance based in its product strategy. It's a far cry from wasteful and obsolete old school practices that pour lots of resources into a narrow channel, artificially maintaining zombie products. It seems akin to evolution, actually. The master has failed more times than the beginner has even tried. It also seems to reflect a new sense of the C2B relationship. The rejection of brand loyalty was a hallmark of GenX. Then the millenials made it fundamental to their ethos, even defining character by it. (Anyone wearing, say, a Coca-Cola branded product must be a tool... unless the irony is obvious... like a tattooed stick-boy wearing a CAT cap.) These days, anyone who openly or obviously _relies_ on a corporate product is (culturally, at least) an anachronism. This is the heart of the reactionary criticism of, say, Occupy protesters relying so much on Apple products. -- ⇒⇐ glen e. p. ropella I spend 'em as fast as they come FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
Re: [FRIAM] Google's Graveyard
Google's products are highly intrusive. Whenever I use them I feel as though I'm a lab rat in somebody's experiment. http://www.google.com/policies/privacy/ On 2/5/15, Owen Densmore o...@backspaces.net wrote: It's only fair to say the google ecology is converging to some degree and is pretty useful. I did find the fail of their RSS reader problematic. OTOH: I find myself unwilling to rely on several of their products, preferring others that I think will last. Dropbox, for example for sync'ed storage rather than Google Drive. I guess I find Google schizophrenic. Apple has a similar issue, but based on failures of the past rather than simply dropping services. My guess iCloud will work, after the failures of their prior attempts. But I won't rely on it. -- Owen FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
