Re: [funsec] Don't mess with Canadians carrying sticks ...

2014-10-23 Thread Blanchard, Michael (InfoSec)
 If nothing else, remember that most of them have families that will grieve.
Those politicians need to lose an election.  Not a life.

Can't agree more!

Michael P. Blanchard
Principal Security Engineer, CISSP, GCIH, CCSA-NGX, MCSE
Cyber Security Services
EMC ² Corporation
32 Coslin Drive
Southboro, MA 01772


-Original Message-
From: funsec [mailto:funsec-boun...@linuxbox.org] On Behalf Of 
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 5:58 PM
To: noloa...@gmail.com
Cc: FunSec List; Rob Slade; infose...@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [funsec] Don't mess with Canadians carrying sticks ...

On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:02:14 -0400, Jeffrey Walton said:

 Politicians are usually corrupt to the core. They are more than happy
 to take money and peddle influence. I'd much rather see a politician
 killed, and I'm not sure I would bestow honors on someone who stopped
 it...

Would you bestow honors on the guys who stopped John Hinkly Jr before he
managed to get another bullet into Reagan?  How about if somebody had
stopped Lee Harvey Oswald or the guys who shot Ghandi and Benazir Bhutto?

Yes, many of them *are* corrupt, but jumping from there to Every single
one of them is so corrupt that they don't deserve an attempt to stop
an assassination shows something pretty sad about you.

If nothing else, remember that most of them have families that will grieve.
Those politicians need to lose an election.  Not a life.

___
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.


Re: [funsec] Don't mess with Canadians carrying sticks ...

2014-10-23 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 21:36:16 -0400, Jeffrey Walton said:

 Given that some politicians are more dangerous than terrorist, and we
 kill terrorist, then what should be done with politicians who commit
 crimes against the democracy and the citizens?

They should either lose elections, or they should end up in a criminal
court and given a fair trial, no matter *how* big a scum they are.

Saying that it's OK for random vigilantes to shoot at them means you've
basically given up the idea of the rule of law.


pgpdj2WiCxj_S.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

Re: [funsec] Don't mess with Canadians carrying sticks ...

2014-10-23 Thread Rich Kulawiec
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 01:04:00PM -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
 Saying that it's OK for random vigilantes to shoot at them means you've
 basically given up the idea of the rule of law.

Agreed.  I think this is apropos:

Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process
he does not become a monster.
--- Friedrich Nietzsche

---rsk
___
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.


Re: [funsec] Don't mess with Canadians carrying sticks ...

2014-10-23 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 1:04 PM,  valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
 On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 21:36:16 -0400, Jeffrey Walton said:

 Given that some politicians are more dangerous than terrorist, and we
 kill terrorist, then what should be done with politicians who commit
 crimes against the democracy and the citizens?

 They should either lose elections, or they should end up in a criminal
 court and given a fair trial, no matter *how* big a scum they are.

 Saying that it's OK for random vigilantes to shoot at them means you've
 basically given up the idea of the rule of law.
I think there's a critical flaw in your logic. I think its the
difference between theory and practice. The rule of law applies to
little folks like you and I; and does not appear to apply to the
oligarchy.

Until the law applies to everyone equally, I'm more than happy to find
satisfaction in the vigilantes.

Too big to jail FTW... Battle evil with a different kind of evil...
___
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.


[funsec] Don't mess with Canadians carrying sticks ...

2014-10-22 Thread Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon Hannah
http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/1034708-kevin-vickers-sergeant-at-arms-
shoots-a-shooting-suspect-in-ottawa/

==  (quote inserted randomly by Pegasus Mailer)
rsl...@vcn.bc.ca sl...@victoria.tc.ca rsl...@computercrime.org
Sometimes I think that the patron saint of lawyers ought to be
Pontius Pilate, for surely he said it best: What is truth?
- Sharyn McCrumb
victoria.tc.ca/techrev/rms.htm http://www.infosecbc.org/links
http://blogs.securiteam.com/index.php/archives/author/p1/
http://twitter.com/rslade
___
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.


Re: [funsec] Don't mess with Canadians carrying sticks ...

2014-10-22 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon 
Hannah rmsl...@shaw.ca wrote:
 http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/1034708-kevin-vickers-sergeant-at-arms-
 shoots-a-shooting-suspect-in-ottawa/

Not sure about this quote from the article, though:

Vickers is being described by many as a hero.

Politicians are usually corrupt to the core. They are more than happy
to take money and peddle influence. I'd much rather see a politician
killed, and I'm not sure I would bestow honors on someone who stopped
it...
___
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.


Re: [funsec] Don't mess with Canadians carrying sticks ...

2014-10-22 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:02:14 -0400, Jeffrey Walton said:

 Politicians are usually corrupt to the core. They are more than happy
 to take money and peddle influence. I'd much rather see a politician
 killed, and I'm not sure I would bestow honors on someone who stopped
 it...

Would you bestow honors on the guys who stopped John Hinkly Jr before he
managed to get another bullet into Reagan?  How about if somebody had
stopped Lee Harvey Oswald or the guys who shot Ghandi and Benazir Bhutto?

Yes, many of them *are* corrupt, but jumping from there to Every single
one of them is so corrupt that they don't deserve an attempt to stop
an assassination shows something pretty sad about you.

If nothing else, remember that most of them have families that will grieve.
Those politicians need to lose an election.  Not a life.


pgp5HH0PnMLWi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

Re: [funsec] Don't mess with Canadians carrying sticks ...

2014-10-22 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 5:57 PM,  valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
 On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:02:14 -0400, Jeffrey Walton said:

 Politicians are usually corrupt to the core. They are more than happy
 to take money and peddle influence. I'd much rather see a politician
 killed, and I'm not sure I would bestow honors on someone who stopped
 it...

 Would you bestow honors on the guys who stopped John Hinkly Jr before he
 managed to get another bullet into Reagan?
Reagan was not a good example. Six or so of his senior staff went to
jail after his presidency for their crimes. The investigations stopped
at Bush and Reagan (take a guess why...).

Bin Laden and friends were Reagan's Freedom Fighters. They were well
funded and well trained. We can thank Reagan and friends for the rise
of the nice folks who are trying to kill us, and who we're trying to
kill now.

Oh, and Reagan was an illegal arms dealer. I still remember Iran Contragate.

Hinckley did the right thing for the wrong reason. Hindsight being
20/20, the one bullet should have found its mark.

*

 Yes, many of them *are* corrupt, but jumping from there to Every single
 one of them is so corrupt that they don't deserve an attempt to stop
 an assassination shows something pretty sad about you.
Yes. I have no faith that the oligarchy can police itself. Their
actions and crimes become more brazen over time.

I'm more than happy to watch the vigilantes dispense justice. I
actually take great pleasure in it. When I see a corrupt politician
taken down, I say Awesome, that's one less we have to deal with. I'm
glad I was around to see it.

It really saddened me that Ted Kennedy lived so long. I wanted to see
him go sooner. He was a murderer, a liar and a cheat. Its a shame
justice never caught up with him.

*

 If nothing else, remember that most of them have families that will grieve.
 Those politicians need to lose an election.  Not a life.
Its unfortunate for the families. But at least they lived through the event.

You can look at it like collateral damage... Similar to the collateral
damage in the middle east from the allies (Australia, Canada, New
Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States)?

Remember, the allies are accidentally killing off entire families in
pursuit of their targets. They have no reservation in razing an entire
city block because a cell phone signals. Don't bother with details
like [0]...

In this perspective, a grieving politician's family pales in comparison.

*

Related: another great case study is William McKinley. Leon Czolgosz
should be celebrated as a hero.

Do you know why Czolgosz is a better choice? (It has to do with the
Robber Barons buying the election, how the political machinery tried
to tame Roosevelt, and the reforms that Roosevelt implemented after he
assumed the office).


Jeff

[0] THE NSA’S SECRET ROLE IN THE U.S. ASSASSINATION PROGRAM,
https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/02/10/the-nsas-secret-role/

___
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

Re: [funsec] Don't mess with Canadians carrying sticks ...

2014-10-22 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 5:57 PM,  valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
 On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:02:14 -0400, Jeffrey Walton said:

 Politicians are usually corrupt to the core. They are more than happy
 to take money and peddle influence. I'd much rather see a politician
 killed, and I'm not sure I would bestow honors on someone who stopped
 it...

 Yes, many of them *are* corrupt, but jumping from there to Every single
 one of them is so corrupt that they don't deserve an attempt to stop
 an assassination shows something pretty sad about you.
I should probably agree with you here. Not all of them deserve to be
punished. I would shed a tear for ones with political courage. But
they are very few and far between.

Here's another way to look at the penalty, though: politicians and
their friends commit crimes against the democracy and the people that
would make Bin Laden green with envy. The breadth and depth of their
crimes are unrivaled. Bin Laden himself could not pull off a crime
that affected 330+ million Americans and tore at the fabric of the
democracy.

Given that some politicians are more dangerous than terrorist, and we
kill terrorist, then what should be done with politicians who commit
crimes against the democracy and the citizens?
___
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.