[fw-general] Unofficial add-on classes repository
Hi! Could there be some place within Zend Framework sites where users could submit unofficial classes to use with Zend Framework. It seems that many people have done or are doing classes which not exist in Zend Framework (Form, Upload etc). And proposal process (which is good) is long process. This kind of "unofficial" repository could help many people until official Zend Framework library grows. Good and popular ones most likely would advance to proposal process and finally to official Zend Framework library. Any thoughts? Regards, Marko Korhonen -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Unofficial-add-on-classes-repository-tf3912648s16154.html#a11092985 Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Idea: Zend_Debug::dump $label default to __FILE__
On 13/06/2007, at 1:43 PM, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: -- Nick Lo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Wednesday, 13 June 2007, 01:28 PM +1000): One of the pains of using print_r() or var_dump() is the hunt to find the ones you forget to remove or edit out. With Zend_Debug::dump() the additional $label parameter allows you to go... Zend_Debug($wotsit, __FILE__); ...but only if you specify it. I wondered since unless given a value $label does nothing as to whether it could default to something like __FILE__ just to make Zend_Debug a little less typing and a little more useful than the PHP variations. Won't work. __FILE__ in that case would refer to the class file in which Zend_Debug lives, and it's incredibly difficult, if not impossible, to determine where the method was called from and what file contained that code. Agh of course, excuse my idiocy! Nick
Re: [fw-general] Idea: Zend_Debug::dump $label default to __FILE__
-- Nick Lo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Wednesday, 13 June 2007, 01:28 PM +1000): > One of the pains of using print_r() or var_dump() is the hunt to find > the ones you forget to remove or edit out. With Zend_Debug::dump() > the additional $label parameter allows you to go... > > Zend_Debug($wotsit, __FILE__); > > ...but only if you specify it. I wondered since unless given a value > $label does nothing as to whether it could default to something like > __FILE__ just to make Zend_Debug a little less typing and a little > more useful than the PHP variations. Won't work. __FILE__ in that case would refer to the class file in which Zend_Debug lives, and it's incredibly difficult, if not impossible, to determine where the method was called from and what file contained that code. -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney PHP Developer| [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zend - The PHP Company | http://www.zend.com/
[fw-general] Idea: Zend_Debug::dump $label default to __FILE__
One of the pains of using print_r() or var_dump() is the hunt to find the ones you forget to remove or edit out. With Zend_Debug::dump() the additional $label parameter allows you to go... Zend_Debug($wotsit, __FILE__); ...but only if you specify it. I wondered since unless given a value $label does nothing as to whether it could default to something like __FILE__ just to make Zend_Debug a little less typing and a little more useful than the PHP variations. Thanks, Nick
Re: [fw-general] viewRender filename-manipulation
-- Sebastian Krebs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Wednesday, 13 June 2007, 02:55 AM +0200): > Im using filenames like there are used for ZF-Classfiles and even for > Controller (eg IndexController) means: Directories and Filenames are all > first letter uppercase. But I see, that the viewRenderer himself only > take the module-, controller- and action-names like they are, without > any possibility to manipulate them. Action-names can be set, but the > module- and controller-names arent. My only way i currently see is to > overwrite the _translatespec-method (or something like that), but i > would prefer to use the original one, because its automatically > activated. When overwriting the viewRenderer i have to disable the > original one and integrate my own. You can register your custom ViewRenderer early, which will prevent the default one from registering, particularly if you use 'ViewRenderer' as the final portion of the class name (e.g., My_ViewRenderer): require_once 'Zend/Controller/Front.php'; require_once 'My/ViewRenderer.php'; Zend_Controller_Action_HelperBroker::addHelper(new My_ViewRenderer()); $front = Zend_Controller_Front::getInstance(); Remember, ZF components, particularly in the MVC layer, are expected to be subclassed. The sort of customization you outline is exactly the sort of justification I'd use for subclassing -- you want to slightly modify the behaviour of the class, but keep the majority the same. -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney PHP Developer| [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zend - The PHP Company | http://www.zend.com/
Re: [fw-general] Broken code when upgrading from 0.9.2 - 1.0
-- agatone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Tuesday, 12 June 2007, 02:28 PM -0700): > Somehow I don't understand the logic why would you auto-init VIEW for > complete project. Why such change? > What if I have only controller that handles request and redirects and I > don't need VIEW. Sure you could easly say TURN IT OFF, but what's the point > of TURNING ON things not knowing if people will need them at that point... Not using a view is not standard usage. It makes more sense to have something on by default if it's used in the major use cases and have the ability to turn it off for those use cases where it's not used, plain and simple. Zend_Controller is part of the *MVC* layer; most people I've talked to in the past six months have been wondering why there *hasn't* been better view integration. ;-) -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney PHP Developer| [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zend - The PHP Company | http://www.zend.com/
[fw-general] viewRender filename-manipulation
Hi. Im using filenames like there are used for ZF-Classfiles and even for Controller (eg IndexController) means: Directories and Filenames are all first letter uppercase. But I see, that the viewRenderer himself only take the module-, controller- and action-names like they are, without any possibility to manipulate them. Action-names can be set, but the module- and controller-names arent. My only way i currently see is to overwrite the _translatespec-method (or something like that), but i would prefer to use the original one, because its automatically activated. When overwriting the viewRenderer i have to disable the original one and integrate my own. So, see somebody a possibility to manipulate file- and directory-names within viewRenderer without overwriting it? I would prefer to leave the functionality like it is, because its comfortable :) greetz, Krebs
[fw-general] Examples for Presentation
Hy fellows... for the previous mentioned presentations I also made some examples... As examplefiles can not be integrated into slideshare I added them here for your convinience. All are showing I18N features and are for now not mentioned within the manual (as I wrote them from the scratch ;-) ) Greetings Thomas I18N Team Leader example14.php Description: application/php example1.php Description: application/php example2.php Description: application/php example3.php Description: application/php example4.php Description: application/php example5.php Description: application/php example6.php Description: application/php example7.php Description: application/php example8.php Description: application/php example9.php Description: application/php example10.php Description: application/php example11.php Description: application/php example12.php Description: application/php example13.php Description: application/php
Re: [fw-general] Broken code when upgrading from 0.9.2 - 1.0
Somehow I don't understand the logic why would you auto-init VIEW for
complete project. Why such change?
What if I have only controller that handles request and redirects and I
don't need VIEW. Sure you could easly say TURN IT OFF, but what's the point
of TURNING ON things not knowing if people will need them at that point...
tfk wrote:
>
> $controller->setParam('noViewRenderer', true);
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Broken-code-when-upgrading-from-0.9.2---1.0-tf3854139s16154.html#a11087511
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Zend Framework Presentation
Thomas, This looks very good! I feel even worse now, for not going there. Great work! Best, Andries Seutens http://andries.systray.be Thomas Weidner schreef: Hy fellows, I held an presentation about the Zend Framework some days ago. As not all of you where there... I want to share the presentation with you. You will find some generals about the Framework and some example about how to use I18N core details. If you are interested take a look at: http://www.slideshare.net/thomasw/phpbootcamp-zend-framework and play around with ZF... Greetings Thomas Weidner I18N Team Leader for ZF
Re: [fw-general] modular layout and routing
-- naioshi cozmicboy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Tuesday, 12 June 2007, 09:57 PM +0200):
> thank you for you explanation. Now it makes sense to me
> and I'll probably end up using just one module ('default')
> containing all the controllers (which I was wrongly
> referring to as modules; i have to get used to the
> terminology).
>
> The only think I will miss is not having the modular
> directory structure:
>
> app
> - default
> - accounts
> - library
> - forum
> - service
>
> instead I will have everything in one directory
>
> app
> - default (containing everything)
>
> But again, I think I can get used to that.
If any of your controllers start to seem unmanageable, or if you start
to notice that you could group related actions into separate
controllers, then you may still end up with your modular directory
structure. :-)
I definitely see the benefit of modules -- I was one of those pushing to
get them into the ZF MVC -- but I also think it's easy to abuse the
model. Unless you are planning on distributing the application as a
standalone module or creating a complex app with many screen types, in
most cases a single controller in the default module will suffice.
Something else to consider: you can always create these as modules with
a single index controller. Then create custom routing rules like the
following:
$forumRoute = new Zend_Controller_Router_Route(
'forum/:action/*',
array(
'module' => 'forum',
'controller' => 'index',
'action' => 'index' // default action
)
);
$router->addRoute('forum', $forumRoute);
However, this is more overhead in your bootstrap.
--
Matthew Weier O'Phinney
PHP Developer| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zend - The PHP Company | http://www.zend.com/
[fw-general] Zend Framework Presentation
Hy fellows, I held an presentation about the Zend Framework some days ago. As not all of you where there... I want to share the presentation with you. You will find some generals about the Framework and some example about how to use I18N core details. If you are interested take a look at: http://www.slideshare.net/thomasw/phpbootcamp-zend-framework and play around with ZF... Greetings Thomas Weidner I18N Team Leader for ZF
Re: [fw-general] modular layout and routing
Matthew,
thank you for you explanation. Now it makes sense to me
and I'll probably end up using just one module ('default')
containing all the controllers (which I was wrongly
referring to as modules; i have to get used to the
terminology).
The only think I will miss is not having the modular
directory structure:
app
- default
- accounts
- library
- forum
- service
instead I will have everything in one directory
app
- default (containing everything)
But again, I think I can get used to that.
Thanks again,
Naioshi
RE: [fw-general] RE: Many-to-many Relationship question
We have had a few similar feature requests for Zend_Db_Table
http://framework.zend.com/issues/browse/ZF-553
http://framework.zend.com/issues/browse/ZF-1182
In general, I have declined those feature requests. Zend_Db_Table
implements a specific pattern called Table Data Gateway, which does not
include support for all the SQL query clauses like WHERE, GROUP BY,
ORDER, etc.
If you need the flexibility of SQL, then you should probably use a SQL
query.
Regards,
Bill Karwin
> -Original Message-
> From: Jorisa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 7:47 AM
> To: fw-general@lists.zend.com
> Subject: [fw-general] RE: Many-to-many Relationship question
>
>
> Ok, then what If I would like to fetch all Xrefs, with
> status='likes'. As far as I know this isn't possible with the
> current api and I think this would be a pretty common action.
>
> for example
>
> $where = $db->quoteInto("status = ?", "loves");
> $friend->findDependentRowset('FoodXref', null, $where);
>
> Is this something I could post on the issue tracker as
> suggesion or is this generally a bad idea?
>
> Kind regards,
> Joris Aerts
>
>
>
> Bill Karwin wrote:
> >
> > Yes, in the current implementation of
> findManyToManyRowset(), none of
> > the columns from the FoodXref table are returned.
> >
> > This is because a Zend_Db_Table_Rowset always contains columns from
> > only one table.
> >
> > So you'll have to do the query another way, as you describe.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bill Karwin
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Jorisa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 4:39 AM
> > To: fw-general@lists.zend.com
> > Subject: [fw-general] Many-to-many Relationship question
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi, Suppose I've got 3 tables:
> >
> >
> > Friends
> > - id
> > - name
> >
> > Food
> > - id
> > - name
> >
> > FoodXref
> > - id
> > - friend_id
> > - food_id
> > - status
> >
> >
> >
> > Now I want to fetch what food some friend likes or not, so I do
> >
> >
> > $friend = $friendsFactory->fetchById(3);
> > $foodlist = $friend->findManyToManyRowset('Food', 'FoodXref');
> >
> >
> >
> > This way I get all the food linked to friend 3 by
> FoodXref. But what
> > if I want the status field from the xref table as well? (So
> I can get
> > Peter loves Pizza, Peter hates Salad)
> >
> > Is there a simple solution to accomplish this? Or do I
> need to fetch
> > the Xref table, and then get the friend's name for every row myself?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Joris Aerts
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > View this message in context: Many-to-many Relationship question
> >
> > 15
> > 4.html#a11039613>
> > Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive
> > at Nabble.com.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Many-to-many-Relationship-question-tf389
> 4110s16154.html#a11080212
> Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
Re: [fw-general] Is there a way to disable "echo", "print" inside a method
Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: Well, for many releases now, we've had the dispatcher wrapping the dispatched action with output buffering, so it's all being trapped in the response object already. It's not a good practice, however, to echo directly and rely on this. Probably the best way to get them out of the habit is through education. Stick an echo into a library somewhere that you know they'll use, and see if they can figure out what happened -- and then point out why what they're doing is no better. Now that's what I call geurila programming! :p Shaun
Re: [fw-general] Is there a way to disable "echo", "print" inside a method
-- Jakub Podhorský <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
(on Tuesday, 12 June 2007, 07:11 PM +0200):
> What about to start output buffering in preDispatch method and in postDispatch
> method clear this output and if there is any output in postDispatch you can
> log
> it with controller and action name
Ouput buffering is already used in the dispatcher to capture content
echo'd by the action and its constituents, so the only way to enforce
this would be to turn off output buffering
($front->setParam('disableOutputBuffer')), and then write your own
plugins.
> ━━━
>
> From: depace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 6:22 PM
> To: fw-general@lists.zend.com
> Subject: [fw-general] Is there a way to disable "echo", "print" inside a
> method
>
>
>
> This sounds little stupid but if it is possible then it will save my ass being
> skinned..
>
> the problem is while working in a team... the programmers instead of
> displaying
> the data through template they have a habit of echoing from the method
> itself...
> have to trace where are all those crazy echosss .
> so it has been a lil pain in ass ...
>
> it really is a pain to make people work in MVC .. dunno why is it so hard for
> people to understand it..
>
>
--
Matthew Weier O'Phinney
PHP Developer| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zend - The PHP Company | http://www.zend.com/
RE: [fw-general] Is there a way to disable "echo", "print" inside a method
What about to start output buffering in preDispatch method and in postDispatch method clear this output and if there is any output in postDispatch you can log it with controller and action name _ From: depace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 6:22 PM To: fw-general@lists.zend.com Subject: [fw-general] Is there a way to disable "echo", "print" inside a method This sounds little stupid but if it is possible then it will save my ass being skinned.. the problem is while working in a team... the programmers instead of displaying the data through template they have a habit of echoing from the method itself... have to trace where are all those crazy echosss . so it has been a lil pain in ass ... it really is a pain to make people work in MVC .. dunno why is it so hard for people to understand it..
Re: [fw-general] Is there a way to disable "echo", "print" inside a method
-- depace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Tuesday, 12 June 2007, 09:52 PM +0530): > This sounds little stupid but if it is possible then it will save my ass being > skinned.. > > the problem is while working in a team... the programmers instead of > displaying > the data through template they have a habit of echoing from the method > itself... > have to trace where are all those crazy echosss . > so it has been a lil pain in ass ... > it really is a pain to make people work in MVC .. dunno why is it so hard for > people to understand it.. Well, for many releases now, we've had the dispatcher wrapping the dispatched action with output buffering, so it's all being trapped in the response object already. It's not a good practice, however, to echo directly and rely on this. Probably the best way to get them out of the habit is through education. Stick an echo into a library somewhere that you know they'll use, and see if they can figure out what happened -- and then point out why what they're doing is no better. -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney PHP Developer| [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zend - The PHP Company | http://www.zend.com/
Re: [fw-general] Is there a way to disable "echo", "print" inside a method
depace wrote: This sounds little stupid but if it is possible then it will save my ass being skinned.. the problem is while working in a team... the programmers instead of displaying the data through template they have a habit of echoing from the method itself... have to trace where are all those crazy echosss . so it has been a lil pain in ass ... it really is a pain to make people work in MVC .. dunno why is it so hard for people to understand it.. Dude, tell them to stop doing that, there is no need! If they really wanna see something get them to log it with Zend_Log. No need for you to bend over backwards to accommodate them. Go teach them the ways of changes. If they're not willing to compromise, there's point going down the MVC route...well there is but it'll be more painful than necessary. Shaun
Re: [fw-general] Is there a way to disable "echo", "print" inside a method
On 6/12/07, depace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This sounds little stupid but if it is possible then it will save my ass being skinned.. the problem is while working in a team... the programmers instead of displaying the data through template they have a habit of echoing from the method itself... have to trace where are all those crazy echosss . so it has been a lil pain in ass ... it really is a pain to make people work in MVC .. dunno why is it so hard for people to understand it.. :D That sounds whack, but did you try if disabled_functions (or something like that) works on a per directory basis? Till
Re: [fw-general] Is there a way to disable "echo", "print" inside a method
the problem is while working in a team... the programmers instead of displaying the data through template they have a habit of echoing from the method itself... have to trace where are all those crazy echosss . so it has been a lil pain in ass ... You can't really disable echo/print but you could set output buffering so you capture everything echo'ed/print'ed and then you can decide what to do with it. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Products Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/
[fw-general] Is there a way to disable "echo", "print" inside a method
This sounds little stupid but if it is possible then it will save my ass being skinned.. the problem is while working in a team... the programmers instead of displaying the data through template they have a habit of echoing from the method itself... have to trace where are all those crazy echosss . so it has been a lil pain in ass ... it really is a pain to make people work in MVC .. dunno why is it so hard for people to understand it..
Re: [fw-general] modular layout and routing
-- naioshi cozmicboy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Tuesday, 12 June 2007, 05:19 AM +0200): > I'm new to ZF and I'm not sure which would be the optimal > layout and routing scheme for my application. > > I would like to have these modules: > > - default > - accounts > - news > - library > - forum > - service > > each module having some actions (example): > > - default (index, login, logout, sitemap, about, contact) > - accounts (index, detail, add, edit, delete) > - news (index, detail, add, edit, delete) > - library (index, detail, add, edit, delete) > - forum (index, detail, add, edit, delete) > - service (index, stats, backup) You're confusing modules with controllers. Controllers contain actions, while modules contain controllers. The above should all be controllers with the actions specified, in the default module. You want to segregate into modules when a given application starts needing multiple controllers in order to group its responsibilities. At the most basic level, you might have, for instance, a blog module with separate controllers like this: blog/ controllers/ ListController.php // various list actions -- by tag, by // year, by month, by day, etc. AdminController.php // for admin actions -- post, list // comments, etc. IndexController.php // fallback controller, handling viewing // individual posts, errors, etc. What I see based on your layout above are the following *controllers*: default/ controllers/ IndexController.php // could contain sitemap and about actions LoginController.php ContactController.php AccountsController.php NewsController.php LibraryController.php ForumController.php ServiceController.php In most sites, you'll probably simply create additional controllers under the default module; the relation they have is they all serve the same site. I'd likely only create a new module when, for code clarity, I need to group actions into multiple controllers, but consider them all part of the same application. A common rule of thumb I follow is that if a controller has more than 7 actions, I likely need to either refactor to fewer actions, or refactor into multiple controllers (and thus a module). -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney PHP Developer| [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zend - The PHP Company | http://www.zend.com/
[fw-general] Proposal: Zend_View Enhanced
Hi all, http://framework.zend.com/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=33071 Over the past few months I've had a lot of fun using the Zend Framework - kudos to all those involved. I complain a lot about ZF views, but that doesn't reflect my opinion on the whole framework (impressions to the contrary perhaps ;)). Back on track... I have submitted a proposal called "Zend_View Enhanced". If anyone's followed my blog since May, I've been talking a lot about Views and how I think they should be used. It's a whole bunch of wordy entries you can entertain yourself (or maybe send yourself to sleep) reading. The proposal revolves around adding some standard View Helpers and a handful of methods to Zend_View_Abstract. Helpers are generally preferable to lumping more stuff into Zend_View_Abstract... In combination they allow a developer to construct output more flexibly. To put the idea across, I've defined four pieces of functionality for this proposal: 1. Partials 2. Controllers 3. Layouts 4. Placeholders (Read the blog or Proposal for what these mean if you haven't seen the terms before.) These are in addition to the currently available stuff I call: 5. Includes (typical PHP include) 6. Response Segmentation (Zend_Controller_Response_Http named segments) 7. Same-Scope Partials (using Zend_View_Abstract::render() for extra sub-templates) Hopefully the Proposal makes for an interesting read. Not sure if its a direction everyone wants or feels is needed, but your feedback and critique is very welcome. I get the feeling these can get somewhat obscure, so bear in mind they are not intended to impinge on existing functionality and are intended as being completely backwards compatible. The only unavailable dependent behaviour are some Setters for ViewRenderer (as I submitted in #ZF-1545). Proposal is currently marked "Under Contruction" until ZF-1545 is resolved or given a good kick out a door. Any questions, kick them out there. Pádraic Brady http://blog.astrumfutura.com http://www.patternsforphp.com Ready for the edge of your seat? Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV. http://tv.yahoo.com/
[fw-general] recovering and editing from two tables.
Hi friends,
I have two tables "users" and "clients". But "users" and "clients" have the
same form (but some fields for one and some for the other).
When I add, its ok. But when I edit some, the information cames only from
the table clients (and fills it fields) but the information from the table
users doesn't came and don't fill its fields...
Here is the code I use to recovery:
$id = (int)$this->_request->getParam('id', 0);
// Recupera os dados do cliente
$clientes = $clientes->fetchRow('clie_id='.$id);
$clientes = $clientes->toArray();
extract($funcionarios);
$smarty->assign('clientes', $clientes);
// Recupera os dados de usuario (here is the problem)
$usuarios = $usuarios->fetchRow('usu_id='.$id);
$usuarios = $usuarios->toArray();
extract($usuarios);
$smarty->assign('usuarios', $usuarios);
Best regards,
José de Menezes
[fw-general] RE: Many-to-many Relationship question
Ok, then what If I would like to fetch all Xrefs, with status='likes'. As far
as I know this isn't possible with the current api and I think this would be
a pretty common action.
for example
$where = $db->quoteInto("status = ?", "loves");
$friend->findDependentRowset('FoodXref', null, $where);
Is this something I could post on the issue tracker as suggesion or is this
generally a bad idea?
Kind regards,
Joris Aerts
Bill Karwin wrote:
>
> Yes, in the current implementation of findManyToManyRowset(), none of
> the columns from the FoodXref table are returned.
>
> This is because a Zend_Db_Table_Rowset always contains columns from only
> one table.
>
> So you'll have to do the query another way, as you describe.
>
> Regards,
> Bill Karwin
>
>
>
>
> From: Jorisa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 4:39 AM
> To: fw-general@lists.zend.com
> Subject: [fw-general] Many-to-many Relationship question
>
>
>
> Hi, Suppose I've got 3 tables:
>
>
> Friends
> - id
> - name
>
> Food
> - id
> - name
>
> FoodXref
> - id
> - friend_id
> - food_id
> - status
>
>
>
> Now I want to fetch what food some friend likes or not, so I do
>
>
> $friend = $friendsFactory->fetchById(3);
> $foodlist = $friend->findManyToManyRowset('Food', 'FoodXref');
>
>
>
> This way I get all the food linked to friend 3 by FoodXref. But
> what if I want the status field from the xref table as well? (So I can
> get Peter loves Pizza, Peter hates Salad)
>
> Is there a simple solution to accomplish this? Or do I need to
> fetch the Xref table, and then get the friend's name for every row
> myself?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Kind regards,
> Joris Aerts
>
>
>
>
> View this message in context: Many-to-many Relationship question
> 4.html#a11039613>
> Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive
> at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Many-to-many-Relationship-question-tf3894110s16154.html#a11080212
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[fw-general] Problem with Zend_Session::rememberMe()?
So I am having a very strange issue that seems to involves
Zend_Session::rememberMe() and I believe Zend_Auth as well.
I am working with a fairly standard authentication/authorization setup using
the Zend Framework components and all was going very well. A user could
post their credentials, the system would look them up and create a Zend_Auth
identity using Zend_Auth_Adapter_DbTable. From that point the user was
logged in. I implemented the Zend_Session::rememberMe() functionality and
after a few adjustments, this worked perfectly (at this point, using ZF
0.9).
So here is my problem. It's been a few months, and I've noticed that
specifically the "remember me" functionality no longer works right. If a
user logs in, without checking the "remember me" box, everything is great.
If the "remember me" box is checked, the user is forwarded right back to the
login screen. That's it, no errors, nothing except the user isn't logged
in. Here is the remember me code:
// Check for remember me option
if (isset($data['remember_me']) && (int) $data['remember_me'] == 1) {
Zend_Session::rememberMe();
}
So this is what I know about the problem:
- I first noticed it while using 0.9.3 – the application is currently
updated to 1.0.0RC1 and the problem is still present
- After going through all the code and debugging, I know that when the
"remember me" box is checked, the user account is found, the
Zend_Auth_Adapter_DbTable finds and sets the correct user identity. And
everything is good, but upon redirecting to the secured pages, the identity
object is being wiped out somehow
- When the box is checked, the actual cookie is set…it just appears that
the Zend_Auth identity is wiped out
I even tried to create a brand new "blank" application test case using a
simple form and it appears to work, so I'm not convinced it is totally the
ZF to blame. But I have not changed any code related to this functionality
since it worked and now it just doesn't work. I know this is a specific
case, but if anyone would know of where else I could look to debug this or
if you've seen this before I could use the help. I don't feel that I
understand all the ins and outs of the MVC functionality to fully grasp
where in the whole request process that this Zend_Auth stuff could be
overridden or removed.
Thanks for any suggestions!
--
--
Peter McWilliams <><
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Problem-with-Zend_Session%3A%3ArememberMe%28%29--tf3908000s16154.html#a11080211
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[fw-general] Zend_Http_Client example - login / grab content
just played around with Zend_Http_Client. wanted to list the emails of a freemail provider. i'm new to the zend framwork and no php pro. so beware. the example works for gmx.net you have to change one ore two words for your local language. see code. with few changes this should work with every other website. what it does: get_page() retrieves a web-page. the third parameter is a array of post parameters. for a GET just leave it blank. print_page() displays -the request -the reponse with headers and body -"fingerprint" (just the form elements of a page. so you can easily see whats needed for a login ) extract_links() does exactly that. the regex is far from perfect. just a hack. it returns a two-dim array with href and link-text. find_link() finds a href/linktext combo in the link-array returnd by extract-links(). you need this, because the links are dynamic. just take the non-dynamic part and the link-text to get a certain link on the page. in this example, all the requested pages are combined on one page. doesn't look good, but you see whats really happening. hope this is helpful. comments and improvements welcome. mike http://mike55stuff.blogspot.com/2007/06/zendhttpclient-example.html code: http://mike55stuff.blogspot.com/2007/06/requestmethod-return-response-function.html -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Zend_Http_Client-example---login---grab-content-tf3907720s16154.html#a11079391 Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] CLI non-object error in Zend_Search_Lucene
Further to this, I discovered that commenting out the line does cause problems, and I believe the original issue was almost certainly an issue with my code. Sorry to hassle you with it. Jemima -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/CLI-non-object-error-in-Zend_Search_Lucene-tf3902126s16154.html#a11079390 Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Acl: Role not found in other controllers
thanks darby. i have temporarily solved it by putting the ACL Object inside
the Zend_Auth object - during authentication. i serialized $acl and then
unserialized when i need to do an isAllow()... im not sure if this is the
best approach but it works for me as of the moment
thanks for pointing out the plugins. i have so much to learn from ZF... i
will be experimenting with the Plugins first thing tomorrow... :)
Darby Felton wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> In AuthController.php you setup an ACL object, which goes out of scope
> at the end of the script and is destroyed at that time.
>
> In FooController.php you are creating a new and separate ACL object. Of
> course it does not have the information that the ACL object created in
> AuthController.php had - it's a different object! :)
>
> If you need the ACL object (or any other data stored in a user variable,
> for that matter) available across all your controllers, you must persist
> the data somewhere (e.g., the PHP session, a database). But this is
> probably not the best approach. I understand that people have had a lot
> of success with implementing a front controller plugin that implements
> authorization with preDispatch().
>
> For more information about creating a front controller plugin, please see:
>
> http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/zend.controller.plugins.html
>
> Hope this helps!
>
> Best regards,
> Darby
>
> wenbert wrote:
>> i have this in one of the controllers in my AuthController.php
>>
>> // set access controlls
>> // -
>> $acl = new Zend_Acl();
>>
>> //define resources
>> $acl->add(new Zend_Acl_Resource('admin_pages'));
>> $acl->add(new Zend_Acl_Resource('claim'));
>> $acl->add(new Zend_Acl_Resource('views'));
>> $acl->add(new Zend_Acl_Resource('reports'));
>> $acl->add(new Zend_Acl_Resource('research'));
>>
>> $roles = explode(' ',$data['group_names']);
>> foreach ($roles as $role) {
>> $myrole = new Zend_Acl_Role($role);
>> $acl->addRole($myrole);
>>
>> if ($role == 'admin') {
>> $acl->allow($myrole, 'admin_pages', array('admin_access'));
>> } elseif ($role == 'xxx') {
>> $acl->allow($myrole, array('claim', 'views', 'reports'),
>> array('create_claim', 'save_claim', 'close_claim', 'view'));
>> } elseif ($role == 'yyy') {
>> $acl->allow($myrole, array('research', 'views', 'reports'),
>> array('research_open', 'view'));
>> }
>> //echo $acl->isAllowed($role, null, 'research_open') ? "$role:
>> allowed" : "$role: denied";
>> }
>> // -
>>
>> BUT, i can't access the ACL in another FooController.php
>> Zend_Loader::loadClass('Zend_Acl');
>> Zend_Loader::loadClass('Zend_Acl_Role');
>> Zend_Loader::loadClass('Zend_Acl_Resource');
>> $acl = new Zend_Acl;
>> $acl->isAllowed('xxx', 'claim', 'create_claim') ? "myrole: allowed"
>> :
>> "myrole: denied";
>>
>> i get an error that says:
>> Fatal error: Uncaught exception 'Zend_Acl_Role_Registry_Exception' with
>> message 'Role 'xxx' not found'
>>
>> how would i access the stuff i created in my AuthController.php from in
>> other controllers/actions?
>> so that I can do this:
>> $acl->isAllowed('xxx', 'claim', 'create_claim') ? "myrole: allowed"
>> :
>> "myrole: denied";
>> in any part of my application?
>>
>> any reply will be appreciated :)
>> thanks
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Zend_Acl%3A-Role-not-found-in-other-controllers-tf3905692s16154.html#a11078854
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Acl: Role not found in other controllers
Hello,
In AuthController.php you setup an ACL object, which goes out of scope
at the end of the script and is destroyed at that time.
In FooController.php you are creating a new and separate ACL object. Of
course it does not have the information that the ACL object created in
AuthController.php had - it's a different object! :)
If you need the ACL object (or any other data stored in a user variable,
for that matter) available across all your controllers, you must persist
the data somewhere (e.g., the PHP session, a database). But this is
probably not the best approach. I understand that people have had a lot
of success with implementing a front controller plugin that implements
authorization with preDispatch().
For more information about creating a front controller plugin, please see:
http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/zend.controller.plugins.html
Hope this helps!
Best regards,
Darby
wenbert wrote:
> i have this in one of the controllers in my AuthController.php
>
> // set access controlls
> // -
> $acl = new Zend_Acl();
>
> //define resources
> $acl->add(new Zend_Acl_Resource('admin_pages'));
> $acl->add(new Zend_Acl_Resource('claim'));
> $acl->add(new Zend_Acl_Resource('views'));
> $acl->add(new Zend_Acl_Resource('reports'));
> $acl->add(new Zend_Acl_Resource('research'));
>
> $roles = explode(' ',$data['group_names']);
> foreach ($roles as $role) {
> $myrole = new Zend_Acl_Role($role);
> $acl->addRole($myrole);
>
> if ($role == 'admin') {
> $acl->allow($myrole, 'admin_pages', array('admin_access'));
> } elseif ($role == 'xxx') {
> $acl->allow($myrole, array('claim', 'views', 'reports'),
> array('create_claim', 'save_claim', 'close_claim', 'view'));
> } elseif ($role == 'yyy') {
> $acl->allow($myrole, array('research', 'views', 'reports'),
> array('research_open', 'view'));
> }
> //echo $acl->isAllowed($role, null, 'research_open') ? "$role:
> allowed" : "$role: denied";
> }
> // -
>
> BUT, i can't access the ACL in another FooController.php
> Zend_Loader::loadClass('Zend_Acl');
> Zend_Loader::loadClass('Zend_Acl_Role');
> Zend_Loader::loadClass('Zend_Acl_Resource');
> $acl = new Zend_Acl;
> $acl->isAllowed('xxx', 'claim', 'create_claim') ? "myrole: allowed" :
> "myrole: denied";
>
> i get an error that says:
> Fatal error: Uncaught exception 'Zend_Acl_Role_Registry_Exception' with
> message 'Role 'xxx' not found'
>
> how would i access the stuff i created in my AuthController.php from in
> other controllers/actions?
> so that I can do this:
> $acl->isAllowed('xxx', 'claim', 'create_claim') ? "myrole: allowed" :
> "myrole: denied";
> in any part of my application?
>
> any reply will be appreciated :)
> thanks
Re: [fw-general] modular layout and routing
Looks like you don't need modules at all. Modules have controller which have actions. Scrap modules and you have default controller, accounts controller etc. Cheers Karol naioshi cozmicboy wrote: > > each module having some actions (example): > > - default (index, login, logout, sitemap, about, contact) > - accounts (index, detail, add, edit, delete) > - news (index, detail, add, edit, delete) > - library (index, detail, add, edit, delete) > - forum (index, detail, add, edit, delete) > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/modular-layout-and-routing-tf3905241s16154.html#a11078505 Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Cache, storing objects
Thank you! On 6/6/07, Fabien MARTY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 2007/6/6, Johannes Schill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I have some trouble with Zend_Cache. > Im trying to store objects in my cache, but it seems like if everything isnt > stored. Is there anything wrong with the automatic serialization or am i > just missing something (probably doing something wrong as usual:) ) > [...] I think this piece of PHP manual could help you : --- In order to be able to unserialize() an object, the class of that object needs to be defined. That is, if you have an object $a of class A on page1.php and serialize this, you'll get a string that refers to class A and contains all values of variabled contained in $a. If you want to be able to unserialize this on page2.php, recreating $a of class A, the definition of class A must be present in page2.php. This can be done for example by storing the class definition of class A in an include file and including this file in both page1.php and page2.php. --- Regards, -- Fabien MARTY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [fw-general] Has someone gotten the same different results?
And is there some expert who could help me to find the cause?
Thanks in advance! Et Merci beaucoop!
Best regards,
David
Partout wrote:
>
> My question is about the zend_search_lucene. I have searched the index
> with below:
>
> "business controller" AND shanghai
>
> There is about 300 hits. But when I search with LUKE Toolbox again with
> the same phrase string, there is about only 7 results, and that is correct
> for my case. And, there is only 14 documents in my index containing
> "business controller" phrase.
>
> I need to know why the Luke toolbox's results is not the same with
> zend_search_lucence. Is there some configuration needed? I use the Zend
> 1.0.0 RC1, and my demo script is below:
>
> require_once 'Zend/Search/Lucene.php';
> $query = "\"business controller\" AND Shanghai";
> //Zend_Search_Lucene_Analysis_Analyzer::setDefault(new
> Zend_Search_Lucene_Analysis_Analyzer_Common_TextNum_CaseInsensitive());
> //Zend_Search_Lucene_Search_QueryParser::setDefaultOperator(Zend_Search_Lucene_Search_QueryParser::B_AND);
> $index = Zend_Search_Lucene::open('index');
> $hits = $index->find($query);
> echo "result:".count($hits);
> ?>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Zend_Search_Lucene-gives-the-different-results-with-Luke-Toolbox-when-searching-boolean-phrases-tf3894860s16154.html#a11077673
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
