[fw-general] Sending JSON the best practice?
Hi,
I'm using AJAX in my application and i want to send JSON object, with these
params
{
'html': someHTMLcode
'valid':true/false
}
The html code i'm rendering from view script.
here is my code.
$this-view-callResponseForm = $callResponseForm;
$this-render('result-form'); // render to response object
$this-getResponse()-setBody(
Zend_Json::encode(array('html'=$this-getResponse()-getBody(),'valid'=0))
);
I'm not sure that these the right way how to do it' have got some tips how
do it in better way?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Sending-JSON-the-best-practice--tp19157013p19157013.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Sending JSON the best practice?
R! wrote: The html code i'm rendering from view script. here is my code. I do this in the controller: // // turn off the view helpers // $this-_helper-layout-disableLayout(); $this-_helper-viewRenderer-setNoRender(); echo $json; I don't bother with the view. monk.e.boy -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Sending-JSON-the-best-practice--tp19157013p19157707.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Sending JSON the best practice?
monk.e.boy pisze: R! wrote: The html code i'm rendering from view script. here is my code. I do this in the controller: // // turn off the view helpers // $this-_helper-layout-disableLayout(); $this-_helper-viewRenderer-setNoRender(); echo $json; I don't bother with the view. monk.e.boy Look at the action helper json http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/zend.controller.actionhelpers.html#zend.controller.actionhelpers.json
Re: [fw-general] Sending JSON the best practice?
Yes but i wont as a par of my JSON object send HTML rendered from viewscript
so is there any posibili how render viewscript directly to string?
Or i must call these ?
$this-render('result-form'); // render to response object
$htmlPart=$this-getResponse()-getBody()
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Sending-JSON-the-best-practice--tp19157013p19158564.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[fw-general] Sending form on IIS
IIS returns 405 error, if send form with method=POST and action without filename. Has anybody solve this problem? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Sending-form-on-IIS-tp19158790p19158790.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[fw-general] Model testing
Hello everyone.. I have built some basic models for a module of my application, but I am not sure on how to test them. For example: I have a class Section whose instances can fetch some Article from the database; so I cannot test Section in isolation because I have to add and delete instances of Article. How can I break this dependency? What interfaces should I produce? Also it will be useful for Article to have a method getSection() that returns the owning section by querying the database, but this will make the dependency circular as both class knows each other... -- Giorgio Sironi Piccolo Principe Ossigeno Scripter http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/ossigeno
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Form Label with script
-- Bruno Friedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
(on Tuesday, 26 August 2008, 09:50 AM +0200):
Hi All, I have to ask for this because not found anything in archives nor
Google or Yahoo.
I need to have a label ( for a select element in Zend_Form )
this label must contain a link like this
a href=# onclick=javascript: alert('thing');More/a
$mylink = 'a href=# onclick=javascript: alert('thing');More/a';
$element = new Zend_Form_Element_Select('partnerid');
$element-addMultiOptions($this-partners_array)
-setRequired(true)
-setLabel( 'this is normal text' . $mylink )
-setAttrib('size', 1)
-setAttrib('maxlength', 1)
-setAttrib('onclick', 'javascript: ShowPartnerDetails(); return
false;')
-addFilter($filterTags)
-addFilter($filterTrim)
-addValidator($validatorNotEmpty, true)
-addValidator($validatorNum, true)
-setValue(1)
;
$this-addElement($element);
Of course like this it's render with htmlentities ( did I mention I hate it
:-)
I couldn't be able to find how to make this or which method options I've to
call.
Has someone a way ?
After you've setup the element, grab the label decorator:
$decorator = $element-getDecorator('Label');
and then tell it not to escape:
$decorator-setOption('escape', false);
Alternately, you can do this at configuration time when setting up the
decorator -- add an additional 'escape' option to pass to it.
And that's all there is to it.
--
Matthew Weier O'Phinney
Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
[fw-general] Speed and performance between ZF releases
Hi! I wanted to ask - are there any tests done to compare ZF releases to see which ones are faster and uses less resources? I'm asking this, because when there are discussions about frameworks - almost everyone says that ZF is one of slowest frameworks out there (if compared to Symfony, Cake etc.). It would be good to know if ZF is making progress, or failing because of all new functions added to it. Thanks! Endijs Lisovskis -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Speed-and-performance-between-ZF-releases-tp19164298p19164298.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[fw-general] [OFF-TOPIC] Regarding job opportunity in Mountain View, CA.
Hey guys, I dont know where to post the job opening for Zend Framework. Is this the right Forum to post job opening ? I have a great opening in a great startup at Mountain View, CA. Please feel free to send me an email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for more information. Thanks, Vishal. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-OFF-TOPIC--Regarding-job-opportunity-in-Mountain-View%2C-CA.-tp19164650p19164650.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
RE: [fw-general] Speed and performance between ZF releases
Where have you heard that ZF is one of the slowest frameworks out there? While I haven't heard many claims that ZF is the most performant- that distinction is usually reserved for Code Igniter or one of the other lightweight, performance-focused frameworks- I haven't heard any claims that it is the least performant. The most transparent and sound benchmarks that I've seen are available here: http://www.avnetlabs.com/php/php-framework-comparison-benchmarks. That puts ZF at roughly 50% of the throughput of Code Igniter. That may sound like a lot at first, but as I mention in a comment there, baseline PHP can handle *15 times* the load than Code Igniter and CakePHP falls far short of both (at least in these particular tests). This article demonstrates well that accurate performance characterizations among different frameworks are *extremely* difficult to come up with in the first place, and that any framework faces tradeoffs between performance and functionality. In the end, I'm pretty comfortable with the characterization that ZF is 'twice as slow' as a framework that has been optimized from the get go for performance like Code Igniter. Those who understand the tests at hand and have real performance requirements will understand that this may easily be eclipsed by functionality requirements for any given project. That said, we are planning to focus all of the Zend team's contributions for 1.7 around performance analysis and enhancements. We don't have a test environment with which we can thoroughly benchmark all the frameworks yet, but we will have one set up soon. Once we can start getting good numbers, we will focus on the performance of the MVC components, along with other components- like Zend_Search_Lucene- which are very sensitive to algorithmic complexity and optimizations. We've already profiled the framework with a simple application and identified some optimizations. If you are interested in the performance of ZF, then keep your eyes peeled for optimization commits in the next few weeks. ,Wil -Original Message- From: Endijs Lisovskis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 8:30 AM To: fw-general@lists.zend.com Subject: [fw-general] Speed and performance between ZF releases Hi! I wanted to ask - are there any tests done to compare ZF releases to see which ones are faster and uses less resources? I'm asking this, because when there are discussions about frameworks - almost everyone says that ZF is one of slowest frameworks out there (if compared to Symfony, Cake etc.). It would be good to know if ZF is making progress, or failing because of all new functions added to it. Thanks! Endijs Lisovskis -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Speed-and- performance-between-ZF-releases-tp19164298p19164298.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
RE: [fw-general] [OFF-TOPIC] Regarding job opportunity in Mountain View, CA.
This is probably not the best forum for job postings, since many people on the list will not be interested. I have an RSS feed set up on SimplyHired that shows all ZF job postings from many sources. I see a lot of Zend Framework posts on Dice, Craigslist, and Hot Jobs. Zend already offers services such as developer support and training to help improve and augment existing developers ZF expertise, and *very* soon we will be a ZF certification that will help employers identify ZF experts. You might want to keep an eye out for this announcement; certified ZF engineers may be on the market in time to help you out with this req. :) ,Wil -Original Message- From: anaxient [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 8:46 AM To: fw-general@lists.zend.com Subject: [fw-general] [OFF-TOPIC] Regarding job opportunity in Mountain View, CA. Hey guys, I dont know where to post the job opening for Zend Framework. Is this the right Forum to post job opening ? I have a great opening in a great startup at Mountain View, CA. Please feel free to send me an email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for more information. Thanks, Vishal. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-OFF-TOPIC-- Regarding-job-opportunity-in-Mountain-View%2C-CA.- tp19164650p19164650.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[fw-general] NetVibes using ZF for server backend
Hi All, I didn't know this before so I thought I would share it, but the folks over at netvibes.com are using ZF for the backend. They have just released some server side code on their OS site (netvibes.org). I downloaded these and was pleasantly surprised to see it built upon ZF :-) Cool eh? - Robert This email has been scanned for all known viruses by the MessageLabs Email Security Service and the Macro 4 plc internal virus protection system.
RE: [fw-general] NetVibes using ZF for server backend
Nice! While we're at it, I just heard of 2 more projects based on ZF: @mail 6.0 will be built on ZF: http://blog.atmail.com/?p=108 TweetRush: http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/08/25/tweetrush-shows-twitter-usage-far-b elow-what-we-expected/ and http://aj.mc-kee.com/2008/08/25/tweetrushcom-is-live-thank-you-to/ BTW, we're *always* interested in hearing about projects built on ZF- no matter how big or small. Knowing what people are doing with ZF gives us a big data point in deciding how to best serve our users. ,Wil From: Robert Castley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 9:22 AM To: fw-general@lists.zend.com Subject: [fw-general] NetVibes using ZF for server backend Hi All, I didn't know this before so I thought I would share it, but the folks over at netvibes.com are using ZF for the backend. They have just released some server side code on their OS site (netvibes.org). I downloaded these and was pleasantly surprised to see it built upon ZF :-) Cool eh? - Robert This email has been scanned for all known viruses by the MessageLabs Email Security Service and the Macro 4 plc internal virus protection system.
RE: [fw-general] Speed and performance between ZF releases
At first let me say THANKS for your reply! I was not expecting such a long comment. I will definitely look at ZF 1.7 features and optimizations. I can't give you any links to articles where someone is pointing out that ZF is slow, except one you already gave. But each time when I talk about frameworks and ZF in particular I receive negative reactions and all of theme are because of doubts about ZF performance. Those comments I receive in my blog where I talk about ZF and even maybe promote it and in local PHP forum too. OK - those who comment cant provide exact numbers in which I could see difference between ZF and other frameworks. But all they need to say - ZF is complicated, big and with a lot of components etc. etc. And each version is becoming bigger and bigger. I would like to argue, that growth in features is not affecting speed - but I can't because there are no any tests out there. I hope you see the problem. In short They say it is slow, but there is no way we can prove they are wrong. And sorry for my grammar and structure of sentences. English is not my mothers tongue, so it is not very easy for me to write in correct English. wllm wrote: Where have you heard that ZF is one of the slowest frameworks out there? While I haven't heard many claims that ZF is the most performant- that distinction is usually reserved for Code Igniter or one of the other lightweight, performance-focused frameworks- I haven't heard any claims that it is the least performant. The most transparent and sound benchmarks that I've seen are available here: http://www.avnetlabs.com/php/php-framework-comparison-benchmarks. That puts ZF at roughly 50% of the throughput of Code Igniter. That may sound like a lot at first, but as I mention in a comment there, baseline PHP can handle *15 times* the load than Code Igniter and CakePHP falls far short of both (at least in these particular tests). This article demonstrates well that accurate performance characterizations among different frameworks are *extremely* difficult to come up with in the first place, and that any framework faces tradeoffs between performance and functionality. In the end, I'm pretty comfortable with the characterization that ZF is 'twice as slow' as a framework that has been optimized from the get go for performance like Code Igniter. Those who understand the tests at hand and have real performance requirements will understand that this may easily be eclipsed by functionality requirements for any given project. That said, we are planning to focus all of the Zend team's contributions for 1.7 around performance analysis and enhancements. We don't have a test environment with which we can thoroughly benchmark all the frameworks yet, but we will have one set up soon. Once we can start getting good numbers, we will focus on the performance of the MVC components, along with other components- like Zend_Search_Lucene- which are very sensitive to algorithmic complexity and optimizations. We've already profiled the framework with a simple application and identified some optimizations. If you are interested in the performance of ZF, then keep your eyes peeled for optimization commits in the next few weeks. ,Wil -Original Message- From: Endijs Lisovskis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 8:30 AM To: fw-general@lists.zend.com Subject: [fw-general] Speed and performance between ZF releases Hi! I wanted to ask - are there any tests done to compare ZF releases to see which ones are faster and uses less resources? I'm asking this, because when there are discussions about frameworks - almost everyone says that ZF is one of slowest frameworks out there (if compared to Symfony, Cake etc.). It would be good to know if ZF is making progress, or failing because of all new functions added to it. Thanks! Endijs Lisovskis -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Speed-and- performance-between-ZF-releases-tp19164298p19164298.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Speed-and-performance-between-ZF-releases-tp19164298p19166135.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[fw-general] How to add select=selected in Zend_Form_Element_Multiselect
I was searching all over but failed to find a way to add selected=selected
into multiselect.
My code is like this:
[code]
$listOptions=(array(
'first'= 'first choice',
'second' = 'second choice',
'third' = 'third choice'
);
$lists = new Zend_Form_SubForm();
$lists-addElements(array(
new Zend_Form_Element_Multiselect('nameOfMultiselect',array(
'label' = 'Select all you can apply',
'required' =true,
'filters' =array('StringTrim'),
'multiOptions' = $listOptions,
'validators'= array(
array('InArray', false, array(array_keys($listOptions)))
)
))
));
[/code]
I would like to have selected second choice when multiselect display.
How this can be done?
Thanks,
Vladimir
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-add-select%3Dselected-in-Zend_Form_Element_Multiselect-tp19166233p19166233.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[fw-general] Zend Dojo and Back button in browser
Hello all, i was wondering if any of you have some nice solution for this problem. After displaying data on the page(using zend dojo) when i click on browser Back button, i would like to keep those data on my page but i am navigated out of page and my data are lost. Dojo have some solution using # anchor and something like that, but i dont like it ;) Is there any way to keep data pulled by dojo script and without using iframe and anchor in url? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Zend-Dojo-and-Back-button-in-browser-tp19166492p19166492.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Speed and performance between ZF releases
-- Endijs Lisovskis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (on Tuesday, 26 August 2008, 10:27 AM -0700): At first let me say THANKS for your reply! I was not expecting such a long comment. I will definitely look at ZF 1.7 features and optimizations. I can't give you any links to articles where someone is pointing out that ZF is slow, except one you already gave. But each time when I talk about frameworks and ZF in particular I receive negative reactions and all of theme are because of doubts about ZF performance. Those comments I receive in my blog where I talk about ZF and even maybe promote it and in local PHP forum too. OK - those who comment cant provide exact numbers in which I could see difference between ZF and other frameworks. But all they need to say - ZF is complicated, big and with a lot of components etc. etc. And each version is becoming bigger and bigger. I would like to argue, that growth in features is not affecting speed But that's precisely true. Growth in breadth does not equal decrease in performance. On a typical request, you're using a very small subset of the available functionality -- and anything you're not using is _not_ loaded. The argument is basically a straw man. - but I can't because there are no any tests out there. I hope you see the problem. In short They say it is slow, but there is no way we can prove they are wrong. Another way to put is is, they say it is slow, but have no numbers to back it up. Just depends what side of the argument you're on. Our plan is to publish our methodology so others can reproduce our results. That said, we'll _always_ be slower than projects like CodeIgniter -- that project, in particular, is built with a very light footprint. The downside is that you have less available at your disposal to speed up development. The primary trade-off with any framework is almost always developer time over processor time. And sorry for my grammar and structure of sentences. English is not my mothers tongue, so it is not very easy for me to write in correct English. wllm wrote: Where have you heard that ZF is one of the slowest frameworks out there? While I haven't heard many claims that ZF is the most performant- that distinction is usually reserved for Code Igniter or one of the other lightweight, performance-focused frameworks- I haven't heard any claims that it is the least performant. The most transparent and sound benchmarks that I've seen are available here: http://www.avnetlabs.com/php/php-framework-comparison-benchmarks. That puts ZF at roughly 50% of the throughput of Code Igniter. That may sound like a lot at first, but as I mention in a comment there, baseline PHP can handle *15 times* the load than Code Igniter and CakePHP falls far short of both (at least in these particular tests). This article demonstrates well that accurate performance characterizations among different frameworks are *extremely* difficult to come up with in the first place, and that any framework faces tradeoffs between performance and functionality. In the end, I'm pretty comfortable with the characterization that ZF is 'twice as slow' as a framework that has been optimized from the get go for performance like Code Igniter. Those who understand the tests at hand and have real performance requirements will understand that this may easily be eclipsed by functionality requirements for any given project. That said, we are planning to focus all of the Zend team's contributions for 1.7 around performance analysis and enhancements. We don't have a test environment with which we can thoroughly benchmark all the frameworks yet, but we will have one set up soon. Once we can start getting good numbers, we will focus on the performance of the MVC components, along with other components- like Zend_Search_Lucene- which are very sensitive to algorithmic complexity and optimizations. We've already profiled the framework with a simple application and identified some optimizations. If you are interested in the performance of ZF, then keep your eyes peeled for optimization commits in the next few weeks. ,Wil -Original Message- From: Endijs Lisovskis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 8:30 AM To: fw-general@lists.zend.com Subject: [fw-general] Speed and performance between ZF releases Hi! I wanted to ask - are there any tests done to compare ZF releases to see which ones are faster and uses less resources? I'm asking this, because when there are discussions about frameworks - almost everyone says that ZF is one of slowest frameworks out there (if compared to Symfony, Cake etc.). It would be good to know if ZF is making progress, or failing because of all new functions added to it. Thanks! Endijs Lisovskis -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Speed-and-
Re: [fw-general] How to add select=selected in Zend_Form_Element_Multiselect
-- vladimirn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
(on Tuesday, 26 August 2008, 10:29 AM -0700):
I was searching all over but failed to find a way to add selected=selected
into multiselect.
My code is like this:
[code]
$listOptions=(array(
'first'= 'first choice',
'second' = 'second choice',
'third' = 'third choice'
);
$lists = new Zend_Form_SubForm();
$lists-addElements(array(
new Zend_Form_Element_Multiselect('nameOfMultiselect',array(
'label' = 'Select all you can apply',
Add a value. Multiselect expects an array of keys that should be
selected:
'value' = array('second'),
'required'=true,
'filters' =array('StringTrim'),
'multiOptions'= $listOptions,
'validators' = array(
array('InArray', false, array(array_keys($listOptions)))
)
))
));
[/code]
I would like to have selected second choice when multiselect display.
How this can be done?
--
Matthew Weier O'Phinney
Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
Re: [fw-general] Zend Dojo and Back button in browser
-- vladimirn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (on Tuesday, 26 August 2008, 10:35 AM -0700): Hello all, i was wondering if any of you have some nice solution for this problem. After displaying data on the page(using zend dojo) when i click on browser Back button, i would like to keep those data on my page but i am navigated out of page and my data are lost. Dojo have some solution using # anchor and something like that, but i dont like it ;) Well, I have to question not using technology just because you don't like it. ;) What don't you like about it? This is becoming a standard mechanism for allowing for back button functionality -- gmail uses it, facebook uses it... it basically leverages the browser's inherent functionality. Is there any way to keep data pulled by dojo script and without using iframe and anchor in url? -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
Re: [fw-general] Zend Dojo and Back button in browser
Matthew Weier O'Phinney-3 wrote: -- vladimirn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (on Tuesday, 26 August 2008, 10:35 AM -0700): Hello all, i was wondering if any of you have some nice solution for this problem. After displaying data on the page(using zend dojo) when i click on browser Back button, i would like to keep those data on my page but i am navigated out of page and my data are lost. Dojo have some solution using # anchor and something like that, but i dont like it ;) Well, I have to question not using technology just because you don't like it. ;) What don't you like about it? This is becoming a standard mechanism for allowing for back button functionality -- gmail uses it, facebook uses it... it basically leverages the browser's inherent functionality. Is there any way to keep data pulled by dojo script and without using iframe and anchor in url? -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/ Hey Matthew :) Thanks for swift replay :) Well, you are absoultely in right about it, it is only my overall feeling when looking in URL :) looks ugly to me lol So thats why i asked if there some 'nicer' method to do this :) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Zend-Dojo-and-Back-button-in-browser-tp19166492p19167256.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Speed and performance between ZF releases
I'm just wondering... all those new components that are added to ZF - are they completely independent - or you need to alter some core components in order for new ones to work? I suppose there are new components that require core changes and ones that don't require. But maybe i'm wrong. I'm not ZF developer - so I don't really know how all this is built one core level. Question is - if there are new components that require core changes - maybe there is possibility that those changes affects speed even if new components are not used. If core changes are never needed, then it's 100% clear, that new features can't affect speed if they are not used. I cant imagine how you will be able to provide methodology for different framework tests, but if you will achieve this, then that would be amazing. I think that very important and interesting thing would be to see how each components are becoming faster and for how much. I know - example is not most accurate, but each jQuery release comes with not only new features lists, but with tests results, which represents how much new jQuery is faster than previous one. That would be great to see in ZF changelogs. Best wishes, Endijs Lisovskis Matthew Weier O'Phinney-3 wrote: -- Endijs Lisovskis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (on Tuesday, 26 August 2008, 10:27 AM -0700): At first let me say THANKS for your reply! I was not expecting such a long comment. I will definitely look at ZF 1.7 features and optimizations. I can't give you any links to articles where someone is pointing out that ZF is slow, except one you already gave. But each time when I talk about frameworks and ZF in particular I receive negative reactions and all of theme are because of doubts about ZF performance. Those comments I receive in my blog where I talk about ZF and even maybe promote it and in local PHP forum too. OK - those who comment cant provide exact numbers in which I could see difference between ZF and other frameworks. But all they need to say - ZF is complicated, big and with a lot of components etc. etc. And each version is becoming bigger and bigger. I would like to argue, that growth in features is not affecting speed But that's precisely true. Growth in breadth does not equal decrease in performance. On a typical request, you're using a very small subset of the available functionality -- and anything you're not using is _not_ loaded. The argument is basically a straw man. - but I can't because there are no any tests out there. I hope you see the problem. In short They say it is slow, but there is no way we can prove they are wrong. Another way to put is is, they say it is slow, but have no numbers to back it up. Just depends what side of the argument you're on. Our plan is to publish our methodology so others can reproduce our results. That said, we'll _always_ be slower than projects like CodeIgniter -- that project, in particular, is built with a very light footprint. The downside is that you have less available at your disposal to speed up development. The primary trade-off with any framework is almost always developer time over processor time. And sorry for my grammar and structure of sentences. English is not my mothers tongue, so it is not very easy for me to write in correct English. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Speed-and-performance-between-ZF-releases-tp19164298p19167401.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] How to add select=selected in Zend_Form_Element_Multiselect
Matthew Weier O'Phinney-3 wrote:
-- vladimirn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
(on Tuesday, 26 August 2008, 10:29 AM -0700):
I was searching all over but failed to find a way to add
selected=selected
into multiselect.
My code is like this:
[code]
$listOptions=(array(
'first'= 'first choice',
'second' = 'second choice',
'third' = 'third choice'
);
$lists = new Zend_Form_SubForm();
$lists-addElements(array(
new Zend_Form_Element_Multiselect('nameOfMultiselect',array(
'label' = 'Select all you can apply',
Add a value. Multiselect expects an array of keys that should be
selected:
'value' = array('second'),
'required' =true,
'filters'=array('StringTrim'),
'multiOptions' = $listOptions,
'validators' = array(
array('InArray', false,
array(array_keys($listOptions)))
)
))
));
[/code]
I would like to have selected second choice when multiselect display.
How this can be done?
--
Matthew Weier O'Phinney
Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
Dang!
as simply as that :)
Thank you Matthew.
Well, is there a room to ask another question? or should i open a new topic?
I need to add hidden text area bellow multiselect, and if you select third
choice, this hidden box should appear visible.
How to set up something like this?
Thanks a lot,
Vladd
p.s. [off topic] about zend dojo webinar- can u post a link to my mail or
here pls?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-add-select%3Dselected-in-Zend_Form_Element_Multiselect-tp19166233p19167409.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Hey, what happened to Zend_Http_Server?
All good points. Thanks for the responses, guys. -Matt On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Matthew Weier O'Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: -- Matthew Ratzloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (on Monday, 25 August 2008, 03:54 PM -0700): It's still in incubator after a couple of years. What happened? No unit tests, it looks like. This could be a useful tool for quickly getting set up for Zend Framework development--it'd be nice to see it finished. http://framework.zend.com/svn/framework/standard/incubator/tools/ http_server/ Several factors: * As Christoph noted, it relies on pcntl for much of its work. We're trying hard to stay OS agnostic, and since pcntl does not work on Windows, it makes it hard to justify supporting it. * Interest. Shahar did some initial work, but he has been too busy to continue with it. Nobody else has stepped up to help with development. * Scope. How much of the HTTP specification should it support? Should it support SSL over HTTP? Should it implement HTTP Auth? Should it allow returning binary files? -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
Re: [fw-general] Speed and performance between ZF releases
-- Endijs Lisovskis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (on Tuesday, 26 August 2008, 11:14 AM -0700): I'm just wondering... all those new components that are added to ZF - are they completely independent - or you need to alter some core components in order for new ones to work? I suppose there are new components that require core changes and ones that don't require. But maybe i'm wrong. I'm not ZF developer - so I don't really know how all this is built one core level. Question is - if there are new components that require core changes - maybe there is possibility that those changes affects speed even if new components are not used. If core changes are never needed, then it's 100% clear, that new features can't affect speed if they are not used. As a general rule, we don't allow new components that necessitate changing existing components to depend on them, unless there's a _very_ good reason (for instance, if you need to add plugin capabilities, or are refactoring an existing component to spin off functionality to a new component). We _did_ have a performance regression initially with 1.6.0RC1 due to changes in the router to allow hostname-based routing. However, those working on the component came up with a better solution for RC2 that not only eliminated the problems, but also provided a path for speeding up routing for later releases. To this date, we haven't focussed much on performance, but primarily on functionality. As the adage goes, premature optimization is the root of all evil; it makes more sense to get a solid and tested code base first, and then focus on optimizing later. I cant imagine how you will be able to provide methodology for different framework tests, but if you will achieve this, then that would be amazing. I think that very important and interesting thing would be to see how each components are becoming faster and for how much. I know - example is not most accurate, but each jQuery release comes with not only new features lists, but with tests results, which represents how much new jQuery is faster than previous one. That would be great to see in ZF changelogs. As mentioned previously, the focus for 1.7, internally, is performance. After we get a reasonable benchmarking suite worked up, we can publish this for others to use -- and can also start testing each ZF release to see what improvements/detriments were made. Matthew Weier O'Phinney-3 wrote: -- Endijs Lisovskis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (on Tuesday, 26 August 2008, 10:27 AM -0700): At first let me say THANKS for your reply! I was not expecting such a long comment. I will definitely look at ZF 1.7 features and optimizations. I can't give you any links to articles where someone is pointing out that ZF is slow, except one you already gave. But each time when I talk about frameworks and ZF in particular I receive negative reactions and all of theme are because of doubts about ZF performance. Those comments I receive in my blog where I talk about ZF and even maybe promote it and in local PHP forum too. OK - those who comment cant provide exact numbers in which I could see difference between ZF and other frameworks. But all they need to say - ZF is complicated, big and with a lot of components etc. etc. And each version is becoming bigger and bigger. I would like to argue, that growth in features is not affecting speed But that's precisely true. Growth in breadth does not equal decrease in performance. On a typical request, you're using a very small subset of the available functionality -- and anything you're not using is _not_ loaded. The argument is basically a straw man. - but I can't because there are no any tests out there. I hope you see the problem. In short They say it is slow, but there is no way we can prove they are wrong. Another way to put is is, they say it is slow, but have no numbers to back it up. Just depends what side of the argument you're on. Our plan is to publish our methodology so others can reproduce our results. That said, we'll _always_ be slower than projects like CodeIgniter -- that project, in particular, is built with a very light footprint. The downside is that you have less available at your disposal to speed up development. The primary trade-off with any framework is almost always developer time over processor time. And sorry for my grammar and structure of sentences. English is not my mothers tongue, so it is not very easy for me to write in correct English. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Speed-and-performance-between-ZF-releases-tp19164298p19167401.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
Re: [fw-general] Hey, what happened to Zend_Http_Server?
* As Christoph noted, it relies on pcntl for much of its work. We're trying hard to stay OS agnostic, and since pcntl does not work on Windows, it makes it hard to justify supporting it. But there is no reason why it could not be further developed in the Extras library? * Interest. Shahar did some initial work, but he has been too busy to continue with it. Nobody else has stepped up to help with development. I am interested. Maybe not right now, but in a few months I should have more time. * Scope. How much of the HTTP specification should it support? Should it support SSL over HTTP? Should it implement HTTP Auth? Should it allow returning binary files? I think that depends on the motivation for writing the server. My goal would be to use it as a lightweight server to test all ZF components and be able to run sample applications as well as a REST server. It can then grow from there based on requested features. Christoph
Re: [fw-general] How to add select=selected in Zend_Form_Element_Multiselect
-- vladimirn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (on Tuesday, 26 August 2008, 11:15 AM -0700): Well, is there a room to ask another question? or should i open a new topic? I need to add hidden text area bellow multiselect, and if you select third choice, this hidden box should appear visible. How to set up something like this? Use javascript to do this. When the page renders, do two things: * hide the element (set the visibility attribute to 'collapse') * connect an event handler to the multiselect option that looks for the number of selected options and re-displays the hidden element. For techniques on this, visit your favorite JS toolkit mailing list or IRC channel. p.s. [off topic] about zend dojo webinar- can u post a link to my mail or here pls? Sure: http://www.zend.com/en/company/news/event/webinar-zend-framework-and-dojo-integration -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
Re: [fw-general] How to add select=selected in Zend_Form_Element_Multiselect
Thanks for the link and for guide lines.
I thought that something like that should be solution, but i need to
rephrase my question-
how to add on click in my array? is there somethin like:
new Zend_Form_Element_Multiselect('nameOfMultiselect',array(
'label' = 'Select all you can apply',
'required' =true,
'filters' =array('StringTrim'),
'multiOptions' = $listOptions,
'value' = array('eml'),
'onClick' = 'DoSomething'// ---
and more, how to add this on specific array key/value which i am building in
$listOptions = array(
'first'='first choice',
'second' ='second choice',
'third' = 'third choice',
'clickOne' = 'I want this one to opena hidden text area :)'
);
:))
Matthew Weier O'Phinney-3 wrote:
-- vladimirn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
(on Tuesday, 26 August 2008, 11:15 AM -0700):
Well, is there a room to ask another question? or should i open a new
topic?
I need to add hidden text area bellow multiselect, and if you select
third
choice, this hidden box should appear visible.
How to set up something like this?
Use javascript to do this. When the page renders, do two things:
* hide the element (set the visibility attribute to 'collapse')
* connect an event handler to the multiselect option that looks for
the number of selected options and re-displays the hidden element.
For techniques on this, visit your favorite JS toolkit mailing list or
IRC channel.
p.s. [off topic] about zend dojo webinar- can u post a link to my mail or
here pls?
Sure:
http://www.zend.com/en/company/news/event/webinar-zend-framework-and-dojo-integration
--
Matthew Weier O'Phinney
Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-add-select%3Dselected-in-Zend_Form_Element_Multiselect-and-one-more-question-%3A%29-tp19166233p19168608.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Hey, what happened to Zend_Http_Server?
-- Christoph Dorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (on Tuesday, 26 August 2008, 12:02 PM -0700): * As Christoph noted, it relies on pcntl for much of its work. We're trying hard to stay OS agnostic, and since pcntl does not work on Windows, it makes it hard to justify supporting it. But there is no reason why it could not be further developed in the Extras library? Nope, no reason whatsoever. If you decide you'd like to do so, though, I'd like to see a solid proposal outlining the goals -- that will also serve to set expectations for the component for those who decide to start testing/using it. * Interest. Shahar did some initial work, but he has been too busy to continue with it. Nobody else has stepped up to help with development. I am interested. Maybe not right now, but in a few months I should have more time. * Scope. How much of the HTTP specification should it support? Should it support SSL over HTTP? Should it implement HTTP Auth? Should it allow returning binary files? I think that depends on the motivation for writing the server. My goal would be to use it as a lightweight server to test all ZF components and be able to run sample applications as well as a REST server. It can then grow from there based on requested features. -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
Re: [fw-general] How to add select=selected in Zend_Form_Element_Multiselect
-- vladimirn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
(on Tuesday, 26 August 2008, 12:23 PM -0700):
Thanks for the link and for guide lines.
I thought that something like that should be solution, but i need to
rephrase my question-
how to add on click in my array? is there somethin like:
new Zend_Form_Element_Multiselect('nameOfMultiselect',array(
'label' = 'Select all you can apply',
'required'=true,
'filters' =array('StringTrim'),
'multiOptions'= $listOptions,
'value' = array('eml'),
'onClick' = 'DoSomething'// ---
Yep -- any configuration key that does not correspond to an accessor is
then set as an object property, and passed as an attribute to the view
helper.
and more, how to add this on specific array key/value which i am building in
$listOptions = array(
'first'='first choice',
'second' ='second choice',
'third' = 'third choice',
'clickOne' = 'I want this one to opena hidden text area :)'
);
Again, go to your favorite JS toolkit mailing list or IRC channel. :)
Matthew Weier O'Phinney-3 wrote:
-- vladimirn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
(on Tuesday, 26 August 2008, 11:15 AM -0700):
Well, is there a room to ask another question? or should i open a new
topic?
I need to add hidden text area bellow multiselect, and if you select
third
choice, this hidden box should appear visible.
How to set up something like this?
Use javascript to do this. When the page renders, do two things:
* hide the element (set the visibility attribute to 'collapse')
* connect an event handler to the multiselect option that looks for
the number of selected options and re-displays the hidden element.
For techniques on this, visit your favorite JS toolkit mailing list or
IRC channel.
p.s. [off topic] about zend dojo webinar- can u post a link to my mail or
here pls?
Sure:
http://www.zend.com/en/company/news/event/webinar-zend-framework-and-dojo-integration
--
Matthew Weier O'Phinney
Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-add-select%3Dselected-in-Zend_Form_Element_Multiselect-and-one-more-question-%3A%29-tp19166233p19168608.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Matthew Weier O'Phinney
Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
Re: [fw-general] Strict Standards: i dont understand this warning
It means that your method setSubFormDecorators must have same parameters as
Zend_Form::setSubFormDecorators
vladimirn wrote:
Strict Standards: Declaration of
forms_Registration::setSubFormDecorators() should be compatible with that
of Zend_Form::setSubFormDecorators() in
C:\wamp\www\zend-fw\application\forms\registration.php on line 2
/* registration.php */
?php
class forms_Registration extends Zend_Form // this is line 2
{
public function init()
{
// Create user sub form: username and password
$user = new Zend_Form_SubForm();
What this warning actually means? And it is displayed on every page on my
multi page registration form.
Files i am using are registration.php and RegistrationController.php
Thanks,
Vladd
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Strict-Standards%3A-i-dont-understand-this-warning-tp19167866p19169248.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Strict Standards: i dont understand this warning
Thank you for reply :)
I see.
But how to solve this?
i used a code from zend manual and this is a part which i didnt touch (lol)
public function setSubFormDecorators(Zend_Form_SubForm $subForm)
{
$subForm-setDecorators(array(
'FormElements',
array('HtmlTag', array('tag' = 'dl', 'class' = 'zend_form')),
'Form',
));
return $this;
}
So i dont know what to do and how to make it compatible :)
R! wrote:
It means that your method setSubFormDecorators must have same parameters
as Zend_Form::setSubFormDecorators
vladimirn wrote:
Strict Standards: Declaration of
forms_Registration::setSubFormDecorators() should be compatible with that
of Zend_Form::setSubFormDecorators() in
C:\wamp\www\zend-fw\application\forms\registration.php on line 2
/* registration.php */
?php
class forms_Registration extends Zend_Form // this is line 2
{
public function init()
{
// Create user sub form: username and password
$user = new Zend_Form_SubForm();
What this warning actually means? And it is displayed on every page on my
multi page registration form.
Files i am using are registration.php and RegistrationController.php
Thanks,
Vladd
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Strict-Standards%3A-i-dont-understand-this-warning-tp19167866p19169347.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] How to add select=selected in Zend_Form_Element_Multiselect
Huh, i think you dont understand me :))
I dont know how to put onClick event in select tag :) I know how to make
this without zend form, but cant figure it out how to put onClick in
$listOptions array:)
I will use CAPS just to point on some lines :) sorry about that :)
This array build my select tag if i understud well:
$listOptions = array(
'first'='first choice',
'second' ='second choice',
'third' = 'third choice'
)
and then i am building multiselect as:
$lists = new Zend_Form_SubForm();
$lists-addElements(array(
new Zend_Form_Element_Multiselect('nameOfMultiselect',array(
'label' = 'Select all you can apply',
'required' =true,
'filters' =array('StringTrim'),
'multiOptions' = $listOptions,
'value' = array('second'), // this one sometimes works and
sometimes not, i cant figure it out why
'onClick' ='some javascrpt code here',// THIS IS APPLIED
ON SELECT
TAG INSTEAD ON OPTION TAG :))
'validators'= array(
array('InArray', false, array(array_keys($listOptions)))
)
)),
And later this will be displayed as bellow
select name=lists[nameOfMultiselect][] id=lists-nameOfMultiselect
multiple=multiple onClick=some javascript code here// there is unwanted
onClick event lol, i want this onClick inside of option tag
option value=first label=first choicefirst choice/option
option value=second label=second choicesecond
choice/option//THIS ONE SHOULD BE SELECTED, RIGHT? But somehow it is not
:) Well, sometimes it is selected, but not this time :)
option value=third label=third choicethird choice/option// here
i need onClick event :)
Matthew Weier O'Phinney-3 wrote:
-- vladimirn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
(on Tuesday, 26 August 2008, 12:23 PM -0700):
Thanks for the link and for guide lines.
I thought that something like that should be solution, but i need to
rephrase my question-
how to add on click in my array? is there somethin like:
new Zend_Form_Element_Multiselect('nameOfMultiselect',array(
'label' = 'Select all you can apply',
'required' =true,
'filters'=array('StringTrim'),
'multiOptions' = $listOptions,
'value' = array('eml'),
'onClick' = 'DoSomething'// ---
Yep -- any configuration key that does not correspond to an accessor is
then set as an object property, and passed as an attribute to the view
helper.
and more, how to add this on specific array key/value which i am building
in
$listOptions = array(
'first'='first choice',
'second' ='second choice',
'third' = 'third choice',
'clickOne' = 'I want this one to opena hidden text area :)'
);
Again, go to your favorite JS toolkit mailing list or IRC channel. :)
Matthew Weier O'Phinney-3 wrote:
-- vladimirn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
(on Tuesday, 26 August 2008, 11:15 AM -0700):
Well, is there a room to ask another question? or should i open a new
topic?
I need to add hidden text area bellow multiselect, and if you select
third
choice, this hidden box should appear visible.
How to set up something like this?
Use javascript to do this. When the page renders, do two things:
* hide the element (set the visibility attribute to 'collapse')
* connect an event handler to the multiselect option that looks for
the number of selected options and re-displays the hidden element.
For techniques on this, visit your favorite JS toolkit mailing list or
IRC channel.
p.s. [off topic] about zend dojo webinar- can u post a link to my mail
or
here pls?
Sure:
http://www.zend.com/en/company/news/event/webinar-zend-framework-and-dojo-integration
--
Matthew Weier O'Phinney
Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-add-select%3Dselected-in-Zend_Form_Element_Multiselect-and-one-more-question-%3A%29-tp19166233p19168608.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Matthew Weier O'Phinney
Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-add-select%3Dselected-in-Zend_Form_Element_Multiselect-and-one-more-question-%3A%29-tp19166233p19169726.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Using ZF-1.6.0 with Dojo1.1.1 integration
How can we access the webinar? Thank you, Micah Gersten onShore Networks Internal Developer http://www.onshore.com Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: -- Kexiao Liao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (on Monday, 25 August 2008, 12:44 PM -0700): Are there any good examples/demos to show us how to use Ajax functionalities with ZF1.6.0 RC2 with Dojo integration? Thanks for your help. Kevin There are some examples in the manual under the Zend_Dojo section. Additionally, I am doing a webinar next Wednesday that will showcase a variety of features -- and I'll be providing some example code that you can download and play with later.
Re: [fw-general] Using ZF-1.6.0 with Dojo1.1.1 integration
-- Micah Gersten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (on Tuesday, 26 August 2008, 05:17 PM -0500): How can we access the webinar? Use this URL for more information and a link to register: http://www.zend.com/en/company/news/event/webinar-zend-framework-and-dojo-integration Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: -- Kexiao Liao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (on Monday, 25 August 2008, 12:44 PM -0700): Are there any good examples/demos to show us how to use Ajax functionalities with ZF1.6.0 RC2 with Dojo integration? Thanks for your help. Kevin There are some examples in the manual under the Zend_Dojo section. Additionally, I am doing a webinar next Wednesday that will showcase a variety of features -- and I'll be providing some example code that you can download and play with later. -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney Software Architect | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
[fw-general] Zend_Dojo_Form_Element_Button and isChecked()
I'm attempting to process a form conditionally based upon which button was
clicked. This is working using Zend_Form_Element_Button, but not the Dojo
variant. Calls to addElement look like this:
$this-addElement(
'Button',
'save',
array(
'label' = 'Save',
'order' = 100,
)
);
$this-addElement(
'Button',
'saveandexit',
array(
'label' = 'Save Exit',
'order' = 101,
)
);
And the controller code..
if ($form-save-isChecked()) {
$params = array('id' = $post-id);
$this-redirector-gotoSimple('edit', 'post', 'dashboard', $params);
}
Am I missing something?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Zend_Dojo_Form_Element_Button-and-isChecked%28%29-tp19172737p19172737.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Form Label with script
Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
-- Bruno Friedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
(on Tuesday, 26 August 2008, 09:50 AM +0200):
Hi All, I have to ask for this because not found anything in archives nor
Google or Yahoo.
I need to have a label ( for a select element in Zend_Form )
this label must contain a link like this
a href=# onclick=javascript: alert('thing');More/a
$mylink = 'a href=# onclick=javascript: alert('thing');More/a';
$element = new Zend_Form_Element_Select('partnerid');
$element-addMultiOptions($this-partners_array)
-setRequired(true)
-setLabel( 'this is normal text' . $mylink )
-setAttrib('size', 1)
-setAttrib('maxlength', 1)
-setAttrib('onclick', 'javascript: ShowPartnerDetails(); return
false;')
-addFilter($filterTags)
-addFilter($filterTrim)
-addValidator($validatorNotEmpty, true)
-addValidator($validatorNum, true)
-setValue(1)
;
$this-addElement($element);
Of course like this it's render with htmlentities ( did I mention I hate it
:-)
I couldn't be able to find how to make this or which method options I've
to call.
Has someone a way ?
After you've setup the element, grab the label decorator:
$decorator = $element-getDecorator('Label');
and then tell it not to escape:
$decorator-setOption('escape', false);
Alternately, you can do this at configuration time when setting up the
decorator -- add an additional 'escape' option to pass to it.
And that's all there is to it.
I knew that's the anwser would be simple ... :-)
Thanks, in one or two month with lot's forms builded I will understand all
subtle details of Zend_Form
Many thanks for this ...
--
Bruno Friedmann
