Re: [fw-general] 301 Redirect
Toggle the order of the rules. The www redirect should be placed before the
Zend Framework rewrite rule. In fact, it should appear first before any
functional rewrite rule.
bits.abhinav wrote:
But will this work with the Rewrite rules for Zend Framework?
RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f
RewriteRule .* index.php
I tried adding this code below the above code but it takes me to
www.domain.com/index.php which then messes up with the relative URLs in
the code.
Simone Carletti wrote:
There is more than one solution for this problem.
Here's one.
RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^domain\.com [NC]
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.domain.com$1 [R=301,L]
-- Simone
bits.abhinav wrote:
Hi all,
I want to implement a 301 redirect on my portal so that domain.com
redirects to www.domain.com. I don't have much knowledge about the
mod_rewrite module of Apace. I found out the code for this online but it
doesn't work properly. If anyone has done this before or knows how to do
it please help me out.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/301-Redirect-tp21514435p21515265.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Feed::import link down
Or you can even decide to catch a Zend_Exception to be sure to rescue any
Zend-related exception raised by Zend_Feed, including Zend_Http and
Zend_Feed errors.
-- Simone
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Chris Weldon ch...@chrisweldon.net wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 5:06 AM, PHPScriptor cont...@phpscriptor.com
wrote:
Fatal error: Uncaught exception 'Zend_Http_Client_Exception' with
message
Try catching Zend_Http_Client_Exception in addition to
Zend_Feed_Exception like you have below.
try {
$slashdotRss =
Zend_Feed::import('http://www.test.eu/rss.php'http://www.test.eu/rss.php%27
);
foreach ($slashdotRss as $item) {
$channel1[] = array(
'title' = $item-title(),
'link' = $item-link(),
'description' = $item-description());
}
$this-view-nieuwskan = $channel1;
}
catch (Zend_Feed_Exception $e) {
}
try {
// try it
} catch (Zend_Http_Client_Exception $e) {
// handle it
} catch (Zend_Feed_Exception $e) {
// handle it
}
--
Christopher Weldon
http://chrisweldon.net
ch...@chrisweldon.net
--
Simone Carletti
Site Blog: www.simonecarletti.com
Email: wep...@weppos.net
LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/weppos
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Feed from string
Zend_Feed::importString($feed) should be the right solution. Which error did you receive? -- Simone On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Dimitri van Hees [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Hi list, I am sorry for bothering you again with this question, but I can't seem to find a solution to my problem. I use Zend_Http to fetch a feed so that I can handle a timeout in case the providing server is down. For another feed I need to login so I use CURL to fetch that feed. Anyway, my variable $rss is a string containing the contents of the feed, like: $feed= '?xml etc. etc.'; I want to use Zend_Feed together with this string, but I can't find how to 'convert' this string to a Zend_Feed object. I hoped Zend_Feed::importString($feed) would do the trick but it doesn't. Is there any way to achieve this? Thanks in advance, Dimitri
Re: [fw-general] Incubator location?
http://framework.zend.com/svn/framework/standard/incubator/ -- Simone On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Andrew Yager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Can someone please inform me as to the current location of the incubator files? I seem to be unable to find them... Thanks! Andrew -- Andrew Yager, Managing Director (MACS BCompSc MCP) Real World Technology Solutions Pty Ltd ph: 1300 798 718 or (02) 9037 0500 fax: (02) 9037 0591 mob: 0405 152 568 http://www.rwts.com.au/ or http://www.stonebridgecomputing.com.au/
Re: [fw-general] OT: Good Docbook Editor
I usually edit docbook files by hand with TextMate. I created a custom DocBook bundle with a couple of snippets and scripts. However, if you have to write large documentation files, I suggest you to give a look at * http://www.xmlmind.com/xmleditor/ * http://www.oxygenxml.com/ I've tried both and I chose to purchase an Oxygen license. -- Simone On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Keith Pope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey guys, Do you use a docbook editor for writing the zf docs? If so whats a good editor to use? Thx Keith Pope -- allpay.net Limited, Fortis et Fides, Whitestone Business Park, Whitestone, Hereford, HR1 3SE. Registered in England No. 02933191. UK VAT Reg. No. 666 9148 88. Telephone: 0870 243 3434, Fax: 0870 243 6041. Website: www.allpay.net Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email, and any files transmitted with it, is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the allpay.netInformation Security Manager at the number above.
Re: [fw-general] getting notices by using Zend_Service_Yahoo::webSearch
Hi Jan,
could you please open a ticket on JIRA
http://framework.zend.com/issues/secure/Dashboard.jspa to keep track of this
issue?
Thanks for your feedback,
-- Simone
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Jan Pieper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to use Zend_Serive_Yahoo::webSearch() to search for websites but I
get some notices (E_NOTICE) when I search for flabben:
Notice: Trying to get property of non-object in
C:\Server\php\includes\Zend\Service\Yahoo\WebResult.php on line 97
Notice: Trying to get property of non-object in
C:\Server\php\includes\Zend\Service\Yahoo\WebResult.php on line 98
Notice: Trying to get property of non-object in
C:\Server\php\includes\Zend\Service\Yahoo\WebResult.php on line 97
Notice: Trying to get property of non-object in
C:\Server\php\includes\Zend\Service\Yahoo\WebResult.php on line 98
Here my code:
$yahoo = new Zend_Service_Yahoo($appId);
$results = $yahoo-webSearch('flabben');
I am getting valid results and I can use them but I think no api should
cause notices.
Attached xml result (result.xml) to this email so you can try to find out
what is causing these notices.
If there is still something in my xml result that can be used by others to
use my account, please let me know so I can deactivate actual application id
and create a new one.
-- Jan
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Feed: accessing single tags (no closing tags)
Hi ofniedan,
sorry for not answering before, I just noticed your message now due to...
your email activity! :D
Each Zend_Feed_Element (including the feed instance itself) implements
ArrayAccess interface.
It means you can access any attribute via $element-enclosure['attribute'];
Have a look at the following example.
#!/usr/bin/env php
?php
require 'helper.php';
require 'Zend/Feed.php';
$feed = Zend_Feed::import('http://www.phparch.com/c/news/atom');
foreach ($feed as $index = $item) {
echo $index. {$item-title}\n;
echo \tlink: {$item-link['href']}\n;
}
Here's the output
PhpMate r8839 running PHP 5.2.5 (cli) (/usr/bin/env php)
feed-array-access.php
0. MTA release new Guide to PHP 5 Migration
link:
http://c7y.phparch.com/c/entry/1/news,20080610-guide_to_php_5_migration_published
1. MTA publishes php|architect's PHP Job Hunter's Handbook
link:
http://c7y.phparch.com/c/entry/1/news,20080602-php_job_hunters_handbook_published
2. MTA and ibuildings announce partnership
link:
http://c7y.phparch.com/c/entry/1/news,20080527-mta_and_ibuildings_partnership
3. php|tek 2008 95% sold out
link:
http://c7y.phparch.com/c/entry/1/news,20080428-phptek_almost_sold_out
4. Announcing our new Magento book
link: http://c7y.phparch.com/c/entry/1/news,20080428-new_magento_book
5. First Magento class sold out; new dates announced for May
link:
http://c7y.phparch.com/c/entry/1/news,20080414-new_magento_training_dates
...
-- Simone
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:44 PM, James Dempster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
lol very funny.
Thanks for letting us know Wil, was wondering what was going on.
/James Dempster
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Wil Sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all, you are probably seeing multiple copies of this message. It is
not the sender's doing! I'm cleaning out the spam filter for this list,
and he's just tried mailing several times from different addresses since
he wasn't seeing his messages come through.
Sender, if you'd like to get your messages through to lists, I would
recommend against using phrases like me love you long time!. ;)
,Wil
-Original Message-
From: ofniedan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 3:56 AM
To: fw-general@lists.zend.com
Subject: [fw-general] Zend_Feed: accessing single tags (no closing
tags)
Sorry for the strange subject title, I just didnt know how to explain
this in
normal english ^_^
I use zend_feed to parse rss feeds, and some of them have tags that do
not
consist of opening/closing pair tags, but just one tag, with inside
the
info
i need, for example:
enclosure url=http://www.examble.com/image.jpg/
I googled for an hour now, and still i don't know how to use this
tag..
if i iterate through the rss items, and use $item-enclosure, it
returns
(obviously) a NULL.
Anybody who could help me: me love you long time!
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Zend_Feed%3A-
accessing-single-tags-%28no-closing-tags%29-tp17619166p17619166.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] TypePad AntiSpam
It sounds a really nice idea. I'm reading the Six Apart documentation right now at http://antispam.typepad.com/info/developers.html : *TypePad AntiSpam is 100% compatible with the Akismet API. This means that if you've already developed a plugin for Akismet, your plugin will be compatible with TypePad AntiSpam. And if you're looking to develop a new plugin, if you develop to the Akismet API your plugin will work with both Akismet and TypePad AntiSpam. * It seems the new proposal will be quite easy to be implemented. :) Simone On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 1:49 AM, Jordan Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: TypePad just released a beta version of AntiSpam (http://antispam.typepad.com/), which is basically a clone of Akismet. AntiSpam's API is identical to Akismet's, but has much looser usage terms than Akismet's. Would anyone besides myself find it useful to have a ZF component for AntiSpam? If so, I'd be happy to get the proposal process started. It really should only involve modifying Zend_Service_Akismet to be more extensible and creating a new sub class for AntiSpam, but those kind of details should follow later... -- Jordan Ryan Moore
Re: [fw-general] ZF and Ohloh
Hi Wil, I have been using Ohloh since one year and I have to say it's a really amazing project. They also expose a RESTful API. If I'm right there's a ZF component proposal for a Ohloh client somewhere in the wiki page. Simone On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 2:54 AM, Wil Sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I took a look at Ohloh (http://www.ohloh.net/) this weekend for the first time. It's a relatively interesting tool to track open source projects, and I find it particular useful for tracking relationships among them. Zend Framework's Ohloh project can be found here: http://www.ohloh.net/projects/zend_framework. Two reasons I mention this: 1) I would be nice to see all our users and contributors associated with the Zend Framework project on Ohloh. 2) It would be *particularly* nice to see all projects that use Zend Framework associated with the project on Ohloh. ,Wil
Re: [fw-general] Zend Italy Workshop slides: ZF and PHP frameworks
Hey Federico, I supposed you are Italian but I never had the proof. Now I got it! :D Thanks for your feedback, Simone On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 1:28 AM, Federico Cargnelutti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Great stuff, thanks Simone ;) On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Simone Carletti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi list, at http://www.slideshare.net/weppos/quale-framework-php-utilizzare/ I've published the slides I created for the first Zend Italy workshop about Zend Framework (http://www.zend.com/it/company/framework-workshop-italy). The slides are a quick overview web framework with a comparison between Zend Framework, Symfony and CakePHP. Unfortunately the main language was Italian and I don't have an English version right now. Simone -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Zend-Italy-Workshop-slides%3A-ZF-and-PHP-frameworks-tp16807485p16807485.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[fw-general] Zend Italy Workshop slides: ZF and PHP frameworks
Hi list, at http://www.slideshare.net/weppos/quale-framework-php-utilizzare/ I've published the slides I created for the first Zend Italy workshop about Zend Framework (http://www.zend.com/it/company/framework-workshop-italy). The slides are a quick overview web framework with a comparison between Zend Framework, Symfony and CakePHP. Unfortunately the main language was Italian and I don't have an English version right now. Simone -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Zend-Italy-Workshop-slides%3A-ZF-and-PHP-frameworks-tp16807485p16807485.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] LinkedIn Group
This is something I was thinking about some weeks ago! :) I've just sent the request! Simone On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 9:42 PM, Sudheer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Karl Katzke wrote: Here's a direct link, I think... http://www.linkedin.com/pub/0/626/433 I just joined. :) -- With warm regards, Sudheer. S http://binaryvibes.co.in
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Feed: Two Quibbles
Hi Karl, as stated in the coding standard, the right version is saveXml and getDOM. I'm going to open a ticket for this issue. About the second question, you have access to a content:encoded element via *content* statement. $item-content (attribute-style) or $item-content() (method-style) Simone On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 1:24 AM, Karl Katzke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Zend_Feed is a giant leap forward in feed parsing. It's made what I'm working on now -easy-. That being said, I've got two quibbles. Minor one first. Function capitalization: In Zend_Feed_Element, there's getDOM() and saveXml(). Guys, do me a favor and pick ONE capitalization standard and stick with it... Second quibble: I can't find any support, except for going all the way down to the DOMElement, for accessing an element with a name like content:encoded. This is the way my Wordpress blog passes the full content in RSS. ( http://www.karlkatzke.com/feed ) Is there something I'm just not missing because we don't have great tools for introspection into what, exactly, these darned classes contain? (Or, could someone suggest a better way for me to see what-all a Feed_Element actually contains?) Thanks, Karl Katzke
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Feed: Two Quibbles
Hi Karl, you don't need to register any additional namespace. I already implemented all you need to access content:encoded text as ZF-2140 http://framework.zend.com/issues/browse/ZF-2140 describes. The final result is exactly what you would expect, as this test file describes http://framework.zend.com/fisheye/browse/Zend_Framework/trunk/tests/Zend/Feed/Entry/RssTest.php?r=8659 You can call $item-content() to get the content of the content:encoded tag. Simone On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Karl Katzke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Simone. The problem is that $item-content doesn't appear. Upon further reading, it seems that Content is a namespace, and Encoded is the actual attribute. There's a line at the start of my RSS feed that says rss version=2.0 xmlns:content=http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/; Now, I'm new to this RSS feed stuff. Would I just need to use the Zend_Feed::registerNamespace function? Thanks, Karl Katzke On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 4:33 AM, Simone Carletti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Karl, as stated in the coding standard, the right version is saveXml and getDOM. I'm going to open a ticket for this issue. About the second question, you have access to a content:encoded element via *content* statement. $item-content (attribute-style) or $item-content() (method-style) Simone On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 1:24 AM, Karl Katzke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Zend_Feed is a giant leap forward in feed parsing. It's made what I'm working on now -easy-. That being said, I've got two quibbles. Minor one first. Function capitalization: In Zend_Feed_Element, there's getDOM() and saveXml(). Guys, do me a favor and pick ONE capitalization standard and stick with it... Second quibble: I can't find any support, except for going all the way down to the DOMElement, for accessing an element with a name like content:encoded. This is the way my Wordpress blog passes the full content in RSS. ( http://www.karlkatzke.com/feed ) Is there something I'm just not missing because we don't have great tools for introspection into what, exactly, these darned classes contain? (Or, could someone suggest a better way for me to see what-all a Feed_Element actually contains?) Thanks, Karl Katzke
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Loader no longer works as expected in 1.5
Hi Jens, I pointed out the same issue some weeks ago. http://www.nabble.com/Is-is-safe-to-delegate-to-a-PHP-error-instead-of-a-custom-check--to15490466s16154.html#a15490466 I agree with you, we should reintroduce the old behavior. Simone On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 11:16 PM, pakmannen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I recently updated from 1.0 to 1.5 and noticed that Zend_Loader no longer works as expected. When loading a class, it no longer checks to see if the file exists before loading, which means that when autoloading classes, you get php warnings when the file doesn't exist. This makes it impossible to have more than one autoloader registered, or to use a modified autoloader method which attempts more than one call to Zend_Loader::loadClass(). Was the removal of the file exists checks intentional? /Jens Ljungblad -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Zend_Loader-no-longer-works-as-expected-in-1.5-tp16263404p16263404.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[fw-general] Re: CHM Documentation
Hi Thomas, first thanks for your new contribution. I've a question for you. I'm sorry if it appears a newbie question, but in fact it is. I've never built a CHM file before. I read your instructions in the README file but I think they made too much assumptions for a person who want to create a CHM itself. I tried to follow them and first I searched for the additional libraries to install. A query for MsHtmlHelpWorkshop didn't return any result thus I assumed it was a tiny name. I run an additional search for the name of the binary file you indicate in the readme and I discovered the link http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=00535334-c8a6-452f-9aa0-d597d16580ccdisplaylang=enthat appears to be the closest match. Is this the right file? If so, I would suggest to put a direct link in the readme file. Then I installed the library but I noticed the binary file is hhw.exeinstead of hhc.exe. Am I on the right way? -- Simone On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Thomas Weidner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hy Frameworkers, I just integrated CHM generation for all languages within the Zend Framework. Those of you who want to build it themself will have to download the latest trunk and see into the README file in each language for how to do this. Those of you who are not able to generate the manual can download it from my homepage. But not all at once :-) All of you who want to have the CHM documentation also in future and for new releases can vote in this issue http://framework.zend.com/issues/browse/ZF-2454 for integration... maybe we can persuade Wil to do this for us. :-) The german team and I are working on integrating also an index... german speakers can look here http://www.zfforum.de/showthread.php?p=15527#post15527 for details. Greetings Thomas Weidner, I18N Team Leader http://www.thomasweidner.com
Re: [fw-general] Re: CHM Documentation
Hi Thomas, don't worry about r8716. Those changes are not related to this issue, I just discovered (working on this issue) that I forgot to sync the italian xinclude with the latest changes made at r7499. Update: I'm going to revert changes at makefile. I committed them by mistake. About the CHM, I finally created it. Microsoft HTMLHelp Workshop 1.3 worked as well. I used hhw (as I told you I don't have hhc in the version 1.3) and I passed the html as an argument. It opened the GUI pre-filled with all files, then I just pressed compile and it worked. -- Simone On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Thomas Weidner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hy simon, The needed software is Microsoft HTMLHelp Workshop 1.4. And no... hhw is wrong... there is a hhc.exe which is the commandline tool. hhw is the windows tool which can not be accessed by commandline. To make a CHM you should previously be able to generate the HTML source from docbook anyway. This part has not changed. Btw: You should not change the Makefile (SVN-8716)... this is the build file and it must differ from english, otherwise it makes problems if there are parts of the manual not translated. I changed all languages, so you should not change it back again. It really works. Greetings Thomas Weidner, I18N Team Leader http://www.thomasweidner.com - Original Message - From: Simone Carletti [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Thomas Weidner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: fw-general@lists.zend.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2008 9:15 PM Subject: Re: CHM Documentation Hi Thomas, first thanks for your new contribution. I've a question for you. I'm sorry if it appears a newbie question, but in fact it is. I've never built a CHM file before. I read your instructions in the README file but I think they made too much assumptions for a person who want to create a CHM itself. I tried to follow them and first I searched for the additional libraries to install. A query for MsHtmlHelpWorkshop didn't return any result thus I assumed it was a tiny name. I run an additional search for the name of the binary file you indicate in the readme and I discovered the link http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=00535334-c8a6-452f-9aa0-d597d16580ccdisplaylang=enthat appears to be the closest match. Is this the right file? If so, I would suggest to put a direct link in the readme file. Then I installed the library but I noticed the binary file is hhw.exeinstead of hhc.exe. Am I on the right way? -- Simone On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Thomas Weidner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hy Frameworkers, I just integrated CHM generation for all languages within the Zend Framework. Those of you who want to build it themself will have to download the latest trunk and see into the README file in each language for how to do this. Those of you who are not able to generate the manual can download it from my homepage. But not all at once :-) All of you who want to have the CHM documentation also in future and for new releases can vote in this issue http://framework.zend.com/issues/browse/ZF-2454 for integration... maybe we can persuade Wil to do this for us. :-) The german team and I are working on integrating also an index... german speakers can look here http://www.zfforum.de/showthread.php?p=15527#post15527 for details. Greetings Thomas Weidner, I18N Team Leader http://www.thomasweidner.com
Re: [fw-general] Re: CHM Documentation
ooops, I forgot to tell you the reason I changed Makefile was that your changes broken the build process. Here's the error: Macintosh:it weppos$ make Makefile:59: *** missing separator (did you mean TAB instead of 8 spaces?). Stop. I noticed your like uses soft wraps while the other lines a TAB. I'm going to revert my change to your revision and fix your line with a TAB instead of soft wraps. I'll let you know if it fixes the issue. Stay tuned! ;) -- Simone On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 9:47 PM, Simone Carletti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Thomas, don't worry about r8716. Those changes are not related to this issue, I just discovered (working on this issue) that I forgot to sync the italian xinclude with the latest changes made at r7499. Update: I'm going to revert changes at makefile. I committed them by mistake. About the CHM, I finally created it. Microsoft HTMLHelp Workshop 1.3 worked as well. I used hhw (as I told you I don't have hhc in the version 1.3) and I passed the html as an argument. It opened the GUI pre-filled with all files, then I just pressed compile and it worked. -- Simone On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Thomas Weidner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hy simon, The needed software is Microsoft HTMLHelp Workshop 1.4. And no... hhw is wrong... there is a hhc.exe which is the commandline tool. hhw is the windows tool which can not be accessed by commandline. To make a CHM you should previously be able to generate the HTML source from docbook anyway. This part has not changed. Btw: You should not change the Makefile (SVN-8716)... this is the build file and it must differ from english, otherwise it makes problems if there are parts of the manual not translated. I changed all languages, so you should not change it back again. It really works. Greetings Thomas Weidner, I18N Team Leader http://www.thomasweidner.com - Original Message - From: Simone Carletti [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Thomas Weidner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: fw-general@lists.zend.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2008 9:15 PM Subject: Re: CHM Documentation Hi Thomas, first thanks for your new contribution. I've a question for you. I'm sorry if it appears a newbie question, but in fact it is. I've never built a CHM file before. I read your instructions in the README file but I think they made too much assumptions for a person who want to create a CHM itself. I tried to follow them and first I searched for the additional libraries to install. A query for MsHtmlHelpWorkshop didn't return any result thus I assumed it was a tiny name. I run an additional search for the name of the binary file you indicate in the readme and I discovered the link http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=00535334-c8a6-452f-9aa0-d597d16580ccdisplaylang=enthat appears to be the closest match. Is this the right file? If so, I would suggest to put a direct link in the readme file. Then I installed the library but I noticed the binary file is hhw.exeinstead of hhc.exe. Am I on the right way? -- Simone On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Thomas Weidner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hy Frameworkers, I just integrated CHM generation for all languages within the Zend Framework. Those of you who want to build it themself will have to download the latest trunk and see into the README file in each language for how to do this. Those of you who are not able to generate the manual can download it from my homepage. But not all at once :-) All of you who want to have the CHM documentation also in future and for new releases can vote in this issue http://framework.zend.com/issues/browse/ZF-2454 for integration... maybe we can persuade Wil to do this for us. :-) The german team and I are working on integrating also an index... german speakers can look here http://www.zfforum.de/showthread.php?p=15527#post15527 for details. Greetings Thomas Weidner, I18N Team Leader http://www.thomasweidner.com
Re: [fw-general] Re: CHM Documentation
I confirm Thomas. I reverted my changes at r8716 and I get the following error back: Macintosh:ita weppos$ autoconf Macintosh:ita weppos$ ./configure checking for xep... no checking for xinc... no checking for fop... no checking for xsltproc... /opt/local/bin/xsltproc checking for xmllint... /opt/local/bin/xmllint configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile Macintosh:ita weppos$ make Makefile:59: *** missing separator (did you mean TAB instead of 8 spaces?). Stop. Then I opened makefile and changes softwrap at line 59 to a TAB and it worked. Well... it worked at least until line 340 of manual.xml when it failed for an unknown reason. manual.xml:339: element include: XInclude error : could not load ref/requirements.xml, and no fallback was found warning: failed to load external entity ref/coding_standard.xml manual.xml:340: element include: XInclude error : could not load ref/coding_standard.xml, and no fallback was found make: *** [html/index.html] Error 1 I'm going to investigate it, it should depend on an outdated manual.xml.infile. What about the TAB vs soft wraps spaces? Are you going to fix them or should I commit an update? :) -- Simone Macintosh:ita weppos$ make sed -e '[EMAIL PROTECTED]@!http://framework.zend.com/docbook/xml/4.5/docbookx.dtd!' manual.xml.in manual.xml sed -e '[EMAIL PROTECTED]@!http://framework.zend.com/docbook-xsl/htmlhelp/htmlhelp.xsl!' html.xsl.in html.xsl Rendering the whole manual with /opt/local/bin/xsltproc... /opt/local/bin/xmllint --xinclude --output _temp_manual.xml manual.xml Or, at least, it started... unfortunately On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 9:49 PM, Simone Carletti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ooops, I forgot to tell you the reason I changed Makefile was that your changes broken the build process. Here's the error: Macintosh:it weppos$ make Makefile:59: *** missing separator (did you mean TAB instead of 8 spaces?). Stop. I noticed your like uses soft wraps while the other lines a TAB. I'm going to revert my change to your revision and fix your line with a TAB instead of soft wraps. I'll let you know if it fixes the issue. Stay tuned! ;) -- Simone On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 9:47 PM, Simone Carletti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Thomas, don't worry about r8716. Those changes are not related to this issue, I just discovered (working on this issue) that I forgot to sync the italian xinclude with the latest changes made at r7499. Update: I'm going to revert changes at makefile. I committed them by mistake. About the CHM, I finally created it. Microsoft HTMLHelp Workshop 1.3 worked as well. I used hhw (as I told you I don't have hhc in the version 1.3) and I passed the html as an argument. It opened the GUI pre-filled with all files, then I just pressed compile and it worked. -- Simone On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Thomas Weidner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hy simon, The needed software is Microsoft HTMLHelp Workshop 1.4. And no... hhw is wrong... there is a hhc.exe which is the commandline tool. hhw is the windows tool which can not be accessed by commandline. To make a CHM you should previously be able to generate the HTML source from docbook anyway. This part has not changed. Btw: You should not change the Makefile (SVN-8716)... this is the build file and it must differ from english, otherwise it makes problems if there are parts of the manual not translated. I changed all languages, so you should not change it back again. It really works. Greetings Thomas Weidner, I18N Team Leader http://www.thomasweidner.com - Original Message - From: Simone Carletti [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Thomas Weidner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: fw-general@lists.zend.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2008 9:15 PM Subject: Re: CHM Documentation Hi Thomas, first thanks for your new contribution. I've a question for you. I'm sorry if it appears a newbie question, but in fact it is. I've never built a CHM file before. I read your instructions in the README file but I think they made too much assumptions for a person who want to create a CHM itself. I tried to follow them and first I searched for the additional libraries to install. A query for MsHtmlHelpWorkshop didn't return any result thus I assumed it was a tiny name. I run an additional search for the name of the binary file you indicate in the readme and I discovered the link http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=00535334-c8a6-452f-9aa0-d597d16580ccdisplaylang=enthat appears to be the closest match. Is this the right file? If so, I would suggest to put a direct link in the readme file. Then I installed the library but I noticed the binary file is hhw.exeinstead of hhc.exe. Am I on the right way
Re: [fw-general] Re: CHM Documentation
I'm sorry Thomas, but it's a worldwide issue. Have a look at my test with the latest checkout from the German folder. Macintosh:manual weppos$ cd de-test Macintosh:de-test weppos$ svn info Path: . URL: http://framework.zend.com/svn/framework/trunk/documentation/manual/de Repository Root: http://framework.zend.com/svn/framework Repository UUID: 44c647ce-9c0f-0410-b52a-842ac1e357ba Revision: 8712 Node Kind: directory Schedule: normal Last Changed Author: thomas Last Changed Rev: 8708 Last Changed Date: 2008-03-09 10:46:51 +0100 (Sun, 09 Mar 2008) Macintosh:de-test weppos$ autoconf Macintosh:de-test weppos$ ./configure checking for xep... no checking for xinc... no checking for fop... no checking for xsltproc... /opt/local/bin/xsltproc checking for xmllint... /opt/local/bin/xmllint configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile Macintosh:de-test weppos$ make Makefile:59: *** missing separator (did you mean TAB instead of 8 spaces?). Stop. Macintosh:de-test weppos$ The only version that works, actually, is the English one. The reason, as I explained before, is a missing tab (replaced by soft wrap spaces) at Makefile line 59. :) -- Simone On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 10:18 PM, Thomas Weidner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hy Simone, For me the changed version works in all languages as also the english version except the failed translation files themself but this has nothing to do with the makefile. But I am not using Mac. I only tested under cygwin and linux. You can commit the change as long as it depends on your language. Greetings Thomas Weidner, I18N Team Leader http://www.thomasweidner.com - Original Message - From: Simone Carletti [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Thomas Weidner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: fw-general@lists.zend.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2008 10:09 PM Subject: Re: [fw-general] Re: CHM Documentation I confirm Thomas. I reverted my changes at r8716 and I get the following error back: Macintosh:ita weppos$ autoconf Macintosh:ita weppos$ ./configure checking for xep... no checking for xinc... no checking for fop... no checking for xsltproc... /opt/local/bin/xsltproc checking for xmllint... /opt/local/bin/xmllint configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile Macintosh:ita weppos$ make Makefile:59: *** missing separator (did you mean TAB instead of 8 spaces?). Stop. Then I opened makefile and changes softwrap at line 59 to a TAB and it worked. Well... it worked at least until line 340 of manual.xml when it failed for an unknown reason. manual.xml:339: element include: XInclude error : could not load ref/requirements.xml, and no fallback was found warning: failed to load external entity ref/coding_standard.xml manual.xml:340: element include: XInclude error : could not load ref/coding_standard.xml, and no fallback was found make: *** [html/index.html] Error 1 I'm going to investigate it, it should depend on an outdated manual.xml.infile. What about the TAB vs soft wraps spaces? Are you going to fix them or should I commit an update? :) -- Simone Macintosh:ita weppos$ make sed -e '[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]://framework.zend.com/docbook/xml/4.5/docbookx.dtd!' manual.xml.in manual.xml sed -e '[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]://framework.zend.com/docbook-xsl/htmlhelp/htmlhelp.xsl!' html.xsl.in html.xsl Rendering the whole manual with /opt/local/bin/xsltproc... /opt/local/bin/xmllint --xinclude --output _temp_manual.xml manual.xml Or, at least, it started... unfortunately On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 9:49 PM, Simone Carletti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ooops, I forgot to tell you the reason I changed Makefile was that your changes broken the build process. Here's the error: Macintosh:it weppos$ make Makefile:59: *** missing separator (did you mean TAB instead of 8 spaces?). Stop. I noticed your like uses soft wraps while the other lines a TAB. I'm going to revert my change to your revision and fix your line with a TAB instead of soft wraps. I'll let you know if it fixes the issue. Stay tuned! ;) -- Simone On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 9:47 PM, Simone Carletti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Thomas, don't worry about r8716. Those changes are not related to this issue, I just discovered (working on this issue) that I forgot to sync the italian xinclude with the latest changes made at r7499. Update: I'm going to revert changes at makefile. I committed them by mistake. About the CHM, I finally created it. Microsoft HTMLHelp Workshop 1.3 worked as well. I used hhw (as I told you I don't have hhc in the version 1.3) and I passed the html as an argument. It opened the GUI pre-filled with all files, then I just pressed compile and it worked. -- Simone On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Thomas Weidner [EMAIL PROTECTED
Re: [fw-general] Re: CHM Documentation
Excellent! ;) -- Simone On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 10:55 PM, Thomas Weidner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... But I used 8721 and not 8712. :-)
[fw-general] Zend_Service_FeedBurner component almost ready
Hello list, I'm glad to announce I've just completed my proposal for a new service component called Zend_Service_FeedBurner_Awareness. This is something more than a proposal because I have been using such this client since more than one year and I just decided to port it under the Zend_Framework structure (before was a personal standalone library). Due to the previous experience with other ZF web services, this proposal is almost completed in the main functionalities, as you can see at http://www.simonecarletti.com/tmp/Zend_Service_FeedBurner/ It includes the 95% of the final component and more than 50% of unit tests code coverage. Tests are not included in the previous URL. I will import them as soon as the component will be accepted (if it will happen! :P) In the meantime, everybody is encouraged to have a look at the component and play with it. You can find more use cases in the official proposal, here http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFPROP/Zend_Service_FeedBurner_Awareness+-+Simone+Carletti Before the component could be declared completed I will probably need to double check the DateRange class with some Date expert. I guess it could be improved following some other member feedbacks. Thomas already gave some really helpful feedback in some previous post here, in the mailing list. Looking forward your feedbacks and suggestions! I'm sure I'm not the only one publishing a feed powered by FeedBurner. ;) -- Simone
[fw-general] Is is safe to delegate to a PHP error instead of a custom check?
Hi list, I was investigating issue ZF-2488 http://framework.zend.com/issues/browse/ZF-2488 and I discovered the unit test is failing due to API changes in Zend_Loader::loadClass() At the time the unit test was written, Zend_Loader::loadFile() was slightly different. See http://framework.zend.com/fisheye/browse/Zend_Framework/trunk/library/Zend/Loader.php?r=4259 In case $dirs param is null, the function called $found = self::isReadable($filespec) which tried to validate the file within include_path and, raised a custom error in case of failure. Current loadFile implementation http://framework.zend.com/fisheye/browse/Zend_Framework/trunk/library/Zend/Loader.php?r=7726 no longer perform any additional check in case $dirs is null and directly call include or include_once on raw file even if it doesn't exists. This causes a PHP error/warning instead of a custom Zend_Exception error. This is basically the reason why the unit test for Zend_Service_StrikeIron fails. Now, my question is: is it a feature or a mistake? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-is-safe-to-delegate-to-a-PHP-error-instead-of-a-custom-check--tp15490466s16154p15490466.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[fw-general] English grammar check
Hi guys, I need an official English grammar check for an update to the official documentation I'd like to commit. Here the details http://framework.zend.com/issues/browse/ZF-2140#action_18996 Can someone help me? :) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/English-grammar-check-tp15469144s16154p15469144.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Dealing with Zend_Date ranges
Hi Thomas,
Actually there is no proposal for such a functionality and I don't want to
copy code from service classes to core just for fun. :-)
I perfectly agree.
I hope to commit the new web service proposal as soon as it will be
completed thus you and everybody else will be able to give a look at this
Date Range implementation and check whether it could be a standalone
component.
The API exposed by the class can be easily improved for a deep integration
with other core components.
If not it doesn't matter, it will only be part ot the web service component
itself. :)
Thanks,
Simone
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Thomas Weidner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hy Simon,
this class is not intended to be a integrated part of Zend_Date.
Actually there is no proposal for such a functionality and I don't want to
copy code from service classes to core just for fun. :-)
Keep in mind that I would then also have to support this class.
From your description I also have 2 disappointments:
1.) the custom format you are using is completly false
2.) your api example is too complicated for most users
So from what I actualy see it's a custom class of your service, but not
part
of the core for now.
This can of course change in the future, depending on usability and
response
from others.
Greetings
Thomas Weidner, I18N Team Leader
http://www.thomasweidner.com
- Original Message -
From: Simone Carletti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Thomas Weidner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 10:03 AM
Subject: Re: [fw-general] Dealing with Zend_Date ranges
Hi Thomas,
you are right, however the DateRange object goes beyond a simple
comparison
between two dates.
I've almost finished to build the class, I'll be glad if you will give a
look in the future.
Among all features, the class is able to:
* hold a $from and $to date object
* reorder the range to ensure $from is always the most recent timestamp
* return the range in a custom format (for example, feedburner wants the
range to be returned in -MM-DD,-MM-DD format)
* add a time/date fragment starting from $from. For instance, $x =
Range(Zend_Date::now()); $x-add('+5', Zend_Date::MINUTE) is equals to
$x
=
Range(Zend_Date::now(), Zend_Date::now()-add('+5', Zend_Date::MINUTE))
and a few more features.
This class is actually shipped with the new Zend_Service_FeedBurner
proposal
I'm working on, however it can easily extracted into a standalone
Zend_Date_Range() object if we find it useful. :)
-- Simone
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 8:49 AM, Thomas Weidner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It's all possible with the actual API with just a few single lines.
There is no need of additional methods in my opinion.
See for example the isEarlier and isLater methods within the API.
Greetings
Thomas Weidner, I18N Team Leader
http://www.thomasweidner.com
- Original Message -
From: Simone Carletti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: fw-general@lists.zend.com
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 11:38 PM
Subject: [fw-general] Dealing with Zend_Date ranges
Hi list,
I'm working on a FeedBurner php client porting from an old PHP4
project
I
made time ago.
Having a deep look at new FeedBurner API I noticed they use the
concept
of
Date Range.
Is anyone working on a Zend_Date_Range implementation?
I'm creating a basic date range object for the new proposal and it
would
probably be a good starting point for a possibile Zend_Date_Range
object.
I also find a nice PERL date range implementation
http://search.cpan.org/dist/Date-Range/lib/Date/Range.pm
What do you think about the idea of a Zend_Date_Range class?
-- Simone
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Dealing-with-Zend_Date-ranges-tp15402549s16154p15402549.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Weird Zend_Date behavior (may be a bug?)
Both dates were created without any time range thus I suppose 00:00:00 is
used by default.
The timezone was the same, I'm sure. It was the first setting I checked when
the issue occured.
Date calculation is not that easy... it's not just adding x days.
I noticed! ;)
Thanks for your support.
-- Simone
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Thomas Weidner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hy Simon,
Just to satisfy my curiosity, how is it possible the other solution
provided
an earlier date?
Two possible problems...
You think that you've only worked with dates, but internally also the time
is taken in account.
So also the timezone is relevant.
And the yearday is calculated in an other way than the day of month.
Both in sum can be the reason why you got unexpected behaviour.
I can say it just once more...
Date calculation is not that easy... it's not just adding x days.
Greetings
Thomas Weidner, I18N Team Leader
http://www.thomasweidner.com
- Original Message -
From: Simone Carletti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Thomas Weidner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: fw-general@lists.zend.com
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: [fw-general] Weird Zend_Date behavior (may be a bug?)
Hi Thomas,
I must admit I was hoping a feedback from you! ;)
Thanks for taking part of this conversation.
I just changed the format to -MM-dd and it worked as expected (at
least now, I will try again tonight because it might depend on the
timezone).
Just to satisfy my curiosity, how is it possible the other solution
provided
an earlier date?
Thanks,
Simone
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Thomas Weidner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hy Simon,
just a question...
Why are you using the DAY_OF_YEAR within your format if you only want
the
day ?
Change you testdate to March or later and you will see your problem.
If you want DAY you should also use it within your format...
-MM-dd.
Greetings
Thomas Weidner, I18N Team Leader
http://www.thomasweidner.com
- Original Message -
From: Simone Carletti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: fw-general@lists.zend.com
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 2:08 AM
Subject: [fw-general] Weird Zend_Date behavior (may be a bug?)
Have a look at the following code fragment
/**
* Returns a range representation as required by FeedBurner API.
*/
public function getFeedBurnerRange()
{
static $format = '-MM-DD';
$this-order(); // reorder range
$from = $this-getFrom();
$to = $this-getTo();
echo $from;
if ($from === null) {
/**
* @see Zend_Service_FeedBurner_Awareness_Exception
*/
require_once
'Zend/Service/FeedBurner/Awareness/Exception.php';
throw new Zend_Service_FeedBurner_Awareness_Exception(
Missing range start date);
}
if ($to === null) {
$to = $this-setTo($from)-getTo();
}
return $from-get($format) . ',' . $to-get($format);
}
Now look the following test
public function testGetFeedBurnerRange() {
$first = '2008-01-20';
$before = '2008-01-10';
$range = new Zend_Service_FeedBurner_Awareness_DateRange($first,
$before);
echo $range-getFrom();
$this-assertEquals($first,$before,
$range-getFeedBurnerRange());
$range = new Zend_Service_FeedBurner_Awareness_DateRange($first,
$before);
$this-assertEquals($first,$before,
$range-getFeedBurnerRange());
}
It fails with the following reason
1)
testGetFeedBurnerRange(Zend_Service_FeedBurner_Awareness_DateRangeTest)
Failed asserting that two strings are equal.
expected string 2008-01-20,2008-01-10
difference x
got string 2008-01-19,2008-01-09
/Users/weppos/Sites/zend.com.framework/trunk/tests/Zend/Service/FeedBurner/Awareness/DateRangeTest.php:161
BUT... if instead of DD I use Zend_Date::DAY it works! (or at least
return
20 and 10 as expected instead of 19 and 09.
1)
testGetFeedBurnerRange(Zend_Service_FeedBurner_Awareness_DateRangeTest)
Failed asserting that two strings are equal.
expected string 2008-01-20,2008-01-10
differencexxx
got string 20,10
/Users/weppos/Sites/zend.com.framework/trunk/tests/Zend/Service/FeedBurner/Awareness/DateRangeTest.php:161
How is it possibile?
-- Simone
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Weird-Zend_Date-behavior-%28may-be-a-bug-%29-tp15403927s16154p15403927.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Dealing with Zend_Date ranges
Hi Thomas,
you are right, however the DateRange object goes beyond a simple comparison
between two dates.
I've almost finished to build the class, I'll be glad if you will give a
look in the future.
Among all features, the class is able to:
* hold a $from and $to date object
* reorder the range to ensure $from is always the most recent timestamp
* return the range in a custom format (for example, feedburner wants the
range to be returned in -MM-DD,-MM-DD format)
* add a time/date fragment starting from $from. For instance, $x =
Range(Zend_Date::now()); $x-add('+5', Zend_Date::MINUTE) is equals to $x =
Range(Zend_Date::now(), Zend_Date::now()-add('+5', Zend_Date::MINUTE))
and a few more features.
This class is actually shipped with the new Zend_Service_FeedBurner proposal
I'm working on, however it can easily extracted into a standalone
Zend_Date_Range() object if we find it useful. :)
-- Simone
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 8:49 AM, Thomas Weidner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It's all possible with the actual API with just a few single lines.
There is no need of additional methods in my opinion.
See for example the isEarlier and isLater methods within the API.
Greetings
Thomas Weidner, I18N Team Leader
http://www.thomasweidner.com
- Original Message -
From: Simone Carletti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: fw-general@lists.zend.com
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 11:38 PM
Subject: [fw-general] Dealing with Zend_Date ranges
Hi list,
I'm working on a FeedBurner php client porting from an old PHP4 project
I
made time ago.
Having a deep look at new FeedBurner API I noticed they use the concept
of
Date Range.
Is anyone working on a Zend_Date_Range implementation?
I'm creating a basic date range object for the new proposal and it would
probably be a good starting point for a possibile Zend_Date_Range
object.
I also find a nice PERL date range implementation
http://search.cpan.org/dist/Date-Range/lib/Date/Range.pm
What do you think about the idea of a Zend_Date_Range class?
-- Simone
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Dealing-with-Zend_Date-ranges-tp15402549s16154p15402549.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Weird Zend_Date behavior (may be a bug?)
Hi Thomas,
I must admit I was hoping a feedback from you! ;)
Thanks for taking part of this conversation.
I just changed the format to -MM-dd and it worked as expected (at
least now, I will try again tonight because it might depend on the
timezone).
Just to satisfy my curiosity, how is it possible the other solution provided
an earlier date?
Thanks,
Simone
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Thomas Weidner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hy Simon,
just a question...
Why are you using the DAY_OF_YEAR within your format if you only want the
day ?
Change you testdate to March or later and you will see your problem.
If you want DAY you should also use it within your format... -MM-dd.
Greetings
Thomas Weidner, I18N Team Leader
http://www.thomasweidner.com
- Original Message -
From: Simone Carletti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: fw-general@lists.zend.com
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 2:08 AM
Subject: [fw-general] Weird Zend_Date behavior (may be a bug?)
Have a look at the following code fragment
/**
* Returns a range representation as required by FeedBurner API.
*/
public function getFeedBurnerRange()
{
static $format = '-MM-DD';
$this-order(); // reorder range
$from = $this-getFrom();
$to = $this-getTo();
echo $from;
if ($from === null) {
/**
* @see Zend_Service_FeedBurner_Awareness_Exception
*/
require_once 'Zend/Service/FeedBurner/Awareness/Exception.php';
throw new Zend_Service_FeedBurner_Awareness_Exception(
Missing range start date);
}
if ($to === null) {
$to = $this-setTo($from)-getTo();
}
return $from-get($format) . ',' . $to-get($format);
}
Now look the following test
public function testGetFeedBurnerRange() {
$first = '2008-01-20';
$before = '2008-01-10';
$range = new Zend_Service_FeedBurner_Awareness_DateRange($first,
$before);
echo $range-getFrom();
$this-assertEquals($first,$before, $range-getFeedBurnerRange());
$range = new Zend_Service_FeedBurner_Awareness_DateRange($first,
$before);
$this-assertEquals($first,$before, $range-getFeedBurnerRange());
}
It fails with the following reason
1)
testGetFeedBurnerRange(Zend_Service_FeedBurner_Awareness_DateRangeTest)
Failed asserting that two strings are equal.
expected string 2008-01-20,2008-01-10
difference x
got string 2008-01-19,2008-01-09
/Users/weppos/Sites/zend.com.framework/trunk/tests/Zend/Service/FeedBurner/Awareness/DateRangeTest.php:161
BUT... if instead of DD I use Zend_Date::DAY it works! (or at least
return
20 and 10 as expected instead of 19 and 09.
1)
testGetFeedBurnerRange(Zend_Service_FeedBurner_Awareness_DateRangeTest)
Failed asserting that two strings are equal.
expected string 2008-01-20,2008-01-10
differencexxx
got string 20,10
/Users/weppos/Sites/zend.com.framework/trunk/tests/Zend/Service/FeedBurner/Awareness/DateRangeTest.php:161
How is it possibile?
-- Simone
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Weird-Zend_Date-behavior-%28may-be-a-bug-%29-tp15403927s16154p15403927.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[fw-general] Dealing with Zend_Date ranges
Hi list, I'm working on a FeedBurner php client porting from an old PHP4 project I made time ago. Having a deep look at new FeedBurner API I noticed they use the concept of Date Range. Is anyone working on a Zend_Date_Range implementation? I'm creating a basic date range object for the new proposal and it would probably be a good starting point for a possibile Zend_Date_Range object. I also find a nice PERL date range implementation http://search.cpan.org/dist/Date-Range/lib/Date/Range.pm What do you think about the idea of a Zend_Date_Range class? -- Simone -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Dealing-with-Zend_Date-ranges-tp15402549s16154p15402549.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Errors in documentation of Zend_Http_Cookies
Thanks Vladas,
I filled a new ticket http://framework.zend.com/issues/browse/ZF-2575 :)
-- Simone
On Tue, Feb 5, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Vladas Diržys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think there is an error in documentation.
http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/zend.http.cookies.html
Example 17.22. and forward uses:
$cookie = Zend_Http_*Client*('foo=two+words; );
but it should be:
$cookie = Zend_Http_*Cookie*('foo=two+words; );
[fw-general] Multiple (and perhaps not needed) require statements
Hello, I was reading unit tests from some recent components and I noticed most of them include the following statement: require_once dirname(dirname(dirname(__FILE__))) . '/TestHelper.php'; require_once PHPUnit/Framework/TestCase.php; require_once PHPUnit/Framework/TestSuite.php; I was wondering if is there any particular reason for including again TestCase.php and TestSuite.php. They appears to be already required by TestHelper. Additionally, I noticed it's a common practice to include TestHelper only in the AllTest.php file (main suite). This makes impossibile to run a class specific unit test due to an error trying to include Zend/* file not available in include_path. Let me show you a few examples: // the following statement works fine phpunit --verbose Zend_Service_Yahoo_AllTests // the following statements fail // Failed opening required 'Zend/*' ... phpunit --verbose Zend_Service_Yahoo_OfflineTest phpunit --verbose Zend_OpenId_ConsumerTest // the following statement fails for the same reason as above phpunit --verbose Zend_OpenId_AllTests -- Simone -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Multiple-%28and-perhaps-not-needed%29-require-statements-tp15299693s16154p15299693.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Proposal for a user agent component
I absolutely agree. On Fri, Feb 1, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Christer Edvartsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think the user agent component should be a separate component, and have the context switcher configured to be aware of different parameters. If the switcher is set up to be aware of user agents it could then use the user agent component to figure out the user agent. No everyone uses the MVC part of ZF and thats why I would like to have the user agent component as a separate component. Inash Zubair wrote: True. That's what I meant by glueing both proposals at some time but not for 1.5, probably for a future release. The helper should stand primarily for the request Context and it should provide detecting and/or switching based on other request parameters/environment as well. We don't actually need 2 or more components for this and it has to be part of the Controller_Action_Helpers. That's what I think. Any views on this for a future release!? On 1/31/08, *Matthew Weier O'Phinney* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- Inash Zubair [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (on Thursday, 31 January 2008, 04:55 PM +0500): Sorry I missed sending this previously to the list. Here it is now. I'm assuming the purpose of this component is to detect the type of client and customize the output to fit it's capabilities. There is a similar component already in the incubator for version 1.5 and probably that will be rolled out with the PR version of 1.5 that is Zend_Controller_Action_Helper _ContextSwitch which does something similar. Matthew: Is there a possibility both these proposals could be glued!? The purpose is similar as far as I know but how the context is determined is different. ContextSwitch currently only looks for a given parameter in the request. However, once we have UserAgent detection, I can write support for that into ContextSwitch. UserAgent support will *not* happen by 1.5, however. On 1/31/08, Matthew Weier O'Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- Simone Carletti [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (on Wednesday, 30 January 2008, 09:52 PM +0100): a friend of mine created the best ASP class for user agent sniffing. It's a long time project, started more than 5 years ago. It's called WBStat. http://www.useragents.org/develop-wbstat.asp 4 years ago I created a tracking tool and this class was part of the application core. We made a kind of partnership: I was in charge of providing the class tons of new user agents and my friend was in charge of updating the database. This is the result: http://www.useragents.org/ Probably on of the huge useragent database, daily updated with * 153 browsers, * 221 robots, * 89 operating systems * 2045 unique user-agent string (the real database is more than 400k user agents) Have a look at what the class can do just from an user agent! http://www.useragents.org/develop-wbstat.asp?w=demo I always promised to myself (and to him!) to create a PHP porting of this excellent tool for ZF. You should definitely have a look at the class. It is Italian based but the code is international! ;) The class is just the core, client definitions are stored in 3 external XML files that can be easily adapted to ZF needs. You should definitely have a look at this wonderful piece of code. :) Before he does, what is the license? Depending on the license, we may not be able to accept such a port... On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Christer Edvartsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have created a page in the wiki that will hold the proposal for a Zend_UserAgent component. The proposal does not hold that much information yet, but I will add some more as soon as I get some feedback from you guys. It's located at http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFPROP/ Zend_UserAgent+-+Christer+Edvartsen The component is supposed to be used to classify user agents into some predefined categories. I suggest the following categories
[fw-general] Fisheye offline?
http://framework.zend.com/fisheye/browse/Zend_Framework Proxy Error The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server. The proxy server could not handle the request GET /fisheye/browse/Zend_Framework. Reason: Error reading from remote server From JIRA i get the following error Error communicating with FishEye: java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Fisheye-offline--tp15224145s16154p15224145.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Proposal for a user agent component
I contacted him and he said this is not really an issue. He can adapt the license or provide custom permission for such this derived work. He hasn't posted here an answer yet because - he said - my English is not really understandable. :) On Fri, Feb 1, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Kevin Golding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] , Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes On 31/01/2008, Matthew Weier O'Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Simone Carletti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (on Wednesday, 30 January 2008, 11:19 PM +0100): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.5 Generic Additionally, you should consider I already talked with my friend about the idea of a PHP porting and he was more than happy. I guess license or permission is not really a problem. Excellent -- I'll have somebody on the Zend team verify that this is a compatable license; I'm not sure what our policy is on attribution. Wouldn't the NonCommercial part be a problem? (As in: IIRC the New BSD license allows commercial usage) Share Alike is also more GPL than BSD. Also, it must be said there's a reason attribution was dropped from most BSD style licenses (i.e. it became a complete pain). I assumed by Simone's comments though that his friend was happy to change the license to something that was compatible. Kevin
Re: [fw-general] Proposal for a user agent component
Hi Christer, a friend of mine created the best ASP class for user agent sniffing. It's a long time project, started more than 5 years ago. It's called WBStat. http://www.useragents.org/develop-wbstat.asp 4 years ago I created a tracking tool and this class was part of the application core. We made a kind of partnership: I was in charge of providing the class tons of new user agents and my friend was in charge of updating the database. This is the result: http://www.useragents.org/ Probably on of the huge useragent database, daily updated with * 153 browsers, * 221 robots, * 89 operating systems * 2045 unique user-agent string (the real database is more than 400k user agents) Have a look at what the class can do just from an user agent! http://www.useragents.org/develop-wbstat.asp?w=demo I always promised to myself (and to him!) to create a PHP porting of this excellent tool for ZF. You should definitely have a look at the class. It is Italian based but the code is international! ;) The class is just the core, client definitions are stored in 3 external XML files that can be easily adapted to ZF needs. You should definitely have a look at this wonderful piece of code. :) -- Simone On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Christer Edvartsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have created a page in the wiki that will hold the proposal for a Zend_UserAgent component. The proposal does not hold that much information yet, but I will add some more as soon as I get some feedback from you guys. It's located at http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFPROP/Zend_UserAgent+-+Christer+Edvartsen The component is supposed to be used to classify user agents into some predefined categories. I suggest the following categories: * Browser * RSS Reader * Mobile Device * Robot A Zend_Controller_Action helper could also be made by using this component but I guess something like this could live outside of a typical MVC application so I suggest it as a separate component. There are several user agent databases out there, and the one I was thinking about using is http://www.user-agents.org/ which has an extensive list of user agent strings. One problem is that the database does not have the Mobile device category. The list is huge though (2500+ user agents) and I don't think it would be necessary to use _every_ user agent string in that database. Does anyone have any ideas of how to decide of what list we could use for something like this? The component will be made in such a manner that developers can add their own list/database if they think the one we provide is not sufficient. The component could also be extended to fetch some more detalied information about mobile devices using WURFL (http://wurfl.sourceforge.net/). Any comments? -- Christer Edvartsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://cogo.wordpress.com/
Re: [fw-general] Proposal for a user agent component
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.5 Generic Additionally, you should consider I already talked with my friend about the idea of a PHP porting and he was more than happy. I guess license or permission is not really a problem. -- Simone On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 11:04 PM, Matthew Weier O'Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- Simone Carletti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (on Wednesday, 30 January 2008, 09:52 PM +0100): a friend of mine created the best ASP class for user agent sniffing. It's a long time project, started more than 5 years ago. It's called WBStat. http://www.useragents.org/develop-wbstat.asp 4 years ago I created a tracking tool and this class was part of the application core. We made a kind of partnership: I was in charge of providing the class tons of new user agents and my friend was in charge of updating the database. This is the result: http://www.useragents.org/ Probably on of the huge useragent database, daily updated with * 153 browsers, * 221 robots, * 89 operating systems * 2045 unique user-agent string (the real database is more than 400k user agents) Have a look at what the class can do just from an user agent! http://www.useragents.org/develop-wbstat.asp?w=demo I always promised to myself (and to him!) to create a PHP porting of this excellent tool for ZF. You should definitely have a look at the class. It is Italian based but the code is international! ;) The class is just the core, client definitions are stored in 3 external XML files that can be easily adapted to ZF needs. You should definitely have a look at this wonderful piece of code. :) Before he does, what is the license? Depending on the license, we may not be able to accept such a port... On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Christer Edvartsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have created a page in the wiki that will hold the proposal for a Zend_UserAgent component. The proposal does not hold that much information yet, but I will add some more as soon as I get some feedback from you guys. It's located at http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFPROP/ Zend_UserAgent+-+Christer+Edvartsen The component is supposed to be used to classify user agents into some predefined categories. I suggest the following categories: * Browser * RSS Reader * Mobile Device * Robot A Zend_Controller_Action helper could also be made by using this component but I guess something like this could live outside of a typical MVC application so I suggest it as a separate component. There are several user agent databases out there, and the one I was thinking about using is http://www.user-agents.org/ which has an extensive list of user agent strings. One problem is that the database does not have the Mobile device category. The list is huge though (2500+ user agents) and I don't think it would be necessary to use _every_ user agent string in that database. Does anyone have any ideas of how to decide of what list we could use for something like this? The component will be made in such a manner that developers can add their own list/database if they think the one we provide is not sufficient. The component could also be extended to fetch some more detalied information about mobile devices using WURFL (http://wurfl.sourceforge.net/). Any comments? -- Christer Edvartsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://cogo.wordpress.com/ -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney PHP Developer| [EMAIL PROTECTED] Zend - The PHP Company | http://www.zend.com/
Re: [fw-general] ZF Packaging
On Jan 28, 2008 3:57 PM, Richard Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: zfdev.com is a community supported project that never really took off, It was never an official repository though. Sorry Richard, my misunderstanding. :) Thanks for pointing it out. Simone
Re: [fw-general] ZF Packaging
AFAIK, an unofficial PEAR channel for Zend Framework has already being created at http://code.google.com/p/zend/ Wil, I don't know if you noticed Zend Framework FAQ page talks about an official(?) PEAR channel at http://pear.zfdev.com/ http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFUSER/Frequently+Asked+Questions Additionally, http://pear.zfdev.com/ is no longer available. I think this information should be removed. Do you agree? Simone On Jan 23, 2008 8:42 PM, Wil Sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In any case, there are- and almost surely will always be- those users who won't want to use PEAR, and we will continue to make the installation process simple for them. At this point it seems that the best option is a tarball with possibly some CLI support for downloading some optional code/data. We do appreciate the distribution/versioning/dependency management issues in general packaging systems, and we certainly wouldn't take on something this ambitious at this point. We'll only add support for minimal distribution capabilities to the CLI if we can simplify requirements for a ZF-specific setup in a way that doesn't have nasty side effects or gets us in to dependency hell. Hope that sheds some light on the issue from our side. ,Wil *From:* Kevin McArthur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Wednesday, January 23, 2008 9:11 AM *To:* Pádraic Brady *Cc:* fw-general@lists.zend.com *Subject:* Re: [fw-general] ZF Packaging No time for a big rant today, 1. No versioned/split sub-packages. (decided long ago) 2. Versioned paths in pear breaks pear standard operating method. May be confusing for that reason. Pear Upgrade ZendFramework _must_ be avoided if it will change files to newer functional versions. 3. How would you deploy security fixes to existing version releases. 4. There has been talk/work on a CLI tool for bootstrapping anyway, just seems installation would be a natural extension as one command could download/install and bootstrap to prevent any pathing problems. K Pádraic Brady wrote: To remark on some of the PEAR FUD. PEAR doesn't remove the ability to download, decompress, copy and otherwise manually manage the source code - essentially it just takes a default action of downloading, decompressing, and copying into the /php/pear directory which should already be present on the PHP include_path in php.ini which alleviates one more include_path search for those getting a bit worried about having 2. The proposed download archives for Core/Extras/etc. can merrily continue their existence. They wouldn't even share the same subdomain... Does it preclude path versioning? I can script an entire PEAR system into existence using Phing based on any array of preferred version numbers - especially since PEAR does allow you to force installation of one specific version irrespective of it's status or age. Last I checked the basic PEAR installed in under 5 minutes. There is also version compatibility control built into PEAR since you can set a preferred-version on all dependencies package by package. This means control over specific preferred versions for any remote system is a doddle. The only manual intervention would be changing the include_path for the application... Finally, the ZF is a componentised framework - not a fragile stack of cards that will fall apart in PEAR - everyone did quite a good job of ensuring classes/components are decoupled. I would agree that at a minimum there would have to be a Core package of say the MVC components to form the basic installation base for immediate use - everything else could be made a self-contained package available across PEAR, with aggregated commands to install specific bundles of packages (perhaps reflecting the proposed download split). Then one could: pear channel-discover pear.framework.zend.com pear install zend/Zend_Core pear install zend/Zend_Services_Flickr pear install --force zend/Zend_Pdf-1.1.2 Not saying the PEAR route is any easier than whatever CLI option Will is considering - but PEAR does have the advantage of being in this distribution business for long enough to learn substantial lessons. The main disadvantage is packaging everything to start with - not a simple task and something for whoever maintains the current ZF build.xml to look into. At the moment for Phing, I'm leaning on work from Travis Swicegood who wrote a lean and mean PEAR packaging task for Phing over on pear.domain51.com. Best regards, Paddy Karl Katzke wrote: A better example might be Python Eggs. You can unpack them to a directory of your choosing using a simple CLI-bootstrap file. Symfony does use Pear, but Symfony is not very shared-hosting friendly -- and Zend *is* shared-hosting friendly, which is something that I would very much like to see the community maintain. -K On Jan 22, 2008 6:12 PM, Kevin McArthur [EMAIL
Re: [fw-general] rails migration like in ZF ? Or how do you sync dev. db-production db ?
Actually no migration system is part of Zend Framework. There's just a proposal http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFPROP/Zend_Db_Schema_Manager+-+Rob+Allen Simone On Jan 24, 2008 1:47 AM, Nicolae Namolovan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi dear list, Is there anything similar to rails migration file in Zend Framework ? I'm creating now a new table on mine development database, and after I want to migrate this to the production one, how to achieve this in a nice way ? Now I'm doing.. into the mysql console, show create table `table name`; Copypaste to mysql console on production.. To change anything alter table.. Horrible.. How do you do this in a nice way ? -- Sincerely, Nicolae Namolovan.
Re: [fw-general] 1.5 and backwards compatibilty. . .
wllm wrote: *If you have made an API or behavior change for 1.5 that is not backwards compatible, please notify me ASAP.* In order to fix http://framework.zend.com/issues/browse/ZF-1308 I changed the method name, however it was previously declared as private thus I suppose there's no BC issue here. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/1.5-and-backwards-compatibilty.-.-.-tp14915193s16154p14921159.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Issuetracker stopped
I'm getting the following error response. Proxy Error The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server. The proxy server could not handle the request GET /fisheye/browse/Zend_Framework. Reason: Error reading from remote server -- Simone Darby Felton wrote: Hi Thomas, I've restarted Tomcat for JIRA and Confluence, and it looks like they're back up now. Thanks for the report! Best regards, Darby Thomas Weidner wrote: Hy, it seems that the issue tracker has stopped since 30 minutes... Please restart. Thanks Thomas -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Issuetracker-stopped-tp14755935s16154p14793267.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[fw-general] Zend_Service_Technorati almost ready for core
Hello list, I'm glad to inform you that Zend_Service_Technorati is almost ready for core. Many improvements have been done in the last weeks both in library and unit tests. More details available at http://framework.zend.com/issues/browse/ZF-2334 As Darby suggested, it would be great to receive any feedback from the community about class usage or features, to be able to make the last changes before integrating (I hope) the component into ZF core package. Each component class and method includes a documentation block, thus Zend_Service_Technorati should be easy to use. If you need further details, a XML Docbook documentation is also available at http://framework.zend.com/fisheye/browse/Zend_Framework/trunk/incubator/documentation/manual/en/module_specs/Zend_Service_Technorati.xml -- Simone (crossposted to general/webservice mailing list)
[fw-general] Old (?) TODO files in core distribution
Hi list, I was reading the code of Zend_Mail and Zend_Json for the manual translation and I discovered the following files: library/Zend/Mail/TODO.txt -- ./. (nothing more) library/Zend/Json/TODO.txt -- * Unit tests Json/TODO.txt was added by thomas on r3576 http://framework.zend.com/fisheye/changelog/Zend_Framework/trunk/library/Zend/Json?cs=3576 Unit tests for Zend_Json have been added by stas on r5927 http://framework.zend.com/fisheye/changelog/Zend_Framework/trunk/tests/Zend/Json?cs=5927 and, probably, the TODO file has never been removed. I think both files can be removed. :) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Old-%28-%29-TODO-files-in-core-distribution-tp14551105s16154p14551105.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Old (?) TODO files in core distribution
Sorry Thomas, I probably didn't check a parent revision. Anyway, I assume it doesn't change the meaning behind my post. :) In fact, it gives it more sense. ;) Thomas Weidner-2 wrote: Json/TODO.txt was added by thomas on r3576 http://framework.zend.com/fisheye/changelog/Zend_Framework/trunk/library/Zend/Json?cs=3576 Wrong assumption. The file was added by mike with rev. 6. Revision 3576 was a coding standard issue where windows line feeds were changed to unix by about 1/2 of the whole framework. Greetings Thomas I18N Team Leader -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Old-%28-%29-TODO-files-in-core-distribution-tp14551105s16154p14551627.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[fw-general] RE: [fw-core] RE: [fw-general] Reducing the number of loaded exception files
Sorry to resurrect this old post, but I need a final feedback. I'm sure I posted this request before, but the email was probably refused by Nabble. Wil, do you confirm the last (and definitive for now) suggestion is to hold on, waiting for more performance tests? If so, I would suggest to post a comment or add a note to current wiki page http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFDEV/Lazy-loading+Exceptions -- Simone wllm wrote: They will be published on the framework site in a prominent location. Whether that is on the wiki or somewhere else has yet TBD. As for the timing, the scope, and the format of the tests/results, we are shooting for sometime within a few weeks after the 1.5 release, the scope would be broad and deep enough to be useful for optimization in both ZF and most applications (although we may or may not run other frameworks through the same benchmarks for comparison or tests against every component in ZF), and the format of the tests/results is entirely TBD (you can rest assured they will be designed to reveal any areas for improvement; we're not looking for transparency- not marketing materials- here). In addition, we hope to establish a reusable set of benchmarks and tests; everyone should be aware, however, that results can't be directly compared across different environments except WRT well defined variables such as whether an opcode cache was used or not. If anyone has any suggestion for specific scenarios or areas we should be testing, please post them to fw-general. Also, I know that it has been mentioned before, but it's worth repeating. On the framework team we seek to strike the best balance between performance and ease of development and maintainability. If all applications were designed with only performance in mind, we would live in a very different technical world with far fewer innovations and a much longer time-to-market across almost all technical domains- web development would certainly be no exception. I believe most battle-scarred developers and architects would tell you that the most effective performance optimizations happen below the application programming level (witness all the query optimization and rewriting that happens in Oracle, for example; I can tell you that very few people know how to or invest the time to implement these optimization in their own queries and schemas) and that you reach the law of diminishing returns very quickly with the cost of developer time vs. additional hardware (hosting cost, etc.) nowadays. AFAIK, opcode caches are a perfect example of developer-transparent performance optimization. I hope that gives you some insight in to how we prioritize work for ZF; for Zend Framework it means that we will be busy in the next month delivering a lot of the features that our users have been asking for, and performance improvements that are exposed by benchmarks may have to wait for subsequent mini or minor releases after 1.5. That said, if anyone in the community has a great performance improvement that they can back up with benchmarks- especially if it is transparent to the developer- there is still time to get it in to 1.5! :) ,Wil -Original Message- From: Eric Coleman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2007 10:00 PM To: Wil Sinclair Cc: Philip G; fw-general; fw-core Subject: Re: [fw-core] RE: [fw-general] Reducing the number of loaded exception files When and where will these results be published? Regards, Eric On Dec 15, 2007, at 9:58 PM, Wil Sinclair wrote: Hey guys, sorry I didn't get a chance to reply to this thread until now. While I might not be an expert on performance tuning in PHP, I believe there are a few best practices that apply to all languages and frameworks out there. Foremost among these is never increase code complexity before having reasonable benchmarks to give you a decent 'before' and 'after' picture of the optimization. I realize that PHP is somewhat unique in the benefit it can realize from an opcode cache, so I would expect these figures for both opcode-cached and -uncached installations. I also realize the extent of the complexity that might be introduced- in fact, we might be able to simplify the lazy-loading of exception classes further by introducing a factory method- possibly in the Zend_Loader class- which doesn't make for a whole hell of a lot of complexity. That said, it does add SOME complexity to the framework, since we either have to include the exception class in more places than we had to previously or we would have to prescribe a different method of exception class loading than the most basic suggested usage at the language level, and is therefore subject to the rule of thumb I mention above. Fortunately, we plan to do a performance audit of framework in the 1.5 timeframe that will create exactly these benchmarks to test against going forward.
[fw-general] 'Who is responsibile for each component' wiki page
http://framework.zend.com/wiki/x/HCs Is this page updated? Is it better to rely on that page, on the excel file http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pMy3PL3bQqZqlteLWg43HDg or any other resource to find a component assignee? :) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/%27Who-is-responsibile-for-each-component%27-wiki-page-tp14552008s16154p14552008.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Mail Bug?
It would be helpful if you post here a sample code you use for sending emails. A real example would be wonderful. :) -- Simone Jacky Chen-2 wrote: Hi all, I send mail with Zend_Mail,and i received the mail body as following.What is the problem? =E5=96=84=E8=B5=84=E6=96=99?= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; charset=utf8; boundary==_a63f032d182e04daf6311fe5329bef65 MIME-Version: 1.0 --=_a63f032d182e04daf6311fe5329bef65 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =E4=BA=B2=E7=88=B1=E7=9A=84=E7=94=A8=E6=88=B7=E6=82=A8=E5=A5=BD=EF=BC=81p= =E6=AC=A2=E8=BF=8E=E5=8A=A0=E5=85=A5HeySpace=E5=A4=A7=E5=AE=B6=E5=BA=AD= =EF=BC=8C=E8=AF=B7=E7=82=B9=E5=87=BB=E4=BB=A5=E4=B8=8B=E9=93=BE=E6=8E=A5= =E5=AE=8C=E5=96=84=E6=82=A8=E7=9A=84=E8=B5=84=E6=96=99=EF=BC=9Abr / /passport/register/email/jacky.hf%40gmail.com/active/ec= 61998014a83f48a84e0b3dbafeb01f /p --=_a63f032d182e04daf6311fe5329bef65 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =E4=BA=B2=E7=88=B1=E7=9A=84=E7=94=A8=E6=88=B7=E6=82=A8=E5=A5=BD=EF=BC=81p= =E6=AC=A2=E8=BF=8E=E5=8A=A0=E5=85=A5HeySpace=E5=A4=A7=E5=AE=B6=E5=BA=AD= =EF=BC=8C=E8=AF=B7=E7=82=B9=E5=87=BB=E4=BB=A5=E4=B8=8B=E9=93=BE=E6=8E=A5= =E5=AE=8C=E5=96=84=E6=82=A8=E7=9A=84=E8=B5=84=E6=96=99=EF=BC=9Abr / /passport/register/email/jacky.hf%40gmail.com/active/ec= 61998014a83f48a84e0b3dbafeb01f /p --=_a63f032d182e04daf6311fe5329bef65-- -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Zend_Mail-Bug--tp14521843s16154p14532427.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] SVN server has problem?
Hello Jason, I renamed the file in my local working copy and it seems remote repository made a little confusion understanding TestBlogPostTagsError is different than TestBlogpostTagsError. I fixed the issue in revisions http://framework.zend.com/fisheye/changelog/Zend_Framework/?cs=7245 and http://framework.zend.com/fisheye/changelog/Zend_Framework/?cs=7244 , please let me know if you notice any additional problem. If so, please delete _files folder from your working copy and run svn update. -- Simone qry wrote: It is ok now. Don't know what happened Jason. Jason Qi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, It said this file E:\ZendFramework-trunk\incubator\tests\Zend\Service\Technorati\_files\TestBlogPostTagsError.xml was not under version control. Even I deleted all files under \_files\ and did update, did not work. Cleanup stopped and gave error message that it was not under version control If it is not under version control, where does it come from ? I am sure I deleted the whole folder of \_files. Anyone know what the problem is? Thanks and Happy Holiday! Jason. - Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. - Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SVN-server-has-problem--tp14482787s16154p14488406.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] List Problems?
My first message, yesterday, about translation pages took more than 4 hours to be published. I post directly from a nabble account and there was a message telling me the message has been refused by the list. Then, it magically appeared. Additionally, I'm actually noticing a really annoying centered text alignment of the mailing list. Someone else has the same problem? :| -- Simone wllm wrote: Some of you have been reporting undelivered mail in fw-i18n and now fw-general. Please let me know off-list if you're having a problem so we can track it down. Also, if you have an urgent message, I'd be happy to post it for you. :) ,Wil -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/List-Problems--tp14393105s16154p14407009.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] List Problems?
It seems someone else is having the same 'text is centered' problem. http://www.nabble.com/Re-3A--fw-mvc--Layout-on-Nabble.com-to14407577s16154.html -- Simone Federico Cargnelutti wrote: Same here. An email I sent today to the zf-general/zf-core list was never delivered. I also see the centred text and a message I posted yesterday using the site was accepted a couple of hours later. Simone Carletti wrote: My first message, yesterday, about translation pages took more than 4 hours to be published. I post directly from a nabble account and there was a message telling me the message has been refused by the list. Then, it magically appeared. Additionally, I'm actually noticing a really annoying centered text alignment of the mailing list. Someone else has the same problem? :| -- Simone wllm wrote: Some of you have been reporting undelivered mail in fw-i18n and now fw-general. Please let me know off-list if you're having a problem so we can track it down. Also, if you have an urgent message, I'd be happy to post it for you. :) ,Wil -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/List-Problems--tp14393105s16154p14407644.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Project Teams and Separate Mailing Lists. . .
Hi Wil, I agree that too many lists could create confusion. However, merging all lists into a single one might create more confusion than a list for each team. I would personally suggest at least two lists, one for end users topics and one focused on development of the framework itself... as a starting point. Talking about project teams and wiki... I saw you just moved the most part of pages under /archive group that is write protected. It means, for instance, we cannot edit any team or translation page, such as http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ARCHIVE/Italian+%28Italiano%29 Is there any wiki reorganization in action? -- Simone wllm wrote: Does anybody find the concept of project teams (as laid out here: http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFDEV/Project+Teams) worthwhile? That is to say, not just occasionally useful, but actually worth the extra effort to maintain and the additional complexity that they add to the overall project? Most of the project team pages on the wiki are woefully out of date at this point, and I happen to be very skeptical about any process or structure that isn't part of any critical workflow for a project- they tend to get abandoned as soon as higher-priority and more immediate tasks come up- as these seem to have been. Also- separate mailing lists- same question. Only 3 lists get more than the occasional mail: general, mvc, and db. I'd venture to guess that most of us subscribe to all 3 of these, and people tend to cross-post or post specific questions in general if they want to make sure everyone reads them anyways. Our traffic across all mailing lists adds up to about 5-10 mails per day, which IMO is a nice lively- but not overwhelming- mail rate on a list. If you think that some of these separate lists are useful, why and which ones? Please keep in mind the potential confusion of those new to framework who have a question and may not know which place is best to post it or that some of these lists are not widely read. Thanks for any feedback. ,Wil -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Project-Teams-and-Separate-Mailing-Lists.-.-.-tp14360219s16154p14370312.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Project Teams and Separate Mailing Lists. . .
@ Thomas My best congratulations to you and all the German translation team! You've done an excellent job. @ Wil Your proposal sounds good. If you don't want to restore a full translation project directory I would suggest to provide at least a page for each translation with a common header as you suggested before and a centralized page including the basic information about how to start and contribute to a translation. I probably would never started this Italian adventure without this information and I guess other users would abandon the idea without a clear and friendly page about how to get involved into a localized translation. -- Simone On Dec 17, 2007 9:56 PM, Wil Sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, then it seems reasonable to leave that up to the discretion of the lead. Teams could appear at the top of the custom content and look pretty much exactly the same as they look on most of the pages now. I think if we attempt to push this concept for all translations, we'll end up out of date for the less active ones. BTW, Thomas, the German translation is a perfect example of a lead taking initiative and really getting the job done. ;) 100%- that's awesome! Unless you guys need them in the next few hours, I'll move them back in to the development tree as proposed after I get home tonight. ,Wil -Original Message- From: Thomas Weidner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 12:47 PM To: Wil Sinclair; Simone Carletti Cc: fw-general@lists.zend.com Subject: Re: [fw-general] Project Teams and Separate Mailing Lists. . . As team leader of the german development team I found it very handy that have a status for the translation members. Which part has to be translated, which was already proof-read, to have a list of members, who is working on what and so on. Now that we have 100% translated for german I don't need it anymore, but I think other language leads could find it very handy. The manual status page is sometimes not enough information. My 2 cents. Thomas I18N and German Team Lead - Original Message - From: Wil Sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Simone Carletti [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: fw-general@lists.zend.com Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 8:52 PM Subject: RE: [fw-general] Project Teams and Separate Mailing Lists. . . That seems reasonable to me. I don't see any issue with maintaining translation pages in development, but we should make sure we aren't setting ourselves up for getting immediately out of date. As far as I can tell, the areas that go out of date very quickly include the current status of the project, names of people working on the project, etc. And even these wouldn't be an issue if there is a lead maintaining the page, as with the Italian and French pages. So how about this? We can create a standard header for each translation so that all the information that is the same across the translations will appear in the same place, and custom content can go beneath. If no translation lead wants to take ownership of the page, the page will only contain that header, which would include stuff like the language name, a link to the docs on the wiki, and maybe a note that this translation is available for someone to actively lead. All of these pages can go under a new 'translations' page under the documentation guide (http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFDEV/Zend+Framework+Documentat i on+Guide). If we find that a translation page has gotten out of date, we can archive the custom content and leave the header. Do you find the concept of a 'translation team' useful? If so, what does it bring us? The other project team pages seemed to bring little value and mostly served to list the names of people who said they would help, but were busy when it came to the actual 'helping' part. J ,Wil From: Simone Carletti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 10:49 AM To: Wil Sinclair Cc: fw-general@lists.zend.com Subject: Re: [fw-general] Project Teams and Separate Mailing Lists. . . Because translation activity is strictly part of Zend Framework development and improvements, and follows an internal workflow, including an SVN powered storage, I would suggest to think about a translation section under development area. Additionally, I remember I didn't provide much credit to User Space section when I first came across ZF framework, many months ago. I jumped directly to development section. I had a look to user area just a few weeks later, when I started to get involved into ZF development. This is why I think the translation section could find a better place under the development area. If you feel more comfortable it is possible to start with a small set of pages to reduce the number of outdated pages, including howto guidelines and other helpful
Re: [fw-general] : exception 'Zend_Feed_Builder_Exception' with message 'title key of source property is missing'
What do you mean with this in 'why is Zend_Feed not doing this'?
Waigani wrote:
Yeah, checked both those things, no luck. I've a typo in my last message -
I meant to say 'why is Zend_Feed not doing this'? Here is my full function
(there must be something missing???):
function sendAction() {
// prepare an array that our feed is based on
$feedArray = array ('title' = 'Test Feed 123',
'link' = 'test.com',
//'lastUpdate' = (0 == $posts-count() ? date('c',
strtotime()) :
date('c')),
'charset' = 'utf-8',
'description' = 'First test feed',
'author' = 'Jesse Meek', 'email' = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]',
'copyright' = 'University, all rights reserved',
'generator' = 'Zend Framework Zend_Feed',
'language' = 'en',
'entries' = array (
array( 'title' = 'Item One',
'link' = 'test.com,
'description' = 'this is a test feed', //'lastUpdate' =
strtotime($post-updated),
'content' = 'Hello, this is the content')
)
);
// create feed document
$feed = Zend_Feed::importArray ( $feedArray, 'rss' );
$feed-send();
$this-_helper-viewRenderer-setNoRender();
}
Simone Carletti wrote:
Be sure you do not add any ? at the end of php-only files and you do not
print any output before the XML.
Waigani wrote:
The browser prompts me to download a file which has the same name as the
action but no xml extension. When I add the xml extension and delete the
white space before ?xml … the browser then reads the file as expected.
How do I get Zend_Feed not doing this? Is there something I've missed?
Thanks,
Jess
Simone Carletti wrote:
Be sure you set the correct MIME Response Type to application/xml.
Waigani wrote:
Yay it works! Thank you. But now the browser does not recognise the
xml. I'm probably missing something obvious as I'm new to feeds:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
rss xmlns:content=http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/;
version=2.0
channel
title![CDATA[Test Feed]]/title
linktest.com/link
description![CDATA[First test feed]]/description
pubDateMon, 10 Dec 2007 21:28:44 +/pubDate
managingEditor[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jesse Meek)/managingEditor
copyrightUniversity, all rights reserved/copyright
generatorZend Framework Zend_Feed/generator
languageen/language
docshttp://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss/docs
item
title![CDATA[Item One]]/title
linktest.com/link
description![CDATA[this is a test feed]]/description
content:encoded![CDATA[Hello, this is the
content]]/content:encoded
pubDateMon, 10 Dec 2007 21:28:44 +/pubDate
/item
/channel
/rss
Simone Carletti wrote:
Hi Waigani,
entries must be an array of entries and each entry is an array
itself.
This is the right version of your code, you are missing one array
statement.
//Feed Array
$feedArray = array(
'title' = 'Test Feed',
'link' = 'test.com',
//'lastUpdate' = (0 == $posts-count() ? date('c',
strtotime()) : date('c')),
'charset' = 'utf-8',
'description' = 'First test feed',
'author' = 'Jesse',
'email' = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]',
'copyright' = 'University, all rights reserved',
'generator' = 'Zend Framework Zend_Feed',
'language' = 'en',
'entries' = array(
array(
'title' = 'Item One',
'link' = 'test.com',
'description' = 'this is a test feed',
'lastUpdate' = strtotime($post-updated),
'content' = 'Hello, this is the content',
)
)
);
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/%3A-exception-%27Zend_Feed_Builder_Exception%27-with-message-%27title-key-of-source-property-is-missing%27-tp14205926s16154p14291020.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] : exception 'Zend_Feed_Builder_Exception' with message 'title key of source property is missing'
Be sure you set the correct MIME Response Type to application/xml.
Waigani wrote:
Yay it works! Thank you. But now the browser does not recognise the xml.
I'm probably missing something obvious as I'm new to feeds:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
rss xmlns:content=http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/;
version=2.0
channel
title![CDATA[Test Feed]]/title
linktest.com/link
description![CDATA[First test feed]]/description
pubDateMon, 10 Dec 2007 21:28:44 +/pubDate
managingEditor[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jesse Meek)/managingEditor
copyrightUniversity, all rights reserved/copyright
generatorZend Framework Zend_Feed/generator
languageen/language
docshttp://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss/docs
item
title![CDATA[Item One]]/title
linktest.com/link
description![CDATA[this is a test feed]]/description
content:encoded![CDATA[Hello, this is the
content]]/content:encoded
pubDateMon, 10 Dec 2007 21:28:44 +/pubDate
/item
/channel
/rss
Simone Carletti wrote:
Hi Waigani,
entries must be an array of entries and each entry is an array itself.
This is the right version of your code, you are missing one array
statement.
//Feed Array
$feedArray = array(
'title' = 'Test Feed',
'link' = 'test.com',
//'lastUpdate' = (0 == $posts-count() ? date('c',
strtotime()) : date('c')),
'charset' = 'utf-8',
'description' = 'First test feed',
'author' = 'Jesse',
'email' = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]',
'copyright' = 'University, all rights reserved',
'generator' = 'Zend Framework Zend_Feed',
'language' = 'en',
'entries' = array(
array(
'title' = 'Item One',
'link' = 'test.com',
'description' = 'this is a test feed',
'lastUpdate' = strtotime($post-updated),
'content' = 'Hello, this is the content',
)
)
);
Waigani wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to import an array as a feed and get the following error:
'Zend_Feed_Builder_Exception' with message 'title key of source property
is missing' in …/Zend/Feed/Builder.php:368
Here is the code:
//Feed Array
$feedArray = array(
'title' = 'Test Feed',
'link' = 'test.com',
//'lastUpdate' = (0 == $posts-count() ? date('c',
strtotime()) :
date('c')),
'charset' = 'utf-8',
'description' = 'First test feed',
'author' = 'Jesse',
'email' = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]',
'copyright' = 'University, all rights reserved',
'generator' = 'Zend Framework Zend_Feed',
'language' = 'en',
'entries' = array(
'title' = 'Item One',
'link' = 'test.com',
'description' = 'this is a test feed',
'lastUpdate' = strtotime($post-updated),
'content' = 'Hello, this is the content',
)
);
// create feed document
$feed = Zend_Feed::importArray($feedArray, 'rss');
$feed-send();
Here are the lines around 368 in …/Zend/Feed/Builder.php:
if (isset($row['source'])) {
$mandatories = array('title', 'url');
foreach ($mandatories as $mandatory) {
if (!isset($row['source'][$mandatory])) {
throw new
Zend_Feed_Builder_Exception($mandatory key of source property is
missing);
}
}
$entry-setSource($row['source']['title'],
$row['source']['url']);
}
Now I've tried it with and without the 'source' array in the 'entries'
array. I've even tried cutting and pasting what is in the manual:
http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/zend.feed.importing.html
All produce exactly the same error. I'm using 1.03 libraries. Whats
going on?!?
Thanks,
Jess
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/%3A-exception-%27Zend_Feed_Builder_Exception%27-with-message-%27title-key-of-source-property-is-missing%27-tp14205926s16154p14269718.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] : exception 'Zend_Feed_Builder_Exception' with message 'title key of source property is missing'
Be sure you do not add any ? at the end of php-only files and you do not
print any output before the XML.
Waigani wrote:
The browser prompts me to download a file which has the same name as the
action but no xml extension. When I add the xml extension and delete the
white space before ?xml … the browser then reads the file as expected.
How do I get Zend_Feed not doing this? Is there something I've missed?
Thanks,
Jess
Simone Carletti wrote:
Be sure you set the correct MIME Response Type to application/xml.
Waigani wrote:
Yay it works! Thank you. But now the browser does not recognise the xml.
I'm probably missing something obvious as I'm new to feeds:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
rss xmlns:content=http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/;
version=2.0
channel
title![CDATA[Test Feed]]/title
linktest.com/link
description![CDATA[First test feed]]/description
pubDateMon, 10 Dec 2007 21:28:44 +/pubDate
managingEditor[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jesse Meek)/managingEditor
copyrightUniversity, all rights reserved/copyright
generatorZend Framework Zend_Feed/generator
languageen/language
docshttp://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss/docs
item
title![CDATA[Item One]]/title
linktest.com/link
description![CDATA[this is a test feed]]/description
content:encoded![CDATA[Hello, this is the
content]]/content:encoded
pubDateMon, 10 Dec 2007 21:28:44 +/pubDate
/item
/channel
/rss
Simone Carletti wrote:
Hi Waigani,
entries must be an array of entries and each entry is an array itself.
This is the right version of your code, you are missing one array
statement.
//Feed Array
$feedArray = array(
'title' = 'Test Feed',
'link' = 'test.com',
//'lastUpdate' = (0 == $posts-count() ? date('c',
strtotime()) : date('c')),
'charset' = 'utf-8',
'description' = 'First test feed',
'author' = 'Jesse',
'email' = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]',
'copyright' = 'University, all rights reserved',
'generator' = 'Zend Framework Zend_Feed',
'language' = 'en',
'entries' = array(
array(
'title' = 'Item One',
'link' = 'test.com',
'description' = 'this is a test feed',
'lastUpdate' = strtotime($post-updated),
'content' = 'Hello, this is the content',
)
)
);
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/%3A-exception-%27Zend_Feed_Builder_Exception%27-with-message-%27title-key-of-source-property-is-missing%27-tp14205926s16154p14283972.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] : exception 'Zend_Feed_Builder_Exception' with message 'title key of source property is missing'
Hi Waigani,
entries must be an array of entries and each entry is an array itself.
This is the right version of your code, you are missing one array statement.
//Feed Array
$feedArray = array(
'title' = 'Test Feed',
'link' = 'test.com',
//'lastUpdate' = (0 == $posts-count() ? date('c',
strtotime()) : date('c')),
'charset' = 'utf-8',
'description' = 'First test feed',
'author' = 'Jesse',
'email' = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]',
'copyright' = 'University, all rights reserved',
'generator' = 'Zend Framework Zend_Feed',
'language' = 'en',
'entries' = array(
array(
'title' = 'Item One',
'link' = 'test.com',
'description' = 'this is a test feed',
'lastUpdate' = strtotime($post-updated),
'content' = 'Hello, this is the content',
)
)
);
Waigani wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to import an array as a feed and get the following error:
'Zend_Feed_Builder_Exception' with message 'title key of source property
is missing' in …/Zend/Feed/Builder.php:368
Here is the code:
//Feed Array
$feedArray = array(
'title' = 'Test Feed',
'link' = 'test.com',
//'lastUpdate' = (0 == $posts-count() ? date('c',
strtotime()) :
date('c')),
'charset' = 'utf-8',
'description' = 'First test feed',
'author' = 'Jesse',
'email' = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]',
'copyright' = 'University, all rights reserved',
'generator' = 'Zend Framework Zend_Feed',
'language' = 'en',
'entries' = array(
'title' = 'Item One',
'link' = 'test.com',
'description' = 'this is a test feed',
'lastUpdate' = strtotime($post-updated),
'content' = 'Hello, this is the content',
)
);
// create feed document
$feed = Zend_Feed::importArray($feedArray, 'rss');
$feed-send();
Here are the lines around 368 in …/Zend/Feed/Builder.php:
if (isset($row['source'])) {
$mandatories = array('title', 'url');
foreach ($mandatories as $mandatory) {
if (!isset($row['source'][$mandatory])) {
throw new Zend_Feed_Builder_Exception($mandatory
key of source property is missing);
}
}
$entry-setSource($row['source']['title'],
$row['source']['url']);
}
Now I've tried it with and without the 'source' array in the 'entries'
array. I've even tried cutting and pasting what is in the manual:
http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/zend.feed.importing.html
All produce exactly the same error. I'm using 1.03 libraries. Whats going
on?!?
Thanks,
Jess
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/%3A-exception-%27Zend_Feed_Builder_Exception%27-with-message-%27title-key-of-source-property-is-missing%27-tp14205926s16154p14250933.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] ZF Jira/FishEye error
Hi Darby, I confirm it works for me now. Thanks for the quick fix, Wil. -- Simone On Nov 13, 2007 8:03 PM, Darby Felton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Wil, Thanks, that seems to have fixed it for me. :) Maybe others can confirm? Best regards, Darby Wil Sinclair wrote: I have seen those errors come up sporadically in the JIRA logs. This simply indicates that JIRA timed out while waiting for data on the fisheye API connection. The timeout was set to 1 sec, so I just bumped it up to 10 sec to reduce the frequency this error. Please let me know if the fisheye tab comes up slowly after this change, but I doubt it would take more than a few seconds in the worst case. I suspect the reason why this happens in the first place is that fisheye occasionally experiences CPU spikes that slow down all threads in this process. I haven't had a chance to hook up a profiler to fisheye yet to troubleshoot. I'll do this as soon as I have some time to get to the real solution. ,Wil -Original Message- From: Darby Felton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 7:55 AM To: Simone Carletti Cc: fw-general@lists.zend.com; Wil Sinclair Subject: Re: [fw-general] ZF Jira/FishEye error Hi Simone, I confirm the problem from my end. Maybe Wil can help us figure out what's happening? Best regards, Darby Simone Carletti wrote: When I try to open FishEye tab for a ticket I get a Java exception. See for example http://framework.zend.com/issues/browse/ZF-507?page=com.cenqua.fisheye.j ira:fisheye-tabpanel Error communicating with FishEye: java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out Anyone else could confirm the problem?
[fw-general] Broken link in Zend Framework Proposal Process
Hi list, in http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFPROP/Home there's a broken link in the section Please add the milestones section to your proposals. See example here. See example here points to a deleted page (http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFPROP/Sample+Zend_Magic+Proposal+-+John+Doe) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Broken-link-in-Zend-Framework-Proposal-Process-tf4785878s16154.html#a13691494 Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[fw-general] Broken links in Zend Framework Proposal Process Detail
Hi list, there are a few broken links in http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFPROP/Zend+Framework+Proposal+Process+Detail 1. section Proposal Review, around repository (see Zend Framework Subversion Standards). - Link should point to http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFDEV/Subversion+Standards 2. section Incubator components, around according to the Documentation Standard and Zend Framework Testing Standards. - Links should point to http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFDEV/Documentation+Standard and http://framework.zend.com/wiki/display/ZFDEV/Testing+Standards I've a ZF Wiki account and it seems I can update the page, but because I'm not sure about destination paths I decided to post here the issue. -- Simone Carletti -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Broken-links-in-Zend-Framework-Proposal-Process-Detail-tf4539532s16154.html#a12955849 Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
