RE: [fw-general] ZF Open Source Project: Example of Best Practices?
Any word from Forest regarding ZF core component use in current release and where find the 2.0 repository? - Steve W. wllm wrote: From what Forrest has told me, he follows Zend's recommendations for best practices to the letter. I'm CC'ing Forrest in so he can say for sure, but he's currently working on getting the code and infrastructure ready for public consumption. ,Wil -Original Message- From: swilhelm [mailto:st...@studio831.com] Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 11:40 AM To: fw-general@lists.zend.com Subject: RE: [fw-general] ZF Open Source Project: Example of Best Practices? Thanks Wil. You mentioned Digitalus, http://digitaluscms.com. It seems like it might be the best example open source project running on ZF. They mention version 2.0 is under development and will take advantage of more core ZF components, but I can not find a public source repository containing version 2.0. - Steve W. wllm wrote: Simplecloud.org currently runs on EC2 and the next generation of Digitalus. It's even using components of Zend_Service_Amazon and the Simple Cloud API- it's 'cloud native', so to speak. J I may be able to open-source the code, but I'd have to talk with Forrest (creator/maintainer of DigitalusCMS) first. I'm also working on an app called the Simple Cloud Explorer that is designed to demo SCAPI in action. This will definitely be open-sourced and liberally commented/documented, but I can't make any promises on the release date. ,Wil -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/ZF-Open-Source-Project-Example-of-Best-Practices-tp 787830p947922.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/ZF-Open-Source-Project-Example-of-Best-Practices-tp787830p956690.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
RE: [fw-general] ZF Open Source Project: Example of Best Practices?
Thanks Wil. You mentioned Digitalus, http://digitaluscms.com. It seems like it might be the best example open source project running on ZF. They mention version 2.0 is under development and will take advantage of more core ZF components, but I can not find a public source repository containing version 2.0. - Steve W. wllm wrote: Simplecloud.org currently runs on EC2 and the next generation of Digitalus. It's even using components of Zend_Service_Amazon and the Simple Cloud API- it's 'cloud native', so to speak. J I may be able to open-source the code, but I'd have to talk with Forrest (creator/maintainer of DigitalusCMS) first. I'm also working on an app called the Simple Cloud Explorer that is designed to demo SCAPI in action. This will definitely be open-sourced and liberally commented/documented, but I can't make any promises on the release date. ,Wil -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/ZF-Open-Source-Project-Example-of-Best-Practices-tp787830p947922.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] ZF - Where to begin?
I want to second this post. I have used ZF for some projects earlier this year and I am right on the cusp of making a major decision: explore ZF 1.9 more deeply or abandon ZF and PHP altogether for Ruby on Rails. ZF Documentation seems almost passive aggressive, providing examples to get started, but lacking enough information to build, test, and deploy production quality, maintainable websites. Maybe it's a case of the grass is always greener on the other side of the fence but Ruby and RoR seem to be better suited to quickly and easily develop production quality websites. I don't want to start a ZF vs RoR discussion, though that might be interesting. I would like to hear how others have become proficient in building production websites using ZF. - Steve W. Fozzyuw wrote: Hi all, I've been watching and playing with ZF for some time now. Never very deeply at any given time and often putting it down for extended periods of time (version releases). One thing that keeps happening is that ZF is growing quickly. Which is good, but it's also hard to keep up. -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/ZF-Where-to-begin-tp787666p787731.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[fw-general] ZF Open Source Project: Example of Best Practices?
Prompted by Fozzyuw's latest post, I will approach the issue from a different tack. I am looking open source projects that exemplify the best practice use of the Zend Framework and its advanced features. Ideally these projects would: + be under active development + be based on ZF 1.9 + leverage reusable modules + incorporate Auth and ACL (bonus points for OpenId or Facebook Connect support) + provide Zend_Test-based unit tests + deploy from a source repository (e.g. git or svn) + achievs scalability using multiple server load balancing ++ get bonus points they are currently running in production on a cloud platform like EC2 Any recommendations? - Steve W. -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/ZF-Open-Source-Project-Example-of-Best-Practices-tp787830p787830.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[fw-general] Where have all the ZF questions gone?
It seems like the number of daily ZF questions posted to this forum is declining; it appears to average less than a dozen per day. I would have thought with all the new features added this year, questions would be on the rise not declining. Has the ZF development community moved to another forum? - Steve W. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Where-have-all-the-ZF-questions-gone--tp26340774p26340774.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Creating CLI scripts utilizing ZF
I would also like to see a good example of this. Do your CLI scripts require authentication or ACL support? If so, are you handling that as well? - Steve W. So i think the crux of this for me is that Im thinking there has to be a good way to leverage the functionality of the normal Zend_Application bootstrapping process just for the CLI environment - im just not sure of what that *should* look like in general implementation. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Creating-CLI-scripts-utilizing-ZF-tp26084241p26098104.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[fw-general] Is the book Is Zend Framework: The Off icial Programmer’s Reference Guide based on ZF v1.9?
Is the http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1430219068/ref=ord_cart_shr?_encoding=UTF8m=ATVPDKIKX0DERv=glance book , Zend Framework: The Official Programmer's Reference Guide base on ZF 1.9? - Steve W. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-the-book-Is-%22Zend-Framework%3A-The-Official-Programmer%E2%80%99s-Reference-Guide%22-based-on-ZF-v1.9--tp25813410p25813410.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Is there anybody from Zend team ?
I love the Zend Framework's functionality, but so much of how all the necessary components hang together in a production quality Website is difficult to discern. I would like to get all of the following configured and working before I write a single line of application specific code: configuration specified, connect to stub data store that include user login and user role tables, load reusable utility modules, enforce user roles and authentication across the utility modules, include an admin module, enable caching, provide command-line maintenance scripts, expose a subset of the stub data store via a REST api, include a test harness, and manage dev, staging, and production versions of a Website. Right now doing the above seems like a very daunting task using the Zend Framework. I know some will say not all projects need the above, but I would say almost all production Web sites do. Some would say this would be very hard to do without Zend Framework, and I would agree. Buy if there are Websites in production using ZF, they must have solved many if not all of these issues. Why do we all have to reinvent the wheel? - Steve W. Matthew Ratzloff wrote: Framework can't be flexible. If somebody needs flexibility then he can programming in normal PHP without framework. :-) This is an opinion, one to which Zend Framework does not subscribe. There are plenty of PHP frameworks which do subscribe to this opinion. And there's always Rails, which I like, but is very, very different from Zend Framework. I encourage you to change your approach to Zend Framework, rather than expecting Zend Framework to change its approach. You will be much happier without preconceived ideas of how you think the framework should be. -Matt On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 9:16 AM, aoohralex aoohra...@gmail.com wrote: One year ago I knew one person who used Zend Framework. One day he had to modify (add something) somebody's website wrote in Zend Framework but he had to write everything from the beginning. He was then very angry and he said me why. Do you know ? Bacause ZF was so flexible that somebody created this website in horrible way - he said me that everything was wrong, it wasn't MVC and he faster create this website from the beginning then modify it. Framework can't be flexible. If somebody needs flexibility then he can programming in normal PHP without framework. :-) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-there-anybody-from-Zend-team---tp25455352p25475740.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-there-anybody-from-Zend-team---tp25455352p25518320.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Is there anybody from Zend team ?
If these issues caused @aoohralex problems, I can't wait to see his post regarding modules, ACL, form decorators, doing a db join, - Steve W. joedevon wrote: If you do not want to register, if you scroll down further on the page, you'll find direct links. I bet if Zend did some clickstream analysis, you guys would be shocked how many people never see the links on the bottom of the page. I remember the first time I wanted to find out more about Zend Framework, I thought you had to register and even had the feeling that it might cost money. It's only because it was part of a project I was hired for that I eventually learned it. I thought it was only me, but as co-organizer of the PHP Meetup in L.A., more than one person told me it cost money to download. As an experiment, I just now tried to pretend I know nothing about Zend Framework and Googled it, went to the download page, and indeed it's confusing for newbies if they click Full package. This might be affecting adoption rate more than you'd think. I'd suggest more prominent direct links at every stage including the registration page...see if the download numbers are affected. Just my take. (One of the biggest changes of my thinking as a web developer came after speaking to a few marketing pros who analyze the hell out of clickstreams, I learned that the littlest thing on a page can have a drastic effect on success of a site.) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-there-anybody-from-Zend-team---tp25455352p25466127.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Re: [fw-general] Best to use CLI in my ZF 1.9 Application
The issue I have had in the past is when a CLI is trying to leverage an admin module that uses the standard Auth / ACL logic. It expects a login process to populate some username and password information that get passed to the Auth code. It would be nice to see the best practice for having an admin module provide behavior to both a Web-based UI as well as the CLI scripts. - Steve W. lightflowmark wrote: OK, I can certainly look at that. Generally, you'd set the file permissions on the script so it can only be run by the specified user(s) - so, for instance: shell# chown admin_user:admin_group myScript.php shell# chmod 744 myScript.php shell # ls -al -rwxr--r-- 1 admin_user admin_group 3212 Apr 17 1999 myScript.php (can only be executed by the admin_user user) Is this not possible in your setup for some reason? I'm not very familiar with shared hosting setups, so is there something that would prevent you doing this? Thanks for the input, Mark swilhelm wrote: should optionally require admin credentials passed as arguments or should confirm CLI is being run by particular system users (e.g. root). -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Best-to-use-CLI-in-my-ZF-1.9-Application-tp25045676p25240779.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Best practices, environment setup
I would also be interested in such 'best practices.' I am using a git repository and deploying to media temple and slicehost hosted staging and production servers. I would also be interested in seeing how people develop a single admin module that can be leveraged across several different websites (that is to say the code is shared, but the roles, application contollers and user databases differ across sites). - Steve W. Themselves wrote: I've been looking for something like this too. It's all well and fine to install all the Zend products with the intention of integrating them in to a homogenous whole, but the reality is that there's very little in the way of documentation looking at the problem from a broader development perspective. I'm trying to nut my way through and develop my own series of best practices with regards to all this, but my particular sticking point is still the Zend Server to Zend Studio integration, which seems to be focused around using your local machine as the development server - a situation which obviously doesn't scale terribly well. I've tried finding some good examples of using external Zend Server instances via a local Zend Studio, but so far, nothing... On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:28 AM, Robert Gormley rgorm...@mgcare.com wrote: Has anyone got a good pointer to a resource, or able to offer some advice, on a ‘best practices’ set-up for ZF, Server, for use with Studio... Something that’s nicely organized and elegant. Things like - nice ways to address development and test environments on the same server (use of Apache ENV for example, or hostname) - awareness of multiple sites on the same server - other common best practices, like ‘root of the project’ being outside the web root, etc I realize these are all fairly common/well-known things, but I’m trying to find a nice document/blog, what have you, that does a good job of encapsulating a lot of these ‘best practices’. Robert -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Best-practices%2C-environment-setup-tp25180222p25230154.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Re: [fw-general] Best to use CLI in my ZF 1.9 Application
should optionally require admin credentials passed as arguments or should confirm CLI is being run by particular system users (e.g. root). lightflowmark wrote: I'm actually working on a proposal to do exactly this at the moment. What features would people like to see on this? Currently, the proposed Zend_Schedule component will: 1) be run via CLI scripts from the cron 2)uses Zend_Application to load the bootstrap of an existing application to load config, include paths, etc. 3)load user-written classes which define tasks - e.g. mailTasks, databaseTasks, etc. 4)run functions from those classes based on a prefix - e.g. you might have a script running every day which runs all functions prefixed 'daily', which would run mailTasks::daily_Emails(), databaseTasks::daily_DoArchiving(), etc. and another script running every hour which would run all functions prefixes 'hourly' It's actually very simple to implement as outlined, and I'd be interested to see what other features people would want from this. Yours, Mark Raphael Stolt-2 wrote: Hi Stefan, You might also take a look at Zend_Tool_Project_Providers which allow you to create custom providers which handle the scenarios you described in the first mail. Plus by hooking them into the Zend Tool environment you can call them as desired via CLI. Hope that helps a bit. Cheers, Raphael Stolt 2009/8/20 Stefan Sturm stefan.s.st...@googlemail.com Hello, I found this tutorial to setup a cli enviroment: http://webfractor.wordpress.com/2008/08/14/using-zend-framework-from-the-command-line/ But I would like to use Zend_Application to handle this... Perhaps somebody can help me on this. Thanks and greetings, Stefan Sturm -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Best-to-use-CLI-in-my-ZF-1.9-Application-tp25045676p25230433.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Zend Framework admin system scaffolding
+1 on this request. luoshiben wrote: Hi All, I'm about to ramble on in regards to what I need and why, but for those who don't want to read =), here's my question: Does anyone know of a framework or tool set that sits on top of Zend Framework to assist developers in quickly creating a members only or admin-type system? ** Now, if you're still reading, here's my qualification of that question. I don't know if anyone else is like me, but over the last 10 years or so I've had to build a good number of admin or members-only systems for companies I have worked for, side projects, or just hobby sites. I'm talking about the web-based system that managers log into on an intranet to view reports, or the back end system that authorized personnel might log into to manage data of some type. While I've employed different methodologies (and even various web frameworks) in each case to get the job done, I've never felt like the perfect solution has been found. I've either had to build the system from scratch, or take something that was over-done, strip out the fat, and code in the missing features. Basically, the problem is that I want a framework that comes with standard components running out-of-the-box, but one that still gives me full control, flexibility, and robustness as a developer. In other words, I want a component library with MVC like Zend Framework, but with a few of the running-out-of-the-box features that might be found in a CMS. (Insert something about getting cake and eating it too. No framework name pun intended...) More specifically, in regards to these standard components, I'm sure that opinions vary widely and everyone will have their list of must-haves. What I envision is a bare-bones, ready-to-deploy system (for use of a better word) that comes with an application development framework at the base layer, and a few pre-built features already running on the framework. These features would include a simple website, with authentication page, a post-authentication default landing page, and a page or pages (crud systems) to manage users and privileges, along with the underlying role-based access control architecture. A website navigation class or component might be helpful, too. Basically, I want the shell or scaffolding of my system to be in place. Then, all I have to do is start building controllers/actions/models/views/etc for my specific business logic, plug actions into the nav system, and I'm running -- all without having to reinvent the wheel on the same features that are standard every time I have to undertake this sort of project, namely rbac architecture and authentication and access management. Ok, so maybe I've presented a pretty simplistic view of what the system could look like. There are obviously all sorts of issues, different ways of doing things, and a multitude of diverse requirements from project to project, even for the base components I have suggested. However, even if customization or extending were required, I still say that the basic feature set -- however they finally get implemented -- ends up being pretty much the same. The closest thing I've found to this so far is the http://yiiframework.com Yii framework . At this point, however, I need to standardize on Zend Framework. Therefore, after all of that, I repeat my real question: Does anything exist that sits on top of Zend Framework to assist developers in quickly creating a members only or admin-type system? I'm not really looking for conceptual thoughts on the matter. What I'd really love are links to ZF-based frameworks, projects, or extensions, etc. that are being used right now, or examples of how you've used ZF to get the required features described running quickly so that you could concentrate on the more important (and more specific) business logic end of things. Thanks in advance for any feedback or examples that you might have. Cheers! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Zend-Framework-admin-system-scaffolding-tp25057216p25057569.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Is it possible to have library code under module directory in ZF?
Did you getting any direct responses? Did you resolve this problem?
Would be interested in hearing the solution.
- Steve W.
dmitrybelyakov wrote:
I've been fighting it for the whole day now, and it doesn't get any more
clear for me.
The idea is simple, i want to have my library code under one of my module
directories. Like this:
/application/modules/somemodule/
/application/modules/somemodule/controllers
/application/modules/somemodule/models
/application/modules/somemodule/views
/application/modules/somemodule/library
/application/modules/somemodule/library/Exception.php
I would like it to follow ZF naming conventions and have class names
prefixed with a vendor namespace like this:
Shift_Exception extends Exception {
}
Is it possible to setup autoloader somehow to accomplish this?
What i've tried and what doesn't work:
1. Putting the library on the include path and regestering corresponding
namespace (need to put my libary code inside another directory 'Shift')
2. Registering Resource_Autoloader and adding resources - this one seems
better and it allows loading resources from subfolders if they were
correctly added with addResourceType(), but it doesn't seem to work for
the files in the library folder itself, in other words with just the base
Shift_ prefix.
So to state it even more simple: how to autoload namespaced classes from
specified folder??
I would REALLY appreciate any help or advise here as it is starting to be
kind of urgent.
Dmitry.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-have-library-code-under-module-directory-in-ZF--tp24778500p24794074.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Zend Framework + Doctrine Module Autoloader issue
I would really like to see an example of Doctrine integrated as a module as well. - Steve W. dbroderick wrote: I am using ZF 1.8.4 and Doctrine 1.1.2 with a module directory setup of +---application | +---configs | \---modules | +---default | | +---controllers | | \---views | | \---scripts | | +---error | | \---index | +---error | | +---controllers | | \---views | | \---scripts | | \---error | \---user | +---controllers | +---models | | \---generated | \---views | \---scripts | \---index +---library | \---App | \---Application | \---Resource +---public | +---images | \---themes | \---default | \---css \---tests +---application \---library I have a resource file called Doctrine.php in my library folder which does the following: $zla = Zend_Loader_Autoloader::getInstance(); $zla-unshiftAutoloader( array( 'Doctrine', 'autoload' ), 'Doctrine' )-setFallbackAutoloader( true ); $manager = Doctrine_Manager::connection( $this-_getConnectionString() ); $manager = Doctrine_Manager::getInstance(); $manager-setAttribute( Doctrine::ATTR_MODEL_LOADING, Doctrine::MODEL_LOADING_CONSERVATIVE ); $manager-setAttribute( Doctrine::ATTR_PORTABILITY, Doctrine::PORTABILITY_NONE ); $manager-setAttribute( Doctrine::ATTR_AUTOLOAD_TABLE_CLASSES, true ); $manager-setAttribute( Doctrine::ATTR_USE_DQL_CALLBACKS, true ); $manager-setAttribute( Doctrine::ATTR_AUTO_ACCESSOR_OVERRIDE, true ); My config xml file has this: --- snip --- pluginPaths App_Application_Resource![CDATA[App/Application/Resource]]/App_Application_Resource /pluginPaths resources frontController defaultmodule![CDATA[default]]/defaultmodule params prefixDefaultModule![CDATA[true]]/prefixDefaultModule usedefaultcontrolleralways![CDATA[false]]/usedefaultcontrolleralways /params /frontController modules default![CDATA[default]]/default error![CDATA[error]]/error user![CDATA[user]]/user /modules !-- Doctrine application plugin -- doctrine dbtype![CDATA[dbtype]]/dbtype dbhost![CDATA[localhost]]/dbhost dbname![CDATA[dbname]]/dbname dbuser![CDATA[dbuser]]/dbuser dbpass![CDATA[dbpass]]/dbpass /doctrine !-- View application plugin -- view![CDATA[view]]/view /resources --- snip --- The default Module Autoloader is loaded correctly during bootstrapping, making available the default resource types (form, model, dbtable), but I use Doctrine so dbtable is not used and I would like to insert, override or even replace the default resource type(s) with a folder in models that Doctrine uses which is 'generated'. My preference is that when my Resource Plugin which configures Doctrine as my DB layer, also can inject the needed resource type into the default module autoloader, in order to make the configuration available in all modules. I have tried for the past day to get this to work but all of the examples I find are to create a module autoloader in the module bootstrap file which means (as I understand it) that I have to do this for each module bootstrap. I am still new to Zend and struggling a bit with the changes in v1.8, so I may have just missed the example that shows how this is done. Of course my ultimate problem here is that when I try to load a model User.php in the models folder which extends generated\BaseUser.php, the BaseUser class is not found. Thanks, David -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Zend-Framework-%2B-Doctrine-Module-Autoloader-issue-tp24392765p24414344.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[fw-general] Zend Framework book or real world example based on v1.8?
I have been using ZF 1.7 for my last couple of projects. I am looking for a book or a good real world example of v1.8. Looking for a book or example that incorporates: modules, auth acl controlling module-based behavior, cli or rest read/write access to some of the data (again with auth acl control), zend test, and doctrine integration. Thanks in advance for any pointers. - Steve W. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Zend-Framework-book-or-real-world-example-based-on-v1.8--tp24414473p24414473.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Default Module - Bootstrapping and Models
I agree, modules (and auth and acl) should be added to the QuickStart or some other Zend provided example. I can't think of any real world application that will not need these three additional capabilities. - Steve W. Vince42 wrote: Hi, Dalibor Karlović schrieb: I think we should rethink this as it's obvious many people use the default module just like any other so the behavior should be as expected, even if adding an additional option. I circumvented this odd behaviour with http://paste2.org/p/284720 but I think that this is ugly and - if not provided otherwise - ZF should treat the default module exactly as you described it and everybody would expect it to work. Unfortunately the Quickstart is omitting the module topic - and I really think that the module approach should be enforced as it leaves much more room for flexibility, self-contained / autarchic modules etc ... just my two cents. :) -- Cheers,\\|// Vince (o o) ooO-(_)-Ooo- ''' (o)_(o)[ ][0][ ] ô¿ô (=°o°=) World Domination by Copy and Paste [ ][ ][0] -()_()[0][0][0] () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments Ooo. ---.ooO( )- ( )(_/ \_) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Default-Module---Bootstrapping-and-Models-tp24211701p24222781.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] User Registration and Login Management Module - Best Practice Blueprint or Example for 1.8
Thanks for the Auth / Acl suggestions. My choice of subject header may have been misleading. I am more interested in how people separate their code into a modules, particularly modules whose data and UI must be tightly integrated into the final project. User id's and locale information for example will need to be accessed by application specific UI's and included in application specific schemas. Administration, reporting, archiving and other similar functions seem perfect candidates for being modules, but would like to see how others have done so successfully. - Steve W. dmitrybelyakov wrote: swilhelm wrote: I would like see best practice blueprint or example for implementing modules in 1.8. A user registration and login management module would be ideal. Any suggestions? Thanks in advance. - Steve W. Hi, I am at the moment reading an article/tutorial on how to implement and Auth/Acl system with Zend. Sp here is the link: http://codeutopia.net/blog/2009/02/06/zend_acl-part-1-misconceptions-and-simple-acls/ It has 3 parts of tutorial going from simple hardcoded acl with users/usergroups/permissions to building dynamic access control. Hope that helps. Dmitry. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/User-Registration-and-Login-Management-Module---Best-Practice-Blueprint-or-Example-for-1.8-tp23952440p23972955.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[fw-general] User Registration and Login Management Module - Best Practice Blueprint or Example for 1.8
I would like see best practice blueprint or example for implementing modules in 1.8. A user registration and login management module would be ideal. Any suggestions? Thanks in advance. - Steve W. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/User-Registration-and-Login-Management-Module---Best-Practice-Blueprint-or-Example-for-1.8-tp23952440p23952440.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] modules and Zend_Tool
What is the status of Zend_Tool module support? Matthew Weier O'Phinney-3 wrote: -- David Mintz da...@davidmintz.org wrote (on Friday, 01 May 2009, 01:19 PM -0400): I've googled around quite a bit and not been able to figure this out: what is the currently recommended way of creating modules in a project using Zend_Tool? Or creating a modular project to begin with? The support doesn't exist yet. Ralph almost has it ready for people to start testing; look for an announcement soon. I've created a monomodular project with 'zf create project' and I am tempted to muck around with the folder hierarchy by hand, but that would surely break .zfproject.xml -- Matthew Weier O'Phinney Project Lead| matt...@zend.com Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/ -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/modules-and-Zend_Tool-tp23336769p23881234.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] How to get an application resource inside a controller action
I predict we will see this question every so often until the bootstrap
becomes more directly accessible, like the view.
So in a controller's action method, something like:
$this-bootstrap-db;
would be nice.
- Steve W.
Matthew Weier O'Phinney-3 wrote:
-- Vladas Diržys vladas.dir...@gmail.com wrote
(on Tuesday, 26 May 2009, 09:40 PM +0300):
what is the right way to get a db (or any other) resource in the
controller?
Now I'm using following line:
$this-getFrontController()-getParam('bootstrap')-getResource('db');
Is there a better way?
Within your controller, yes, there's an easier way:
$this-getInvokeArg('bootstrap')-getResource('db');
--
Matthew Weier O'Phinney
Project Lead| matt...@zend.com
Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-get-an-application-resource-inside-a-controller-action-tp23728917p23732100.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[fw-general] Zend_Session::regenerateId timing issue in Safari and IE
It appears I have the same http://www.nabble.com/concerned-about-regenerating-id-td13896143.html#a13896143 issue reported back in Nov 2007 by Ergo. I want to regenerate the session id on every request as recommended in the documentation, but there seems to be a timing problem on Safari and IE. If users make several requests very quickly, the session is lost. Ergo suggests a work around, namely calling PHP's session_regenerate_id() directly without the true argument. This seems to work for me, but it appears Zend_Session::regenerateId() stores some internal state that will not be set using this approach. My questions is, should I call session_regenerate_id() directly or is there some other recommended solution? - Steve W. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Zend_Session%3A%3AregenerateId-timing-issue-in-Safari-and-IE-tp23270303p23270303.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] What is this: ?= $this-layout()-sidebar ?
You may wish to read this very interesting
http://blog.astrumfutura.com/archives/373-The-M-in-MVC-Why-Models-are-Misunderstood-and-Unappreciated.html
article by Padraic Brady on Models and their role in the MVC pattern.
I think the section entitled, Models are Classes, Controllers are
Processes, is germane to the design of a sidebar. You might consider
implementing your sidebar as a Model or set of Models that are rendered
using View Partials, possibly one Model / View Partial pair per sidebar
feature (e.g. blogroll, ad unit, etc.).
- Steve W.
Jason DeBord wrote:
Thanks for the replies.
I created a SidebarController with a sidebarAction() function. In
sidebar.phtml I have coded the template for my sidebar. Next, I registered
this with the actionstack like this:
$this-_helper-actionStack('nav', 'nav','default');
$this-_helper-actionStack('sidebar', 'sidebar','default');
This is not a good solution however, because I would have to use the
actionstack in all of my contollers. I want to control what is in the
sidebar from the SidebarController.
I think I can code a Front Controller Plugin??? That will take care of
this
for me... Maybe?
I'm struggling with this step though. Any advice?
Cheers,
J
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Vadim Gabriel vadim...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hey,
Or you could simply overload it.
$layout-sidebar = something here;
Vince.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 1:31 PM, lightflowmark
1...@lightflowinterrupted.com
wrote:
They are placeholders for content to be later inserted into.
Typically, I think, you would have actions called e.g. sidebarAction and
navAction. In each of these you would have a line like
$this-_helper-viewRenderer-setResponseSegment('sidebar');
You would then add these actions to the actionStack, so that on any
request,
these two actions were called in addition to your main action.
Sorry that's a bit terse, but should help you get started.
Jason DeBord wrote:
http://framework.zend.com/manual/en/zend.layout.quickstart.html#zend.layout.quickstart.example
In the above link, what are ?= $this-layout()-nav ? and ?=
$this-layout()-sidebar ?
Are they view helpers? Would someone point me to a resource describing
how
to build one? For example, a template of a sidebar that would be
called
by
?= $this-layout()-sidebar ? .
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/What-is-this%3A-%3C-%3D-%24this-%3Elayout%28%29-%3Esidebar--%3E-tp23011364p23020557.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Vincent Gabriel.
Lead Developer, Senior Support.
Zend Certified Engineer.
Zend Framework Certified Engineer.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/What-is-this%3A-%3C-%3D-%24this-%3Elayout%28%29-%3Esidebar--%3E-tp23011364p23033371.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Zend View vs. Smarty
I found this blog http://hasin.wordpress.com/2008/01/05/once-upon-a-time-there-was-smarty/ post by Hasin Hayder very compelling. Andrei Iarus wrote: Hello there, A lot have been discussed, but anyway it is still difficult to decide. A project is to be developed, and more persons will have to work at it. Those persons will have some experience in ZF and probably also in Smarty. The problem is: what are the advantages and disadvantages of using ZF Template Engine vs. Smarty. How much of you use Smarty? Why do you prefer Smart/Zend_View? I see as advatages for Zend_View: 1. Some packages from ZF use Zend_View (Zend Layout, Zend Form, other examples?), so if we would use Smarty and use those packages (which we'll do), we will need to extend the abstract classes. Also it is possible that new comming features will use Zend_View. 2. Easier to learn than Smarty (right?), as it is clean PHP. As an advantage for Smarty: 1. It is more popular than Zend_View (right?) . 2. It has those built-in common-used functions (ex. excaping functions). 3. One can say it is easier/more pleasant to develop in Smarty (it is for a long time a stand-alone V(iew) component (from MVC) ) What would you decide if you were in my place? Thank you very much in advance. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Zend-View-vs.-Smarty-tp22705952p22754388.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Best coding practice? Form takes too long to load now.
Try running the Firebug profiler, Zend_Db_Profiler_Firebug, to see if its
the database queries are the culprit. I assume you already have indices
defined for the playground_id and device_id columns.
Might be time to switch to a data table like display (e.g. YUI DataTable)
containing a list of all devices with one of the columns being a link to an
device edit form which can simply be a separate page or with a bit more
work dynamically displayed and populated using AJAX.
Populating the data table could then be done with a single select call that
does a join across playgrounds and checkpoints.
- Steve W.
bytte wrote:
I have a form class that creates form elements based on database
information. The problem is that the form takes more than 20 seconds to
load on my localhost. On the web server it's even worse: the form doesn't
load at all because of limited memory resources.
I was hoping you guys could give me some tips on optimizing my form setup.
The web application I'm working on is an online park administration tool
for a company that repairs playground equipment for its clients. Every few
months the company needs to check the status of the playground equipment.
They can do that by filling in the form that loads form fields based on a
few predefined checkpoints.
Eg. Is there still enough sand in the area around the playground device?
etc.
I have a database with a clients table, a playgrounds table, a equipment
table and a checkpoints table. Every client owns a few playgrounds. Every
playground consists of some devices (equipment). And every device has a
few checkpoints that need to be checked. Basically the form displays input
fields for every checkpoint for every device for every playground of that
particular client.
Currently I query the playgrounds table to find all playgrounds the logged
in client owns.
Then for every playground I display a subform.
In the subform I have another subform for every playground device.
Then I query the database to find the checkpoints for every device.
Based on those checkpoints the form displays some form fields in the
devices subform.
Of course I use a lot of foreach() loops to be able to display all
necessary form fields.
foreach($playgrounds as $playground) {
$devices =
$playgrounds-fetchAll($playgrounds-select()-where('playground_id =
?',$playground-id);
foreach($devices as $device) {
$checkpoints =
$checkpoints-fetchAll($checkpoints-select()-where('device_id =
?',$device-id);
foreach($checkpoints as $checkpoint) {
//create form fields
}
}
}
I found that if there's less checkpoints the form loads way quicker. I was
wondering if there's a better way of coding in order to have the form load
faster.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Best-coding-practice--Form-takes-too-long-to-load-now.-tp22309252p22313192.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] lastInsertId()
To expand on jason's comment, adding a call to getAdapter() should fix it.
$contactPersonId = $dbAdvertiserPerson-getAdapter()-lastInsertId();
jasonistaken wrote:
The insert() method of Zend_Db_Table returns the new primary key for the
row.
The lastInsertId() method only exists of Zend_Db_Adapter classes, not the
Table class.
On 27/02/2009 12:30 PM, Bob O wrote:
FYI..all 3 tables have auto_incrementing id fields that are PK's
and when all parts pertaining my problem
i am able to submit all of the other information correctly..
Bob O wrote:
Im having a heck of a time with this one..I have searched high and low,
and what has seemed to be a remedy isnt working for me..
any help would be great
I have 1 form and 3 tables that i submit to with 1 post.
These tables are joined by ids
here is my code
public function createAdvertiser($values, $resellerId)
{
$now = time();
$niceName =
FonRoots_Utilities::toNiceString($values['advertName']);
$personData = array('id' = null,
'username' = $values['username'],
'status' = $values['status'],
'role' = $values['role'],
'first_name' = $values['first_name'],
'last_name' = $values['last_name'],
'email' = $values['person_email'],
'title' = $values['job_title'],
'address' = $values['personAddress1'],
'address2' = $values['personAddress2'],
'city' = $values['personCity'],
'state' = $values['personState'],
'country' = $values['personCountry'],
'postal_code' =
$values['personPostalCode'],
'area_code' = $values['personAreaCode'],
'phone' = $values['personPhone'],
'cell_area_code' =
$values['personCellAreaCode'],
'cell_phone' = $values['personCellPhone'],
'date_created' = $now
);
$dbAdvertiserPerson = new Person();
$dbAdvertiserPerson-insert($personData);
-- My code breaks here..The Person is added
$contactPersonId = $dbAdvertiserPerson-lastInsertId();-- I dont
think this is working?
$locationData = array('id' = null,
'address' = $values['locationAddress1'],
'address2' = $values['locationAddress2'],
'city' = $values['locationCity'],
'state' = $values['locationState'],
'country' = $values['locationCountry'],
'postal_code' =
$values['locationPostalCode'],
'area_code' =
$values['locationAreaCode'],
'phone' = $values['locationPhone'],
'hours_of_operation' =
$values['hoursOfOperation'],
'date_created' = $now
);
$dbAdvertiserLocation = new Location();
$dbAdvertiserLocation-insert($locationData);
$locationId = $dbAdvertiserLocation-lastInsertId();
$advertiserData = array('id' = null,
'advertiser' = $values['advertName'],
'nice_name' = $niceName,
'contact_person_id' =
$contactPersonId,--
Trying to return an id here
'location_id' = $locationId,-- Trying
to
return and here
'reseller_id' = $resellerId,
'date_created' = $now,
'short_description' =
$values['shortDescription'],
'long_description' =
$values['longDescription'],
'url' = $values['advertiserURL'],
'logo_url' = $values['logo'],
'date_created' = $now
);
$dbAdvertiser = new Advertiser();
$dbAdvertiser-insert($advertiserData);
}
-
Bob Hanson
Web Developer
SLC, UT
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/lastInsertId%28%29-tp22253546p22313403.html
Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Any success getting breakpoints to work in NetBeans IDE 6.5 ?
Got it to work. Since I use a custom built version of PHP, I needed to use the custom phpize and php-config when compiling xdebug. Snapshot of Netbeans debugging a ZF controller can be found http://flickr.com/photos/stevewilhelm/3299632622/ here . http://www.nabble.com/file/p22143944/3299632622_3cd4710be0_m.jpg swilhelm wrote: I have been using the NetBeans IDE 6.5 with the PHP plugin with my current ZF-based project. I like many of the features, but I have not yet been able to get Debugging with xdebug, specifically setting breakpoints, to work. Anyone had success? I am running NetBeans 6.5, Mac OS X 10.5.6, PHP 5.2.6, and Firefox 3.0.6. - Steve W. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Any-success-getting-breakpoints-to-work-in-NetBeans-IDE-6.5---tp22133108p22143944.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
[fw-general] Any success getting breakpoints to work in NetBeans IDE 6.5 ?
I have been using the NetBeans IDE 6.5 with the PHP plugin with my current ZF-based project. I like many of the features, but I have not yet been able to get Debugging with xdebug, specifically setting breakpoints, to work. Anyone had success? I am running NetBeans 6.5, Mac OS X 10.5.6, PHP 5.2.6, and Firefox 3.0.6. - Steve W. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Any-success-getting-breakpoints-to-work-in-NetBeans-IDE-6.5---tp22133108p22133108.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Beginner tutorials not on Zend.com
I found the book Zend Framework in Action by Allen, Lo, and Brown very helpful. The source code examples from the book can be found on the publisher's site http://www.manning.com/allen/ here . - Steve W. Jason DeBord wrote: Can you guys recommend the best and very basic Zend Framework tutorials. I've exhausted the Zend site. Thanks. And thanks for the replies to my previous emails. I really appreciate it. Jason DEBORD Limoges, France -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Beginner-tutorials-not-on-Zend.com-tp21958831p21971179.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Continue Processing after an action is completed
Store the data needed for further processing in some persistent queue and use a cron job to poll the further processing queue on regular intervals. - Steve W. Ashley McConnell wrote: Hi Folks, I would like to be able to call an action / respond to the client and then continue on with some further processing. I have tried a couple of things: - Using fork: - http://www.php.net/manual/en/function.pcntl-fork.php This doesn't work on my windows installation and i'm not sure it will be enabled on my hosting. Using a headers hack method:- http://www.brandonchecketts.com/archives/performing-post-output-script-processing-in-php This seems to work the first time, but not the next time you call it. Register Shutdown function http://uk2.php.net/register_shutdown_function This doesn't work at all - it just blocks until the other processing is finished. Is there anything that works with the Zend Framework? Any other ideas? Thanks for your help All the best, Ash -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Continue-Processing-after-an-action-is-completed-tp21900147p21908043.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Zend Framework 1.7.4 is now available!
Wil's post had an unfortunately line break. Issues list can be found http://framework.zend.com/issues/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?requestId=10944 here (login required). wllm wrote: Hi all, It is my pleasure to announce the release of Zend Framework 1.7.4! You can download this new mini release from the ZF download site: http://framework.zend.com/download/latest/ A list of all issues resolved in this release can be found at: http://framework.zend.com/issues/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?requestId=10 944 We'd like to once again thank our generous Zend Framework contributors for all the effort they have put in to this release and the project as a whole. Enjoy! ,Wil -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Zend-Framework-1.7.4-is-now-available%21-tp21797424p21835346.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Zend_Form Radio Buttons in ini file
Try adding the following advertiser.campaignCreate.elements.campaignMessageAttempts.options.multiOptions.1 = 1 advertiser.campaignCreate.elements.campaignMessageAttempts.options.multiOptions.2 = 2 advertiser.campaignCreate.elements.campaignMessageAttempts.options.multiOptions.3 = 3 - Steve W. Bob O wrote: Im trying to set a group of radio buttons inside an .ini file and then display it in the view script using 1 call.. this is the html im trying to create with the ini input type=radio name=message_retry value=1 / 1 input type=radio name=message_retry value=2 / 2 input type=radio name=message_retry value=3 / 3 this is the current .ini segment ; Message Attempts Radio advertiser.campaignCreate.elements.campaignMessageAttempts.t ype = radio advertiser.campaignCreate.elements.campaignMessageAttempts.o ptions.required = false advertiser.campaignCreate.elements.campaignMessageAttempts.o ptions.label = Message Attempts Retry advertiser.campaignCreate.elements.campaignMessageAttempts.o ptions.attribs.id = campaign_frequency advertiser.campaignCreate.elements.campaignMessageAttempts.o ptions.attribs.tabIndex = 27 advertiser.campaignCreate.elements.campaignMessageAttempts.o ptions.attribs.alt = Set Retry Attempts advertiser.campaignCreate.elements.campaignMessageAttempts.o ptions.decorators.type = ViewHelper and then call it in the script like so ?php echo $this-campaignCreateForm-campaignMessageAttempts; ? im just not sure how to set the elements up in the ini file? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Zend_Form-Radio-Buttons-in-ini-file-tp21606880p21613975.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] zend form, sub forms and submit element
Coincidentally, I was testing subforms on Monday. Here is a somewhat
contrived login form created from two subforms.
I took a slightly different approach in that I wanted the form and subforms
created by config files and I am using a form viewscript to render the form.
Code fragments below. Hope this helps.
- Steve W.
//
$config = new Zend_Config_Ini(APPLICATION_PATH .
'/config/forms.ini');
$this-_loginForm = new Zend_Form($config-login-login);
$utilConfig = new Zend_Config_Ini(APPLICATION_PATH .
'/config/utilForms.ini');
$this-_loginForm-addSubForm(new
Zend_Form_SubForm($utilConfig-util-login), 'login');
$this-_loginForm-addSubForm(new
Zend_Form_SubForm($utilConfig-util-minimalInfo), 'minimalInfo');
$element = new Zend_Form_Element_Submit('submit');
$this-_loginForm-addElement($element, 'submit');
$this-_loginForm-setDecorators(
array(
array('ViewScript', array('viewScript'
= 'login/login.phtml'))
)
);
Here are my config files. Notice I am playing setting decorators.type to
ViewHelper to test the control element decoration.
// forms.ini
;; Login Controller
;; Login Form
login.form = login
login.login.action = identify
login.login.method = post
;
login.login.elements.hidden.type = hidden
login.login.elements.hidden.options.value = testing
// utilForms.ini
;; login subform
util.login.subform = true
util.login.subform.name = _login
; username element
util.login.elements.username.type = text
util.login.elements.username.options.validators.alnum.validator = alnum
util.login.elements.username.options.validators.regex.validator = regex
util.login.elements.username.options.validators.regex.options.pattern =
/^[a-z]/i
util.login.elements.username.options.validators.strlen.validator =
StringLength
util.login.elements.username.options.validators.strlen.options.min = 6
util.login.elements.username.options.validators.strlen.options.max = 20
util.login.elements.username.options.required = true
util.login.elements.username.options.filters.lower.filter = StringToLower
util.login.elements.username.options.label = Username:
util.login.elements.username.options.decorators.type = ViewHelper
; password element
util.login.elements.password.type = password
util.login.elements.password.options.validators.strlen.validator =
StringLength
util.login.elements.password.options.validators.strlen.options.min = 6
util.login.elements.password.options.required = true
util.login.elements.password.options.label = Password:
util.login.elements.password.options.decorators.type = ViewHelper
;; minimualInfo subForm
util.minimalInfo.subform = true
util.minimalInfo.subform.name = _minimalInfo
; email element
util.minimalInfo.elements.email.type = text
util.minimalInfo.elements.email.options.validators.notempty.validator =
NotEmpty
util.minimalInfo.elements.email.options.validators.notempty.breakChainOnFailure
= true
util.minimalInfo.elements.email.options.validators.strlen.validator =
StringLength
util.minimalInfo.elements.email.options.validators.strlen.options.min = 1
util.minimalInfo.elements.email.options.validators.strlen.options.max = 50
util.minimalInfo.elements.email.options.required = true
util.minimalInfo.elements.email.options.label = EMail:
; phone element
util.minimalInfo.elements.phone.type = text
util.minimalInfo.elements.phone.options.validators.notempty.validator =
NotEmpty
util.minimalInfo.elements.phone.options.validators.notempty.breakChainOnFailure
= true
util.minimalInfo.elements.phone.options.validators.strlen.validator =
StringLength
util.minimalInfo.elements.phone.options.validators.strlen.options.min = 1
util.minimalInfo.elements.phone.options.validators.strlen.options.max = 15
util.minimalInfo.elements.phone.options.required = false
util.minimalInfo.elements.phone.options.label = Phone:
// Here is the ViewScript views/scripts/login/login.phtml
h1?php echo $this-escape($this-title); ?/h1
?php echo $this-actionMessages();?
pPlease log in here/p
form action=?php echo $this-escape($this-loginForm-getAction()); ?
method=?php echo $this-escape($this-loginForm-getMethod());
?
div id=username class=formLabelUsername:/div?php echo
$this-loginForm-login-username; ?br/
Password:?php echo $this-loginForm-login-password; ?br/
?php echo $this-loginForm-minimalInfo-email; ?br/
?php echo $this-loginForm-minimalInfo-phone; ?br/
?echo $this-loginForm-submit ?
/form
qba_rox wrote:
HI
I have one main form, and two sub forms, and I want to have a common
submit button. But it really doesnt display that button after render
action.
got:
$this-setDecorators(array(
'FormElements',
array('TabContainer', array(
'id' = 'newsTabs',
'style' =
[fw-general] Is Cal Evan's Globals.php a recommended approach
I have been Reading Cal Evan's Guide to Zend Framework Programming. In it he describes a Globals.php file for creating a single class to encapsulate access to global resources like the database connection, cache connection, config, etc. This seems useful, particularly if you use it in conjunction with his Controller_Request_Cli class for exposing some of your Zend-based application via command line or cron jobs. I was wondering if this is the recommended approach to exposing global resources or is there a Zend Framework approved method? - Steve W. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-Cal-Evan%27s-Globals.php-a-recommended-approach-tp21379960p21379960.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] Best practice about a usage
For utility functions that are used by actions, you may want to create http://devzone.zend.com/article/3350-Action-Helpers-in-Zend-Framework Action Helpers . - Steve W. Guillaume BABIK wrote: Hi, I've got a script which generate a group of directories from a name file Ex: 12345678.jpg = /1234/5678/ This script can be called from many places in my ZF application I am looking for the best practice to implement this script in my ZF application. Lots of possibilities: - Case I : In a Model file: But my script is not associated to a single model. - Case II : In a static method in a class like My_Function_Library (In order to be simply called by Zend_Loader) - Case III : In a simply PHP file which I includes in my Bootstrap - = Other ideas??? Currently I put theses sort of scripts in statics methods in a class (Case II) But is this the Best Practice? Many thanks, Cheers, PS: HAPPY NEW YEAR Guillaume BABIK INTERNIM 45, rue Aristide Briand 92300 LEVALLOIS Tel : 01.40.87.11.20 Fax : 01.47.57.38.87 Mobile : 06.80.21.90.29 BLOCKED::http://www.internim.com/ http://www.internim.com -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Best-practice-about-a-usage-tp21314867p21324169.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [fw-general] What do you use to manage your ZF projects?
Anyone using ClockingIT? Looks very similar in functionality to Trac and Mantis. - Steve Jake McGraw wrote: My company uses: Mantis + SVN + svk (for branching) Mantis has a really nice plugin for commits that catches bug and appends the commit to the bug status. - jake On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Robert Castley robert.cast...@macro4.com wrote: Hi, Just curious here. I/we currently use Bugzilla CVS, no formal wiki but I do have a MediaWiki used for somethings. I am looking for a solution that fits all, so the obvious choices are 'Trac' like. My problem is that I need a solution that will support multiple projects. (Trac doesn't score well in this area.) Bugzilla is used by multiple PHP, Java C/C++ products. CVS is used only by PHP developers the 'others' use VSS. MediaWiki is used for 'sparse' documentation. My gripes with the current setup: Bugzilla - v. slow and ugly but it fitted the bill at the time. CVS - I like, no love, CVS but I know that there are better solutions out there but am concerned about migration etc. MediaWiki - Probably too much of an overkill for what we need and it is not that easy to configured, extend etc. I now that the ZF team uses JIRA, Confluence etc but I have a budget of £0/$0 :-) and don't qualify for the OS licenses. So ... I would be interested on the views of others of a 'one hat fits all' solution that can handle multiple projects. The solution needs to offer Issues/Bug tracking and Wiki at a minimum. Integration with SCM not important but if it does it great. I would prefer a PHP based solution but happy to consider others i.e. Ruby, Perl, Java etc. - Robert This email has been scanned for all known viruses by the MessageLabs Email Security Service and the Macro 4 plc internal virus protection system. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/What-do-you-use-to-manage-your-ZF-projects--tp21118310p21151707.html Sent from the Zend Framework mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
