Powermac G4 dual 500MHZ v. G4 single 533MHZ

2008-12-27 Thread jonas ulrich
I have a 533MHZ G4 PowerMac with a 133MHZ bus speed and 3 dimm slots. I also
have a Dual 500MHZ PowerMac G4 with a 100MHZ bus speed and 4 dimm slots. I
want to run one of these with Mac OS 10.4 Server. Which will offer me the
most expandability and speed? Thanks!-Jonas

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Powermac G4 dual 500MHZ v. G4 single 533MHZ

2008-12-27 Thread McGrude

On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 2:15 AM, jonas ulrich jonasulrich3...@gmail.com wrote:
 I have a 533MHZ G4 PowerMac with a 133MHZ bus speed and 3 dimm slots. I also
 have a Dual 500MHZ PowerMac G4 with a 100MHZ bus speed and 4 dimm slots. I
 want to run one of these with Mac OS 10.4 Server. Which will offer me the
 most expandability and speed? Thanks!
 -Jonas

If I assume that the amount of free RAM when either machine is running
the server applications you need is about a quarter to a half a gig,
and I assume some other factors, then I'd say...

If you plan to run many processes on the server the dual cpu G4 is
likely your best bet.

If you plan to run few processes on the server the single cpu G4 will do fine,

 - Mike

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



itunes download problem - OT?

2008-12-27 Thread Marty Levine

I have lost my ability to download - proably  for a while since i do
not download often

I get the following error message

There was a problem downloading Another Christmas Song / Another
Christmas Song - Single of the Week / Stephen Colbert. You do not
have enough access privileges for this operation.
Please check that the connection to the network is active and try again.


This error message occurs on any network.

G4 Powermac
LEOPARD 10.5.5
ITUNES 8.0.2


THANKS - Marty

p.s.  I even tried fixing permissions although I did not expect this
to work from everything I have read here on the list

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Options for Audio In/Out

2008-12-27 Thread insightinmind
My PCI Graphics G4 450oc Yikes! has a flaky Speaker Out plug ...  
works if I get the 1/8 plug to my Altec Lansing amplified speakers,  
inserted just right.

Bugs me ... any way to replace the plug on the mobo?

What are some of the alternatives for simple stereo out ... or simple  
stereo in/out?

Nothing fancy, just the basics.

Have an extra PCI slot and also extra USB ports.

Bill Connelly
artsite: http://mysite.verizon.net/moonstoneartstudio
myspace: http://www.myspace.com/moonstoneartstudio




--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: iTunes download problem - OT?

2008-12-27 Thread Dana Collins

On 12/27/08 11:12 AM, Marty Levine of marty.lev...@gmail.com sent

 
 I have lost my ability to download - proably  for a while since i do
 not download often
 
 I get the following error message
 
 There was a problem downloading Another Christmas Song / Another
 Christmas Song - Single of the Week / Stephen Colbert. You do not
 have enough access privileges for this operation.
 Please check that the connection to the network is active and try again.
 
 
 This error message occurs on any network.

Hello Marty,
How substantive is this problem? For ex., to see how comprehensive or
isolated the problem is, go to, say, VersionTracker and download an app;
anything, to see if you get the same error message or not. If isolated,
perhaps your Mac simply lost its iTunes account authorization(?) or the
iTunes folder needs its read/write privileges refreshed.
Just the first thought. Keep us posted, please.
Best regards,
Dana

 
 G4 Powermac
 LEOPARD 10.5.5
 ITUNES 8.0.2
 
 
 THANKS - Marty
 
 p.s.  I even tried fixing permissions although I did not expect this
 to work from everything I have read here on the list

Righto!



--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



FireWire 800 MDD chimes but won't start up.

2008-12-27 Thread Aaron

My FireWire 800 MDD chimes once when I try to start it, and generally powers 
up, but does nothing else. The monitor stays black, the little light on the 
monitor stays amber, and, if I hold down command-option-P-R or 
command-option-O-F, nothing happens either.

I've tried it over and over again with and without a variety of components and 
cards, all of which work in my Dual 867 MDD. Although both my PRAM batteries 
probably should be replaced (and I'm about to order them), either one will 
start  up the Dual 867, which is the computer I've been using for a week or so.

Any suggestions as to what might be wrong? Power supply? Motherboard? CPU?

 - Aaron

P.S. Please Bcc any response to g3-5-l...@aarons.fastmail.net so that it will 
also show up in my inbox!

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Quicken no more? Need something else,... what?

2008-12-27 Thread Cliff



On Dec 24, 7:38 pm, Jeffrey Engle macgu...@gmail.com wrote:
 I've been using Quicken 2007 for quite some time and now come to find
 out that they're not going to make an update to it. So we're looking
 for something like it that works really well? what do you use? how do
 you like it? Jeff

 Jeff Engle

I'm running Quicken 5 on 10.4.11.
Had some crashing issues but after putting Q on the MenuMaster disable
list
it seems more stable.

Looked at several of the alternative commercial and open source
options suggested on this list.
I don't use on line banking via Q but have developed my own version of
double entry accounting
and a bank of reports to keep track of things (in a modestly obsessive
manner). Alternatives didn't seem
to offer all the reporting options with which I've become familiar and
or require a learning curve
a little too steep to get me over the inertia hump for now.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Classic on OS10 Problem

2008-12-27 Thread Ken

My Reply follows quote. On 27/12/2008 09:45 wmicha...@fuse.net said:  

Yes, I did go into System Preferences and correct where OS9 is located. 
And yes, I did add OS9 drivers to the new SATA drive. The funny thing is 
that if I click on an OS9 app, it loads and runs. It just won't load at 
boot like it used to, and I get this funny message when I shut down. Phase 
of the moon? Wolfbane pollen concentration? Or some other setting? I could 
easily enough add a PATA drive back in; I was trying to completely unload 
the internal controller to speed up the machine per a recommendation from 
another
list.

Check the list of applications in the Startup Items folder
in the OS 9 System Folder that is operational when you 
are in Classic.

Ken

http://mysite.verizon.net/res7gt1w/stackomacs


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: 10.5.6 Update and Time Machine/Capsule

2008-12-27 Thread Dan

At 1:34 PM -0800 12/26/2008, Al wrote:
On Dec 16, 10:08 am, Dan dantear...@gmail.com wrote:
  At 5:23 PM -0500 12/15/2008, Al Poulin wrote:

  Does the update make TM/TC users happier?  Hmmm, maybe it is too early
  for this question.

  Client dropped me an email this morning.  TM, on the Mac he updated
  to 10.5.6, is now telling him his backups are invalid.  I haven't
  looked at it yet...

Dan, did this pan out good or bad?

Bad.  All backups lost.  None of the TM images were recoverable by 
any method we tried.  Apple told us to wipe it out and start over.  A 
few days later it barfed again.  Rinse repeat rebarf.  ...  TM has 
become the butt of the office jokes.  He doesn't really care, to be 
honest, as all thru this we've been using CCC etc - which has never 
failed us.

His 2nd TC just came back from Apple, btw - new HD.

- Dan.
-- 
- Psychoceramic Emeritus; South Jersey, USA, Earth

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: FireWire 800 MDD chimes but won't start up.

2008-12-27 Thread Charles Davis


On Dec 27, 2008, at 11:51 AM, Aaron wrote:


 My FireWire 800 MDD chimes once when I try to start it, and  
 generally powers up, but does nothing else. The monitor stays  
 black, the little light on the monitor stays amber, and, if I hold  
 down command-option-P-R or command-option-O-F, nothing happens either.

When are you getting the keys pressed?

I.E.  Press Power button, CHIME {Key press needs to happen BEFORE the  
end of the CHIME sound}. AND are you holding it long enough? It may  
take 10 or 15 seconds before you see the desired response.

[Also, when you get the Command-opt-P-R to work (Chimes again),  
continue holding the Command-opt-P-R for at LEAST three chimes,  
(more won't kill anything, might just help)]
HTH

Chuck D.

 I've tried it over and over again with and without a variety of  
 components and cards, all of which work in my Dual 867 MDD.  
 Although both my PRAM batteries probably should be replaced (and  
 I'm about to order them), either one will start  up the Dual 867,  
 which is the computer I've been using for a week or so.

 Any suggestions as to what might be wrong? Power supply?  
 Motherboard? CPU?

  - Aaron

 P.S. Please Bcc any response to g3-5-l...@aarons.fastmail.net so  
 that it will also show up in my inbox!


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: itunes download problem - OT?

2008-12-27 Thread Dan

At 11:12 AM -0500 12/27/2008, Marty Levine wrote:
G4 Powermac
LEOPARD 10.5.5
ITUNES 8.0.2

I have lost my ability to download

 From where to where?  Is this something you purchased via the iTunes 
Store?  Or a podcast?  or ?

I get the following error message

There was a problem downloading Another Christmas Song / Another
Christmas Song - Single of the Week / Stephen Colbert. You do not
have enough access privileges for this operation.

Check the console log to see if there is any further information available.

This error message occurs on any network.

No clue what you mean by the above.

- Dan.
-- 
- Psychoceramic Emeritus; South Jersey, USA, Earth

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: FireWire 800 MDD chimes but won't start up.

2008-12-27 Thread Dan

At 8:51 AM -0800 12/27/2008, Aaron wrote:
My FireWire 800 MDD chimes once when I try to start it

So the self-test has succeeded - cpu, buses, etc, are ok.

and generally powers up, but does nothing else. The monitor stays 
black, the little light on the monitor stays amber, and, if I hold 
down command-option-P-R or command-option-O-F, nothing happens 
either.

I've tried it over and over again with and without a variety of 
components and cards, all of which work in my Dual 867 MDD. Although 
both my PRAM batteries probably should be replaced (and I'm about to 
order them), either one will start  up the Dual 867, which is the 
computer I've been using for a week or so.

Any suggestions as to what might be wrong? Power supply? Motherboard? CPU?

Try booting from an OS X DVD.
If that doesn't work, pull the HD interface cable, and retry booting 
from the DVD.

- Dan.
-- 
- Psychoceramic Emeritus; South Jersey, USA, Earth

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Classic on OS10 Problem

2008-12-27 Thread Charles Davis


On Dec 27, 2008, at 12:45 PM, Michael B. in Cincinnati wrote:


 Folks, thanks for your replies.

 Yes, I did go into System Preferences and correct where OS9 is
 located. And
 yes, I did add OS9 drivers to the new SATA drive. The funny thing is
 that if I
 click on an OS9 app, it loads and runs.

You referring to 'Classic' under OSX, or straight OS9?

 It just won't load at boot
 like it used to

Booting which system? OSX, or booting OS9(without OSX running)?


 and I get this funny message when I shut down. Phase of the moon?
 Wolfbane pollen concentration? Or some other setting?

Nah, Murphy's just pulling your chain.  ;-)

 I could easily
 enough
 add a PATA drive back in; I was trying to completely unload the
 internal
 controller to speed up the machine per a recommendation from another
 list.

Should be possible to do, just need to find the right 'incantation'.

 I may yet end up with a faster processor.
 - Mike B. in Cincinnati

 On Dec 26, 9:08 pm, Kris Tilford ktilfo...@cox.net wrote:
 On Dec 26, 2008, at 7:21 PM, Michael B. in Cincinnati wrote:

 Hi, I just installed a PCI SATA card in my DA, and I'm having  
 trouble
 with Classic Mode. I used Carbon Copy Cloner to transfer the old
 system from the PATA drive to the new SATA, and some stuff didn't  
 make
 it. After some software reinstalls, I'm almost back to normal, but I
 keep getting this error message that says that the system can't  
 find a
 good OS9 system file on the startup disk. However, I put OS9 on a
 separate (and first) partition. Intrigueingly, Classic Mode will  
 start
 and run if I start an OS9 app from the OS9 partition. Does anyone  
 have
 any suggestions? Is this a problem? I didn't have it before when  
 I was
 running off the internal PATA controller, but I don't think that
 that's the issue.

 It's not obvious what you're trying to do.

 Did you Add OS 9 drivers to the new SATA HD when you formatted it?
 If not, you're going to need to start over and reformat the SATA HD
 and use the Add OS 9 drivers option.

 I'm not a fan of mixing OS X and OS 9. A good idea would be to place
 OS 9 on it's own dedicated PATA HD, and have OS X (without OS 9
 drivers) on it's own dedicated SATA HD. You can run Classic within OS
 X fine this way, and also boot MacOS 9 fine.

 There probably isn't OS 9 software for the SATA card, so if you boot
 OS 9 you'll probably not be able to access the SATA HD.

Chuck D.


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Powermac G4 dual 500MHZ v. G4 single 533MHZ

2008-12-27 Thread PeterH


On Dec 27, 2008, at 2:15 AM, jonas ulrich wrote:

 I have a 533MHZ G4 PowerMac with a 133MHZ bus speed and 3 dimm  
 slots. I also have a Dual 500MHZ PowerMac G4 with a 100MHZ bus  
 speed and 4 dimm slots. I want to run one of these with Mac OS 10.4  
 Server. Which will offer me the most expandability and speed?

Hands down, the machine with the faster bus.

When Apple redesigned the G4s for the faster bus, they also wanted to  
increase the number of PCI slots, so one of the RAM slots had to go.

The result was the Digital Audio series (which includes the  
Quicksilver series).

The LBA48 property can be added to all of these, anyway, so there  
is no reason to add a PCI ATA card, hence no need for an additional  
PCI slot.

Should you consider a faster processor, and you really should, get  
one which is designed for both 100 and 133 MHz buses.

But, for that money, you could build an Intel-based Hackintosh, which  
could easily out-perform any G4 Mac by 5-to-1.



--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: 10.5.6 Update and Time Machine/Capsule

2008-12-27 Thread insightinmind


On Dec 27, 2008, at 1:04 PM, Dan wrote:


 At 1:34 PM -0800 12/26/2008, Al wrote:
 On Dec 16, 10:08 am, Dan dantear...@gmail.com wrote:
  At 5:23 PM -0500 12/15/2008, Al Poulin wrote:

 Does the update make TM/TC users happier?  Hmmm, maybe it is too  
 early
 for this question.

  Client dropped me an email this morning.  TM, on the Mac he updated
  to 10.5.6, is now telling him his backups are invalid.  I haven't
  looked at it yet...

 Dan, did this pan out good or bad?

 Bad.  All backups lost.  None of the TM images were recoverable by
 any method we tried.  Apple told us to wipe it out and start over.  A
 few days later it barfed again.  Rinse repeat rebarf.  ...  TM has
 become the butt of the office jokes.  He doesn't really care, to be
 honest, as all thru this we've been using CCC etc - which has never
 failed us.

 His 2nd TC just came back from Apple, btw - new HD.

Curious ... when you did your TM backups that later failed, were you  
also multi-tasking? or leaving the OS to backup only?

My QS Dual 1GHz with OS X 10.5.4 is fairly simple now, and I haven't  
had trouble with TM backups. I stop opening / closing folders, or any  
apps I'm under control of, while the process is underway. Also backup  
to an external FW HD formatted with the Extended (Journaled) format.

Also using CCC 3.1.3 which I really like now, too.

Bill Connelly
artsite: http://mysite.verizon.net/moonstoneartstudio
myspace: http://www.myspace.com/moonstoneartstudio




--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: 10.5.6 Update and Time Machine/Capsule

2008-12-27 Thread insightinmind


On Dec 27, 2008, at 1:58 PM, insightinmind wrote:



 On Dec 27, 2008, at 1:04 PM, Dan wrote:


 At 1:34 PM -0800 12/26/2008, Al wrote:
 On Dec 16, 10:08 am, Dan dantear...@gmail.com wrote:
  At 5:23 PM -0500 12/15/2008, Al Poulin wrote:

 Does the update make TM/TC users happier?  Hmmm, maybe it is too
 early
 for this question.

  Client dropped me an email this morning.  TM, on the Mac he  
 updated
  to 10.5.6, is now telling him his backups are invalid.  I haven't
  looked at it yet...

Or is it the Time Capsule part that is causing the issues? like  
trying to do an over the Network CCC backup with a WEP encrypted  
wireless device that fails?

Apple seems to be working on the Airport Manager (name?) a lot .5 .6 ...

Bill Connelly
artsite: http://mysite.verizon.net/moonstoneartstudio
myspace: http://www.myspace.com/moonstoneartstudio




--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: FireWire 800 MDD chimes but won't start up.

2008-12-27 Thread Kris Tilford


On Dec 27, 2008, at 10:51 AM, Aaron wrote:

 My FireWire 800 MDD chimes once when I try to start it, and  
 generally powers up, but does nothing else. The monitor stays black,  
 the little light on the monitor stays amber, and, if I hold down  
 command-option-P-R or command-option-O-F, nothing happens either.

 Any suggestions as to what might be wrong? Power supply?

These symptoms are identical to my G5 when the power supply blew.  
Luckily for me, this was a known defect of certain G5's and covered by  
Apple under a special extended warranty, otherwise it would have been  
an $800+ repair. I found a pinout for the power supply and used a  
multimeter to test the lines. In my case, about half were dead. I'd  
bet a MDD power supply is really expensive if that's the case, you  
might want to see about adapting a PC power supply?

You can find some good info about testing the MDD power supply and a  
pinout diagram, etc. here:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1117298

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: 10.5.6 Update and Time Machine/Capsule

2008-12-27 Thread Kris Tilford

On Dec 27, 2008, at 12:04 PM, Dan wrote:

 Dan, did this pan out good or bad?

 Bad.  All backups lost.  None of the TM images were recoverable by
 any method we tried.  Apple told us to wipe it out and start over.  A
 few days later it barfed again.  Rinse repeat rebarf.  ...  TM has
 become the butt of the office jokes.  He doesn't really care, to be
 honest, as all thru this we've been using CCC etc - which has never
 failed us.

 His 2nd TC just came back from Apple, btw - new HD.

I had my brother returned his Time Capsulte to Apple and the genius  
pressed the reset button and told him it was likely fixed and to  
try again. This was a wasted drive of 140 miles to accomplish  
nothing. When he returned with it, it took 3 hours to get the Wifi  
working, and then the HD was bungled and HOT, HOT, HOT. My experience  
with Time Capsule has been nothing but a pain. The differential  
between expectation and reality is a chasm as wide as Vista. Time  
Capsule is a Black Hole.


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Classic on OS10 Problem

2008-12-27 Thread Kris Tilford

On Dec 27, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Michael B. in Cincinnati wrote:

 The funny thing is that if I click on an OS9 app, it loads and runs.

This isn't funny, this is normal behavior for Classic applications  
under OS X.

 It just won't load at boot like it used to.

I'm still not following you here.

I think you may be saying I'm booted in OS X, but when I click on an  
OS 9 app instead of seeing the OS 9 (Classic) boot process window  
open, I'm having the OS 9 app load and run directly? If this is the  
case, then you've got Classic set up to load automatically on boot and  
not show the boot window. This means that Classic is already running  
with when you click on the OS 9 app. You'd adjust this behavior in  
System PreferencesClassic. You'd need to uncheck the boxes Start  
Classic when you login and Hide Classic when starting under the  
Start/Stop tab.

If you are trying to boot OS 9 directly either by selecting it in  
Startup Disk, using the Option key selection, or holding the 9 key  
at startup, and it's not booting, this could be many things. Booting a  
SATA PCI card HD is dependent upon firmware on the PCI card, not all  
SATA PCI can boot in Macs. The firmware on the card might not support  
OS 9 booting, it may be OS X only? If your OS 9 and OS X are on the  
same partition (I believe yours are cloned together?) then the OS 9  
System can become unblessed and not boot. Older versions of Carbon  
Copy Cloner have a Bless function for blessing the System folder,  
but I'm not sure if the newest CCC has this function? You'll need to  
be sure the OS 9 System is blessed to be bootable.

I think the time of OS 9 and Classic is over. You should look for a  
native OS X program to replace whatever OS 9 programs you're still  
using. OS 9 and Classic are more burden than any PATA HD.

If you're trying to squeeze out performance, I'm very dubious that not  
using the PATA bus will result in any appreciable performance gain?  
For performance, I'd suggest you get two identical SATA HDs and stripe  
them in a RAID 0 set, then backup this set using a single internal or  
external HD (use the PATA bus if necessary, although a Firewire  
external SATA based HD may be cheaper than a large PATA HD?). The  
single backup HD needs to be twice the size of the two RAID set  
individual HDs. To get the full speed advantage of RAID 0 each HD in  
the pair needs its own dedicated bus, you can't place both sharing the  
same bus. RAID 0 can nearly double the HD access speed, but you need  
reliable backup.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: iTunes download problem - OT?

2008-12-27 Thread Stephen Conrad

On 12/27/08, Dana Collins dlcatft...@verizon.net wrote:

 On 12/27/08 11:12 AM, Marty Levine of marty.lev...@gmail.com sent


 I have lost my ability to download - proably  for a while since i do
 not download often

 I get the following error message

 There was a problem downloading Another Christmas Song / Another
 Christmas Song - Single of the Week / Stephen Colbert. You do not
 have enough access privileges for this operation.
 Please check that the connection to the network is active and try again.


 This error message occurs on any network.

 Hello Marty,
 How substantive is this problem? For ex., to see how comprehensive or
 isolated the problem is, go to, say, VersionTracker and download an app;
 anything, to see if you get the same error message or not. If isolated,
 perhaps your Mac simply lost its iTunes account authorization(?) or the
 iTunes folder needs its read/write privileges refreshed.
 Just the first thought. Keep us posted, please.
 Best regards,
 Dana


 G4 Powermac
 LEOPARD 10.5.5
 ITUNES 8.0.2


 THANKS - Marty

 p.s.  I even tried fixing permissions although I did not expect this
 to work from everything I have read here on the list

 Righto!



 



-- 
Steve Conrad
Henrietta, MO 64036

The time has come for mankind to grow up and leave its cradle behind;
to go forth and claim our place in outer space.
   - Capt. Henry Gloval


(\__/)
(='.'=)
()_()
Help Bunny Take Over The World!

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: iTunes download problem - OT?

2008-12-27 Thread Stephen Conrad

OOOPS
My Bad!
Irgnore that post

On 12/27/08, Stephen Conrad khel...@gmail.com wrote:
 On 12/27/08, Dana Collins dlcatft...@verizon.net wrote:

 On 12/27/08 11:12 AM, Marty Levine of marty.lev...@gmail.com sent


 I have lost my ability to download - proably  for a while since i do
 not download often

 I get the following error message

 There was a problem downloading Another Christmas Song / Another
 Christmas Song - Single of the Week / Stephen Colbert. You do not
 have enough access privileges for this operation.
 Please check that the connection to the network is active and try again.


 This error message occurs on any network.

 Hello Marty,
 How substantive is this problem? For ex., to see how comprehensive or
 isolated the problem is, go to, say, VersionTracker and download an app;
 anything, to see if you get the same error message or not. If isolated,
 perhaps your Mac simply lost its iTunes account authorization(?) or the
 iTunes folder needs its read/write privileges refreshed.
 Just the first thought. Keep us posted, please.
 Best regards,
 Dana


 G4 Powermac
 LEOPARD 10.5.5
 ITUNES 8.0.2


 THANKS - Marty

 p.s.  I even tried fixing permissions although I did not expect this
 to work from everything I have read here on the list

 Righto!



 



 --
 Steve Conrad
 Henrietta, MO 64036

 The time has come for mankind to grow up and leave its cradle behind;
 to go forth and claim our place in outer space.
- Capt. Henry Gloval


 (\__/)
 (='.'=)
 ()_()
 Help Bunny Take Over The World!



-- 
Steve Conrad
Henrietta, MO 64036

The time has come for mankind to grow up and leave its cradle behind;
to go forth and claim our place in outer space.
   - Capt. Henry Gloval


(\__/)
(='.'=)
()_()
Help Bunny Take Over The World!

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: 10.5.6 Update and Time Machine/Capsule

2008-12-27 Thread Dan

At 1:58 PM -0500 12/27/2008, insightinmind wrote:
   Bad.  All backups lost.  None of the TM images were recoverable by
  any method we tried.  Apple told us to wipe it out and start over.  A
  few days later it barfed again.  Rinse repeat rebarf.  ...  TM has
  become the butt of the office jokes.  He doesn't really care, to be
  honest, as all thru this we've been using CCC etc - which has never
   failed us.

Curious ... when you did your TM backups that later failed, were you
also multi-tasking? or leaving the OS to backup only?

Tried both ways.

My QS Dual 1GHz with OS X 10.5.4 is fairly simple now, and I haven't 
had trouble with TM backups. I stop opening / closing folders, or any 
apps I'm under control of, while the process is underway.

It really should not matter what else is going on, as the file system 
fully supports multiple readers to a file.  The source is not the 
issue.  The issue is that the TM software is buggy - now and then it 
simply fails to write usable output.  Even if the file data it was 
writing were foo, the file structure it writes should be intact!

- Dan.
-- 
- Psychoceramic Emeritus; South Jersey, USA, Earth

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: 10.5.6 Update and Time Machine/Capsule

2008-12-27 Thread Dan

At 2:22 PM -0500 12/27/2008, insightinmind wrote:
Or is it the Time Capsule part that is causing the issues? like 
trying to do an over the Network CCC backup with a WEP encrypted 
wireless device that fails?

We've had TM fail both to TC wired and wireless, and to directly 
connected external drives.

- Dan.
-- 
- Psychoceramic Emeritus; South Jersey, USA, Earth

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: itunes download problem - OT?

2008-12-27 Thread Ron Romine


On Dec 27, 2008, at 10:12 AM, Marty Levine wrote:


 I have lost my ability to download - proably  for a while since i do
 not download often

 I get the following error message

 There was a problem downloading Another Christmas Song / Another
 Christmas Song - Single of the Week / Stephen Colbert. You do not
 have enough access privileges for this operation.
 Please check that the connection to the network is active and try  
 again.


Try logging out of your iTunes account, then signing back in.

I remember some reports of problems with being automatically logged in
and updating to newer versions of iTunes.


- Ron.
  

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: 10.5.6 Update and Time Machine/Capsule

2008-12-27 Thread Dan

At 1:55 PM -0600 12/27/2008, Kris Tilford wrote:

I had my brother returned his Time Capsulte to Apple and the genius
pressed the reset button and told him it was likely fixed and to
try again. This was a wasted drive of 140 miles

sigh.  We had the same experience with the first TC.  The client took 
it to an Apple Store during lunch and all the guy did was push the 
button.  Got back into the office and found it was a brick.  I hope 
the 140 miles at least had some nice scenery!

...Not to bash the Genius concept, which I'm sure is good for some 
segment of the user population, but I've yet to get a solution from 
any Apple Genius that wasn't already available with a few mins of 
searching with Google or in Apple's TIL.  I guess that's appropriate. 
If they had access to double-secret information to fix things, we'd 
throw a fit.

Time Capsule is a Black Hole.

TM + anything = a Black Hole.  I think TC is a nice NAS solution 
with potential, albeit a pricey one.  IOW, while I don't recommend 
Time Machine for anything except playing around, I have (sigh. I'm 
not sure why!) hopes for Time Capsule.

I'm still in the market for a good cost-reasonable shared storage 
solution.  At this point, we're mostly using things like Power Macs 
or Mac Minis armed with strings of external Firewire or eSATA drives.

Our luck with off-the-shelf NAS boxes hasn't been very good... HD 
mechanism problems, whole boxes that emulate bricks suddenly, etc.

For backups... I've created a two-layered solution.  Step 1:  The mac 
pushes the data with CCC to the backup volume (either local or on a 
server-Mac).  Step 2:  Critical folders are pushed to DVD.  Not 
elegant, but it works, if the client remembers to put DVD blanks into 
the drives and/or plug in the externals.

- Dan.
-- 
- Psychoceramic Emeritus; South Jersey, USA, Earth

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: 10.5.6 Update and Time Machine/Capsule

2008-12-27 Thread Jeffrey Engle


On Dec 27, 2008, at 1:50 PM, Dan wrote:


 At 1:58 PM -0500 12/27/2008, insightinmind wrote:
 Bad.  All backups lost.  None of the TM images were recoverable by
 any method we tried.  Apple told us to wipe it out and start  
 over.  A
 few days later it barfed again.  Rinse repeat rebarf.  ...  TM has
 become the butt of the office jokes.  He doesn't really care, to be
 honest, as all thru this we've been using CCC etc - which has never
 failed us.

I had this same problem with my new macbook, and a time machine volume  
attached to my AE base station Gave me such fits, that I dropped  
the TM thing all together for now and went back to 10.5.5.

Jeff Engle
Kamiah, Idaho 83536

208-935-0992
eBay ID: Bluebedheads w/290+ pos. feedback


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Classic on OS10 Problem

2008-12-27 Thread Michael B. in Cincinnati

To answer several questions:

I bought this machine basically to learn about Macs. I also own and
use Linux
and (unfortunately, due to my job) Windows machines. My interest in
OS9 is
basically self-educational, not utilitarian. although I like the
system. I also
installed a decent sound card (m-Audio 2496), and plan to use it for a
music
workstation; I have lots of older open-reel tapes that I would like to
convert
to digital, edit to improve the lost high frequencies, and record to
CD's.

In my original installation, I had an 80GB PATA HD containing 10.4.11,
and a second
250 GB PATA HD with two partitions, one containing OS9, and the other
for file
storage from 10.4. I used one of the hacks reported in these pages
to gain
48-bit addressing, and that worked fine. When I booted 10.4, Classic
would also
boot; I could watch OS9 load during the boot process. The OS9 icon
would bounce/flash
until the load was completed. Then, I could click on an OS9 app icon,
and it would load
immediately. I have some old OS9 software, which I admit are  mostly
curiosities,
but they run better on this machine by far than on my G3 iMac.

So I installed the SATA card (an Acard AEC-6290M from OWC) with a 160
GB SATA
drive with two partitions, the first of which I installed OS9 onto,
and the second 10.4.
I put the 250 GB PATA drive into an OWC Neptune case, and used that
with CCC
to transfer the 10.4 install onto the 160 GB's second partition. I
then reinstalled
OS9 and the apps onto the first partition, because I was beginning to
have this
error message while it was still running on the PATA drive, and went
from there.
Afterward, I started having this odd error message about not having a
good system
file on the startup disk whenever I shut the machine down (it won't
sleep because
of the USB 2.0 card).

So, to be very specific, this is a DA with dual 533 MHz processors,
1.5 GB of
RAM, a flashed GeForce 6200 video card (which has been great), a DVD-
RAM,
10.4.11, and the above mentioned HD's. It also has a USB 2.0 card and
a
Sweet Multiport, for what that's worth. Overall, it's a nice system,
and one I've
enjoyed. I may yet, again for self-educational purposes, install an
aftermarket
processor. I certainly can't justify it in terms of bang for the buck;
it would have
been cheaper from the get-go to find a dual 1.8 GHz G5 to start with.
But I'm
having fun, and that's the issue.

I would prefer for the system to behave like it used to, with OS9
kicking in at
boot and remaining ready to go. I'm trying to understand why it's
behaving
the way it is. No, it's not life-threatening; but enquiring minds want
to know!

Thanks for all your input. For the benefit of others, I'll report back
on my
findings.

- Michael B. in Cincinnati

On Dec 27, 4:32 pm, Kris Tilford ktilfo...@cox.net wrote:
 On Dec 27, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Michael B. in Cincinnati wrote:

  The funny thing is that if I click on an OS9 app, it loads and runs.

 This isn't funny, this is normal behavior for Classic applications  
 under OS X.

  It just won't load at boot like it used to.

 I'm still not following you here.

 I think you may be saying I'm booted in OS X, but when I click on an  
 OS 9 app instead of seeing the OS 9 (Classic) boot process window  
 open, I'm having the OS 9 app load and run directly? If this is the  
 case, then you've got Classic set up to load automatically on boot and  
 not show the boot window. This means that Classic is already running  
 with when you click on the OS 9 app. You'd adjust this behavior in  
 System PreferencesClassic. You'd need to uncheck the boxes Start  
 Classic when you login and Hide Classic when starting under the  
 Start/Stop tab.

 If you are trying to boot OS 9 directly either by selecting it in  
 Startup Disk, using the Option key selection, or holding the 9 key  
 at startup, and it's not booting, this could be many things. Booting a  
 SATA PCI card HD is dependent upon firmware on the PCI card, not all  
 SATA PCI can boot in Macs. The firmware on the card might not support  
 OS 9 booting, it may be OS X only? If your OS 9 and OS X are on the  
 same partition (I believe yours are cloned together?) then the OS 9  
 System can become unblessed and not boot. Older versions of Carbon  
 Copy Cloner have a Bless function for blessing the System folder,  
 but I'm not sure if the newest CCC has this function? You'll need to  
 be sure the OS 9 System is blessed to be bootable.

 I think the time of OS 9 and Classic is over. You should look for a  
 native OS X program to replace whatever OS 9 programs you're still  
 using. OS 9 and Classic are more burden than any PATA HD.

 If you're trying to squeeze out performance, I'm very dubious that not  
 using the PATA bus will result in any appreciable performance gain?  
 For performance, I'd suggest you get two identical SATA HDs and stripe  
 them in a RAID 0 set, then backup this set using a single internal or  
 external HD (use the PATA bus if necessary, 

Test

2008-12-27 Thread Jonas Lopez

Test post to G3-5 list.


  

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Options for Audio In/Out

2008-12-27 Thread Wallace Adrian D'Alessio

On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 11:28 AM, insightinmind
billycarm...@verizon.net wrote:
 My PCI Graphics G4 450oc Yikes! has a flaky Speaker Out plug ... works if I
 get the 1/8 plug to my Altec Lansing amplified speakers, inserted just
 right.
 Bugs me ... any way to replace the plug on the mobo?
 What are some of the alternatives for simple stereo out ... or simple stereo
 in/out?
 Nothing fancy, just the basics.
 Have an extra PCI slot and also extra USB ports.

 Bill Connelly
 artsite: http://mysite.verizon.net/moonstoneartstudio
 myspace: http://www.myspace.com/moonstoneartstudio



 --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~


Can you solder a new one on? Finding a replacement may be iffy.

Or just get a sound card from the swap list?

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Quicken no more? Need something else,... what?

2008-12-27 Thread Dan A. Currie

Cliff wrote:

 On Dec 24, 7:38 pm, Jeffrey Engle macgu...@gmail.com wrote:
   
 I've been using Quicken 2007 for quite some time and now come to find
 out that they're not going to make an update to it. So we're looking
 for something like it that works really well? what do you use? how do
 you like it? Jeff

 Jeff Engle
 

 I'm running Quicken 5 on 10.4.11.
 Had some crashing issues but after putting Q on the MenuMaster disable
 list
 it seems more stable.
   
Have you tried this site?

http://fi.intuit.com/support/hot_topics/

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: 10.5.6 Update and Time Machine/Capsule

2008-12-27 Thread Charles Davis


On Dec 27, 2008, at 6:22 PM, Jeffrey Engle wrote:



 On Dec 27, 2008, at 1:50 PM, Dan wrote:


 At 1:58 PM -0500 12/27/2008, insightinmind wrote:
 Bad.  All backups lost.  None of the TM images were recoverable by
 any method we tried.  Apple told us to wipe it out and start
 over.  A
 few days later it barfed again.  Rinse repeat rebarf.  ...  TM has
 become the butt of the office jokes.  He doesn't really care, to be
 honest, as all thru this we've been using CCC etc - which has never
 failed us.

 I had this same problem with my new macbook, and a time machine volume
 attached to my AE base station Gave me such fits, that I dropped
 the TM thing all together for now and went back to 10.5.5.

 Jeff Engle


Jeff:
I was under the impression that 'Time Machine' was an application  
available under OSX.
Are you trying to say that if you have 10.5.6 -- Time machine MUST be  
used??

Chuck D.


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: Classic on OS10 Problem

2008-12-27 Thread Charles Davis


On Dec 27, 2008, at 8:28 PM, Michael B. in Cincinnati wrote:


 To answer several questions:

 I bought this machine basically to learn about Macs. I also own and
 use Linux
 and (unfortunately, due to my job) Windows machines. My interest in
 OS9 is
 basically self-educational, not utilitarian. although I like the
 system. I also
 installed a decent sound card (m-Audio 2496), and plan to use it for a
 music
 workstation; I have lots of older open-reel tapes that I would like to
 convert
 to digital, edit to improve the lost high frequencies, and record to
 CD's.

 In my original installation, I had an 80GB PATA HD containing 10.4.11,
 and a second
 250 GB PATA HD with two partitions, one containing OS9, and the other
 for file
 storage from 10.4. I used one of the hacks reported in these pages
 to gain
 48-bit addressing, and that worked fine. When I booted 10.4, Classic
 would also
 boot; I could watch OS9 load during the boot process. The OS9 icon
 would bounce/flash
 until the load was completed. Then, I could click on an OS9 app icon,
 and it would load
 immediately. I have some old OS9 software, which I admit are  mostly
 curiosities,
 but they run better on this machine by far than on my G3 iMac.

 So I installed the SATA card (an Acard AEC-6290M from OWC) with a 160
 GB SATA
 drive with two partitions, the first of which I installed OS9 onto,
 and the second 10.4.
 I put the 250 GB PATA drive into an OWC Neptune case, and used that
 with CCC
 to transfer the 10.4 install onto the 160 GB's second partition. I
 then reinstalled
 OS9 and the apps onto the first partition, because I was beginning to
 have this
 error message while it was still running on the PATA drive, and went
 from there.
 Afterward, I started having this odd error message about not having a
 good system
 file on the startup disk whenever I shut the machine down (it won't
 sleep because
 of the USB 2.0 card).

 So, to be very specific, this is a DA with dual 533 MHz processors,
 1.5 GB of
 RAM, a flashed GeForce 6200 video card (which has been great), a DVD-
 RAM,
 10.4.11, and the above mentioned HD's. It also has a USB 2.0 card and
 a
 Sweet Multiport, for what that's worth. Overall, it's a nice system,
 and one I've
 enjoyed. I may yet, again for self-educational purposes, install an
 aftermarket
 processor. I certainly can't justify it in terms of bang for the buck;
 it would have
 been cheaper from the get-go to find a dual 1.8 GHz G5 to start with.
 But I'm
 having fun, and that's the issue.

 I would prefer for the system to behave like it used to, with OS9
 kicking in at
 boot and remaining ready to go.

That SHOULD be a simple thing to fix

Goto 'System Preference/System/Classic, and there is a box to check  
to have OS9 load at startup.

 I'm trying to understand why it's
 behaving
 the way it is. No, it's not life-threatening; but enquiring minds want
 to know!

 Thanks for all your input. For the benefit of others, I'll report back
 on my
 findings.

 - Michael B. in Cincinnati


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: UPS effectiveness (was: Power failure-computer won't start)

2008-12-27 Thread w_tom

On Dec 27, 10:55 pm, Bill Christensen billc_li...@greenbuilder.com
wrote:
 Finally I decided that the prime difference was the power.  They were
 unprotected.  We've got a big UPS (sine wave output, not square
 wave).  We're all way out at the end of the power system, and the
 power is definitely prone to spikes and surges.   Our UPS  beeps and
 boops frequently telling us of slumps and surges.
 We put them on a UPS and the problems went away.  Same machine, same
 use patterns.

  Let's add some facts.  First you had no idea why the supply was
failing.  Using anecdotal evidence, you were speculating.  From
diagnostic programs, where was a fact that identified what hardware
was defective?  You fixed what?  And then it still failed?  You did
not even know what hardware was defective and when.  So how do you
know the UPS terminated hardware damage?  You don't.  You only
speculated.

  Second, anything that a $500 UPS (to create sine waves) would solve
is supposed to be inside a $60 power supply.  So you spent $500 on a
UPS to fix a defective power supply?  That is proof?  Of what?  You
somehow _know_ 'dirty' power can corrupt any computer?  And that
corruption means hardware was damaged?

  Above are numerous assumptions based only on observation and on few
facts.

   When was observation alone sufficient to know something?  Any fact
from only observation is classic junk science.  What was taught in
junior high science?  First, the problem must be defined by a
hypothesis based in well understood principles.  Second, hypothesis
must be confirmed with experimental evidence.  Without both, only
speculation exists.  You have posted speculation.  Then you converted
that speculation into a conclusion.  IOW junk science.

   More likely, you spent $500 to cure symptoms.  A power supply was
defective even when used in your home.  If using basic principles
taught in junior high school, then all that trouble and a $500 UPS
would have been unnecessary.

  Plug-in UPSes have their purpose as I stated.  I then stated what
those purposes are.   But to fix a $60 defective computer power supply
with a $500 UPS - that is not worthwhile.  That $500 UPS only suggests
where to look for the defect in a computer's power supply 'system'.

   Anne Keller-Smith recommends using a UPS to protect hardware.  Even
a $500 UPS does not claim protection from typical hardware destructive
events. Even your example was not a hardware destructive event.  Her
recommendation was not a $500 UPS.  A computer grade UPS is typically
under $100.  That UPS connects a computer directly to AC mains as if
the UPS did not exist.  And then you complicate the issue by
discussing a $500 UPS?  So many defects and assumptions exist in your
reasoning.   So again, why would you buy a $500 UPS to fix a defective
$60 power supply - then assume that solved a hardware failure?

  A UPS is to protect data from power loss.  Even 'dirtiest'
electricity created by the typical computer grade UPS is made
irrelevant by the computer's power supply.   Nothing posted implies a
$500 UPS protected hardware.  It only implies a $500 UPS was purchased
to fix a defective $60 power supply.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



Re: 10.5.6 Update and Time Machine/Capsule

2008-12-27 Thread Jeffrey Engle


On Dec 27, 2008, at 8:36 PM, Charles Davis wrote:



 On Dec 27, 2008, at 6:22 PM, Jeffrey Engle wrote:



 On Dec 27, 2008, at 1:50 PM, Dan wrote:


 At 1:58 PM -0500 12/27/2008, insightinmind wrote:
 Bad.  All backups lost.  None of the TM images were recoverable by
 any method we tried.  Apple told us to wipe it out and start
 over.  A
 few days later it barfed again.  Rinse repeat rebarf.  ...  TM has
 become the butt of the office jokes.  He doesn't really care, to  
 be
 honest, as all thru this we've been using CCC etc - which has  
 never
 failed us.

 I had this same problem with my new macbook, and a time machine  
 volume
 attached to my AE base station Gave me such fits, that I dropped
 the TM thing all together for now and went back to 10.5.5.

 Jeff Engle


 Jeff:
 I was under the impression that 'Time Machine' was an application
 available under OSX.
 Are you trying to say that if you have 10.5.6 -- Time machine MUST be
 used??

 Chuck D.




Time Machine is software A time machine volume is simply the hard  
disk in use by time machine. And no, time machine is merely an option  
like anything else. I just was having problems with time machine (the  
software that is) after I updated to 10.5.6  Hope that helps, J

Jeff Engle
Kamiah, Idaho 83536

208-935-0992
eBay ID: Bluebedheads w/290+ pos. feedback


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed Low End Mac's G3-5 List, a 
group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on 
Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
g3-5-list-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list?hl=en
Low End Mac RSS feed at feed://lowendmac.com/feed.xml
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---