In the Market for a G5, maybe ...

2012-12-17 Thread Bill Connelly
A friend suggested I upgrade to a G5 tower, after my G4 QS 2002's cpu  
went bad ...


I'm doing mostly involved photography processing in the HDR area  
now ... so speed is a good thing.


All my applications are 32bit style coding ... will I run into any  
problems with G5s in general?


What about the cooling systems ... didn't some of them have problems  
with the liquid cooling idea?


I have a number of PCI cards that are still good ... what ideas do you  
have here? I may just wait for a QS Dual 1GHz cpu to appear, and  
consider going with an MDD for increase in speed in the future.


Suggestions on which ones in the G5 family (and others) to consider  
are welcomed. Not too fat in the wallet ...


--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: In the Market for a G5, maybe ...

2012-12-17 Thread Cameron Kaiser
> I'm doing mostly involved photography processing in the HDR area  
> now ... so speed is a good thing.
> 
> All my applications are 32bit style coding ... will I run into any  
> problems with G5s in general?

No. I even compile TenFourFox in 32-bit mode for G5s because it has Carbon
dependencies.

> What about the cooling systems ... didn't some of them have problems  
> with the liquid cooling idea?
> 
> I have a number of PCI cards that are still good ... what ideas do you  
> have here? I may just wait for a QS Dual 1GHz cpu to appear, and  
> consider going with an MDD for increase in speed in the future.
> 
> Suggestions on which ones in the G5 family (and others) to consider  
> are welcomed. Not too fat in the wallet ...

G5s as a whole can be cantankerous and difficult to repair, but well treated
they can last for a long time. It helps to buy the right one, though.

Personally, I believe the only two worth owning are the dual 2.3, because it
is the fastest air-cooled G5, or the quad 2.5, because it is the fastest
Power Mac ever and its liquid cooling system is more reliable than previous
machines. G5s slower than this are not significantly faster than the G4s they
replaced and have more headaches, and the other G5s have various higher
than average component failure rates (usually power supply or LCS).

In your case, you may need to consider the dual 2.7 because it will still
accept your PCI cards; the quad 2.5 will only handle PCIe. However, the dual
2.7 is actually not as fast as the quad (not only cores, but bigger caches),
and it has a higher LCS failure rate.

I own a quad, and it is a solid machine (and has been for over six years),
but it is power hungry and can be noisy. Still, it runs my Power Mac apps
like nothing else, and my legacy hardware was all external, so the PCIe slots
are now filled with extension cards instead. And interestingly my MDD has
failed more times than the G5 (the MDD has blown through two power supplies
in its lifetime, while the G5 has never needed any significant maintenance
other than cleaning). But the MDD will be cheaper to buy, a bit quieter and
less expensive to run and maintain, so given that you have a need to keep
your old PCI cards, an MDD may actually be a better option for you if you
don't need the "fastest Mac ever."

-- 
 personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ --
  Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckai...@floodgap.com
-- FORTUNE: Today is an excellent day to have a totally rotten day. ---

-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: Throwing in the Towel – CPU Upgrades

2012-12-17 Thread Mac User #330250
--  Original message  --
Subject: Re: Throwing in the Towel
Date:Sunday, 16. December 2012
From:Alex Sciorino 
To:  g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
> I just checked my favourite online auction site and I don't see any dual
> 1ghz. The best I can find is single 867. Have you considered a Sonnet
> upgrade? You can get the single core 1ghz for about $40.

There are single core upgrades up to 1.8 GHz around. Up to 1.6 GHz it may be
bought at a reasonable price…

Search for Sonnet, OWC (Other World Computing), Giga Designs, Newer
Technology, PowerLogix, XLR8 and FastMac.

http://lowendmac.com/ppc/g4upgrades.html

It doesn’t always have to be Sonnet. I have an OWC upgrade at home, a Mercury
Xtreme G4 1.4 GHz Processor Upgrade (OWCME41400L2D), like this:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/OWC-Mercury-Xtreme-1-4GHz-Apple-G4-Desktop-Upgrade-/261133816357

(that’s not my eBay auction, I just want to make the point that it may still
be available)

IMO Dual processor upgrade cards are in no way worth the current market
prices, like this one:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Sonnet-Technologies-PowerPC-G4-1-8-GHz-SG4D-1800L-Processor-/150920002639

BUT, original Dual-1 GHz processor modules are also available, like this one:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Power-Mac-G4-1-0GHz-Dual-Processor-Module-661-2730-820-1310-A-3967-/160940346106

Cheers,
Andreas  aka  Mac User #330250

-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: Throwing in the Towel – CPU Upgrades

2012-12-17 Thread peterhaas

Just remember that the fastest G4 which was produced by IBM and/or Moto
(Freescale) was 1.42 GHz, and the so-called 1.5 GHz (to accommodate the
100 MHz bus case), and 1.6 GHz, ..., 2.0 GHz G4s are really 1.42 GHz chips
which have been purchased in bulk and then "die sorted" by the
manufacturer, usually with an extensive "burn in" process to confirm
operations (usually Photoshop, etcetera) with a higher-than-specification
clock speed.

IMO, Giga-Designs are the best of the "supercharged" dual core
replacements as they figured out how to layout a dual core processor card
which could be used in BOTH 100 MHz bus AND 133 MHz bus models (the
sockets are actually the same, but the orientation is quite different.

> There are single core upgrades up to 1.8 GHz around. Up to 1.6 GHz it may
> be
> bought at a reasonable price…
>
> Search for Sonnet, OWC (Other World Computing), Giga Designs, Newer
> Technology, PowerLogix, XLR8 and FastMac.
>
> http://lowendmac.com/ppc/g4upgrades.html
>
> It doesn’t always have to be Sonnet. I have an OWC upgrade at home, a
> Mercury
> Xtreme G4 1.4 GHz Processor Upgrade (OWCME41400L2D), like this:


-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: Throwing in the Towel

2012-12-17 Thread t...@prismnet.com


On Saturday, December 15, 2012 2:00:37 PM UTC-6, pdimage wrote:
>
> On 15/12/2012 16:32, "Richard Gerome" > 
> wrote: 
>
> > So this left me 
> > wondering why so many put this 9800 in them??? Maybe someone here can 
> tell me 
> > why they even use this 9800 card? When I go back to NC to visit them I'm 
> going 
> > to download Leopard on it for them... 
>
> It's because the 9800 pro was just about the fastest 4x agp card you 
> could get for a G4 - and the easiest to convert from pc to mac with little 
> or no problems and get all the ports working fully. 
>


I think the ATI Fire GL X3 256mb AGP was faster.  It may not be easier to 
convert.  However, if you get the HP version, ATI Fire GL X3. then reports 
are that both DVI ports work fully as expected.  There are problems with 
getting both ports working if one gets a regular X800 XT.

The ATI Fire GL X3 is available on Ebay for less than $50.  Back in April 
they were going for as low as $25 each.

Jeff Walther

-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: In the Market for a G5, maybe ...

2012-12-17 Thread JohnCarmonne

On Dec 17, 2012, at 6:28 AM, Cameron Kaiser wrote:
> 
>> What about the cooling systems ... didn't some of them have problems  
>> with the liquid cooling idea?
>> 
>> I have a number of PCI cards that are still good ... what ideas do you  
>> have here? I may just wait for a QS Dual 1GHz cpu to appear, and  
>> consider going with an MDD for increase in speed in the future.
>> 
>> Suggestions on which ones in the G5 family (and others) to consider  
>> are welcomed. Not too fat in the wallet ...
> 
> G5s as a whole can be cantankerous and difficult to repair, but well treated
> they can last for a long time. It helps to buy the right one, though.
> 
> 
> 
> In your case, you may need to consider the dual 2.7 because it will still
> accept your PCI cards; the quad 2.5 will only handle PCIe. However, the dual
> 2.7 is actually not as fast as the quad (not only cores, but bigger caches),
> and it has a higher LCS failure rate.

My Dual 2.7 is a very reliable machine since I installed a Panasonic LCS three 
years ago, I had to repair the stock Delphi twice.


John Carmonne
Yorba Linda CA
92886 USA
MacPro 2.66 Quad Nehalem






-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: Throwing in the Towel

2012-12-17 Thread David
 The ATI FireGL X3 is a great card for the G5 PowerMac, but I am not so sure it 
is a good choice for the G4.  Also, only certain  models can be converted for 
use in a Mac, and I can guarantee you that 80%, or more of those cheap $25 to 
$50 FireGL X3's for sale on eBay are NOT the ones that can be successfully 
converted.  I got lucky, but then had extensive discussions with an expert who 
converted mine and sells them on his website, so buyer beware!  That cheap 
FireGL X3 you get from eBay might not be able to be converted for use in any 
Mac, unless you are lucky.

  I think the ATI Fire GL X3 256mb AGP was faster.  It may not be easier to 
convert.  However, if you get the HP version, ATI Fire GL X3. then reports are 
that both DVI ports work fully as expected.  There are problems with getting 
both ports working if one gets a regular X800 XT.

  The ATI Fire GL X3 is available on Ebay for less than $50.  Back in April 
they were going for as low as $25 each.

  Jeff Walther

-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Jpeg thumbnails auto creation

2012-12-17 Thread geraldcornish

Hi all,

Does anyone know what might create thumbnails automatically on  
digital camera jpegs when the card is opened in OS 10.4.11 Tiger?


Our Quicksilver G4 (2002) has been automatically creating jpeg  
thumbnails in the camera card for about a year until we had the  
startup disk crash. After creating a new startup disk from an  
outdated clone this no longer happens.


I guess I have installed something last year that gave this useful  
ability but I cannot think what it may be! I wondered if it was  
iPhoto but re-installing iLife made no difference.


Any help would be appreciated.

TIA

--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Jpeg thumbnails auto creation

2012-12-17 Thread geraldcornish
Having spent a little time searching the web I realise I mean  
Previews not Thumbnails, IE the normal Jpeg logo on the photo should  
change to show a preview of the photo.


Sorry for the mislead.


From: geraldcornish 
Date: 17 Dec 2012 21:05:16 GMT
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Jpeg thumbnails auto creation

Hi all,

Does anyone know what might create thumbnails automatically on  
digital camera jpegs when the card is opened in OS 10.4.11 Tiger?


Our Quicksilver G4 (2002) has been automatically creating jpeg  
thumbnails in the camera card for about a year until we had the  
startup disk crash. After creating a new startup disk from an  
outdated clone this no longer happens.


I guess I have installed something last year that gave this useful  
ability but I cannot think what it may be! I wondered if it was  
iPhoto but re-installing iLife made no difference.


Any help would be appreciated.

TIA


--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: Jpeg thumbnails auto creation

2012-12-17 Thread Guy Plunkett III
Title: Re: Jpeg thumbnails auto
creation


It has been a while, but I vaguely recall an Applescript that
came with a version of GraphicConverter which did that.

Guy


On 12/17/12, geraldcornish wrote:
Hi
all,

Does anyone know
what might create thumbnails automatically on digital camera jpegs
when the card is opened in OS 10.4.11 Tiger?

Our Quicksilver G4
(2002) has been automatically creating jpeg thumbnails in the camera
card for about a year until we had the startup disk crash. After
creating a new startup disk from an outdated clone this no longer
happens.

I guess I have
installed something last year that gave this useful ability but I
cannot think what it may be! I wondered if it was iPhoto but
re-installing iLife made no difference.

Any help would be
appreciated.

TIA






-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list


Re: In the Market for a G5, maybe ...

2012-12-17 Thread Valter Prahlad
Il giorno 17/12/12 13:24, Bill Connelly ha scritto:

> A friend suggested I upgrade to a G5 tower, after my G4 QS 2002's cpu
> went bad ...

> Suggestions on which ones in the G5 family (and others) to consider
> are welcomed. Not too fat in the wallet ...

I'm currently using a G5 DP 2.7 GHz, I got it used 1,5 years ago.
Great machine: fast, very silent (liquid cooled), easy to access its
innards, very stable (I'm using it with OSX Tiger).
Its only drawback, so far, it's power hungry: it draws from 160 Watts (idle)
to over 300 Watts!

It's way faster than the G4 Digital Audio (originally 667 MHz, upgraded with
a 1.4 GHz CPU) that I had before. A big step forward.
If your QS felt slow, I suggest going for a G5 (2.0 GHz or above): you won't
need to change your software (no OS9 boot, though!), but it will be
snappier.
Depending on where you are, I think G5s start from 100-150$ and up.
Definitely worth a check.

Regarding realiability, I read G5s with Delphi liquid cooling are
troublesome, but mine has a Delphi one, and so far - knock on wood! - it
runs flawlessly.
I think it's a matter of luck. If you don't feel like gambling ;-) better go
with an air-cooled one (the 2.3 GHz DP seems the best choice).

Here you can find info and specs about all the G5 models:
http://www.everymac.com/systems/apple/powermac_g5/index-powermac-g5.html


-- 
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for 
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml and our netiquette 
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to this group, send email to g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/g3-5-list