Re: [Ada] GCC 4.1 Status Report (2006-01-15)

[John David Anglin]

 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-01/msg00833.html
 hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 has some cxg problems, but I don't
 know if 4.0 worked at all there.

A testsuite run with ada for 4.0.3 is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-01/msg00893.html.
The run terminated before completing.  I've added the test
that caused the failure to my norun list.  A PR is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2006-01/msg01655.html.

Dave
-- 
J. David Anglin  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
National Research Council of Canada  (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6602)

Re: [Ada] GCC 4.1 Status Report (2006-01-15)

[Laurent GUERBY]

On the Ada side for 4.1:

- x86-linux is fine, 0 ACATS FAIL on i686 and i486
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-01/msg00632.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-01/msg00148.html

- powerpc-darwin doesn't bootstrap = PR 22533, regression from 4.0),
Richard, Eric, Andrew, do you have a status for powerpc-darwin on 4.1?

- three ACATS wrong-code on amd64-linux = PR 20548, regression from 4.0
but it looks like we were lucky before so might not count as a
regression. Note this one affects some other platforms too and some
don't see those FAIL at all on amd64:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-01/msg00834.html

On other platforms:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-01/msg00830.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-01/msg00633.html
powerpc-linux is in good shape.

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-01/msg00833.html
hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 has some cxg problems, but I don't
know if 4.0 worked at all there.

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-01/msg00816.html
ia64-linux looks fine (Andreas, could you send me the compressed log,
c36204d FAIL is not filed in bugzilla yet).

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-01/msg00631.html
s390-ibm-linux-gnu is in good shape (ce3810b is PR 20753 and is also
present on other platforms)

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-01/msg00663.html
s390x-ibm-linux-gnu (Ulrich, cdd2a01 is unfiled, could you send
me the compressed log).

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-01/msg00606.html
hppa-linux is in good shape.

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-01/msg00635.html
sparc-linux is in good shape.

No 4.1 test result for alpha-linux in january, even for C which has only
4.0 and 4.2 test results. Is there a build problem on this platform?

Laurent

On Sun, 2006-01-15 at 18:58 -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
 The release of GCC 4.1 was scheduled for January 18th.  Given the fact
 that I've not yet built release candidates, that date is not achievable.
 
 We have 63 regressions open against GCC 4.1, but only six are P1.  Since
 P1s are showstoppers, that means we're not yet ready to start building
 release candidates -- but we're close.  (I'm presently testing a fix for
 one of the PR22136, which is one of the P1 problems.)
 
 In any case, once the P1s are resolved, the branch will be frozen and I
 will create the GCC 4.1.0 RC1.  Then, all going well, we'll have GCC
 4.1.0 within about a week of RC1; if there are problems reported for
 RC1, then we'll iterate.
 
 Therefore, if there are other regressions which you would like to see
 fixed for 4.1, now is the time!
 

Re: [Ada] GCC 4.1 Status Report (2006-01-15)

[Eric Botcazou]

 - powerpc-darwin doesn't bootstrap = PR 22533, regression from 4.0),
 Richard, Eric, Andrew, do you have a status for powerpc-darwin on 4.1?

PR 22533 is presumably fixed now.  powerpc-darwin may or may not bootstrap 
Ada, but it looks like a target problem if it doesn't.

 - three ACATS wrong-code on amd64-linux = PR 20548, regression from 4.0
 but it looks like we were lucky before so might not count as a
 regression.

Not quite, these are regressions from 4.0 in the sense that they were robustly 
passing with 4.0 but don't pass anymore with 4.1 because of changes in the 
way the compiler detects stack overflows.  They now need to be compiled with 
-fstack-check to pass on 64-bit platforms; but they would actually not pass 
even with -fstack-check, because -fstack-check doesn't really work in 4.x.  
We plan to contribute a new implementation of -fstack-check in the future.

 Note this one affects some other platforms too and some 
 don't see those FAIL at all on amd64:
 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-01/msg00834.html

Yes, the testsuite is clean on my AMD64 box too.  I guess it depends on the 
kernel and SuSE kernels play nice here.

 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-01/msg00635.html
 sparc-linux is in good shape.

SPARC/Solaris too:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-01/msg00504.html

SPARC is still the only platform where ce3810b fails, but the problem is 
generic and has long been latent in the runtime.

Thanks for all your Ada-related work!

-- 
Eric Botcazou