[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-dhc-v6only-06

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team 
(Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF 
Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

Document: draft-ietf-dhc-v6only-06
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 09 August 2020
IETF LC End Date: 02 July 2020
IESG Telechat Date:

Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as standards track RFC

Major Issues: None

Minor Issues: None


Thanks,

Wassim H.

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-14

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team 
(Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF 
Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at: 
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq

Document: draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-14
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 03 January 2020
IETF LC End Date: 19 December 2019 


Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as BCP 

- Major Issues: None

- Minor Issues: None



Regards,

Wassim H.

 



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios-08

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team 
(Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF 
Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at: 
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq

Document: draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios-08
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 18 September 2019
IETF LC End Date: 13 September 2019 


Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as Informational RFC 

- Major Issues: None

- Minor Issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.

 



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-conditional-ras-05

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team 
(Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF 
Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at: 
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq

Document: draft-ietf-v6ops-conditional-ras-05
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 05 July 2018
IETF LC End Date: 21 May 2018 
IESG Telechat Date: 02 August 2018

Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as Informational RFC 

- Major Issues: None

- Minor Issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-conditional-ras-04

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team 
(Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF 
Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at: 
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq


Document: draft-ietf-v6ops-conditional-ras-04
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 21 May 2018
IETF LC End Date: 21 May 2018 
IESG Telechat Date: Unknown

Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as Informational RFC 

- Major Issues: None

- Minor Issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-13

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team 
(Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF 
Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at: 
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq


Document: draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-13
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 24 October 2017
IETF LC End Date: 06 October 2017 
IESG Telechat Date: 26 October 2017

Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as proposed RFC 

- Major Issues: None

- Minor Issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-11

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team 
(Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF 
Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at: 
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq


Document: draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-11
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 09 October 2017
IETF LC End Date: 06 October 2017 
IESG Telechat Date: 12 October 2017

Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as proposed RFC 

- Major Issues: None

- Minor Issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-early-hints-04

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team 
(Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF 
Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

Document: draft-ietf-httpbis-early-hints-04
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 28 July 2017
IETF LC End Date: 05 July 2017 
IESG Telechat Date: 03 August 2017

Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as experimental RFC

- Major Issues: None

- Minor Issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.




___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-early-hints-03

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team 
(Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF 
Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

Document: draft-ietf-httpbis-early-hints-03
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 03 July 2017
IETF LC End Date: 05 July 2017 
IESG Telechat Date: 

Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as experimental RFC

- Major Issues: None

- Minor Issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost-08

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Document: draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost-08
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 06 April 2017
IETF LC End Date: 27 March 2017 
IETF Telechat Date: 13 April 2017

Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as proposed RFC

- Major Issues: None

- Minor Issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.




___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration-06

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq 
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>>

Document: draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration-06
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 04 January 2017
IETF LC End Date: 15 April 2016 
IETF Telechat Date: 05 January 2017

Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as proposed RFC

- Major Issues: None

- Minor Issues: None

Nits: 
Section 3.1: Please fill what is missing in "Route Origin Validation as defined 
by RFC 6480 [RFC6480] does not (???) modification to enable AS migration


Regards,

Wassim H.




___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-15

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq 
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>>

Document: draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-15
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 10 August 2016
IETF LC End Date: 01 August 2016
IETF Telechat Date: unknown

Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as proposed RFC

- Major Issues: None

- Minor Issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.



___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-15

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq 
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>>

Document: draft-ietf-rtcweb-transports-15
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 10 August 2016
IETF LC End Date: 01 August 2016
IETF Telechat Date: unknown

Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as proposed RFC

- Major Issues: None

- Minor Issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.




___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-tram-stun-path-data-03

[Wassim Haddad]

Am fine with it. Also I do suggest you add reference(s) to support the last 
sentence.


Thanks,

Wassim H.




> On Feb 17, 2016, at 23:24, Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)  
> wrote:
> 
> Sorry missed replying to the question. Yes, the draft briefly discusses about 
> it in the Introduction.
> 
>The technique described in this document can also be used with the
>ICE continuous nomination procedure explained in
>[I-D.uberti-mmusic-nombis 
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tram-stun-path-data-03#ref-I-D.uberti-mmusic-nombis>]
>  which allows the application to pick
>better candidate pairs as and when they appear.  Hence, ICE endpoints
>will be capable of switching the application data to a candidate pair
>that becomes available later and offers better path characteristics.
> 
> New candidate pairs appear because of availably of new interfaces.
>  
> -Tiru
> From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF [mailto:spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 7:09 PM
> To: Wassim Haddad
> Cc: gen-art; draft-ietf-tram-stun-path-data@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-tram-stun-path-data-03
>  
> Dear Authors,
>  
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Wassim Haddad  <mailto:wassim.had...@ericsson.com>> wrote:
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
> please see the FAQ at 
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq 
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>>
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-tram-stun-path-data-03
> Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
> Review Date: 11 February 2016
> IETF LC End Date: 11 February 2016
> IETF Telechat Date: unknown
> 
> Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as proposed RFC
> 
> - Major Issues: None
> 
> - Minor Issues: None
>  
> Question: Would it make sense to highlight the mobility case (since the 
> document explicitly mentions 3G, 4G, WiFi) in which case, applying the 
> described mechanism would suggest to the mobile to use a different interface 
> after attaching to a different network… 
>  
> I haven't seen a response to Wassim's question - did I miss it?
>  
> Thanks,
>  
> Spencer
>  
> Regards,
> 
> Wassim H.

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-tram-stun-path-data-03

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq 
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>>

Document: draft-ietf-tram-stun-path-data-03
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 11 February 2016
IETF LC End Date: 11 February 2016
IETF Telechat Date: unknown

Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as proposed RFC

- Major Issues: None

- Minor Issues: None

Question: Would it make sense to highlight the mobility case (since the 
document explicitly mentions 3G, 4G, WiFi) in which case, applying the 
described mechanism would suggest to the mobile to use a different interface 
after attaching to a different network… 


Regards,

Wassim H.

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-udp-return-path-04

[Wassim Haddad]

Re-sending…



> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: Wassim Haddad 
> Date: December 14, 2015 at 11:07:05 PST
> To: 
> Cc: Wassim Haddad , 
> 
> Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of 
> draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-udp-return-path-04
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
> please see the FAQ at 
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq 
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>>
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-udp-return-path-04
> Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
> Review Date: 14 December 2015
> IETF LC End Date: 15 December 2015
> IETF Telechat Date: unknown
> 
> Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as proposed RFC
> 
> - Major Issues: None
> 
> - Minor Issues: None
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Wassim H.

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-udp-return-path-04

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq 
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>>

Document: draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-udp-return-path-04
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 14 December 2015
IETF LC End Date: 15 December 2015
IETF Telechat Date: unknown

Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as proposed RFC

- Major Issues: None

- Minor Issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.



___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Fwd: Gen-Art Review of draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis-04

[Wassim Haddad]

Begin forwarded message:
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
> please see the FAQ at 
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis-04
> Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
> Review Date: 22 July 2015
> IETF LC End Date: 23 July 2015
> IETF Telechat Date: unknown
> 
> Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as proposed RFC
> 
> - Major Issues: None
> 
> - Minor Issues: None
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Wassim H.


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-Art Review of draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis-04

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Document: draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis-04
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 22 July 2015
IETF LC End Date: 23 July 2015
IETF Telechat Date: unknown

Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as proposed RFC

- Major Issues: None

- Minor Issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-sipcore-refer-clarifications-04

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Document: draft-ietf-sipcore-refer-clarifications-04
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 18 June 2015
IETF LC End Date: 17 June 2015
IETF Telechat Date: unknown

Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as proposed RFC

- Major Issues: None

- Minor Issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-oauth-introspection-08

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Document: draft-ietf-oauth-introspection-08
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 26 May 2015
IETF LC End Date: 01 June 2015
IETF Telechat Date: unknown

Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as proposed RFC

- Major Issues: None

- Minor Issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-dane-srv-13

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Document: draft-ietf-dane-srv-13
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 20 April 2015
IETF LC End Date: 17 April 2015
IETF Telechat Date: unknown

Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as proposed RFC

- Major Issues: None

- Minor Issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.




___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-housley-implementer-obligations-02

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Document: draft-housley-implementer-obligations-02
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 05 June 2014
IETF LC End Date: 06 June 2014
IETF Telechat Date: 

Summary:  This draft is ready to be published as informational standard


Major Issues: None

Minor Issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.



___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-straw-b2bua-loop-detection-04

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Document: draft-ietf-straw-b2bua-loop-detection-04
Reviewer: Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 23 Apr 2014
IETF LC End Date: 25 Apr 2014
IETF Telechat Date: 24 Apr 2014

Summary: This draft is ready to be published as proposed standard

Major Issues: None

Minor Issues: none


Regards,

Wassim H.



___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-turner-application-cms-media-type-07

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Document: draft-turner-application-cms-media-type-07
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 07 Jan 2014
IETF LC End Date: 27 Nov 2013
IETF Telechat Date: 09 Jan 2014

Summary:  This draft is ready to be published as informational standard

Major Issues: None

Minor Issues: none


Regards,

Wassim H.___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-payload-rtp-aptx

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Document: draft-ietf-payload-rtp-aptx-04
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 13 Dec 2013
IETF LC End Date: 06 Dec 2013
IETF Telechat Date: 19 Dec 2013

Summary:  This draft is ready to be published as proposed standard

Major Issues: None

Minor Issues: none


Regards,

Wassim H.


___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-netmod-iana-if-type-09

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Document: draft-ietf-netmod-iana-if-type-09
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 12 Dec 2013
IETF LC End Date: 23 Dec 2013
IETF Telechat Date: unknown

Summary:  This draft is ready to be published as proposed standard

Major Issues: None

Minor Issues: none


Regards,

Wassim H.___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-15

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Document: draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-15
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 20 Nov 2013
IETF LC End Date: 23 Sep 2013
IETF Telechat Date: 21 Nov 2013

Summary:  This draft is ready to be published as proposed standard

Major Issues: None

Minor Issues: none


Regards,

Wassim H.



___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates-10

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Document: draft-ietf-avtext-multiple-clock-rates-10
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 20 Nov 2013
IETF LC End Date: 22 Oct 2013
IETF Telechat Date: 21 Nov 2013

Summary:  This draft is almost ready for publication as proposed standard

- Major Issues: None

- Minor Issues: 

-> In the introduction section, I suggest re-wording the following (long and 
not so clear) sentence:

"Schulzrinne, et al. [RFC3550] lists using multiple clock rates as one of the 
reasons to not use different payloads on the same SSRC but unfortunately this 
advice has not always been followed and some RTP implementations change the 
payload in the same SSRC even if the different payloads use different clock 
rates".

-> Please consider adding the following to the terminology section:  
- SSRC,
- Lip,
- SR


Regards,

Wassim H.




___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] FW: Gen-ART Review of draft-housley-ltans-oids-01

[Wassim Haddad]

Re-sending…


Regards,

Wassim H.


From: Wassim Haddad 
mailto:wassim.had...@ericsson.com>>
Date: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 9:09 AM
To: "gen-art@ietf.org<mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>" 
mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>>
Cc: Wassim Haddad 
mailto:wassim.had...@ericsson.com>>, 
"housley-ltans-oids@tools.ietf.org<mailto:housley-ltans-oids@tools.ietf.org>"
 
mailto:housley-ltans-oids@tools.ietf.org>>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-housley-ltans-oids-01


I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Document: draft-housley-ltans-oids-01
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 13 August 2013
IETF LC End Date: 31 July 2013
IETF Telechat Date: 15 August 2013

Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as an informational RFC

- Major Issues: None

- Minor Issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-housley-ltans-oids-01

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Document: draft-housley-ltans-oids-01
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 13 August 2013
IETF LC End Date: 31 July 2013
IETF Telechat Date: 15 August 2013

Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as an informational RFC

- Major Issues: None

- Minor Issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-olsrv2-sec-03

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Document: draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-olsrv2-sec-03
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 05 August 2013
IETF LC End Date: 02 August 2013
IETF Telechat Date: 15 August 2013

Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as proposed standard 

- Major Issues: None

- Minor Issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.




___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-sparks-genarea-imaparch-06

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Document: draft-sparks-genarea-imaparch-06
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 01 May 2013
IETF LC End Date: 07 May 2013
IETF Telechat Date: unknown

Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as informational RFC

- Major Issues: None

- Minor Issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.





___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-summary-stat

[Wassim Haddad]

Sorry for the typo! Re-sending!


I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Document: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-summary-stat-08
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 19 Feb 2013
IETF LC End Date: 01 Feb 2013
IETF Telechat Date: 21 Feb 2013

Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as proposed standard.

- Major Issues: None

- Minor Issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.




___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-summary-stat

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Document: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-summary-stat-08
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 19 Feb 2013
IETF LC End Date: 01 Feb 2013
IETF Telechat Date: 21 Feb 2013

Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as proposed standard.

- Major Issues: None

- Minor Issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at 

Document: draft-ietf-paws-problem-stmt-usecases-rqmts-13
Reviewer:  Wassim M. Haddad
Review Date: 19 Feb 2013
IETF LC End Date: 15 Feb 2013
IETF Telechat Date: 21 Feb 2013

Summary:  Well written. This draft is ready for publication as informational 
standard.


- Major Issues: None

- Minor Issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.






___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ipfix-information-model-rfc5102bis-09

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Document: draft-ietf-ipfix-information-model-rfc5102bis-09
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 21 Jan 2013
IETF LC End Date: 23 Jan 2013
IETF Telechat Date: 24 Jan 2013

Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as proposed standard.

- Major Issues: None

- Minor Issues: None

- Editorial nits:

-> page 3  : section 1: s/informaiton/information
-> page 11: section 3.2.2 should begin with: "_A_ numeric value…
-> page 13: section 4: "Enterprises identifiers are _to_ be registered…"


Regards,

Wassim H.

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-6renum-enterprise-05

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Document: draft-ietf-6renum-enterprise-05
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 06 Jan 2013
IETF LC End Date: 12 Dec 2012
IETF Telechat Date: 10 Jan 2013

Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as informational standard.

- Major Issues: None

- Minor Issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-trill-oam-req-04

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Document: draft-ietf-trill-oam-req-04
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 06 Jan 2013
IETF LC End Date: 03 Jan 2013
IETF Telechat Date: 10 Jan 2013

Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as informational standard.

- Major Issues: None

- Minor Issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-delay-10

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Document: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-delay-10
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 11 Nov 2012
IETF LC End Date: 24 Oct 2012
IETF Telechat Date: 15 Nov 2012

Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as proposed standard.

- Major Issues: None

- Minor Issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.






___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Fwd: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-local-civic-09

[Wassim Haddad]

Re-sending with the correct email address


Regards,

Wassim H.





Begin forwarded message:

> From: Wassim Haddad 
> Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-local-civic-09
> Date: October 21, 2012 11:38:38 PM PDT
> To: Gen-art 
> Cc: Wassim Haddad , 
> "draft-ietf-geopriv-local-civic-09@tools.ietf.org" 
> , Alissa Cooper 
> 
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
> please see the FAQ at 
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-geopriv-local-civic-09
> Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
> Review Date:  21 Oct 2012
> IETF LC End Date: 04 Oct 2012
> IETF Telechat Date: 25 Oct 2012
> 
> Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as proposed standard.
> 
> - Major Issues: None
> 
> - Minor Issues: None
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Wassim H.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-local-civic-09

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Document: draft-ietf-geopriv-local-civic-09
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date:  21 Oct 2012
IETF LC End Date: 04 Oct 2012
IETF Telechat Date: 25 Oct 2012

Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as proposed standard.

- Major Issues: None

- Minor Issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.





___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-16

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Document: draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-16
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date:  10 Oct 2012
IETF LC End Date: 22 Aug 2012
IETF Telechat Date: 11 Oct 2012

Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as proposed standard.

- Major Issues: None

- Minor Issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-avtext-splicing-for-rtp

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Document: draft-ietf-avtext-splicing-for-rtp-09
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date:  08 Oct 2012
IETF LC End Date: 03 Apr 2012
IETF Telechat Date: 11 Oct 2012

Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as informational standard.

- Major Issues: None

- Minor Issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.





___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-isis-mi-07

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background 
on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at 
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Document: draft-ietf-isis-mi-07
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date:  24 Sept 2012
IETF LC End Date: 05 Sept 2012
IETF Telechat Date: 27 Sept. 2012

Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as proposed standard.

- Major Issues: None

- Minor Issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.





___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-grow-diverse-bgp-path-dist-07

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.

Please resolve these comments along with any other comments you may receive.

Document:  draft-ietf-grow-diverse-bgp-path-dist-07
Reviewer: Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 2012-07-15
IETF LC End Date: 2012-07-19
IESG Telechat date: 2012-07-19

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as informational standard.

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Editorial nit: suggest replacing "then" with "than" (except in section 4.2)


Regards,

Wassim H.





___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-abfab-gss-eap-08

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.

Please resolve these comments along with any other comments you may receive.

Document:  draft-ietf-abfab-gss-eap-08
Reviewer: Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 2012-07-15
IETF LC End Date: 2012-07-10
IESG Telechat date: 2012-07-19

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as proposed standard.

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.





___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-intarea-ipv4-id-update-05

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.

Please resolve these comments along with any other comments you may receive.

Document:  draft-ietf-intarea-ipv4-id-update-05
Reviewer: Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 2012-07-03
IETF LC End Date: 2012-06-14
IESG Telechat date: 2012-07-05

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as proposed standard.

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-cdni-problem-statement-06

[Wassim Haddad]

Thanks a lot!


Wassim H.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 22, 2012, at 10:37, "Ben Niven-Jenkins"  wrote:

> Wassim,
> 
> Thanks for the review, please see below:
> 
> On 19/06/2012 19:44, "Wassim Haddad"  wrote:
> 
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
>> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
>> http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
>> 
>> Please resolve these comments along with any other comments you may
>> receive.
>> 
>> Document:  draft-ietf-cdni-problem-statement-06
>> Reviewer: Wassim Haddad
>> Review Date: 2012-06-19
>> IETF LC End Date: 2012-06-06
>> IESG Telechat date: 2012-06-21
>> 
>> Summary: This draft is ready for publication as informational standard
>> but one (helpful) addition is suggested.
>> 
>> Major issues: None
>> 
>> Minor issues: 
>> 
>> - Sectiom 1.1: suggest defining "Quality of Experience" (mentioned 4
>> times in the document)
> 
> In my working copy, I have added the following to the terminology section:
> 
>   Quality of Experience (QoE): As defined in Section 2.4 of [RFC6390]
> 
> (Thanks Benoit for the pointer)
> 
> Ben


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-cdni-problem-statement-06

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at 
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.

Please resolve these comments along with any other comments you may receive.

Document:  draft-ietf-cdni-problem-statement-06
Reviewer: Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 2012-06-19
IETF LC End Date: 2012-06-06
IESG Telechat date: 2012-06-21

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as informational standard but one 
(helpful) addition is suggested.

Major issues: None

Minor issues: 

- Sectiom 1.1: suggest defining "Quality of Experience" (mentioned 4 times in 
the document)


Regards,

Wassim H.

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ledbat-congestion-09

[Wassim Haddad]

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team reviewer for this draft. 
For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Please resolve these comments along with any other comments you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-ledbat-congestion-09
Reviewer: Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 23-May-2012
IESG Telechat date: 24-May-2012

Summary: The document is ready for publication as an experimental RFC. 

Major Issues: None
Minor Issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.





___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-sync-17

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at 
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.

Please resolve these comments along with any other comments you may receive.

Document:  draft-ietf-ecrit-lost-sync-17
Reviewer: Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 2012-04-24
IETF LC End Date: 2012-04-18
IESG Telechat date: 2012-04-26

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as experimental standard but some 
clarifications/re-writings would be helpful.

Major issues: None

Minor issues: 

- Perhaps I missed it somewhere in the document, but I could not find the 
meaning of "ESRPs" (page 5)
- Suggest re-writing the last paragraph on page 8 
- Suggest re-writing the 3-line paragraph on page 9


Regards,

Wassim H.





___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-manet-packetbb-sec-08

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-manet-packetbb-sec-08
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad 
Review Date:  27 Feb 2012
IETF LC End Date: 02/27/2012
IESG Telechat Date: 03/01/2012

Summary: The draft is ready for publication as proposed standard

Major issues: none
Minor issues: none


Regards,

Wassim H.





___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-impairments

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at < 
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a 
new version of the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-impairments-08
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 2011-12-13
IETF LC End Date: 2011-10-11
IESG Telechat date: 2011-12-15

Summary:  This document is ready to be published as an informational RFC

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Editorial nits:

- In Security considerations section: s/maybe/may be


Regards,

Wassim H.


___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-netconf-access-control

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at < 
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a 
new version of the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-netconf-access-control-06 
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 2011-11-29
IETF LC End Date: 2011-11-28
IESG Telechat date: 2011-12-01

Summary:  This document is ready to be published as proposed standard.

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-avtext-mixer-to-client-audio-level-05

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at < 
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a 
new version of the draft.

Document:  draft-ietf-avtext-mixer-to-client-audio-level-05
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: November 1st, 2011
IESG Telechat date: November 3rd, 2011

Summary:  This document is ready to be published as a proposed standard.

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-09

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at < 
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a 
new version of the draft.

Document:  draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-09
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: November 1st, 2011
IETF LC End Date: August 08, 2011
IESG Telechat date: November 03, 2011

Summary:  This document is almsot ready to be published as a proposed standard.

Major issues: None


Minor issues: 

- The draft mentions twice "MANETs" in the "abstract" and "introduction" 
sections without elaborating on that nor giving any reference specific to it.  
Since, MANETs has a set of routing protocols and in order to avoid confusion, 
some further clarification about OSPFv3 in that context would IMHO be helpful.


Regards,

Wassim H.

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-behave-v4v6-bih-06

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at < 
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a 
new version of the draft.

Document:  draft-ietf-behave-v4v6-bih-06
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: October 3rd, 2011
IETF LC End Date: TBD
IESG Telechat date: October 06, 2011

Summary:  This document is ready to be published as a proposed standard.

Major issues: None

Minor issues: IMHO, it makes sense to better clarify the connection to the two 
RFCs 2767 and 3338 as the draft states that it "obsoletes" them in the 
abstract, "updates" them in the Introduction, is a "direct update to and 
directly derivative" from them (sub-section 1.1), then "combines and obsoletes" 
them in section 8.


Regards,

Wassim H.





___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] : Review of draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-radius-ext-05

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at < 
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a 
new version of the draft.

Document:  draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-radius-ext-05
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: August 10, 2011
IETF LC End Date: July 15, 2011
IESG Telechat date: August 11, 2011

Summary:  This document is ready to be published as a proposed standard.

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.





___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] : Review of draft-ietf-codec-requirements-04

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at < 
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a 
new version of the draft.

Document:  draft-ietf-codec-requirements-04
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: July 13, 2011
IETF LC End Date: June 30, 2011
IESG Telechat date: July 14, 2011

Summary:  This document is ready to be published as an information RFC.

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments: IMHO, if no other security-related comments have to be 
added (which seems to be the case), then section 4.1 should find its way to the 
security considerations section instead of the latter referring to it


Regards,

Wassim H.







smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-linear-protection-07

[Wassim Haddad]

Resending...


Regards,

Wassim H.





Begin forwarded message:

> From: Wassim Haddad 
> Date: July 12, 2011 4:11:43 PM PDT
> To: Gen-art 
> Cc: Wassim Haddad , 
> "draft-ietf-mpls-tp-linear-protection-07@tools.ietf.org" 
> 
> Subject: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-linear-protection-07
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
> please see the FAQ at 
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you 
> may receive.
> 
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-linear-protection-07
> Reviewer: Wassim Haddad
> Review Date:2011–07–12
> IETF LC End Date: 2011–07–05
> IESG Telechat date:
> 
> Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a standard track RFC.  
> 
> Major issues: None
> 
> Minor issues: None
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Wassim H.

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-linear-protection-07

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you 
may receive.

 
Document: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-linear-protection-07
Reviewer: Wassim Haddad
Review Date:2011–07–12
IETF LC End Date: 2011–07–05
IESG Telechat date:
 
Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a standard track RFC.  
 
Major issues: None  
 
Minor issues: None
 

Regards,

Wassim H.





___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-pim-mtid-08

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at < 
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a 
new version of the draft.

Document:  draft-ietf-pim-mtid-08
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: June 29, 2011
IETF LC End Date:
IESG Telechat date: June 30, 2011

Summary:  This document is ready to be published as a proposed standard.

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments: None


Regards,

Wassim H.





___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay-profile-03

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at < 
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a 
new version of the draft.

Document:  draft-ietf-mpls-tp-loss-delay-profile-03
Reviewer:  Wassim Haddad
Review Date: June 29, 2011
IETF LC End Date:
IESG Telechat date: June 30, 2011

Summary:  This document is ready to be published as Informational RFC

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:

Page 1: Abstract: remove _the_ efficient and accurate measurement


Regards,

Wassim H.





___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-dhc-duid-uuid

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at 
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other last call comments you may 
receive.

Document: draft-ietf-dhc-duid-uuid-03
Document title: Definition of the UUID-based DHCPv6 Unique Identifier 
(DUID-UUID)

Reviewer: Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 08-June-2011
IETF LC End Date: 01-June-2011
IESG Telechat date: 09-June-2011

Summary: This document is ready for publication as a proposed standard

- Major Issue(s): None
- Minor Issue(s): None

- Editorial:

Section 2: One issue that has arisen concerns ... devices that employ


Regards,

Wassim H.





___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] [GenArt] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects-01

[Wassim Haddad]

I think it does. Thanks a lot!


Cheers,

Wassim H.





On May 10, 2011, at 7:40 PM, Terry Manderson wrote:

> The justification for using SHOULD has been included in the -03 draft of the
> document. (diff attached)
> 
> The other minor issue in wording "it should use" was fixed in an earlier
> version.
> 
> Does this clear up your concerns?
> 
> Cheers
> Terry
> 
> On 17/03/11 7:20 AM, "Wassim Haddad"  wrote:
> 
>> Sorry for re-sending 3 times...
>> 
>> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>>> From: Wassim Haddad 
>>> Date: March 16, 2011 2:16:57 PM PDT
>>> To: Gen-art 
>>> Cc: Wassim Haddad ,
>>> "draft-ietf-sidr-iana-obje...@ietf.org"
>>> 
>>> Subject: [GenArt] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects-01
>>> 
>>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects. For
>>> background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
>>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>>> 
>>> Please resolve these comments along with any other last call comments
>>> you may receive.
>>> 
>>> Document: draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects-01
>>> Title: RPKI Objects Issued by IANA
>>> Reviewer: Wassim M Haddad
>>> Review Date: 16-March-2011
>>> IETF LC End Date: 11-March-2011
>>> IESG Telechat date: 17-March 2011
>>> 
>>> Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard but 
>>> it
>>> would be helpful for the reader to clarify one item
>>> 
>>> - Major issue: none
>>> - Minor issue: in the abstract, the draft says that "it provides specific
>>> directions to IANA" then it ends with: "it should use".
>>> The reader might be confused as to what "specific" vs "should" can mean in
>>> this context.
>>> 
>>> idem for s as to why there is a SHOULD again in page 7 (section 5: Reserved
>>> Resources): it mentions "SHOULD" issue an AS0 ROA.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Wassim H.
>> 
> 
> 

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for 
draft-ietf-v6ops-v6--whitelisting-implications
For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
< http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other last call comments 
you may receive. 


Document: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6--whitelisting-implications-03
Reviewer: Wassim M Haddad
Review Date: 2011-04-28
IETF Last Call End Date: 2011-04-11
IESG Telechat Date: 2011-04-29

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as informational standard.


Major Issue: None

Minor Issue: None


Regards,

Wassim H.







smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-mif-current-practices

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-ietf-mif-current-practices-09. 
For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
< http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other last call comments 
you may receive. 


Document: draft-ietf-mif-current-practices-09
Reviewer: Wassim M Haddad
Review Date: 2011-04-24
IETF Last Call End Date: 2011-04-11
IESG Telechat Date: 2011-04-28

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as informational standard.

Major Issue: None

Minor Issue: 

- Am a bit confused as to why the draft should list available products in the 
market and analyze them (note that such effort is highly appreciated and very 
informative) but is this something really needed in an IETF "informational 
RFC"? 


Regards,

Wassim H.







smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Fwd: Review of draft-ietf-sidr-ta

[Wassim Haddad]

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Wassim Haddad 
> Date: March 16, 2011 3:55:39 PM PDT
> To: Gen-art 
> Cc: Wassim Haddad , 
> "draft-ietf-sidr-ta-06@tools.ietf.org" 
> 
> Subject: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-ta
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft draft-ietf-sidr-ta-06. For 
> background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other last call comments 
> you may receive. 
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-sidr-ta-06
> Reviewer: Wassim M Haddad
> Review Date: 2011-03-16
> IETF Last Call End Date: 2011-03-22
> IESG Telechat Date:
> 
> Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a proposed standard.
> 
> Major Issue: None
> Minor Issue: None
> 
> Editorial:
> 
> - section 2.2: This measure also allows... to be used "to" revoke the
> - section 3: ... relating to the validity "of" attestation made... 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Wassim H.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-ta

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft draft-ietf-sidr-ta-06. For 
background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
< http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other last call comments 
you may receive. 

Document: draft-ietf-sidr-ta-06
Reviewer: Wassim M Haddad
Review Date: 2011-03-16
IETF Last Call End Date: 2011-03-22
IESG Telechat Date:

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a proposed standard.

Major Issue: None
Minor Issue: None

Editorial:

- section 2.2: This measure also allows... to be used "to" revoke the
- section 3: ... relating to the validity "of" attestation made... 


Regards,

Wassim H.





___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Fwd: [GenArt] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects-01

[Wassim Haddad]

Sorry for re-sending 3 times...


Begin forwarded message:

> From: Wassim Haddad 
> Date: March 16, 2011 2:16:57 PM PDT
> To: Gen-art 
> Cc: Wassim Haddad , 
> "draft-ietf-sidr-iana-obje...@ietf.org" 
> 
> Subject: [GenArt] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects-01
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects. For 
> background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at 
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other last call comments 
> you may receive.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects-01
> Title: RPKI Objects Issued by IANA
> Reviewer: Wassim M Haddad
> Review Date: 16-March-2011
> IETF LC End Date: 11-March-2011
> IESG Telechat date: 17-March 2011
> 
> Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard but it 
> would be helpful for the reader to clarify one item
> 
> - Major issue: none
> - Minor issue: in the abstract, the draft says that "it provides specific 
> directions to IANA" then it ends with: "it should use". 
> The reader might be confused as to what "specific" vs "should" can mean in 
> this context.
> 
> idem for s as to why there is a SHOULD again in page 7 (section 5: Reserved 
> Resources): it mentions "SHOULD" issue an AS0 ROA.  
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Wassim H.

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] [GenArt] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects-01

[Wassim Haddad]

> From: Wassim Haddad 
> Date: March 16, 2011 2:16:57 PM PDT
> To: Gen-art 
> Cc: Wassim Haddad , 
> "draft-ietf-sidr-iana-obje...@ietf.org" 
> 
> Subject: [GenArt] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects-01
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects. For 
> background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at 
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other last call comments 
> you may receive.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects-01
> Title: RPKI Objects Issued by IANA
> Reviewer: Wassim M Haddad
> Review Date: 16-March-2011
> IETF LC End Date: 11-March-2011
> IESG Telechat date: 17-March 2011
> 
> Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard but it 
> would be helpful for the reader to clarify one item
> 
> - Major issue: none
> - Minor issue: in the abstract, the draft says that "it provides specific 
> directions to IANA" then it ends with: "it should use". 
> The reader might be confused as to what "specific" vs "should" can mean in 
> this context.
> 
> idem for s as to why there is a SHOULD again in page 7 (section 5: Reserved 
> Resources): it mentions "SHOULD" issue an AS0 ROA.  
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Wassim H.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] [GenArt] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects-01

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects. For 
background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at 
.

Please resolve these comments along with any other last call comments 
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-sidr-iana-objects-01
Title: RPKI Objects Issued by IANA
Reviewer: Wassim M Haddad
Review Date: 16-March-2011
IETF LC End Date: 11-March-2011
IESG Telechat date: 17-March 2011

Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard but it 
would be helpful for the reader to clarify one item

- Major issue: none
- Minor issue: in the abstract, the draft says that "it provides specific 
directions to IANA" then it ends with: "it should use". 
The reader might be confused as to what "specific" vs "should" can mean in this 
context.

idem for s as to why there is a SHOULD again in page 7 (section 5: Reserved 
Resources): it mentions "SHOULD" issue an AS0 ROA.  


Regards,

Wassim H.





___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-req-15

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-req. For 
background on 
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at 
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other last call comments you may 
receive.

Document: draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-req-15
Reviewer: Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 2011-02-15
IESG Telechat date: 2011-02-17


Summary: This draft is ready for publication as informational RFC

- Major issues: none
- Minor issues: none


Suggestion:

The 3rd sub-section in the abstract can be removed.


Regards,

Wassim H.

___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ymbk-aplusp-08

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other last call comments you 
may receive.

Document: draft-ymbk-aplusp-08
Reviewer: Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 2011-02-11
IETF LC End Date: 2011-02-07
IESG Telechat date: 2011-02-17

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as experimental RFC

Major issues: none
Minor issues: none


Regards,

Wassim H.





___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-sieve-notify-presence-03

[Wassim Haddad]

Hi Barry,

Thanks a lot for the clarification!


Wassim H.





On Nov 29, 2010, at 11:48 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:

> Hi, Wassim, and thanks for the review.
> 
>> Nits/editorial comments:
>> 
>> - In the security considerations section:
>> Better to say "unexpected" instead of "unexpectedly"?
> 
> No; this needs the adverb, and "unexpectedly" is the correct word.
> 
> Barry
> ___
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-sieve-notify-presence-03

[Wassim Haddad]

Hi,

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-ietf-sieve-notify-presence-03
(For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at 
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html)

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may 
receive.

Reviewer: Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 2010-11-29
IETF LC End Date: 2010-11-09
IESG Telechat date: 2010-12-02
 
Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a proposed standard RFC. 
 
Major issues: None  
 
Minor issues: None
 
Nits/editorial comments: 

- In the security considerations section: 
Better to say "unexpected" instead of "unexpectedly"?
 


Regards,

Wassim H.





___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-grow-bgp-graceful-shutdown-requirements-04

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other last call comments you may 
receive.

Document: draft-ietf-grow-bgp-graceful-shutdown-requirements-04
Reviewer: Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 2010-10-06
IETF LC End Date: 2010-09-27
IESG Telechat date: 2010-10-07

Summary: The draft is ready for publication as an informational standard. 

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None



Regards,

Wassim H.





___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-netmod-arch-07

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at .

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may 
receive.

Document: draft-ietf-netmod-arch-07
Title: "An Architecture for Network Management using NETCONF and YANG"


Reviewer: Wassim M. Haddad
Review Date: 2010-08-05
IETF LC End Date: 2010-08-05
IESG Telechat date: N/A

Summary: This document is ready for publication as an Informational RFC.

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.


___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] [Gen-Art] Gen-Art Last Call Review of draft-ietf-martini-reqs-08

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-martini-reqs-08
Reviewer: Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 07-13-2010
IETF LC End Date: 07-09-2010
IESG Telechat date: 07-15-2010

Summary: This draft is ready as an Informational RFC.

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.







smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-Art LC Review of draft-ietf-avt-forward-shifted-red-05

[Wassim Haddad]

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at 
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq

Please resolve these comments along with any other comments you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-avt-forward-shifted-red-05
Reviewer: Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 13-July-2010
IETF LC End Date: 09-July-2010
IESG Telechat date: 15-July-2010

Summary: The document is ready for publication as a a proposed standard.

Major issues: none

Minor issues: none

Nits/editorial comments:

- The Abstract points to one reference and it would be better to remove it.

- Section 3: I would suggest re-writing the last three lines to make the 
sentence easier to understand: 
"and is hence a time..." should be re-written.


Regards,

Wassim H.







smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] [GenArt] Review of draft-ietf-stone-mgcp-vbd-07

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you 
may receive.

Document: draft-stone-mgcp-vbd-07
Reviewer: Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 2010-07-08
IETF LC End Date: 2010-07-09
IESG Telechat date: unknown

Summary: This draft is ready to be published as informational RFC.

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:

- Section 8: 

suggestion: "In this section, we provide two call flows examples".

- Page 37: step 7:

s/turns/turn (and add ",")


Regards,

Wassim H.





___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp-sctp-12

[Wassim Haddad]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp-sctp-12.
For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at 
.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may 
receive.

IETF LC End Date: 06 / 01 / 2010
IESG Telechat date: 06 / 03 / 2010


Summary:

The draft is ready for publication as experimental RFC.


Major Issues: None


Minor Issues: None


Nits/editorial comments:

- Page 5, section 2: suggest re-wording of: 
"A messaging association is bidirectional.  A messaging association is 
bi-directional: signaling messages can be sent over it in either direction, 
referring to flows of either direction".

- Page 7, section 3.3: which would be particularly useful  

 ^^
- Page 10: Note that replay protection
 


Regards,

Wassim H.







smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-mattsson-mikey-ticket-03

[Wassim Haddad]

Hi,

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-mattsson-mikey-ticket-03
(For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at 
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html)

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting 
a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-mattsson-mikey-ticket-03
Reviewer: Wassim Haddad
Review Date: May, 05, 2010
IETF LC End Date: Done
IESG Telechat date: May, 06 2010

Summary:  The document is ready for publication as informational.


Regards,

Wassim H.







smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-reschke-rfc2231-in-http-11

[Wassim Haddad]

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for 
this draft 
(for background on Gen-ART, please see 
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a 
new version of the 
draft.

Document: draft-reschke-rfc2231-in-http-11
Reviewer: Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 21 April 2010
IETF LC End Date: Done
IESG Telechat date: 22 April 2010

Summary:  The document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard.

- Major Issues: None
- Minor Issues: None


Regards,

Wassim H.
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] [Gen-ART] review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-auth-opt-10.txt

[Wassim Haddad]

Hi Joe,

It is my mistake for not cc'ing the draft authors in my email to Gen-ART and I 
apologize for that.
Thanks for the clarification about "only" (it appeared to me first that the 
presence of the keyID "alone" may lead to breaking the unlinkability).


Regards,

Wassim H.


On Mar 10, 2010, at 2:35 PM, Joe Touch wrote:

> Hi, all,
> 
> Including both TSV ADs, the WG chairs, and the authors in this response.
> See below.
> 
> PS - it would be useful to include the document authors in Gen-ART
> posts; we received this message indirectly by the IESG.
> 
> Joe
> 
> 
>>  Original Message 
>> Subject: [Gen-art] [Gen-ART] review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-auth-opt-10.txt
>> Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 17:15:31 -0700
>> From: Wassim Haddad 
>> To: Gen-art , Lars Eggert 
>> CC: Wassim Haddad 
>> 
>> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer
>> for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
>> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
>> 
>> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
>> you may receive.
>> 
>> Document: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-auth-opt-10
>> Reviewer: Wassim Haddad
>> Review Date: 2010-03-09
>> LC End Date: 2010-03-11 IESG Telechat date: 2010-03-11
>> 
>> Summary: Ready
>> 
>> Major issues: None
>> 
>> Minor issues:
>> 
>> - Page 13, Figure 3: traffic keys derived show two "Send_Other_key" in
>> all 3 boxes.
>> Shouldn't be Rcv_Other_key?
> 
> Yes. To be fixed.
> 
>> - Page 37: sub-section 2: a) Privacy: "TCP exposes "only" the MKT IDs,
>> MAC, and overall option.
>> Question: is "only" really needed?
> 
> In this context, I believe so. The previous paragraph discusses other
> information that could have been included, and this sentence underscores
> that such information is not.
> 
>> Editorial/nits:
>> 
>> - section 2.1: TCP-AO "is" not intended to replace the use of IPsec...
> 
> To be fixed.
> 
>> - section 2.2: IMHO, the following sentence is not clear:
>> 
>> "This document differs from an IPsec/IKE solution in that TCP-AO as
>> follows:"
> 
> To be fixed.
> 
>> - section 3: In this document, the characters ">>" proceeding...
>> Is it proceeding or preceding?
> 
> The latter. To be fixed.
> 
>> - section 4.2: "The TCP-AO option fields do not indicate the MAC
>> algorithm either implicitly (as with TCP MD5) or explicitly.
>> 
>> either/or -> neither/nor
> 
> The negative is already in the front of the sentence, so this should not
> be updated as suggested.
> 
>> - section 5.2:
>> 
>> remove "Figure" (repeated twice)
> 
> To be fixed.
> 
> ---








smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] [Gen-ART] review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-auth-opt-10.txt

[Wassim Haddad]

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for 
this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see 
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may 
receive.

Document: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-auth-opt-10
Reviewer: Wassim Haddad 
Review Date: 2010-03-09 
LC End Date: 2010-03-11 IESG Telechat date: 2010-03-11

Summary: Ready

Major issues: None

Minor issues:

- Page 13, Figure 3: traffic keys derived show two "Send_Other_key" in all 3 
boxes.
Shouldn't be Rcv_Other_key?

- Page 37: sub-section 2: a) Privacy: "TCP exposes "only" the MKT IDs, MAC, and 
overall option.
Question: is "only" really needed?


Editorial/nits:

- section 2.1: TCP-AO "is" not intended to replace the use of IPsec...

- section 2.2: IMHO, the following sentence is not clear:

"This document differs from an IPsec/IKE solution in that TCP-AO as follows:"

- section 3: In this document, the characters ">>" proceeding...
Is it proceeding or preceding?

- section 4.2: "The TCP-AO option fields do not indicate the MAC algorithm 
either implicitly (as with TCP MD5) or explicitly.

either/or -> neither/nor

- section 5.2:

remove "Figure" (repeated twice)



Regards,

Wassim H.







smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] review of draft-arkko-pana-iana-02

[Wassim Haddad]

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for
this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
may receive.

Document: draft-arkko-pana-iana-02
Reviewer: Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 2010-03-09
LC End Date: 2010-03-11 IESG Telechat date: 2010-03-11

Summary: Ready

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Editorial/nits:

Section 1: Introduction: last line:
-> suggest removing "an"

Section 2: IANA considerations: 1st line:
-> s/updated/update


Regards,

Wassim H.


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] review of draft-westerlund-mmusic-3gpp-sdp-rtsp-07

[Wassim Haddad]

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at 
<http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html>.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a 
new version of the draft.

Please resolve these comments along with any other last call comments you may 
receive.


Document: draft-westerlund-mmusic-3gpp-sdp-rtsp-07
Reviewer: Wassim Haddad
Review Date: 2010-03-01

Summary: Ready

Major issues: None

Minor issues: 


 
- Definitions:

- RTSP: "Real" Time Streaming Protocol
- QoE: In PSS, (add comma)


2. Introduction:

s/later/subsequent

"there has occasionally been _a_ need to extend…"
s/functionality/functionalities


IMHO, the following is not clear. I suggest re-writing:

"The document begins with two chapters presenting the different
extensions of SDP for PSS and MBMS, respectively, followed by a
section noting that offer/answer considerations are not applicable here".


3. "or" addressed => "nor" addressed

s/change/changing


4. IMHO, the following is ambiguous. I suggest re-writing:

"They are informatively listed below grouped by purpose"


4.3: 

- s/they/the
- s/keymanagement/key management


4.5:

- s/of [PSS…] /in [PSS…]


5.3. 
For release 6, one such parameter is defined to specify the required…


5.4. 

- s/and/or
- As required by SDP [RFC4566], (add comma)


5.4.1

- For FEC-protected RTP streams, (add comma)


7.4.

- s/happen/happens


7.5.

- … been given "x-" name, (add comma)
- it was too late "to" rename them due to deployment.


7.7.

- It is only a syntax restriction server "that" manufacturers follow…


9. 

- Also in this case, (add comma)

- IMHO, the last paragraph should clarify what authors mean by: 

"The media stream and the protocols identified by the protocol identifier may 
however contain security issues by themselves".



Regards,

Wassim H.







smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-kato-tls-rfc4132bis-04

[Wassim Haddad]

Hi,

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-kato-tls-rfc4132bis-04
(For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at 
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html)

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may 
receive.

draft-kato-tls-rfc4132bis-04
Reviewer: Wassim Haddad (wassim.had...@ericsson.com)

Summary:
This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be 
fixed before publication.


Comments:

The abstract should not contain a reference.
The security considerations should also mention the cryptanalysis references 
about the strenght 
of the Camelia Cipher suites (as in RFC4132). 


Regards,

Wassim H.






smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art