Re: [Gen-art] [6lo] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment-08
Francesca, thanks for your review. Pascal, thanks for your response. I entered a No Objection ballot. Best, Alissa > On Feb 3, 2020, at 2:40 AM, Francesca Palombini > wrote: > > Looks good Pascal. Thanks for your quick update! > > Francesca > > On 31/01/2020, 10:55, "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" wrote: > >Hello Francesca: > >Many thanks for your review : ) > > >> Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication. However, I noticed >> the >> normative reference to an informative document, draft-ietf-lwig-6lowpan- >> virtual-reassembly (ref. 'LWIG-VRB'), which is problematic, since this draft >> is >> on the standard track. > >Moved both this and the reference to recoverable frags to informational. > They are just illustrative anyway. > >> >> Major issues: - >> >> Minor issues: - >> >> Nits/editorial comments: >> >> * Last paragraph of Section 5, I suggest a minor reformulation for clarity. >> >> OLD: >> An associated >> caveat is that on a half duplex radio, if node A sends the next >> fragment at the same time as node B forwards the previous fragment to >> a node C down the path then node B will miss the next fragment. >> NEW: >> An associated >> caveat is that on a half duplex radio, if node A sends the next >> fragment at the same time as node B forwards the previous fragment to >> a node C down the path then node B will miss the next fragment from node >> A. >> > >Applied, and published 09. Please let me know if we are all set now? > > >Again, many thanks, Francesca! > >Pascal > > > ___ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
Re: [Gen-art] [6lo] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment-08
Looks good Pascal. Thanks for your quick update! Francesca On 31/01/2020, 10:55, "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" wrote: Hello Francesca: Many thanks for your review : ) > Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication. However, I noticed the > normative reference to an informative document, draft-ietf-lwig-6lowpan- > virtual-reassembly (ref. 'LWIG-VRB'), which is problematic, since this draft is > on the standard track. Moved both this and the reference to recoverable frags to informational. They are just illustrative anyway. > > Major issues: - > > Minor issues: - > > Nits/editorial comments: > > * Last paragraph of Section 5, I suggest a minor reformulation for clarity. > > OLD: >An associated >caveat is that on a half duplex radio, if node A sends the next >fragment at the same time as node B forwards the previous fragment to >a node C down the path then node B will miss the next fragment. > NEW: >An associated >caveat is that on a half duplex radio, if node A sends the next >fragment at the same time as node B forwards the previous fragment to >a node C down the path then node B will miss the next fragment from node > A. > Applied, and published 09. Please let me know if we are all set now? Again, many thanks, Francesca! Pascal ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
Re: [Gen-art] [6lo] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6lo-minimal-fragment-08
Hello Francesca: Many thanks for your review : ) > Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication. However, I noticed the > normative reference to an informative document, draft-ietf-lwig-6lowpan- > virtual-reassembly (ref. 'LWIG-VRB'), which is problematic, since this draft > is > on the standard track. Moved both this and the reference to recoverable frags to informational. They are just illustrative anyway. > > Major issues: - > > Minor issues: - > > Nits/editorial comments: > > * Last paragraph of Section 5, I suggest a minor reformulation for clarity. > > OLD: >An associated >caveat is that on a half duplex radio, if node A sends the next >fragment at the same time as node B forwards the previous fragment to >a node C down the path then node B will miss the next fragment. > NEW: >An associated >caveat is that on a half duplex radio, if node A sends the next >fragment at the same time as node B forwards the previous fragment to >a node C down the path then node B will miss the next fragment from node > A. > Applied, and published 09. Please let me know if we are all set now? Again, many thanks, Francesca! Pascal ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
