Re: [Gendergap] List of lists of women

2012-02-12 Thread John Vandenberg
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 3:44 AM, emijrp emi...@gmail.com wrote:
 ..
 By the way, I'm interested in searching for missing female biographies
 comparing Wikipedia biographical corpora in an automated way and make some
 lists of red links. I will think about that.

I've made an attempt at doing this by using a PD Australian book that
included female bios.
Of the 21 female bios I could find, 10 didnt appear to have have a WP bio. ;-(

https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Index_talk:Johns%27s_notable_Australians_1908.djvu

I see two women at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Missing_encyclopedia_articles/DNB,_people_prominent_in_ODNB
and many more in the pages at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:DNBFooter

The full text of DNB is available on Wikisource:
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:WikiProject_DNB/Djvu_files

-- 
John Vandenberg

___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


Re: [Gendergap] List of lists of women

2012-02-12 Thread emijrp
Yes, that is a possible approach John. But I was speaking about comparing
all the biographies between different Wikipedias and discover missing
females bios in each one.

By the way, I'm not interested any more in developing tools or statistics
for this movement. I recently discovered that WikiWomenCamp[1] is going to
exclude men from participating. I unsubscribe from this mailing list. Good
luck.

[1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiWomenCamp

2012/2/12 John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com

 On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 3:44 AM, emijrp emi...@gmail.com wrote:
  ..
  By the way, I'm interested in searching for missing female biographies
  comparing Wikipedia biographical corpora in an automated way and make
 some
  lists of red links. I will think about that.

 I've made an attempt at doing this by using a PD Australian book that
 included female bios.
 Of the 21 female bios I could find, 10 didnt appear to have have a WP bio.
 ;-(


 https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Index_talk:Johns%27s_notable_Australians_1908.djvu

 I see two women at

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Missing_encyclopedia_articles/DNB,_people_prominent_in_ODNB
 and many more in the pages at
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:DNBFooter

 The full text of DNB is available on Wikisource:
 https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:WikiProject_DNB/Djvu_files

 --
 John Vandenberg

 ___
 Gendergap mailing list
 Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


Re: [Gendergap] List of lists of women

2012-02-12 Thread Laura Hale
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:05 AM, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:


 I've made an attempt at doing this by using a PD Australian book that
 included female bios.
 Of the 21 female bios I could find, 10 didnt appear to have have a WP bio.
 ;-(


 https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Index_talk:Johns%27s_notable_Australians_1908.djvu

 I see two women at

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Missing_encyclopedia_articles/DNB,_people_prominent_in_ODNB
 and many more in the pages at
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:DNBFooter

 The full text of DNB is available on Wikisource:
 https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:WikiProject_DNB/Djvu_files


Maybe we could try to do something like Stuartyeates has been doing for
Kiwis in general specifically targeting women? :)  I've asked him if he
could possibly use it to semi-automatically allow me to create articles
about players in the WNBL (automatically notable) who do not yet have
articles.  His program involves having a database, firefox and grease
monkey attachment he's made.  I believe a few of the stubs he's made this
way have been taken to DYK.  Details of what he's doing can be found at
http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/Newsletter/February_2012/Contents/Australia_and_New_Zealand_report#Dictionary_of_New_Zealand_Biography,
http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/Newsletter/January_2012/Contents/Australia_and_New_Zealand_report#New_Zealand.

-- 
twitter: purplepopple
blog: ozziesport.com
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


Re: [Gendergap] List of lists of women

2012-02-12 Thread John Vandenberg
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 3:44 AM, emijrp emi...@gmail.com wrote:
 Yes, that is a possible approach John. But I was speaking about comparing
 all the biographies between different Wikipedias and discover missing
 females bios in each one.

Ah, thanks for clarifying what you meant.  Sorry I didnt understand
the first time.
That would be quite easy to do.

It would be very cool if the cat scan tools allowed us to ask for pages that
1. are in category fr:Category:Femme, and
2. do not have any interwikis

 By the way, I'm not interested any more in developing tools or statistics
 for this movement. I recently discovered that WikiWomenCamp[1] is going to
 exclude men from participating. I unsubscribe from this mailing list. Good
 luck.

I hope you will reconsider that emijrp.
You have been a source of inspiration to me and many others.

-- 
John Vandenberg

___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


Re: [Gendergap] List of lists of women

2012-02-11 Thread Risker
On 8 February 2012 10:50, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com wrote:

  Hi everyone,

 A few of us came together on the WikiWomen's History Month page to create
 a List of Lists of Women on English Wikipedia. Plenty of red links
 throughout the lists included, and yes everything is covered involving
 women! Even women pirates...

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_lists_of_women

 I know we'd love to see a similar collection in other languages, and use
 them as tools for figuring out what other lists need to be created, but
 also what articles need to be made.

 Also, please take a look at our English WikiWomen's History Page:
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiWomen's_History_Month

 We have more events that have been added, so please get involved, online
 or offline!  There are also discussions on the talk page.

 Looking forward to seeing some great things happen in March,

 Sarah



Hi Sarah -

Interesting idea, it's interesting to see how many of those lists exist.
Suggest that you move this page to [[Index of lists of notable women]] to
keep it in line with our standard naming conventions:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:LIST#Types_of_lists

I do think the inclusion of the word notable is important here.  The
lists aren't just of women, they're of women who are notable enough to
qualify for a Wikipedia article - which is a pretty low bar, as anyone
who's ever tried to get some mess deleted already knows!

Risker/Anne
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


Re: [Gendergap] List of lists of women

2012-02-11 Thread Carol Moore DC

On 2/11/2012 12:35 PM, Risker wrote:



I do think the inclusion of the word notable is important here.  The 
lists aren't just of women, they're of women who are notable enough to 
qualify for a Wikipedia article - which is a pretty low bar, as anyone 
who's ever tried to get some mess deleted already knows!


Risker/Anne
Unless it's a bio of someone enough editors want to get rid of for some 
prejudicial reasons, even if it's got lots of WP:RS.  Then they claim, 
oh, it doesn't matter if the person has been quoted or referred to 10 
times by the top newspapers in the country, the articles weren't ABOUT 
the person. So they aren't REALLY notable.


That's why it would be nice to know that Admins are truly neutral and 
objective, but that's not always true either. ;-(


CM in DC

___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


Re: [Gendergap] List of lists of women

2012-02-11 Thread Risker
On 11 February 2012 13:05, Carol Moore DC carolmoor...@verizon.net wrote:

 On 2/11/2012 12:35 PM, Risker wrote:


 

 I do think the inclusion of the word notable is important here.  The
 lists aren't just of women, they're of women who are notable enough to
 qualify for a Wikipedia article - which is a pretty low bar, as anyone
 who's ever tried to get some mess deleted already knows!

 Risker/Anne

 Unless it's a bio of someone enough editors want to get rid of for some
 prejudicial reasons, even if it's got lots of WP:RS.  Then they claim, oh,
 it doesn't matter if the person has been quoted or referred to 10 times by
 the top newspapers in the country, the articles weren't ABOUT the person.
 So they aren't REALLY notable.

 That's why it would be nice to know that Admins are truly neutral and
 objective, but that's not always true either. ;-(



While I sympathize with your position -  I can think of some articles about
notable people that got deleted, too - the role of the administrator in
closing deletion discussions remains the assessment and activation of the
policy-based consensus during the discussion, not the administrator's
personal preference.

There are also some biographical articles that are so poorly and
non-neutrally written that I wish we had a deletion category of do over:
that is, there's enough notability for the subject to have an article, but
the article we have is so bad that it's worse than if we had nothing.  One
of the areas I've seen that, in particular, is with scientists, and oddly
it seems to affect biographies of women scientists disproportionately.
Usually, it has to do with coatracking of irrelevant issues that serve to
demonize the subject and question the value of her scientific career.

Nonetheless, this is going off topic...sorry!

Risker/Anne
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


[Gendergap] List of lists of women

2012-02-08 Thread Sarah Stierch

Hi everyone,

A few of us came together on the WikiWomen's History Month page to 
create a List of Lists of Women on English Wikipedia. Plenty of red 
links throughout the lists included, and yes everything is covered 
involving women! Even women pirates...


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_lists_of_women

I know we'd love to see a similar collection in other languages, and use 
them as tools for figuring out what other lists need to be created, but 
also what articles need to be made.


Also, please take a look at our English WikiWomen's History Page: 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiWomen's_History_Month


We have more events that have been added, so please get involved, online 
or offline!  There are also discussions on the talk page.


Looking forward to seeing some great things happen in March,

Sarah

--
*Sarah Stierch*
*/Wikimedia Foundation Community Fellow/*
Support the sharing of free knowledge around the world: donate today 
https://donate.wikimedia.org/
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


Re: [Gendergap] List of lists of women

2012-02-08 Thread emijrp
It is a good work Sarah. But I don't understand why those lists where women
are separated from men are needed. I think that the only reason is that
there are persons who would need to read only about female chessplayers,
female ..., etc. But in the same fashion, there are persons who need to
read only about male chessplayers.

We can see as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Lists_of_men is less
populated than http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Lists_of_women Probably
you would say that the male version of that lists are the regular one.
But we can see that the female astronauts that are included here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_female_astronauts are also here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_astronauts_by_name (see ♀ symbol), but
there is no a List of male astronauts. If we are going to take this
approach, we have to start lists for both gender, separated and joined.

By the way, I'm interested in searching for missing female biographies
comparing Wikipedia biographical corpora in an automated way and make some
lists of red links. I will think about that.

2012/2/8 Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com

  Hi everyone,

 A few of us came together on the WikiWomen's History Month page to create
 a List of Lists of Women on English Wikipedia. Plenty of red links
 throughout the lists included, and yes everything is covered involving
 women! Even women pirates...

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_lists_of_women

 I know we'd love to see a similar collection in other languages, and use
 them as tools for figuring out what other lists need to be created, but
 also what articles need to be made.

 Also, please take a look at our English WikiWomen's History Page:
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiWomen's_History_Month

 We have more events that have been added, so please get involved, online
 or offline!  There are also discussions on the talk page.

 Looking forward to seeing some great things happen in March,

 Sarah

 --
 *Sarah Stierch*
 *Wikimedia Foundation Community Fellow*
 Support the sharing of free knowledge around the world: donate 
 todayhttps://donate.wikimedia.org/
 

 ___
 Gendergap mailing list
 Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


Re: [Gendergap] List of lists of women

2012-02-08 Thread Valerie Aurora
I think this is a great idea.  Since research has shone that women's
biographies are proportionately underrepresented on Wikipedia, lists
of women in particular areas are a useful tool for people interested
in writing biographies of women to fill in the gaps.  It's also a
great place to start for new editors (and we all want new editors!).

Someday these lists won't be necessary, I hope.  But until then they
are useful and fun as well.

-VAL

On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 8:44 AM, emijrp emi...@gmail.com wrote:
 It is a good work Sarah. But I don't understand why those lists where women
 are separated from men are needed. I think that the only reason is that
 there are persons who would need to read only about female chessplayers,
 female ..., etc. But in the same fashion, there are persons who need to
 read only about male chessplayers.

 We can see as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Lists_of_men is less
 populated than http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Lists_of_women Probably
 you would say that the male version of that lists are the regular one.
 But we can see that the female astronauts that are included here
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_female_astronauts are also
 here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_astronauts_by_name (see ♀ symbol),
 but there is no a List of male astronauts. If we are going to take this
 approach, we have to start lists for both gender, separated and joined.

 By the way, I'm interested in searching for missing female biographies
 comparing Wikipedia biographical corpora in an automated way and make some
 lists of red links. I will think about that.

 2012/2/8 Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com

 Hi everyone,

 A few of us came together on the WikiWomen's History Month page to create
 a List of Lists of Women on English Wikipedia. Plenty of red links
 throughout the lists included, and yes everything is covered involving
 women! Even women pirates...

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_lists_of_women

 I know we'd love to see a similar collection in other languages, and use
 them as tools for figuring out what other lists need to be created, but also
 what articles need to be made.

 Also, please take a look at our English WikiWomen's History Page:
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiWomen's_History_Month

 We have more events that have been added, so please get involved, online
 or offline!  There are also discussions on the talk page.

 Looking forward to seeing some great things happen in March,

 Sarah

 --
 Sarah Stierch
 Wikimedia Foundation Community Fellow
 Support the sharing of free knowledge around the world: donate today

 ___
 Gendergap mailing list
 Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap



 ___
 Gendergap mailing list
 Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap


___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap