[jira] Created: (INCUBATOR-58) Sync whoweare.html with its source file

[Bertrand Delacretaz (JIRA)]

Sync whoweare.html with its source file
---

 Key: INCUBATOR-58
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-58
 Project: Incubator
  Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Bertrand Delacretaz


http://incubator.apache.org/whoweare.html is out of sync with the 
committee-info.txt source file.

I'll update it, and change the order of names to use the same sort as in 
committee-info.txt (by first name), to make it easier to compare them.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[jira] Commented: (INCUBATOR-58) Sync whoweare.html with its source file

[Bertrand Delacretaz (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-58?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12489331
 ] 

Bertrand Delacretaz commented on INCUBATOR-58:
--

Here are the diffs on the sorted list of names, showing what has changed in 
revision 529518.

The removal of Roy and Stefano looks ok according to these svn logs of 
committee-info.txt:

Incubator PMC -= Roy T. Fielding 31JAN2007

r10368 | geirm | 2007-02-19 14:43:02 +0100 (Mon, 19 Feb 2007) | 2 lines

Incubator PMC -= Stefano Mazzocchi

r9644 | coar | 2006-11-13 18:35:43 +0100 (Mon, 13 Nov 2006) | 1 line

here are the diffs:
2a3
> Antoine Lévy-Lambert
5a7
> Bertrand Delacrétaz
18a21
> Eddie O'Neil
21a25
> Gianugo Rabellino
26a31
> Jason van Zyl   
28a34
> Jukka Zitting
33a40
> Martin van den Bemt
34a42
> Niclas Hedhman
40,41c48,49
< Robert Burrell Donkin 
< Roy T. Fielding
---
> Phil Steitz 
> Robert Burrel Donkin
44c52,53
< Stefano Mazzocchi 
---
> Stefan Bodewig   
> Stephane Bailliez


I don't seem to have the Jira karma to close this issue, can someone do it?


> Sync whoweare.html with its source file
> ---
>
> Key: INCUBATOR-58
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-58
> Project: Incubator
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Bertrand Delacretaz
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/whoweare.html is out of sync with the 
> committee-info.txt source file.
> I'll update it, and change the order of names to use the same sort as in 
> committee-info.txt (by first name), to make it easier to compare them.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://incubator.apache.org/whoweare.html (soon) updated, please cross-check (was: INCUBATOR-58...)

[Bertrand Delacretaz]

The list of IPMC members in whoweare.html was out of date, I have
synced it with the committee-info.txt, please cross-check:

 http://incubator.apache.org/whoweare.html
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-58

I have just updated the file on people.apache.org, so it might take a
few hours before whoweare.html is updated on the web. If the third
name in the list is not "Antoine Lévy-Lambert", it's not the latest
version yet.

-Bertrand

[VOTE] Publish the Woden M7a release

[John Kaputin (gmail)]

The Woden incubator project is developing a WSDL 2.0 processor in
conjunction with efforts of the W3C to deliver the new WSDL
2.0specification. The Woden project team would like to ask the
Incubator PMC
for approval to publish the Woden Milestone 7a release to support the
upcoming Apache WS Axis2 1.2 release.  Could Incubator PMC members please
vote by Friday 20th April.

Woden M7a is an incremental release of Woden M7 which was released on 19th
February 2007. M7a adds to M7 two fixes delivered by JIRAs:
* WODEN-153 Use the new W3C WSDL 2.0 namespaces.
* WODEN-154 A fix to the URI Resolver.

The Woden M7a release files are at:
http://people.apache.org/~jkaputin/woden/milestones/1.0M7a-incubating/

This build is based on revision 529170 at
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/woden/branches/M7a/

The results of the vote from the woden-dev and WS general lists were:
Davanum Srinivas +1 (WSPMC, IPMC)
Aleksander Slominski +1 (WSPMC)
Jeremy Hughes +1 (WSPMC)
Ant Elder +1 (WSPMC)
Graham Turrell +1
John Kaputin +1

regards,
John Kaputin.

Re: [RESULT] Add Tomas Restrepo as a Qpid Committer

[Carl Trieloff]

Please could a IPMC member help us with the IPMC 3rd vote for this committer

Carl.



Paul Fremantle wrote:

+1 from me

Paul

On 4/10/07, Cliff Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On 3/15/07, Marnie McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
> This vote closed on Tuesday night and the result is as follows:
>
> Votes Cast:
>
> 9+
> 0-
>
> Thus, Tomas Restrepo should now be created as a committer on the Qpid
> project.

Although this vote closed several weeks ago, I'm adding my +1 as one
of the mentors and a member of the Incubator PMC.

Cliff







-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [RESULT] Add Rupert Smith as a Qpid Committer

[Carl Trieloff]

Please could a IPMC member help us with the IPMC 3rd vote for this committer

Carl.


Paul Fremantle wrote:

+1 from me.

Paul

On 4/10/07, Cliff Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On 3/15/07, Marnie McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
> This vote closed on Tuesday night and the result is as follows:
>
> Votes Cast:
>
> 9+
> 0-
>
> Thus, Rupert Smith should now be created as a committer on the Qpid 
project.


Although this vote closed several weeks ago, I'm adding my +1 as the
mentor and member of the Incubator PMC.

Cliff







-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [RESULT] Add Kevin Smith as a Qpid Committer

[Carl Trieloff]

Please could a IPMC member help us with the IPMC 3rd vote for this committer

Carl.


Paul Fremantle wrote:

+1 from me.

Paul

On 4/10/07, Cliff Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On 3/15/07, Marnie McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
> This vote closed on Tuesday night and the result is as follows:
>
> Votes Cast:
>
> 6+
> 0-
>
> Thus, Kevin Smith should now be created as a committer on the Qpid 
project.


Although this vote closed several weeks ago, I'm adding my +1 as the
mentor and member of the Incubator PMC.

Cliff







-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [RESULT] Add Rupert Smith as a Qpid Committer

[William A. Rowe, Jr.]

Carl Trieloff wrote:
> 
> Please could a IPMC member help us with the IPMC 3rd vote for this
> committer

I presume the Qpid PPMC raised no objections.  +1, welcome Rupert.

Bill

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [RESULT] Add Kevin Smith as a Qpid Committer

[William A. Rowe, Jr.]

Carl Trieloff wrote:
> 
> Please could a IPMC member help us with the IPMC 3rd vote for this
> committer

I presume the Qpid PPMC raised no objections.  +1, welcome Kevin.

Bill

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [RESULT] Add Tomas Restrepo as a Qpid Committer

[William A. Rowe, Jr.]

Carl Trieloff wrote:
> 
> 
> Please could a IPMC member help us with the IPMC 3rd vote for this
> committer


I presume the Qpid PPMC raised no objections.  +1, welcome Tomas.

Bill

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [VOTE] [Retry] Approve the release of Apache Lucene.Net 2.0 build 004 incubating

[George Aroush]

Hi Folks,

Please help us to get our first official Lucene.Net release out the door.
I'm still waiting on one more +1 vote.  The review has been very, VERY slow
as well as comments.  Only 3 folks actually reviewed the release and gave
their votes.  What can I do, beside sending reminders like this, to speed
this up?  Please see email thread below for details.

Regards,

-- George Aroush


> -Original Message-
> From: George Aroush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 9:29 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] [Retry] Approve the release of Apache 
> Lucene.Net 2.0 build 004 incubating
> 
> Hi Niclas,
> 
> Thanks for your +1 vote, but most of all for your time.
> 
> This now gives me:
> 
> +1 from Erik Hatcher
> +1 from Niclas Hedhman
> +0 from Robert Burrell Donkin
> 
> I still need 1 more +1 to get this release out.  Can at least 
> one other PMC member review this release please?
> 
> > Personally, I think the project is suffering from a chicken-egg 
> > problem.
> 
> This is true.  Recently, there has been some interest from 
> folks who want to get on and start contributing.  Lets hope 
> this holds.  The good bit is that there is a good user base 
> community and Lucene.Net is not only recognized but is being 
> used in production out in the field.  An official release, 
> more publicity should help, *AND* we need to start thinking 
> about how ASF can help too should give Lucene.Net a new 
> start.  ASF folks voting on a release, in a timely fashion, 
> is a good start.
> 
> > I am also pleased to see that the many remarks in the first 
> round has 
> > been attended to promptly.
> > However, there are 2 more subsystems in "contrib/" and the 
> first file 
> > I checked "Similarity.Net/AssemblyInfo.cs" didn't have the Apache 
> > License header, but others did. I did not
> 
> "AssemblyInfo.cs" is an auto generated file; we discussed 
> those in first release attempt.
> 
> > perform an exhaustive check. I would be interested to here how come 
> > "so much" gets added between two reviews of a release 2.0.
> 
> The only changes between build 4 and build 3, is:
> 1) Build 4 added the correct copy right header and files
> 2) Build 4 added 1 new ported project to "contrib", 
> Similarity.Net.  This wasn't ready in time for the first vote 
> but was for the second.
> 
> > But I think those are minor enough to get my +1 for this release.
> 
> Much appreciated; thanks.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> -- George
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] [Retry] Approve the release of Apache Lucene.Net 2.0 build 004 incubating

[Ted Husted]

+1 (binding)

I'll bring this up on the iBATIS.NET list and Spring.NET lists, which
we also use.

-Ted.

On 4/17/07, George Aroush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hi Folks,

Please help us to get our first official Lucene.Net release out the door.
I'm still waiting on one more +1 vote.  The review has been very, VERY slow
as well as comments.  Only 3 folks actually reviewed the release and gave
their votes.  What can I do, beside sending reminders like this, to speed
this up?  Please see email thread below for details.

Regards,

-- George Aroush


> -Original Message-
> From: George Aroush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 9:29 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] [Retry] Approve the release of Apache
> Lucene.Net 2.0 build 004 incubating
>
> Hi Niclas,
>
> Thanks for your +1 vote, but most of all for your time.
>
> This now gives me:
>
> +1 from Erik Hatcher
> +1 from Niclas Hedhman
> +0 from Robert Burrell Donkin
>
> I still need 1 more +1 to get this release out.  Can at least
> one other PMC member review this release please?
>
> > Personally, I think the project is suffering from a chicken-egg
> > problem.
>
> This is true.  Recently, there has been some interest from
> folks who want to get on and start contributing.  Lets hope
> this holds.  The good bit is that there is a good user base
> community and Lucene.Net is not only recognized but is being
> used in production out in the field.  An official release,
> more publicity should help, *AND* we need to start thinking
> about how ASF can help too should give Lucene.Net a new
> start.  ASF folks voting on a release, in a timely fashion,
> is a good start.
>
> > I am also pleased to see that the many remarks in the first
> round has
> > been attended to promptly.
> > However, there are 2 more subsystems in "contrib/" and the
> first file
> > I checked "Similarity.Net/AssemblyInfo.cs" didn't have the Apache
> > License header, but others did. I did not
>
> "AssemblyInfo.cs" is an auto generated file; we discussed
> those in first release attempt.
>
> > perform an exhaustive check. I would be interested to here how come
> > "so much" gets added between two reviews of a release 2.0.
>
> The only changes between build 4 and build 3, is:
> 1) Build 4 added the correct copy right header and files
> 2) Build 4 added 1 new ported project to "contrib",
> Similarity.Net.  This wasn't ready in time for the first vote
> but was for the second.
>
> > But I think those are minor enough to get my +1 for this release.
>
> Much appreciated; thanks.
>
> Regards,
>
> -- George
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





--
HTH, Ted 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Approve changing "escalation" to "graduation" in Incubator Policy

[J Aaron Farr]

+1

Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> [ ] +1 approve the patch to change "escalation" to "graduation" in
> Incubator Policy
>
> [ ] -1 don't approve the patch
>
> I've attached the JIRA reference [1]  and formatted html page [2] so
> you don't need to apply the patch to see what it will do. There are
> broken links because the page is not in its preferred location but
> the text is complete.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-53
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12355574/
> Incubation_Policy.html
>
> Craig Russell
> DB PMC, OpenJPA PPMC
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://db.apache.org/jdo
>
>

-- 
  jaaron

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]