[VOTE] Accept Composer in the Incubator
Hi, The proposal for Composer has been drafted here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ComposerProposal As mentioned previously, both containers are heavily used, both have always lived as open source projects. Plexus has 17 Apache committers, Pico has 4 so most of the participants are already familiar with projects here. [ ] +1 Accept Composer project for incubation [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason : Thanks, Jason -- Jason van Zyl Founder, Apache Maven jason at sonatype dot com -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Accept Composer in the Incubator
+1 On 22/10/2007, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, The proposal for Composer has been drafted here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ComposerProposal As mentioned previously, both containers are heavily used, both have always lived as open source projects. Plexus has 17 Apache committers, Pico has 4 so most of the participants are already familiar with projects here. [ ] +1 Accept Composer project for incubation [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason : Thanks, Jason -- Jason van Zyl Founder, Apache Maven jason at sonatype dot com -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- James --- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://open.iona.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Accept Composer in the Incubator
[X ] +1 Accept Composer project for incubation -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Accept Composer in the Incubator
Hi, [x] +1 Accept Composer project for incubation BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Accept Composer in the Incubator
[x] +1 Accept Composer project for incubation (non-binding) On 10/22/07, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, [x] +1 Accept Composer project for incubation BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Accept Composer in the Incubator
+1 On 10/22/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, The proposal for Composer has been drafted here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ComposerProposal As mentioned previously, both containers are heavily used, both have always lived as open source projects. Plexus has 17 Apache committers, Pico has 4 so most of the participants are already familiar with projects here. [ ] +1 Accept Composer project for incubation [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason : Thanks, Jason -- Jason van Zyl Founder, Apache Maven jason at sonatype dot com -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta4 is released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta4/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Accept Composer in the Incubator
+1. Really happy to see this happen guys; I wish you all the best and I'm gonna try and track progress even if there's no chance I can find time to actually contribute... I hope the relative lack of controversy around this so far is carried all the way through successful graduation...looking at the list of participants I imagine incubation might go quite quickly :-) On Oct 22, 2007, at 9:13 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: The proposal for Composer has been drafted here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ComposerProposal As mentioned previously, both containers are heavily used, both have always lived as open source projects. Plexus has 17 Apache committers, Pico has 4 so most of the participants are already familiar with projects here. [ ] +1 Accept Composer project for incubation [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason : cheers, Leo Simons -- http://www.leosimons.com/blog/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[jira] Resolved: (INCUBATOR-62) [policy] State distribution directory
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-62?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Burrell Donkin resolved INCUBATOR-62. Resolution: Fixed APPROVAL: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200710.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] [policy] State distribution directory - Key: INCUBATOR-62 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-62 Project: Incubator Issue Type: Improvement Components: site Reporter: Robert Burrell Donkin Assignee: Robert Burrell Donkin Attachments: distribution(6).patch Infrastructure requires that all releases are distributed through www.apache.org/dist. We do not state this explicitly in policy. This has resulted in confusion over the right location for releases. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Tuscany as a top level project
For the record, I am voting -1 on graduation. I do not feel that Tuscany has sufficient real diversity, at this time, for graduation. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Tuscany as a top level project
On Oct 20, 2007, at 2:58 AM, Paul Fremantle wrote: Noel Wouldn't the community be healthier if it focused some effort on bringing in independent committers? Its my understanding that the project is very focussed on encouraging new committers and that this is having results. In which case, I would guess that diversity will be better improved in a handful of months... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Accept Composer in the Incubator
[x] +1 Accept Composer project for incubation On 10/22/07, Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1. Really happy to see this happen guys; I wish you all the best and I'm gonna try and track progress even if there's no chance I can find time to actually contribute... I hope the relative lack of controversy around this so far is carried all the way through successful graduation...looking at the list of participants I imagine incubation might go quite quickly :-) On Oct 22, 2007, at 9:13 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: The proposal for Composer has been drafted here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ComposerProposal As mentioned previously, both containers are heavily used, both have always lived as open source projects. Plexus has 17 Apache committers, Pico has 4 so most of the participants are already familiar with projects here. [ ] +1 Accept Composer project for incubation [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason : cheers, Leo Simons -- http://www.leosimons.com/blog/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Tuscany as a top level project
Thanks for voting. I think the PPMC needs this sort of concrete feedback. Paul On 10/22/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 20, 2007, at 2:58 AM, Paul Fremantle wrote: Noel Wouldn't the community be healthier if it focused some effort on bringing in independent committers? Its my understanding that the project is very focussed on encouraging new committers and that this is having results. In which case, I would guess that diversity will be better improved in a handful of months... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Paul Fremantle Co-Founder and VP of Technical Sales, WSO2 OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oxygenating the Web Service Platform, www.wso2.com
Re: [VOTE] Accept Composer in the Incubator
On 10/22/07, Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1. +1 Really happy to see this happen guys; I wish you all the best +1 - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Tuscany as a top level project
On 10/22/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 20, 2007, at 2:58 AM, Paul Fremantle wrote: Noel Wouldn't the community be healthier if it focused some effort on bringing in independent committers? Its my understanding that the project is very focussed on encouraging new committers and that this is having results. In which case, I would guess that diversity will be better improved in a handful of months... Thanks for your vote. Could you just clarify what you would consider a good level of diversity for Tuscany? I think it would be very beneficial to the project to know what they're shooting for and at which point they can consider bringing this topic back to the IPMC. Thanks, Matthieu - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Graduate Tuscany as a top level project
I would refer people to the Re: Graduation: how do we check three or more independent committers ? thread, and message ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Accept Composer in the Incubator
+1 Good luck, Craig On Oct 22, 2007, at 12:13 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: Hi, The proposal for Composer has been drafted here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ComposerProposal As mentioned previously, both containers are heavily used, both have always lived as open source projects. Plexus has 17 Apache committers, Pico has 4 so most of the participants are already familiar with projects here. [ ] +1 Accept Composer project for incubation [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason : Thanks, Jason -- Jason van Zyl Founder, Apache Maven jason at sonatype dot com -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: [VOTE] Accept Composer in the Incubator
On Oct 22, 2007, at 12:13 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: Plexus has 17 Apache committers, Pico has 4 so most of the participants are already familiar with projects here. But not all favorably it appears... It is also worth noting that Paul got drunk with Aslak to start PicoContainer on the day a world class coder was effectively expelled from Apache. He voted against that action and won't go into details, but believes that it was wrong. [ ] +1 Accept Composer project for incubation [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason : 0 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Oracle contribution to Apache MyFaces
It's been more than the 72 hours required, so I'll go ahead and close this thread and let the project know that the code has been cleared for import. regards, -Scott Scott O'Bryan wrote: Oops, I forgot to include the links below. Sorry for the inconvenience. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1664 [2] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/jsr-301-ri.html [3] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-dev/200710.mbox/ajax/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Please see also this mail: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200707.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] this group agreed on a straightforward software grant :-) -M On 10/18/07, Scott O'Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oracle has contributed the JSF Portlet Bridge (JSR-301) code to Apache MyFaces: - The ASF secretary has recorded the software grant. - The code was uploaded to Jira issue MYFACES-1664.[1] - The ip clearance form was added to the Incubator site.[2] - The vote to accept it passed. [3] Please let me know of any issues. Regards, -Scott O'Bryan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Assigning issues in JIRA?
Hi Janne, I'm copying the incubator general list for feedback from others with more experience in ICLA vs. Software Grant... On Oct 22, 2007, at 10:47 AM, Janne Jalkanen wrote: Perhaps you can recap the status of the code. Was most of the code written by a small number of people? Were there a large number of substantial contributors at some point? Either a Software Grant or an ICLA would be appropriate once we understand the nature of the contributions. This reflects the current situation pretty accurately. I've contacted everyone, so I know how to find them. http://www.jspwiki.org/wiki/ApacheRelicensing If they don't want to sign an ICLA, a software grant is still sufficient? Yes. An ICLA covers current and future contributions, but if all they want is to grant rights and not contribute further, a Software Grant is fine. If they want to contribute in future, they can always submit an ICLA later. Craig /Janne Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: [VOTE] Accept Composer in the Incubator
On 22 Oct 07, at 10:36 AM 22 Oct 07, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Oct 22, 2007, at 12:13 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: Plexus has 17 Apache committers, Pico has 4 so most of the participants are already familiar with projects here. But not all favorably it appears... I don't think anyone was particularly happy about the outcome of the Avalon project, that quote is probably 4 years old now, and no one is obliged to like everything at Apache. There are lots of things I like, and there are things I don't like. The overriding obligation and responsibility of anyone who has a project here, or wants to put one here, is to make an earnest attempt to improve Apache. There is no one on the list of people in the proposal who thinks otherwise. Was there a particular response you were trying to illicit with that quote? Paul is on vacation, getting drunk, but I'm sure he would respond in the same fashion. I don't think anyone was particularly happy with the outcome of Avalon. Such is life, life goes on, and this is where we are trying to reintegrate this stuff back into Apache. It is also worth noting that Paul got drunk with Aslak to start PicoContainer on the day a world class coder was effectively expelled from Apache. He voted against that action and won't go into details, but believes that it was wrong. [ ] +1 Accept Composer project for incubation [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason : 0 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, Jason -- Jason van Zyl Founder, Apache Maven jason at sonatype dot com -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Accept Composer in the Incubator
[ x ] +1 Accept Composer project for incubation Eelco - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Accept Composer in the Incubator
On 22 Oct 07, at 2:14 AM 22 Oct 07, Leo Simons wrote: +1. Really happy to see this happen guys; I wish you all the best and I'm gonna try and track progress even if there's no chance I can find time to actually contribute... I hope the relative lack of controversy around this so far is carried all the way through successful graduation...looking at the list of participants I imagine incubation might go quite quickly :-) Yes, I really see this as IP vetting, and planning on how to migrate users. There's a lot of code, and we have a fair number of users. The complete merger of the code will probably take some time, and it's not necessary to do that in the incubator as it will take quite a while to use a merged container in Maven. I imagine separate releases of the containers will happen for a while as we release merged versions for people to try. I think we'll be out of the incubator very quickly relative to projects coming in with little or no open source experience. On Oct 22, 2007, at 9:13 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: The proposal for Composer has been drafted here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ComposerProposal As mentioned previously, both containers are heavily used, both have always lived as open source projects. Plexus has 17 Apache committers, Pico has 4 so most of the participants are already familiar with projects here. [ ] +1 Accept Composer project for incubation [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason : cheers, Leo Simons -- http://www.leosimons.com/blog/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, Jason -- Jason van Zyl Founder, Apache Maven jason at sonatype dot com -- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[IP CLEARANCE] Jon Stevens contribution to Apache Torque
Jon Stevens has contributed the Village code to Apache Torque: - The ASF secretary has recorded the software grant. - The code was uploaded to http://people.apache.org/~seade/village/. - The ip clearance form was added to the Incubator site. [1] - The vote to accept it on torque-dev passed. [2] Please let me know of any issues you spot. Thanks, Scott [1] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/torque-village-contribution.html [2] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-torque-dev/200710.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[IP CLEARANCE] Jon Stevens contribution to Apache Torque (resend with cc: torque-dev)
Jon Stevens has contributed the Village code to Apache Torque: - The ASF secretary has recorded the software grant. - The code was uploaded to http://people.apache.org/~seade/village/. - The ip clearance form was added to the Incubator site. [1] - The vote to accept it on torque-dev passed. [2] Please let me know of any issues you spot. Thanks, Scott [1] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/torque-village-contribution.html [2] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-torque-dev/200710.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Accept Composer in the Incubator
[X ] +1 Accept Composer project for incubation Good luck. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
