Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation?
+1, I am on board On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Todd Carrico todd.carr...@match.comwrote: +1 tc Hey All, This is the first step for graduation for the Apache Lucene.Net project (incubating of course..). We're taking a vote for the Lucene.Net community to see if the community is ready to govern itself as a top level project. Here is a short list of our accomplishments which I believe make us ready for graduation: - Released 2.9.4 - Released 2.9.4g (Generics version) - created a new website, with a new logo (a 99designs contest gracious supported by stackoverflow) - Added two new committers bringing our total to 9. - Preparing for 3.0.3 Release within the next couple of weeks - Started work on 3.5 release. This is the process we will follow: - Community vote (this email). All votes count, there is no non-binding / binding status for this - We will propose a resolution for review ( https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Graduation+-+Res olution+Template ) - We will call a vote on the resolution in general @ incubator - A Board resolution will be submitted. As a community, if you would please vote: [1] Ready for graduation [-1] Not ready because... I know I speak for all the developers on this project, we appreciate (and will continue to appreciate) everyone's contributions via the mailing list and jira. ~Prescott - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.orgjavascript:; For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.orgjavascript:; -- -- Faizan Javed, Ph.D., LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/faizanjaved
Re: What does 'project sponsorship' mean now?
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: ...my 2 cents would be to make it optional - keep it where theres a synergy and interest from a real project. Where it doesn't really mean anything is when the incubator PMC is the sponsor and IMO we may as well drop that Makes sense...saying that in general podlings aren't sponsored by a PMC would better match our current reality. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[ANN] Committer School for people who want to become Maven Committers
Hi everyone, I just posted on my blog about an idea to get some more committers involved in the Maven project: http://javaadventure.blogspot.ie/2012/07/do-you-want-to-become-maven-committer.html If you are interested sign up. Also please consider tweeting, google+ing, facebooking, etc so we can get the word out. -Stephen
Re: DirectMemory status (Was: Shepherding: chukwa, mesos, directmemory)
Hi, On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 4:13 AM, Tim Williams william...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Does that (and my classification as ready to graduate) sound like an accurate assessment of DirectMemory status? I suppose. Though, it's not clear why we're answering that question on general@ instead of letting the mentors run through the graduation guide with the community? This list is chatty though, so perhaps I missed something? I'm just verifying that I understood the report correctly. We're providing a summary of the overall status of the Incubator in our report to the board, and for that I need a rough indication of where each podling stands in terms of progress towards graduation. The intention is certainly not interfere with the work mentors are doing as long as everything's fine, just to verify that everything indeed is fine. FWIW, this shepherd thing is starting to feel like [duplicative] middle-management. I'd strongly encourage a more passive board-style role (e.g. stepping in only when a problem exists). Yes, the shepherding model indeed is sort of middle-management that ideally wouldn't be needed. Unfortunately with lots of absent mentors and podlings that were stuck in a limbo, there was a clear need to do something about the situation. That's why there's recently been a concentrated effort to review podling reports and status in much more detail and provide feedback where needed. Once we have such problems covered, we may well be able to fall back to a more passive mode of operation. In this case I just wanted to confirm that my understanding of the project status based on the report and other available information was correct. It seems like the mentors and the project in general are doing all the right things, so I see no need to interfere further. Apologies if my message implied otherwise. BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation?
+1, Job well done. -Original Message- From: Allan, Brad (Wokingham) Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 8:15 AM To: 'lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org' Cc: 'general@incubator.apache.org' ; 'lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org' Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation? +1 (Sent from my Blackberry device) Brad Allan Development Lead Risk Compliance Fiserv Office: +44 (0) 845 013 1137 Mobile: +44 (0) 7866 720024 Fax: +44 (0) 845 013 1010 www.fiserv.com - Original Message - From: Faizan Javed [mailto:faizan.ja...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 10:17 PM To: lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org Cc: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org; lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation? +1, I am on board On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Todd Carrico todd.carr...@match.comwrote: +1 tc Hey All, This is the first step for graduation for the Apache Lucene.Net project (incubating of course..). We're taking a vote for the Lucene.Net community to see if the community is ready to govern itself as a top level project. Here is a short list of our accomplishments which I believe make us ready for graduation: - Released 2.9.4 - Released 2.9.4g (Generics version) - created a new website, with a new logo (a 99designs contest gracious supported by stackoverflow) - Added two new committers bringing our total to 9. - Preparing for 3.0.3 Release within the next couple of weeks - Started work on 3.5 release. This is the process we will follow: - Community vote (this email). All votes count, there is no non-binding / binding status for this - We will propose a resolution for review ( https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Graduation+-+Res olution+Template ) - We will call a vote on the resolution in general @ incubator - A Board resolution will be submitted. As a community, if you would please vote: [1] Ready for graduation [-1] Not ready because... I know I speak for all the developers on this project, we appreciate (and will continue to appreciate) everyone's contributions via the mailing list and jira. ~Prescott - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.orgjavascript:; For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.orgjavascript:; -- -- Faizan Javed, Ph.D., LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/faizanjaved CheckFree Solutions Limited (trading as Fiserv) Registered Office: Eversheds House, 70 Great Bridgewater Street, Manchester, M15 ES Registered in England: No. 2694333 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation?
+1 (Sent from my Blackberry device) Brad Allan Development Lead Risk Compliance Fiserv Office: +44 (0) 845 013 1137 Mobile: +44 (0) 7866 720024 Fax: +44 (0) 845 013 1010 www.fiserv.com - Original Message - From: Faizan Javed [mailto:faizan.ja...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 10:17 PM To: lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org Cc: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org; lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation? +1, I am on board On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Todd Carrico todd.carr...@match.comwrote: +1 tc Hey All, This is the first step for graduation for the Apache Lucene.Net project (incubating of course..). We're taking a vote for the Lucene.Net community to see if the community is ready to govern itself as a top level project. Here is a short list of our accomplishments which I believe make us ready for graduation: - Released 2.9.4 - Released 2.9.4g (Generics version) - created a new website, with a new logo (a 99designs contest gracious supported by stackoverflow) - Added two new committers bringing our total to 9. - Preparing for 3.0.3 Release within the next couple of weeks - Started work on 3.5 release. This is the process we will follow: - Community vote (this email). All votes count, there is no non-binding / binding status for this - We will propose a resolution for review ( https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Graduation+-+Res olution+Template ) - We will call a vote on the resolution in general @ incubator - A Board resolution will be submitted. As a community, if you would please vote: [1] Ready for graduation [-1] Not ready because... I know I speak for all the developers on this project, we appreciate (and will continue to appreciate) everyone's contributions via the mailing list and jira. ~Prescott - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.orgjavascript:; For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.orgjavascript:; -- -- Faizan Javed, Ph.D., LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/faizanjaved CheckFree Solutions Limited (trading as Fiserv) Registered Office: Eversheds House, 70 Great Bridgewater Street, Manchester, M15 ES Registered in England: No. 2694333 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] Apache Lucene.Net ready for graduation?
+1 tc Hey All, This is the first step for graduation for the Apache Lucene.Net project (incubating of course..). We're taking a vote for the Lucene.Net community to see if the community is ready to govern itself as a top level project. Here is a short list of our accomplishments which I believe make us ready for graduation: - Released 2.9.4 - Released 2.9.4g (Generics version) - created a new website, with a new logo (a 99designs contest gracious supported by stackoverflow) - Added two new committers bringing our total to 9. - Preparing for 3.0.3 Release within the next couple of weeks - Started work on 3.5 release. This is the process we will follow: - Community vote (this email). All votes count, there is no non-binding / binding status for this - We will propose a resolution for review ( https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Graduation+-+Res olution+Template ) - We will call a vote on the resolution in general @ incubator - A Board resolution will be submitted. As a community, if you would please vote: [1] Ready for graduation [-1] Not ready because... I know I speak for all the developers on this project, we appreciate (and will continue to appreciate) everyone's contributions via the mailing list and jira. ~Prescott - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.orgjavascript:; For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.orgjavascript:; - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: JSPWiki status (Was: [Incubator Wiki] Update of July2012 by JuanPabloSantos)
Hi, On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez juanpablo.san...@gmail.com wrote: Regarding the binary dependencies. Wasn't the discussion on general@ more focused on (or raised because of) transitive dependencies which were brought into the build and not being AL-compatible? No, all the dependencies discussed were compliant with Apache policies. The problem was about having binaries included in the source archive. Also, the build is Ant based, so we need them to be there in order to be able to build. The proposed solution for this case was to put the dependencies in a separate -deps archive, that can be combined with the source release to make it buildable. The build script can also automatically download such separate binary dependencies. BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: DirectMemory status (Was: Shepherding: chukwa, mesos, directmemory)
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: ...the shepherding model indeed is sort of middle-management that ideally wouldn't be needed... FWIW, as a board member I find the summary that's been recently added to the Incubator reports very useful, it makes it much easier to concentrate on the important parts of the large Incubator report. There's also value IMO in podlings discussing their respective statuses on this list, as it makes them aware of other podling's issues and solutions, which rarely happened before. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[jira] [Created] (PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8) Establish whether Apache Stanbol is a suitable name
Fabian Christ created PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8: - Summary: Establish whether Apache Stanbol is a suitable name Key: PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8 Project: Podling Suitable Names Search Issue Type: Suitable Name Search Reporter: Fabian Christ We have to do some investigations to ensure that Apache Stanbol is a suitable name for a TLP. People should start searching on the Web and add their findings as comments. We should state: * Evidence of the degree of open source adoption for the proposed name. * Evidence of trademark registrations for the proposed name. * Evidence of the degree of branding usage of the proposed name on the world wide web. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
inadequate graduation requests being filed with infra
While the new move to push podlings towards graduation is something I'm happy to see, lately the quality of the tickets being filed with INFRA has hit new lows, bogging down the process considerably. I don't know if some docs have recently changed or need fixing, but the situation sucks for the sysadmins trying to complete this work in a timely fashion. Whether we need to go back to filing a single ticket containing all the necessary details or continue to break things down into subtickets does not concern me, but the lack of detail in these requests is strikingly bad and needs to be addressed by the IPMC. Thanks. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: inadequate graduation requests being filed with infra
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote: While the new move to push podlings towards graduation is something I'm happy to see, lately the quality of the tickets being filed with INFRA has hit new lows, bogging down the process considerably. I don't know if some docs have recently changed or need fixing, but the situation sucks for the sysadmins trying to complete this work in a timely fashion. Whether we need to go back to filing a single ticket containing all the necessary details or continue to break things down into subtickets does not concern me, but the lack of detail in these requests is strikingly bad and needs to be addressed by the IPMC. Thanks. Hi Joe, Can you point to a ticket [or tickets] from a graduating podling that got it right? Thanks, --tim - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: inadequate graduation requests being filed with infra
Shouldn't there already be such a representative ticket in the incubator docs? - Original Message - From: Tim Williams william...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org; Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com Cc: Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 10:26 AM Subject: Re: inadequate graduation requests being filed with infra On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote: While the new move to push podlings towards graduation is something I'm happy to see, lately the quality of the tickets being filed with INFRA has hit new lows, bogging down the process considerably. I don't know if some docs have recently changed or need fixing, but the situation sucks for the sysadmins trying to complete this work in a timely fashion. Whether we need to go back to filing a single ticket containing all the necessary details or continue to break things down into subtickets does not concern me, but the lack of detail in these requests is strikingly bad and needs to be addressed by the IPMC. Thanks. Hi Joe, Can you point to a ticket [or tickets] from a graduating podling that got it right? Thanks, --tim - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8) Establish whether Apache Stanbol is a suitable name
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13411594#comment-13411594 ] Encolpe DEGOUTE commented on PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8: - Stanbol Is already the name of a media egency : - http://www.facebook.com/StanbolAgency - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fil2Cdi-d2c It's too similar to 'Istanbul' and not famous enough for Bing (and Yahoo). Establish whether Apache Stanbol is a suitable name - Key: PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8 Project: Podling Suitable Names Search Issue Type: Suitable Name Search Reporter: Fabian Christ We have to do some investigations to ensure that Apache Stanbol is a suitable name for a TLP. People should start searching on the Web and add their findings as comments. We should state: * Evidence of the degree of open source adoption for the proposed name. * Evidence of trademark registrations for the proposed name. * Evidence of the degree of branding usage of the proposed name on the world wide web. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: inadequate graduation requests being filed with infra
The graduation docs look fine to me now that I've reread them. I guess we just need to raise awareness to follow them precisely when a podling has graduated. - Original Message - From: Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com To: Tim Williams william...@gmail.com; general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org Cc: Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 10:29 AM Subject: Re: inadequate graduation requests being filed with infra Shouldn't there already be such a representative ticket in the incubator docs? - Original Message - From: Tim Williams william...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org; Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com Cc: Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 10:26 AM Subject: Re: inadequate graduation requests being filed with infra On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote: While the new move to push podlings towards graduation is something I'm happy to see, lately the quality of the tickets being filed with INFRA has hit new lows, bogging down the process considerably. I don't know if some docs have recently changed or need fixing, but the situation sucks for the sysadmins trying to complete this work in a timely fashion. Whether we need to go back to filing a single ticket containing all the necessary details or continue to break things down into subtickets does not concern me, but the lack of detail in these requests is strikingly bad and needs to be addressed by the IPMC. Thanks. Hi Joe, Can you point to a ticket [or tickets] from a graduating podling that got it right? Thanks, --tim - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8) Establish whether Apache Stanbol is a suitable name
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13411604#comment-13411604 ] Sergio Fernández commented on PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8: -- The official web page of such media agency is http://stanbol.com/ Establish whether Apache Stanbol is a suitable name - Key: PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8 Project: Podling Suitable Names Search Issue Type: Suitable Name Search Reporter: Fabian Christ We have to do some investigations to ensure that Apache Stanbol is a suitable name for a TLP. People should start searching on the Web and add their findings as comments. We should state: * Evidence of the degree of open source adoption for the proposed name. * Evidence of trademark registrations for the proposed name. * Evidence of the degree of branding usage of the proposed name on the world wide web. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: inadequate graduation requests being filed with infra
The reason this is so annoying is that without all the details we have a hard time collaborating as sysadmins on the work required. So you want a CMS site? Well have your mailing lists moved yet? What about svn? etc. We provide enough services now that breaking out the Infra team into specialties makes sense, so no don't expect a single person to track all the required work in his/her head. Podlings, just do usa favor and fill out TLP request properly without us needing to prod you, thx. - Original Message - From: Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org; Tim Williams william...@gmail.com; Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com Cc: Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 10:52 AM Subject: Re: inadequate graduation requests being filed with infra T he graduation docs look fine to me now that I've reread them. I guess we just need to raise awareness to follow them precisely when a podling has graduated. - Original Message - From: Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com To: Tim Williams william...@gmail.com; general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org Cc: Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 10:29 AM Subject: Re: inadequate graduation requests being filed with infra Shouldn't there already be such a representative ticket in the incubator docs? - Original Message - From: Tim Williams william...@gmail.com To: general@incubator.apache.org; Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com Cc: Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 10:26 AM Subject: Re: inadequate graduation requests being filed with infra On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote: While the new move to push podlings towards graduation is something I'm happy to see, lately the quality of the tickets being filed with INFRA has hit new lows, bogging down the process considerably. I don't know if some docs have recently changed or need fixing, but the situation sucks for the sysadmins trying to complete this work in a timely fashion. Whether we need to go back to filing a single ticket containing all the necessary details or continue to break things down into subtickets does not concern me, but the lack of detail in these requests is strikingly bad and needs to be addressed by the IPMC. Thanks. Hi Joe, Can you point to a ticket [or tickets] from a graduating podling that got it right? Thanks, --tim - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8) Establish whether Apache Stanbol is a suitable name
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13411626#comment-13411626 ] Bertrand Delacretaz commented on PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8: - A media agency is sufficiently different from a software product that they can't be confused, I think it's fine to ignore that. Establish whether Apache Stanbol is a suitable name - Key: PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8 Project: Podling Suitable Names Search Issue Type: Suitable Name Search Reporter: Fabian Christ We have to do some investigations to ensure that Apache Stanbol is a suitable name for a TLP. People should start searching on the Web and add their findings as comments. We should state: * Evidence of the degree of open source adoption for the proposed name. * Evidence of trademark registrations for the proposed name. * Evidence of the degree of branding usage of the proposed name on the world wide web. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8) Establish whether Apache Stanbol is a suitable name
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13411653#comment-13411653 ] Encolpe DEGOUTE commented on PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8: - Propositions: - Seamen Techs - Endelea - Oriĥalko - Null-A - Gosseyn One evidence is that having a world pronounceable in english would help even if it's an alien world like for NGinX (engine X), Solr (solar) or twitter. The other evidence is that there's no rules to create an opensource project name. The community adoption would come will success stories in the favourite newspaper of your CEO and geek events around our favourite tool. We can take something that's sounds like semantic as Seamen Techs then decline the ocean theme for new modules naming convention. To give an exotic touch we can also use African like Endelea (Continue) or esperanto like Oriĥalko (Orichalcum). Create a naming convention is harder and the relation with semantic is less evident. We can use some SF related word like Null-A or Gosseyn None of those have a trademark or a domain registration. Establish whether Apache Stanbol is a suitable name - Key: PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8 Project: Podling Suitable Names Search Issue Type: Suitable Name Search Reporter: Fabian Christ We have to do some investigations to ensure that Apache Stanbol is a suitable name for a TLP. People should start searching on the Web and add their findings as comments. We should state: * Evidence of the degree of open source adoption for the proposed name. * Evidence of trademark registrations for the proposed name. * Evidence of the degree of branding usage of the proposed name on the world wide web. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8) Establish whether Apache Stanbol is a suitable name
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13411689#comment-13411689 ] Olivier Grisel commented on PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8: Hum, I am not sure about Seamen, unless it's a reference to south park: https://www.google.com/search?q=seaman+south+park+episodetbm=vid Establish whether Apache Stanbol is a suitable name - Key: PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8 Project: Podling Suitable Names Search Issue Type: Suitable Name Search Reporter: Fabian Christ We have to do some investigations to ensure that Apache Stanbol is a suitable name for a TLP. People should start searching on the Web and add their findings as comments. We should state: * Evidence of the degree of open source adoption for the proposed name. * Evidence of trademark registrations for the proposed name. * Evidence of the degree of branding usage of the proposed name on the world wide web. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8) Establish whether Apache Stanbol is a suitable name
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13411748#comment-13411748 ] Bertrand Delacretaz commented on PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8: - Please, please, please - no one is suggesting that the Stanbol name should change, this is just about due diligence w.r.t the current name. If a discussion about this is needed, please bring it to the dev list. Establish whether Apache Stanbol is a suitable name - Key: PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8 Project: Podling Suitable Names Search Issue Type: Suitable Name Search Reporter: Fabian Christ We have to do some investigations to ensure that Apache Stanbol is a suitable name for a TLP. People should start searching on the Web and add their findings as comments. We should state: * Evidence of the degree of open source adoption for the proposed name. * Evidence of trademark registrations for the proposed name. * Evidence of the degree of branding usage of the proposed name on the world wide web. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8) Establish whether Apache Stanbol is a suitable name
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13411876#comment-13411876 ] Fabian Christ commented on PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8: --- Google: = 111.000 hits Most of them produced by content that already is related to Apache Stanbol. Many other hits found for stan bol in a language I do not understand. Bing: = ignores my search for Stanbol and gives me hits for Istanbul. http://sourceforge.net = No hits Github: = Only Apache Stanbol related repos found URL: stanbol.com = Used by a Turkish (?) media agency company. Stanbol Watch Your Think! - I do not understand what this company is selling. URL: stanbol.net = seems to be unused URL: stanbol.org = seems to be unused http://trademarkregisterfaq.com/ = no results ohloh.net: = Only the Apache Stanbol project http://esearch.oami.europa.eu = no results Establish whether Apache Stanbol is a suitable name - Key: PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-8 Project: Podling Suitable Names Search Issue Type: Suitable Name Search Reporter: Fabian Christ We have to do some investigations to ensure that Apache Stanbol is a suitable name for a TLP. People should start searching on the Web and add their findings as comments. We should state: * Evidence of the degree of open source adoption for the proposed name. * Evidence of trademark registrations for the proposed name. * Evidence of the degree of branding usage of the proposed name on the world wide web. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: JSPWiki status (Was: [Incubator Wiki] Update of July2012 by JuanPabloSantos)
Oh, my misunderstanding then. If that's the case, then there is one technicality of the apache release process blocking the release (distributing dependencies alongside source), although not a tough one. I'll file a Jira and reflect it at the project incubation status page. regards, juan pablo On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez juanpablo.san...@gmail.com wrote: Regarding the binary dependencies. Wasn't the discussion on general@more focused on (or raised because of) transitive dependencies which were brought into the build and not being AL-compatible? No, all the dependencies discussed were compliant with Apache policies. The problem was about having binaries included in the source archive. Also, the build is Ant based, so we need them to be there in order to be able to build. The proposed solution for this case was to put the dependencies in a separate -deps archive, that can be combined with the source release to make it buildable. The build script can also automatically download such separate binary dependencies. BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Tashi status (Was: [Incubator Wiki] Update of July2012 by MichaelStroucken)
Hi, Thanks again for the great report, Tashi! The project seems genuinely useful, but it sounds like you're still having trouble attracting interest from potential new users and contributors. Perhaps it might help if you could come up with some kind of an overview of how Tashi fits into the picture with other big data projects at Apache. Which products it complements, which it competes with, where are its strengths, etc. You might also try reaching out to those other communities to see if there's interest in cooperation with Tashi. Any big data experts in the IPMC listening in? IIUC Tashi is a bit low on mentors, so if you're interested, I think help with tasks like the ones mentioned above and more general community building aspects would be welcome. On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 5:20 AM, Apache Wiki wikidi...@apache.org wrote: + The project has received code contributions from two non-committers in + this period. MIMOS via Luke Jing Yuan have contributed convertz to the + code base, a utility to convert a VM image to an image deployable to a + physical machine provisioned by Zoni. Alexey Tumanov of CMU provided a + communications timeout wrapper to handle the problem of threads hanging + forever, trying to communicate over a broken network connection. Candidates for committership? BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Oozie status (Was: [Incubator Wiki] Update of July2012 by AlanGates)
Hi, Thanks for the report, Oozie! On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Apache Wiki wikidi...@apache.org wrote: + * A list of the three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation: +* Improve the documentations: user and development for quicker adoption +* Automate the formal release process. +* Diversify the dev and committer base. The first two items aren't really graduation issues. The last one is, but I don't think there's much more you'll need to do on that front anymore to be able to graduate. Looking at Oozie activity I see people from both Cloudera and Yahoo committing stuff, and dozens of others from various different backgrounds chiming in on the mailing lists and the issue tracker. The PPMC has people from four different organizations. Sounds like a pretty diverse project to me. Or WDYT? + * How has the community developed since the last report: +* 88 JIRAs were resolved and 145 JIRAs were closed in last quarter. +* 103 JIRAs were created since last report. +* Oozie dev/users are active in the email lists (around 1000 Emails in oozie-dev and 250+ in oozie-user). +* Around 6 new developers are contributing to the process and coding. Sounds like you'll be able to continue adding new committers in near future. Based on all the above I think Oozie is getting pretty close to graduation. Have you already started thinking about that, or is there something that you feel still needs to be done while in the Incubator? BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Mesos status (Was: [Incubator Wiki] Update of July2012 by TomWhite2)
Hi, Thanks for the report, Mesos! On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Apache Wiki wikidi...@apache.org wrote: + Top priorities prior to graduation: + + - Same as before, finalize addition of new committers to the project! + - Do another release. What did happen with your drive to add new committers? I notice you started a vote on that in February but it kind of died away with no clear outcome. What's the status there? Also, as you mention, you did cut a release recently (congratulations!), but I don't see that on http://incubator.apache.org/mesos/download.html or announced anywhere. BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
