Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.8.0-incubating (rc4)

2013-12-16 Thread Henry Saputra
Thanks for the links Andrew, those are good insights.

- Henry

On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Andrew Phillips andr...@apache.org wrote:
 You might also want to have a look at how Scala itself deals with the issue
 of required binaries for the build:

 https://github.com/scala/scala/blob/master/pull-binary-libs.sh
 https://github.com/scala/scala/blob/master/tools/binary-repo-lib.sh

 I'm not necessarily a huge fan of this (builds on *nix only, for example),
 but it's at least another approach to throw into the mix...

 ap

 --
 Andrew Phillips
 Apache jclouds


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Enable Release Checklist Experiment

2013-12-16 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
 [X ] +1 Yes, apply the patch enabling the experiment.

-Bertrand

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.8.0-incubating (rc4)

2013-12-16 Thread Sergio Fernández

Hi,

although the basics looks fine:

* keys checked
* builds fine on a clean environment

I got some warnings that should be fixed in future releases:

* only key from one committer, without his apache email address
* few dependencies retrieved from out of maven central
* some libraries' binaries distributed with the source code

I'm not an expert on SBT, and I'm not sure why you need both...

On 14/12/13 04:13, Patrick Wendell wrote:

Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Spark 0.8.1-incubating!

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 0.8.1-incubating
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...


Therefore I do not feel comfortable accepting the release, so I have to 
vote +0 until those issue are clarified (see also further discussions in 
this thread).


Cheers,

--
Sergio Fernández
Senior Researcher
Knowledge and Media Technologies
Salzburg Research Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
Jakob-Haringer-Straße 5/3 | 5020 Salzburg, Austria
T: +43 662 2288 318 | M: +43 660 2747 925
sergio.fernan...@salzburgresearch.at
http://www.salzburgresearch.at

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Enable Release Checklist Experiment

2013-12-16 Thread ant elder
Obviously +1 from me on doing experiments, and -1 for the silly policy
update stuff.

   ...ant


On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.comwrote:

 Greetings,

 As the next step in our ongoing efforts to reform the release voting
 process,
 I propose that we run an experiment allowing the PPMC members of select
 podlings to earn binding votes under limited circumstances by completing a
 release checklist.

 For participating podlings, the Incubator's release management guide...

 http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html

 ... would be supplanted by the following documents:

 http://incubator.apache.org/guides/release_manifest.txt
 http://incubator.apache.org/guides/release.html

 The scope of this VOTE is limited to approving the following patch to our
 policy page:

 https://paste.apache.org/k4vJ

 Here is the patch content minus markup:

 2013 Alternate Release Voting Process

 Select podlings pre-cleared by a majority vote of the IPMC MAY
 participate in
 an alternate release voting process:

 Should a Podling decide it wishes to perform a release, the Podling
 SHALL
 hold a vote on the Podling's dev list and create a permanently archived
 Release Manifest as described in the Experimental Release Guide.  At
 least
 three +1 votes from PPMC members are required (see the Apache Voting
 Process page).  If the majority of PPMC votes is positive, then the
 Podling
 SHALL send a summary of that vote to the Incubator's general list and
 formally request the Incubator PMC approve such a release.

 Formal approval requires three binding +1 votes and more positive than
 negative votes.  Votes cast by members of the Incubator PMC are always
 binding.  For all releases after the first, votes cast by members
 of the PPMC
 are binding if a Mentor approves the Release Manifest.

 Please note that the proposed change is both incremental and reversible:

 *   It is incremental because podlings must be opted in by vote of the
 IPMC to
 participate.
 *   It is reversible because once the experiment has run its course the
 policy change can be reverted with zero impact through lazy consensus.

 Those who may have questions about the legitimacy of allowing binding votes
 from non-IPMC members should see this post from Roy Fielding:

 http://s.apache.org/v7

 Please vote:

 [ ] +1 Yes, apply the patch enabling the experiment.
 [ ] -1 No, do not apply the patch enabling the experiment.

 This majority VOTE will run for 7 days and will close at 13:00 PST on
 Friday,
 December 20, 2013.  Votes cast by members of the Incubator PMC are binding.

 Here is my own +1.

 Marvin Humphrey

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org




Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.8.0-incubating (rc4)

2013-12-16 Thread Patrick Wendell
 * only key from one committer, without his apache email address
I'll generate a key w/ my apache address for the next release. So far
we've only had one release manager so there is only one key.

 * few dependencies retrieved from out of maven central
This has been covered extensively in this thread and there is an
actionable plan for our next major release.

 * some libraries' binaries distributed with the source code
Directly related to the last point.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Enable Release Checklist Experiment

2013-12-16 Thread Dave Fisher
[X] +1 Yes, apply the patch enabling the experiment.

I kinda feel it doesn't need the Policy change and at this point it should be 
the 2014 ... but hey - still a positive vote.

Regards,
Dave

On Dec 13, 2013, at 12:59 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:

 Greetings,
 
 As the next step in our ongoing efforts to reform the release voting process,
 I propose that we run an experiment allowing the PPMC members of select
 podlings to earn binding votes under limited circumstances by completing a
 release checklist.
 
 For participating podlings, the Incubator's release management guide...
 
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
 
 ... would be supplanted by the following documents:
 
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/release_manifest.txt
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/release.html
 
 The scope of this VOTE is limited to approving the following patch to our
 policy page:
 
https://paste.apache.org/k4vJ
 
 Here is the patch content minus markup:
 
2013 Alternate Release Voting Process
 
Select podlings pre-cleared by a majority vote of the IPMC MAY
 participate in
an alternate release voting process:
 
Should a Podling decide it wishes to perform a release, the Podling SHALL
hold a vote on the Podling's dev list and create a permanently archived
Release Manifest as described in the Experimental Release Guide.  At least
three +1 votes from PPMC members are required (see the Apache Voting
Process page).  If the majority of PPMC votes is positive, then the Podling
SHALL send a summary of that vote to the Incubator's general list and
formally request the Incubator PMC approve such a release.
 
Formal approval requires three binding +1 votes and more positive than
negative votes.  Votes cast by members of the Incubator PMC are always
binding.  For all releases after the first, votes cast by members
 of the PPMC
are binding if a Mentor approves the Release Manifest.
 
 Please note that the proposed change is both incremental and reversible:
 
 *   It is incremental because podlings must be opted in by vote of the IPMC to
participate.
 *   It is reversible because once the experiment has run its course the
policy change can be reverted with zero impact through lazy consensus.
 
 Those who may have questions about the legitimacy of allowing binding votes
 from non-IPMC members should see this post from Roy Fielding:
 
http://s.apache.org/v7
 
 Please vote:
 
 [ ] +1 Yes, apply the patch enabling the experiment.
 [ ] -1 No, do not apply the patch enabling the experiment.
 
 This majority VOTE will run for 7 days and will close at 13:00 PST on Friday,
 December 20, 2013.  Votes cast by members of the Incubator PMC are binding.
 
 Here is my own +1.
 
 Marvin Humphrey
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Sirona 0.1-incubating

2013-12-16 Thread Olivier Lamy
FYI we got the last missing IPMC binding vote.

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-sirona-dev/201312.mbox/%3CCAN%3DtixmOspWgDXwVTfRiKvMK3kwBwRpiVrmzJ5xwKGiWDk3xfg%40mail.gmail.com%3E

So the vote now passed the requirement of 3 IPMC binding vote



SO the vote has passed.

On 2 December 2013 11:37, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
 Hi,

 I'd like to release Apache Sirona 0.1-incubating.

 Release notes: 
 http://sirona.incubator.apache.org/releases/release-notes-0.1-incubating.html

 Vote result from dev@sirona:
 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-sirona-dev/201312.mbox/browser

 Maven staged release repository:
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesirona-003/

 Distribution:
 * binaries: 
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sirona/0.1-incubating/binaries/
 * sources: 
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sirona/0.1-incubating/src/

 KEYS file available here:
 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/sirona/KEYS

 Vote open for 72H

 [+1]
 [0]
 [-1]

 Thanks
 --
 Olivier Lamy
 Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au
 http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy



-- 
Olivier Lamy
Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.8.0-incubating (rc4)

2013-12-16 Thread Henry Saputra
NOTICE, LICENSE, and README files looks good.
Checksum and signatures on the source jar looks good.

Per comments by Marvin and sebb, Spark will resolve the included jar
files in the source distribution in next release of 0.9 I am giving:
  +1
since this is 0.8.1 release which really hard to change build packaging.

We'll get it right for 0.9.

- Henry

On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Patrick Wendell pwend...@gmail.com wrote:
 Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark
 (incubating) version 0.8.1.

 The tag to be voted on is v0.8.1-incubating (commit b87d31d):
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-spark/repo?p=incubator-spark.git;a=commit;h=b87d31dd8eb4b4e47c0138e9242d0dd6922c8c4e

 The release files, including signatures, digests, etc can be found at:
 http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-0.8.1-incubating-rc4/

 Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
 https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/pwendell.asc

 The staging repository for this release can be found at:
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-040/

 The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at:
 http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-0.8.1-incubating-rc4-docs/

 For information about the contents of this release see:
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-spark.git;a=blob;f=CHANGES.txt;h=ce0aeab524505b63c7999e0371157ac2def6fe1c;hb=branch-0.8

 A vote on this release has passed within the Spark PPMC [1].

 Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Spark 0.8.1-incubating!

 The vote is open until Tuesday, December 17th at 03:30 UTC and
 passes if a majority of at least 3 +1 IPMC votes are cast.

 [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 0.8.1-incubating
 [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...

 To learn more about Apache Spark, please see
 http://spark.incubator.apache.org/

 [1]
 http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-spark-dev/201312.mbox/%3CCABPQxsuEYMn_JE0qEOcrt4J5-N1PJWgGcN7m0qzNefW7fsz2PA%40mail.gmail.com%3E

 (Note that at present the concluding message isn't shown due to lag in the
 mail archives.)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



[ANN] Apache Sirona 0.1-incubating

2013-12-16 Thread Olivier Lamy
The Apache Sirona Team is pleased to announce the first release
0.1-incubating of Apache Sirona project.

Apache Sirona provide a simple but extensible monitoring solution for
Java applications.

It's an incubating project and a technology preview release. So some
APIs can be change in the future.

The full release notes is available here:
http://sirona.incubator.apache.org/releases/release-notes-0.1-incubating.html
You can download the releases sources/binaries:
http://sirona.incubator.apache.org/download.cgi

We hope you will enjoy using Apache Sirona!
If you have any questions, please consult:
* the web site: http://sirona.incubator.apache.org/
* the sirona mailing lists: http://sirona.incubator.apache.org/mail-lists.html

Have Fun,
-- 
The Apache Sirona Team

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Enable Release Checklist Experiment

2013-12-16 Thread Chip Childers
On Friday, December 13, 2013, Marvin Humphrey wrote:

 Please vote:

 [ ] +1 Yes, apply the patch enabling the experiment.
 [ ] -1 No, do not apply the patch enabling the experiment.


+1


Re: [VOTE] Enable Release Checklist Experiment

2013-12-16 Thread David Crossley
Marvin Humphrey wrote:

 Please vote:
 
 [ ] +1 Yes, apply the patch enabling the experiment.
 [ ] -1 No, do not apply the patch enabling the experiment.

Here is my +1

-David

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] Enable Release Checklist Experiment

2013-12-16 Thread Till Westmann
+1

On Dec 13, 2013, at 12:59 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:

 Greetings,
 
 As the next step in our ongoing efforts to reform the release voting process,
 I propose that we run an experiment allowing the PPMC members of select
 podlings to earn binding votes under limited circumstances by completing a
 release checklist.
 
 For participating podlings, the Incubator's release management guide...
 
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
 
 ... would be supplanted by the following documents:
 
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/release_manifest.txt
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/release.html
 
 The scope of this VOTE is limited to approving the following patch to our
 policy page:
 
https://paste.apache.org/k4vJ
 
 Here is the patch content minus markup:
 
2013 Alternate Release Voting Process
 
Select podlings pre-cleared by a majority vote of the IPMC MAY
 participate in
an alternate release voting process:
 
Should a Podling decide it wishes to perform a release, the Podling SHALL
hold a vote on the Podling's dev list and create a permanently archived
Release Manifest as described in the Experimental Release Guide.  At least
three +1 votes from PPMC members are required (see the Apache Voting
Process page).  If the majority of PPMC votes is positive, then the Podling
SHALL send a summary of that vote to the Incubator's general list and
formally request the Incubator PMC approve such a release.
 
Formal approval requires three binding +1 votes and more positive than
negative votes.  Votes cast by members of the Incubator PMC are always
binding.  For all releases after the first, votes cast by members
 of the PPMC
are binding if a Mentor approves the Release Manifest.
 
 Please note that the proposed change is both incremental and reversible:
 
 *   It is incremental because podlings must be opted in by vote of the IPMC to
participate.
 *   It is reversible because once the experiment has run its course the
policy change can be reverted with zero impact through lazy consensus.
 
 Those who may have questions about the legitimacy of allowing binding votes
 from non-IPMC members should see this post from Roy Fielding:
 
http://s.apache.org/v7
 
 Please vote:
 
 [ ] +1 Yes, apply the patch enabling the experiment.
 [ ] -1 No, do not apply the patch enabling the experiment.
 
 This majority VOTE will run for 7 days and will close at 13:00 PST on Friday,
 December 20, 2013.  Votes cast by members of the Incubator PMC are binding.
 
 Here is my own +1.
 
 Marvin Humphrey
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org