Re: [DISCUSS] How do podlings add new mentors?
On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 6:50 PM, John D. Ament wrote: >> Very much +1 to this. Also, if anybody can spell this out and commit >> to the IPMC docs -- that'll be appreciated. Otherwise, I may be able >> to do in a few days. > > For some reason I thought I did already. I may not have committed it yet. > I'll take care of it in the morning. Thanks so much! Roman. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] How do podlings add new mentors?
On Dec 27, 2014 9:44 PM, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 3:23 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 6:31 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > >> ...I'd like to propose that a mentor should be able to join an existing > >> podling after volunteering and the PPMC of that podling agrees to it (via > >> lazy consensus) > > > > Whether the podling agrees by voting or lazy consensus does not matter > > IMO, I am ok with your suggestion - but a notice the the Incubator PMC > > is required IMO, just to keep it informed, and the project page under > > http://incubator.apache.org/projects/ should be kept up to date (or > > just point to the podling's website and keep that up to date). > > Very much +1 to this. Also, if anybody can spell this out and commit > to the IPMC docs -- that'll be appreciated. Otherwise, I may be able > to do in a few days. For some reason I thought I did already. I may not have committed it yet. I'll take care of it in the morning. John > > Thanks, > Roman. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >
Re: [DISCUSS] How do podlings add new mentors?
On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 3:23 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 6:31 PM, John D. Ament wrote: >> ...I'd like to propose that a mentor should be able to join an existing >> podling after volunteering and the PPMC of that podling agrees to it (via >> lazy consensus) > > Whether the podling agrees by voting or lazy consensus does not matter > IMO, I am ok with your suggestion - but a notice the the Incubator PMC > is required IMO, just to keep it informed, and the project page under > http://incubator.apache.org/projects/ should be kept up to date (or > just point to the podling's website and keep that up to date). Very much +1 to this. Also, if anybody can spell this out and commit to the IPMC docs -- that'll be appreciated. Otherwise, I may be able to do in a few days. Thanks, Roman. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[CANCEL] [VOTE] Release Apache Usergrid 1.0.1 (incubating) RC3
Justin, Thanks for finding these. We'll need to address the licensing problems ASAP. And here I was hoping I did a decent job scrubbing already. Consider this vote canceled. John On Fri Dec 26 2014 at 9:16:03 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry but it -1 binding due to license and notice issues and there's a jar > in the source release. > > Looks to me that LICENSE and NOTICE still need a little bit of work. As > per [1] there's no need to add MIT or BSD licensed code to the NOTICE file. > > SSToolkit is MIT licensed, Intro.js is MIT licensed and NPM MD5 is BSD > licensed - these should go into the LICENSE file not the NOTICE file. You > might want to fix up the misspelling of "product" at the same time. > > I also notice an Apache header has been placed on a file that is not > Apache licensed: > ./stack/launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/usergrid/launcher/ > ClasspathStaticHttpHandler.java > > Looks like the same has happen here: > ./stack/core/src/main/java/org/apache/usergrid/utils/BCrypt.java > > And also here: > ./sdks/dotnet/packages/NSubstitute.1.6.0.0/acknowledgements.txt > > There may be other instances of this. > > The ClasspathStaticHttpHandler.java file is licensed under GPL > (excluded) or CDDL (category B) so some care is needed to be taken in > including it in source form. [2] > > There's also a few missing bundled bits missing from LICENSE > - Sphinx Theme (BSD) > - JQuery sparkline (BSD) > - NSubstitute (BSD) > - Moq i(BSD) > - BCrypt (BSD) > > The file ./sdks/nodejs/LICENSE states it is MIT licensed is this correct? > > You may also want to check these 2 files and there content is different to > the other LICENSE files in sdks. > ./sdks/ruby/LICENSE > ./sdks/ruby-on-rails/LICENSE.txt > > Several JS files are missing the Apache header and may be licensed under > other licenses and perhaps also missing from LICENSE. What are the licenses > of these files? > ./portal/js/libs/MD5.min.js (is this the NPM MD5 mentioned in NOTICE?) > ./portal/js/libs/jqueryui/jquery.ui.timepicker.min.js (possibly from > here? http://trentrichardson.com/2010/04/19/timepicker-addon- > for-jquery-ui-datepicker/) > ./portal/js/libs/jqueryui/date.min.js > > There are two version of boostrap, but only one is mentioned in LICENSE: > ./portal/js/libs/bootstrap/custom/js/bootstrap.js > ./portal/js/libs/bootstrap/custom/js/bootstrap.min.js > ./portal/js/libs/bootstrap/js/bootstrap.js > ./portal/js/libs/bootstrap/js/bootstrap.min.js > > Finally there also a binary jar in the source release: > ./sdks/android/m2/repository/org/usergrid/usergrid-java- > client/0.0.6/usergrid-java-client-0.0.6.jar > > Thanks, > Justin > > 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps > 2. http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Brooklyn 0.7.0-M2-incubating [rc4]
Justin, To pick up on one of your points in more detail: > On 27 December 2014 at 04:09, Justin Mclean wrote: >> Some other minor issues you might want to change for next release: >> - There some java files under >> usage/archetypes/quickstart/src/brooklyn-sample that are missing Apache >> headers This one has been previously discussed on our lists; our conclusion with our mentors was that the archetype is an empty, skeleton, project that has no creative content and therefore does not require an Apache license header. You can see the discussion here: https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-brooklyn-dev/201409.mbox/%3CCAKprHVY8vdcUPHECOCCD3dH0xQWYqi90WLo3K-Oy4qFZ0scf7A%40mail.gmail.com%3E Please let us know if this is something that needs re-visited. Thanks, Richard. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Brooklyn 0.7.0-M2-incubating [rc4]
Thanks for the feedback, Justin. We'll get those items checked before our next release. Richard. On 27 December 2014 at 04:09, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 binding > > I checked: > - hashes and MD5 fine > - DISCLAIMER exists > - artefact has incubating in file name > - LICENSE and NOTICE good (checked all items) > - No unexpected binary files in source release > - Most source code has correct headers (see below) > - Can compile from source > > A few minor things missing from LICENSE, can you add these in the next > release. > - superfish (MIT) > - JQuery slideto looks be MIT not Apache to me. [1] > > Some other minor issues you might want to change for next release: > - There some java files under usage/archetypes/quickstart/src/brooklyn-sample > that are missing Apache headers > - Can usage/jsgui/src/main/webapp/assets/images/Sorting icons.psd be put a > more OS friendly format? > > Thanks, > Justin > > 1. > http://web.archive.org/web/20121119015407/http://jesseprice.com/jquery-slide-to-plugin/ > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] How do podlings add new mentors?
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 6:31 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > ...I'd like to propose that a mentor should be able to join an existing > podling after volunteering and the PPMC of that podling agrees to it (via > lazy consensus) Whether the podling agrees by voting or lazy consensus does not matter IMO, I am ok with your suggestion - but a notice the the Incubator PMC is required IMO, just to keep it informed, and the project page under http://incubator.apache.org/projects/ should be kept up to date (or just point to the podling's website and keep that up to date). -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
