Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DolphinScheduler (Incubating) 1.2.0

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

> I don't understand the above content,If it means the idleness.txt is GPL?

No it not under an open source license, from memory it still under copyright 
and expires in 2027.

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DolphinScheduler (Incubating) 1.2.0

[李 岗]

Thanks Justin,Thank you very much for your guidance!
[1]I just read this email thread.


 I need some guidance from you.
   > but I think the GPL and commercial software issues are still reasonably 
serious.

Now I know category A and category B is compatible,if appears category a or 
category x, category a and category x,Need choose Category A in order to make 
compatible.
Based on the above,So I did not find  the GPL issue.

But ./dolphinscheduler-ui/node_modules/wordwrap/test/idleness.txt will be exist 
when npm install,and I see the content from you in the email thread.

  >Those files contain In Praise of Idleness by Bertrand Russell.

I don't understand the above content,If it means the idleness.txt is GPL?


1.https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c4067f42d963414d4d5fbaf66ee81f805133918f804e9f5eca2161e9%40%3Cdev.dubbo.apache.org%3E.

DolphinScheduler(Incubator) PPMC
Gang Li 李岗

lgcareer2...@outlook.com

From: Justin Mclean
Date: 2019-12-13 14:05
To: general
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DolphinScheduler (Incubating) 1.2.0
Hi,

> When execute `mvn clean install -Prelease` in the source release,it will 
> install node and npm, and npm run build,so node/node_modules/npm/node_modules 
> will exist in dolphinscheduler-ui,

I thought I was seeing that before I ran mvn, perhaps I made a mistake, if so 
sorry.  I’ll recheck, but I think the GPL and commercial software issues are 
still reasonably serious.

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DolphinScheduler (Incubating) 1.2.0

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

> When execute `mvn clean install -Prelease` in the source release,it will 
> install node and npm, and npm run build,so node/node_modules/npm/node_modules 
> will exist in dolphinscheduler-ui,

I thought I was seeing that before I ran mvn, perhaps I made a mistake, if so 
sorry.  I’ll recheck, but I think the GPL and commercial software issues are 
still reasonably serious.

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DolphinScheduler (Incubating) 1.2.0

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

To understand what is allowed under the WIP disclaimer please see [1]. 
Including commercial software would be in the first category. (i.e. "3rd party 
Category X or Category B bundled code licenses not listed in LICENSE”)

Thanks,.
Justin

1. https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-469
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DolphinScheduler (Incubating) 1.2.0

[李 岗]

Hi,Justin,Thanks for your check.
> It seems to me that you may of included code you did not intend to 
include in a source release [3]. there are 368 pieces of 3rd party code there. 
None are mentioned in LICENSE.

When execute `mvn clean install -Prelease` in the source release,it will 
install node and npm, and npm run build,so node/node_modules/npm/node_modules 
will exist in dolphinscheduler-ui,
If need mentioned in LICENSE. Is it only add npm source license?Hope to get 
your suggest.



DolphinScheduler(Incubator) PPMC
Gang Li 李岗

lgcareer2...@outlook.com

From: Justin Mclean
Date: 2019-12-13 11:33
To: general
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DolphinScheduler (Incubating) 1.2.0
Hi,

+0 (binding)

it would have been good to see some attempt at fixing the licensing 
issues/LICENSE file, but I trust this will be done with future releases.

I’m +0 rather than +1, even with the WIP disclaimer, for a few reasons:
- This release also contain content you probably don’t have permission to 
distribute. [1] This has been discussed before [2]
- The release may include GPL code this should be made clear to the user in the 
DISCLAIMER, I think it needs to be stronger than "Releases may have incomplete 
licensing conditions”
- It seems to me that you may of included code you did not intend to include in 
a source release [3]. there are 368 pieces of 3rd party code there. None are 
mentioned in LICENSE.
- It seems some people voting checked what in GitHub rather than what was in 
the source release
- Several people stated that "All software dependencies are mentioned in 
LICENSE or NOTICE” when it’s clearly not the case

I would suggest you cancel this RC and try again, but if you feel you need to 
make a release and other IPMC member are happy with the above go for it.

I checked:
-incubating in name
- DISCLAIMER exists (WIP version)
- LICENSE is missing a while lot of bundled 3rd party software e.g. 
FontAwesome, IconFont, cookie,.js, e5 shim, bootstrap etc etc
- NOTICE is fine
- all source files have ASF headers (but they could be added to some .sql files)
- no unexpected binary files
- can compile from source

Thanks,
Justin

1. ./dolphinscheduler-ui/node_modules/wordwrap/test/idleness.txt
2. 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c4067f42d963414d4d5fbaf66ee81f805133918f804e9f5eca2161e9%40%3Cdev.dubbo.apache.org%3E
3. ./dolphinscheduler-ui/node/node_modules/npm/node_modules


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DolphinScheduler (Incubating) 1.2.0

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

> so anything permissively licked 

Thanks auto correct, I meant to say "permissively licensed" :-)

Justin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DolphinScheduler (Incubating) 1.2.0

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

>OK，Will be resolved in the Apache version that does not meet the Apache 
> standards, such as font, iconfont, css, js, sass etc

These things may not need to be removed right away or evan at all. You need to 
understand how they are licensed and if that licenses is compatible. See 
[1][2][3] so anything that permissively licked e.g. MIT or BSD can stay, and 
with the work in progress disclaimer you could include GPL software (Category 
X) as long as you include it license and tell the end user about it. But 
knowing including code that requires a commercial license and distributing that 
is probably less than ideal. One could possibly argue it up to the end user to 
buy the license and tell them that in the disclaimer, but if it was me and it 
was easy to fix I’d just go ahead and fix it.

Thanks,
Justin

1. https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a
2. https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
3. https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DolphinScheduler (Incubating) 1.2.0

[qiao zhanwei]

Hi Justin ,
OK，Will be resolved in the Apache version that does not meet the Apache 
standards, such as font, iconfont, css, js, sass etc

thx
―
DolphinScheduler(Incubator)  PPMC
Zhanwei Qiao 乔占卫

qiaozhan...@outlook.com

From: Justin Mclean
Date: 2019-12-13 11:54
To: general
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DolphinScheduler (Incubating) 1.2.0
Hi,

I also notice that ASF headers have been placed on files that are not ASF 
licensed. e.g [1]

Thanks,
Justin

1. ./dolphinscheduler-ui/src/font/iconfont.css
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DolphinScheduler (Incubating) 1.2.0

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

> For commercial license files(font) included, although I will not change the
> vote to -1, but still recommend you to consider to cancel the vote.

I’m not 100% sure they are commercial, some versions of FontAwesome shipped 
with bootstrap is OK but It’s MIT from memory, one it’s own it may not be. I’m 
not sure how IconFont is licensed are you saying it a commercial licensed font?

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DolphinScheduler (Incubating) 1.2.0

[Sheng Wu]

Added DolphinScheduler dev ML to the reply.

Hi DolphinScheduler PPMC

For commercial license files(font) included, although I will not change the
vote to -1, but still recommend you to consider to cancel the vote.

I know you have felt frustrating about failure and want to make a release
ASAP.
If you really think your end users are urgent for this release, you could
make a call to continue and release.

But to be honest, commercial license related license is not good for the
end users too. Because every one who uses this release and don’t buy the
front, is having license issue.

Justin Mclean 于2019年12月13日 周五上午11:33写道：

> Hi,
>
> +0 (binding)
>
> it would have been good to see some attempt at fixing the licensing
> issues/LICENSE file, but I trust this will be done with future releases.
>
> I’m +0 rather than +1, even with the WIP disclaimer, for a few reasons:
> - This release also contain content you probably don’t have permission to
> distribute. [1] This has been discussed before [2]
> - The release may include GPL code this should be made clear to the user
> in the DISCLAIMER, I think it needs to be stronger than "Releases may have
> incomplete licensing conditions”
> - It seems to me that you may of included code you did not intend to
> include in a source release [3]. there are 368 pieces of 3rd party code
> there. None are mentioned in LICENSE.
> - It seems some people voting checked what in GitHub rather than what was
> in the source release
> - Several people stated that "All software dependencies are mentioned in
> LICENSE or NOTICE” when it’s clearly not the case
>
> I would suggest you cancel this RC and try again, but if you feel you need
> to make a release and other IPMC member are happy with the above go for it.
>
> I checked:
> -incubating in name
> - DISCLAIMER exists (WIP version)
> - LICENSE is missing a while lot of bundled 3rd party software e.g.
> FontAwesome, IconFont, cookie,.js, e5 shim, bootstrap etc etc
> - NOTICE is fine
> - all source files have ASF headers (but they could be added to some .sql
> files)
> - no unexpected binary files
> - can compile from source
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1. ./dolphinscheduler-ui/node_modules/wordwrap/test/idleness.txt
> 2.
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c4067f42d963414d4d5fbaf66ee81f805133918f804e9f5eca2161e9%40%3Cdev.dubbo.apache.org%3E
> 3. ./dolphinscheduler-ui/node/node_modules/npm/node_modules
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
> --
Sheng Wu 吴晟

Apache SkyWalking
Apache Incubator
Apache ShardingSphere, ECharts, DolphinScheduler podlings
Zipkin
Twitter, wusheng1108

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DolphinScheduler (Incubating) 1.2.0

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

I also notice that ASF headers have been placed on files that are not ASF 
licensed. e.g [1]

Thanks,
Justin

1. ./dolphinscheduler-ui/src/font/iconfont.css
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DolphinScheduler (Incubating) 1.2.0

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

+0 (binding) 

it would have been good to see some attempt at fixing the licensing 
issues/LICENSE file, but I trust this will be done with future releases.

I’m +0 rather than +1, even with the WIP disclaimer, for a few reasons:
- This release also contain content you probably don’t have permission to 
distribute. [1] This has been discussed before [2]
- The release may include GPL code this should be made clear to the user in the 
DISCLAIMER, I think it needs to be stronger than "Releases may have incomplete 
licensing conditions”
- It seems to me that you may of included code you did not intend to include in 
a source release [3]. there are 368 pieces of 3rd party code there. None are 
mentioned in LICENSE.
- It seems some people voting checked what in GitHub rather than what was in 
the source release
- Several people stated that "All software dependencies are mentioned in 
LICENSE or NOTICE” when it’s clearly not the case

I would suggest you cancel this RC and try again, but if you feel you need to 
make a release and other IPMC member are happy with the above go for it.

I checked:
-incubating in name
- DISCLAIMER exists (WIP version)
- LICENSE is missing a while lot of bundled 3rd party software e.g. 
FontAwesome, IconFont, cookie,.js, e5 shim, bootstrap etc etc
- NOTICE is fine
- all source files have ASF headers (but they could be added to some .sql files)
- no unexpected binary files
- can compile from source

Thanks,
Justin

1. ./dolphinscheduler-ui/node_modules/wordwrap/test/idleness.txt
2. 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c4067f42d963414d4d5fbaf66ee81f805133918f804e9f5eca2161e9%40%3Cdev.dubbo.apache.org%3E
3. ./dolphinscheduler-ui/node/node_modules/npm/node_modules


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

RE: [MENTORS] Sign off on Incubator Reports

[Gangumalla, Uma]

Hi Justin,

I have just signed off and added my comments. 

Thank you.

Regards,
Uma

-Original Message-
From: Justin Mclean  
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2019 6:03 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [MENTORS] Sign off on Incubator Reports

Hi,

The report has been submitted but we’re still missing some sign offs.

If you haevn't signed off the report please do so over at:
https://whimsy.apache.org/board/agenda/2019-12-18/Incubator

It would be good to see more sign off for:
BatchEE
Druid
Hivemall
Marvin-AI
MesaTEE
Samoa
Spot (still missing sign off but only has one mentor) ShardingSphere 
Streampipes Superset

Congratulation to Brpc, Crail, and  Apisix where all the mentors signed off the 
report.

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[Result][Vote] Release Apache IoTDB 0.8.2

[Xiangdong Huang]

Hi all,

The vote to release Apache IoTDB (incubating) 0.8.2 has passed with 3 +1
binding votes and 1 +1 non-binding vote.

binding votes:

Willem Jiang
Kevin A. McGrail
Justin Mclean

non-binding vote:
Jincheng Sun

Vote thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9653646c533df93e286a512b2b5c544b8d7bc9a565183806feeec642%40%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E

Thank you to the above IPMC members for taking the time to review and
provide guidance on our release!

We will proceed with publishing the approved artifacts and sending out the
appropriate announcements in the coming days.

On behalf of the Apache IoTDB Community,
Xiangdong Huang

Re: [VOTE] Apache Crail 1.2-incubating (rc2)

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

+1 (binding)

I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE is fine
- NOTICE has incorrect year
- all source file have ASF headers
- no unexpected binary files
- can compile from source

The CREDITS file is a little unusual as what’s in that file normal goes in 
NOTICE.

Along with teh NOTICE file, this file also has the incorrect copyright year [1].

Thanks,
Justin

1. ./doc/source/conf.py


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] YuniKorn Proposal

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

Sounds like a good proposal.

I can see it was opened source back in March but you haven’t seemed to have 
made any releases or added any new committers since then. An I correct in that 
assumption? Is the any reason for that? I note in the proposal that you have 
people from other organisations that you say are already collaborating with you 
on Github, but I cannot see much if any activity from them. The core repo has 5 
main committers (and two others). The other repos are similar. As you note not 
all contribution are code, so I may be missing something. Can you explain how 
the initial committers were chosen and provide a bit more detail on their 
relationship to the project?

You mention the use of Slack, weekly catch up and open community meetings. How 
is the information discussed there passed on to other community members who are 
not on slack or not able to attend those meetings? Are any decisions made at 
those meetings or on Slack?

The length of time to incubate seems a little on the short side, especially for 
a project that doesn’t seem to have a large community around it and most of the 
core set of developers working for a single company. I’d be happy to be proven 
wrong about that, but if the project ended up in incubation for longer would 
this be an issue?. Projects typically spend 1 to 1 1/2 years in the incubator, 
some take less time some take more, some a lot more.

There’s at least one section missing from your proposal [1], the information on 
the project name is important, can you answer that? Infra in particular is 
concerned about the amount of effort a name change takes.

Your mentors need to be IPMC members [2][3] but as Dave notes, being ASF 
members they can ask to join the IPMC.

Thanks,
Justin

1. https://wiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/New+Podling+Proposal
2. https://incubator.apache.org/guides/participation.html#as_a_mentor
3. https://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#mentors_must_be_on_the_ipmc


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[MENTORS] Sign off on Incubator Reports

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

The report has been submitted but we’re still missing some sign offs.

If you haevn't signed off the report please do so over at:
https://whimsy.apache.org/board/agenda/2019-12-18/Incubator

It would be good to see more sign off for:
BatchEE
Druid
Hivemall
Marvin-AI
MesaTEE
Samoa
Spot (still missing sign off but only has one mentor)
ShardingSphere
Streampipes
Superset

Congratulation to Brpc, Crail, and  Apisix where all the mentors signed off the 
report.

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

回复: [VOTE] Release Apache DolphinScheduler (Incubating) 1.2.0

[李 岗]

Carry 4 +1 binding from dev.

4 +1 votes from mentor:
- Sheng Wu
- ShaoFeng Shi
- Kevin Ratnasekera
- Furkan Kamaci


DolphinScheduler(Incubator) PPMC
Gang Li 李岗

lgcareer2...@outlook.com

发件人： lgcareer2...@outlook.com
发送时间： 2019-12-10 14:28
收件人： general
主题： [VOTE] Release Apache DolphinScheduler (Incubating) 1.2.0
Hello everyone,

This is a call for vote to release Apache DolphinScheduler (Incubating) version 
1.2.0.

The Apache DolphinScheduler community has voted on and approved a proposal to 
release
Apache DolphinScheduler (Incubating) version 1.2.0.

We now kindly request the Incubator IPMC members review and vote on this 
incubator release.

Dolphin Scheduler is a distributed and easy-to-expand visual DAG workflow 
scheduling system,
dedicated to solving the complex dependencies in data processing, making the 
scheduling system out of the box for data processing.

DolphinScheduler community vote and result threads:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f301e6e279e6dc92820ba65009c49b8e51b7c44d3cdee4073769e664%40%3Cdev.dolphinscheduler.apache.org%3E

https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ba104385d44c129b6fdcfe96d984b58a15b2f8b7a5aedf8cf965d2b1%40%3Cdev.dolphinscheduler.apache.org%3E

Release notes:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-dolphinscheduler/blob/1.2.0/ReleaseNotes.md

The release candidates:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/dolphinscheduler/1.2.0/

Maven 2 staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedolphinscheduler-1014/org/apache/dolphinscheduler/

Git tag for the release:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-dolphinscheduler/tree/1.2.0

Release Commit ID:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-dolphinscheduler/commit/a97230f9051411b551793d5a4386e7630365713f

Keys to verify the Release Candidate:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/dolphinscheduler/KEYS

Look at here for how to verify this release candidate:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-dolphinscheduler/blob/1.2.0-release/README.md

The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of votes 
are reached.
Please vote accordingly:

[ ] +1 approve

[ ] +0 no opinion

[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason

Checklist for reference:

[ ] Download links are valid.

[ ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.

[ ] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.

[ ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each DolphinScheduler repo.

[ ] All files have license headers if necessary.

[ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.

More detail checklist  please refer:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Incubator+Release+Checklist


DolphinScheduler(Incubator) PPMC
Gang Li 李岗

lgcareer2...@outlook.com

Re: [VOTE] Recommend 'Apache Druid graduation to Top Level Project' resolution to the board

[jincheng sun]

+1 (non-binding), looking forward it happen.

Best,
Jincheng

Woonsan Ko  于2019年12月11日周三 下午11:10写道：

> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards,
>
> Woonsan
>
> On Sat, Dec 7, 2019 at 4:55 PM Gian Merlino  wrote:
> >
> > Earlier this year, Druid voted to graduate to a top level project. The
> vote
> > passed in the Druid community and the Incubator, and a resolution was
> > submitted to the Board, but needed to be shelved at the last minute. We
> are
> > now ready to proceed to graduation once again, and so I would like to
> call
> > another vote. The Druid project has re-voted and has notified the Board
> of
> > these developments. We now seek consent from the Incubator community to
> > propose a graduation resolution for the Dec 18 board meeting.
> >
> > The proposed graduation resolution is nearly the same as last time; the
> > only changes are the addition of four new initial members (fokko, furkan,
> > qmm, and vogievetsky).
> >
> > For reference,
> >
> > 1) The Druid vote that was just held:
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/3b1432780b8d841fffce3033cd5cc39fe1fe0f46feccb96f036dbf01%40%3Cdev.druid.apache.org%3E
> >
> > 2) Our prior Incubator graduation vote, which passed earlier this year:
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/19b703fdf192ddf8e31bda57264e03113c7e44b5954a56886e05@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> >
> > Please take a minute to vote on whether or not Apache Druid should
> graduate
> > to a Top Level Project by responding with one of the following:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Apache Druid should graduate
> > [ ]  0 No opinion
> > [ ] -1 Apache Druid should not graduate because...
> >
> > The VOTE is open for a minimum of 72 hours.
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Establish Apache Druid Project
> >
> > WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> > interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's
> > purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charged with
> > the creation and maintenance of open-source analytical database
> > software, for distribution at no charge to the public.
> >
> > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
> > Committee (PMC), to be known as the "The Apache Druid Project",
> > be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
> > Foundation; and be it further
> >
> > RESOLVED, that The Apache Druid Project be and hereby is
> > responsible for the creation and maintenance of an analytical
> > database software project; and be it further
> >
> > RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Druid" be and
> > hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at the
> > direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of The Apache
> > Druid Project, and to have primary responsibility for
> > management of the projects within the scope of responsibility of
> > The Apache Druid Project; and be it further
> >
> > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of The
> > Apache Druid Project:
> >
> >   * Benedict Jin (asdf2...@apache.org)
> >   * Charles Allen(cral...@apache.org)
> >   * Clint Wylie  (cwy...@apache.org)
> >   * David Lim(david...@apache.org)
> >   * Dylan Wylie  (dylanwy...@apache.org)
> >   * Eric Tschetter   (ched...@apache.org)
> >   * Fangjin Yang (f...@apache.org)
> >   * Fokko Driesprong (fo...@apache.org)
> >   * Furkan Kamaci(kam...@apache.org)
> >   * Gian Merlino (g...@apache.org)
> >   * Himanshu Gupta   (himans...@apache.org)
> >   * Jihoon Son   (jihoon...@apache.org)
> >   * Jonathan Wei (jon...@apache.org)
> >   * Julian Hyde  (jh...@apache.org)
> >   * Kurt Young   (k...@apache.org)
> >   * Lijin Bin(binli...@apache.org)
> >   * Maxime Beauchemin(maximebeauche...@apache.org)
> >   * Mingming Qiu (q...@apache.org)
> >   * Niketh Sabbineni (nik...@apache.org)
> >   * Nishant Bangarwa (nish...@apache.org)
> >   * P. Taylor Goetz  (ptgo...@apache.org)
> >   * Parag Jain   (pja...@apache.org)
> >   * Roman Leventov   (leven...@apache.org)
> >   * Slim Bouguerra   (bs...@apache.org)
> >   * Surekha Saharan  (sure...@apache.org)
> >   * Xavier Léauté(x...@apache.org)
> >   * Vadim Ogievetsky (vogievet...@apache.org)
> >
> > NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Gian Merlino
> > be and hereby is appointed to the office of Vice President,
> > Druid, to serve in accordance with and subject to the direction
> > of the Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
> > death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or
> > until a successor is appointed; and be it further
> >
> > RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Druid Project be and hereby
> > is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
> > Incubator Druid podling; and be it further
> >
> > RESOLVED, that all responsibility pertaining to the Apache
> > 

Re: [Vote] Release Apache IoTDB 0.8.2

[jincheng sun]

+1(non-binding)

I only do the simply check as follows:

- Successfully build the source
- Download the binaries and start a server and a client, successfully do
some testing

Best,
Jincheng

Kevin A. McGrail  于2019年12月12日周四 上午1:00写道：

> I vote +1 binding as well.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> I checked the same with one exception:
> - Incubating in the name of source and binary kit
> - DISCLAIMER exists
> - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
> - No unexpected binary files
> - Checked PGP signatures
> - Checked Checksums
> - I used the binaries for testing.
>
> Regards,
> KAM
> --
> Kevin A. McGrail
> Member, Apache Software Foundation
> Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 6:30 AM Willem Jiang 
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > I checked
> > - Incubating in the name of source and binary kit
> > - DISCLAIMER exists
> > - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
> > - No unexpected binary files
> > - Checked PGP signatures
> > - Checked Checksums
> > - Build the source without any issue
> >
> > Willem Jiang
> >
> > Twitter: willemjiang
> > Weibo: 姜宁willem
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 10:10 PM Xiangdong Huang 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > This is a call for vote to release Apache IoTDB (Incubating) version
> > 0.8.2,
> > > which is a bug fix version of 0.8.1.
> > >
> > > The Apache IoTDB community has voted on and approved a proposal to
> > release
> > > Apache IoTDB (Incubating) version 0.8.2.
> > >
> > > We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this
> > > incubator release.
> > >
> > > Apache IoTDB (incubating) (Database for Internet of Things) is an
> > > integrated data management engine designed for timeseries data. It
> > provides
> > > users with services for data collection, storage and analysis.
> > >
> > > IoTDB community vote and result thread:
> > > Result:
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/918d52d0fd306aa92b9ad3f0510611e73dc843d65c6747bd28c6a143%40%3Cdev.iotdb.apache.org%3E
> > > Vote:
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/dadba801d3e72b97d997d17470bcf98bdfd217cde14434c8db847ca4%40%3Cdev.iotdb.apache.org%3E
> > >
> > > The release candidates (RC2):
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/iotdb/0.8.2/rc2
> > >
> > > Git tag for the release (RC2):
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-iotdb/releases/tag/release%2F0.8.2
> > >
> > > Hash for the release tag:
> > > 09a94f2c02dec27f483a2ccb41a8265331be193d
> > >
> > > Release Notes:
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-iotdb/blob/release/0.8.2/RELEASE_NOTES.md
> > >
> > > The artifacts have been signed with Key : 2206EF8F64C35889, which can
> be
> > >
> > > found in the keys file:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/iotdb/KEYS
> > >
> > > Look at here for how to verify this release candidate:
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IOTDB/Validating+a+staged+Release
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > >
> > >
> > > From the PPMC Vote we carry over 1 binding IPMC Votes:
> > >
> > > +1 from Justin Mclean
> > >
> > > The vote will be passed if there is more than 2 +1 votes (except for
> > Justin
> > > Mclean)  and no -1 votes.
> > >
> > > Look forward to all IPMCs' vote for it.
> > >
> > > Please vote accordingly:
> > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > >
> > > Yours Sincerely,
> > > Xiangdong Huang
> > > Apache IoTDB (incubating)
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>