[PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator
Dear all, I would like to propose S4 to be an Apache Incubator project. S4 is a distributed streaming platform written in Java. Here is a link to the proposal in the Incubator wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/S4Proposal Thanks, Leo Neumeyer http://s4.io http://twitter.com/leoneu - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator
Hi Leo, We are quite interested in using and helping contribute to S4 as a more pure streaming events processing platform. If there are no objections I would like to add myself to the initial list of committers. My primary interest is in social platform and distributed systems. Currently PMC in Apache Shindig, and contributing in other Apache projects. - Henry On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Leo Neumeyer wrote: > Dear all, > > I would like to propose S4 to be an Apache Incubator project. S4 is a > distributed streaming platform written in Java. > > Here is a link to the proposal in the Incubator wiki: > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/S4Proposal > > Thanks, > Leo Neumeyer > > http://s4.io > http://twitter.com/leoneu > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator
Hi Leo, I am also very much interested .. great to have this in Apache. --Srinath On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:28 AM, Henry Saputra wrote: > Hi Leo, > > We are quite interested in using and helping contribute to S4 as a > more pure streaming events processing platform. > > If there are no objections I would like to add myself to the initial > list of committers. > > My primary interest is in social platform and distributed systems. > Currently PMC in Apache Shindig, and contributing in other Apache projects. > > - Henry > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Leo Neumeyer wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> I would like to propose S4 to be an Apache Incubator project. S4 is a >> distributed streaming platform written in Java. >> >> Here is a link to the proposal in the Incubator wiki: >> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/S4Proposal >> >> Thanks, >> Leo Neumeyer >> >> http://s4.io >> http://twitter.com/leoneu >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- WSO2 Inc. http://wso2.com Blog: http://srinathsview.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator
Hi Leo, Looks very interesting. I am very interested to join the project and help with implementation. If you are interested you can add me to initial committers list. In telecommunication (Ericsson) we are very interested in using distributed streaming so is good idea to start contributing for this project as well. I am a committer (awojtuniak) of Apache Felix and Aries. Cheers, Adam Wojtuniak awojtun...@apache.org On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Srinath Perera wrote: > Hi Leo, > > I am also very much interested .. great to have this in Apache. > > --Srinath > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:28 AM, Henry Saputra > wrote: > > Hi Leo, > > > > We are quite interested in using and helping contribute to S4 as a > > more pure streaming events processing platform. > > > > If there are no objections I would like to add myself to the initial > > list of committers. > > > > My primary interest is in social platform and distributed systems. > > Currently PMC in Apache Shindig, and contributing in other Apache > projects. > > > > - Henry > > > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Leo Neumeyer > wrote: > >> Dear all, > >> > >> I would like to propose S4 to be an Apache Incubator project. S4 is a > >> distributed streaming platform written in Java. > >> > >> Here is a link to the proposal in the Incubator wiki: > >> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/S4Proposal > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Leo Neumeyer > >> > >> http://s4.io > >> http://twitter.com/leoneu > >> > >> - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > -- > >WSO2 Inc. http://wso2.com >Blog: http://srinathsview.blogspot.com/ > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator
On 14 Sep 2011, at 21:19, Leo Neumeyer wrote: > Dear all, > > I would like to propose S4 to be an Apache Incubator project. S4 is a > distributed streaming platform written in Java. > > Here is a link to the proposal in the Incubator wiki: > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/S4Proposal > > Thanks, > Leo Neumeyer > > http://s4.io > http://twitter.com/leoneu This sounds like a really interesting proposal Leo - would it work with emerging streaming capabilities for browser such as WebRTC and WebSockets? For example, would it work as a processor for streams coming in from a browser via WebRTC or HTML5 Device Capture, as well as for pushing streams out into elements or to websocket clients? > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator
Sounds really interesting. Looking forward to seeing this incubated. Cheers, Akash A On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Scott Wilson < scott.bradley.wil...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 14 Sep 2011, at 21:19, Leo Neumeyer wrote: > > > Dear all, > > > > I would like to propose S4 to be an Apache Incubator project. S4 is a > > distributed streaming platform written in Java. > > > > Here is a link to the proposal in the Incubator wiki: > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/S4Proposal > > > > Thanks, > > Leo Neumeyer > > > > http://s4.io > > http://twitter.com/leoneu > > > This sounds like a really interesting proposal Leo - would it work with > emerging streaming capabilities for browser such as WebRTC and WebSockets? > For example, would it work as a processor for streams coming in from a > browser via WebRTC or HTML5 Device Capture, as well as for pushing streams > out into elements or to websocket clients? > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Leo Neumeyer wrote: > Dear all, > > I would like to propose S4 to be an Apache Incubator project. S4 is a > distributed streaming platform written in Java. > > Here is a link to the proposal in the Incubator wiki: > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/S4Proposal > Awesome! I'm very happy to see S4 joining Apache, and am volunteering to help out. I've added myself to the "initial committers" list on the proposal wiki. Definitely looking forward to this. Cheers, Phil - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator
Hi everyone, To introduce myself, I'm a ZooKeeper committer and PMC member. I'm used to the process of selecting committers for ZooKeeper, but I'm new to the incubator process, so I would appreciate if the community could shed some light here. I have read the guide to participation: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/participation.html and I understand from there that people shouldn't simply jump in as an initial committer without a short introduction and without acknowledgment from the proposer. Thanks to the ones who followed the protocol and introduced themselves. Our expectation when we submitted the proposal was that the initial set of committers would comprise the people who have initially contributed to get the current code to this stage, and we were not expecting arbitrary requests to join the initial list of committers. Of course, as a potential Apache project (now potentially incubator, but looking forward to being TLP in the future), we are ready to work towards building a community, which includes granting the status of committer to contributors. However, we'd like new committers to earn their status by showing commitment to the community and demonstrating technical merit. We understand that it is important to have other people who are experienced with ASF to mentor the project, and we don't want to drive these people away or anyone else who is willing to contribute. Committership and mentorship sound like different issues, though, and we would like committership in general (ASF experienced or not) to be earned. I was also checking some other threads that discuss the issue, and I believe my message reflects some of the points in previous threads, so I'm linking them here: http://markmail.org/message/hfy2clgc3ddwfjnz http://markmail.org/message/nkfugts33sw37gwf What exactly is expected and how should we proceed? Thanks, -Flavio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: > > I have read the guide to participation: > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/participation.html > > and I understand from there that people shouldn't simply jump in as an > initial committer without a short introduction and without acknowledgment > from the proposer. Since I was one of those people, let me issue a "mea culpa" here. Despite having read the participation guidelines (more than once even) I apparently slipped into a bit of a conditioned response, from observed behavior. For better or worse, it has become not uncommon (in my experience) to see people simply "jump in" and add themselves. In retrospect, yes, it probably is a bit rude, and I apologize for my part in this. I suppose t's just what Roy said in 2006: everybody saw a certain process appearing to happen, assumed it was policy and didn't give it any further thought. Guess I'm guilty of that. > Our expectation when we submitted the proposal was that the initial set of > committers would comprise the people who have initially contributed to get > the current code to this stage, and we were not expecting arbitrary requests > to join the initial list of committers. While "jumping in" is - as we've already established - in bad taste, I *think* that (most|any|some) projects entering incubation should expect such requests. Part of the focus of the incubator, as I've understood it, is to promote sufficient diversity in the community and the team, that no one "block" of people can kill the project by dropping out or whatever. Having new initial committers that have no outstanding connection to the project is one way to achieve that. In this regard, the incubation period is radically different from other times in the project lifecycle. Or, again, that has been my understanding. Then again, maybe it only appears that way because some projects make it a point to appeal to people *to* join in as initial committers. > Of course, as a potential Apache > project (now potentially incubator, but looking forward to being TLP in the > future), we are ready to work towards building a community, which includes > granting the status of committer to contributors. However, we'd like new > committers to earn their status by showing commitment to the community and > demonstrating technical merit. Absolutely, and entering the incubator is the only time - AFAIK - that projects here tend to take a slightly different stance. It's all about seeding the initial pool before the project gets underway. That said, I'm not sure projects are required to accept an additional initial committers beyond what the proposer suggests. For my own part, I'll just say that I'm excited about S4, very happy to volunteer to help, and if you guys want me, I'm in. If not, take me off the list and it'll all be cool. FSM knows, I have plenty of stuff to keep me occupied already. ;-) As far as introduction goes... Well, I founded Fogbeam Labs, started the ScrewPile project to develop an OSS suite of Enterprise Knowledge Management software. I've been a professional software engineer for the past 12-13 years, working mostly in Java, but some C, C++, Python and Groovy as well. If anyone wants to know more about me, just ask, or see: https://plus.google.com/u/1/114301088526097505896/about Cheers, Phil - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator
Phil and all, Great discussion and so happy you want to join the team. No need to apologize !! My feeling is that if someone wants to join the project as a contributor and has technical merit he or she will become a committer pretty quickly. I think that having a minimal protocol is useful to make sure people get to know each other and the project. In fact, the current policy seems good to me: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/participation.html I love the DO-ocracy concept and seems to be the best way to become a committer. So I propose that those who are interested and can volunteer some time, start thinking on how to contribute. If the project is accepted we will discuss the details in the mailing list. Thanks again! -leo On Sep 15, 2011, at 5:54 PM, Phillip Rhodes wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: >> >> I have read the guide to participation: >> >>http://incubator.apache.org/guides/participation.html >> >> and I understand from there that people shouldn't simply jump in as an >> initial committer without a short introduction and without acknowledgment >> from the proposer. > > Since I was one of those people, let me issue a "mea culpa" here. Despite > having read the participation guidelines (more than once even) I apparently > slipped into a bit of a conditioned response, from observed behavior. For > better or worse, it has become not uncommon (in my experience) to see > people simply "jump in" and add themselves. In retrospect, yes, it probably > is a bit rude, and I apologize for my part in this. > > I suppose t's just what Roy said in 2006: everybody > saw a certain process appearing to happen, assumed it was policy and > didn't give it any further thought. Guess I'm guilty of that. > > >> Our expectation when we submitted the proposal was that the initial set of >> committers would comprise the people who have initially contributed to get >> the current code to this stage, and we were not expecting arbitrary requests >> to join the initial list of committers. > > While "jumping in" is - as we've already established - in bad taste, I > *think* that > (most|any|some) projects entering incubation should expect such requests. > Part of the focus of the incubator, as I've understood it, is to > promote sufficient > diversity in the community and the team, that no one "block" of people can > kill > the project by dropping out or whatever. Having new initial > committers that have > no outstanding connection to the project is one way to achieve that. > In this regard, the > incubation period is radically different from other times in the > project lifecycle. > Or, again, that has been my understanding. > > Then again, maybe it only appears that way because some projects make > it a point to > appeal to people *to* join in as initial committers. > >> Of course, as a potential Apache >> project (now potentially incubator, but looking forward to being TLP in the >> future), we are ready to work towards building a community, which includes >> granting the status of committer to contributors. However, we'd like new >> committers to earn their status by showing commitment to the community and >> demonstrating technical merit. > > Absolutely, and entering the incubator is the only time - AFAIK - that > projects > here tend to take a slightly different stance. It's all about seeding > the initial pool > before the project gets underway. That said, I'm not sure projects > are required > to accept an additional initial committers beyond what the proposer suggests. > > > For my own part, I'll just say that I'm excited about S4, very happy > to volunteer to help, and > if you guys want me, I'm in. If not, take me off the list and it'll > all be cool. FSM knows, I have > plenty of stuff to keep me occupied already. ;-) > > As far as introduction goes... Well, I founded Fogbeam Labs, started > the ScrewPile project to > develop an OSS suite of Enterprise Knowledge Management software. > I've been a professional > software engineer for the past 12-13 years, working mostly in Java, > but some C, C++, Python > and Groovy as well. If anyone wants to know more about me, just ask, > or see: https://plus.google.com/u/1/114301088526097505896/about > > > Cheers, > > > Phil > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator
Hi Phillip, Thanks for your feedback, see some more comments below: On Sep 16, 2011, at 2:54 AM, Phillip Rhodes wrote: Our expectation when we submitted the proposal was that the initial set of committers would comprise the people who have initially contributed to get the current code to this stage, and we were not expecting arbitrary requests to join the initial list of committers. Part of the focus of the incubator, as I've understood it, is to promote sufficient diversity in the community and the team, that no one "block" of people can kill the project by dropping out or whatever. Having new initial committers that have no outstanding connection to the project is one way to achieve that. In this regard, the incubation period is radically different from other times in the project lifecycle. Or, again, that has been my understanding. I tend to agree with this observation that it is important to increase diversity when the initial group is too homogeneous. However, I don't see this risk with the group we proposed originally, we are coming from different companies, and our interests converge to S4, but overall I would say that our motivations are pretty different. Then again, maybe it only appears that way because some projects make it a point to appeal to people *to* join in as initial committers. Of course, as a potential Apache project (now potentially incubator, but looking forward to being TLP in the future), we are ready to work towards building a community, which includes granting the status of committer to contributors. However, we'd like new committers to earn their status by showing commitment to the community and demonstrating technical merit. Absolutely, and entering the incubator is the only time - AFAIK - that projects here tend to take a slightly different stance. It's all about seeding the initial pool before the project gets underway. That said, I'm not sure projects are required to accept an additional initial committers beyond what the proposer suggests. To emphasize, just in the case it was not extra clear in the previous message, it is not that we don't want new committers, but our preference, assuming it doesn't go against the principles stated by the community, is to grant committership status once we get to work a little longer together. For my own part, I'll just say that I'm excited about S4, very happy to volunteer to help, and if you guys want me, I'm in. If not, take me off the list and it'll all be cool. FSM knows, I have plenty of stuff to keep me occupied already. ;-) I'm sure you're busy and have other things to do, but that was not the point. We want to get all help we can to make sure S4 succeeds in building a strong community. We just feel that committership is a separate issue and should be earned. As far as introduction goes... Well, I founded Fogbeam Labs, started the ScrewPile project to develop an OSS suite of Enterprise Knowledge Management software. I've been a professional software engineer for the past 12-13 years, working mostly in Java, but some C, C++, Python and Groovy as well. If anyone wants to know more about me, just ask, or see: https://plus.google.com/u/1/114301088526097505896/about Thanks again, Phillip. We are looking forward to working with you, so please consider contributing independent of the committership issue. Cheers, -Flavio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator
Great addition to Apache, +1. Some comments on the proposal: - In the "Initial Goals" section, you referred to "Add a cluster management system". Not sure of what it entirely means, but if it is what I think it is, the new resource-management layer in Hadoop (YARN/ JIRA issue MAPREDUCE-279) can be leveraged for this. YARN is going to be available in Hadoop 0.23 release. Willing to help in this regard in any way possible if you think it makes sense for S4, can have a separate discussion too. - You may want to capture the discussion about Hdaoop/Flume/Kafka in the "Relationships with Other Apache Projects" section. - Seen elsewhere that proposals list down the list of companies of the initial set of committers (section "Homogeneous Developers"). Thanks, +Vinod On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:49 AM, Leo Neumeyer wrote: > Dear all, > > I would like to propose S4 to be an Apache Incubator project. S4 is a > distributed streaming platform written in Java. > > Here is a link to the proposal in the Incubator wiki: > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/S4Proposal > > Thanks, > Leo Neumeyer > > http://s4.io > http://twitter.com/leoneu > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator
Hi Vinod, Thanks for the support and comments. See my more comments below: On Sep 18, 2011, at 6:55 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli wrote: Great addition to Apache, +1. Some comments on the proposal: - In the "Initial Goals" section, you referred to "Add a cluster management system". Not sure of what it entirely means, but if it is what I think it is, the new resource-management layer in Hadoop (YARN/ JIRA issue MAPREDUCE-279) can be leveraged for this. YARN is going to be available in Hadoop 0.23 release. Willing to help in this regard in any way possible if you think it makes sense for S4, can have a separate discussion too. To give you an idea of what we have in mind, here are a few points: - Monitor Nodes and PEs. - Ability to query specific PE instance variables. - Add remove nodes. - Monitor logs. - Monitor CPU/Memory usage per node. - Load/unload apps. In general, it sounds right to assess if it is viable to use YARN for S4 cluster management and we would appreciate your help. If it is ok with you, I'd rather not include it in the proposal, though, since it is an issue we could consider independently of the project going into incubator. Let me know if you agree. - You may want to capture the discussion about Hdaoop/Flume/Kafka in the "Relationships with Other Apache Projects" section. I have added a summary to the proposal, thanks for pointing it out. - Seen elsewhere that proposals list down the list of companies of the initial set of committers (section "Homogeneous Developers"). I have also added a list here. -Flavio On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:49 AM, Leo Neumeyer wrote: Dear all, I would like to propose S4 to be an Apache Incubator project. S4 is a distributed streaming platform written in Java. Here is a link to the proposal in the Incubator wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/S4Proposal Thanks, Leo Neumeyer http://s4.io http://twitter.com/leoneu - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: > To give you an idea of what we have in mind, here are a few points: > > - Monitor Nodes and PEs. > - Ability to query specific PE instance variables. > - Add remove nodes. > - Monitor logs. > - Monitor CPU/Memory usage per node. > - Load/unload apps. > It does look like some of the resource management can be offloaded to YARN. > In general, it sounds right to assess if it is viable to use YARN for S4 > cluster management and we would appreciate your help. If it is ok with you, > I'd rather not include it in the proposal, though, since it is an issue we > could consider independently of the project going into incubator. Let me > know if you agree. > Definitely. Thanks, +Vinod
Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator
There are currently only 2 mentors volunteering to help out (Owen and myself), would be great to have 3+ -- any IPMC members out there that could help with the mentoring effort? Regards, Patrick On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: > >> To give you an idea of what we have in mind, here are a few points: >> >> - Monitor Nodes and PEs. >> - Ability to query specific PE instance variables. >> - Add remove nodes. >> - Monitor logs. >> - Monitor CPU/Memory usage per node. >> - Load/unload apps. >> > > > It does look like some of the resource management can be offloaded to YARN. > > > >> In general, it sounds right to assess if it is viable to use YARN for S4 >> cluster management and we would appreciate your help. If it is ok with you, >> I'd rather not include it in the proposal, though, since it is an issue we >> could consider independently of the project going into incubator. Let me >> know if you agree. >> > > > Definitely. > > Thanks, > +Vinod > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator
Happy to help mentor S4. Arun On Sep 20, 2011, at 9:13 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > There are currently only 2 mentors volunteering to help out (Owen and > myself), would be great to have 3+ -- any IPMC members out there that > could help with the mentoring effort? > > Regards, > > Patrick > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli > wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: >> >>> To give you an idea of what we have in mind, here are a few points: >>> >>> - Monitor Nodes and PEs. >>> - Ability to query specific PE instance variables. >>> - Add remove nodes. >>> - Monitor logs. >>> - Monitor CPU/Memory usage per node. >>> - Load/unload apps. >>> >> >> >> It does look like some of the resource management can be offloaded to YARN. >> >> >> >>> In general, it sounds right to assess if it is viable to use YARN for S4 >>> cluster management and we would appreciate your help. If it is ok with you, >>> I'd rather not include it in the proposal, though, since it is an issue we >>> could consider independently of the project going into incubator. Let me >>> know if you agree. >>> >> >> >> Definitely. >> >> Thanks, >> +Vinod >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [PROPOSAL] S4 for the Apache Incubator
Thanks, Arun. I'm happy to have you on board! -Flavio On Sep 20, 2011, at 6:55 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: Happy to help mentor S4. Arun On Sep 20, 2011, at 9:13 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: There are currently only 2 mentors volunteering to help out (Owen and myself), would be great to have 3+ -- any IPMC members out there that could help with the mentoring effort? Regards, Patrick On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli wrote: On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: To give you an idea of what we have in mind, here are a few points: - Monitor Nodes and PEs. - Ability to query specific PE instance variables. - Add remove nodes. - Monitor logs. - Monitor CPU/Memory usage per node. - Load/unload apps. It does look like some of the resource management can be offloaded to YARN. In general, it sounds right to assess if it is viable to use YARN for S4 cluster management and we would appreciate your help. If it is ok with you, I'd rather not include it in the proposal, though, since it is an issue we could consider independently of the project going into incubator. Let me know if you agree. Definitely. Thanks, +Vinod - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org