RE: [VOTE] Approve release of Ivy 2.0.0-alpha2-incubating

2007-07-19 Thread Gilles Scokart
+1 (non binding)

Gilles

 -Original Message-
 From: Xavier Hanin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: lundi 16 juillet 2007 19:18
 To: general@incubator.apache.org
 Subject: [VOTE] Approve release of Ivy 2.0.0-alpha2-incubating
 
 We held a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] to publish a second
 alpha release of Ivy.
 The vote email thread is available here:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/ivy-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg01175.htmlhttp://www.mail-archive.com/ivy-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00685.html
 
 In summary we have 4 +1 votes from PPMC members,
 and no 0s or -1s.
 
 We would like to request approval from the Incubator PMC to release this
 version.
 
 The candidate distribution is available, together with KEYS used to sign
 the
 release here:
 http://people.apache.org/%7Exavier/ivy/staging/2.0.0-alpha-1-incubating/
 http://people.apache.org/~xavier/ivy/staging/2.0.0-alpha2-
 incubating/http://people.apache.org/%7Exavier/ivy/staging/2.0.0-alpha2-
 incubating/http://people.apache.org/%7Exavier/ivy/staging/2.0.0-alpha-1-
 incubating/
 
 The build is based on:
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ivy/core/branches/2.0.0-alpha-
 1/
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ivy/core/branches/2.0.0-
 alpha2/https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ivy/core/branches/2.0.0
 -alpha-1/
 
 Cheers,
 
 Xavier
 --
 Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant
 http://xhab.blogspot.com/
 http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/
 http://www.xoocode.org/


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Approve release of Ivy 2.0.0-alpha2-incubating

2007-07-18 Thread robert burrell donkin

On 7/18/07, Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On 7/17/07, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


snip


i prefer source distributions to unpack to a different directory
 (apache-ivy-1.2.3-src, say) from the binary distribution. there is an
 alternative school of thought but this means that unpacking over the
 top needs to form a harmonious overlay.


It sounds like a good idea. We'll discuss that further on [EMAIL PROTECTED],
feel free to join if you want to defend your opinion :-)


roy feels the opposite and argues strongly for the overlay theory.
searching this list will probably give a good summary of the opposing
arguments. that should give a good starting point for the
discussion...

- robert

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Approve release of Ivy 2.0.0-alpha2-incubating

2007-07-17 Thread Niclas Hedhman

+1, as I can't find any additional issues other than what has already been 
mentioned. Looking forward to the release.


Cheers
-- 
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer

I  live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I  work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Approve release of Ivy 2.0.0-alpha2-incubating

2007-07-16 Thread ant elder

On 7/16/07, Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


We held a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] to publish a second
alpha release of Ivy.
The vote email thread is available here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg01175.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00685.html

In summary we have 4 +1 votes from PPMC members,
and no 0s or -1s.

We would like to request approval from the Incubator PMC to release this
version.

The candidate distribution is available, together with KEYS used to sign
the
release here:
http://people.apache.org/%7Exavier/ivy/staging/2.0.0-alpha-1-incubating/
http://people.apache.org/~xavier/ivy/staging/2.0.0-alpha2-incubating/
http://people.apache.org/%7Exavier/ivy/staging/2.0.0-alpha2-incubating/
http://people.apache.org/%7Exavier/ivy/staging/2.0.0-alpha-1-incubating/

The build is based on:

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ivy/core/branches/2.0.0-alpha-1/

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ivy/core/branches/2.0.0-alpha2/

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ivy/core/branches/2.0.0-alpha-1/


Cheers,

Xavier
--
Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant
http://xhab.blogspot.com/
http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/
http://www.xoocode.org/



+1, looks ok to me.

There's one missing license header in the src distro on IvyTaskTest.java,
and I think its now preferred to include all licenses in the one LICENSE
file instead of having the separate LICENSE.jquery and LICENSE.jsch files,
but neither of those things are blockers.

  ...ant


Re: [VOTE] Approve release of Ivy 2.0.0-alpha2-incubating

2007-07-16 Thread Xavier Hanin

On 7/16/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


On 7/16/07, Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 We held a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] to publish a second
 alpha release of Ivy.
 The vote email thread is available here:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg01175.html
 http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00685.html

 In summary we have 4 +1 votes from PPMC members,
 and no 0s or -1s.

 We would like to request approval from the Incubator PMC to release this
 version.

 The candidate distribution is available, together with KEYS used to sign
 the
 release here:
 
http://people.apache.org/%7Exavier/ivy/staging/2.0.0-alpha-1-incubating/
 http://people.apache.org/~xavier/ivy/staging/2.0.0-alpha2-incubating/
 http://people.apache.org/%7Exavier/ivy/staging/2.0.0-alpha2-incubating/

 http://people.apache.org/%7Exavier/ivy/staging/2.0.0-alpha-1-incubating/


 The build is based on:
 

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ivy/core/branches/2.0.0-alpha-1/
 

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ivy/core/branches/2.0.0-alpha2/
 

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ivy/core/branches/2.0.0-alpha-1/
 

 Cheers,

 Xavier
 --
 Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant
 http://xhab.blogspot.com/
 http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/
 http://www.xoocode.org/


+1, looks ok to me.

There's one missing license header in the src distro on IvyTaskTest.java,



Good catch, I missed this one. I'll update it for next release.

and I think its now preferred to include all licenses in the one LICENSE

file instead of having the separate LICENSE.jquery and LICENSE.jsch files,
but neither of those things are blockers.



I took example on Ant, but I will put everything in the LICENSE file for
next release.

Thanks for your time and your vote.

Xavier

  ...ant






--
Xavier Hanin - Independent Java Consultant
http://xhab.blogspot.com/
http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/
http://www.xoocode.org/