Re: [OO.o] updated mailing lists in proposal
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: According to Markmail (http://openoffice.markmail.org/) the following 37 openoffice.org mailing lists received more than 365 messages in 2010: Based on the volume here over the last week, how many of those lists got all 365 messages in one day? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [OO.o] updated mailing lists in proposal
Hi, Am 07.06.2011 20:30, schrieb Donald Whytock: On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Jukka Zittingjukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: According to Markmail (http://openoffice.markmail.org/) the following 37 openoffice.org mailing lists received more than 365 messages in 2010: Based on the volume here over the last week, how many of those lists got all 365 messages in one day? although there are mailing lists with typical peaks at OOo (qa an release lists short before release, user lists short after relase) as well as some with only seasonal use (conference planning lists) none of the lists would have such extreme peaks as you see here. It is only that you have at a rather low-traffic apache list guests who are used to discuss on high-traffic lists. And discussion is often with lots of emotion (but seems to clam down). regards, André - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [OO.o] updated mailing lists in proposal
2011/6/7 André Schnabel andre.schna...@gmx.net It is only that you have at a rather low-traffic apache list guests who are used to discuss on high-traffic lists. And discussion is often with lots of emotion (but seems to clam down). Ah, nostalgia, it's just like the good old days on the OOo marketing list :-) “Nothing great in the world has ever been accomplished without passion.” (Hebbel 1813-1863). -- Ian Ofqual Accredited IT Qualifications (The Schools ITQ) www.theINGOTs.org +44 (0)1827 305940 The Learning Machine Limited, Reg Office, 36 Ashby Road, Tamworth, Staffordshire, B79 8AQ. Reg No: 05560797, Registered in England and Wales.
Re: [OO.o] updated mailing lists in proposal
Hi, On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 3:16 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: On 6/5/2011 7:13 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: There are 146 projects listed on OpenOffice.org - all with mailing lists. Last time I read the proposal, it wasn't clear how many of these are active and being brought across. It does suggest though that a single dev list is not sufficient. Can you break these down into the number of projects generating 1 message per day? According to Markmail (http://openoffice.markmail.org/) the following 37 openoffice.org mailing lists received more than 365 messages in 2010: 1) org.openoffice.allbugs 61,312 2) org.openoffice.users 7,780 3) org.openoffice.de.users 6,215 4) org.openoffice.fr.users 4,318 5) org.openoffice.allcvs 3,136 6) org.openoffice.de.dev 2,943 7) org.openoffice.marketing.dev 2,281 8) org.openoffice.user-faq.authors 2,204 9) org.openoffice.dev2,171 10) org.openoffice.discuss1,809 11) org.openoffice.l10n.dev 1,787 12) org.openoffice.fr.qa-test 1,694 13) org.openoffice.br-pt.usuarios 1,439 14) org.openoffice.it.utenti 1,426 15) org.openoffice.releases 1,407 16) org.openoffice.ja.translate 1,308 17) org.openoffice.es.discuss_es 1,281 18) org.openoffice.api.dev1,030 19) org.openoffice.it.localizzazione 1,012 20) org.openoffice.cws-announce 950 21) org.openoffice.ux.discuss 819 22) org.openoffice.qa.dev 717 23) org.openoffice.es.users 668 24) org.openoffice.fr.discuss 598 25) org.openoffice.website.dev 553 26) org.openoffice.es.dev 550 27) org.openoffice.distribution.dev 524 28) org.openoffice.de.qa523 29) org.openoffice.documentation.dev510 30) org.openoffice.nl.gebruikers473 31) org.openoffice.fr.dev 460 32) org.openoffice.dba.needsconfirm 446 33) org.openoffice.ja.discuss 429 34) org.openoffice.de.cdrom 428 35) org.openoffice.dba.dev 372 36) org.openoffice.l10n.tools 372 37) org.openoffice.native-lang.dev 370 BR, Jukka Zitting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [OO.o] updated mailing lists in proposal
Hi, 2011/6/6 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com: On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 3:16 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: On 6/5/2011 7:13 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: There are 146 projects listed on OpenOffice.org - all with mailing lists. Last time I read the proposal, it wasn't clear how many of these are active and being brought across. It does suggest though that a single dev list is not sufficient. Can you break these down into the number of projects generating 1 message per day? According to Markmail (http://openoffice.markmail.org/) the following 37 openoffice.org mailing lists received more than 365 messages in 2010: These are generated lists: 1) org.openoffice.allbugs 61,312 5) org.openoffice.allcvs 3,136 20) org.openoffice.cws-announce 950 32) org.openoffice.dba.needsconfirm 446 Please take also in account that most of the community went away at least in october 2010 and most lists are dead since then. Volker -- Volker Merschmann Member of The Document Foundation http://www.documentfoundation.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [OO.o] updated mailing lists in proposal
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: I just updated the proposal to provide more detail on the requested mailing lists. Figured it would be good to discuss here. This is what I entered into the wiki: The following mailing lists: oo-...@incubator.apache.org - for developer discussions oo-comm...@incubator.apache.org - for Subversion commit messages oo-iss...@incubator.apache.org - for JIRA change notifications oo-notificati...@incubator.apache.org - for continuous build/test notifications Note: a users mailing is not being requested at this time. It is anticipated that users will interact with the community through existing OpenOffice.org systems. OpenOffice.org official contaction is 'OOo' not 'oo' I think is enough time to correct these mailing lists. I wrote a more lenghty email but I think the discussions should be better understood by Apache admins. In particular, note the lack of a users mailing list. I don't think we'd want one to start, but may want it after a release is made during incubation. Thoughts? The other four lists are pretty standard for Apache projects. Feedback most welcome! Cheers, -g - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org -- *Alexandro Colorado* *OpenOffice.org* Español http://es.openoffice.org
Re: [OO.o] updated mailing lists in proposal
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: I just updated the proposal to provide more detail on the requested mailing lists. Figured it would be good to discuss here. This is what I entered into the wiki: The following mailing lists: oo-...@incubator.apache.org - for developer discussions oo-comm...@incubator.apache.org - for Subversion commit messages oo-iss...@incubator.apache.org - for JIRA change notifications oo-notificati...@incubator.apache.org - for continuous build/test notifications Note: a users mailing is not being requested at this time. It is anticipated that users will interact with the community through existing OpenOffice.org systems. In particular, note the lack of a users mailing list. I don't think we'd want one to start, but may want it after a release is made during incubation. Thoughts? There are 146 projects listed on OpenOffice.org - all with mailing lists. Last time I read the proposal, it wasn't clear how many of these are active and being brought across. It does suggest though that a single dev list is not sufficient. Niall The other four lists are pretty standard for Apache projects. Feedback most welcome! Cheers, -g - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [OO.o] updated mailing lists in proposal
Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote on 06/05/2011 07:55:34 PM: I just updated the proposal to provide more detail on the requested mailing lists. Figured it would be good to discuss here. This is what I entered into the wiki: The following mailing lists: oo-...@incubator.apache.org - for developer discussions oo-comm...@incubator.apache.org - for Subversion commit messages oo-iss...@incubator.apache.org - for JIRA change notifications oo-notificati...@incubator.apache.org - for continuous build/test notifications Note: a users mailing is not being requested at this time. It is anticipated that users will interact with the community through existing OpenOffice.org systems. In particular, note the lack of a users mailing list. I don't think we'd want one to start, but may want it after a release is made during incubation. Thoughts? The other four lists are pretty standard for Apache projects. Feedback most welcome! Could you review what user services Apache projects typically provide? I assume it is one or more mailing lists, a bug tracker, and a release repository. Anything else? User-facing blogs? Forums, i.e., non-mail enabled by default, as opposed to mailing lists? In the initial discussions the thought was to divide the project web presence from the end-user web presence. Reasons for this include the many thousands of inbound links to OpenOffice.org. But some systems need to be easily accessible to both users and project members, e.g., the bug tracker. More than one way to do this, but it would be good to know the range of what is possible at Apache. -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [OO.o] updated mailing lists in proposal
Hi all Because this is my first mail, I give a short introduction to myself. I'm Raphael Bircher from Switzerland. I contribute for OOo since 5 years as QA and in same other tecnical parts. I was involved by the migration to the kenai Infrastructur, and I'm willing to help by seting up the new infrastructure, if this help is welcome from the ASF side. Am 06.06.11 02:13, schrieb Niall Pemberton: On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Greg Steingst...@gmail.com wrote: I just updated the proposal to provide more detail on the requested mailing lists. Figured it would be good to discuss here. This is what I entered into the wiki: The following mailing lists: oo-...@incubator.apache.org - for developer discussions oo-comm...@incubator.apache.org - for Subversion commit messages oo-iss...@incubator.apache.org - for JIRA change notifications oo-notificati...@incubator.apache.org - for continuous build/test notifications Note: a users mailing is not being requested at this time. It is anticipated that users will interact with the community through existing OpenOffice.org systems. In particular, note the lack of a users mailing list. I don't think we'd want one to start, but may want it after a release is made during incubation. Thoughts? There are 146 projects listed on OpenOffice.org - all with mailing lists. Last time I read the proposal, it wasn't clear how many of these are active and being brought across. It does suggest though that a single dev list is not sufficient. We have many many lists, a load of this lists are dead. Anyway, The 4 lists are ok, if this is onli for the startup while the kenai infrastructure from Oracle is running. If we realy switch to apache, we need much more ML, e.g for native language projects, etc. Greetings Raphael -- My private Homepage: http://www.raphaelbircher.ch/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [OO.o] updated mailing lists in proposal
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 20:07, Alexandro Colorado j...@openoffice.org wrote: On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: I just updated the proposal to provide more detail on the requested mailing lists. Figured it would be good to discuss here. This is what I entered into the wiki: The following mailing lists: oo-...@incubator.apache.org - for developer discussions oo-comm...@incubator.apache.org - for Subversion commit messages oo-iss...@incubator.apache.org - for JIRA change notifications oo-notificati...@incubator.apache.org - for continuous build/test notifications Note: a users mailing is not being requested at this time. It is anticipated that users will interact with the community through existing OpenOffice.org systems. OpenOffice.org official contaction is 'OOo' not 'oo' I think is enough time to correct these mailing lists. I wrote a more lenghty email but I think the discussions should be better understood by Apache admins. The mailing lists haven't been constructed yet. We can easily change the request to ooo-*. I was just trying to keep the names short :-) Opinions, people? Should they be oo-* or ooo-*? (the former could work if we call it Apache OpenOffice) Cheers, -g - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [OO.o] updated mailing lists in proposal
acolor...@gmail.com wrote on 06/05/2011 08:07:29 PM: OpenOffice.org official contaction is 'OOo' not 'oo' I think is enough time to correct these mailing lists. I wrote a more lenghty email but I think the discussions should be better understood by Apache admins. +1 Since this is question that is pervasive in the project, I'd recommend that after this proposal is accepted, that there be a consultation with ASF Legal Affairs on the trademark *before* any project infrastructure is created. -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [OO.o] updated mailing lists in proposal
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 20:47, Raphael Bircher r.birc...@gmx.ch wrote: Hi all Because this is my first mail, I give a short introduction to myself. I'm Raphael Bircher from Switzerland. I contribute for OOo since 5 years as QA and in same other tecnical parts. I was involved by the migration to the kenai Infrastructur, and I'm willing to help by seting up the new infrastructure, if this help is welcome from the ASF side. Welcome! If you're interested in infrastructure, then Joe Schaefer recommended joining the infrastruct...@apache.org mailing list[1]. Am 06.06.11 02:13, schrieb Niall Pemberton: On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Greg Steingst...@gmail.com wrote: ... There are 146 projects listed on OpenOffice.org - all with mailing lists. Last time I read the proposal, it wasn't clear how many of these are active and being brought across. It does suggest though that a single dev list is not sufficient. We have many many lists, a load of this lists are dead. Anyway, The 4 lists are ok, if this is onli for the startup while the kenai infrastructure from Oracle is running. If we realy switch to apache, we need much more ML, e.g for native language projects, etc. That was my thought, too. Also note that we're talking about an initial committer list of around 40-50 people (it is approaching 40 now). That many people can easily work on a single list. And yeah... over time, more lists can be constructed as necessary. We're just talking about the initial set. And similar to you, I feel pretty strong about keeping it minimal. Separating across too many lists might lose the necessary critical mass. Cheers, -g [1] send mail to infrastructure-subscr...@apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [OO.o] updated mailing lists in proposal
FWIW, renaming our lists is largely a scripted operation. I wouldn't hold up creation of mailing lists simply because we can't figure out what the best names for them are. - Original Message From: robert_w...@us.ibm.com robert_w...@us.ibm.com To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Sun, June 5, 2011 8:53:25 PM Subject: Re: [OO.o] updated mailing lists in proposal acolor...@gmail.com wrote on 06/05/2011 08:07:29 PM: OpenOffice.org official contaction is 'OOo' not 'oo' I think is enough time to correct these mailing lists. I wrote a more lenghty email but I think the discussions should be better understood by Apache admins. +1 Since this is question that is pervasive in the project, I'd recommend that after this proposal is accepted, that there be a consultation with ASF Legal Affairs on the trademark *before* any project infrastructure is created. -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [OO.o] updated mailing lists in proposal
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 8:53 PM, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote: acolor...@gmail.com wrote on 06/05/2011 08:07:29 PM: OpenOffice.org official contaction is 'OOo' not 'oo' I think is enough time to correct these mailing lists. I wrote a more lenghty email but I think the discussions should be better understood by Apache admins. +1 Since this is question that is pervasive in the project, I'd recommend that after this proposal is accepted, that there be a consultation with ASF Legal Affairs on the trademark *before* any project infrastructure is created. Mention that in the proposal. -Rob - Sam Ruby - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [OO.o] updated mailing lists in proposal
Greg Stein wrote: On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 20:07, Alexandro Coloradoj...@openoffice.org wrote: On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Greg Steingst...@gmail.com wrote: I just updated the proposal to provide more detail on the requested mailing lists. Figured it would be good to discuss here. This is what I entered into the wiki: The following mailing lists: oo-...@incubator.apache.org - for developer discussions oo-comm...@incubator.apache.org - for Subversion commit messages oo-iss...@incubator.apache.org - for JIRA change notifications oo-notificati...@incubator.apache.org - for continuous build/test notifications Note: a users mailing is not being requested at this time. It is anticipated that users will interact with the community through existing OpenOffice.org systems. OpenOffice.org official contaction is 'OOo' not 'oo' I think is enough time to correct these mailing lists. I wrote a more lenghty email but I think the discussions should be better understood by Apache admins. The mailing lists haven't been constructed yet. We can easily change the request to ooo-*. I was just trying to keep the names short :-) Opinions, people? Should they be oo-* or ooo-*? (the former could work if we call it Apache OpenOffice) Cheers, -g I have to agree with Alexandro on this. The OpenOffice.org (OOo or ooo) has long be established and it will be very confusing to users to change now. For internal use the oo-* may work but feel that it maybe best to use ooo-* as new people come aboard. Even the Apache OpenOffice will cause confusion. Just my 2cents. Andy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [OO.o] updated mailing lists in proposal
Am 06.06.11 02:55, schrieb Greg Stein: On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 20:47, Raphael Bircherr.birc...@gmx.ch wrote: Hi all Because this is my first mail, I give a short introduction to myself. I'm Raphael Bircher from Switzerland. I contribute for OOo since 5 years as QA and in same other tecnical parts. I was involved by the migration to the kenai Infrastructur, and I'm willing to help by seting up the new infrastructure, if this help is welcome from the ASF side. Welcome! If you're interested in infrastructure, then Joe Schaefer recommended joining the infrastruct...@apache.org mailing list[1]. As I hav not enough lists ;-) No, I will subscribe it. Am 06.06.11 02:13, schrieb Niall Pemberton: On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Greg Steingst...@gmail.comwrote: ... There are 146 projects listed on OpenOffice.org - all with mailing lists. Last time I read the proposal, it wasn't clear how many of these are active and being brought across. It does suggest though that a single dev list is not sufficient. We have many many lists, a load of this lists are dead. Anyway, The 4 lists are ok, if this is onli for the startup while the kenai infrastructure from Oracle is running. If we realy switch to apache, we need much more ML, e.g for native language projects, etc. That was my thought, too. Also note that we're talking about an initial committer list of around 40-50 people (it is approaching 40 now). That many people can easily work on a single list. And yeah... over time, more lists can be constructed as necessary. We're just talking about the initial set. In fact, I think, there are many more. The project is big end many people does not know that they should list themself to the initial proposal. And similar to you, I feel pretty strong about keeping it minimal. Separating across too many lists might lose the necessary critical mass. Yes, but a list with hunderts of mails per day is not realy funny too ;-) Greetings Raphael -- My private Homepage: http://www.raphaelbircher.ch/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [OO.o] updated mailing lists in proposal
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 21:03, Andy Brown a...@the-martin-byrd.net wrote: Greg Stein wrote: On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 20:07, Alexandro Coloradoj...@openoffice.org wrote: On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Greg Steingst...@gmail.com wrote: I just updated the proposal to provide more detail on the requested mailing lists. Figured it would be good to discuss here. This is what I entered into the wiki: The following mailing lists: oo-...@incubator.apache.org - for developer discussions oo-comm...@incubator.apache.org - for Subversion commit messages oo-iss...@incubator.apache.org - for JIRA change notifications oo-notificati...@incubator.apache.org - for continuous build/test notifications Note: a users mailing is not being requested at this time. It is anticipated that users will interact with the community through existing OpenOffice.org systems. OpenOffice.org official contaction is 'OOo' not 'oo' I think is enough time to correct these mailing lists. I wrote a more lenghty email but I think the discussions should be better understood by Apache admins. The mailing lists haven't been constructed yet. We can easily change the request to ooo-*. I was just trying to keep the names short :-) Opinions, people? Should they be oo-* or ooo-*? (the former could work if we call it Apache OpenOffice) Cheers, -g I have to agree with Alexandro on this. The OpenOffice.org (OOo or ooo) has long be established and it will be very confusing to users to change now. For internal use the oo-* may work but feel that it maybe best to use ooo-* as new people come aboard. Even the Apache OpenOffice will cause confusion. I just went to update the wiki to switch to the ooo- convention, and somebody beat me to it :-D My intent was to keep it as short as possible, but precedent is better. Thanks, -g - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [OO.o] updated mailing lists in proposal
robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote on Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 20:37:01 -0400: Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote on 06/05/2011 07:55:34 PM: I just updated the proposal to provide more detail on the requested mailing lists. Figured it would be good to discuss here. This is what I entered into the wiki: The following mailing lists: oo-...@incubator.apache.org - for developer discussions oo-comm...@incubator.apache.org - for Subversion commit messages oo-iss...@incubator.apache.org - for JIRA change notifications oo-notificati...@incubator.apache.org - for continuous build/test notifications Note: a users mailing is not being requested at this time. It is anticipated that users will interact with the community through existing OpenOffice.org systems. In particular, note the lack of a users mailing list. I don't think we'd want one to start, but may want it after a release is made during incubation. Thoughts? The other four lists are pretty standard for Apache projects. Feedback most welcome! Could you review what user services Apache projects typically provide? I assume it is one or more mailing lists, a bug tracker, and a release repository. Anything else? User-facing blogs? Forums, i.e., non-mail enabled by default, as opposed to mailing lists? Per-project blogs on blogs.a.o. No non-mail forums. trademarks@ and press@ support on those lists. Not sure about anything else at his time of the night^Wmorning. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [OO.o] updated mailing lists in proposal
On 6/5/2011 7:13 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote: I just updated the proposal to provide more detail on the requested mailing lists. Figured it would be good to discuss here. This is what I entered into the wiki: The following mailing lists: oo-...@incubator.apache.org - for developer discussions oo-comm...@incubator.apache.org - for Subversion commit messages oo-iss...@incubator.apache.org - for JIRA change notifications oo-notificati...@incubator.apache.org - for continuous build/test notifications Note: a users mailing is not being requested at this time. It is anticipated that users will interact with the community through existing OpenOffice.org systems. In particular, note the lack of a users mailing list. I don't think we'd want one to start, but may want it after a release is made during incubation. Thoughts? There are 146 projects listed on OpenOffice.org - all with mailing lists. Last time I read the proposal, it wasn't clear how many of these are active and being brought across. It does suggest though that a single dev list is not sufficient. Can you break these down into the number of projects generating 1 message per day? Likely there can be a bunch of efficiency here in only creating sublists for the highest traffic topics. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [OO.o] updated mailing lists in proposal
Raphael Bircher r.birc...@gmx.ch wrote on 06/05/2011 08:47:42 PM: Because this is my first mail, I give a short introduction to myself. I'm Raphael Bircher from Switzerland. I contribute for OOo since 5 years as QA and in same other tecnical parts. I was involved by the migration to the kenai Infrastructur, and I'm willing to help by seting up the new infrastructure, if this help is welcome from the ASF side. Thanks, and welcome aboard! Expertise like yours will be essential to the success of the migration and initial setup work. -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [OO.o] updated mailing lists in proposal
sa3r...@gmail.com wrote on 06/05/2011 09:01:08 PM: Since this is question that is pervasive in the project, I'd recommend that after this proposal is accepted, that there be a consultation with ASF Legal Affairs on the trademark *before* any project infrastructure is created. Mention that in the proposal. -Rob Done. -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
