Re: [VOTE] : Release Apache Sentry 1.2.0 incubating (rc0)

2013-09-24 Thread Christian Grobmeier

Hi Shreepadma,

I am withdrawing my -1 as this has been resolved.

Please note, I believe this name will ask for trouble, esp with 
getsentry.com. I also believe you should discuss this in your project 
if you really want to take on the risk of this name prior graduation.


Thanks,
Christian

On 24 Sep 2013, at 0:30, Shreepadma Venugopalan wrote:


Hi Christain,

Name search JIRA for Sentry has been resolved. Are you OK with 
changing

your vote?

Cheers,
Shreepadma


On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.comwrote:




Shreepadma Venugopalan schrieb:

On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.comwrote:

Shreepadma Venugopalan schrieb:
Per this document: 
http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/naming.html,

its

required to start the name search process before we release any

packages.

It doesn't mention the name has to be cleared before a release.
OK, maybe it's no phrased well. But surely you understand why the 
name

must be cleared before any package is released?



Well, the way the rule reads today is the search process has to 
start

before a release can happen. If the name has to be cleared before a
release, it needs to be explicitly stated that way.


On the end of the document one can read:

The V.P. Branding will finally approve your request.

Important: you must wait until your trademark has been approved. 
There

is no lazy consensus.

Once the name is approved, you can resolve the JIRA issue and work 
with

your new trademark. Incubator Podlings: please don't forget to update
your Incubator status page.


It says, you can only work with your trademark when VP has approved 
the

mark. For me this includes a release.

You maybe can guess that it can cause trouble when you work with a 
brand

with has not checked. Only recently we had to rename a subproject of
project because the brand was not checked accordingly.

We can either discuss about grammar or spelling issues, which this
document surely has (they are mostly my fault). Or we can simply try 
to

understand what problems it solves and act like that.

For me trademarks clearance are as important as a clean IP. If I were
you, I would keep this vote running, but make the outcome pending to 
the

response.

Now, as Jira is available to me again I can see there a couple of
(software) projects using the name Sentry already. Like for example:
getsentry.com

Given the high number of other which use the name (346 search results 
on
github) I have concerns we will run into a trademark conflict here 
and

insist you wait until trademarks@ has approved your mark.

+ cc Trademarks

Cheers
Christain








We have already started a name search JIRA for Apache Sentry. 
Here's

the

name search JIRA for Apache Sentry:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-38

OK, then lets wait until this has been closed.


The project status page
(http://incubator.apache.org/**projects/sentry.html

http://incubator.apache.org/projects/sentry.html)

has
also been updated to reflect it.

I can't see a note. Maybe its not yet published?


I think the voting can continue on this RC.

I disagree. First clear the name, then release.

Anyway I will propose a change on the process document to make the
intention more clear.

Cheers


Cheers.

Shreepadma



Thanks.
Shreepadma


On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Christian Grobmeier 

grobme...@gmail.comwrote:

-1 (binding).

As per this document:
http://incubator.apache.org/**projects/sentry.html

http://incubator.apache.org/projects/sentry.html

the trademark process has not been resolved.

It is required to clear the name before a product is published:
http://www.apache.org/**foundation/marks/naming.html

http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/naming.html

Thanks!




On 22 Sep 2013, at 7:02, Shreepadma Venugopalan wrote:

This is the first incubator release of Apache Sentry, version

1.2.0-incubating.

It fixes the following issues: http://s.apache.org/VlU

Source files : 
http://people.apache.org/~**shreepadma/sentry-1.2.0/

http://people.apache.org/~shreepadma/sentry-1.2.0/

Tag to be voted on (rc0):
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/**repos/asf/incubator-sentry/**
repo?p=incubator-sentry.git;a=**log;h=refs/tags/release-1.2.0-**rc0



https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-sentry/repo?p=incubator-sentry.git;a=log;h=refs/tags/release-1.2.0-rc0
Sentry's KEYS containing the PGP key we used to sign the 
release:

https://people.apache.org/**keys/group/sentry.asc

https://people.apache.org/keys/group/sentry.asc

Note that this is a source only release and we are voting on the

source

(tag).

A vote on releasing this package has already passed in Apache 
Sentry
PPMC[1] including  +1 votes from our IPMC mentors (Patrick Hunt 
and

Arvind

Prabhakar).

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Shreepadma

[1] -
http://markmail.org/search/?q=**sentry%20vote%20release#query:**



Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache Sentry 1.2.0 incubating (rc0)

2013-09-24 Thread Andrei Savu
+1 (binding)

-- Andrei Savu

On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Shreepadma Venugopalan 
shreepa...@apache.org wrote:

 This is the first incubator release of Apache Sentry, version
 1.2.0-incubating.

 It fixes the following issues: http://s.apache.org/VlU

 Source files : http://people.apache.org/~shreepadma/sentry-1.2.0/

 Tag to be voted on (rc0):

 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-sentry/repo?p=incubator-sentry.git;a=log;h=refs/tags/release-1.2.0-rc0

 Sentry's KEYS containing the PGP key we used to sign the release:
 https://people.apache.org/keys/group/sentry.asc

 Note that this is a source only release and we are voting on the source
 (tag).

 A vote on releasing this package has already passed in Apache Sentry
 PPMC[1] including  +1 votes from our IPMC mentors (Patrick Hunt and Arvind
 Prabhakar).

 Vote will be open for 72 hours.

 [ ] +1 approve
 [ ] +0 no opinion
 [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

 Shreepadma

 [1] -

 http://markmail.org/search/?q=sentry%20vote%20release#query:sentry%20vote%20release+page:1+mid:sqrwevgsxakqatqk+state:results



Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache Sentry 1.2.0 incubating (rc0)

2013-09-24 Thread Shreepadma Venugopalan
Voting is now closed and has passed with the following tally,

Binding +1s: Patrick Hunt, Arvind Prabhakar, Andrei Savu
Non binding +1s: Xuefu Zhang, Jarcec Cecho, Ashish Paliwal.

Thanks to everyone who voted!

Shreepadma



On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 5:11 AM, Andrei Savu as...@apache.org wrote:

 +1 (binding)

 -- Andrei Savu

 On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Shreepadma Venugopalan 
 shreepa...@apache.org wrote:

  This is the first incubator release of Apache Sentry, version
  1.2.0-incubating.
 
  It fixes the following issues: http://s.apache.org/VlU
 
  Source files : http://people.apache.org/~shreepadma/sentry-1.2.0/
 
  Tag to be voted on (rc0):
 
 
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-sentry/repo?p=incubator-sentry.git;a=log;h=refs/tags/release-1.2.0-rc0
 
  Sentry's KEYS containing the PGP key we used to sign the release:
  https://people.apache.org/keys/group/sentry.asc
 
  Note that this is a source only release and we are voting on the source
  (tag).
 
  A vote on releasing this package has already passed in Apache Sentry
  PPMC[1] including  +1 votes from our IPMC mentors (Patrick Hunt and
 Arvind
  Prabhakar).
 
  Vote will be open for 72 hours.
 
  [ ] +1 approve
  [ ] +0 no opinion
  [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
 
  Shreepadma
 
  [1] -
 
 
 http://markmail.org/search/?q=sentry%20vote%20release#query:sentry%20vote%20release+page:1+mid:sqrwevgsxakqatqk+state:results
 



Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache Sentry 1.2.0 incubating (rc0)

2013-09-23 Thread Andrei Savu
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Shreepadma Venugopalan 
shreepa...@apache.org wrote:

 Sentry's KEYS containing the PGP key we used to sign the release:
 https://people.apache.org/keys/group/sentry.asc


Adding sebb's comment regarding KEYS file from the Spark vote thread.
There is a longer thread on general@incubator explaining why this location
is preferred.

-
The KEYS file should normally be under:

http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/sentry/

as this is where the release artifacts will be found if the vote succeeds.

Also that location is automatically archived,

It's important that the KEYS file contains all keys used to sign any
releases, so keys should only be added to it, never removed (except
possibly if the key has been compromised).

So please add your key to the KEYS file at that location (creating it
if necessary).
-

-- Andrei Savu


Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache Sentry 1.2.0 incubating (rc0)

2013-09-23 Thread Andrei Savu
I've been able to build and test the project using the instruction from
README.md. It would be useful to have a basic website or some instructions
on the wiki on how to deploy Sentry.

I see that sentry-binding-hive still use org.apache.access as package name
(HiveAuthzBindingSessionHook.java). Is this intended?

Everything else looks good to me: GPG signature, hashes, DISCLAIMER 
NOTICE files, license headers.

Are there any plans to provide binaries for convenience or to push the jar
files to repository.apache.org / Maven Central?

-- Andrei Savu

On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Shreepadma Venugopalan 
shreepa...@apache.org wrote:

 This vote is being concurrently called on
 dev@sentry.incubator.apache.organd
 general@incubator.apache.org.

 This is the first incubator release of Apache Sentry, version
 1.2.0-incubating.

 It fixes the following issues: goo.gl/Bx5D1x

 Source files : http://people.apache.org/~shreepadma/sentry-1.2.0/

 Tag to be voted on (rc0):

 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-sentry/repo?p=incubator-sentry.git;a=log;h=refs/tags/release-1.2.0-rc0

 Sentry's KEYS containing the PGP key we used to sign the release:
 https://people.apache.org/keys/group/sentry.asc

 Note that this is a source only release and we are voting on the source
 (tag).

 Vote will be open for 72 hours.

 [ ] +1 approve
 [ ] +0 no opinion
 [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

 Thanks.

 Shreepadma



Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache Sentry 1.2.0 incubating (rc0)

2013-09-23 Thread Shreepadma Venugopalan
KEYS have been copied over to
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/sentry/


On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Andrei Savu as...@apache.org wrote:

 On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Shreepadma Venugopalan 
 shreepa...@apache.org wrote:

  Sentry's KEYS containing the PGP key we used to sign the release:
  https://people.apache.org/keys/group/sentry.asc
 

 Adding sebb's comment regarding KEYS file from the Spark vote thread.
 There is a longer thread on general@incubator explaining why this location
 is preferred.

 -
 The KEYS file should normally be under:

 http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/sentry/

 as this is where the release artifacts will be found if the vote succeeds.

 Also that location is automatically archived,

 It's important that the KEYS file contains all keys used to sign any
 releases, so keys should only be added to it, never removed (except
 possibly if the key has been compromised).

 So please add your key to the KEYS file at that location (creating it
 if necessary).
 -

 -- Andrei Savu



Re: [VOTE] : Release Apache Sentry 1.2.0 incubating (rc0)

2013-09-22 Thread Christian Grobmeier

-1 (binding).

As per this document:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/sentry.html
the trademark process has not been resolved.

It is required to clear the name before a product is published:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/naming.html

Thanks!



On 22 Sep 2013, at 7:02, Shreepadma Venugopalan wrote:


This is the first incubator release of Apache Sentry, version
1.2.0-incubating.

It fixes the following issues: http://s.apache.org/VlU

Source files : http://people.apache.org/~shreepadma/sentry-1.2.0/

Tag to be voted on (rc0):
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-sentry/repo?p=incubator-sentry.git;a=log;h=refs/tags/release-1.2.0-rc0

Sentry's KEYS containing the PGP key we used to sign the release:
https://people.apache.org/keys/group/sentry.asc

Note that this is a source only release and we are voting on the 
source

(tag).

A vote on releasing this package has already passed in Apache Sentry
PPMC[1] including  +1 votes from our IPMC mentors (Patrick Hunt and 
Arvind

Prabhakar).

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Shreepadma

[1] -
http://markmail.org/search/?q=sentry%20vote%20release#query:sentry%20vote%20release+page:1+mid:sqrwevgsxakqatqk+state:results


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] : Release Apache Sentry 1.2.0 incubating (rc0)

2013-09-22 Thread Shreepadma Venugopalan
Per this document: http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/naming.html, its
required to start the name search process before we release any packages.
It doesn't mention the name has to be cleared before a release.

We have already started a name search JIRA for Apache Sentry. Here's the
name search JIRA for Apache Sentry:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-38

The project status page
(http://incubator.apache.org/**projects/sentry.htmlhttp://incubator.apache.org/projects/sentry.html)
has
also been updated to reflect it. I think the voting can continue on this RC.

Thanks.
Shreepadma


On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.comwrote:

 -1 (binding).

 As per this document:
 http://incubator.apache.org/**projects/sentry.htmlhttp://incubator.apache.org/projects/sentry.html
 the trademark process has not been resolved.

 It is required to clear the name before a product is published:
 http://www.apache.org/**foundation/marks/naming.htmlhttp://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/naming.html

 Thanks!




 On 22 Sep 2013, at 7:02, Shreepadma Venugopalan wrote:

  This is the first incubator release of Apache Sentry, version
 1.2.0-incubating.

 It fixes the following issues: http://s.apache.org/VlU

 Source files : 
 http://people.apache.org/~**shreepadma/sentry-1.2.0/http://people.apache.org/~shreepadma/sentry-1.2.0/

 Tag to be voted on (rc0):
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/**repos/asf/incubator-sentry/**
 repo?p=incubator-sentry.git;a=**log;h=refs/tags/release-1.2.0-**rc0https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-sentry/repo?p=incubator-sentry.git;a=log;h=refs/tags/release-1.2.0-rc0

 Sentry's KEYS containing the PGP key we used to sign the release:
 https://people.apache.org/**keys/group/sentry.aschttps://people.apache.org/keys/group/sentry.asc

 Note that this is a source only release and we are voting on the source
 (tag).

 A vote on releasing this package has already passed in Apache Sentry
 PPMC[1] including  +1 votes from our IPMC mentors (Patrick Hunt and Arvind
 Prabhakar).

 Vote will be open for 72 hours.

 [ ] +1 approve
 [ ] +0 no opinion
 [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

 Shreepadma

 [1] -
 http://markmail.org/search/?q=**sentry%20vote%20release#query:**
 sentry%20vote%20release+page:**1+mid:sqrwevgsxakqatqk+state:**resultshttp://markmail.org/search/?q=sentry%20vote%20release#query:sentry%20vote%20release+page:1+mid:sqrwevgsxakqatqk+state:results


 --**--**-
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
 general-unsubscribe@incubator.**apache.orggeneral-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: 
 general-help@incubator.apache.**orggeneral-h...@incubator.apache.org




Re: [VOTE] : Release Apache Sentry 1.2.0 incubating (rc0)

2013-09-22 Thread Christian Grobmeier


Shreepadma Venugopalan schrieb:
 Per this document: http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/naming.html, its
 required to start the name search process before we release any packages.
 It doesn't mention the name has to be cleared before a release.

OK, maybe it's no phrased well. But surely you understand why the name must be 
cleared before any package is released?


 We have already started a name search JIRA for Apache Sentry. Here's the
 name search JIRA for Apache Sentry:
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-38

OK, then lets wait until this has been closed.

 The project status page
 (http://incubator.apache.org/**projects/sentry.htmlhttp://incubator.apache.org/projects/sentry.html)
 has
 also been updated to reflect it. 

I can't see a note. Maybe its not yet published?

I think the voting can continue on this RC.

I disagree. First clear the name, then release.

Anyway I will propose a change on the process document to make the intention 
more clear.

Cheers



 Thanks.
 Shreepadma


 On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Christian Grobmeier 
 grobme...@gmail.comwrote:

 -1 (binding).

 As per this document:
 http://incubator.apache.org/**projects/sentry.htmlhttp://incubator.apache.org/projects/sentry.html
 the trademark process has not been resolved.

 It is required to clear the name before a product is published:
 http://www.apache.org/**foundation/marks/naming.htmlhttp://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/naming.html

 Thanks!




 On 22 Sep 2013, at 7:02, Shreepadma Venugopalan wrote:

  This is the first incubator release of Apache Sentry, version
 1.2.0-incubating.

 It fixes the following issues: http://s.apache.org/VlU

 Source files : 
 http://people.apache.org/~**shreepadma/sentry-1.2.0/http://people.apache.org/~shreepadma/sentry-1.2.0/

 Tag to be voted on (rc0):
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/**repos/asf/incubator-sentry/**
 repo?p=incubator-sentry.git;a=**log;h=refs/tags/release-1.2.0-**rc0https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-sentry/repo?p=incubator-sentry.git;a=log;h=refs/tags/release-1.2.0-rc0

 Sentry's KEYS containing the PGP key we used to sign the release:
 https://people.apache.org/**keys/group/sentry.aschttps://people.apache.org/keys/group/sentry.asc

 Note that this is a source only release and we are voting on the source
 (tag).

 A vote on releasing this package has already passed in Apache Sentry
 PPMC[1] including  +1 votes from our IPMC mentors (Patrick Hunt and Arvind
 Prabhakar).

 Vote will be open for 72 hours.

 [ ] +1 approve
 [ ] +0 no opinion
 [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

 Shreepadma

 [1] -
 http://markmail.org/search/?q=**sentry%20vote%20release#query:**
 sentry%20vote%20release+page:**1+mid:sqrwevgsxakqatqk+state:**resultshttp://markmail.org/search/?q=sentry%20vote%20release#query:sentry%20vote%20release+page:1+mid:sqrwevgsxakqatqk+state:results

 --**--**-
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
 general-unsubscribe@incubator.**apache.orggeneral-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: 
 general-help@incubator.apache.**orggeneral-h...@incubator.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [VOTE] : Release Apache Sentry 1.2.0 incubating (rc0)

2013-09-22 Thread Shreepadma Venugopalan
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.comwrote:



 Shreepadma Venugopalan schrieb:
  Per this document: http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/naming.html,
 its
  required to start the name search process before we release any packages.
  It doesn't mention the name has to be cleared before a release.

 OK, maybe it's no phrased well. But surely you understand why the name
 must be cleared before any package is released?


Well, the way the rule reads today is the search process has to start
before a release can happen. If the name has to be cleared before a
release, it needs to be explicitly stated that way.



  We have already started a name search JIRA for Apache Sentry. Here's the
  name search JIRA for Apache Sentry:
  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-38

 OK, then lets wait until this has been closed.

  The project status page
  (http://incubator.apache.org/**projects/sentry.html
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/sentry.html)
  has
  also been updated to reflect it.

 I can't see a note. Maybe its not yet published?

 I think the voting can continue on this RC.

 I disagree. First clear the name, then release.

 Anyway I will propose a change on the process document to make the
 intention more clear.

 Cheers


 Cheers.
Shreepadma


 
  Thanks.
  Shreepadma
 
 
  On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Christian Grobmeier 
 grobme...@gmail.comwrote:
 
  -1 (binding).
 
  As per this document:
  http://incubator.apache.org/**projects/sentry.html
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/sentry.html
  the trademark process has not been resolved.
 
  It is required to clear the name before a product is published:
  http://www.apache.org/**foundation/marks/naming.html
 http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/naming.html
 
  Thanks!
 
 
 
 
  On 22 Sep 2013, at 7:02, Shreepadma Venugopalan wrote:
 
   This is the first incubator release of Apache Sentry, version
  1.2.0-incubating.
 
  It fixes the following issues: http://s.apache.org/VlU
 
  Source files : http://people.apache.org/~**shreepadma/sentry-1.2.0/
 http://people.apache.org/~shreepadma/sentry-1.2.0/
 
  Tag to be voted on (rc0):
  https://git-wip-us.apache.org/**repos/asf/incubator-sentry/**
  repo?p=incubator-sentry.git;a=**log;h=refs/tags/release-1.2.0-**rc0
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-sentry/repo?p=incubator-sentry.git;a=log;h=refs/tags/release-1.2.0-rc0
 
 
  Sentry's KEYS containing the PGP key we used to sign the release:
  https://people.apache.org/**keys/group/sentry.asc
 https://people.apache.org/keys/group/sentry.asc
 
  Note that this is a source only release and we are voting on the source
  (tag).
 
  A vote on releasing this package has already passed in Apache Sentry
  PPMC[1] including  +1 votes from our IPMC mentors (Patrick Hunt and
 Arvind
  Prabhakar).
 
  Vote will be open for 72 hours.
 
  [ ] +1 approve
  [ ] +0 no opinion
  [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
 
  Shreepadma
 
  [1] -
  http://markmail.org/search/?q=**sentry%20vote%20release#query:**
  sentry%20vote%20release+page:**1+mid:sqrwevgsxakqatqk+state:**results
 http://markmail.org/search/?q=sentry%20vote%20release#query:sentry%20vote%20release+page:1+mid:sqrwevgsxakqatqk+state:results
 
 
 
 --**--**-
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.**apache.org
 general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
  For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.**org
 general-h...@incubator.apache.org
 
 
 

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org




Re: [VOTE] : Release Apache Sentry 1.2.0 incubating (rc0)

2013-09-22 Thread Christian Grobmeier


Shreepadma Venugopalan schrieb:
 On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Christian Grobmeier
 grobme...@gmail.comwrote:
 Shreepadma Venugopalan schrieb:
 Per this document: http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/naming.html,
 its
 required to start the name search process before we release any packages.
 It doesn't mention the name has to be cleared before a release.
 OK, maybe it's no phrased well. But surely you understand why the name
 must be cleared before any package is released?

 
 Well, the way the rule reads today is the search process has to start
 before a release can happen. If the name has to be cleared before a
 release, it needs to be explicitly stated that way.

On the end of the document one can read:

The V.P. Branding will finally approve your request.

Important: you must wait until your trademark has been approved. There
is no lazy consensus.

Once the name is approved, you can resolve the JIRA issue and work with
your new trademark. Incubator Podlings: please don't forget to update
your Incubator status page.


It says, you can only work with your trademark when VP has approved the
mark. For me this includes a release.

You maybe can guess that it can cause trouble when you work with a brand
with has not checked. Only recently we had to rename a subproject of
project because the brand was not checked accordingly.

We can either discuss about grammar or spelling issues, which this
document surely has (they are mostly my fault). Or we can simply try to
understand what problems it solves and act like that.

For me trademarks clearance are as important as a clean IP. If I were
you, I would keep this vote running, but make the outcome pending to the
response.

Now, as Jira is available to me again I can see there a couple of
(software) projects using the name Sentry already. Like for example:
getsentry.com

Given the high number of other which use the name (346 search results on
github) I have concerns we will run into a trademark conflict here and
insist you wait until trademarks@ has approved your mark.

+ cc Trademarks

Cheers
Christain






 
 We have already started a name search JIRA for Apache Sentry. Here's the
 name search JIRA for Apache Sentry:
 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-38
 OK, then lets wait until this has been closed.

 The project status page
 (http://incubator.apache.org/**projects/sentry.html
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/sentry.html)
 has
 also been updated to reflect it.
 I can't see a note. Maybe its not yet published?

 I think the voting can continue on this RC.
 I disagree. First clear the name, then release.

 Anyway I will propose a change on the process document to make the
 intention more clear.

 Cheers


 Cheers.
 Shreepadma
 
 
 Thanks.
 Shreepadma


 On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Christian Grobmeier 
 grobme...@gmail.comwrote:
 -1 (binding).

 As per this document:
 http://incubator.apache.org/**projects/sentry.html
 http://incubator.apache.org/projects/sentry.html
 the trademark process has not been resolved.

 It is required to clear the name before a product is published:
 http://www.apache.org/**foundation/marks/naming.html
 http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/naming.html
 Thanks!




 On 22 Sep 2013, at 7:02, Shreepadma Venugopalan wrote:

  This is the first incubator release of Apache Sentry, version
 1.2.0-incubating.

 It fixes the following issues: http://s.apache.org/VlU

 Source files : http://people.apache.org/~**shreepadma/sentry-1.2.0/
 http://people.apache.org/~shreepadma/sentry-1.2.0/
 Tag to be voted on (rc0):
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/**repos/asf/incubator-sentry/**
 repo?p=incubator-sentry.git;a=**log;h=refs/tags/release-1.2.0-**rc0
 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-sentry/repo?p=incubator-sentry.git;a=log;h=refs/tags/release-1.2.0-rc0
 Sentry's KEYS containing the PGP key we used to sign the release:
 https://people.apache.org/**keys/group/sentry.asc
 https://people.apache.org/keys/group/sentry.asc
 Note that this is a source only release and we are voting on the source
 (tag).

 A vote on releasing this package has already passed in Apache Sentry
 PPMC[1] including  +1 votes from our IPMC mentors (Patrick Hunt and
 Arvind
 Prabhakar).

 Vote will be open for 72 hours.

 [ ] +1 approve
 [ ] +0 no opinion
 [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

 Shreepadma

 [1] -
 http://markmail.org/search/?q=**sentry%20vote%20release#query:**
 sentry%20vote%20release+page:**1+mid:sqrwevgsxakqatqk+state:**results
 http://markmail.org/search/?q=sentry%20vote%20release#query:sentry%20vote%20release+page:1+mid:sqrwevgsxakqatqk+state:results
 --**--**-
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.**apache.org
 general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.**org
 general-h...@incubator.apache.org

 -
 

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache Sentry 1.2.0 incubating (rc0)

2013-09-20 Thread Xuefu Zhang
+1


On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Shreepadma Venugopalan 
shreepa...@apache.org wrote:

 This vote is being concurrently called on
 dev@sentry.incubator.apache.organd
 general@incubator.apache.org.

 This is the first incubator release of Apache Sentry, version
 1.2.0-incubating.

 It fixes the following issues: goo.gl/Bx5D1x

 Source files : http://people.apache.org/~shreepadma/sentry-1.2.0/

 Tag to be voted on (rc0):

 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-sentry/repo?p=incubator-sentry.git;a=log;h=refs/tags/release-1.2.0-rc0

 Sentry's KEYS containing the PGP key we used to sign the release:
 https://people.apache.org/keys/group/sentry.asc

 Note that this is a source only release and we are voting on the source
 (tag).

 Vote will be open for 72 hours.

 [ ] +1 approve
 [ ] +0 no opinion
 [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

 Thanks.

 Shreepadma