Re: [VOTE] Approve release CXF 2.0.4-incubator

2008-01-30 Thread sebb
The CXF build fails several tests.

Environment:
Maven version: 2.0.8
Java version: 1.5.0_13
OS name: "windows xp" version: "5.1" arch: "x86" Family: "windows"

Log file:

http://people.apache.org/~sebb/CXF


On 30/01/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are several problems with the NOTICE and LICENSE files.
>
> The NOTICE file should only pertain to artefacts actually included in
> distribution; it should not have any details of transitive
> dependencies. So the "/uses" text should be removed.
>
> The line
>
> This product includes/uses software(s) developed by 'an unknown organization'
>
> is rather unhelpful; there are 3 organisations involved and the NOTICE
> should mention these separately and by their proper names.
>
> There are also multiple additional mentions of 'Apache Software
> Foundation'; some of these give http://jakarta.apache.org/ as the ASF
> web address, which is clearly wrong. None of the additional mentions
> should be present - they just make the file difficult to read.
>
> The LICENSE file needs to contain copies of all the 3rd party
> licenses, or at least pointers to them, see:
>
> http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#new
>
> It should list the exact jars to which the 3rd party licenses apply, e.g.
>
> jdom-1.0.jar - see licenses/jdom.txt
>
> Having the version number is important as the license may change for
> different versions.
>
>
> On 30/01/2008, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The policy page says:
> >
> > "Therefore, should a Podling decide it wishes to perform a release, the
> > Podling SHALL hold a vote on the Podling's public -dev list. At least three
> > +1 votes are required (see the Apache Voting Process page), and only the
> > PPMC member votes are binding. If the majority of all votes is positive,
> > then the Podling SHALL send a summary of that vote to the Incubator's
> > general list and formally request the Incubator PMC approve such a release.
> > Three +1 Incubator PMC votes are required." -
> > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
> >
> > Its a separate approval vote so wouldn't that require an explicit vote? Is
> > it so hard to vote over here as well?
>
> +1
>
> >...ant
> >
> > On Jan 29, 2008 6:10 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > As long as the vote was for the *same artifact*, I don't see what
> > > difference it makes *where* the vote was posted.
> > >
> > > Craig
> > >
> > > On Jan 28, 2008, at 11:20 PM, ant elder wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm not sure those votes on cxf-dev count in this vote unless they
> > > > vote in
> > > > this thread, no mater though as there are enough votes here now.
> > > >
> > > >   ...ant
> > > >
> > > > On Jan 26, 2008 5:56 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Just a quick update while the vote is open.
> > > >>
> > > >> Jim Jagielski and Jeff Genender both voted +1 on the thread on cxf-
> > > >> dev.
> > > >> Thus, that's two additional binding IPMC votes.   Vote is still
> > > >> open :-)
> > > >>
> > > >> Dan
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Friday 25 January 2008, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > > >>> We held a vote on cxf-dev to release a new version of CXF. This
> > > >>> version is pretty much just a big "bug fix rollup" compared to 2.0.3
> > > >>> fixing over 50 JIRA issues reported by users and bugs encountered
> > > >>> during some interop testing.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> For a full list of the issues, see:
> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=1231285
> > > >>> 5&styleName=Html&projectId=12310511&Create=Create
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The vote thread is at:
> > > >>> http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-CXF-2.0.4-incubator-to15025947.ht
> > > >>> ml
> > > >>>
> > > >>> In summary, we have 11 +1 votes,  no 0 or -1 votes.  Two of the
> > > >>> votes
> > > >>> are from ASF members (bsnyder and gnodet).   I'm not sure if they
> > > >>> are
> > > >>> binding yet or not.  (I think they both sent in requests to join the
> > > >>> IPMC, just not sure if that is finished yet).
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The staging area is at:
> > > >>> http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0.4-incubator
> > >  > > >>> >
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The distributions are in the "dist" directory. The "m2repo"
> > > >>> directory
> > > >>> contains the stuff that will by pushed to the
> > > >>> m2-incubating-repository.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> This release is tagged at:
> > > >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0.4-incubator
> > > >>> /
> > > >>>
> > > >>> We and our users appreciate you taking the time to look over this
> > > >>> release!
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> J. Daniel Kulp
> > > >> Principal Engineer, IONA
> > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
> > > >>
> > > >> --

Re: [VOTE] Approve release CXF 2.0.4-incubator

2008-01-30 Thread sebb
There are several problems with the NOTICE and LICENSE files.

The NOTICE file should only pertain to artefacts actually included in
distribution; it should not have any details of transitive
dependencies. So the "/uses" text should be removed.

The line

This product includes/uses software(s) developed by 'an unknown organization'

is rather unhelpful; there are 3 organisations involved and the NOTICE
should mention these separately and by their proper names.

There are also multiple additional mentions of 'Apache Software
Foundation'; some of these give http://jakarta.apache.org/ as the ASF
web address, which is clearly wrong. None of the additional mentions
should be present - they just make the file difficult to read.

The LICENSE file needs to contain copies of all the 3rd party
licenses, or at least pointers to them, see:

http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#new

It should list the exact jars to which the 3rd party licenses apply, e.g.

jdom-1.0.jar - see licenses/jdom.txt

Having the version number is important as the license may change for
different versions.


On 30/01/2008, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The policy page says:
>
> "Therefore, should a Podling decide it wishes to perform a release, the
> Podling SHALL hold a vote on the Podling's public -dev list. At least three
> +1 votes are required (see the Apache Voting Process page), and only the
> PPMC member votes are binding. If the majority of all votes is positive,
> then the Podling SHALL send a summary of that vote to the Incubator's
> general list and formally request the Incubator PMC approve such a release.
> Three +1 Incubator PMC votes are required." -
> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
>
> Its a separate approval vote so wouldn't that require an explicit vote? Is
> it so hard to vote over here as well?

+1

>...ant
>
> On Jan 29, 2008 6:10 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > As long as the vote was for the *same artifact*, I don't see what
> > difference it makes *where* the vote was posted.
> >
> > Craig
> >
> > On Jan 28, 2008, at 11:20 PM, ant elder wrote:
> >
> > > I'm not sure those votes on cxf-dev count in this vote unless they
> > > vote in
> > > this thread, no mater though as there are enough votes here now.
> > >
> > >   ...ant
> > >
> > > On Jan 26, 2008 5:56 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Just a quick update while the vote is open.
> > >>
> > >> Jim Jagielski and Jeff Genender both voted +1 on the thread on cxf-
> > >> dev.
> > >> Thus, that's two additional binding IPMC votes.   Vote is still
> > >> open :-)
> > >>
> > >> Dan
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Friday 25 January 2008, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > >>> We held a vote on cxf-dev to release a new version of CXF. This
> > >>> version is pretty much just a big "bug fix rollup" compared to 2.0.3
> > >>> fixing over 50 JIRA issues reported by users and bugs encountered
> > >>> during some interop testing.
> > >>>
> > >>> For a full list of the issues, see:
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=1231285
> > >>> 5&styleName=Html&projectId=12310511&Create=Create
> > >>>
> > >>> The vote thread is at:
> > >>> http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-CXF-2.0.4-incubator-to15025947.ht
> > >>> ml
> > >>>
> > >>> In summary, we have 11 +1 votes,  no 0 or -1 votes.  Two of the
> > >>> votes
> > >>> are from ASF members (bsnyder and gnodet).   I'm not sure if they
> > >>> are
> > >>> binding yet or not.  (I think they both sent in requests to join the
> > >>> IPMC, just not sure if that is finished yet).
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> The staging area is at:
> > >>> http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0.4-incubator
> >  > >>> >
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> The distributions are in the "dist" directory. The "m2repo"
> > >>> directory
> > >>> contains the stuff that will by pushed to the
> > >>> m2-incubating-repository.
> > >>>
> > >>> This release is tagged at:
> > >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0.4-incubator
> > >>> /
> > >>>
> > >>> We and our users appreciate you taking the time to look over this
> > >>> release!
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> J. Daniel Kulp
> > >> Principal Engineer, IONA
> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
> > >>
> > >> -
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> > Craig Russell
> > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> > 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
> >
> >
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL P

Re: [VOTE] Approve release CXF 2.0.4-incubator

2008-01-30 Thread ant elder
The policy page says:

"Therefore, should a Podling decide it wishes to perform a release, the
Podling SHALL hold a vote on the Podling's public -dev list. At least three
+1 votes are required (see the Apache Voting Process page), and only the
PPMC member votes are binding. If the majority of all votes is positive,
then the Podling SHALL send a summary of that vote to the Incubator's
general list and formally request the Incubator PMC approve such a release.
Three +1 Incubator PMC votes are required." -
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases

Its a separate approval vote so wouldn't that require an explicit vote? Is
it so hard to vote over here as well?

   ...ant

On Jan 29, 2008 6:10 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> As long as the vote was for the *same artifact*, I don't see what
> difference it makes *where* the vote was posted.
>
> Craig
>
> On Jan 28, 2008, at 11:20 PM, ant elder wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure those votes on cxf-dev count in this vote unless they
> > vote in
> > this thread, no mater though as there are enough votes here now.
> >
> >   ...ant
> >
> > On Jan 26, 2008 5:56 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Just a quick update while the vote is open.
> >>
> >> Jim Jagielski and Jeff Genender both voted +1 on the thread on cxf-
> >> dev.
> >> Thus, that's two additional binding IPMC votes.   Vote is still
> >> open :-)
> >>
> >> Dan
> >>
> >>
> >> On Friday 25 January 2008, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> >>> We held a vote on cxf-dev to release a new version of CXF. This
> >>> version is pretty much just a big "bug fix rollup" compared to 2.0.3
> >>> fixing over 50 JIRA issues reported by users and bugs encountered
> >>> during some interop testing.
> >>>
> >>> For a full list of the issues, see:
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=1231285
> >>> 5&styleName=Html&projectId=12310511&Create=Create
> >>>
> >>> The vote thread is at:
> >>> http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-CXF-2.0.4-incubator-to15025947.ht
> >>> ml
> >>>
> >>> In summary, we have 11 +1 votes,  no 0 or -1 votes.  Two of the
> >>> votes
> >>> are from ASF members (bsnyder and gnodet).   I'm not sure if they
> >>> are
> >>> binding yet or not.  (I think they both sent in requests to join the
> >>> IPMC, just not sure if that is finished yet).
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The staging area is at:
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0.4-incubator
>  >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The distributions are in the "dist" directory. The "m2repo"
> >>> directory
> >>> contains the stuff that will by pushed to the
> >>> m2-incubating-repository.
> >>>
> >>> This release is tagged at:
> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0.4-incubator
> >>> /
> >>>
> >>> We and our users appreciate you taking the time to look over this
> >>> release!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> J. Daniel Kulp
> >> Principal Engineer, IONA
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
>
> Craig Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>


Re: [VOTE] Approve release CXF 2.0.4-incubator

2008-01-29 Thread Craig L Russell
As long as the vote was for the *same artifact*, I don't see what  
difference it makes *where* the vote was posted.


Craig

On Jan 28, 2008, at 11:20 PM, ant elder wrote:

I'm not sure those votes on cxf-dev count in this vote unless they  
vote in

this thread, no mater though as there are enough votes here now.

  ...ant

On Jan 26, 2008 5:56 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:




Just a quick update while the vote is open.

Jim Jagielski and Jeff Genender both voted +1 on the thread on cxf- 
dev.

Thus, that's two additional binding IPMC votes.   Vote is still
open :-)

Dan


On Friday 25 January 2008, Daniel Kulp wrote:

We held a vote on cxf-dev to release a new version of CXF. This
version is pretty much just a big "bug fix rollup" compared to 2.0.3
fixing over 50 JIRA issues reported by users and bugs encountered
during some interop testing.

For a full list of the issues, see:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=1231285
5&styleName=Html&projectId=12310511&Create=Create

The vote thread is at:
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-CXF-2.0.4-incubator-to15025947.ht
ml

In summary, we have 11 +1 votes,  no 0 or -1 votes.  Two of the  
votes
are from ASF members (bsnyder and gnodet).   I'm not sure if they  
are

binding yet or not.  (I think they both sent in requests to join the
IPMC, just not sure if that is finished yet).


The staging area is at:
http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0.4-incubator



The distributions are in the "dist" directory. The "m2repo"  
directory

contains the stuff that will by pushed to the
m2-incubating-repository.

This release is tagged at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0.4-incubator
/

We and our users appreciate you taking the time to look over this
release!




--
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer, IONA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: [VOTE] Approve release CXF 2.0.4-incubator

2008-01-29 Thread Bill Stoddard

+1

Bill
Daniel Kulp wrote:
We held a vote on cxf-dev to release a new version of CXF. This version 
is pretty much just a big "bug fix rollup" compared to 2.0.3 fixing over 
50 JIRA issues reported by users and bugs encountered during some 
interop testing.


For a full list of the issues, see:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12312855&styleName=Html&projectId=12310511&Create=Create

The vote thread is at: 
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-CXF-2.0.4-incubator-to15025947.html


In summary, we have 11 +1 votes,  no 0 or -1 votes.  Two of the votes are 
from ASF members (bsnyder and gnodet).   I'm not sure if they are 
binding yet or not.  (I think they both sent in requests to join the 
IPMC, just not sure if that is finished yet).



The staging area is at:
http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0.4-incubator


The distributions are in the "dist" directory. The "m2repo" directory 
contains the stuff that will by pushed to the m2-incubating-repository.


This release is tagged at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0.4-incubator/

We and our users appreciate you taking the time to look over this 
release! 

  



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Approve release CXF 2.0.4-incubator

2008-01-28 Thread ant elder
I'm not sure those votes on cxf-dev count in this vote unless they vote in
this thread, no mater though as there are enough votes here now.

   ...ant

On Jan 26, 2008 5:56 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>
> Just a quick update while the vote is open.
>
> Jim Jagielski and Jeff Genender both voted +1 on the thread on cxf-dev.
> Thus, that's two additional binding IPMC votes.   Vote is still
> open :-)
>
> Dan
>
>
> On Friday 25 January 2008, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > We held a vote on cxf-dev to release a new version of CXF. This
> > version is pretty much just a big "bug fix rollup" compared to 2.0.3
> > fixing over 50 JIRA issues reported by users and bugs encountered
> > during some interop testing.
> >
> > For a full list of the issues, see:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=1231285
> >5&styleName=Html&projectId=12310511&Create=Create
> >
> > The vote thread is at:
> > http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-CXF-2.0.4-incubator-to15025947.ht
> >ml
> >
> > In summary, we have 11 +1 votes,  no 0 or -1 votes.  Two of the votes
> > are from ASF members (bsnyder and gnodet).   I'm not sure if they are
> > binding yet or not.  (I think they both sent in requests to join the
> > IPMC, just not sure if that is finished yet).
> >
> >
> > The staging area is at:
> > http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0.4-incubator
> >
> >
> > The distributions are in the "dist" directory. The "m2repo" directory
> > contains the stuff that will by pushed to the
> > m2-incubating-repository.
> >
> > This release is tagged at:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0.4-incubator
> >/
> >
> > We and our users appreciate you taking the time to look over this
> > release!
>
>
>
> --
> J. Daniel Kulp
> Principal Engineer, IONA
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


Re: [VOTE] Approve release CXF 2.0.4-incubator

2008-01-28 Thread ant elder
Looks ok to me, +1.

   ...ant

On Jan 25, 2008 9:42 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>
> We held a vote on cxf-dev to release a new version of CXF. This version
> is pretty much just a big "bug fix rollup" compared to 2.0.3 fixing over
> 50 JIRA issues reported by users and bugs encountered during some
> interop testing.
>
> For a full list of the issues, see:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12312855&styleName=Html&projectId=12310511&Create=Create
>
> The vote thread is at:
> http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-CXF-2.0.4-incubator-to15025947.html
>
> In summary, we have 11 +1 votes,  no 0 or -1 votes.  Two of the votes are
> from ASF members (bsnyder and gnodet).   I'm not sure if they are
> binding yet or not.  (I think they both sent in requests to join the
> IPMC, just not sure if that is finished yet).
>
>
> The staging area is at:
> http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0.4-incubator
>
>
> The distributions are in the "dist" directory. The "m2repo" directory
> contains the stuff that will by pushed to the m2-incubating-repository.
>
> This release is tagged at:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0.4-incubator/
>
> We and our users appreciate you taking the time to look over this
> release!
>
> --
> J. Daniel Kulp
> Principal Engineer, IONA
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


Re: [VOTE] Approve release CXF 2.0.4-incubator

2008-01-27 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Saturday 26 January 2008 05:42, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> We held a vote on cxf-dev to release a new version of CXF. This version
> is pretty much just a big "bug fix rollup" compared to 2.0.3 fixing over
> 50 JIRA issues reported by users and bugs encountered during some
> interop testing.

+1

Cheers
-- 
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer

I  live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er
I  work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc
I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Approve release CXF 2.0.4-incubator

2008-01-26 Thread Davanum Srinivas

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

+1 from me!

- -- dims

Daniel Kulp wrote:
|
| Just a quick update while the vote is open.
|
| Jim Jagielski and Jeff Genender both voted +1 on the thread on cxf-dev.
| Thus, that's two additional binding IPMC votes.   Vote is still
| open :-)
|
| Dan
|
|
| On Friday 25 January 2008, Daniel Kulp wrote:
|> We held a vote on cxf-dev to release a new version of CXF. This
|> version is pretty much just a big "bug fix rollup" compared to 2.0.3
|> fixing over 50 JIRA issues reported by users and bugs encountered
|> during some interop testing.
|>
|> For a full list of the issues, see:
|> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=1231285
|> 5&styleName=Html&projectId=12310511&Create=Create
|>
|> The vote thread is at:
|> http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-CXF-2.0.4-incubator-to15025947.ht
|> ml
|>
|> In summary, we have 11 +1 votes,  no 0 or -1 votes.  Two of the votes
|> are from ASF members (bsnyder and gnodet).   I'm not sure if they are
|> binding yet or not.  (I think they both sent in requests to join the
|> IPMC, just not sure if that is finished yet).
|>
|>
|> The staging area is at:
|> http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0.4-incubator
|>
|>
|> The distributions are in the "dist" directory. The "m2repo" directory
|> contains the stuff that will by pushed to the
|> m2-incubating-repository.
|>
|> This release is tagged at:
|> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0.4-incubator
|> /
|>
|> We and our users appreciate you taking the time to look over this
|> release!
|
|
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)

iD8DBQFHm39RgNg6eWEDv1kRAooiAJ9xqaHJRmxG+Eu1OOvbcSsSq9rSLQCgoA+x
ljhlaLLXXX0mqiCDMeOo2I8=
=ibh8
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] Approve release CXF 2.0.4-incubator

2008-01-26 Thread Daniel Kulp


Just a quick update while the vote is open.

Jim Jagielski and Jeff Genender both voted +1 on the thread on cxf-dev.   
Thus, that's two additional binding IPMC votes.   Vote is still 
open :-)

Dan


On Friday 25 January 2008, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> We held a vote on cxf-dev to release a new version of CXF. This
> version is pretty much just a big "bug fix rollup" compared to 2.0.3
> fixing over 50 JIRA issues reported by users and bugs encountered
> during some interop testing.
>
> For a full list of the issues, see:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=1231285
>5&styleName=Html&projectId=12310511&Create=Create
>
> The vote thread is at:
> http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-CXF-2.0.4-incubator-to15025947.ht
>ml
>
> In summary, we have 11 +1 votes,  no 0 or -1 votes.  Two of the votes
> are from ASF members (bsnyder and gnodet).   I'm not sure if they are
> binding yet or not.  (I think they both sent in requests to join the
> IPMC, just not sure if that is finished yet).
>
>
> The staging area is at:
> http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0.4-incubator
>
>
> The distributions are in the "dist" directory. The "m2repo" directory
> contains the stuff that will by pushed to the
> m2-incubating-repository.
>
> This release is tagged at:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0.4-incubator
>/
>
> We and our users appreciate you taking the time to look over this
> release!



-- 
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer, IONA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]