Re: [VOTE] Release Apache VXQuery Incubating 0.2 (RC4)

[Vinayak Borkar]

Marvin,


Thanks a ton for this vote. Now we have 3 +1s from IPMC members as 
summarized below:


+1 (binding)

Jochen Wiedmann
Ant Elder
Marvin Humphrey

-1

none


Vinayak



On 11/9/13, 9:08 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Till  wrote:


[ ] +1 release this package as apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating
[ ] -1 do not release this package because ...


`LICENSE` looks good.  Appropriate pointer to ODC-BY.

`NOTICE` looks good.  Copyright up to date.  Appropriate ASF citation.
Copyright for Black Titan software looks appropriate (though of course I did
not witness the commit which moved it there).

RAT report is clean.  (Thanks for providing it!)

The only archive file is `dblp.xml.gz`.  Though this is a binary file, it's
just compressed XML so it's still essentially "source".  No objection from me
with regards to the ODC-BY 1.0 licensing -- see LEGAL-182.

The `KEYS` file should be removed from the source tree.  Not a blocker.

`DISCLAIMER` is present.  It notes that the sponsor is the XMLBeans PMC, which
is interesting because XMLBeans is headed to the Attic[1].  Not something that
has to be resolved for the release, though IMO.

Except for the file `DEPENDENCIES`, the archive contents matches the release
tag[2].

All dependencies have compatible licensing.

Sums and sigs look good[3].

+1 (binding)

Cheers,

Marvin Humphrey

[1] 
http://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2013/board_minutes_2013_07_17.txt

[2] marvin@knut:~/Desktop/vxquery $ diff -ur
apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating export_from_svn_tag/
 Only in apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating: DEPENDENCIES
 marvin@knut:~/Desktop/vxquery $

[3] marvin@knut:~/Desktop/vxquery $ gpg --verify
apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.asc
 gpg: Signature made Thu Oct  3 10:19:23 2013 PDT using RSA key ID BAED10BC
 gpg: Good signature from "Till Westmann (CODE SIGNING KEY)
"
 gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
 gpg:  There is no indication that the signature belongs to
the owner.
 Primary key fingerprint: 9BDA F9FB A128 CAD5 0B90  33FF 2501 E46B BAED 10BC
 marvin@knut:~/Desktop/vxquery $ shasum
apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip
 f07fe151ddea24457c6497a1abd48528f9c02462
apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip
 marvin@knut:~/Desktop/vxquery $ cat
apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.sha1
 f07fe151ddea24457c6497a1abd48528f9c02462marvin@knut:~/Desktop/vxquery $ md5
 marvin@knut:~/Desktop/vxquery $ md5
apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip
 MD5 (apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip) =
381c212e2573b467855aa682a5e3ab22
 marvin@knut:~/Desktop/vxquery $ cat
apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.md5
 381c212e2573b467855aa682a5e3ab22marvin@knut:~/Desktop/vxquery $

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache VXQuery Incubating 0.2 (RC4)

[Marvin Humphrey]

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Till  wrote:

> [ ] +1 release this package as apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating
> [ ] -1 do not release this package because ...

`LICENSE` looks good.  Appropriate pointer to ODC-BY.

`NOTICE` looks good.  Copyright up to date.  Appropriate ASF citation.
Copyright for Black Titan software looks appropriate (though of course I did
not witness the commit which moved it there).

RAT report is clean.  (Thanks for providing it!)

The only archive file is `dblp.xml.gz`.  Though this is a binary file, it's
just compressed XML so it's still essentially "source".  No objection from me
with regards to the ODC-BY 1.0 licensing -- see LEGAL-182.

The `KEYS` file should be removed from the source tree.  Not a blocker.

`DISCLAIMER` is present.  It notes that the sponsor is the XMLBeans PMC, which
is interesting because XMLBeans is headed to the Attic[1].  Not something that
has to be resolved for the release, though IMO.

Except for the file `DEPENDENCIES`, the archive contents matches the release
tag[2].

All dependencies have compatible licensing.

Sums and sigs look good[3].

+1 (binding)

Cheers,

Marvin Humphrey

[1] 
http://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2013/board_minutes_2013_07_17.txt

[2] marvin@knut:~/Desktop/vxquery $ diff -ur
apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating export_from_svn_tag/
Only in apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating: DEPENDENCIES
marvin@knut:~/Desktop/vxquery $

[3] marvin@knut:~/Desktop/vxquery $ gpg --verify
apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.asc
gpg: Signature made Thu Oct  3 10:19:23 2013 PDT using RSA key ID BAED10BC
gpg: Good signature from "Till Westmann (CODE SIGNING KEY)
"
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg:  There is no indication that the signature belongs to
the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 9BDA F9FB A128 CAD5 0B90  33FF 2501 E46B BAED 10BC
marvin@knut:~/Desktop/vxquery $ shasum
apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip
f07fe151ddea24457c6497a1abd48528f9c02462
apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip
marvin@knut:~/Desktop/vxquery $ cat
apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.sha1
f07fe151ddea24457c6497a1abd48528f9c02462marvin@knut:~/Desktop/vxquery $ md5
marvin@knut:~/Desktop/vxquery $ md5
apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip
MD5 (apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip) =
381c212e2573b467855aa682a5e3ab22
marvin@knut:~/Desktop/vxquery $ cat
apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.md5
381c212e2573b467855aa682a5e3ab22marvin@knut:~/Desktop/vxquery $

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache VXQuery Incubating 0.2 (RC4)

[Dave Fisher]

On Oct 30, 2013, at 10:29 PM, Till Westmann wrote:

> Hi Dave,
> 
> On Oct 11, 2013, at 6:08 AM, Dave Fisher  wrote:
> 
>> On Oct 11, 2013, at 2:03 AM, ant elder wrote:
>> 
>>> Vinayak, the release does not need to be redone yet. If it really looks
>>> like this will hold up getting another vote raise a ASF legal JIRA  (
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL) asking to confirm that ODC-BY
>>> is ok.
>> 
>> It holds me up.
> 
> Even though https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-182 is not yet 
> closed, both Craig and Chris agreed on the JIRA that it would be acceptable 
> to include the database in its current use in an incubating release of Apache 
> VXQuery. 
> If this is acceptable for you as well and if you would vote +1 on this RC, we 
> would be able to finally get the first release out. 

No, I am looking for resolution, Craig and Chris are also able to VOTE here at 
the IPMC - the release is not large and would not take them long.

> If you think it is not acceptable in its current state, would you be 
> comfortable voting on a new RC that does not contain the file?

Yes, I would, definitely. I should be able to find the time within a 72 hour 
window of a VOTE start.

Regards,
Dave

> 
> Thanks,
> Till
> 
>>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Vinayak Borkar  wrote:
>>> 
 Hi Dave,
 
 
 
 Before I can VOTE I have questions.
> 
> (1) What is the following file?
> 
> A apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/**vxquery-core/src/test/**
> resources/documents/dblp.xml.**gz
> 
> Am I correct that this shows up in your LICENSE as:
> 
>  ==**==**
> ===
> 
>  The DBLP (http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/) database in
> 
>  vxquery-core/src/test/**resources/documents/dblp.xml.**gz
> 
>  can be used under the terms and conditions of the Open Data Commons
>  Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0). The full ODC-BY 1.0 license text
>  is avaialable at
> 
>  
> http://opendatacommons.org/**licenses/by/1.0/
> 
> I don't see this license on 
> http://www.apache.org/legal/**3party.html
> 
> Can you show me a reference from the Legal Discuss list:
> http://www.apache.org/**foundation/mailinglists.html#**foundation-legalthat
>  puts this in Class A? I think that this is required otherwise the
> project will need to find a better way of packaging this source 
> dependency.
> 
 
 
 The file is a standard XML file that is used for unit testing the parsing
 capabilities of the software. It is not critical to the release itself.
 
 Just to confirm, if there is no such mention on the mailing lists, do we
 have to create a new release without this dependency?
 
 Thanks,
 Vinayak
 
 
 
 
 
 
> (2) Does the podling intend in this VOTE to authorize the release of the
> convenience binary artifacts that are also in the directory? I see from
> discussions on the project that this is NOT intended. At least that is how
> I view this email. [2]
> 
> [2] http://mail-archives.apache.**org/mod_mbox/incubator-**
> vxquery-dev/201310.mbox/%**3C1591541861.240305.**
> 1381162348269.open-xchange%**40email.1und1.de%3E
> 
> Regards,
> Dave
> 
> On Oct 7, 2013, at 8:59 AM, Till wrote:
> 
> Please verify and vote on the fourth release candidate for our first
>> release apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating.
>> 
>> The tag to be voted on is
>> 
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/incubator/vxquery/tags/**
>> apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/
>> 
>> at revision 1528941.
>> 
>> The artifacts, signatures, md5, and sha1 are at:
>> https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/**
>> orgapachevxquery-128/org/**apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/**
>> 0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-**0.2-incubating-source-release.**zip
>> https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/**
>> orgapachevxquery-128/org/**apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/**
>> 0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-**0.2-incubating-source-release.**zip.asc
>> https://repository.apache.org/**cont

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache VXQuery Incubating 0.2 (RC4)

[Till Westmann]

Hi Dave,

On Oct 11, 2013, at 6:08 AM, Dave Fisher  wrote:

> On Oct 11, 2013, at 2:03 AM, ant elder wrote:
> 
>> Vinayak, the release does not need to be redone yet. If it really looks
>> like this will hold up getting another vote raise a ASF legal JIRA  (
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL) asking to confirm that ODC-BY
>> is ok.
> 
> It holds me up.

Even though https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-182 is not yet closed, 
both Craig and Chris agreed on the JIRA that it would be acceptable to include 
the database in its current use in an incubating release of Apache VXQuery. 
If this is acceptable for you as well and if you would vote +1 on this RC, we 
would be able to finally get the first release out. 
If you think it is not acceptable in its current state, would you be 
comfortable voting on a new RC that does not contain the file?

Thanks,
Till

>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Vinayak Borkar  wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Dave,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Before I can VOTE I have questions.
 
 (1) What is the following file?
 
  A apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/**vxquery-core/src/test/**
 resources/documents/dblp.xml.**gz
 
 Am I correct that this shows up in your LICENSE as:
 
   ==**==**
 ===
 
   The DBLP (http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/) database in
 
   vxquery-core/src/test/**resources/documents/dblp.xml.**gz
 
   can be used under the terms and conditions of the Open Data Commons
   Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0). The full ODC-BY 1.0 license text
   is avaialable at
 
   
 http://opendatacommons.org/**licenses/by/1.0/
 
 I don't see this license on 
 http://www.apache.org/legal/**3party.html
 
 Can you show me a reference from the Legal Discuss list:
 http://www.apache.org/**foundation/mailinglists.html#**foundation-legalthat
  puts this in Class A? I think that this is required otherwise the
 project will need to find a better way of packaging this source dependency.
 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The file is a standard XML file that is used for unit testing the parsing
>>> capabilities of the software. It is not critical to the release itself.
>>> 
>>> Just to confirm, if there is no such mention on the mailing lists, do we
>>> have to create a new release without this dependency?
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Vinayak
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
 (2) Does the podling intend in this VOTE to authorize the release of the
 convenience binary artifacts that are also in the directory? I see from
 discussions on the project that this is NOT intended. At least that is how
 I view this email. [2]
 
 [2] http://mail-archives.apache.**org/mod_mbox/incubator-**
 vxquery-dev/201310.mbox/%**3C1591541861.240305.**
 1381162348269.open-xchange%**40email.1und1.de%3E
 
 Regards,
 Dave
 
 On Oct 7, 2013, at 8:59 AM, Till wrote:
 
 Please verify and vote on the fourth release candidate for our first
> release apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating.
> 
> The tag to be voted on is
> 
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/incubator/vxquery/tags/**
> apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/
> 
> at revision 1528941.
> 
> The artifacts, signatures, md5, and sha1 are at:
> https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/**
> orgapachevxquery-128/org/**apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/**
> 0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-**0.2-incubating-source-release.**zip
> https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/**
> orgapachevxquery-128/org/**apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/**
> 0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-**0.2-incubating-source-release.**zip.asc
> https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/**
> orgapachevxquery-128/org/**apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/**
> 0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-**0.2-incubating-source-release.**zip.md5
> https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/**
> orgapachevxquery-128/org/**apache/vxquer

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache VXQuery Incubating 0.2 (RC4)

[ant elder]

Dave, (or any other Incubator PMC member), LEGAL-182 is almost closed now
saying this license use by VXQuery is ok, so would anyone give this the one
more +1 vote it needs to get the release out?

Many thanks,

   ...ant


On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Dave Fisher  wrote:

> HI Ant,
>
> On Oct 11, 2013, at 2:03 AM, ant elder wrote:
>
> > Dave/Vinayak,
> >
> > My understanding is that the ODC-BY license only needs to be run by ASF
> > legal if there is a concern about it, I've read the license when voting
> on
> > this and AFAICT its fine (and the package is not being modified so it
> could
> > be cat A or B), and its not listed as an excluded license at:
> > http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x. Are there any
> > particular clauses in the license that you have a concern about?
>
> IANAL - it is not on any list. I am not going to be an effective judge. If
> it is Class A then we are OK. If it is class B then it should not be in the
> source release, but should be pulled in from another location.
>
> This clause:
>
> > 2.4 Relationship to Contents in the Database. The individual items of
> the Contents contained in this Database may be covered by other rights,
> including copyright, patent, data protection, privacy, or personality
> rights, and this License does not cover any rights (other than Database
> Rights or in contract) in individual Contents contained in the Database.
> For example, if used on a Database of images (the Contents), this License
> would not apply to copyright over individual images, which could have their
> own separate licenses, or one single license covering all of the rights
> over the images. - See more at:
> http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/#sthash.z2xdvHcd.dpuf
>
> Further investigation into the contents may be required.
>
> >
> > Vinayak, the release does not need to be redone yet. If it really looks
> > like this will hold up getting another vote raise a ASF legal JIRA  (
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL) asking to confirm that
> ODC-BY
> > is ok.
>
> It holds me up.
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
> >
> >   ...ant
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Vinayak Borkar 
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Dave,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Before I can VOTE I have questions.
> >>>
> >>> (1) What is the following file?
> >>>
> >>>   A apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/**vxquery-core/src/test/**
> >>> resources/documents/dblp.xml.**gz
> >>>
> >>> Am I correct that this shows up in your LICENSE as:
> >>>
> >>>==**==**
> >>> ===
> >>>
> >>>The DBLP (http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/) database in
> >>>
> >>>vxquery-core/src/test/**resources/documents/dblp.xml.**gz
> >>>
> >>>can be used under the terms and conditions of the Open Data Commons
> >>>Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0). The full ODC-BY 1.0 license text
> >>>is avaialable at
> >>>
> >>>http://opendatacommons.org/**licenses/by/1.0/<
> http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/>
> >>>
> >>> I don't see this license on http://www.apache.org/legal/**3party.html<
> http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html>
> >>>
> >>> Can you show me a reference from the Legal Discuss list:
> >>>
> http://www.apache.org/**foundation/mailinglists.html#**foundation-legal<
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html#foundation-legal>that
> puts this in Class A? I think that this is required otherwise the
> >>> project will need to find a better way of packaging this source
> dependency.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> The file is a standard XML file that is used for unit testing the
> parsing
> >> capabilities of the software. It is not critical to the release itself.
> >>
> >> Just to confirm, if there is no such mention on the mailing lists, do we
> >> have to create a new release without this dependency?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Vinayak
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> (2) Does the podling intend in this VOTE to authorize the release of
> the
> >>> convenience binary artifacts that are also in the directory? I see from
> >>> discussions on the project that this is NOT intended. At least that is
> how
> >>> I view this email. [2]
> >>>
> >>> [2] http://mail-archives.apache.**org/mod_mbox/incubator-**
> >>> vxquery-dev/201310.mbox/%**3C1591541861.240305.**
> >>> 1381162348269.open-xchange%**40email.1und1.de%3E<
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-vxquery-dev/201310.mbox/%3C1591541861.240305.1381162348269.open-xchange%40email.1und1.de%3E
> >
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Dave
> >>>
> >>> On Oct 7, 2013, at 8:59 AM, Till wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Please verify and vote on the fourth release candidate for our first
>  release apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating.
> 
>  The tag to be voted on is
> 
>  https://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/incubator/vxquery/tags/**
>  apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/<
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/vxquery/tags/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/
> >
> 
>  at revision 1528941.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache VXQuery Incubating 0.2 (RC4)

[Till Westmann]

Hi Dave,

thank you for reviewing the release!

On Oct 10, 2013, at 6:31 PM, Dave Fisher  wrote:

> (2) Does the podling intend in this VOTE to authorize the release of the 
> convenience binary artifacts that are also in the directory? I see from 
> discussions on the project that this is NOT intended. At least that is how I 
> view this email. [2]
> 
> [2] 
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-vxquery-dev/201310.mbox/%3C1591541861.240305.1381162348269.open-xchange%40email.1und1.de%3E

It was not intended to also vote on the binary artifacts. As I understand it so 
far, the only thing that we can vote on and call a release is the source code. 
That's how I understand Roy's e-mail from March 2012 [1]

[1] 
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201203.mbox/%3c403e3618-d7c5-49c2-82b7-c41ec62bb...@gbiv.com%3E

Regards,
Till

> On Oct 7, 2013, at 8:59 AM, Till wrote:
> 
>> Please verify and vote on the fourth release candidate for our first release 
>> apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating.
>> 
>> The tag to be voted on is
>> 
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/vxquery/tags/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/
>> 
>> at revision 1528941.
>> 
>> The artifacts, signatures, md5, and sha1 are at:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-128/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-128/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.asc
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-128/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.md5
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-128/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.sha1
>> 
>> MD5:  381c212e2573b467855aa682a5e3ab22
>> SHA1: f07fe151ddea24457c6497a1abd48528f9c02462
>> 
>> The RAT report is at:
>> 
>> http://people.apache.org/~tillw/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/rat-report.txt
>> 
>> and the KEYS file containing the PGP keys used to sign the release can 
>> currently
>> be found at
>> 
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/vxquery/KEYS
>> 
>> The vote on vxquery-dev passed [1] with
>> 
>> +1 (binding)
>> Vinayak Borkar
>> Cezar Andrei
>> Jochen Wiedmann (IPMC)
>> Ant Elder (IPMC)
>> 
>> -1
>> none
>> 
>> Please vote
>> [ ] +1 release this package as apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating
>> [ ] -1 do not release this package because ...
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Till
>> 
>> 
>> [1] 
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-vxquery-dev/201310.mbox/%3C511917E5-9FC9-4B6C-9DE3-CF07EB4B69AB%40westmann.org%3E
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache VXQuery Incubating 0.2 (RC4)

[Dave Fisher]

HI Ant,

On Oct 11, 2013, at 2:03 AM, ant elder wrote:

> Dave/Vinayak,
> 
> My understanding is that the ODC-BY license only needs to be run by ASF
> legal if there is a concern about it, I've read the license when voting on
> this and AFAICT its fine (and the package is not being modified so it could
> be cat A or B), and its not listed as an excluded license at:
> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x. Are there any
> particular clauses in the license that you have a concern about?

IANAL - it is not on any list. I am not going to be an effective judge. If it 
is Class A then we are OK. If it is class B then it should not be in the source 
release, but should be pulled in from another location.

This clause:

> 2.4 Relationship to Contents in the Database. The individual items of the 
> Contents contained in this Database may be covered by other rights, including 
> copyright, patent, data protection, privacy, or personality rights, and this 
> License does not cover any rights (other than Database Rights or in contract) 
> in individual Contents contained in the Database. For example, if used on a 
> Database of images (the Contents), this License would not apply to copyright 
> over individual images, which could have their own separate licenses, or one 
> single license covering all of the rights over the images. - See more at: 
> http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/#sthash.z2xdvHcd.dpuf

Further investigation into the contents may be required.

> 
> Vinayak, the release does not need to be redone yet. If it really looks
> like this will hold up getting another vote raise a ASF legal JIRA  (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL) asking to confirm that ODC-BY
> is ok.

It holds me up.

Regards,
Dave

> 
>   ...ant
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Vinayak Borkar  wrote:
> 
>> Hi Dave,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Before I can VOTE I have questions.
>>> 
>>> (1) What is the following file?
>>> 
>>>   A apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/**vxquery-core/src/test/**
>>> resources/documents/dblp.xml.**gz
>>> 
>>> Am I correct that this shows up in your LICENSE as:
>>> 
>>>==**==**
>>> ===
>>> 
>>>The DBLP (http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/) database in
>>> 
>>>vxquery-core/src/test/**resources/documents/dblp.xml.**gz
>>> 
>>>can be used under the terms and conditions of the Open Data Commons
>>>Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0). The full ODC-BY 1.0 license text
>>>is avaialable at
>>> 
>>>
>>> http://opendatacommons.org/**licenses/by/1.0/
>>> 
>>> I don't see this license on 
>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/**3party.html
>>> 
>>> Can you show me a reference from the Legal Discuss list:
>>> http://www.apache.org/**foundation/mailinglists.html#**foundation-legalthat
>>>  puts this in Class A? I think that this is required otherwise the
>>> project will need to find a better way of packaging this source dependency.
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The file is a standard XML file that is used for unit testing the parsing
>> capabilities of the software. It is not critical to the release itself.
>> 
>> Just to confirm, if there is no such mention on the mailing lists, do we
>> have to create a new release without this dependency?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Vinayak
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> (2) Does the podling intend in this VOTE to authorize the release of the
>>> convenience binary artifacts that are also in the directory? I see from
>>> discussions on the project that this is NOT intended. At least that is how
>>> I view this email. [2]
>>> 
>>> [2] http://mail-archives.apache.**org/mod_mbox/incubator-**
>>> vxquery-dev/201310.mbox/%**3C1591541861.240305.**
>>> 1381162348269.open-xchange%**40email.1und1.de%3E
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Dave
>>> 
>>> On Oct 7, 2013, at 8:59 AM, Till wrote:
>>> 
>>> Please verify and vote on the fourth release candidate for our first
 release apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating.
 
 The tag to be voted on is
 
 https://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/incubator/vxquery/tags/**
 apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/
 
 at revision 1528941.
 
 The artifacts, signatures, md5, and sha1 are at:
 https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/**
 orgapachevxquery-128/org/**apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/**
 0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-**0.2-incubating-source-release.**zip
 https://repository.apache.org/**con

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache VXQuery Incubating 0.2 (RC4)

[ant elder]

Dave/Vinayak,

My understanding is that the ODC-BY license only needs to be run by ASF
legal if there is a concern about it, I've read the license when voting on
this and AFAICT its fine (and the package is not being modified so it could
be cat A or B), and its not listed as an excluded license at:
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x. Are there any
particular clauses in the license that you have a concern about?

Vinayak, the release does not need to be redone yet. If it really looks
like this will hold up getting another vote raise a ASF legal JIRA  (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL) asking to confirm that ODC-BY
is ok.

   ...ant



On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Vinayak Borkar  wrote:

> Hi Dave,
>
>
>
>  Before I can VOTE I have questions.
>>
>> (1) What is the following file?
>>
>>A apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/**vxquery-core/src/test/**
>> resources/documents/dblp.xml.**gz
>>
>> Am I correct that this shows up in your LICENSE as:
>>
>> ==**==**
>> ===
>>
>> The DBLP (http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/) database in
>>
>> vxquery-core/src/test/**resources/documents/dblp.xml.**gz
>>
>> can be used under the terms and conditions of the Open Data Commons
>> Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0). The full ODC-BY 1.0 license text
>> is avaialable at
>>
>> 
>> http://opendatacommons.org/**licenses/by/1.0/
>>
>> I don't see this license on 
>> http://www.apache.org/legal/**3party.html
>>
>> Can you show me a reference from the Legal Discuss list:
>> http://www.apache.org/**foundation/mailinglists.html#**foundation-legalthat
>>  puts this in Class A? I think that this is required otherwise the
>> project will need to find a better way of packaging this source dependency.
>>
>
>
> The file is a standard XML file that is used for unit testing the parsing
> capabilities of the software. It is not critical to the release itself.
>
> Just to confirm, if there is no such mention on the mailing lists, do we
> have to create a new release without this dependency?
>
> Thanks,
> Vinayak
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> (2) Does the podling intend in this VOTE to authorize the release of the
>> convenience binary artifacts that are also in the directory? I see from
>> discussions on the project that this is NOT intended. At least that is how
>> I view this email. [2]
>>
>> [2] http://mail-archives.apache.**org/mod_mbox/incubator-**
>> vxquery-dev/201310.mbox/%**3C1591541861.240305.**
>> 1381162348269.open-xchange%**40email.1und1.de%3E
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dave
>>
>> On Oct 7, 2013, at 8:59 AM, Till wrote:
>>
>>  Please verify and vote on the fourth release candidate for our first
>>> release apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating.
>>>
>>> The tag to be voted on is
>>>
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/incubator/vxquery/tags/**
>>> apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/
>>>
>>> at revision 1528941.
>>>
>>> The artifacts, signatures, md5, and sha1 are at:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/**
>>> orgapachevxquery-128/org/**apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/**
>>> 0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-**0.2-incubating-source-release.**zip
>>> https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/**
>>> orgapachevxquery-128/org/**apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/**
>>> 0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-**0.2-incubating-source-release.**zip.asc
>>> https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/**
>>> orgapachevxquery-128/org/**apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/**
>>> 0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-**0.2-incubating-source-release.**zip.md5
>>> https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/**
>>> orgapachevxquery-128/org/**apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/**
>>> 0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-**0.2-incubating-source-release.**zip.sha1
>>>
>>> MD5:  381c212e2573b467855aa682a5e3ab**22
>>> SHA1: f07fe151ddea24457c6497a1abd485**28f9c02462
>>>
>>> The RAT report is at:
>>>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache VXQuery Incubating 0.2 (RC4)

[Vinayak Borkar]

Hi Dave,



Before I can VOTE I have questions.

(1) What is the following file?

   A 
apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/vxquery-core/src/test/resources/documents/dblp.xml.gz

Am I correct that this shows up in your LICENSE as:

===

The DBLP (http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/) database in

vxquery-core/src/test/resources/documents/dblp.xml.gz

can be used under the terms and conditions of the Open Data Commons
Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0). The full ODC-BY 1.0 license text
is avaialable at

http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/

I don't see this license on http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html

Can you show me a reference from the Legal Discuss list: 
http://www.apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html#foundation-legal that puts 
this in Class A? I think that this is required otherwise the project will need 
to find a better way of packaging this source dependency.



The file is a standard XML file that is used for unit testing the 
parsing capabilities of the software. It is not critical to the release 
itself.


Just to confirm, if there is no such mention on the mailing lists, do we 
have to create a new release without this dependency?


Thanks,
Vinayak






(2) Does the podling intend in this VOTE to authorize the release of the 
convenience binary artifacts that are also in the directory? I see from 
discussions on the project that this is NOT intended. At least that is how I 
view this email. [2]

[2] 
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-vxquery-dev/201310.mbox/%3C1591541861.240305.1381162348269.open-xchange%40email.1und1.de%3E

Regards,
Dave

On Oct 7, 2013, at 8:59 AM, Till wrote:


Please verify and vote on the fourth release candidate for our first release 
apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating.

The tag to be voted on is

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/vxquery/tags/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/

at revision 1528941.

The artifacts, signatures, md5, and sha1 are at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-128/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-128/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.asc
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-128/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.md5
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-128/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.sha1

MD5:  381c212e2573b467855aa682a5e3ab22
SHA1: f07fe151ddea24457c6497a1abd48528f9c02462

The RAT report is at:

http://people.apache.org/~tillw/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/rat-report.txt

and the KEYS file containing the PGP keys used to sign the release can currently
be found at

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/vxquery/KEYS

The vote on vxquery-dev passed [1] with

+1 (binding)
Vinayak Borkar
Cezar Andrei
Jochen Wiedmann (IPMC)
Ant Elder (IPMC)

-1
none

Please vote
[ ] +1 release this package as apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating
[ ] -1 do not release this package because ...

Thanks,
Till


[1] 
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-vxquery-dev/201310.mbox/%3C511917E5-9FC9-4B6C-9DE3-CF07EB4B69AB%40westmann.org%3E

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache VXQuery Incubating 0.2 (RC4)

[Dave Fisher]

Hi -

I checked the source release and the signatures check out.

Before I can VOTE I have questions.

(1) What is the following file?

  A 
apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/vxquery-core/src/test/resources/documents/dblp.xml.gz

Am I correct that this shows up in your LICENSE as:

   ===

   The DBLP (http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/) database in

   vxquery-core/src/test/resources/documents/dblp.xml.gz

   can be used under the terms and conditions of the Open Data Commons
   Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0). The full ODC-BY 1.0 license text
   is avaialable at

   http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/

I don't see this license on http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html

Can you show me a reference from the Legal Discuss list: 
http://www.apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html#foundation-legal that puts 
this in Class A? I think that this is required otherwise the project will need 
to find a better way of packaging this source dependency.

(2) Does the podling intend in this VOTE to authorize the release of the 
convenience binary artifacts that are also in the directory? I see from 
discussions on the project that this is NOT intended. At least that is how I 
view this email. [2]

[2] 
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-vxquery-dev/201310.mbox/%3C1591541861.240305.1381162348269.open-xchange%40email.1und1.de%3E

Regards,
Dave

On Oct 7, 2013, at 8:59 AM, Till wrote:

> Please verify and vote on the fourth release candidate for our first release 
> apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating.
> 
> The tag to be voted on is
> 
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/vxquery/tags/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/
> 
> at revision 1528941.
> 
> The artifacts, signatures, md5, and sha1 are at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-128/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-128/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.asc
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-128/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.md5
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-128/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.sha1
> 
> MD5:  381c212e2573b467855aa682a5e3ab22
> SHA1: f07fe151ddea24457c6497a1abd48528f9c02462
> 
> The RAT report is at:
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~tillw/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/rat-report.txt
> 
> and the KEYS file containing the PGP keys used to sign the release can 
> currently
> be found at
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/vxquery/KEYS
> 
> The vote on vxquery-dev passed [1] with
> 
> +1 (binding)
> Vinayak Borkar
> Cezar Andrei
> Jochen Wiedmann (IPMC)
> Ant Elder (IPMC)
> 
> -1
> none
> 
> Please vote
> [ ] +1 release this package as apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating
> [ ] -1 do not release this package because ...
> 
> Thanks,
> Till
> 
> 
> [1] 
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-vxquery-dev/201310.mbox/%3C511917E5-9FC9-4B6C-9DE3-CF07EB4B69AB%40westmann.org%3E
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache VXQuery Incubating 0.2 (RC4)

[Vinayak Borkar]

Guys,


It has been over 72 hours since the vote for the first VXQuery release 
has been open, and we still do not have the one vote we need from an 
IPMC member. I am unsure how this process works. Until a few weeks ago, 
we heard from quite a few vocal IPMC members about how the project did 
not deserve to remain in incubation because it was unable to make a 
release. Now there is an attempt at a release that has been voted in by 
the PPMC, but there is complete radio silence on the vote. I appeal to 
the same people who expressed their opinions a few weeks ago to at least 
look at the release we have created and vote either for or against it.


Thanks,
Vinayak



On 10/9/13 6:30 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:

You have two IPMC votes. You need one more IPMC vote to pass.

On Oct 8, 2013, at 12:28 PM, Vinayak Borkar wrote:


Dear general@,

A few weeks ago, there were concerns raised about the VXQuery project's ability 
to make releases. We now have an RC that has been voted for by the PPMC and is 
up for a vote with the IPMC. I just wanted to take this opportunity to 
encourage the IPMC to cast a vote to move the process along.

On a related note, do the IPMC members who are also part of the PPMC need to 
vote again on this thread to count towards the three IPMC votes?

Thanks,
Vinayak


On 10/7/13 8:59 AM, Till wrote:

Please verify and vote on the fourth release candidate for our first release 
apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating.

The tag to be voted on is

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/vxquery/tags/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/

at revision 1528941.

The artifacts, signatures, md5, and sha1 are at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-128/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-128/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.asc
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-128/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.md5
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-128/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.sha1

MD5:  381c212e2573b467855aa682a5e3ab22
SHA1: f07fe151ddea24457c6497a1abd48528f9c02462

The RAT report is at:

http://people.apache.org/~tillw/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/rat-report.txt

and the KEYS file containing the PGP keys used to sign the release can currently
be found at

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/vxquery/KEYS

The vote on vxquery-dev passed [1] with

+1 (binding)
Vinayak Borkar
Cezar Andrei
Jochen Wiedmann (IPMC)
Ant Elder (IPMC)

-1
none

Please vote
[ ] +1 release this package as apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating
[ ] -1 do not release this package because ...

Thanks,
Till


[1] 
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-vxquery-dev/201310.mbox/%3C511917E5-9FC9-4B6C-9DE3-CF07EB4B69AB%40westmann.org%3E

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache VXQuery Incubating 0.2 (RC4)

[Dave Fisher]

You have two IPMC votes. You need one more IPMC vote to pass.

On Oct 8, 2013, at 12:28 PM, Vinayak Borkar wrote:

> Dear general@,
> 
> A few weeks ago, there were concerns raised about the VXQuery project's 
> ability to make releases. We now have an RC that has been voted for by the 
> PPMC and is up for a vote with the IPMC. I just wanted to take this 
> opportunity to encourage the IPMC to cast a vote to move the process along.
> 
> On a related note, do the IPMC members who are also part of the PPMC need to 
> vote again on this thread to count towards the three IPMC votes?
> 
> Thanks,
> Vinayak
> 
> 
> On 10/7/13 8:59 AM, Till wrote:
>> Please verify and vote on the fourth release candidate for our first release 
>> apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating.
>> 
>> The tag to be voted on is
>> 
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/vxquery/tags/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/
>> 
>> at revision 1528941.
>> 
>> The artifacts, signatures, md5, and sha1 are at:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-128/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-128/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.asc
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-128/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.md5
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-128/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.sha1
>> 
>> MD5:  381c212e2573b467855aa682a5e3ab22
>> SHA1: f07fe151ddea24457c6497a1abd48528f9c02462
>> 
>> The RAT report is at:
>> 
>> http://people.apache.org/~tillw/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/rat-report.txt
>> 
>> and the KEYS file containing the PGP keys used to sign the release can 
>> currently
>> be found at
>> 
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/vxquery/KEYS
>> 
>> The vote on vxquery-dev passed [1] with
>> 
>> +1 (binding)
>> Vinayak Borkar
>> Cezar Andrei
>> Jochen Wiedmann (IPMC)
>> Ant Elder (IPMC)
>> 
>> -1
>> none
>> 
>> Please vote
>> [ ] +1 release this package as apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating
>> [ ] -1 do not release this package because ...
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Till
>> 
>> 
>> [1] 
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-vxquery-dev/201310.mbox/%3C511917E5-9FC9-4B6C-9DE3-CF07EB4B69AB%40westmann.org%3E
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache VXQuery Incubating 0.2 (RC4)

[Vinayak Borkar]

Dear general@,

A few weeks ago, there were concerns raised about the VXQuery project's 
ability to make releases. We now have an RC that has been voted for by 
the PPMC and is up for a vote with the IPMC. I just wanted to take this 
opportunity to encourage the IPMC to cast a vote to move the process along.


On a related note, do the IPMC members who are also part of the PPMC 
need to vote again on this thread to count towards the three IPMC votes?


Thanks,
Vinayak


On 10/7/13 8:59 AM, Till wrote:

Please verify and vote on the fourth release candidate for our first release 
apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating.

The tag to be voted on is

https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/vxquery/tags/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/

at revision 1528941.

The artifacts, signatures, md5, and sha1 are at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-128/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-128/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.asc
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-128/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.md5
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-128/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.sha1

MD5:  381c212e2573b467855aa682a5e3ab22
SHA1: f07fe151ddea24457c6497a1abd48528f9c02462

The RAT report is at:

http://people.apache.org/~tillw/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/rat-report.txt

and the KEYS file containing the PGP keys used to sign the release can currently
be found at

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/vxquery/KEYS

The vote on vxquery-dev passed [1] with

+1 (binding)
Vinayak Borkar
Cezar Andrei
Jochen Wiedmann (IPMC)
Ant Elder (IPMC)

-1
none

Please vote
[ ] +1 release this package as apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating
[ ] -1 do not release this package because ...

Thanks,
Till


[1] 
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-vxquery-dev/201310.mbox/%3C511917E5-9FC9-4B6C-9DE3-CF07EB4B69AB%40westmann.org%3E

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org