Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta
My unsolicited opinion: projects focused on the manipulation and purveyance of data as XML could/should belong in the xml.apache.org project while implementations of Java technologies associate with Jakarta. There's nothing Java specific about XML-RPC and SOAP (buh, that's the point). If I had my druthers, slide and other projects that have nothing to do with implementations of Java technologies per se but happen to be implemented using Java shouldn't be part of Jakarta (nothing against slide but content management and WebDAV are not Java technologies per se). Ergo, the Helma XML-RPC project, if it should be an Apache project at all, belongs with SOAP, Xerces, Xalan and so forth (irrespective of the fact that they are implementented in Java); they are implementations of XML technologies and therefore belong in under the xml.apache.org umbrella; Jason van Zyl's shrill complaint otherwise not withstanding. cheers, -Ian -- Ian Kallen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | AIM: iankallen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta
On 7/3/01 8:56 PM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jason van Zyl wrote: >> >> You have totally side stepped the fact that no at xml.apache.org is >> interested in XML-RPC. What exactly is the interest level in >> XML-RPC? I honestly don't know a whole lot about SOAP, but I have >> been using XML-RPC for a long while now and it's simple and works >> great. > > Hmmm. I guess it is fair to say that Turbine is not interested in > integrating with Cocoon. If you ignore the recent warm welcome that Berin > has seen, and focus just on the fact that this work has never bubbled to > the top of any existing turbine committers todo list, then I guess it must > be true. I would definitely say that is a fair summation. No one is interested or someone would be working on it. Berin is now, out of a requirement and that¹s great if Turbine and Cocoon work together eventually that's great. > XML-RPC has not bubbled to the top of my todo list at the moment. That's because you have no real need for it I would say. It fits in with the plans for axis but it seems xml-rpc hasn't bubbled anywhere near the top of anyone's todo list. I might eventually use axis, but integrating xml-rpc into axis isn't on the top of my todo list either. > But I > will warmly welcome anybody who wishes to work on it. But that's never happened though, has it? The presence of an xml-rpc package at apache may cause someone to pick up that torch but I don't see why the package being at xml.apache.org would improve those odds. >> If you are suggesting that the code be immediately be absorbed >> into xml-soap than I definitely don't agree. Is that what you're >> suggesting? > > Can you honestly say that you have done your homework? Again you are not answering the question. What homework do I have to do Sam? I proposed a package that is self contained, self sustaining, and completely independent of any other project at Apache. It may certainly be related to other projects, I agree with that. But my immediate concern is a home for the package, not trying to integrate it with axis. > All I ask is that if/when you do, you approach the problem with an open > mind and a can do attitude, not simply look for reasons why it can't work. I still don't know what you mean exactly by 'can't work' work because so far it is entirely unclear what you would actually do with the code. Let's say I'm Hannes and offer you the XML-RPC code, what exactly is the proposal you would make on [EMAIL PROTECTED] A simple paragraph stating what you would like to do with the code would help me a lot in understanding your POV. I have tried to contact Hannes to see what he thinks, I've asked him to join the list and join the discussion. > And I will promise to meet you more than half way. I would be glad to meet you half way when I know what direction you're walking in. > - Sam Ruby > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- jvz. Jason van Zyl http://tambora.zenplex.org http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria http://jakarta.apache.org/commons - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta
Jason van Zyl wrote: > > You have totally side stepped the fact that no at xml.apache.org is > interested in XML-RPC. What exactly is the interest level in > XML-RPC? I honestly don't know a whole lot about SOAP, but I have > been using XML-RPC for a long while now and it's simple and works > great. Hmmm. I guess it is fair to say that Turbine is not interested in integrating with Cocoon. If you ignore the recent warm welcome that Berin has seen, and focus just on the fact that this work has never bubbled to the top of any existing turbine committers todo list, then I guess it must be true. XML-RPC has not bubble to the top of my todo list at the moment.But I will warmly welcome anybody who wishes to work on it. > If you are suggesting that the code be immediately be absorbed > into xml-soap than I definitely don't agree. Is that what you're > suggesting? Can you honestly say that you have done your homework? All I ask is that if/when you do, you approach the problem with an open mind and a can do attitude, not simply look for reasons why it can't work. And I will promise to meet you more than half way. - Sam Ruby - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta
On 7/3/01 8:34 PM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jason van Zyl wrote: >> >> I think that was a knee jerk reaction to seeing XML in the project name. >> Fair enough. You've had two people so far. > > Not fair. I can't speak for others, but I am an active committer on > xml-soap and xml-apache (two different projects only in the sense that > Tomcat 3 and 4 are, so it is in all how you count). And Jon specifically > did call out the potential relationship with soap. > > My two cents: the first path should always be to work within existing > projects. If/when that fails, then pursue alternatives. > > I've not seen anybody on your list on the xml-axis mailing list. Give it a > whirl. Together, we can do more then separately... You have totally side stepped the fact that no at xml.apache.org is interested in XML-RPC. What exactly is the interest level in XML-RPC? I honestly don't know a whole lot about SOAP, but I have been using XML-RPC for a long while now and it's simple and works great. If you are suggesting that the code be immediately be absorbed into xml-soap than I definitely don't agree. Is that what you're suggesting? > - Sam Ruby > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- jvz. Jason van Zyl http://tambora.zenplex.org http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria http://jakarta.apache.org/commons - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta
On 7/3/01 8:10 PM, "Pier P. Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sam Ruby at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> I strongly believe that any any such nomination should be to >> xml.apache.org. > > I agree 100% with Sam... Again, that's an unqualified response. I responsed to Sam when he clarified his position. I will gladly respond to yours when you do the same. > Pier > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- jvz. Jason van Zyl http://tambora.zenplex.org http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria http://jakarta.apache.org/commons - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta
Jason van Zyl wrote: > > I think that was a knee jerk reaction to seeing XML in the project name. > Fair enough. You've had two people so far. Not fair. I can't speak for others, but I am an active committer on xml-soap and xml-apache (two different projects only in the sense that Tomcat 3 and 4 are, so it is in all how you count). And Jon specifically did call out the potential relationship with soap. My two cents: the first path should always be to work within existing projects. If/when that fails, then pursue alternatives. I've not seen anybody on your list on the xml-axis mailing list. Give it a whirl. Together, we can do more then separately... - Sam Ruby - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta
Sam Ruby at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I strongly believe that any any such nomination should be to > xml.apache.org. I agree 100% with Sam... Pier - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta
On 7/3/01 4:36 PM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jason van Zyl wrote: >> >>> I strongly believe that any any such nomination should be to >>> xml.apache.org. >> >> Reasons? > > The xml-axis project is a restructuring of xml-soap. This restructuring > was initiated with the expressed intent of providing a foundation for > supporting multiple protocols, including, XML-RPC. To date, however, we > have been unsuccessful in getting anyone interested enough to work on > supporting the XML-RPC protocol. I find that a very unconvincing argument. You suggest having the XML-RPC package housed at xml.apache.org because no one is interested in it. No one at xml.apache.org did the leg work to find an XML-RPC implementation whose author was willing to donate it. If there is such a lack of interest in XML-RPC I definitely feel that Jakarta is a better place for it. If there eventual interest than there is no reason why the XML-RPC package can't be integrated into xml-axis. But at present you say there is no interest, so I would say xml.apache.org is not the right place for the XML-RPC package. You yourself would like to see XML-RPC integrated into xml-axis but as yet no one has done anything about it. > This being said, I don't want to pre-judge the result as to whether or not > the current Axis code base is a good fit; it might very well be appropriate > that these two projects belong side by side. Don't get me wrong, my clear > preference is for the former, but if the latter is meant to be, then so be > it. But side by side, not pitting one PMC against another within Apache > land. I think you're jumping the gun here. I think the project should definitely start on its own. If someone is interested in integrating the XML-RPC code into xml-axis than they are free to do so. Whether the code will fit with axis is an irrelevant question at this point in time. > Additionally, the Jakarta project is a bit on the large side, so I am > concerned about growth - that in itself is not a showstopper, but is a > concern and if there is at least an equally good fit in xml, then that is a > better home. I fail to see your reasoning. How is managing another package less a burden to one project and not another? It's another project at Apache and will require time and resources. The initial set of committers will go where the code goes. Jakarta has 18 projects, xml.apache.org has 14. So I don't see that as a convincing argument either. If you are saying that Apache as a whole should slow down in absorbing more projects, than I would probably agree with you. > Also note that the XML PMC has taken a different path, there > is not a mapping of PMC members to subprojects; this being said, if the > right home for XML-RPC is in xml.apache, then I will promise to watch over > it (I am a PMC member there). I appreciate the sentiment :-) > I also noted that a number of other Jakarta PMC members expressed similar > concerns, presumably without my prompting. I think that was a knee jerk reaction to seeing XML in the project name. Fair enough. You've had two people so far. My reasons for Jakarta are 1) The impetus for the proposal came from the initial list of committers who are involved in Jakarta. I think our wishes should count for something. And we decided to make the proposal here after some discussion. 2) I don't think xml.apache.org would provide a good fit because a) no one started an xml-rpc implementation for xml-axis and b) no one tried to find anyone with an existing implementation. How could xml.apache.org be a better or even equal fit. I would like this not to drag out. The initial list of committers would prefer this to be a Jakarta project. I would like to vote and go from there. > - Sam Ruby > > P.S. A quick peek at the code base - no Ant, yet another XML parser > (non-JAXP, non-Apache). Not insurmountable, but it would be nice to be > fixed... I have the latest code with an Ant build that Josh Lucas cleaned up, and it uses xerces as the default parser. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- jvz. Jason van Zyl http://tambora.zenplex.org http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria http://jakarta.apache.org/commons - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Licensing question
on 7/3/01 1:34 PM, "Ceki Gülcü" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > We have a developer who would like to contribute a piece of code under the > Apache software license but at the same time would like to keep using the same > piece of code under a different (the original) license. I am sure this not the > first time this happens. How did the foundation deal with the situation in the > past? > > TIA, Ceki There is no problem with that. She owns the copyright on her version of the code and the ASF owns the copyright on the version donated to the ASF. -jon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta
Jason van Zyl wrote: > >> I strongly believe that any any such nomination should be to >> xml.apache.org. > > Reasons? The xml-axis project is a restructuring of xml-soap. This restructuring was initiated with the expressed intent of providing a foundation for supporting multiple protocols, including, XML-RPC. To date, however, we have been unsuccessful in getting anyone interested enough to work on supporting the XML-RPC protocol. This being said, I don't want to pre-judge the result as to whether or not the current Axis code base is a good fit; it might very well be appropriate that these two projects belong side by side. Don't get me wrong, my clear preference is for the former, but if the latter is meant to be, then so be it. But side by side, not pitting one PMC against another within Apache land. Additionally, the Jakarta project is a bit on the large side, so I am concerned about growth - that in itself is not a showstopper, but is a concern and if there is at least an equally good fit in xml, then that is a better home. Also note that the XML PMC has taken a different path, there is not a mapping of PMC members to subprojects; this being said, if the right home for XML-RPC is in xml.apache, then I will promise to watch over it (I am a PMC member there). I also noted that a number of other Jakarta PMC members expressed similar concerns, presumably without my prompting. - Sam Ruby P.S. A quick peek at the code base - no Ant, yet another XML parser (non-JAXP, non-Apache). Not insurmountable, but it would be nice to be fixed... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Licensing question
Hello, We have a developer who would like to contribute a piece of code under the Apache software license but at the same time would like to keep using the same piece of code under a different (the original) license. I am sure this not the first time this happens. How did the foundation deal with the situation in the past? TIA, Ceki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta
Jason makes a very good point. I believe we could see XML-RPC become a integral component to other jakarta projects. Terry McBride --- Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/3/01 11:27 AM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > I strongly believe that any any such nomination > should be to > > xml.apache.org. > > Reasons? > > It does use XML, sure, but it is primarily a set of > servers and > clients which I think fits in more with Jakarta. > It's an XML > technology, but so is the digester in the commons, > Jetspeed was > going to move to xml.apache.org but landed in > jakarta. Ant is a tool > that uses XML exclusively (right now anyway) and > it's in Jakarta. > > I'm not fussy where it is nominated, but being an > xml.apache.org project > means I cannot volunteer to be the PMC member to > watch over it. And that is > certainly one of the reasons I proposed it here. I > also think it makes > sense to have XML-RPC land in the project where most > of the initial > committers are involved and that¹s Jakarta. > > What's important is trying to find a home for the > XML-RPC package. > So if we decide that Jakarta isn't the place for it, > though I > believe it is, than should I post the same proposal > to > [EMAIL PROTECTED]? > > > > > - Sam Ruby > > > > > > Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 07/03/2001 > 10:19:36 AM > > > > Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > cc: > > Subject: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > I would like to propose the movement of the Helma > XML-RCP package > > (http://xmlrpc.helma.org/) to Jakarta. The Helma > XML-RPC package > > is the most popular OSS XML-RPC package and Hannes > > Wallnoefer would like to donate the code to the > Jakarta project. > > > > There is an active community based around the > package but organizing the > > effort is something that Hannes would like some > help with. > > > > The Helma XML-RPC package is used extensively in > Turbine, > > will be used extensively by CollabNet, and is used > in the Helma > > project itself so interest will not drop off any > time in the > > near future. > > > > There is full documentation for the XML-RPC > package, and we are > > working on a test bed so the code is in good shape > and healthy. > > I am also willing to be the PMC member that > oversees the project. > > > > We have an initial committers list as follows: > > > > Hannes Wallnoefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > John Thorhauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Leonard Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Josh Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > There are also people on the XML-RPC dev list that > are not > > listed here but who are active. So it is likely > that > > this list will double in size very shortly. > > > > Thoughts? > > -- > > > > jvz. > > > > Jason van Zyl > > > > http://tambora.zenplex.org > > http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine > > http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity > > http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria > > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > > jvz. > > Jason van Zyl > > http://tambora.zenplex.org > http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine > http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity > http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta
On 7/3/01 11:27 AM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I strongly believe that any any such nomination should be to > xml.apache.org. Reasons? It does use XML, sure, but it is primarily a set of servers and clients which I think fits in more with Jakarta. It's an XML technology, but so is the digester in the commons, Jetspeed was going to move to xml.apache.org but landed in jakarta. Ant is a tool that uses XML exclusively (right now anyway) and it's in Jakarta. I'm not fussy where it is nominated, but being an xml.apache.org project means I cannot volunteer to be the PMC member to watch over it. And that is certainly one of the reasons I proposed it here. I also think it makes sense to have XML-RPC land in the project where most of the initial committers are involved and that¹s Jakarta. What's important is trying to find a home for the XML-RPC package. So if we decide that Jakarta isn't the place for it, though I believe it is, than should I post the same proposal to [EMAIL PROTECTED]? > > - Sam Ruby > > > Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 07/03/2001 10:19:36 AM > > Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > cc: > Subject: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta > > > > Hello, > > I would like to propose the movement of the Helma XML-RCP package > (http://xmlrpc.helma.org/) to Jakarta. The Helma XML-RPC package > is the most popular OSS XML-RPC package and Hannes > Wallnoefer would like to donate the code to the Jakarta project. > > There is an active community based around the package but organizing the > effort is something that Hannes would like some help with. > > The Helma XML-RPC package is used extensively in Turbine, > will be used extensively by CollabNet, and is used in the Helma > project itself so interest will not drop off any time in the > near future. > > There is full documentation for the XML-RPC package, and we are > working on a test bed so the code is in good shape and healthy. > I am also willing to be the PMC member that oversees the project. > > We have an initial committers list as follows: > > Hannes Wallnoefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > John Thorhauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Leonard Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Josh Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > There are also people on the XML-RPC dev list that are not > listed here but who are active. So it is likely that > this list will double in size very shortly. > > Thoughts? > -- > > jvz. > > Jason van Zyl > > http://tambora.zenplex.org > http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine > http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity > http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- jvz. Jason van Zyl http://tambora.zenplex.org http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria http://jakarta.apache.org/commons - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta
Jason van Zyl wrote: > > Hello, > > I would like to propose the movement of the Helma XML-RCP package > (http://xmlrpc.helma.org/) to Jakarta. The Helma XML-RPC package > is the most popular OSS XML-RPC package and Hannes > Wallnoefer would like to donate the code to the Jakarta project. > > There is an active community based around the package but organizing the > effort is something that Hannes would like some help with. > > The Helma XML-RPC package is used extensively in Turbine, > will be used extensively by CollabNet, and is used in the Helma > project itself so interest will not drop off any time in the > near future. > > There is full documentation for the XML-RPC package, and we are > working on a test bed so the code is in good shape and healthy. > I am also willing to be the PMC member that oversees the project. > > We have an initial committers list as follows: > > Hannes Wallnoefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > John Thorhauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Leonard Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Josh Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > There are also people on the XML-RPC dev list that are not > listed here but who are active. So it is likely that > this list will double in size very shortly. > > Thoughts? Does that belong here in Jakarta or in XML land? Either way, +1 from me, btw. geir -- Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] System and Software Consulting Developing for the web? See http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/ You have a genius for suggesting things I've come a cropper with! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta
on 7/3/01 7:19 AM, "Jason van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to propose the movement of the Helma XML-RCP package > (http://xmlrpc.helma.org/) to Jakarta. The Helma XML-RPC package > is the most popular OSS XML-RPC package and Hannes > Wallnoefer would like to donate the code to the Jakarta project. Since SOAP is already over on xml.apache.org, shouldn't this go there as well? -jon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta
>I would like to propose the movement of the Helma XML-RCP package >(http://xmlrpc.helma.org/) to Jakarta. The Helma XML-RPC package >is the most popular OSS XML-RPC package and Hannes >Wallnoefer would like to donate the code to the Jakarta project. > >There is an active community based around the package but >organizing the >effort is something that Hannes would like some help with. > >The Helma XML-RPC package is used extensively in Turbine, >will be used extensively by CollabNet, and is used in the Helma >project itself so interest will not drop off any time in the >near future. > >There is full documentation for the XML-RPC package, and we are >working on a test bed so the code is in good shape and healthy. >I am also willing to be the PMC member that oversees the project. I'm not in PMC but that's an interesting work which may be for usefull in jakarta-tomcat (and its connectors)... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta
I strongly believe that any any such nomination should be to xml.apache.org. - Sam Ruby Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 07/03/2001 10:19:36 AM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta Hello, I would like to propose the movement of the Helma XML-RCP package (http://xmlrpc.helma.org/) to Jakarta. The Helma XML-RPC package is the most popular OSS XML-RPC package and Hannes Wallnoefer would like to donate the code to the Jakarta project. There is an active community based around the package but organizing the effort is something that Hannes would like some help with. The Helma XML-RPC package is used extensively in Turbine, will be used extensively by CollabNet, and is used in the Helma project itself so interest will not drop off any time in the near future. There is full documentation for the XML-RPC package, and we are working on a test bed so the code is in good shape and healthy. I am also willing to be the PMC member that oversees the project. We have an initial committers list as follows: Hannes Wallnoefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John Thorhauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Leonard Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Josh Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> There are also people on the XML-RPC dev list that are not listed here but who are active. So it is likely that this list will double in size very shortly. Thoughts? -- jvz. Jason van Zyl http://tambora.zenplex.org http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria http://jakarta.apache.org/commons - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta
Hello, I would like to propose the movement of the Helma XML-RCP package (http://xmlrpc.helma.org/) to Jakarta. The Helma XML-RPC package is the most popular OSS XML-RPC package and Hannes Wallnoefer would like to donate the code to the Jakarta project. There is an active community based around the package but organizing the effort is something that Hannes would like some help with. The Helma XML-RPC package is used extensively in Turbine, will be used extensively by CollabNet, and is used in the Helma project itself so interest will not drop off any time in the near future. There is full documentation for the XML-RPC package, and we are working on a test bed so the code is in good shape and healthy. I am also willing to be the PMC member that oversees the project. We have an initial committers list as follows: Hannes Wallnoefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John Thorhauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Leonard Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Josh Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> There are also people on the XML-RPC dev list that are not listed here but who are active. So it is likely that this list will double in size very shortly. Thoughts? -- jvz. Jason van Zyl http://tambora.zenplex.org http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria http://jakarta.apache.org/commons - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
