On 7/3/01 8:34 PM, "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>
>> I think that was a knee jerk reaction to seeing XML in the project name.
>> Fair enough. You've had two people so far.
>
> Not fair. I can't speak for others, but I am an active committer on
> xml-soap and xml-apache (two different projects only in the sense that
> Tomcat 3 and 4 are, so it is in all how you count). And Jon specifically
> did call out the potential relationship with soap.
>
> My two cents: the first path should always be to work within existing
> projects. If/when that fails, then pursue alternatives.
>
> I've not seen anybody on your list on the xml-axis mailing list. Give it a
> whirl. Together, we can do more then separately...
You have totally side stepped the fact that no at xml.apache.org is
interested in XML-RPC. What exactly is the interest level in
XML-RPC? I honestly don't know a whole lot about SOAP, but I have
been using XML-RPC for a long while now and it's simple and works
great.
If you are suggesting that the code be immediately be absorbed
into xml-soap than I definitely don't agree. Is that what you're
suggesting?
> - Sam Ruby
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
http://tambora.zenplex.org
http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine
http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
