Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta

2001-07-05 Thread Pier P. Fumagalli

Hannes Wallnoefer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 To put it right upfront, I don't think XML-RPC is a natural fit for
 xml.apache.org, and I'd prefer to see it at Jakarta. Let me explain.

Even though I see your point, I'd still prefer seeing it over in XML
alongside with the other technologies doing the same exact thing...

Jakarta has alrady a wide enough spectrum of problems covered (from build
systems, to ioc frameworks). From what I can see, XML-RPC is based on XML
(or a subset of it), is used to transmit objects and call methods over HTTP
(same as SOAP), s, since it's an alternative to SOAP, it should go
alongside with it.

-1 for XML-RPC on Jakarta...

Pier


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta

2001-07-05 Thread Jason van Zyl

On 7/5/01 7:55 AM, Pier P. Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hannes Wallnoefer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 To put it right upfront, I don't think XML-RPC is a natural fit for
 xml.apache.org, and I'd prefer to see it at Jakarta. Let me explain.
 
 Even though I see your point, I'd still prefer seeing it over in XML
 alongside with the other technologies doing the same exact thing...
 
 Jakarta has alrady a wide enough spectrum of problems covered (from build
 systems, to ioc frameworks). From what I can see, XML-RPC is based on XML
 (or a subset of it), is used to transmit objects and call methods over HTTP
 (same as SOAP), s, since it's an alternative to SOAP, it should go
 alongside with it.
 
 -1 for XML-RPC on Jakarta...

So you would be amenable to the XML-RPC package being an independent
project under the xml.apache.org banner?
 
   Pier
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 

jvz.

Jason van Zyl

http://tambora.zenplex.org
http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine
http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta

2001-07-05 Thread Jason van Zyl

On 7/5/01 7:55 AM, Pier P. Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hannes Wallnoefer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 To put it right upfront, I don't think XML-RPC is a natural fit for
 xml.apache.org, and I'd prefer to see it at Jakarta. Let me explain.
 
 Even though I see your point, I'd still prefer seeing it over in XML
 alongside with the other technologies doing the same exact thing...
 
 Jakarta has alrady a wide enough spectrum of problems covered (from build
 systems, to ioc frameworks). From what I can see, XML-RPC is based on XML
 (or a subset of it), is used to transmit objects and call methods over HTTP
 (same as SOAP), s, since it's an alternative to SOAP, it should go
 alongside with it.
 
 -1 for XML-RPC on Jakarta...

Would anyone else on the Jakarta PMC care to vote?

I think there are 10 Jakarta PMC members can we get a quick
vote. So if anyone else has a -1 than that will put an end
to the proposal, right? We need 8/10 for the 3/4 minimum so
one more -1 and it's a goner.

So, this is for the inclusion the XML-RPC package in Jakarta

[  ]Peter Donald
[-1]Pier Fumagalli
[  ]Ted Husted
[  ]Ceki Gülcü
[  ]Geir Magnusson
[  ]Craig McClanahan
[-1]Sam Ruby
[  ]Dan Savarese
[  ]Jon Stevens
[+1]Jason van Zyl

I would like to try this avenue first as it's what the author wants.

-- 

jvz.

Jason van Zyl

http://tambora.zenplex.org
http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine
http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




I find this funny...

2001-07-05 Thread Jon Stevens

ASP-JSP Translation...

http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,5092884,00.html

I'm sure that this was one of Sun's goals all along when they created JSP.
Unfortunately, the goal didn't seem to be more than that...like making JSP a
really good and innovative technology.

:-)

-jon

-- 
If you come from a Perl or PHP background, JSP is a way to take
your pain to new levels. --Anonymous
http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/ymtd/ymtd.html


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta

2001-07-05 Thread Jason van Zyl

On 7/5/01 1:08 PM, Ted Leung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hello all,
 
 It is not true that there is no interest in XML-RPC at xml.apache.org.  I
 would be
 amenable to / in-favor of XML RPC being an independent project under
 xml.apache.org.  I would prefer it if we could find a way to make this fit
 in with Axis,
 assuming that the respective committers can get along and make it work.

We would prefer that the project be independent at first. None of the
initial committers have much experience with xml.apache.org and would
like to gradually move toward collaborating. As I've said before this
is a self contained project and it is used that way. I have no doubt
that the code can be integrated into Axis in some form, but this
is not our primary motive for bringing the code to apache.
 
 The whole point of having a separate XML project is for XML related
 code-bases
 to go there.  With a name like XML-RPC, it is hard to argue that XML-RPC
 is not an XML related project.  Please don't try to circumvent the structure
 that the ASF
 has put in place.   As someone pointed out, If we were talking about a C or
 C++
 implementation of XML-RPC, then I don't think we would be arguing about
 where this
 particular code base belongs.

Fair enough, I will no longer argue the point. My main concern is that
the project be granted full autonomy as a project initially as Hannes
and the rest of the committers become accustomed to xml.apache.org than
we can discuss the possible integration with Axis.

Does this sound reasonable?

 
 Ted Leung
 Chair XML PMC
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 7:18 AM
 Subject: Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta
 
 
 On 7/5/01 7:55 AM, Pier P. Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Hannes Wallnoefer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 To put it right upfront, I don't think XML-RPC is a natural fit for
 xml.apache.org, and I'd prefer to see it at Jakarta. Let me explain.
 
 Even though I see your point, I'd still prefer seeing it over in XML
 alongside with the other technologies doing the same exact thing...
 
 Jakarta has alrady a wide enough spectrum of problems covered (from
 build
 systems, to ioc frameworks). From what I can see, XML-RPC is based on
 XML
 (or a subset of it), is used to transmit objects and call methods over
 HTTP
 (same as SOAP), s, since it's an alternative to SOAP, it should go
 alongside with it.
 
 -1 for XML-RPC on Jakarta...
 
 So you would be amenable to the XML-RPC package being an independent
 project under the xml.apache.org banner?
 
   Pier
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 --
 
 jvz.
 
 Jason van Zyl
 
 http://tambora.zenplex.org
 http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine
 http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
 http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria
 http://jakarta.apache.org/commons
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 

jvz.

Jason van Zyl

http://tambora.zenplex.org
http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine
http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Watch what you say...

2001-07-05 Thread Jon Stevens

It might become a news article on a website...

http://xmlhack.com/read.php?item=1291

Lol!

Can someone please correct that CollabNet is not a Jakarta Project, but
instead a Company? :-)

-jon


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta

2001-07-05 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.

I believed that xml.apache.org was the appropriate place to try first,
and if it can find a happy home there, I still think thats appropriate.

However, this is a living community, not just a code base - Hannes and
co-conspirators are coming with it.  Therefore, I think top level in xml
would be nice, but that's only a suggestion - I am not a part of
xml.apache community.

If they can't be acommodated in a way that is satisfactory to all, +1
for here in Jakarta.

geir


-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr.   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
System and Software Consulting
Developing for the web?  See http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
You have a genius for suggesting things I've come a cropper with!

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta

2001-07-05 Thread Jon Stevens

on 7/5/01 5:52 PM, Pier P. Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Ok, one day I'll change it (also because it generates 70% of the traffic on
 daedalus!)

And because CollabNet has to pay for that...

-jon


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta

2001-07-05 Thread Daniel F. Savarese


 [  ]Jon Stevens

-0

It seems like xml.apache.org should be the place, but I really don't care
where it lives that much cause we can always move projects around if we need
to. I do think that if it goes to xml.apache.org it should be a top level
project.

I feel about the same.  xml.apache.org seems the logical place for it,
but I understand some of the motivation to place it in jakarta.

[ 0] Daniel Savarese



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta

2001-07-05 Thread Pier P. Fumagalli

Jon Stevens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 on 7/5/01 5:52 PM, Pier P. Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Ok, one day I'll change it (also because it generates 70% of the traffic on
 daedalus!)
 
 And because CollabNet has to pay for that...

Comes straight out of your paycheck? :) :) :)

Pier (being the usual asshole!)


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta

2001-07-05 Thread Sam Ruby

Jason van Zyl wrote:

 Fair enough, I will no longer argue the point. My main concern is that
 the project be granted full autonomy as a project initially as Hannes
 and the rest of the committers become accustomed to xml.apache.org than
 we can discuss the possible integration with Axis.

 Does this sound reasonable?

+1

I'll even volunteer to set up the mailing lists, cvs trees, authorization,
etc.  And, of course, integrate it into Gump.  ;-)

- Sam Ruby


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta

2001-07-05 Thread Ted Leung

Hello all,

It is not true that there is no interest in XML-RPC at xml.apache.org.  I
would be
amenable to / in-favor of XML RPC being an independent project under
xml.apache.org.  I would prefer it if we could find a way to make this fit
in with Axis,
assuming that the respective committers can get along and make it work.

The whole point of having a separate XML project is for XML related
code-bases
to go there.  With a name like XML-RPC, it is hard to argue that XML-RPC
is not an XML related project.  Please don't try to circumvent the structure
that the ASF
has put in place.   As someone pointed out, If we were talking about a C or
C++
implementation of XML-RPC, then I don't think we would be arguing about
where this
particular code base belongs.

Ted Leung
Chair XML PMC

- Original Message -
From: Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 7:18 AM
Subject: Re: Helma XML-RPC @ Jakarta


 On 7/5/01 7:55 AM, Pier P. Fumagalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Hannes Wallnoefer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  To put it right upfront, I don't think XML-RPC is a natural fit for
  xml.apache.org, and I'd prefer to see it at Jakarta. Let me explain.
 
  Even though I see your point, I'd still prefer seeing it over in XML
  alongside with the other technologies doing the same exact thing...
 
  Jakarta has alrady a wide enough spectrum of problems covered (from
build
  systems, to ioc frameworks). From what I can see, XML-RPC is based on
XML
  (or a subset of it), is used to transmit objects and call methods over
HTTP
  (same as SOAP), s, since it's an alternative to SOAP, it should go
  alongside with it.
 
  -1 for XML-RPC on Jakarta...

 So you would be amenable to the XML-RPC package being an independent
 project under the xml.apache.org banner?

Pier
 
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 --

 jvz.

 Jason van Zyl

 http://tambora.zenplex.org
 http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine
 http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
 http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria
 http://jakarta.apache.org/commons



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]