Re: [ATTN: Release Managers] 3 binding +1's for a Release from PMC folks
Dims, The Woden M5 vote returned only 1 binding +1 vote from an Incubator PMC member ... you. It has +1 votes from Jeremy Hughes and Tom Jordahl who are both WS PMC members. Are these binding for M5 or does Woden require binding votes from Incubator PMC members only. If so I'll post again for an Incubator vote. John Kaputin Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To mgeneral@ws.apache.org cc 31/05/2006 11:53 Subject [ATTN: Release Managers] 3 binding Please respond to +1's for a Release from PMC folks [EMAIL PROTECTED] .org Dear Release Managers, [Sorry for the cross post!] Please don't make a release unless there are 3 binding votes from pmc members. We need it for legal purposes. There is one more quirk about what we actually vote on. HTTPD pmc votes on a svn tag and then the release managers cut binaries corresponding to that tag. We tend to vote on a feature list and then release managers make it happen.Again this is also for legal purposes to make sure that there is proper oversight on what gets into a release. I am still finding out how other projects do it. Your suggestions are welcome! Please post only to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for discussion to ensure maximum participation. thanks, dims -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ATTN: Release Managers] 3 binding +1's for a Release from PMC folks
please ping paul and sanjiva and ask them to vote. they are on incubator pmc. thx, dims On 6/20/06, John Kaputin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dims, The Woden M5 vote returned only 1 binding +1 vote from an Incubator PMC member ... you. It has +1 votes from Jeremy Hughes and Tom Jordahl who are both WS PMC members. Are these binding for M5 or does Woden require binding votes from Incubator PMC members only. If so I'll post again for an Incubator vote. John Kaputin Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To mgeneral@ws.apache.org cc 31/05/2006 11:53 Subject [ATTN: Release Managers] 3 binding Please respond to +1's for a Release from PMC folks [EMAIL PROTECTED] .org Dear Release Managers, [Sorry for the cross post!] Please don't make a release unless there are 3 binding votes from pmc members. We need it for legal purposes. There is one more quirk about what we actually vote on. HTTPD pmc votes on a svn tag and then the release managers cut binaries corresponding to that tag. We tend to vote on a feature list and then release managers make it happen.Again this is also for legal purposes to make sure that there is proper oversight on what gets into a release. I am still finding out how other projects do it. Your suggestions are welcome! Please post only to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for discussion to ensure maximum participation. thanks, dims -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ATTN: Release Managers] 3 binding +1's for a Release from PMC folks
On 6/1/06, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/2/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Guys what's in commons-util? That seems like a redundant naming strategy .. commons is by definition utility stuff so what's a utility within commons?? It's defined as a set of utilities for XML handling, each of which which are too small for a separate project. Included are xs:dateTime parses and formatters, serializers, classes for namespace handling, and stuff like that. Give me a better name, although I wouldn't be too happy to change it after the project is around for 1 year. (And has always been since the foundation of the ws-commons.) There was a Jakarta Commons Utils many eons ago, but we threw the name out and split it up into Lang, IO, Codec and others. They grew. :) Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ATTN: Release Managers] 3 binding +1's for a Release from PMC folks
On 6/2/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There was a Jakarta Commons Utils many eons ago, but we threw the name out and split it up into Lang, IO, Codec and others. They grew. :) I have no problem with splitting them when I find *that* there is something growing. Within the last year, I didn't have that impression. Jochen -- Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. (Mark Twain) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ws-commons Was: [ATTN: Release Managers] 3 binding +1's for a Release from PMC folks
On 6/1/06, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/2/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There was a Jakarta Commons Utils many eons ago, but we threw the name out and split it up into Lang, IO, Codec and others. They grew. :) I have no problem with splitting them when I find *that* there is something growing. Within the last year, I didn't have that impression. Yeah, there was also [http] and [servlet] which didn't grow and were lost in the ether of the sandbox. For Jakarta, the split had an easy metaphor in that each new component was (at first) a match for a J2SE package. I don't know if WS has anything of that sort. Things did explode activity-wise after Util was split up, but I'm not wanting to imply that that would happen again. I've only just joined the list, thought I'd hang out here a bit. Does ws-commons have its own mailng list, or does it do its dev stuff here? The site doesn't seem to show the utils component. Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ws-commons Was: [ATTN: Release Managers] 3 binding +1's for a Release from PMC folks
Hen, commons-dev@ws.apache.org -- dims On 6/2/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/1/06, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/2/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There was a Jakarta Commons Utils many eons ago, but we threw the name out and split it up into Lang, IO, Codec and others. They grew. :) I have no problem with splitting them when I find *that* there is something growing. Within the last year, I didn't have that impression. Yeah, there was also [http] and [servlet] which didn't grow and were lost in the ether of the sandbox. For Jakarta, the split had an easy metaphor in that each new component was (at first) a match for a J2SE package. I don't know if WS has anything of that sort. Things did explode activity-wise after Util was split up, but I'm not wanting to imply that that would happen again. I've only just joined the list, thought I'd hang out here a bit. Does ws-commons have its own mailng list, or does it do its dev stuff here? The site doesn't seem to show the utils component. Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ATTN: Release Managers] 3 binding +1's for a Release from PMC folks
Hi, Dims, Pleading guilty for ws-commons-util 1.0 and ws-commons-java5. Should I run the votes now? Jochen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ATTN: Release Managers] 3 binding +1's for a Release from PMC folks
Please bump up the version # slightly and let's cut a new release. thanks, dims On 6/1/06, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Dims, Pleading guilty for ws-commons-util 1.0 and ws-commons-java5. Should I run the votes now? Jochen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ATTN: Release Managers] 3 binding +1's for a Release from PMC folks
Guys what's in commons-util? That seems like a redundant naming strategy .. commons is by definition utility stuff so what's a utility within commons?? Sanjiva. On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 08:34 +0200, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: Hi, Dims, Pleading guilty for ws-commons-util 1.0 and ws-commons-java5. Should I run the votes now? Jochen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ATTN: Release Managers] 3 binding +1's for a Release from PMC folks
On 6/2/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Guys what's in commons-util? That seems like a redundant naming strategy .. commons is by definition utility stuff so what's a utility within commons?? It's defined as a set of utilities for XML handling, each of which which are too small for a separate project. Included are xs:dateTime parses and formatters, serializers, classes for namespace handling, and stuff like that. Give me a better name, although I wouldn't be too happy to change it after the project is around for 1 year. (And has always been since the foundation of the ws-commons.) Jochen -- Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. (Mark Twain) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ATTN: Release Managers] 3 binding +1's for a Release from PMC folks
Dear Release Managers, [Sorry for the cross post!] Please don't make a release unless there are 3 binding votes from pmc members. We need it for legal purposes. There is one more quirk about what we actually vote on. HTTPD pmc votes on a svn tag and then the release managers cut binaries corresponding to that tag. We tend to vote on a feature list and then release managers make it happen.Again this is also for legal purposes to make sure that there is proper oversight on what gets into a release. I am still finding out how other projects do it. Your suggestions are welcome! Please post only to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for discussion to ensure maximum participation. thanks, dims -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ATTN: Release Managers] 3 binding +1's for a Release from PMC folks
Hi Dims, Thanks for the reminder. Are there any releases that need to take steps to correct this? Is there a list of WS PMC members somewhere? I know that you always do +1 (binding), but I don't think everyone always does this. Regarding the release process I have tended to call a vote, tag, publish a release, vet it with people, then announce if everyone OKs. If we require a tag wouldn't that require two votes? One to say - do you want to do a release? And then another to say how about this tag? Cheers, - Dan Davanum Srinivas wrote: Dear Release Managers, [Sorry for the cross post!] Please don't make a release unless there are 3 binding votes from pmc members. We need it for legal purposes. There is one more quirk about what we actually vote on. HTTPD pmc votes on a svn tag and then the release managers cut binaries corresponding to that tag. We tend to vote on a feature list and then release managers make it happen.Again this is also for legal purposes to make sure that there is proper oversight on what gets into a release. I am still finding out how other projects do it. Your suggestions are welcome! Please post only to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for discussion to ensure maximum participation. thanks, dims -- Dan Diephouse (616) 971-2053 Envoi Solutions LLC http://netzooid.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [ATTN: Release Managers] 3 binding +1's for a Release from PMC folks
It's on our front page :) http://ws.apache.org/ That's the problem. i want to reduce the # of votes. i think typically in httpd pmc the release manager works evern w/o the first vote. so technically there is only one vote. -- dims On 5/31/06, Dan Diephouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Dims, Thanks for the reminder. Are there any releases that need to take steps to correct this? Is there a list of WS PMC members somewhere? I know that you always do +1 (binding), but I don't think everyone always does this. Regarding the release process I have tended to call a vote, tag, publish a release, vet it with people, then announce if everyone OKs. If we require a tag wouldn't that require two votes? One to say - do you want to do a release? And then another to say how about this tag? Cheers, - Dan Davanum Srinivas wrote: Dear Release Managers, [Sorry for the cross post!] Please don't make a release unless there are 3 binding votes from pmc members. We need it for legal purposes. There is one more quirk about what we actually vote on. HTTPD pmc votes on a svn tag and then the release managers cut binaries corresponding to that tag. We tend to vote on a feature list and then release managers make it happen.Again this is also for legal purposes to make sure that there is proper oversight on what gets into a release. I am still finding out how other projects do it. Your suggestions are welcome! Please post only to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for discussion to ensure maximum participation. thanks, dims -- Dan Diephouse (616) 971-2053 Envoi Solutions LLC http://netzooid.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
