Re: [gentoo-user] kdevelop-2.1.5 with kde-3.1.2

2003-06-24 Thread Josh Helmer
On Tuesday 24 June 2003 10:09 am, Dmitry Suzdalev wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 June 2003 18:57, Lars Juel Nielsen wrote:
> > now you mention it, that sounds about right, haven't tried it myuself
> > but seem to recall reading it once when i used mandrake.
>
> So all we can do for now is to wait until someone experienced will tell us
> the correct name of this environment variable :).


If you havn't already blown away your /usr/bin/autoconf file you can just set 
the environment variable WANT_AUTOCONF_2_5=1 to use the 2.57 version or set 
it to WANT_AUTOCONF_2_1=1 to use the 2.13 version.   For more info, just open 
the file /usr/bin/autoconf and check out what it does.  It is just a shell 
script that tries to determine the version of autoconf is needed and then 
call the appropriate version.  The same magic is done for automake and 
autoheader too, so it might not be a bad idea to get a handle on what is 
being done...

Josh


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Good code editor (with colors) for X (no GTK or QT)

2003-07-22 Thread Josh Helmer
On Tuesday 22 July 2003 12:34 am, Renat Golubchyk wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 July 2003 09:16, Fredrik Jagenheim wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 12:49:41AM +0200, Sebastian Hungerecker wrote:
> > > > Is emacs an X app? Or console based?
> > >
> > > It's both (like vim, too)
> >
> > Isn't vim dependant on gtk when running as a X app though? I think the
> > OP (for some unknown reason) didn't want an application that depended
> > on either GTK or QT.
>
> Actually, gvim can be compiled without GTK but with Motif support. I don't
> like it that way, but it would at least fit the condition of not being
> dependent on GTK or QT.

There may not be an ebuild for it, but vim can also be compiled against Xlibs 
(or at least that used to be possible!).  If you go that route the only GUI 
dependencies are the libraries required for a minimal X system.  It looks 
like hell, but it works fine.   Vim's the only editor I know of that can be 
compiled against all of the major widget libraries (Gtk, KDE, Motif, Win32, 
Xlib, or just console based) - you get to pick how much "bloat" you are 
willing to tolerate.  

On the bloat vs. useful features scale, vim does better than any other editor 
I know of...  The only downside, IMHO, is the learning curve...

Josh


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] vim does not care about tabspace

2003-12-04 Thread Josh Helmer
On Thursday 04 December 2003 05:30 pm, Jan Drugowitsch wrote:
> On Thursday 04 December 2003 22:07, Jan Drugowitsch wrote:
> > Somehow, vim doesn't case about the set tabespace in the ~/.vimrc file.
> > Although I've a clear 'set ts=4' in there, it always starts of with a
> > tabspace size of 8. Only after setting it to 4 with ':set ts=4' it works.
> > The spacewidth is set to 4 and works immediately.
> >

What language are you editing?  I had the same problem with python files a 
while back.  I could never figure out why, but every .py file I would open 
would use an 8 space tab.  Everything else would use 4...  I always assumed 
that it was something in the syntax file, but I don't use python enough to 
spend too much time figuring it out.  Maybe one of your syntax files is 
overriding your settings?

Josh


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] ripping music cd to mp3

2003-12-07 Thread Josh Helmer
On Sunday 07 December 2003 09:35 pm, Tom Hosiawa wrote:
> After doing some googling, I know I can't mount a music cd.
>
> So if I want to rip the songs of the cd to mp3's with a program like
> lame, how do I tell it where the input wav file is? Or is there some
> better way to ripping music cd's?

The easiest way that I know of is to just use konqueror.  If you enter 
audiocd:// in the address bar it will show you the contents of the CD in wav, 
mp3 and ogg-vorbis format.  Just select the files and copy them to your hard 
drive.  Doesn't get much easier than that...

Josh


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] UserMode Linux and XFS

2003-12-11 Thread Josh Helmer
On Thursday 11 December 2003 05:22 pm, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
> I wanted to install UserMode Linux but notice it does not have support for
> the XFS file system built in.  My system is all XFS so how do I run
> Usermode - or do I?  Do I set it to ext2, ext3, etc. or will it figure out
> it's running on XFS?

The "disk" for usermode linux is just a file (a loopback device).   Just 
format it with ext3, reiser or some other filesystem.  UML shouldn't care 
what FS the host system uses.

Josh




--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] AutoConf >= 2.50

2004-01-07 Thread Josh Helmer
On Wednesday 07 January 2004 02:07 pm, Kurt Guenther wrote:
> Dang.  I get the same thing, but when I do a:
>
> # which autoconf
> /usr/bin/autoconf
> # autoconf --version
> Autoconf version 2.13
>
> Strange, but I'll push onward.  Thanks for the assist.
ailing list

This trips a lot of peole up.  It should be added to a FAQ somewhere...

[EMAIL PROTECTED] josh]$ vim `which autoconf`
[EMAIL PROTECTED] josh]$ autoconf --version
Autoconf version 2.13
[EMAIL PROTECTED] josh]$ export WANT_AUTOCONF=2.5
[EMAIL PROTECTED] josh]$ autoconf --version
autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.58
Written by David J. MacKenzie and Akim Demaille.

Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] josh]$ unset WANT_AUTOCONF

Josh


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-user] 2.6 issues.

2003-09-15 Thread Josh Helmer
Hi folks...

I have been playing with 2.6 for a while now (mm-sources-2.6.0-test5).  For 
the most part I am happy with it.  

The only real issue that I have had is logging in.   When I boot into 2.4, I 
can login to my system without any problems.  When I boot into 2.6 and try to 
login as a user the system hangs.  I am able to log in as root and then su - 
to a user, but that's a headache.  I have tried logging in at a prompt, using 
xdm and using kdm...  All fail.   On the other hand, I CAN log in as a user 
by ssh without problems.

I have added my users to the tty group, but that doesn't seem to help.

When the login hangs, I try to do a SysRq+T to get the state, but the machine 
slowly prints (literally takes about 10 seconds and you can see each 
character printed individually):

SysRq : Show State

and then quits.  From that point on none of the SysRq functions will work at 
all.

Any ideas what I am doing wrong?

Josh


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] 2.6 issues.

2003-09-15 Thread Josh Helmer
On Monday 15 September 2003 02:06 pm, Collins Richey wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 09:50:06 -0700
>
> Josh Helmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi folks...
> >
> > I have been playing with 2.6 for a while now (mm-sources-2.6.0-test5). 
> > For the most part I am happy with it.
> >
> > The only real issue that I have had is logging in.   When I boot into
> > 2.4, I can login to my system without any problems.  When I boot into 2.6
> > and try to login as a user the system hangs.  I am able to log in as root
> > and then su - to a user, but that's a headache.  I have tried logging in
> > at a prompt, using xdm and using kdm...  All fail.   On the other hand, I
> > CAN log in as a user by ssh without problems.
> >
> > I have added my users to the tty group, but that doesn't seem to help.
> >
> > When the login hangs, I try to do a SysRq+T to get the state, but the
> > machine slowly prints (literally takes about 10 seconds and you can see
> > each character printed individually):
> >
> > SysRq : Show State
> >
> > and then quits.  From that point on none of the SysRq functions will work
> > at all.
> >
> > Any ideas what I am doing wrong?
>
> What type of hardwre?  Kernel (or other critical components) built with
> wild optimizations?

I am running it on a Toshiba Satellite 5005-S507 laptop (1.1Ghz pentium3, 512M 
RAM, Nvidia video, buggy ACPI).  I don't have any special optimizations.  My 
CFLAGS is just set to '-march=pentuim3 -O2 -pipe' - nothing too radical.

As for the kernel config, I left things pretty generic.  I don't believe that 
I have any unusual optimizations enabled...  Here is my full config:

#
# Automatically generated make config: don't edit
#
CONFIG_X86=y
CONFIG_MMU=y
CONFIG_UID16=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_ISA_DMA=y

#
# Code maturity level options
#
CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL=y
CONFIG_CLEAN_COMPILE=y
CONFIG_STANDALONE=y
CONFIG_BROKEN_ON_SMP=y

#
# General setup
#
CONFIG_SWAP=y
CONFIG_SYSVIPC=y
# CONFIG_BSD_PROCESS_ACCT is not set
CONFIG_SYSCTL=y
CONFIG_LOG_BUF_SHIFT=14
# CONFIG_IKCONFIG is not set
# CONFIG_EMBEDDED is not set
CONFIG_KALLSYMS=y
CONFIG_FUTEX=y
CONFIG_EPOLL=y
CONFIG_IOSCHED_NOOP=y
CONFIG_IOSCHED_AS=y
CONFIG_IOSCHED_DEADLINE=y
CONFIG_IOSCHED_CFQ=y

#
# Loadable module support
#
CONFIG_MODULES=y
CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD=y
CONFIG_MODULE_FORCE_UNLOAD=y
CONFIG_OBSOLETE_MODPARM=y
CONFIG_MODVERSIONS=y
CONFIG_KMOD=y

#
# Processor type and features
#
CONFIG_X86_PC=y
# CONFIG_X86_VOYAGER is not set
# CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ is not set
# CONFIG_X86_SUMMIT is not set
# CONFIG_X86_BIGSMP is not set
# CONFIG_X86_VISWS is not set
# CONFIG_X86_GENERICARCH is not set
# CONFIG_X86_ES7000 is not set
# CONFIG_M386 is not set
# CONFIG_M486 is not set
# CONFIG_M586 is not set
# CONFIG_M586TSC is not set
# CONFIG_M586MMX is not set
CONFIG_M686=y
# CONFIG_MPENTIUMII is not set
# CONFIG_MPENTIUMIII is not set
# CONFIG_MPENTIUM4 is not set
# CONFIG_MK6 is not set
# CONFIG_MK7 is not set
# CONFIG_MK8 is not set
# CONFIG_MELAN is not set
# CONFIG_MCRUSOE is not set
# CONFIG_MWINCHIPC6 is not set
# CONFIG_MWINCHIP2 is not set
# CONFIG_MWINCHIP3D is not set
# CONFIG_MCYRIXIII is not set
# CONFIG_MVIAC3_2 is not set
# CONFIG_X86_GENERIC is not set
CONFIG_X86_CMPXCHG=y
CONFIG_X86_XADD=y
CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT=5
CONFIG_RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM=y
CONFIG_X86_PPRO_FENCE=y
CONFIG_X86_WP_WORKS_OK=y
CONFIG_X86_INVLPG=y
CONFIG_X86_BSWAP=y
CONFIG_X86_POPAD_OK=y
CONFIG_X86_GOOD_APIC=y
CONFIG_X86_USE_PPRO_CHECKSUM=y
# CONFIG_X86_4G is not set
# CONFIG_X86_SWITCH_PAGETABLES is not set
# CONFIG_X86_4G_VM_LAYOUT is not set
# CONFIG_X86_UACCESS_INDIRECT is not set
# CONFIG_X86_HIGH_ENTRY is not set
# CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE is not set
# CONFIG_HPET_TIMER is not set
# CONFIG_HPET_EMULATE_RTC is not set
# CONFIG_SMP is not set
CONFIG_PREEMPT=y
CONFIG_X86_UP_APIC=y
# CONFIG_X86_UP_IOAPIC is not set
CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC=y
CONFIG_X86_TSC=y
CONFIG_X86_MCE=y
# CONFIG_X86_MCE_NONFATAL is not set
CONFIG_X86_MCE_P4THERMAL=y
CONFIG_TOSHIBA=m
# CONFIG_I8K is not set
CONFIG_MICROCODE=m
CONFIG_X86_MSR=m
CONFIG_X86_CPUID=m
# CONFIG_EDD is not set
CONFIG_NOHIGHMEM=y
# CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G is not set
# CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G is not set
# CONFIG_MATH_EMULATION is not set
CONFIG_MTRR=y
CONFIG_HAVE_DEC_LOCK=y

#
# Power management options (ACPI, APM)
#
CONFIG_PM=y
CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND=y

#
# ACPI (Advanced Configuration and Power Interface) Support
#
CONFIG_ACPI_HT=y
CONFIG_ACPI=y
CONFIG_ACPI_BOOT=y
CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=y
CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP_PROC_FS=y
CONFIG_ACPI_AC=m
CONFIG_ACPI_BATTERY=m
CONFIG_ACPI_BUTTON=m
CONFIG_ACPI_FAN=m
CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=m
CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL=m
# CONFIG_ACPI_ASUS is not set
CONFIG_ACPI_TOSHIBA=m
CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG=y
CONFIG_ACPI_BUS=y
CONFIG_ACPI_INTERPRETER=y
CONFIG_ACPI_EC=y
CONFIG_ACPI_POWER=y
CONFIG_ACPI_PCI=y
CONFIG_ACPI_SYSTEM=y

#
# APM (Advan

Re: [gentoo-user] Disabling from X

2003-09-26 Thread Josh Helmer
On Thursday 25 September 2003 11:59 pm, Juha-Mikko Ahonen wrote:
> On pe, 2003-09-26 at 09:22, Craig Main wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Is there a way to diable the above to stop people getting to a console?

I think that the easiest solution might be to just set the "DontVTSwitch" and 
"DontZap" options in your XF86Config file.   If you are running > 4.2 I 
believe that this will solve your problem.  Check the XF86Config man page for 
the exact syntax.

Josh


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-user] 802.11[bg] hardware support.

2003-10-26 Thread Josh Helmer
Hey folks...

I am considering changing my existing home network to wireless.  
Unfortunately, from what I can tell, wireless is not well supported under 
linux.  I will be using 1 PC that may or may not be attached directly by a 
wire (haven't decided yet), 2 laptops - one where I would prefer using PCMCIA 
if possible and with the other I can use PCMCIA, USB or CompactFlash - and a 
TIVO unit that is supposed to support both the Linksys WUSB11 v2.6 and WUSB12 
adapters.   I am running the 2.6 kernel on all my machines.  I would prefer 
to use 802.11g, but support for that seems to be REALLY lagging behind... 
Does anyone have any hardware recomendations?

Josh


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Laptop + Gentoo

2003-06-05 Thread Josh Helmer
Be careful with Toshiba laptops.  Getting my Toshiba Satellite 5005-507S 
working under linux was a big pain in the ass.  I tried Redhat, Mandrake and 
finally settled on gentoo before I could get it working reasonably well.  
Even now, I can't use any of the gentoo kernel-sources ebuilds.  Instead I 
had to download clean kernel sources from kernel.org and the appropriate 
patches to fix the issues (primarily ACPI,  and sound.  I still have this 
wierd thing where I have to re-configure the touchpad for X everytime I boot 
to a new kernel).

Josh

On Wednesday 04 June 2003 08:02 am, Johnny Andersson wrote:
> I'm getting a laptop soon. Not the latest model, but reasonably useable
> (aiming for somewhere around 800 MHz, 256 meg).
>
> I'm using Gentoo on my desktop machine and I like it. I wonder if any of
> you have opinions on Gentoo on a laptop. I realize that the usual
> set-aside-a-day-to-compile-kde rules apply, but other than that, is Gentoo
> a wise choise for laptops? My theory is that as Gentoo is very
> customizable, and as you _have_ to compile your own kernel, the odds that
> you're gonna get your hardware working is good.
>
> Any comments? Or does anyone have good experiences with other distros on
> laptops?
>
>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Segmentation Fault Everywhere

2003-06-09 Thread Josh Helmer
On Monday 09 June 2003 09:22 am, brett holcomb wrote:
> Just because Windows doesn't seg fault doesn't mean it's
> not broken.  The compling, etc. we do with Gentoo is far
> harder on a system then Windows.  In addition Windows may
> not tell you - it just gives some strange error.
>
> 99.999% of seg faults are hardware.  There is a definitive
> reference on this but I don't have it where I can get to
> it.

Whoa!!!  I suspect that your source is horribly mistaken!  I *might* believe 
that 99% of SIGBUS errors are caused by hardware, but I have seen literally 
thousands of SIGSEGV dumps, and to the best of my knowledge every one of them 
was caused by software problems.  In fact, I *know* that many of them were 
because I have fixed more than a few of the memory problems that caused the 
SIGSEGV in the first place...

Josh


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] "Best java in Gentoo"

2005-02-19 Thread Josh Helmer
On Saturday 19 February 2005 1:57 pm, Ivan Yosifov wrote:
> There is a perfectly good java 1.5 ebuild for Gentoo. It is masked
> because of some "features" of 1.5. Java 1.5 uses the latest language
> features by default ( read: code containing enum as an identifier will
> not compile on 1.5 ). If you try to emerge openoffice or eclipse on 1.5
> they won't build. This does not mean you can't use Java 1.5 by any
> means. You can have an 1.4.2 jdk and 1.5 parallely installed and switch
> between them with 'java-config'. So you will have to switch to 1.4.2
> before emerge-ing any 'problematic' java packages ( there are a lot of
> them ) , and then switch back to 1.5 for daily use. Most people find
> this switching rather frustrating - hence Java 1.5 is hard masked. If
> the switching does not bother you - unmask it and use it.

Or better yet, install both java 1.4.x and java 1.5. Then, use java-config to 
set the system JVM to the 1.4.2 version (-S flag) and set the default JVM for 
your user account to 1.5.x (-s flag - you will need to source the stuff in 
~/.gentoo/ from your .bashrc file).You get all the java 1.5 goodies, but 
by default portage will use 1.4 for emerging programs.

Josh

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list