Re: [gentoo-user] Blackbox

2003-08-14 Thread Öì·å

> Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > 
> >> Hi! :)
> >>
> >> Is it easy to install Blackbox on a Gentoo system? Is it more stable 
> >> and faster than KDE? Do you suggest me any other GUI?
> >
> I prefer WindowMaker. It is available as an ebuild and small, fast and 
> very stable.

Oh,blackbox is very nice!I like it and it's easy to install it.You just need 

  emerge blackbox
and I think you need bbkeys.


Re: [gentoo-user] Blackbox

2003-08-14 Thread Alexander Futasz
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 11:06:10 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is it easy to install Blackbox on a Gentoo system? Is it more stable
> and faster than KDE? Do you suggest me any other GUI?

I would suggest openbox. It looks and performs better than fluxbox or
blackbox, IMHO.

# ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86 emerge =x11-wm/openbox-2.3.1

Alex

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Blackbox

2003-08-10 Thread Alexander Futasz
On 06 Aug 2003 15:16:44 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 14:01, Alexander Futasz wrote:
> > I would suggest openbox. It looks and performs better than fluxbox
> > or blackbox, IMHO.
> > 
> > # ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86 emerge =x11-wm/openbox-2.3.1

>Hi. I've been pretty happy with fluxbox, but things can always get
> better, right?
> 
>How do you measure performance to say it's better?

When I said it performs better than I didn't mean speed. English isn't
my native language, sorry. I prefer openbox because it is standards
compliant, its xft font rendering is better, edge resistance, pixmaps
buttons, excellent extra keyhandler called epist ..etc. Maybe fluxbox
has some of this stuff as well now, I don't know as I don't use it
anymore.

Alex

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] Blackbox

2003-08-09 Thread Mark Knecht
>
> >Hi. I've been pretty happy with fluxbox, but things can always get
> > better, right?
> >
> >How do you measure performance to say it's better?
>
> When I said it performs better than I didn't mean speed. English isn't
> my native language, sorry. I prefer openbox because it is standards
> compliant, its xft font rendering is better, edge resistance, pixmaps
> buttons, excellent extra keyhandler called epist ..etc. Maybe fluxbox
> has some of this stuff as well now, I don't know as I don't use it
> anymore.
>
> Alex

Alex,
   Your English is quite fine. Don't worry about that at all. I didn't
necessarily take your comment to mean speed and was just interested in why
you liked Openbox.

   I've built it to try it out, but it's complaining about the display, so
I'm going to have to find some setup documentation. Normal startup problems.

Thanks!

Mark



--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Blackbox

2003-08-07 Thread Mark Knecht
On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 14:01, Alexander Futasz wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 11:06:10 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Is it easy to install Blackbox on a Gentoo system? Is it more stable
> > and faster than KDE? Do you suggest me any other GUI?
> 
> I would suggest openbox. It looks and performs better than fluxbox or
> blackbox, IMHO.
> 
> # ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86 emerge =x11-wm/openbox-2.3.1
> 
> Alex
Alex,
   Hi. I've been pretty happy with fluxbox, but things can always get
better, right?

   How do you measure performance to say it's better?

Thanks,
Mark


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Blackbox

2003-08-06 Thread latin hypercube
I'm very happy running with Fluxbox.  Worth noting that it is easy to run KDE 
applications without using the KDE window manager and desktop.  I happen to 
like Kmail and use it on my desktop under KDE and on my laptop under Fluxbox.

On Monday 04 August 2003 15:54, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > Hi! :)
> >
> > Is it easy to install Blackbox on a Gentoo system? Is it more
> > stable and faster than KDE? Do you suggest me any other GUI?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Michel
>
> Hi,
>Very similar to Blackbox is fluxbox which I use very happily. 'emerge
> fluxbox' and 10 minutes later you're running. It's very stable and very
> simple. As my Linux usage is in the area of audio recording, I especially
> appreciate that fluxbox runs very few processes by default.
>
>fluxbox provides 'the slit' which is a small area to place docking apps,
> I can dock a number of things there, can auto hide them if I choose, etc.
> It's nice, simple and fast.
>
>These simplified environments are far simpler and more stable that
> either Gnome or KDE in my opinion. If you're looking for desktop icons you
> will need to do some work. fluxbox operates primarily from a desktop drive
> mouse based menu.
>
> Good luck,
> Mark
>
>
>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Blackbox

2003-08-05 Thread Michael Gruetzner
Andrew Gaffney wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi! :)

Is it easy to install Blackbox on a Gentoo system? Is it more stable 
and faster than KDE? Do you suggest me any other GUI?

I prefer WindowMaker. It is available as an ebuild and small, fast and 
very stable.

MfG
Michael
--
#ifdef STUPIDLY_TRUST_BROKEN_PCMD_ENA_BIT
2.4.0-test2 /usr/src/linux/drivers/ide/cmd640.c
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


RE: [gentoo-user] Blackbox

2003-08-04 Thread Mark Knecht
>
> Hi! :)
>
> Is it easy to install Blackbox on a Gentoo system? Is it more
> stable and faster than KDE? Do you suggest me any other GUI?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Michel

Hi,
   Very similar to Blackbox is fluxbox which I use very happily. 'emerge
fluxbox' and 10 minutes later you're running. It's very stable and very
simple. As my Linux usage is in the area of audio recording, I especially
appreciate that fluxbox runs very few processes by default.

   fluxbox provides 'the slit' which is a small area to place docking apps,
I can dock a number of things there, can auto hide them if I choose, etc.
It's nice, simple and fast.

   These simplified environments are far simpler and more stable that either
Gnome or KDE in my opinion. If you're looking for desktop icons you will
need to do some work. fluxbox operates primarily from a desktop drive mouse
based menu.

Good luck,
Mark



--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Blackbox

2003-08-04 Thread Collins Richey
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 11:06:10 -0400
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi! :)
> 
> Is it easy to install Blackbox on a Gentoo system? Is it more stable
> and faster than KDE? Do you suggest me any other GUI?
> 

Just emerge blackbox.

Anything is faster and less resource consumptive than kde or gnome. 
Most wm's are quite stable.
go to /usr/portage/x11-wm and you will be astounded by the choices.
Some of the wm's I've used, and all are usable, are icewm, blackbox,
fluxbox, xfce.  I'm currently using xfce4, which is not available as an
ebuild yet (still beta or pre-beta).
Use google to look up these (and others) and try them out.


-- 
Collins Richey - Denver Area
if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the 
worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for.



--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Blackbox

2003-08-04 Thread Andrew Gaffney
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi! :)

Is it easy to install Blackbox on a Gentoo system? Is it more stable and faster than KDE? Do you suggest me any other GUI?
Yes, 'emerge blackbox'. Well, just about anything is going to be more 
stable and faster than a bloated desktop environment like GNOME or KDE. 
I'm currently using Fluxbox. I've used Enlightenment in the past. I like 
both. Just so you don't think me biased, I have used both GNOME and KDE. 
They both have their advantages and disadvantages. If I wanted 
bloatware, I'd be running Windows :)

--
Andrew Gaffney
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


[gentoo-user] Blackbox

2003-08-04 Thread michel.dicroci
Hi! :)

Is it easy to install Blackbox on a Gentoo system? Is it more stable and faster than 
KDE? Do you suggest me any other GUI?

Thanks, 

Michel


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list