Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Good NFS for laptop?
Are you also aware that you can configure devfsd to "EXECUTE" a given script whenever a device becomes available? See: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-pda.xml (Code listing 2.6: Editing /etc/devfsd.conf) HTH, JZ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Good NFS for laptop?
Hi donnie, Am Donnerstag, 31. Juli 2003 08:23 schrieb donnie berkholz: [...] > As it turns out, rsync is quite a useful tool for this, although it's > obviously not a filesystem. > > In my ~/.bashrc: > alias home-up="rsync -avz -e ssh --exclude downloads/ ~/ master:~/" > alias home-down="rsync -avz -e ssh --delete --exclude downloads/ --exclude > ogg/ music/ master:~/ ~/" > > I type 'home-down' when I'm taking my laptop away, and 'home-up' when I > bring it back to sync with other things. I don't care to have a bunch of > stuff cluttering up my laptop so I exclude a few directories when > downloading. did you know unison? You should take a look! /CrPy -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Good NFS for laptop?
You rule:) On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 09:55, R'twick Niceorgaw wrote: > On 31 Jul 2003 at 9:20, Paul K. Dickson wrote: > > > Or hell, just schedule an rsync push/pull based on time intervals and > > system events. forget the whole nfs deal. > > > How about using unison ? I use it to sync my home dirs on my desktop and laptop and > so far it's serving the purpose :) > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Good NFS for laptop?
On 31 Jul 2003 at 9:20, Paul K. Dickson wrote: > Or hell, just schedule an rsync push/pull based on time intervals and > system events. forget the whole nfs deal. > How about using unison ? I use it to sync my home dirs on my desktop and laptop and so far it's serving the purpose :) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Good NFS for laptop?
> Filesystems that come in mind to offer that functionality are > Coda[1] and Intermezzo[2]. Last time I tried Intermezzo (maybe 6 months ago or so), it wasn't working. The kernel didn't recognize the required filesystem type or something. Other users reported it being pretty buggy as well. Wes -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Good NFS for laptop?
Or hell, just schedule an rsync push/pull based on time intervals and system events. forget the whole nfs deal. On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 09:06, Paul K. Dickson wrote: > I don't know about any good network file systems other than the few you > have listed, but, have you considered that this kind of functionality > isn't really what the nfs should be doing? Usually, this stuff relies > on a set of tools that use nfs as a transport method. My only > suggestion would be to use automount, which will auto unmount should the > detination become unavailable, then run something that will occationally > check for the sync destination to exist, and run a sync at a time > interval you specify, on laptop resume, etc etc. > > I've attached a script that I wrote to check for the presence of my PDA > on the usb port. Perhaps you can modify it to fit your needs. Cron it, > whatever. It does, if I remember correctly, loop every 5 sec, so that > will most likely need to be adjusted. > > > If you come up with any solutions, I'd be pleased to hear:) I currently > just backup my laptop by tar.gzing the home folder once every couple > weeks, but I'd like to have it automated every time I plug in;) > > Paul K. Dickson > > On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 22:19, Jens Mayer wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > beeing tired of synchronizing configfiles, browser's bookmarks > > and several other folders between various boxes in my LAN I came > > up with the idea to store my homedirectory remotely on my fileserver > > (a quite powerful Debian Woody box, XFS filesystem, recent kernel). > > > > So far, so good. If I had only desktops in my LAN, this wouldn't be > > much of a problem, perhaps Sun's NFS would be the choice (easy to set > > up, security concerns are not that important in my private LAN), or > > Samba, as I have experience with both of those two filesystems. > > > > But having a laptop I do pretty much work on I need something that > > allows "disconnected operation", that is: Caching the files accessed > > while network is unavailable and even having some files cached > > "sticky", like .dotfiles and similar stuff. This is important > > so I can work with the laptop if I'm not at home. > > > > After reconnection to the server, things should be synchronized again. > > > > Filesystems that come in mind to offer that functionality are > > Coda[1] and Intermezzo[2]. All in all they seem to be pretty > > "experimental", maybe Coda a bit less than Intermezzo. I'm > > not really sure how intensely these FS are developed: Intermezzo's > > last "News" entry on the homepage is dated over a year ago. Some > > folks on usenet say Coda is kinda "dead" since the developers > > itself think it's "overloaded" with features. > > > > OpenAFS[3] seems to have some sort of "disconnected operation" > > feature in it's TODO-list[4], but I haven't found much about > > this. > > > > I don't want to start a flamewar about NFS, AFS or other > > network filesystems. If anyone here has some experience > > with Coda or Intermezzo (or another NFS that could suit > > my needs), I'd like to hear. Bad news and good news. > > > > Mainly, there are two Gentoo Linux Clients I want to > > serve. I also have some SGI Indigos running IRIX and > > one NeXTstation running OpenSTEP, but I do not expect > > them to run any actual NFS. > > > > TIA, > > Jens > > > > Footnotes: > > -- > > [1] http://www.coda.cs.cmu.edu/ > > [2] http://www.inter-mezzo.org/ > > [3] http://www.openafs.org/ > > [4] http://www.openafs.org/frameless/projects.html > > __ > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Good NFS for laptop?
I don't know about any good network file systems other than the few you have listed, but, have you considered that this kind of functionality isn't really what the nfs should be doing? Usually, this stuff relies on a set of tools that use nfs as a transport method. My only suggestion would be to use automount, which will auto unmount should the detination become unavailable, then run something that will occationally check for the sync destination to exist, and run a sync at a time interval you specify, on laptop resume, etc etc. I've attached a script that I wrote to check for the presence of my PDA on the usb port. Perhaps you can modify it to fit your needs. Cron it, whatever. It does, if I remember correctly, loop every 5 sec, so that will most likely need to be adjusted. If you come up with any solutions, I'd be pleased to hear:) I currently just backup my laptop by tar.gzing the home folder once every couple weeks, but I'd like to have it automated every time I plug in;) Paul K. Dickson On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 22:19, Jens Mayer wrote: > Hi folks, > > beeing tired of synchronizing configfiles, browser's bookmarks > and several other folders between various boxes in my LAN I came > up with the idea to store my homedirectory remotely on my fileserver > (a quite powerful Debian Woody box, XFS filesystem, recent kernel). > > So far, so good. If I had only desktops in my LAN, this wouldn't be > much of a problem, perhaps Sun's NFS would be the choice (easy to set > up, security concerns are not that important in my private LAN), or > Samba, as I have experience with both of those two filesystems. > > But having a laptop I do pretty much work on I need something that > allows "disconnected operation", that is: Caching the files accessed > while network is unavailable and even having some files cached > "sticky", like .dotfiles and similar stuff. This is important > so I can work with the laptop if I'm not at home. > > After reconnection to the server, things should be synchronized again. > > Filesystems that come in mind to offer that functionality are > Coda[1] and Intermezzo[2]. All in all they seem to be pretty > "experimental", maybe Coda a bit less than Intermezzo. I'm > not really sure how intensely these FS are developed: Intermezzo's > last "News" entry on the homepage is dated over a year ago. Some > folks on usenet say Coda is kinda "dead" since the developers > itself think it's "overloaded" with features. > > OpenAFS[3] seems to have some sort of "disconnected operation" > feature in it's TODO-list[4], but I haven't found much about > this. > > I don't want to start a flamewar about NFS, AFS or other > network filesystems. If anyone here has some experience > with Coda or Intermezzo (or another NFS that could suit > my needs), I'd like to hear. Bad news and good news. > > Mainly, there are two Gentoo Linux Clients I want to > serve. I also have some SGI Indigos running IRIX and > one NeXTstation running OpenSTEP, but I do not expect > them to run any actual NFS. > > TIA, > Jens > > Footnotes: > -- > [1] http://www.coda.cs.cmu.edu/ > [2] http://www.inter-mezzo.org/ > [3] http://www.openafs.org/ > [4] http://www.openafs.org/frameless/projects.html #!/bin/bash # Test for PDA's presense and launch gpilotd if PDA exists. Repeat every 5 sec. # & don't relaunch or kill gpilotd, untill the pda has disconnected/stoped syncing. # *NOTE* this script requires 'pgrep' to function correctly. usbdev="/dev/usb/tts/1" keepgoing=1 while [ $keepgoing -gt 0 ] #keep the script going like a deamon baby! do pilotdrun=`pgrep gpilotd`# get gpilotd proc ID if running if [ -z $pilotdrun ] # check if gpilotd isn't running, else, kill it. then filler=1 else killall gpilotd fi sleep 5 # cause script to wait 5 sec before checking for the USB device. if [ -e $usbdev ]# does the palm exist then palmsyncing=1# set the palm syncing status to 'true/yes/on/1' gnome-terminal -x gpilotd & #palm did exist, sync up in a separate window for status baby! while [ $palmsyncing -gt 0 ]#keep loop active until palm doesn't exist so gpilotd won't be killed. do if [ -e $usbdev ]#test to see if palm exists/is done syncing then sleep 1 else palmsyncing=0 # USB palm device test failed, syncing must be done, set status to 0 # to exit status loop fi done fi done exit -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Good NFS for laptop?
This sounds like a job for CODA, but people may say that's overkill. I haven't yet used it myself but I should definitely do some exploring I think. Barry MacMahon Develops Web applications for Chiltern International at Head Office, Slough, UK Tel: +44 1753 216674 Ext: 274 "donnie berkholz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> .org>cc: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Good NFS for laptop? 31-07-2003 07:23 Please respond to gentoo-user > Hi folks, > > beeing tired of synchronizing configfiles, browser's bookmarks > and several other folders between various boxes in my LAN I came > up with the idea to store my homedirectory remotely on my fileserver (a > quite powerful Debian Woody box, XFS filesystem, recent kernel). > > So far, so good. If I had only desktops in my LAN, this wouldn't be > much of a problem, perhaps Sun's NFS would be the choice (easy to set > up, security concerns are not that important in my private LAN), or > Samba, as I have experience with both of those two filesystems. > > But having a laptop I do pretty much work on I need something that > allows "disconnected operation", that is: Caching the files accessed > while network is unavailable and even having some files cached > "sticky", like .dotfiles and similar stuff. This is important > so I can work with the laptop if I'm not at home. > > After reconnection to the server, things should be synchronized again. As it turns out, rsync is quite a useful tool for this, although it's obviously not a filesystem. In my ~/.bashrc: alias home-up="rsync -avz -e ssh --exclude downloads/ ~/ master:~/" alias home-down="rsync -avz -e ssh --delete --exclude downloads/ --exclude ogg/ music/ master:~/ ~/" I type 'home-down' when I'm taking my laptop away, and 'home-up' when I bring it back to sync with other things. I don't care to have a bunch of stuff cluttering up my laptop so I exclude a few directories when downloading. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Good NFS for laptop?
> Hi folks, > > beeing tired of synchronizing configfiles, browser's bookmarks > and several other folders between various boxes in my LAN I came > up with the idea to store my homedirectory remotely on my fileserver (a > quite powerful Debian Woody box, XFS filesystem, recent kernel). > > So far, so good. If I had only desktops in my LAN, this wouldn't be > much of a problem, perhaps Sun's NFS would be the choice (easy to set > up, security concerns are not that important in my private LAN), or > Samba, as I have experience with both of those two filesystems. > > But having a laptop I do pretty much work on I need something that > allows "disconnected operation", that is: Caching the files accessed > while network is unavailable and even having some files cached > "sticky", like .dotfiles and similar stuff. This is important > so I can work with the laptop if I'm not at home. > > After reconnection to the server, things should be synchronized again. As it turns out, rsync is quite a useful tool for this, although it's obviously not a filesystem. In my ~/.bashrc: alias home-up="rsync -avz -e ssh --exclude downloads/ ~/ master:~/" alias home-down="rsync -avz -e ssh --delete --exclude downloads/ --exclude ogg/ music/ master:~/ ~/" I type 'home-down' when I'm taking my laptop away, and 'home-up' when I bring it back to sync with other things. I don't care to have a bunch of stuff cluttering up my laptop so I exclude a few directories when downloading. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Good NFS for laptop?
On Thursday 31 July 2003 04:19, Jens Mayer wrote: > But having a laptop I do pretty much work on I need something that > allows "disconnected operation", that is: Caching the files accessed > while network is unavailable and even having some files cached > "sticky", like .dotfiles and similar stuff. This is important > so I can work with the laptop if I'm not at home. You may think of cvs or subversion to keep track of your files and changes... Arnold -- Get my public-key from pgp.mit.edu or pgp.uni-mainz.de --- Hi, I am a .signature virus. Please copy me into your ~/.signature and send me to all your contacts. After a month or so log in as root and do a rm / -rf. Or ask your administrator to do so... pgp0.pgp Description: signature
[gentoo-user] OT: Good NFS for laptop?
Hi folks, beeing tired of synchronizing configfiles, browser's bookmarks and several other folders between various boxes in my LAN I came up with the idea to store my homedirectory remotely on my fileserver (a quite powerful Debian Woody box, XFS filesystem, recent kernel). So far, so good. If I had only desktops in my LAN, this wouldn't be much of a problem, perhaps Sun's NFS would be the choice (easy to set up, security concerns are not that important in my private LAN), or Samba, as I have experience with both of those two filesystems. But having a laptop I do pretty much work on I need something that allows "disconnected operation", that is: Caching the files accessed while network is unavailable and even having some files cached "sticky", like .dotfiles and similar stuff. This is important so I can work with the laptop if I'm not at home. After reconnection to the server, things should be synchronized again. Filesystems that come in mind to offer that functionality are Coda[1] and Intermezzo[2]. All in all they seem to be pretty "experimental", maybe Coda a bit less than Intermezzo. I'm not really sure how intensely these FS are developed: Intermezzo's last "News" entry on the homepage is dated over a year ago. Some folks on usenet say Coda is kinda "dead" since the developers itself think it's "overloaded" with features. OpenAFS[3] seems to have some sort of "disconnected operation" feature in it's TODO-list[4], but I haven't found much about this. I don't want to start a flamewar about NFS, AFS or other network filesystems. If anyone here has some experience with Coda or Intermezzo (or another NFS that could suit my needs), I'd like to hear. Bad news and good news. Mainly, there are two Gentoo Linux Clients I want to serve. I also have some SGI Indigos running IRIX and one NeXTstation running OpenSTEP, but I do not expect them to run any actual NFS. TIA, Jens Footnotes: -- [1] http://www.coda.cs.cmu.edu/ [2] http://www.inter-mezzo.org/ [3] http://www.openafs.org/ [4] http://www.openafs.org/frameless/projects.html -- It was pity stayed his hand. "Pity I don't have any more bullets," thought Frito. -- _Bored_of_the_Rings_, a Harvard Lampoon parody of Tolkein -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list